DOCSLIB.ORG

THE THREE SONS of NOAH Gen

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THE THREE SONS OF NOAH Gen. 10 It’s usually the case that when we sit down to read through the Bible and we come to the genealogies we ‘skip over’ them, - we miss them out, we don’t really read them. But we need to remember that the portions of Scripture that contain the lists of the genealogies are as inspired as the portions of Scripture such as Ps. 23 and John 3:16. The Bible tells us that All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: that the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works. What then could God be saying to us this evening through these genealogies in Gen. 10? Verse 1 very clearly sets out the purpose of the chapter. Even before preachers hit on the idea of having three points, that is exactly how we find this chapter divided. Indeed, we find a good homiletical structure to this chapter: ∗ v.1 is the Introduction ∗ From vv. 2-5, the sons of Japheth ∗ From vv. 6-20, the sons of Ham ∗ From vv. 21-31, the sons of Shem ∗ v. 32 is the Conclusion So as we look at the generations of these three sons of Noah let’s keep the Biblical structure as we explore this important chapter. Before we consider them individually what kind of a background would these sons have had? 1. They would have been brought up in a society completely disobedient to the ways of God. ∗ The Bible tells us that as He looked upon the earth (Gen. 6:5) God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. ∗ As boys Shem, Ham and Japheth would have been brought up with friends and neighbours who resisted the will of God; their communities were strangers to the goodness and grace of God. D.G. 2 ∗ To the amusement, - no doubt, - of many their father began to construct a boat and the message was that God was going to visit the earth in His wrath. ∗ I’m sure the young boys were often taunted and made fun of. ∗ They would have been seen as being different, - and they would have been made to feel different, - to everyone else. ∗ And I suppose there would have been times when they just wanted to be like everybody else’s children, … because it was a strain having a dad like Noah who depended so much on God. 2. Their father was a faithful man of God (Gen. 6:9,10) ∗ And these young men would have been taught in the things of God from they were little babies. ∗ Night and day they would have heard God’s Name spoken with great respect and love, … for these young men had been brought up with all the privileges of a God-fearing home. ∗ Whilst they heard about the parents of their pals going out and – as Jesus put it, - eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, they were at home with mum and dad. ∗ They heard about their friends’ parents and … ∗ They were going out to parties, and they were sleeping around, and they were coming home drunk, and the marriages would have been breaking up and these young children, - these friends of Shem, Ham and Japheth, - they would have had other half-brothers and half-sisters, and they would have different ‘uncles’ staying with their mum, and different ‘mummies’ with their dad. ∗ But Shem, Ham and Japheth knew that their home was a different home where their mum and dad loved them dearly and cared for them faithfully. ∗ In their home the Name of God was so special, - it was never taken in vain or treated with disrespect. 3. When their father had completed the building of the ark they walked up into that boat … behind their mother and father and along with each of their wives (and notice there is no mention of polygamy). ∗ There’s no doubt about it, … they would have been laughed at, D.G. 3 ∗ But they had been brought up to respect their parents and the God of their parents, and these young men and their wives cast aside the scorns of their neighbours (notice too that they had their wives in subjection to the God of their father). ∗ As the rains began to fall they were glad they had taken shelter in the ark that was built at the command of and due to the specifications of God, ∗ … For those young men were saved from the catastrophe that God had sent upon the rest of the world because of their father and mother’s trust in God. Now, … that’s the background, - the introduction. That’s a picture of the society that these young men had experienced and also the love of their parents and obedience to the will of God. Let’s consider briefly these three sons. As I have said on previous occasions genealogies are a favourite study of mine and I went through the genealogies of the Bible and put them into charts, … and if you are interested I can let you have a copy of them. But we are not going to delve too deeply into the genealogies this evening, … just try to learn something about these three sons and what the Word of God has to teach us through them. THE SONS OF JAPHETH vv.2-5 ∗ If you can picture a map of the Mediterranean Sea the sons of Japheth moved to the north and the north-west of Israel. ∗ For example, Gomer, Magog, Tubal and Meshech moved off in the direction of the regions we would identify with Russia today. [See Ezek. 38] ∗ Tarshish was away over on the southern tip of Spain, - it was to Tarshish that Jonah planned to sail (1:3) ∗ Javan was Greece, Tiras is identified with the direction of Italy. ∗ The European peoples derived from the sons of Japheth. ∗ Some of these sons of Japheth we can trace throughout Scripture. In particular, Gomer, Magog, Tubal and Meshech became the enemies of God’s people and Magog is featured D.G. 4 in Rev. 20:8 on the side of Satan fighting against the people of God. ∗ And indeed many of the sons of Japheth were responsible for the terrorising of God’s people, - for example Hitler. ∗ Since we are only ‘skirting over the top’ of what the Bible has to say about these sons we won’t go too deeply, except to draw the picture that they moved away from there and set up a life for themselves. ∗ It is a sad fact too that the descendants of the sons of Japheth forgot about their father’s God and took the form of worshipping idols. ∗ It was to the descendants of the sons of Japheth that Paul was sent to bring the grace of God. THE SONS OF HAM vv.6-20 ∗ He was the disgrace of the family. ∗ He had a wife that he took into the ark, but we read that he saw the nakedness of his father, (i.e. they would call it bisexuality nowadays). ∗ He took advantage of a drunk man, … and true… Noah shouldn’t have been drunk no matter how good the wine in his vineyard was! ∗ … but Ham took the opportunity and Ham became a disgrace, … and more than that, he passed the disgrace on down through his generations. ∗ His father cursed him (9:25) and made him to become a servant unto Shem, … but anywhere we read about his descendants we find them in opposition to God’s people. ∗ For example, Ham’s son was Cush (10:6), and his son was Nimrod, and Nimrod built Babel (or Babylon), - the greatest enemy in history and in prophecy to the people of God. ∗ Another great enemy of the people of God was the descendants of Asshur (v.11), - Assyria; … and there is Nineveh too. ∗ And in v.16,17 there are the Jebusites, and the Amorites, and the Girgasites, and the Hivites. There, in v.19 is Gaza, Sodom and Gomorrah. ∗ The sons of Ham also settled in modern-day Africa, but wherever they were they always became the enemies of D.G. 5 God’s people, and they succeeded in leading many of God’s people astray. ∗ When the Hebrews settled in Canaan, among the descendants of Ham, I can’t understand how the Hebrews weren’t wise to the sons of Ham. ∗ It was obvious they had nothing in common with the sons of Ham, … nothing! ∗ Yet, … why did they get involved with them, - it ruined their reputation, it ruined their relationship with God, … why did God’s people get involved with the sons of Ham?! ∗ Why do God’s people today get involved with church groups and doctrines of apostates that the Bible tells them to have nothing to do with! ∗ So, there are the sons of Japheth and the sons of Ham, and then finally … THE SONS OF SHEM vv.21-31 ∗ Thus far we have seen these two sons of Noah rejecting the God of their father. ∗ Japheth, - I would imagine, - just ‘got away from it’. ∗ He left home, his parents, their style of life, their faithful adherence to the worship of God, and the God of their father just paled away. ∗ Ham, - I would imagine, - couldn’t wait until he got away from his parents and their old-fashioned faith in God.
Recommended publications
  • “Gog and Magog” Revelation 20:7-10; Ezekiel 38 & 39

    “Gog and Magog” Revelation 20:7-10; Ezekiel 38 & 39

    The Revelation of Jesus Christ “Gog and Magog” Revelation 20:7-10; Ezekiel 38 & 39 Introduction Revelation 20:1-6 presents the reality of Jesus Christ reigning over all the earth for 1000 years while Satan is locked up in the Abyss. In Revelation 20:7-10, John records the vision where Satan is released from the Abyss at the end of the Millennial Reign of Christ. Satan is then able to gather an army of rebels from all nations (“Gog and Magog”) to come against Christ in Jerusalem. This battle is referred to as the “Battle of Gog and Magog”. But there is also a battle of “Gog and Magog” mentioned in Ezekiel 38 & 39. Are these two battles the same? The Scripture makes it clear that there are two separate battles which carry the reference to “Gog and Magog”. Consideration of these battles will powerfully demonstrate that sinful men continue in their sinful rebellion against God, even after His glorious 1000-year reign of peace and prosperity. It is not surprising that God will judge those who reject His salvation through Jesus. I. The Historical Roots of Gog and Magog Gen. 10:2; Ez. 38:2,15; 39:3-9 A. Magog was a grandson of Noah (Genesis 10:2) B. The descendants of Magog settled in Europe and northern Asia (Ez. 38:2) referred to as "northern barbarians" C. The people of Magog were skilled warriors (Ezekiel 38:15; 39:3-9) II. Two Separate Battles of Gog and Magog Ez. 38 & 39; Rev. 20:7-10 A.
  • Jesus Is Coming

    Jesus Is Coming

    JESUS IS COMING JoLynn Gower 493-6151 [email protected] g VERSE FOR THE q Hebrews 9:27-28JOURNEY And inasmuch as it is appointed for men to die once and after this comes judgment, so Christ also, having been offered once to bear the sins of many, will appear a second time for salvation without reference to sin, to those who eagerly await Him. q Ezekiel was a priest, the son of Buzi q He was taken into exile in Babylon in 597 BC, in the second raid that Nebuchadnezzar made into Israel q Ezekiel 38:1-3 And the word of the LORD came to me saying, “Son of man, set your face toward Gog of the land of Magog, the prince of Rosh, Meshech and Tubal, and prophesy against him and say, 'Thus says the Lord GOD, ‘Behold, I am against you, O Gog, prince of Rosh, Meshech and Tubal.’” WHO ARE THESE PEOPLE? • Gog, Rosh, Meshech, Tubal • Russia/former Soviet reps • Persia • Iran • Cush or Ethiopia • Sudan, Ethiopia, Eritrea? • Put • Lybia, Algeria, Tunisia • Gomer • Turkey, Germany? Austria? • Beth-Togarmah • E. Turkey, Armenia, Asia? • Countries/mountain borders • Syria, Lebanon, N Jordan? • Many people • Islamic allies? • Sheba • Saudia Arabia • Dedan • Yemen, Oman, Gulf states A COMING INVASION q Ezekiel 38, 1-6 predicts a future invasion of Israel q Leader’s name: Gog of the land of Magog q Jerome and Joseph identify the land of Magog as near the Black and Caspian Seas north of the Caucasus Mountains, in the southern part of 21st-century Russia. q Leader’s position: prince of Rosh, Meshech, Tubal q Greek writers called the people of Meshech the “Moschoi,” and Assyrian records referred to them as the “ Muski.
  • 1 Genesis 10-‐11 Study ID#12ID1337 Alright, Shall We Open Our Bibles

    1 Genesis 10-‐11 Study ID#12ID1337 Alright, Shall We Open Our Bibles

    Genesis 10-11 Study ID#12ID1337 Alright, shall we open our Bibles tonight to Genesis 10. If you're just joining us on Wednesday, you're only nine chapters behind. So you can catch up, all of those are online, they are in video, they are on audio. We are working on translating all of our studies online into Spanish. It'll take awhile, but it's being done. We are also transcribing every study so that you can have a written copy of all that's said. You won't have to worry about notes. It'll all be there, the Scriptures will be there. So that's also in the process. It'll take awhile, but that's the goal and the direction we're heading. So you can keep that in your prayers. Tonight we want to continue in our in-depth study of this book of beginnings, the book of Genesis, and we've seen a lot if you've been with us. We looked at the beginning of the earth, and the beginning of the universe, and the beginning of mankind, and the origin of marriage, and the beginning of the family, and the beginning of sacrifice and worship, and the beginning of the gospel message, way back there in Chapter 3, verse 15, when the LORD promised One who would come that would crush the head of the serpent, preached in advance. We've gone from creation to the fall, from the curse to its conseQuences. We watched Abel and then Cain in a very ungodly line that God doesn't track very far.
  • Nicholas M. Railton Gog and Magog: the History of a Symbol

    Nicholas M. Railton Gog and Magog: the History of a Symbol

    EQ 75:1 (2003),23-43 Nicholas M. Railton Gog and Magog: the History of a Symbol Dr Nicholas Railton is lecturer in German at the University of Ulster. He has published books on the history of the Evangelical Alliance (The German Evangelical Alliance and the Third Reich, 1998; No North Sea. The Anglo-German Evangelical Network in the Middle of the Nineteenth Century, 2000) and articles on Christian responses to the Third Reich. Key words: Bible; Gog; Magog; symbolism. World politics, like the history of Gog and Magog, are very confused and much disputed. (Winston Churchill, 9 November 1951). Introduction Gog from the land of Magog, one of the great enemies of the people of God to appear at the end of the historical process, has vexed and bewildered exegetes for centuries. The prophet Ezekiel seems to speak of an unrepentant nation and its head and communicates God's impending judgement (Ezekiel 38:1-3, New American Stan- dard Bible) : .. And the word of the Lord came to me saying, 'Son of man, set your face toward Gog of the land of Magog, the prince of Rosh, Meshech and Tubal and prophesy against him and say, "Thus says the Lord God, 'Behold, I am against you, 0 Gog, prince of Rosh, Meshech and Tubal.'"' An examination of the historical development of this eschatologi­ cal idea, this Feindbild, will introduce us to the never-ending attempts to decipher these millennial foes inhabiting the areas to the far north of Palestine. This brief survey shows how the desire to interpret the signs of the times and understand the period in which one is living can, and usually has entrenched religious believers in an inflexible, nationalistic and self-righteous mind-set.
  • Ezekiel Week 20 the Defeat of Gog Chapter 38-39

    Ezekiel Week 20 the Defeat of Gog Chapter 38-39

    Ezekiel Week 20 The Defeat of Gog Chapter 38-39 Introduction Chs 38–39 Answers this question: Will God’s “servant David,” the one King of one nation, actually rule forever and put into effect an everlasting covenant (37:22–26), or will sinister forces combine to destroy His reign of peace? In order to allay fears for all time, God shows Ezekiel the very end of time. A literalistic interpretation of such prophecies, which identifies the foes with individual nations on the historical scene, is not only highly speculative but also does violence to biblical imagery.1 The Identity of Gog The biblical Gog is no mere historical figure, but rather a fear-inducing figure of cosmic proportions; and to make matters worse, he is not alone. He is the commander-in-chief (neśîʾ rōʾš) of a coalition of forces gathered from the ends of the earth. He himself is from the land of Magog, and he rules over Meshech-Tubal. His allies include Persia, Cush, and Put (38:5), along with Gomer and Beth Togarmah (38:6). It is no coincidence that together these make up a total of seven nations, and it is significant that they are gathered from the uttermost parts of the world known to the prophet. Meshech-Tubal, Gomer, and Beth Togarmah come from the north, Put (northwest Egypt) and Cush (southern Egypt) from the south and west, while Persia is to the east of Judah.2 One interesting interpretation identifies Gog as a cryptogram for Babel or Babylon. This identification bears some consideration, especially since Babylon was omitted from the nations mentioned in the messages of judgment of 25:1–32:32.
  • Journal of Ukrainian Studies

    Journal of Ukrainian Studies

    From Japheth to Moscow: Narrating Biblical and Ethnic Origins of the Slavs in Polish, Ukrainian, and Russian Historiography (Sixteenth-Eighteenth Centuries) Zenon E. Kohut Now these are the generations of the sons of Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth: and onto them were sons bom after the flood. The Sons of Japheth: Gomer, and Magog, and Madai, and Javan, and Tubal, and Meshech, and Tiras. And the sons of Gomer: Ashkenaz, and Riphath, and Togarmah. And the sons of Javan: Elishah, and Tarshish, Kittim, and Dodanim. From these the coastland peoples spread. These are the sons of Japheth in their lands, each with his own language, by their families, in their nations. Genesis 10: 1-5 Both medieval and early modem European historiographers traditionally traced the origins of humankind from the biblical Flood and considered the sons of Noah—Shem, Ham, and Japheth—ancestors of everyone on earth: “The sons of Noah who went forth from the ark were Shem, Ham, and Japheth. Ham was the father of Canaan. These three were the sons of Noah; and from these the whole earth was peopled.”^ Medieval and early modem authors paid particular attention to the status and place of settlement of a specific biblical progenitor. One such formula states that ''Sem ora, Cam labora, laffet rege et protege’' (Shem preaches, Ham labors, Japheth reigns and mles) and includes a list of lands settled by Noah’s descendants. In describing the distribution of lands, the Bible also assigns the lands of western and northern Europe to Noah’s son Japheth, who thus became the most favored candidate for progenitor of all Europeans.
  • The Magog Deception

    The Magog Deception

    The Magog Deception Open your bible to Ezekiel 38. Verse 1, “And the word of the LORD came unto me, saying, Son of man, set thy face against Gog, the land of Magog, the chief prince [or the prince of the chief] of Meshech and Tubal, and prophesy against him, And say, [...] I am against thee, O Gog, the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal...” God is against them. “Ezekiel tells us that Gog, [referring to Magog], the nation that will lead all of the other powers of darkness against Israel, will come out of the north. Biblical scholars have been saying for generation that Gog must be Russia. What other powerful nation is to the north of Israel? None. But it didn’t seem to make sense before the Russian revolution, when Russia was a Christian country. Now it does, now that Russia has become communistic and atheistic, now that Russia has set itself against God. Now it fits the description of Gog perfectly.” The above is part of a speech given at a dinner with California legislators back in 1971 by a then future U.S. President, Ronald Regan. People can come up with and propagate all kinds of theories of who is who and what is what when they do not study God’s Word along with the history that must go along with it. I have kind of pointed that out in this series for years now. Even a former U.S. President was convinced that Russia was Gog of Magog, that they are the ones to the north.
  • Revisiting Genesis 5 and 11: a Closer Look at the Chronogenealogies

    Revisiting Genesis 5 and 11: a Closer Look at the Chronogenealogies

    Andrews University Seminary Studies, Vol. 53, No. 2, 253-277. Copyright © 2015 Andrews University Seminary Studies. REVISITING GENESIS 5 AND 11: A CLOSER LOOK AT THE CHRONOGENEALOGIES BERNARD WHITE Busan, South Korea The genealogies of Gen 5 and 11 are unique in the Scripture record. Gerhard Hasel’s term chronogenealogy captures a major aspect of that uniqueness: they are genealogies with a major chronological component.1 By including ages at the birth of each named son, the number of years each individual lived after begetting that son, and the stated or implied total years of life for each individual, the two genealogies appear to provide a means by which to calculate the approximate number of years from Adam to Abraham.2 For 1Gerhard F. Hasel, “Genesis 5 and 11: Chronogenealogies in the Biblical History of Beginnings,” Origins 7.1 (1980): 23–37; “The Meaning of the Chronogenealogies of Genesis 5 and 11,” Origins 7.2 (1980): 53–70. Hasel’s term seems to have been adopted only by those inclined to accept a prima facie chronological intent of the two genealogies. See, for example, Jonathan Sarfati, “Biblical Chronogenealogies,” TJ 17.3 (2003): 14-18; Travis R. Freeman, “The Genesis 5 and 11 Fluidity Question,” TJ 19.2 (2005): 83–90. Chronological data is occasionally found in other genealogical material (Ex 6:16, 18, 20; 1 Chron 2:21); the significance of these ‘rarities’ will be explored at a later point in this paper. 2Bishop Ussher famously did just that—with injudicious precision!—in the mid-seventeenth century. But it is a pity that his name alone is so often cited in this respect, with the implication that using the chronological details of Gen 5 and 11 to estimate time since creation is to follow in his steps.
  • A PROPOSED CHRONOLOGY of the TRIBULATION—Part 4

    A PROPOSED CHRONOLOGY of the TRIBULATION—Part 4

    Claysburg Bible Church Session # 12 February 20, 2020 A PROPOSED CHRONOLOGY OF THE TRIBULATION—Part 4 B. Who are the participants in the battle? 1. Gog—The Prince or leader. Ezekiel 38:2-3 2 Son of man, set thy face against Gog, the land of Magog, the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal, and prophesy against him, 3 And say, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I am against thee, O Gog, the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal: • There are three possibilities for the identity of Gog: Gog—may be a personal proper name of a specific individual. I Chronicles 5:4 4The sons of Joel; Shemaiah his son, Gog his son, Shimei his son, Gog—may be a symbolic or placeholder name or a title for a person. The Antichrist is a placeholder name for a future unknown person. Gog—may be the actual name of a demonic prince under Satan’s leadership. A prince is one who exercises control or dominion over others. Daniel 10:13 13 But the prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me one and twenty days: but, lo, Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me; and I remained there with the kings of Persia. • Angels are assigned by God and Satan to positions of authority over nations. • Here, in Ezekiel, Gog would be a demonic angel whose dominion is the land of Magog under Satan’s leadership. Gog is an evil angel who motivates actions against God’s people by using a human being as his instrument. 2.
  • Genesis 10 & 11: a Theological and Geographical Framework for The

    Genesis 10 & 11: a Theological and Geographical Framework for The

    LIBERTY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF DIVINITY Genesis 10 & 11: A Theological and Geographical Framework for the Mission of Paul A Thesis Submitted to Dr. Martin Sheldon in candidacy for the degree of Master of Arts in Biblical Studies Department of Biblical Studies by Jackson Richardson October 25, 2019 Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................................1 Johannes Munck...................................................................................................................3 John Knox ............................................................................................................................3 J. M. Scott ............................................................................................................................4 Limitations/Delimitations ....................................................................................................6 Research Methods ................................................................................................................7 Proposed Development of Thesis ........................................................................................8 Results ................................................................................................................................11 Genesis 10 & 11 in Jewish Thought............................................................................................11 Influence of Genesis 10 & 11 in the Old Testament ..........................................................12
  • In Their Role As Geographers, the Old Testament Isra Elites Have Evoked

    In Their Role As Geographers, the Old Testament Isra Elites Have Evoked

    CALIFORNIA GEOGRAPHICAL SOCIETY Volume XXVII, 1987 THE GEOGRAPHICAL HORIZONS OF THE EARLY ISRAELITES: THE TABLE OF NATIONS REVISITED Gordon R. Lewthwaite In their role as geographers, the Old Testament Isra­ elites have evoked some rather different reactions. As Wright and Filson remarked, ''The Bible is unique among the world's scriptures; it is the only one for whose com­ prehension the study of historical geography is basic."l Indeed, Napoleon found the correlation of document and place so compelling that he had the appropriate scriptures read to him in situ throughout his Palestinian campaign.2 Yet, there are surprising lacunae: as Bal y and Tushing­ ham remarked, even the location of sacred Mount Sinai passed from Israel's memory.3 That fact, of course, reflects long severance from a region which was traversed but never settled; and at least until the Exile and far-flung Dispersion, most Israelite geography remained conspic­ uously close to home. A tally of identifiable Old Testa­ ment place names,4 however incomplete, indicates that fully 90 percent were located in the "Holy Land" itself (Figure 1). Yet, for all the allusions to natural phenomena, the regionally varying landscapes of even the homeland are seldom limned with geographical precision; and refer­ ences to distant lands are rarely coupled with an identi- ''Dr. Lewthwaite is Professor of Geography at California State University, N'Jrthridge. 39 40 THE CALIFORNIA GEOGRAPHER I I I ' I I I I I I I I I I L------- .......................... : ........... ...[� I I I MILES I '"" 500 -1 , 400 800 I I(IL0f\1llERS I I l Figure 1: Identifiable Places of the Old Testament fying phrase.
  • The Use of the Bible in George Eliot's Fiction Dissertation

    The Use of the Bible in George Eliot's Fiction Dissertation

    IAd) THE USE OF THE BIBLE IN GEORGE ELIOT'S FICTION DISSERTATION Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By Jesse C. Jones, B. A., M. A. Denton, Texas May, 1975 Copyright by Jesse C. Jones 1975 Jones, Jesse C., The Use of the Bible in Gem Eliot's Fiction. Doctor of Philosophy (English), May, 1975, 287 pp., bibliography, 143 titles. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate George Eliot's literary indebtedness to the Bible by isolating, identifying, and analyzing her various uses of Scripture in her novels. Chapter I is devoted to a statement of purpose and to an indication of overall organization. Chapter II traces George Eliot's acquisition of biblical knowledge through three stages: church attendance and familial influence during preschool years, the association with and influence of Evangelical teachers during the years of formal education, and finally the intense study of the Bible and related writings during the years following her schooling. Although her estimate of the Bible changed with the renunciation of Evangelical Christianity, George Eliot continued to read, revere, and draw upon the Bible throughout her career as a novelist. Chapter III demonstrates George Eliot's use of Bibles in Adam Bede and The Mill on the Floss for purposes of characteri- zation and symbolism. Characters who read the Bible provide both comic relief and serious thematic emphasis. In Chapters IV-VI, uses of biblical quotations, phrases, and allusions are analyzed. Quotations are few but effective: 1 2 they appear as epigraphs, serving as organic explications of the prefaced passages; they sharpen the characterization of such characters as Dinah Morris and Rufus Lyon; they occa- sionally provide humor.