DOCSLIB.ORG

Rapid Acquisition of Army Command and Control Systems

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rapid Acquisition of Army Command and Control Systems CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and EDUCATION AND THE ARTS decisionmaking through research and analysis. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from www.rand.org as a public service INFRASTRUCTURE AND of the RAND Corporation. TRANSPORTATION INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 NATIONAL SECURITY POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY Support RAND SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Purchase this document TERRORISM AND Browse Reports & Bookstore HOMELAND SECURITY Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND Arroyo Center View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non- commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This report is part of the RAND Corporation research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. Research Report Rapid Acquisition of Army Command and Control Systems Shara Williams, Jeffrey A. Drezner, Megan McKernan, Douglas Shontz, Jerry M. Sollinger C O R P O R A T I O N Research Report Rapid Acquisition of Army Command and Control Systems Shara Williams, Jeffrey A. Drezner, Megan McKernan, Douglas Shontz, Jerry M. Sollinger Prepared for the United States Army Approved for public release; distribution unlimited The research described in this report was sponsored by the United States Army under Contract No. W74V8H-06-C-0001. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN 978-0-8330-8510-8 The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND—make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute.html R® is a registered trademark. © Copyright 2014 RAND Corporation This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see the RAND permissions page (www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.html). RAND OFFICES SANTA MONICA, CA • WASHINGTON, DC PITTSBURGH, PA • NEW ORLEANS, LA • JACKSON, MS • BOSTON, MA CAMBRIDGE, UK • BRUSSELS, BE www.rand.org Preface In the last eight years, the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT, subsequently Overseas Contingency Operation or OCO), Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF), and Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) have all presented urgent technological challenges for the U.S. military. These challenges, particularly the use of improvised explosive device (IEDs), have forced the Department of Defense (DoD) to move material solutions through the acquisition lifecycle at unprecedented speed. This study examines how the Army can better manage systems acquired through nontraditional means (i.e., outside the process defined by DoDI 5000.02), focusing on command and control (C2) systems. The research identifies issues, challenges, and problems associated with nontraditional rapid acquisition processes and recommends ways for the DoD acquisition system to more rapidly develop, procure, and field effective C2 systems within the framework of current policies and processes. The research assesses past and current experience in the rapid acquisition of C2 systems through nontraditional means, including detailed case studies of three such systems. Those three case studies are published separately in a web-only companion document entitled Rapid Acquisition of Army C2 Systems: Case Studies, RR-210-A (not available to the general public). This research was performed over the period June 2009 through September 2010. Most of the data collection for the three case studies, including on-site interviews and review of official program documentation, occurred from August 2009 through May 2010, with some later revisions in the 2012–2013 time period. The main body of work in this document reflects information as of the earlier period. The findings should interest Program Offices, Program Executive Offices within the Army and the other military services, the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD), Congress, and contractors with an interest in doing business with DoD. This research was jointly sponsored by the Director, Acquisition and System Management, Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Logistics and Technology (ASA(ALT)); the Deputy Chief of Staff (DCS) Logistics (G-4); and the Director, Space and Missile Defense Battle Laboratory, Army Strategic Command. It was conducted within RAND Arroyo Center’s Force Development and Technology Program. RAND Arroyo Center, part of the RAND Corporation, is a federally funded research and development center sponsored by the United States Army. Questions about this report should be directed to the project lead, Jeffrey A. Drezner ([email protected]). Questions concerning RAND Arroyo Center’s Force Development and Technology Program should be directed toward its director, Chris Pernin ([email protected]). The Project Unique Identification Code (PUIC) for the project that produced this document is ASPMO09188. iii For more information on RAND Arroyo Center, contact the Director of Operations (telephone 310-393-0411, extension 6419; fax 310-451-6952; email [email protected]), or visit Arroyo’s web site at http://www.rand.org/ard.html. iv Contents Preface ................................................................................................................................ iii Figures............................................................................................................................... vii Tables ................................................................................................................................. ix Summary ............................................................................................................................ xi Acknowledgments .......................................................................................................... xxiii Glossary ...........................................................................................................................xxv 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................1 2. Case Studies .................................................................................................................13 3. Urgent Need, Rapid Acquisition, and Transition Processes ........................................39 4. Conclusions and Recommendations ............................................................................65 Appendix A. Joint/Army Rapid Capabilities and Materiel Developments Initiatives ......................75 Bibliography ......................................................................................................................99 v (This page is intentionally blank) vi Figures S.1. Study Motivation ................................................................................................ xii S.2. Factors Enabling Rapid Acquisition of Army C2 .............................................. xiv S.3. War Drives Many Factors Enabling Rapid Acquisition, and the Factors Influence Each Other ...........................................................................................xv S.4. Summary of Key Findings on Army Rapid Acquisition of C2 ......................... xvi S.5. Institutionalizing Rapid Acquisition Poses Both Challenges and Opportunities .................................................................................................... xviii S.6. Recommendations for the Army to Improve Rapid Acquisition of C2 ............. xix 1.1. Rapid Acquisition of Army C2 Systems ................................................................1 1.2. The Problem ...........................................................................................................2 1.3. Rapid Acquisitions of Command and Control Capabilities Face Challenges .......4 1.4. Study Objective ......................................................................................................6 1.5. Study Approach ....................................................................................................7 1.6. The Organization of This Report .........................................................................11
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DIGGER 70 Issue 70
    Tragedy in the 4th Division Heavy and Medium Trench Mortar Batteries Stephen Brooks, Barooga. ortars are simple but terrifyingly effective weapons, almost as old as gunpowder itself. They are relatively short-barrelled, most often smooth-bore weapons, that fire projectiles at a high angle at M relatively modest velocities. This makes for modest pressures and therefore relatively simple manufacture. The bombs are generally, but not always, fin stabilised, with a point detonating fuse. Heavy Medium Trench Mortar Batteries were manned by artillerymen. In the AIF during 1916 one heavy trench mortar battery was formed in each division, numbered VnA, where ‘V’ was the letter V and not the number 5, and ‘n’ was the division number. The three Medium Trench Mortar Batteries for each division were numbered XnA, YnA and ZnA. Thus the 4th Division Trench Mortar Batteries were named: ñ V4A Heavy Trench Mortar Battery ñ X4A Medium Trench Mortar Battery ñ Y4A Medium Trench Mortar Battery ñ Z4A Medium Trench Mortar Battery. Heavy Trench Mortar Batteries were each equipped with four 9.45 inch (240 mm) mortars. The medium mortars the Australians used were the 2-inch Medium Trench Mortar [right, armourersbench.com], which fired an over-bore bomb. ‘Over bore’ means the bomb was greater in diameter than the barrel. It was fitted into the barrel by means of a cylindrical spigot or rod. The bomb was described as a ‘toffee apple’ or ‘plum pudding’ bomb, weighing 23 kg. The medium mortar was a relatively short-barrelled weapon and had a heavy elevation and traversing gear mounted directly to the base plate.
    [Show full text]
  • From Balletics to Ballistics: French Artillery, 1897-1916
    FROM BALLETICS TO BALLISTICS: FRENCH ARTILLERY, 1897-1916 From Balletics to Ballistics: French Artillery, 1897-1916 JONATHAN KRAUSE* University of Wolverhampton Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT The fighting on the Western Front during the First World War was characterized by the mass use of artillery and, thanks to scholarship from recent decades, is now understood as a crucible for learning and innovation. This article follows the trajectory of French artillery capabilities, mental and mechanical, from the late 19th century through to 1916. Introduction The First World War, fundamentally, was an artillery war. Central to every tactical question was the use of artillery: that of the attacker and the defender. The reason for this is largely technological. With the development of accurate, quick-firing artillery field armies would possess an unprecedented level of firepower. The 1890s introduced an era in which massed infantry charges could be largely turned back by artillery alone. These modern field guns could, if they chose, engage their targets from four to six kilometres away, thus freeing them from the constraints of their counterparts in the 1860s and 1870s, whose shorter ranges exposed them to deadly small arms fire. Against this new killing power there was little that infantry could do; little, that is, except dig. Trenches have always provided soldiers with protection from firepower. The same basic principles which Vauban had perfected in the 17th Century remained of vital importance well into the 20th. That the war on the Western Front was essentially a siege operation of unprecedented complexity and duration was not lost on the leadership of the French army.
    [Show full text]
  • Next Generation Command and Control Wing Commander Ben Sharp
    FREEMAN AIR & SPACE INSTITUTE Next generation command and control Wing Commander Ben Sharp FREEMAN AIR & SPACE INSTITUTE Next generation command and control Wing Commander Ben Sharp About the author Abstract Wing Commander Ben Sharp is a RAF Engineer Since the Royal Air Force was formed, command Officer whose career has focused on enabling command and control doctrine, capabilities and procedures and control for British military operations, both in the have followed a steady path of development. Yet UK and whilst deployed worldwide. An advocate for warfare is becoming more complex, given it is being information-led decision making, he has led large teams fought in multiple operating domains across multiple of personnel and negotiated at an inter-governmental locations against a range of adversaries simultaneously. level to deliver information systems critical to supporting Commanders have an ever-greater need to prioritize the frontline personnel and theatre commanders alike. He will availability of timely and accurate information so they shortly (July 2019) graduate from the Defence Academy’s can make effective decisions about the employment Advanced Command and Staff Course and return to of their forces. This paper argues that as the Royal Air Headquarters Air Command to join the rapidly expanding Force steps towards becoming a next generation air team that is developing space capability for the RAF. force, additional investment in its command and control capability would allow this already essential aspect of air and space power to become its most important role. This paper results from the author receiving an invitation to consider and challenge current thinking around Royal Air Force Command and Control to stimulate debate on the subject.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Artillery During the Battle of the Somme, September-November 1916
    Canadian Military History Volume 26 Issue 2 Article 4 2017 “Our Artillery Would Smash It All Up:” Canadian Artillery During the Battle of the Somme, September-November 1916 Brendan Hogan Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/cmh Part of the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Hogan, Brendan "“Our Artillery Would Smash It All Up:” Canadian Artillery During the Battle of the Somme, September-November 1916." Canadian Military History 26, 2 (2017) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canadian Military History by an authorized editor of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Hogan: Our Artillery Would Smash It All Up “Our Artillery Would Smash It All Up” Canadian Artillery During the Battle of the Somme, September-November 1916 BRENDAN HOGAN Abstract : The historiography of the First World War has produced no recent comprehensive study of the Canadian artillery, despite its importance on the battlefield. This article seeks to explain how Canadian artillery evolved on the Somme. The central conclusions of this article are that the Canadian artillery’s performance during the battle was mixed, and that a number of technological, tactical, and organizational changes, not all of them Canadian, in the Canadian Corps that we recognize from the artillery of 1917-1918 were developed during, or as a result of, the Somme. ESCRIBING the disastrous attack on Regina Trench on 25 October D1916, Private J. Robinson of the 44th (Manitoba) Battalion Canadian Expeditionary Force (CEF) noted: [W]e were supposed to go over [the top] in the morning and we were told that this trench, we were told that our artillery would smash it all up and we got going over the top in the morning and there was nothing, you see, and they start falling around me like wheat and I lay in a shell hole all of one day with another fellow….
    [Show full text]
  • Front Lines Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    FRONT LINES PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Michael Grant | 480 pages | 28 Jan 2016 | Egmont UK Ltd | 9781405273824 | English | London, United Kingdom Front Lines PDF Book Terraine, John Griffiths, William R. Portugal from Alyona Shakhramanyan, 33, and her neighbors from the fifth floor of an apartment building in Shusha, the hilltop town, moved three weeks ago into a section of their dirt-floor basement. Sheldon, J. Rather than relying on a heavily fortified front line, the defence was to be arranged in a series of echelons. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Trench warfare in , while not new, quickly became much improved and provided a very high degree of defense. Biden, a new documentary interweaving investigative biographies of the two main-party presidential candidates, Donald Trump and Joe Biden, with a focus on how they have responded in moments of political and personal crisis. To break the deadlock of trench warfare on the Western Front, both sides tried new military technology , including poison gas , aircraft , and tanks. Whereas 'coronary' is no so much Put It in the 'Frunk' You can never have too much storage. The offensive proceeded poorly as the French troops, with the help of two Russian brigades , had to negotiate rough, upward-sloping terrain in extremely bad weather. Fuller, John F. They had calculated that a successful submarine and warship siege of Britain would force that country out of the war within six months, while American forces would take a year to become a serious factor on the Western Front. Grebler, L. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    [Show full text]
  • Lars Westerlund, the Finnish SS-Volunteers and Atrocities
    LARS WESTERLUND The Finnish SS-VOLUNTEERS AND ATROCITIES 1941–1943 SKS The Finnish SS-VOLUNTEERS AND ATROCITIES 1941–1943 LARS WESTERLUND THE FINNISH SS-VOLUNTEERS AND ATROCITIES against Jews, Civilians and Prisoners of War in Ukraine and the Caucasus Region 1941–1943 An Archival Survey Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura – Finnish Literature Society Kansallisarkisto – The National Archives of Finland Helsinki 2019 Steering Group Permanent State Under-Secretary Timo Lankinen, Prime Minister’s Office / Chair Research Director Päivi Happonen, The National Archives of Finland Director General Jussi Nuorteva, The National Archives of Finland Legal Adviser Päivi Pietarinen, Office of the President of the Republic of Finland Production Manager, Tiina-Kaisa Laakso-Liukkonen, Prime Minister’s Office / Secretary Project Group Director General Jussi Nuorteva, The National Archives of Finland / Chair Research Director Päivi Happonen, The National Archives of Finland / Vice-Chair Associate Professor Antero Holmila, University of Jyväskylä Dean of the Faculty of Law, Professor Pia Letto-Vanamo, University of Helsinki Professor Kimmo Rentola, University of Helsinki Academy Research Fellow Oula Silvennoinen, University of Helsinki Docent André Swanström, Åbo Akademi University Professor, Major General Vesa Tynkkynen, The National Defence University Professor Lars Westerlund Researcher Ville-Pekka Kääriäinen, The National Archives of Finland / Secretary Publisher’s Editor Katri Maasalo, Finnish Literature Society (SKS) Proofreading and translations William Moore Maps Spatio Oy Graphic designer Anne Kaikkonen, Timangi Cover: Finnish Waffen-SS troops ready to start the march to the East in May or early June 1941. OW Coll. © 2019 The National Archives of Finland and Finnish Literature Society (SKS) Kirjokansi 222 ISBN 978-951-858-111-9 ISSN 2323-7392 Kansallisarkiston toimituksia 22 ISSN 0355-1768 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License.
    [Show full text]
  • THE FIELD ARTILLERY JOURNAL General: (A) Full Use Must Be Made of Aerial Registration with a View to (I) Economy of Ammunition
    CURRENT FIELD ARTILLERY NOTES Wastage of German Artillery A SECRET report issued recently from the office of the Chief of the German Staff, signed by Ludendorff himself, shows the alarming losses of German artillery. It takes the form of an argument in reply to domestic criticisms, and on the technical points raised the old warrior has no great difficulty in justifying himself. For us the chief interest of the document lies in certain figures it contains. It stated that during grand operations the average number of guns lost by a single German army in a single month either by wear and tear or by enemy fire are to be found as follows: field guns, 870; heavy pieces, 585. This is a remarkable confession. A great industrial strain is the necessary result. The arsenals and workshops have had to make or repair pieces to the extent of three- quarters of the whole artillery establishment merely in order to keep up the existing strength. The industrial strain of such efforts makes it easy to understand why Ludendorff found it necessary to answer his German critics. Further, we have valuable statistical proof of the efficacy of the allied counter-battery work. Of an average of 1455 guns put out of action, it appears that 655 were lost by wear and tear, and 800 by the allied bombardments. Ludendorff offers his critics this figure by way of reply to their contentions that fire against the enemy's batteries is relatively unimportant and that it is only the bombardment of infantry that seriously matters. The reply is decisive.
    [Show full text]
  • Command, Control, and the Common Defense
    ii~!iiii~ii!~ii~!!!ii!,,,~~¸,¸,,.......... ~,~ ~i~,~,~,i~i~, C ¸ i;i !ii!il¸ ,, i ~ii i~iii'XdX~ ~i ~~ 2~;};~@~!Ci~i~x~;,~ ............ i~'t~~ ~'~IU r~, ~i ;~2i,;~iii~;*~ ~ x,;~Ci~ i i ii i/}} ~x ~i,o~, ;@i~ii'i~flilS;i!ii ¸ Critical Acclaim for the Original Edition of Command, Control, and the Common Defense • Winner of the 1991 Edgar S. Furniss Book Award given by the Mershon Center at Ohio State University, as an outstanding contribution to national security studies • Lead volume on the Chairman of the Joint Chief of Staff's professional military reading list (JCS Pub. l) "A definitive work from both a historical and practical viewpoint... A 'must read'." --Admiral William J. Crowe, Jr., U.S. Navy Ret.; former Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff "An exceptionally rich exploration of the historical as well as current dimensions of the [interservice] problem." --Russell F. Weigley, author of The American Way of War, in the Journal of American History "Those with responsibility for the organization and direction of United States defense.., ignore this book at their cost." --Martin Edmonds, American Political Science Review "[Allard] provides an unparalleled basis for assessing where we are and where we must go if we are to solve the joint and combined command and control challenges facing the U.S. military as it [makes a transition] to the twenty-first century." ----General Edward C. Meyer, U.S. Army Ret., former Chief of Staff, U.S. Army, Armed Forces Journal "Anyone who wants to be more than a dilettante in command and control must understand what Lt.
    [Show full text]
  • The Resilient Defense
    No. 100 MAY 2014 The Resilient Defense Raymond A. Millen The Resilient Defense by Raymond A. Millen The Institute of Land Warfare ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY AN INSTITUTE OF LAND WARFARE PAPER The purpose of the Institute of Land Warfare is to extend the educational work of AUSA by sponsoring scholarly publications, to include books, monographs and essays on key defense issues, as well as workshops and symposia. A work selected for publication as a Land Warfare Paper represents research by the author which, in the opinion of ILW’s editorial board, will contribute to a better understanding of a particular defense or national security issue. Publication as an Institute of Land Warfare Paper does not indicate that the Association of the United States Army agrees with everything in the paper but does suggest that the Association believes the paper will stimulate the thinking of AUSA members and others concerned about important defense issues. LAND WARFARE PAPER NO. 100, May 2014 The Resilient Defense by Raymond A. Millen Lieutenant Colonel Raymond A. Millen, USA Ret., completed three tours in Afghanistan, the last as a senior mentor to the Chief of Strategic Plans department in the Ministry of Defense. While on active duty, Professor Millen served as an infantry officer and foreign area officer for Western Europe. From 2001 to 2008, he was the Director of European Security Affairs at the Strategic Studies Institute. Professor Millen is currently the Security Sector Reform analyst at the Peacekeeping and Stability Operations Institute, Carlisle, Pennsylvania. He is the author of the books Command Legacy: A Tactical Primer for Junior Leaders and Burden of Command, as well as numerous articles and monographs on NATO, counterinsurgency, Afghanistan and Security Sector Reform issues.
    [Show full text]
  • How Defence Works
    Heading 2 Voluptua molestiae delicatissimi pri ea, quo illud praesent ex. Mea nibh Version 6.0 Sep 2020 necessitatibus te, modo volumus This document is issued and controlled by the Directorate of Sponsorship and Organisational Policy (DSOP). All comments and requests for amendments should be directed to DSOP at: [email protected] Foreword Defence makes a fundamental contribution to the government’s overall ability to safeguard national security. As part of this overall effort, the Ministry of Defence (MOD) works across Whitehall to develop the UK’s Defence policy, and also provides the means to deliver it though the generation and operation of Military Capability. These outputs are delivered through a complex array of activities, conducted dynamically by a variety of organisations within MOD, directed and cohered by its Head Office. This document explains for a lay reader what those activities are and how they are directed and cohered. It reflects adjustments to the Defence Operating Model, including the intent to: • work to a clearer overarching Defence Purpose; • improve Defence-wide planning and accountability processes; • clarify and strengthen governance within Head Office; • introduce Functional Leadership as a mechanism to ensure the coherence of cross- cutting activities, including with wider government policies on the delivery of supporting services; • build on the success of the former Joint Forces Command and to create Strategic Command, with added responsibilities for ensuring effective integration between the five military ‘domains’: Air, Land, Maritime, Space and Cyber; • implement new ‘sponsorship’ arrangements to allow MOD’s Enabling Organisations to operate effectively within Defence, but at ‘arm’s length’ from Head Office.
    [Show full text]
  • Battle Staff Ride for Sinimäid (The Blue Hills)
    DEDICATION UPON THE BACKS AND IN THE HANDS OF SO FEW RESTED THE HOPES AND DREAMS OF SO MANY. THE GRATIFYING WORK OF THE PROFESSIONAL SOLDIER IS PROPERLY MOURNED ONLY BY WE WHO KNEW THEM. ONLY THOSE WHO SUFFERED WITH ME EVER KNEW THE TRUE COST. THE AUTHOR FOR THE MEN OF COMPANY K, THIRD BATTALION, EIGHT MARINE REGIMENT RAMADI, IRAQ 16 MARCH 2006 TO 29 SEPTEMBER 2006 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION…………………………………………………………………………. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS……………………………………………………………… 3 PREFACE……………………………………………………………………………… 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS…………………………………………………………….. 6 POLITICAL AND STRATEGIC OVERVIEW…………………………………………………………………………… 7 THE GERMAN STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE NARVA FRONT………………………………………………………….. 11 THOUGHTS ON TERRAIN…………………………………………………………. 13 THOUGHTS ON WEATHER………………………………………………………... 15 TABLE OF ORGANIZATION AND TABLE OF EQUIPMENT INFORMATION FOR THE FIGHTING IN THE BLUE HILLS AREA………………………………………….. 17 OVERVIEW OF THE STAFF RIDE STANDS……………………………………...27 STAND 1- HERMANNSBURG CASTLE……………………………………………28 STANDS 2 AND 3 - SIIVERTSI AND RIIGIULA BRIDGEHEADS……………………………………………………………………….42 THE GERMAN METHOD FOR ESTIMATE OF THE SITUATION…………….55 STAND 4 - PEETERRISTI (PETER’S CROSSROADS)…………………………...60 STAND 5- KINDERHEIMHOHE…………………………………………………….67 STAND 6- ACTIONS AT GRENADIER HILL……………………………………...76 STAND 7- ACTIONS AT HILL 69.9………………………………………………….79 CONCLUSION…………………………………………………………………………85 APPENDIX A: GERMAN AND SOVIET TANKS AND GUN PENETRATION INFORMATION…………………………………………….86 3 PREFACE There is much written history for the military professional to read, but little is of value to his education. These works are often wonderful, but are too broad or narrow in scope, lacking the context to be of use for serious study. Military professionals are always quick to point out an “academic” wrote something, because it was too theoretic and lacked the practicality they seek. College professors likewise say military professionals write too much about their experiences or to secure their legacy in the form of memoirs.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Artillery Notes No
    10 NUMBER NOT TO BE TAKEN INTO FRONT-LINE TRENCHES Field Artillery Notes No. 7 ARMY WAR COLLEGE AUGUST, 1917 WASHINGTON 41834 GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1917 THE GENERAL" SERVICE SCHOOLS LIBRARY CLASS NUMBER HL$ '9 ACCESSION NUMBER -tL'r «/ii bnerah WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, August 23, 1917. The following pamphlet "Field Artillery Notes No. 7," is published for the information of all concerned. i;300.8 A. G. O.] ; BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF WAT; : II. L. SCOTT, Major General, Chief of Staff. OFFICIAL: H. p. MCCAIN, The Adjutant General. 3 WAR DEPARTMENT, THE ADJUTANT GENERAL'S OFFICE, Washington, June 19,1917. To all officers of the Army: You are advised that this and all subsequent documents of a similar character, which may be furnished to you from this office, are to be regarded as strictly confidential. They are to be kept at all times in your personal possession and are not to be copied nor are any parts of their contents to be communicated, either directly or indirectly, to the press nor to any persons not in the military or naval service of the United States. In Europe these documents are not to be carried into the front-line trenches nor farther to the front than the usual post of the officers to whom issued. Strict compliance with this injunction is enjoined upon every officer into whose hands any of these confidential documents may come. By order of the Secretary of War: H. P. MCCAIN, The Adjutant General. (4) TABLE OF CONTENTS. Ranging on the line of observation 7 Notes on meteorological telegrams to the Artillery 15 Notes for Artillery officers on shoots with aeroplane observa- tion 21 Notes on wireless 22 Notes on cooperation between aircraft and Artillery during recent operations on the second Army front 24 Stokes' trench howitzer 3-inch mark 1 29 Definition of terms used in the registration of zones and in trench warfare by Field Artillery 4.1 Supply of ammunition in the field 42 G.
    [Show full text]