DOCSLIB.ORG

A MUSE of FIRE British Trench Warfare Munitions, Their Invention, Manufacture and Tactical Employment on the Western Front, 1914–18

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A MUSE of FIRE British Trench Warfare Munitions, Their Invention, Manufacture and Tactical Employment on the Western Front, 1914–18 A MUSE OF FIRE British Trench Warfare Munitions, their Invention, Manufacture and Tactical Employment on the Western Front, 1914–18 Submitted by Anthony James Saunders to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History, September 2008. This thesis is available for library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other university. Anthony Saunders Abstract The emergence of static warfare on the Western Front in late 1914 encouraged the reinvention of devices associated with siege warfare and the invention of hitherto unknown munitions. These munitions included hand and rifle grenades and trench mortars and their ammunition. At the outbreak of war, the British effectively possessed none of these devices and lacked an infrastructure by which they could be quickly designed, manufactured and supplied to the British Expeditionary Force (BEF). The British met this challenge with considerable success. The subsequent proliferation of trench warfare munitions had profound consequences for the evolution of British tactics on the Western Front. This thesis examines the processes by which these devices were invented, developed into manufacturable devices and supplied to the BEF. It considers their novelty in respect to similar devices from the American Civil War and the Russo-Japanese War. It looks at how their technical evolution affected tactical developments. The thesis discusses the relationship between the technical characteristics of these devices and the evolution of their tactical employment. It also considers how the characteristics of certain munitions, such as the Stokes mortar and the Mills grenade, directly affected tactics. It argues that the tactical employment of these munitions was dependent upon their functionality, utility and reliability. The present thesis provides a different model of trench warfare conducted by the British on the Western Front and, thereby, demonstrates the significance of the novel munitions under discussion and the role they played in changing infantry warfare. This thesis also provides a different view of the Ministry of Munitions from that usually offered. It argues that certain aspects of the Ministry’s role in providing the BEF with munitions has been overstated in the standard interpretation of the Ministry’s work; the Ministry deliberately underplayed the work of the War Office, while overlooking that conducted by the Royal Engineers in France. 2 O! for a Muse of fire, that would ascend The brightest heaven of invention; A kingdom for a stage, princes to act And monarchs to behold the swelling scene. Then should the war-like Harry, like himself, Assume the port of Mars; and at his heels, Leash’d in like hounds, should famine, sword, and fire Crouch for employment. William Shakespeare, The Life of Henry the Fifth, Prologue, lines 1–8 Contents Abstract 2 List of figures 6 List of tables 8 Acknowledgements 9 1 Object and Scope 11 Technicalities, invention and novelty 15 The politics of invention 19 A question of anticipation 21 Prior publications 22 Sources, breadth and limitations 27 Summary of objects 29 2 Trench Warfare Munitions before 1914 35 Hand grenades c. 1500–1860 36 Innovation in the American Civil War, 1861–5 38 The Russo-Japanese War, 1904–05 41 Innovation in Manchuria 44 Consequences of the Russo-Japanese War 46 Commercial drive, 1905–14 49 Looking forwards 55 3 The Bureaucracy of Invention 63 The problem of novel munitions 64 Inventing a new process – handling novelty 66 Invention and design 70 Evolutions and convolutions of organisation 74 Royal Engineers 78 Towards a common goal 83 4 A Question of Engineering 93 Demand versus supply 93 Evaluating novel munitions 94 Manufacture and inspection 100 A multi-functional approach 104 Output 108 Engineering solutions 112 5 Inventing Grenades 124 Addressing the technical–tactical relationship 125 Grenade types 127 Utility of purpose 129 Lethality 135 Functionality and reliability 138 The impracticalities of percussion-fuzed grenades 145 Technical evolutions 149 6 Inventing the Trench Mortar 160 Types of mortar 161 Ammunition and propellants 163 Utility of purpose 166 Lethality and destructiveness 169 Functionality 171 Second-generation developments 176 The problem of fuzing 177 Evolution 182 7 The Evolution of Grenade Warfare 192 Handling procedures 193 Shooting a rifle grenade 197 Throwing techniques 199 Learning the art of bombing 200 The tactics of grenade warfare 207 The rise and fall of grenade warfare 214 8 The Tactical Employment of Mortars 223 Organisation and Drill 224 Battery positions and emplacements 228 Gunnery 234 Tactical roles of mortars 236 Tactical employment of the Stokes mortar 237 Training 244 Tactical maturity and the light mortar 245 9 Conclusions – Invention, Firepower and Mobility 252 Asking the right question 252 The question of novelty 256 The role of manufacture 260 Organisation and management 262 Inventors and inventions 266 Tactics and technology 268 A new model of infantry warfare 270 Glossary and Abbreviations 276 Sources and Bibliography 283 List of Figures Fig. 1 British improvised hand grenade from the siege of Mafeking, 1899 37 Fig. 2 Parlour’s hand grenade of c. 1834 38 Fig. 3 Ketchum hand grenades 39 Fig. 4 No. 19 hand grenade of 1917 39 Fig. 5 Drawings from Adams’s US patent, US45806 41 Fig. 6 Three hand grenades improvised by the Russians at Port Arthur 42 Fig. 7 Japanese soldier in Manchuria with a percussion-fuzed hand grenade 43 Fig. 8 Japanese light mortar used at Port Arthur 45 Fig. 9 No. 1 hand grenade 48 Fig. 10 Detailed drawings of the No. 1 48 Fig. 11 Military and naval attachés pose with Marten Hale at the Faversham works 49 Fig. 12 Leaflet advertising Marten Hale’s patented rifle grenade 51 Fig. 13 Marten Hale rifle grenade fitted with its rod 51 Fig. 14 Arming vane which was the cause of prematures 51 Fig. 15 Drawings from GB124837 98 Fig. 16 Engineering drawings of Newton Pippin hand grenade 105 Fig. 17 Captain Todhunter’s sketch of three novel devices invented by Newton 105 Fig. 18 3.7-inch Newton mortar, cast from SAA cartridge cases 113 Fig. 19 Output v. demand and cost over time for the Nos 3, 20 & 24 rifle grenades 115 Fig. 20 Output v. demand and cost over time for No. 5 and No. 23 Mills grenades 115 Fig. 21 Percussion-fuzed grenades with short handles 128 Fig. 22 Large fragments from a US hand grenade 136 Fig. 23 X-ray of a grenade wound of the shoulder 136 Fig. 24 Cast-iron body of the Pitcher 136 Fig. 25 Roland hand grenade 139 Fig. 26 Drawings from Roland’s Belgian patent of 1912 139 Fig. 27 Mills hand grenade as described in GB2468/15 140 Fig. 28 Differences between the No. 5 and No. 36 grenades 143 Fig. 29 Disassembled No. 5 and No. 36 grenades 143 Fig. 30 Cutaway of a No. 36 and its centrepiece 143 Fig. 31 Humphries, DG and Bellamy grenades 146 Fig. 32 Engineering drawings of experimental Bellamy egg grenade 148 Fig. 33 Evolution of the Hale type of rifle grenade 150 Fig. 34 Newton Pippin rifle grenade 150 Fig. 35 McClintock rifle grenade 151 Fig. 36 Engineering drawing of a stand for firing rifle grenades, 1915 151 Fig. 37 Woolwich 2-inch medium mortar 162 Fig. 38 9.45-inch heavy mortar 164 Fig. 39 6-inch Newton mortar with second-pattern guide rods 165 Fig. 40 3-inch Stokes mortar with second-pattern stand 167 Fig. 41 Bomb for the 3-inch Stokes mortar 174 Fig. 42 Striker and its relationship with the breech in 3-inch Stokes mortar 174 Fig. 43 Time fuze, adapted from the Mills mechanism, for 3-inch Stokes bombs 178 Fig. 44 No. 31 fuze 180 Fig. 45 No. 148 Mk I fuze 180 Fig. 46 No. 110 Mk II fuze derived from the No. 107 Newton fuze 180 Fig. 47 No. 107 fuze 181 Fig. 48 No. 146 fuze 181 Fig. 49 No. 105B fuze, a simple percussion mechanism 181 Fig. 50 No. 147 Vickery fuze with clip instead of tape 181 Fig. 51 Royal Engineer demonstrates correct position for firing cup discharger 198 Fig. 52 Correct stance for firing rodded Mills No. 23 198 Fig. 53 Correct stance for firing a rodded Mills from the shoulder 198 Fig. 54 Starting position for throwing a grenade 199 Fig. 55 Position after throwing a grenade from a deep trench 199 Fig. 56 Throwing a grenade from a kneeling position 199 Fig. 57 Throwing a grenade from a kneeling position 199 Fig. 58 Means of carrying grenades 202 Fig. 59 How to bomb along a trench as taught from early 1915 210 Fig. 60 Variations on the theme; how to negotiate an island traverse 210 Fig. 61 Trench block, 1917 210 Fig. 62 Improvement on the theme 210 Fig. 63 Attacking round traverses with rifle and bayonet 213 Fig. 64 Trench to trench attack, 1917 216 Fig. 65 Platoon tactics when attacking above ground to engage a strongpoint 216 Fig. 66 Australian Stokes mortar detachment demonstrating misfire drill 228 Fig. 67 Trench mortar battery positions 229 Fig. 68 2-inch mortar emplacement in the Middle East 230 Fig. 69 Double emplacement for medium mortars 230 Fig. 70 9.45-inch mortar emplacement 232 Fig. 71 Stokes mortar emplacement, June 1918 233 Fig. 72 Stokes mortar ammunition carriers, Ypres salient, August 1917 241 Fig. 73 Part of Stokes mortar detachment prepare ammunition for a shoot 241 Fig.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National World War I Museum 2008 Accessions to the Collections Doran L
    NATIONAL WORLD WAR I MUSEUM 2008 ACCESSIONS TO THE COLLECTIONS DORAN L. CART, CURATOR JONATHAN CASEY, MUSEUM ARCHIVIST All accessions are donations unless otherwise noted. An accession is defined as something added to the permanent collections of the National World War I Museum. Each accession represents a separate “transaction” between donor (or seller) and the Museum. An accession can consist of one item or hundreds of items. Format = museum accession number + donor + brief description. For reasons of privacy, the city and state of the donor are not included here. For further information, contact [email protected] or [email protected] . ________________________________________________________________________ 2008.1 – Carl Shadd. • Machine rifle (Chauchat fusil-mitrailleur), French, M1915 CSRG (Chauchat- Sutter-Ribeyrolles and Gladiator); made at the Gladiator bicycle factory; serial number 138351; 8mm Lebel cartridge; bipod; canvas strap; flash hider (standard after January 1917); with half moon magazine; • Magazine carrier, French; wooden box with hinged lid, no straps; contains two half moon magazines; • Tool kit for the Chauchat, French; M1907; canvas and leather folding carrier; tools include: stuck case extractor, oil and kerosene cans, cleaning rod, metal screwdriver, tension spring tool, cleaning patch holder, Hotchkiss cartridge extractor; anti-aircraft firing sight. 2008.2 – Robert H. Rafferty. From the service of Cpl. John J. Rafferty, 1 Co 164th Depot Brigade: Notebook with class notes; • Christmas cards; • Photos; • Photo postcard. 2008.3 – Fred Perry. From the service of John M. Figgins USN, served aboard USS Utah : Diary; • Oversize photo of Utah ’s officers and crew on ship. 2008.4 – Leslie Ann Sutherland. From the service of 1 st Lieutenant George Vaughan Seibold, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Night Operation on the Passchendaele Ridge, 2Nd December 1917
    Centre for First World War Studies A Moonlight Massacre: The Night Operation on the Passchendaele Ridge, 2nd December 1917 by Michael Stephen LoCicero Thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of History and Cultures College of Arts & Law June 2011 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract The Third Battle of Ypres was officially terminated by Field Marshal Sir Douglas Haig with the opening of the Battle of Cambrai on 20 November 1917. Nevertheless, a comparatively unknown set-piece attack – the only large-scale night operation carried out on the Flanders front during the campaign – was launched twelve days later on 2 December. This thesis, a necessary corrective to published campaign narratives of what has become popularly known as „Passchendaele‟, examines the course of events from the mid-November decision to sanction further offensive activity in the vicinity of Passchendaele village to the barren operational outcome that forced British GHQ to halt the attack within ten hours of Zero. A litany of unfortunate decisions and circumstances contributed to the profitless result.
    [Show full text]
  • To Examine the Horrors of Trench Warfare
    TRENCH WARFARE Objective: To examine the horrors of trench warfare. What problems faced attacking troops? What was Trench Warfare? Trench Warfare was a type of fighting during World War I in which both sides dug trenches that were protected by mines and barbed wire Cross-section of a front-line trench How extensive were the trenches? An aerial photograph of the opposing trenches and no-man's land in Artois, France, July 22, 1917. German trenches are at the right and bottom, British trenches are at the top left. The vertical line to the left of centre indicates the course of a pre-war road. What was life like in the trenches? British trench, France, July 1916 (during the Battle of the Somme) What was life like in the trenches? French soldiers firing over their own dead What were trench rats? Many men killed in the trenches were buried almost where they fell. These corpses, as well as the food scraps that littered the trenches, attracted rats. Quotes from soldiers fighting in the trenches: "The rats were huge. They were so big they would eat a wounded man if he couldn't defend himself." "I saw some rats running from under the dead men's greatcoats, enormous rats, fat with human flesh. My heart pounded as we edged towards one of the bodies. His helmet had rolled off. The man displayed a grimacing face, stripped of flesh; the skull bare, the eyes devoured and from the yawning mouth leapt a rat." What other problems did soldiers face in the trenches? Officers walking through a flooded communication trench.
    [Show full text]
  • Organization of the British Infantry Battalion 1938 to 1945
    1 Organization of the British Infantry Battalion 1938 to 1945 A www.bayonetstrength.uk PDF 1st draft uploaded 4th August 2018 2nd draft uploaded 2nd June 2019 Amendments include; 1. Updates to Signal Platoon wireless and line equipment (1943 to 1945). 2. Clarification on 6-pdr Anti-tank gun ammunition allocation. 3. Added Annex D on the Assault Pioneer Platoon (1943 to 1945). 4. Correction of a number of lamentable typos… www.bayonetstrength.uk Gary Kennedy August 2018 2 Contents Page i. Introduction 3 ii. British Army Ranks 4 iii. British Infantry Battalion structure and terminology 6 Overview 7 Evolution of the British Infantry Battalion (chart) 9 The elements of the Battalion 10 Annex A - Signal communication 31 Annex B - Weapons and ammunition 39 Annex C - The Lorried Infantry Battalion 49 Annex D - Assault Pioneer Platoon 51 Sources and acknowledgements 52 Still searching for… 55 www.bayonetstrength.uk Gary Kennedy August 2018 3 Introduction This is my attempt at analysing the evolving organization, equipment and weapons of the British Infantry Battalion during the Second World War. It covers three distinct periods in the development of the Infantry Battalion structure; the pre-war reorganization utilised in France in 1940, the campaign in North Africa that expanded into the Mediterranean and the return to Northwest Europe in 1944. What is not included is the British Infantry Battalion in the Far East, as sadly I have never been able to track down the relevant documents for the British Indian Army. As far as possible, the information included here is obtained from contemporary documents, with a list of sources and acknowledgements given at the end.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pistol in British Military Service During the Great War
    Centre for First World War Studies The Pistol in British Military Service during the Great War A dissertation submitted by David Thomas (SRN 592736) in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MA in British First World War Studies September 2010 1 Contents Introduction 3 Current Literature Review 3 Questions to be Addressed 5 Chapter One-Use and Issue 6 Chapter Two-Technique and Training 11 Accessories 14 Ammunition 16 Chapter Three-Procurement 18 History 18 Army Procurement 19 Royal Navy Procurement 23 Private Purchase 24 Overall Numbers 26 Conclusions. 26 Bibliography 28 Appendix 33 Acknowledgements 37 All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced in any form or by any means without the written permission of the author. 2 Introduction The British military services made considerable use of pistols during the Great War but it is evident that there is widespread ignorance and poor literary coverage of the weapons and their use. It is proposed to examine the pistol in British military service in the Great War, covering issue and use, technique and training, and procurement. Approximately half a million pistols were procured during the war, making it one of the numerically most widely issued weapons. A number of Corps, including the Machine Gun Corps, Tank Corps, and Royal Flying Corps were issued pistols as personal weapons, as well as extensive distribution in other arms. It is known that pistol use was widespread in trench warfare and critical on occasions. Decorations, including several Victoria Crosses, are recorded as being won by men using them aggressively.
    [Show full text]
  • Rules and Options
    Rules and Options The author has attempted to draw as much as possible from the guidelines provided in the 5th edition Players Handbooks and Dungeon Master's Guide. Statistics for weapons listed in the Dungeon Master's Guide were used to develop the damage scales used in this book. Interestingly, these scales correspond fairly well with the values listed in the d20 Modern books. Game masters should feel free to modify any of the statistics or optional rules in this book as necessary. It is important to remember that Dungeons and Dragons abstracts combat to a degree, and does so more than many other game systems, in the name of playability. For this reason, the subtle differences that exist between many firearms will often drop below what might be called a "horizon of granularity." In D&D, for example, two pistols that real world shooters could spend hours discussing, debating how a few extra ounces of weight or different barrel lengths might affect accuracy, or how different kinds of ammunition (soft-nosed, armor-piercing, etc.) might affect damage, may be, in game terms, almost identical. This is neither good nor bad; it is just the way Dungeons and Dragons handles such things. Who can use firearms? Firearms are assumed to be martial ranged weapons. Characters from worlds where firearms are common and who can use martial ranged weapons will be proficient in them. Anyone else will have to train to gain proficiency— the specifics are left to individual game masters. Optionally, the game master may also allow characters with individual weapon proficiencies to trade one proficiency for an equivalent one at the time of character creation (e.g., monks can trade shortswords for one specific martial melee weapon like a war scythe, rogues can trade hand crossbows for one kind of firearm like a Glock 17 pistol, etc.).
    [Show full text]
  • DIGGER 70 Issue 70
    Tragedy in the 4th Division Heavy and Medium Trench Mortar Batteries Stephen Brooks, Barooga. ortars are simple but terrifyingly effective weapons, almost as old as gunpowder itself. They are relatively short-barrelled, most often smooth-bore weapons, that fire projectiles at a high angle at M relatively modest velocities. This makes for modest pressures and therefore relatively simple manufacture. The bombs are generally, but not always, fin stabilised, with a point detonating fuse. Heavy Medium Trench Mortar Batteries were manned by artillerymen. In the AIF during 1916 one heavy trench mortar battery was formed in each division, numbered VnA, where ‘V’ was the letter V and not the number 5, and ‘n’ was the division number. The three Medium Trench Mortar Batteries for each division were numbered XnA, YnA and ZnA. Thus the 4th Division Trench Mortar Batteries were named: ñ V4A Heavy Trench Mortar Battery ñ X4A Medium Trench Mortar Battery ñ Y4A Medium Trench Mortar Battery ñ Z4A Medium Trench Mortar Battery. Heavy Trench Mortar Batteries were each equipped with four 9.45 inch (240 mm) mortars. The medium mortars the Australians used were the 2-inch Medium Trench Mortar [right, armourersbench.com], which fired an over-bore bomb. ‘Over bore’ means the bomb was greater in diameter than the barrel. It was fitted into the barrel by means of a cylindrical spigot or rod. The bomb was described as a ‘toffee apple’ or ‘plum pudding’ bomb, weighing 23 kg. The medium mortar was a relatively short-barrelled weapon and had a heavy elevation and traversing gear mounted directly to the base plate.
    [Show full text]
  • Mg 34 and Mg 42 Machine Guns
    MG 34 AND MG 42 MACHINE GUNS CHRIS MC NAB © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com MG 34 AND MG 42 MACHINE GUNS CHRIS McNAB Series Editor Martin Pegler © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 DEVELOPMENT 8 The ‘universal’ machine gun USE 27 Flexible firepower IMPACT 62 ‘Hitler’s buzzsaw’ CONCLUSION 74 GLOSSARY 77 BIBLIOGRAPHY & FURTHER READING 78 INDEX 80 © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com INTRODUCTION Although in war all enemy weapons are potential sources of fear, some seem to have a deeper grip on the imagination than others. The AK-47, for example, is actually no more lethal than most other small arms in its class, but popular notoriety and Hollywood representations tend to credit it with superior power and lethality. Similarly, the bayonet actually killed relatively few men in World War I, but the sheer thought of an enraged foe bearing down on you with more than 30cm of sharpened steel was the stuff of nightmares to both sides. In some cases, however, fear has been perfectly justified. During both world wars, for example, artillery caused between 59 and 80 per cent of all casualties (depending on your source), and hence took a justifiable top slot in surveys of most feared tools of violence. The subjects of this book – the MG 34 and MG 42, plus derivatives – are interesting case studies within the scale of soldiers’ fears. Regarding the latter weapon, a US wartime information movie once declared that the gun’s ‘bark was worse than its bite’, no doubt a well-intentioned comment intended to reduce mounting concern among US troops about the firepower of this astonishing gun.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lewis Gun (Pennsylvania Military Museum, T
    PMM BLOG ARCHIVE August 12, 2020 The Lewis Gun (Pennsylvania Military Museum, T. Gum, Site Admin.) At the start of World War I, American forces relied upon British and French armaments until state-side manufacturing was able to meet demands. One particular arm that would become a viable option for use on land and by air, was the Lewis Gun, better known as the Lewis Machine Gun. Photo of soldier, MM2019.17.26 Pictured here is a member of the 28th Division along the southern border training on a Lewis Machine Gun prior to deploying to France in 1916. Invented by Issac Newton Lewis (COL., US ARMY) in 1911, and mass produced by two companies, the Birmingham Small Arms Company (BSA) and Savage Arms, it is estimated that more than 300,000 were produced from 1913 to 1942. Despite it being realized before WWI broke out, it would take until 1914 for it to be widely produced and dispersed to ally units. Photo of Lewis Machine Gun. Weighing nearly thirty pounds and providing a rate of fire of 500-600 rounds per minute, it is considered a light machine gun being chambered in four possible rounds, two of which being the 30.06 and the British .303. Perhaps its most recognizable features include the aluminum barrel shroud that assisted with cooling, and the large ammunition “pan” on its top. A number of military historians attribute the Lewis not being as broadly used as it could have been by American forces to a number of differences between US military leadership and the gun’s inventor, though it was officially adopted by the US Navy and Marines in 1917.
    [Show full text]
  • 1892-1929 General
    HEADING RELATED YEAR EVENT VOL PAGE ABOUKIR BAY Details of HM connections 1928/112 112 ABOUKIR BAY Action of 12th March Vol 1/112 112 ABUKLEA AND ABUKRU RM with Guards Camel Regiment Vol 1/73 73 ACCIDENTS Marine killed by falling on bayonet, Chatham, 1860 1911/141 141 RMB1 marker killed by Volunteer on Plumstead ACCIDENTS Common, 1861 191286, 107 85, 107 ACCIDENTS Flying, Captain RISK, RMLI 1913/91 91 ACCIDENTS Stokes Mortar Bomb Explosion, Deal, 1918 1918/98 98 ACRE, SORTIE FROM (1799) Death of Major Oldfield Vol 1/111 111 ACRE, SORTIE FROM (1799) Turkish Medal awarded to C/Sgt W Healey 1901/122 122 ACRE, SORTIE FROM (1799) Ball at Plymouth in 1804 to commemorate 1905/126 126 ACRE, SORTIE FROM (1799) Death of a Veteran 1907/83 83 ACRE, SORTIE FROM (1799) Correspondence 1928/119 119 ACRE, SORTIE FROM (1799) Correspondence 1929/177 177 ACRE, SORTIE FROM (1799) 1930/336 336 ACRE, SORTIE FROM (1799) Syllabus for Examination, RMLI, 1893 Vol 1/193 193 ACRE, SORTIE FROM (1799) of Auxiliary forces to be Captains with more than 3 years Vol 3/73 73 ACTON, MIDDLESEX Ex RM as Mayor, 1923 1923/178 178 ADEN HMS Effingham in 1927 1928/32 32 See also COMMANDANT GENERAL AND GENERAL ADJUTANT GENERAL OFFICER COMMANDING of the Channel Fleet, 1800 1905/87 87 ADJUTANT GENERAL Change of title from DAGRM to ACRM, 1914 1914/33 33 ADJUTANT GENERAL Appointment of Brigadier General Mercer, 1916 1916/77 77 ADJUTANTS "An Unbroken Line" - eight RMA Adjutants, 1914 1914/60, 61 60, 61 ADMIRAL'S REGIMENT First Colonels - Correspondence from Lt.
    [Show full text]
  • From Balletics to Ballistics: French Artillery, 1897-1916
    FROM BALLETICS TO BALLISTICS: FRENCH ARTILLERY, 1897-1916 From Balletics to Ballistics: French Artillery, 1897-1916 JONATHAN KRAUSE* University of Wolverhampton Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT The fighting on the Western Front during the First World War was characterized by the mass use of artillery and, thanks to scholarship from recent decades, is now understood as a crucible for learning and innovation. This article follows the trajectory of French artillery capabilities, mental and mechanical, from the late 19th century through to 1916. Introduction The First World War, fundamentally, was an artillery war. Central to every tactical question was the use of artillery: that of the attacker and the defender. The reason for this is largely technological. With the development of accurate, quick-firing artillery field armies would possess an unprecedented level of firepower. The 1890s introduced an era in which massed infantry charges could be largely turned back by artillery alone. These modern field guns could, if they chose, engage their targets from four to six kilometres away, thus freeing them from the constraints of their counterparts in the 1860s and 1870s, whose shorter ranges exposed them to deadly small arms fire. Against this new killing power there was little that infantry could do; little, that is, except dig. Trenches have always provided soldiers with protection from firepower. The same basic principles which Vauban had perfected in the 17th Century remained of vital importance well into the 20th. That the war on the Western Front was essentially a siege operation of unprecedented complexity and duration was not lost on the leadership of the French army.
    [Show full text]
  • Next Generation Command and Control Wing Commander Ben Sharp
    FREEMAN AIR & SPACE INSTITUTE Next generation command and control Wing Commander Ben Sharp FREEMAN AIR & SPACE INSTITUTE Next generation command and control Wing Commander Ben Sharp About the author Abstract Wing Commander Ben Sharp is a RAF Engineer Since the Royal Air Force was formed, command Officer whose career has focused on enabling command and control doctrine, capabilities and procedures and control for British military operations, both in the have followed a steady path of development. Yet UK and whilst deployed worldwide. An advocate for warfare is becoming more complex, given it is being information-led decision making, he has led large teams fought in multiple operating domains across multiple of personnel and negotiated at an inter-governmental locations against a range of adversaries simultaneously. level to deliver information systems critical to supporting Commanders have an ever-greater need to prioritize the frontline personnel and theatre commanders alike. He will availability of timely and accurate information so they shortly (July 2019) graduate from the Defence Academy’s can make effective decisions about the employment Advanced Command and Staff Course and return to of their forces. This paper argues that as the Royal Air Headquarters Air Command to join the rapidly expanding Force steps towards becoming a next generation air team that is developing space capability for the RAF. force, additional investment in its command and control capability would allow this already essential aspect of air and space power to become its most important role. This paper results from the author receiving an invitation to consider and challenge current thinking around Royal Air Force Command and Control to stimulate debate on the subject.
    [Show full text]