DOCSLIB.ORG

UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The History of Predicative Possession in Slavic: Internal Development vs. Language Contact Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/23r8p63b Author McAnallen, Julia Publication Date 2011 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California The History of Predicative Possession in Slavic: Internal Development vs. Language Contact By Julia McAnallen A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Slavic Languages and Literatures in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Johanna Nichols, Chair Professor Alan Timberlake Professor Richard Rhodes Spring 2011 ! ! Abstract The History of Predicative Possession in Slavic: Internal Development vs. Language Contact by Julia McAnallen Doctor of Philosophy in Slavic Languages and Literatures University of California, Berkeley Professor Johanna Nichols, Chair The languages of the world encode possession in a variety of ways. In Slavic languages, possession on the level of the clause, or predicative possession, is represented by two main encoding strategies. Most Slavic languages, including those in the West and South Slavic sub- groupings, use a ‘have’ verb comparable to English have and German haben. But Russian, an East Slavic language, encodes predicative possession only infrequently with its ‘have’ verb imet'; instead, Russian uses a construction for predicative possession originating in a locative phrase, e.g. u menja est' kniga, which literally means ‘at me is a book’ for ‘I have a book’. This locative construction for predicative possession in Russian is often singled out as an aberrant construction in Slavic and attributed to contact-induced influence from Finnic languages. The opposite point of view is also put forth: that the locative construction for predicative possession in Russian is the original construction inherited from Late Proto-Slavic and the ‘have’ verb used in other Slavic languages is merely a calque from Greek. Neither explanation is entirely satisfactory. As a matter of fact, early Slavic textual traditions, based on a comparison of textual examples from Old Church Slavic, Old Serbian and Croatian, Old Czech, and Early East Slavic, reveal that both a ‘have’ verb and a locative construction for predicative possession were used in Late Proto-Slavic, alongside a third construction with the possessor encoded in the dative case. The present-day distribution of encoding strategies in the Slavic languages is explained by tracing the different textual and population histories for multiple areas of Slavdom. Contacts with neighboring languages, especially neighboring non-Slavic languages, over the course of history influenced predicative possessive constructions (PPCs) in all areas of Slavdom. Because the Slavic languages spread rather rapidly over a vast geographic expanse, covering most of Eastern Europe in a matter of a few centuries in the latter half of the first millennium CE, the languages that different Slavic populations came into contact with were often quite different. In particular, languages in the western end of Slavdom were in contact with German-speaking populations to varying degrees of intensity; in the northeastern end of Slavdom, Early East ! 1 Slavic assimilated and lived alongside large numbers of originally Finnic-speaking populations, who spoke languages closely related to Modern Finnish and Estonian. In short, each Slavic language expanded usage of one of the three original encoding strategies for predicative possession already attested in Late Proto-Slavic and the encoding strategy that expanded brought it closer to usage in neighboring and historically substrate non-Slavic languages. Not only the form of the PPCs themselves came to parallel usage in neighboring non- Slavic languages, but the morphosyntactic and semantic properties of the Slavic constructions also converged with the PPCs used in areal languages. Additional support for the scenarios put forth in this dissertation comes from examination of factors outside the domain of predicative possession, including linguistic features other than predicative possession, textual histories and considerations of language standardization in different areas, socio-historical factors, and demographic factors. While this dissertation traces the development of one grammatical category – predicative possession – in the history of Slavic, the scenarios outlined are meant to contribute more generally to an understanding of linguistic change in the history of Slavic and how those changes reflect the influence of population processes on shaping the path of historical linguistic change. ! 2 To the memory of my grandmother, Helen Chudy McNamara, and the memory of my father, Thomas James Close ! i TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................................v! List of abbreviations ..................................................................................................................... vii! Introduction....................................................................................................................................1! Chapter 1: Predicative possession in Old Church Slavic Bible translations............................9! 2. Examples of Predicative Possession in OCS Bible Translations...........................................10! 2.1. Divergence Type A: Greek PPC ! No PPC in OCS.....................................................12! 2.2. Divergence Type B: Greek PPC ! Different PPC in OCS ...........................................13! 2.3. Divergence Type C: No PPC in Greek ! PPC in OCS .................................................14! 2.4. Syntax of PPC Divergences............................................................................................17! 3. Semantics and Pragmatics of PPCs in Early Slavic Bible Translations ................................17! 3.1. U + genitive PPC ............................................................................................................17! 3.2. Dative PPC......................................................................................................................21! 3.3. Im!ti ‘Have’....................................................................................................................23! 3.4. Summary of Semantic range of Slavic PPCs..................................................................23! 4. Summary................................................................................................................................24! Chapter 2: Not just the story of mít ‘have’: The history of predicative possession in Czech .......................................................................................................................................................25! 1. Survey of Problem .................................................................................................................25! 2. Predicative Possession in Early Czech Bible Translations....................................................26! 3. Comparison of Bible examples with a literary text: "ivot Svaté Kate#iny ............................34! 4. Germans and their language in Czech lands..........................................................................36! 5. Concluding Remarks .............................................................................................................37! Chapter 3: Predicative possession in Early East Slavic ...........................................................39! 2. Previous Literature.................................................................................................................41! 2.1. General Discussion .........................................................................................................41! 2.2. Studies in the semantics of PPCs in the history of Russian............................................42! 3. Special Problems in the Semantics of Predicative Possession in EES ..................................44! 4. Survey of Predicative Possession in Early East Slavic Texts................................................50! 5. Predicative Possession in Povest' vremennyx let ‘The Russian Primary Chronicle’.............51! 5.1. Im!ti in the PVL..............................................................................................................52! 5.2. U + genitive PPC in the PVL..........................................................................................53! 5.3. Dative PPC in the PVL...................................................................................................56! 6. Predicative Possession in Moskovskij Letopisnij Svod ‘The Moscow Chronicle’.................59! 7. Early East Slavic Legal texts: Russkaja Pravda and Sudebnik of 1497................................61! 8. Predicative Possession in Old Novgorodian Birchbark Letters.............................................64! 9. The Muscovy or “Middle Russian” period............................................................................68! 9.1. Domostroj .......................................................................................................................68! ! ii 9.3. Tönnies Fenne’s Low German Manual of Spoken Russian, Pskov 1607.......................70! 9.4. Avvakum.........................................................................................................................71!
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The French Language in Russia in French Language The
    8 LANGUAGES AND CULTURE IN HISTORY Offord, Rjéoutski & Argent The Language French in Russia Derek Offord, Vladislav Rjéoutski, and Gesine Argent The French Language in Russia A Social, Political, Cultural, and Literary History The French Language in Russia Languages and Culture in History This series studies the role foreign languages have played in the creation of the linguistic and cultural heritage of Europe, both western and eastern, and at the individual, community, national or transnational level. At the heart of this series is the historical evolution of linguistic and cultural policies, internal as well as external, and their relationship with linguistic and cultural identities. The series takes an interdisciplinary approach to a variety of historical issues: the diffusion, the supply and the demand for foreign languages, the history of pedagogical practices, the historical relationship between languages in a given cultural context, the public and private use of foreign languages – in short, every way foreign languages intersect with local languages in the cultural realm. Series Editors Willem Frijhoff, Erasmus University Rotterdam Karène Sanchez-Summerer, Leiden University Editorial Board Members Gerda Hassler, University of Potsdam Douglas A. Kibbee, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Marie-Christine Kok Escalle, Utrecht University Joep Leerssen, University of Amsterdam Nicola McLelland, The University of Nottingham Despina Provata, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Konrad Schröder, University of Augsburg Valérie Spaëth, University of Paris III: Sorbonne Nouvelle Javier Suso López, University of Granada Pierre Swiggers, KU Leuven The French Language in Russia A Social, Political, Cultural, and Literary History Derek Offord, Vladislav Rjéoutski, and Gesine Argent Amsterdam University Press Cover illustration: Front page of Gazette de St.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter of the Institute of Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies
    ISSN 1536-4003 University of California, Berkeley Newsletter of the Institute of Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies Spring 2013 Notes from the Director Volume 30, Number 1 In this issue: Dear Friends and Colleagues, Notes from the Director .................... 1 Sadly, the most significant event of the spring was the passing, Edward W. Walker at the age of sixty-eight, of our dear colleague, Viktor Zhivov. Viktor was Bread and Circus: Putin and the Sochi Olympics ......................................... 3 – effortlessly and simultaneously – a linguist, historian, literary scholar, Giving Opportunities ....................... 12 sociologist of religion, and prominent public intellectual. He specialized Associates of the Slavic Center ...... 13 in ten centuries of Russian culture and taught at multiple universities in Spring 2013 Courses ...................... 14 Italy, Germany, Russia, and the United States. He was a famously generous Campus Visitors ............................. 15 Sarah Cramsey mentor and a close friend to many of us. At the time of his death, he had A True Polish Jew? Jewish-Gentile just completed a magisterial two-volume history of the Russian literary Coexistence in Ber of Bolechów’s language. His manuscript on the history of sin and salvation in Russia Memoirs ........................................ 16 Faculty and Student News.............. 22 remains unfinished. He will be impossible to replace and a tremendous, In Memoriam: everlasting joy to remember. Viktor Markovich Zhivov ............... 23 Carnegie
    [Show full text]
  • EARLY MODERN RUSSIAN LETTERS: Texts and Contexts
    EARLY MODERN RUSSIAN LETTERS: Texts and Contexts i Studies in Russian and Slavic Literatures, Cultures and History Series Editor: Lazar Fleishman EARLY MODERN RUSSIAN LETTERS: Texts and Contexts Selected Essays by Marcus C. Levitt Boston 2009 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Levitt , Marcus C., 1954- Early modern Russian lett ers : texts and contexts : selected essays / by Marcus C. Levitt . p. cm. — (Studies in Russian and Slavic literatures, cultures and history) ISBN 978-1-934843-68-0 1. Russian literature — 18th century — History and criticism. 2. Sumarokov, Aleksandr Petrovich, 1717-1777 — Criticism and interpretation. I. Title. PG3007.L48 2009 891.709’002—dc22 2009038955 Copyright © 2009 Academic Studies Press All rights reserved ISBN 978-1-934843-68-0 Book design by Ivan Grave Published by Academic Studies Press in 2009 28 Montfern Avenue Brighton, MA 02135, USA [email protected] www.academicstudiespress.com Effective December 12th, 2017, this book will be subject to a CC-BY-NC license. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. Other than as provided by these licenses, no part of this book may be reproduced, transmitted, or displayed by any electronic or mechanical means without permission from the publisher or as permitted by law. The open access publication of this volume is made possible by: This open access publication is part of a project supported by The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Humanities Open Book initiative, which includes the open access release of several Academic Studies Press volumes. To view more titles available as free ebooks and to learn more about this project, please visit borderlinesfoundation.org/open.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Alan Timberlake Contacts Dept. of Slavic Lgs. & Lits
    Curriculum vitae Alan Timberlake Contacts Dept. of Slavic Lgs. & Lits. 708 Hamilton Hall, mc 2839 Columbia University 1130 Amsterdam Avenue New York NY 10027 phone (212)-854-3451, FAX (212)-854-5009; e-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] (W08) Education 1964–68 Harvard College, B.A., Slavic Languages 1968–73 Harvard University, Ph.D., Linguistics. Employment 1972–1987 University of California at Los Angeles, Slavic Lgs. & Lits. 1987–2008 University of California at Berkeley, Slavic Lgs. & Lits. 2008— Professor & Chair, Columbia University, Slavic Lgs. & Lits. 2001 Visiting Professor, Stanford University, Slavic Lgs. & Lits. (W01, S01) 2003 Visiting Professor, Stanford University, Slavic Lgs. & Lits. (W03, S03) 2004 Visiting Professor, Columbia University (F04) 2005 Visiting Professor, Stanford University (W05, S05) 2006 Visiting Professor, Columbia University (F06) 2005 Visiting Professor, Stanford University (W07) 2007 Visiting Professor, Columbia University (F06) Grants and Fellowships 1987–88 “Grammar and Text,” Fellowship for University Teachers, National Endowment for the Humanities 1993 Johnson Fellow, University of Surrey, England 1996–97 “Synthetic Russian Grammar,” President’s Research Fellowship in the Humanities, University of California 1996–97 “Synthetic Russian Grammar,” Humanities Research Fellowship, University of California at Berkeley 2005–6 “Old Russian Chronicles,” Humanities Research Fellowship, University of California at Berkeley Service to the Department and University Chair, Slavic Lgs. & Lits, University of California at Los Angeles (1984–1987) Chair, Slavic Lgs. & Lits, University of California at Berkeley (1991–1996, S2003, 2003–4, Sm 2007) Chair, Slavic Lgs. & Lits, Columbia University (2008—) Humanities Research Fellowship review committee, UCB (1998–2001), chair (1999, 2000, 2001) University graduate fellowship committees (Title VI; Humanities, various years) Graduate adviser, Slavic Lgs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tartu-Moscow School of Semiotics: a Transnational Perspective
    368 Igor Pilshchikov, Mikhail Trunin Sign Systems Studies 44(3), 2016, 368–401 The Tartu-Moscow School of Semiotics: A transnational perspective Igor Pilshchikov, Mikhail Trunin School of Humanities Tallinn University Uus-Sadama 5, M-320, Tallinn 10120, Estonia e-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract: This paper seeks to situate the Tartu-Moscow School of Semiotics of the 1960– 1980s within the larger European intellectual-historical context from which it sprang, and in which it played a vital role. Analysing the school members’ engagement with their peers throughout Europe, we outline an “entangled history” (histoire croisée) of multi-directional scientific and philosophical influence. In this perspective, we discuss the most productive concepts and methods of Tartu-Moscow semiotics in the fields of general verse theory, intertextual theory and cultural theory. Keywords: Juri Lotman; Tartu-Moscow School of Semiotics; histoire croisée 1. The history and cultural functions of semiotics in Central and East European countries were drastically different from those in North America where this science was born (M. Lotman 2013: 262; Chernov 1988: 12; Ivanov 2013: 12). The development of Russian formalism and Prague structuralism lead to total restructuring of the field of literary and cultural studies, so the place which was earlier occupied by general aesthetics was now occupied by semiotics that later would develop into a general theory of culture. Thus, in Europe (and especially in the Tartu School), the semiotics of artistic text and semiotics of culture became the most important branches of the study of signs and sign systems (Chernov 1972; Lachmann 1987; Eimermacher 1987; Torop 1999; M.
    [Show full text]
  • EXHIBITION of the ACADEMIC RESEARCH ACHIEVEMENTS at EUSP 2009, December 4-5 European University at Saint Petersburg, Gagarinskaia Street, 3 Conference Program
    EXHIBITION OF THE ACADEMIC RESEARCH ACHIEVEMENTS AT EUSP 2009, December 4-5 European University at Saint Petersburg, Gagarinskaia Street, 3 Conference Program December 4, Friday 9:30-10:00 – регистрация участников 9:30-10:00—Participant registration 10:00-10:50—Conference opening, remarks by rector Oleg Kharkhordin Activity modules 10:15-11:45 White Hall “Archives and Society: Contemporary Legislation and Law En- forcement Practice” Moderator: Boris Kolonitsky (EUSP) Galina Lisitsyna (EUSP) “Unpopular Traditions and Double Standards” Tatiana Khorkhordina (Russian State University for the Humanities) “Archives and Society: A History of Problems” Sergei Mironenko (State Archive of the Russian Federation) “Contemporary Archival Legisla- tion and Law Enforcement Practices” Olga Leontieva (Archival Department of Tverskaia Region Administration) “Confidential Infor- mation: Legislative Contradictions and Archival Practices) 11:45-12:00 Coffee break 12:00-1:30 White Hall “The Intellectual Heritage of the 1917 Revolution” Moderator—Artemy Magun (EUSP) Artemy Magun (EUSP) “The Event and its Heritage. The Revolution of 1917 and Contempo- rary Russian Culture” Oksana Timofeeva (New Literary Observer): “The Revolutionary Animal of Andrei Platonov” Leonid Tereschenkov (Petrozavodsk State University) “The Establishing of the Research Methodologies of the Revolution in the Work of the Committee for the History of the October Revolution and the Bolshevik Party (1920–1924)” Ilya Kalinin (Smolny College-EUSP) “Socialist Formalism: The Artist as Tradesman/The
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Complete Bibliography of V. M. Zhivov
    Вивлioѳика: E-Journal of Eighteenth-Century Russian Studies, Vol. 2 (2014): 82-122 __________________________________________________________________________________________ Towards a Complete Bibliography of V. M. Zhivov Ernest A. Zitser Duke University [email protected] _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Abstract: Составление полной библиографии научных работ В.М. Живова – это масштабное предприятие, которое, несомненно, потребует совместных усилий библиотекарей и ученых, представляющих множество различных стран и академических дисциплин. Библиография, помещаемая ниже, призвана лишь представить некоторые дополнения и исправления к “Списку научных трудов Виктора Марковича Живова,” опубликованному в Веренице литер (2006) и довести этот список до настоящего времени. Включение дополнительных публикаций—как перепечаток и переводов, так и оригинальных научных работ—будет полезно для будущих исследователей, особенно интересующихся направлением развития идей Живова, их влиянием и каналами их распространения. По той же причине, настоящая библиография также включает ссылки на интервью и публичные лекции Живова и его выступления на радио и телевидении, в том числе те, которые в настоящее время доступны только в Интернете. Хотя включение таких работ, как правило, размывает традиционные границы между академическими и научно-популярными публикациями, оно иллюстрирует характер современного информационного ландшафта и позволяет документировать деятельность Живова как публичного интеллектуала.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Predicative Possession in Slavic: Internal Development Vs. Language Contact by Julia Mcanallen a Dissertation
    The History of Predicative Possession in Slavic: Internal Development vs. Language Contact By Julia McAnallen A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Slavic Languages and Literatures in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Johanna Nichols, Chair Professor Alan Timberlake Professor Richard Rhodes Spring 2011 ! ! Abstract The History of Predicative Possession in Slavic: Internal Development vs. Language Contact by Julia McAnallen Doctor of Philosophy in Slavic Languages and Literatures University of California, Berkeley Professor Johanna Nichols, Chair The languages of the world encode possession in a variety of ways. In Slavic languages, possession on the level of the clause, or predicative possession, is represented by two main encoding strategies. Most Slavic languages, including those in the West and South Slavic sub- groupings, use a ‘have’ verb comparable to English have and German haben. But Russian, an East Slavic language, encodes predicative possession only infrequently with its ‘have’ verb imet'; instead, Russian uses a construction for predicative possession originating in a locative phrase, e.g. u menja est' kniga, which literally means ‘at me is a book’ for ‘I have a book’. This locative construction for predicative possession in Russian is often singled out as an aberrant construction in Slavic and attributed to contact-induced influence from Finnic languages. The opposite point of view is also put forth: that the locative construction for predicative possession in Russian is the original construction inherited from Late Proto-Slavic and the ‘have’ verb used in other Slavic languages is merely a calque from Greek.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Editors: in Memoriam: Viktor Markovich Zhivov (1945-2013)1 __
    Вивлiоѳика: E-Journal of Eighteenth-Century Russian Studies, Vol. 2 (2014): i-vi __________________________________________________________________________________________ From the Editors: In Memoriam: Viktor Markovich Zhivov (1945-2013)1 _________________________________________________________ Abstract: Этот выпуск журнала «Вивлиофика» является первым из серии выпусков, посвященных памяти и интеллектуальному влиянию Виктора Марковича Живова (1945-2013) на исследователей России 18 в. и русской культуры вообще. Среди авторов этого и последующих выпусков – коллеги, ученики, друзья, соавторы Виктора Марковича. Выпуск включает ряд статей, разрабатывающих разные аспекты изучения России 18 в., которые были близки и В.М. Живову, такие как карнавальная культура петровского времени (Б.А. Успенский), политическая идеология петровского двора и фигура Феофана Прокоповича (Б.П. Маслов), религия в творчестве Державина (И. Клейн), история лингвистической культуры людей 18 в. на примере «Vocabularia comparativa» (Х. Кайперт). Этот номер журнала также включает оригинальный перевод одной из последних статей В.М. Живова, посвященной истории понятий, – «История понятий, история культуры, история общества», и наиболее полную на данный момент библиографию трудов В.М. Живова (Э.А. Зицер). __________________________________________________________ This volume of Вивлiоѳика is the first of several anticipated issues dedicated to the memory and intellectual influence of the late Viktor Markovich Zhivov (1945-2013). The contributors to these projected commemorative issues include former collaborators, colleagues, students, and long-time professional associates. They come from several disciplines: linguistics, literature, history, cultural studies; and they represent three or four generations of scholars and an equal number—or more!—schools of thought. What brings these disparate scholars together is a shared regard for Viktor Markovich’s enormous intellectual presence and the astonishing range and vitality of his opus (and, of course, their regard for the eighteenth century).
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Russia's Great Power Discourse
    THE EVOLUTION OF RUSSIA’S GREAT POWER DISCOURSE: A CONCEPTUAL HISTORY OF VELIKAYA DERZHAVA By Anatoly Reshetnikov Submitted to Central European University Department of International Relations Word count: 88,828 In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science Supervisor: Dr Alexander Astrov Budapest, Hungary 2018 COPYRIGHT NOTICE I hereby declare that this thesis contains no materials accepted for any other degrees in any other institutions. The thesis contains no materials previously written and/or published by another person, except where appropriate acknowledgement is made in the form of bibliographical reference. Anatoly Reshetnikov Budapest, 25 September 2018 i ABSTRACT Today, Russia is yet again talking about being a great power. Such rhetoric emerges in almost every programmatic text written by Russian politicians, as well as in every forecast and policy analysis prepared by Russian state-affiliated think-tanks. Most western observers perceive this as a question of foreign policy and treat Russia’s claims with suspicion. At a closer look, however, it becomes evident that, instead of having an exclusive connection to foreign policy, Russia’s great power discourse is self-centered, defensive, ideological, and relates equally, if not more, to the causes of Russian domestic consolidation and catch up development. In this study, I argue that the origins of this inherent ambivalence and specific functions of Russia’s great power discourse should be sought in the conceptual evolution of velikaya derzhava, a Russian political concept that is usually translated as ‘great power’. In its current shape, velikaya derzhava is a product of both the evolution of local political culture, and Russia’s discursive encounters with external political environment, the most consequential of which was Russia’s lengthy and troubled integration into the European society of states in the XVIII and the XIX centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Word and Image in Russian History
    WORD AND IMAGE IN RUSSIAN HISTORY ESSAYS IN HONOR OF GARY MARKER Photo courtesy of Media Services, Stony Brook University WORD AND IMAGE IN RUSSIAN HISTORY ESSAYS IN HONOR OF GARY MARKER EDITED BY MARIA DI SALVO, DANIEL H. KAISER, AND VALERIE A. KIVELSON Boston 2015 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data: A catalog record for this book is available from the Library of Congress. Copyright © 2015 Academic Studies Press All rights reserved ISBN 978-1-61811-458-7 (hardback) ISBN 978-1-61811-460-0 (electronic) Cover design by Ivan Grave Published by Academic Studies Press in 2015 28 Montfern Avenue Brighton, MA 02135, USA [email protected] www. academicstudiespress.com Effective December 12th, 2017, this book will be subject to a CC-BY-NC license. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. Other than as provided by these licenses, no part of this book may be reproduced, transmitted, or displayed by any electronic or mechanical means without permission from the publisher or as permitted by law. The open access publication of this volume is made possible by: This open access publication is part of a project supported by The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Humanities Open Book initiative, which includes the open access release of several Academic Studies Press volumes. To view more titles available as free ebooks and to learn more about this project, please visit borderlinesfoundation.org/open. Published by Academic Studies Press 28 Montfern Avenue Brighton, MA 02135, USA [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2005 [2005 22-02.Pdf]
    ISSN 1536-4003 University of California, Berkeley Newsletter of the Institute of Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies Summer 2005 Volume 22, Number 2 Notes from the Director In this issue: My first year as director of the Institute of Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies has been extremely stimulating and enjoyable. And Notes from the Director ................... 1 probably no event this year has been more stimulating, enjoyable, and Elena Morabito personally gratifying to me than the forum on the development of Slavic Bosnian, Serbian, and Croatian studies at UC Berkeley. Drawing on the experience, wisdom, and knowl- Electronic Corpora in Light of the edge of some of our most distinguished and admired colleagues, we Current Linguistic Situation ................ 3 presented a program of reminiscences about the life of the Slavic and East Jonathan Stone European program from the 1950s until the end of the Cold War. Our A Symbolist Palette: The Aesthetics speakers were Gregory Grossman, Joan Grossman, David Hooson, Olga of Andrei Bely’s Zoloto v lazuri .......... 7 Hughes, Hugh McLean, and Nicholas V. Riasanovsky (unfortunately, Faculty and Student News ............ 10 Robert Hughes, who had planned to participate, was out with the flu). Ivana Jelic Montenegro, Oasis in the Balkans: Following the February forum, ISEEES hosted the joint Berkeley- An Overview of Human Rights and Stanford Conference. This year, the theme was “The Caucasus: Culture, Diversity ........................................... 12 History, Politics.” The day-long event featured presentations by Stephan Outreach Programs....................... 16 Astourian (UC Berkeley), Daniel Brower (UC Davis), John Dunlop Upcoming Events .......................... 18 (Hoover Institution), Harsha Ram (UC Berkeley), Erik R.
    [Show full text]