Theatres in Presence

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Theatres in Presence BRO"'N THE University ' rgh, Old College South Bridge, Edinburgh EH8 9YL STATIONERS Tel: 031-6671011 ext4308 WE'RE BETTER 13 February-1 March EXHIBITION CLOSED FOR MAINTENANCE 20 Nicolson Street Edinburgh EHS 9DH (University Torrie Collection still on show) 031-667 8844: 668 3804 Tues-Fri 10 am-5 pm Admission Free Subsidised by the Scottish Arts Council Legal, Commercial, Edueational & Social Thursday, February 9, 1989 20p MAXWELL Student is marking National Aids THE DAVIES Awareness Week (11-18 Feb) .SHAMEN talks to by giving away 1 free condom Interview and Student, with every issue of the paper. Review page 10. Thanks to Mates Health Care for their p~ge 7. co-operation. Plus 8-page Arts supplement • Senior official claims Government loans scheme is "misconceived" 's ~· oans entitlement to social security by Katka Krosnar Education and Science's assump· tion of a I 0 per cent default means benefits, pointing out that the 'FHE Government are facing that non-repayment of loans projected £65 million savings in 1990/91 are "paltry" in compari­ their most serious setback to would be condoned. A further fault lies in the initial increase in son to the social security budget of date in their attempts to public expenditure necessitated £48 billion. introduce a student loans by the scheme. Mr Johnson's The Government's declared scheme. underlying criticism of the Gov­ aim - "to reduce the students' A senior bank official has this ernment's proposals is that "the dependency" - is, according to week attacked the Governmen(<; administration of the scheme has Mr Johnson, "misconceived, proposals. Mr Christopher not been fully worked out"_ since most students are bound to Johnson, Chief Economics The bulletin mentions defects depend on someone other than Adviser with Lloyd's Bank, pub­ which have come to light in the themselves for finance, and there lished his criticisms in the bank's· administration of loan schemes should be no disgrace in getting Economic Bulletin on Monday_ introduced elsewhere. In West modest sums from social security. He told Student that his major Germany, for instance, students Housing benefit is particularly objection to the scheme was that it have taken to working their way well targeted to cope with the had not been properly worked through college, hence taking wide variations across the country out longer to complete their degrees. in student lodging costs." Commenting on Mr Johnson's Above: Ludovic Kennedy at the debate. Photo: Hugh Pinney The bulletin states that the "T_his is exactly what the UK White Paper comes at a time when should seek to avoid, at a time proposals, a spokesperson for the GLASGOW'S Dialectics beat Edinburgh Diagnostics in the "the average gross grant has fallen · when a shortage in the supply of Department of Education and Science said: "Education Minis­ first-ever meeting of the two ancient debating societies. by 20 per cent in real terms" since graduates is developing." 1978/9. "It is time to recognise ters will look at the comments Mr The teams debated the motion "This House would block the Mr Johnson proposes an alter· that students have had a poor Channel Tunnel" and the occasion was organised in memory of native scheme whereby parental Johnson has made and_ what h_e deaL" The grants cuts have "in Michael Lockwood, the previous President of the Diagnostics who contributions would be "re- has to say and these will contn· many cases adversely affected the died tragically last year. ' placed" by commercial bank loans bute to the debate." He added, quality of their education and to parents, backed up by a "last however, that "th~ amount of t~e Lord Cameron of Loch broom, who chaired the distinguished panel their lives"_ of judges, said that he had enjoyed the speakers "most witty resort facility" allowing a number loans and the ~?stc structure wtll The White Paper's aim, Mr presentation" and that the decision as to which team deserved the of Goveni'ment loans to students not be changed - Johnson states, "appears to be to Michael Lockwood Challenge Quaich had been debated almost as who need additional finance. He . The Government is currently restore the student grant to its real fiercely as the motion. advocates an 18 per cent increase ·· involved in ne~otiati_on~ ~ith level in 1978/9". He criticises, Sources close to the panel reported that it was split evenly between in the statutory award, and the tax· ~anks and other fman~m_Imstttu- however, the manner in which the the teams and that Lord Cameron, as chair, had used his casting vote. - relief for parents on loans to cover twns on how to admtms_ter the Government have attempted to Speaking to Student later at the champagne reception, he agreed their stipulated contributions. scheme. The co-operatton of promote this aim. The top-up loans to students these organisations is vital to the that he had been very conscious of being a former President of the Access to higher education, the would cover those whose parents succes~ of the proposals, an? one ~iagnostics. He said: "There's nothing worse than having to pass bulletin points out, might be dis­ were unable or unwilling to tssues for dtscus· Judgement when your impartiality is questioned even bet·ore you ~f th~ 1mpo~tant couraged by the Government's finance them. This scheme, he SIOn ts the stze of the fee the Gov­ speak." proposed scheme of student . states would cost the taxpayer ernment are prepared to pay the George Sitwell, current President of the Diagnostics, who loans. This would be true particu· · less than the Government's prop- banks for administration. Mr organised the event, said that he hoped it would become an annual larly in the case of the economi­ osals. Johnson, however, is criticaL meeting. He said that money raised through sponsorship and cally disadvantaged. Students "Even if the Government pay donations would be used to subsidise wine at future Diagnostics' would also be encouraged to get He also criticises strongly the the banks a fee," he told Student, events and might go towards the cost of next year's debate. Full report proposed withdrawal -of students' "I still think it is a bad scheme .. , inside. into debt, and the Department of 2 Thursday, February 9, 1989 NEWS STUDENT Alternative Sermon on Careers Sex Maany people try to use sex to fill by Martin Crowther "God made us by choice sexual beings," Mrs Rankin continued. the emptiness in their lives, but "sex cannot stand the strain of giv­ However, it is only right in God's ing meaning to life," she con­ LAST Friday lunchtime Mrs eyes when carried out within mar­ cluded. There must be a spiritual Stella Rankin, Christian riage. dimension. preacher, schoolteacher and There were, she argued, six Fifthly, she identified a need for mother of four children told a steps to "maximum sex"; not getting back into a proper wide eyed Teviot audience, tially, we must recognise that sex relationship with God, and, lastly is indeed a great and a good gift. for getting into a "right" relation­ from personal experience, Secondly, we should understand how best to enjoy the delights ship with your partner. Above all, that such a relationship is vulnera­ the presence of a forgiving of "maximum sex". ble and needs protection. Thirdly, attitude in a relationship was high­ "Maximum Sex" was, she said that "harmful" sexual activities lighted as an essential component "the ability to achieve maximum such as pre-marital sex and in its long term success, without satisfaction through sex." Not, homosexuality are to be avoided. which many relationships found­ she added, "to have sex Mrs Rankin acknowledged that erect. the maximum number of times." · this is difficult due to the existence Anone wishing to do that of what she called "pleasant phys­ Stella Ran kin's address was one ical temptations." of a series given last week as part shouldn't be here, but be THI6 year's Alternative Building Society, Friends of the of the Christian Union organised Earth, the International Volun­ Next, she urged those present Careers Fair will take olace in engaged elsewhere. to "get sex into proportion." "Big Question" event. the Chaplaincy Centre, on ary Service and Tradecraft. The Wednesday 15th February. It event is to be opened by Richard Crane, author of Running the runs from midday until5 pm, and is designed as an alterna­ Himalayas and Bicycles up tive to the Careers Service's Kilimanjaro. Talks will be given Principal issues glossy by some of the organisations tak­ Milk Round. Last year it was ing part, and a "bumper package" very well attended. Amongst those taking part in of alternative careers will be the Fair this year are the Ecology suggested to all those attending. University review THE latest initiative from the tainties in higher education. widely recognised -for example Principal's office is a glossy But he warns of the difficulties in a recent review the Earth Sci­ company-report style annual ahead, as the University works to ences were described as among reduce its deficit through the plan­ the best in the country. review of the University. ned loss of around 170 staff. He is Writes Sir David: "This is the also critical of suggestions for full Elsewhere in the annual report, first annual report which I present cost tuition fees, a system which which has a completely new for­ as Principal of the University. It he says "would abandon the con­ mat this year, the University "sets appears in a changed format as cept of free higher education" and the record straight on student part of our continuing initiative to which comes at a time when there admissions", a guide to the princi­ develop the style and substance of is a demand for a higher propor­ ples and practice of under­ FOLLOWING the success ot will be on sale at desks at Potter­ our communications, both with its first club at Coasters in row (Thursday and Friday) and tion of the workforce to be edu­ graduate entry; there is a review the public at large and, particu­ cated to graduate level.
Recommended publications
  • 0 Well, That Didn't Go to Plan. General Election
    0 Well, that didn’t go to plan. General election reflections: Simon Hughes, Nick Harvey, Liz Barker, Tony Greaves and more 0 All the presidents’ answers - Mark Pack 0 How we did Unite to Remain - Peter Dunphy Issue 399 - February 2020 £ 4 Issue 399 February 2020 SUBSCRIBE! CONTENTS Liberator magazine is published six/seven times per year. Subscribe for only £25 (£30 overseas) per year. Commentary.............................................................................................3 You can subscribe or renew online using PayPal at Radical Bulletin .........................................................................................4..7 our website: www.liberator.org.uk THE HORROR SHOW SEEN FROM OUTSIDE ..................................8..9 Professional roles meant Simon Hughes had to spend the general election campaign on Or send a cheque (UK banks only), payable to the sidelines for the first time in decades. What he saw of the Lib Dems alarmed him “Liberator Publications”, together with your name and full postal address, to: EIGHT ERRORS AND COUNTING ....................................................10..11 The Liberal Democrats got a lot wrong in the 2019 general election, many of them repeated mistakes never learnt from, says Nick Harvey Liberator Publications Flat 1, 24 Alexandra Grove LED BY DONKEYS ................................................................................12..13 London N4 2LF The general election saw the Liberal Democrats fail to find messages that resonated England with voters, and the campaign
    [Show full text]
  • Saber and Scroll Journal Volume V Issue IV Fall 2016 Saber and Scroll Historical Society
    Saber and Scroll Journal Volume V Issue IV Fall 2016 Saber and Scroll Historical Society 1 © Saber and Scroll Historical Society, 2018 Logo Design: Julian Maxwell Cover Design: Cincinnatus Leaves the Plow for the Roman Dictatorship, by Juan Antonio Ribera, c. 1806. Members of the Saber and Scroll Historical Society, the volunteer staff at the Saber and Scroll Journal publishes quarterly. saberandscroll.weebly.com 2 Editor-In-Chief Michael Majerczyk Content Editors Mike Gottert, Joe Cook, Kathleen Guler, Kyle Lockwood, Michael Majerczyk, Anne Midgley, Jack Morato, Chris Schloemer and Christopher Sheline Copy Editors Michael Majerczyk, Anne Midgley Proofreaders Aida Dias, Frank Hoeflinger, Anne Midgley, Michael Majerczyk, Jack Morato, John Persinger, Chris Schloemer, Susanne Watts Webmaster Jona Lunde Academic Advisors Emily Herff, Dr. Robert Smith, Jennifer Thompson 3 Contents Letter from the Editor 5 Fleet-in-Being: Tirpitz and the Battle for the Arctic Convoys 7 Tormod B. Engvig Outside the Sandbox: Camels in Antebellum America 25 Ryan Lancaster Aethelred and Cnut: Saxon England and the Vikings 37 Matthew Hudson Praecipitia in Ruinam: The Decline of the Small Roman Farmer and the Fall of the Roman Republic 53 Jack Morato The Washington Treaty and the Third Republic: French Naval 77 Development and Rivalry with Italy, 1922-1940 Tormod B. Engvig Book Reviews 93 4 Letter from the Editor The 2016 Fall issue came together quickly. The Journal Team put out a call for papers and indeed, Saber and Scroll members responded, evidencing solid membership engagement and dedication to historical research. This issue contains two articles from Tormod Engvig. In the first article, Tormod discusses the German Battleship Tirpitz and its effect on allied convoys during WWII.
    [Show full text]
  • 62 Cole Yellow Glass Ceiling
    ThE YEllow GLAss CEiliNG THE MYSTERY of THE disAppEARING LIBERAL woMEN MPS After women became he 1950 Liberal mani- in promoting women into Par- festo boasted proudly liament and government, the eligible to stand for that ‘the part played Liberal Party managed to do election to Parliament by women in the so again only two years before in 1918, the first councils of the Liberal its own disappearance in the TParty is shown by our unani- merger of 1988. The reasons woman Liberal MP mous adoption of a programme for this striking famine are in for women drawn up by women some ways a familiar story from was elected in 1921. Yet Liberals.’1 Certainly, the two the experience of other parties; only six women ever main parties at that time gave a but there is a dimension to the lower profile to women’s status causes which is distinctively Lib- sat as Liberal MPs, and as an issue, and Liberal policy eral, and which persists today. half of them won only demanding equal pay entitled the party to regard its propos- one election, half were als as, in one reviewer’s assess- Women Liberal MPs elected at by-elections, ment, ‘more Radical than the Only six women ever sat as Lib- Labour Party’s.’2 These pro- eral MPs, and they had an unu- and all but one were posals were, as the manifesto sual profile: half of them won directly related acknowledged, in part the only one election, half were result of the efforts of an almost elected at by-elections, and all to Liberal leaders.
    [Show full text]
  • Ucin1070571375.Pdf (2.43
    UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI DATE: November 10, 2003 I, Craig T. Cobane II , hereby submit this as part of the requirements for the degree of: Doctorate of Philosophy in: Political Science It is entitled: Terrorism and Democracy The Balance Between Freedom and Order: The British Experience Approved by: Richard Harknett James Stever Thomas Moore Terrorism and Democracy The Balance Between Freedom and Order: The British Experience A dissertation submitted to the Division of Research and Advanced Studies of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTORATE OF PHILOSOPHY (Ph.D.) in the Department of Political Science of the College of Arts and Sciences 2003 by Craig T. Cobane II B.S., University of Wisconsin-Green Bay 1990 M.A., University of Cincinnati 1992 Committee Chair: Richard J. Harknett, Ph.D. Abstract The British Government has been engaged for more than thirty years in a struggle with terrorism related to Northern Ireland. During what is euphemistically called the Troubles, the British government has implemented a series of special emergency laws to address the violence. Drawing upon the political context and debate surrounding the implementation and development of the emergency legislation this research examines the overall effect of British anti-terrorism legislation on both respect for civil liberties and the government’s ability to fight campaigns of violence. Drawing heavily upon primary sources, high profile cases of miscarriages of justice and accusation of an official ‘shoot to kill’ policy this project explores three distinct areas related to a government’s balancing of the exigencies of individual liberty and societal order.
    [Show full text]
  • Battleships and British Society, 1920-1960[1]
    A Global Forum for Naval Historical Scholarship International Journal of Naval History August 2004/ December 2004 Volume 3 Numbers 2/3 Battleships and British Society, 1920-1960[1] Mark Connelly University of Kent, United Kingdom This article will explore the image of the Royal Navy’s battleships in British society between 1920 and 1960. Although much of what follows might be said to apply to Royal Navy as a whole, particularly ‘glamorous’ vessels such as aircraft carriers, cruisers and destroyers, it is the contention of this piece that the Royal Navy’s battleships by virtue of their sheer size and power captured the public imagination more than any other type of warship. The study of the image of the battleship in popular culture provides a significant insight into the atmosphere of Britain helping to reveal and highlight attitudes not just towards the Royal Navy, but also towards politics, the empire and Britain’s role in the world. Christopher M. Bell’s recent work has revealed that the Admiralty had an ambiguous attitude towards propaganda and publicity in the inter-war years. Disdainful of what it regarded as cheap appeals to the popular imagination, at the same time the Admiralty realised that it had to maintain the profile of the Navy. As foreign navies expanded abroad and the RAF tirelessly highlighted its benefits at home, the Admiralty rather reluctantly became involved in publicity activities.[2] Ralph Harrington’s has recently the great importance of HMS Hood to the British people showing that it was far more than a utilitarian and functional piece of equipment.[3] This article seeks to expand Harrington’s thesis by looking at British battleships in general, and place them within the wider framework of British society between 1920 and 1960, the year in which the last British battleship, Vanguard, was scrapped.[4] The article will examine the political and military arguments behind British naval policy in general, and the attitude towards battleships in particular.
    [Show full text]
  • The Abolition of the Death Penalty in the United Kingdom
    The Abolition of the Death Penalty in the United Kingdom How it Happened and Why it Still Matters Julian B. Knowles QC Acknowledgements This monograph was made possible by grants awarded to The Death Penalty Project from the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, the United Kingdom Foreign and Commonwealth Office, the Sigrid Rausing Trust, the Oak Foundation, the Open Society Foundation, Simons Muirhead & Burton and the United Nations Voluntary Fund for Victims of Torture. Dedication The author would like to dedicate this monograph to Scott W. Braden, in respectful recognition of his life’s work on behalf of the condemned in the United States. © 2015 Julian B. Knowles QC All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any information storage retrieval system, without permission in writing from the author. Copies of this monograph may be obtained from: The Death Penalty Project 8/9 Frith Street Soho London W1D 3JB or via our website: www.deathpenaltyproject.org ISBN: 978-0-9576785-6-9 Cover image: Anti-death penalty demonstrators in the UK in 1959. MARY EVANS PICTURE LIBRARY 2 Contents Foreword .....................................................................................................................................................4 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................5 A brief
    [Show full text]
  • Peter SANDERSON Born: 26 June 1921 Parents: Son of Henry Cecil and Dorothy Florence Sanderson of Chichester Sussex School Years: 1932-1935
    Peter SANDERSON Born: 26 June 1921 Parents: Son of Henry Cecil and Dorothy Florence Sanderson of Chichester Sussex School Years: 1932-1935 Armed Forces Record Service Rank: Able Seaman Service Number: P/JX 156 294 Service Base: HMS Hood Date of Death: 24 May 1941 Battlecruiser HMS Hood Bismarck Upon leaving Chichester High School for Boys in 1935 Old Boy Peter SANDERSON known as ‘Sandy’ entered the Royal Navy. He trained at HMS Vincent before joining the battle-cruiser HMS Hood in 1939 as an Able Seaman. He was 19 at the time of his loss. The ‘School Notes’ in the ‘Martlet’ of June 1941 described him as a “most keen athlete”. Prelude – The Battle of Denmark Straits On the 18 th May 1941 the German battleship Bismarck accompanied by the heavy cruiser Prinz Eugen sailed from the Polish port of Gdynia. The capital ships were heading for the Atlantic, the aim to cause as much damage as possible to convoys shipping supplies into Britain. The ships passed Norway and entered the Denmark Straits between Iceland and Greenland where they were detected. HMS Hood and Prince of Wales were ordered to intercept. The Sinking of HMS Hood – 24 th May 1941 Of the modern Bismarck the British writer and broadcaster Ludovic Kennedy wrote “There had never been a warship like her …… No German saw her without pride, no neutral or enemy without admiration”. In contrast the aging “Mighty Hood ’ had been built and launched during the First World War. Although sailing around the Empire in peacetime as the “embodiment of British sea power” her deck armour had been compromised for speed.
    [Show full text]
  • 48-Autumn%202005
    For the study of Liberal, SDP and Issue 48 / Autumn 2005 / £5.00 Liberal Democrat history Journal of LiberalHI ST O R Y 2005: disappointment or bridgehead? John Curtice The Liberal Democrats in the 2005 election David Dutton Holding the balance The Liberal Party and hung parliaments Stephen Tolleyfield Battling Bath Liberal Alf Wills, nineteenth-century activist Michael Wickham Berwick-upon-Tweed A venal borough? Jaime Reynolds ‘The fighting parson’ Biography of Reverend Roderick Kedward Liberal Democrat History Group council leaders, candidates, of recordings of the full and prime negotiators in the unexpurgated originals. ON RECord! Lib/Lab Pact, the formation In chronological order of the SDP and the Alliance the full list of recorded or participants in the ultimate interviews and interviewees What some Liberal Democrats really merger of the Liberals and is as follows: John Pardoe, Social Democrats. I was also John Lee, Shirley Williams, thought interested to know what they Eric Avebury (Lubbock), by Adrian Slade felt about Liberal Democrat Paul Marsden, Roy Jenkins, success to date and the party’s Mike Storey and Sir Trevor future prospects. Jones, Ludovic Kennedy, he Journal of Liberal historical perspective on the As the series continued I Bill Rodgers, David Steel, History is now the party was interesting. gained further new perspec- Barry Norman, Jim Wal- Tguardian of what is Within a year I had also tives – for example Scottish lace, Charles Kennedy, Mike already becoming a uniquely interviewed Shirley Wil- and Welsh views from Jim German, Tim Razzall, Chris interesting party archive – a liams, Eric Lubbock, Roy Wallace and Mike German; Rennard, Simon Hughes, set of audio cassette tapes of Jenkins, David Steel, Ludovic a characteristically blunt Tony Greaves, Tom McNally in-depth interviews I con- Kennedy, Mike Storey and assessment from everyone’s and Charles Kennedy ducted with many of the Sir Trevor Jones and Bill favourite guru, Tony Greaves; (again).
    [Show full text]
  • One Hundred Years of PPE 1920 – 2020
    One hundred years of PPE 1920 – 2020 2020 marks the hundredth anniversary have gone on to a very wide range of careers, of the Philosophy, Politics and Economics and the degree has been replicated at 172 (PPE) degree being established in Oxford. institutions in 33 countries. With changes to To mark the occasion, the Humanities and Oxford’s admissions process, the profile of UK Social Sciences Divisions commissioned PPE students has changed too. In the most Dr Bethany White, Dr Samuel Wainwright and recent statistics, for UK students admitted DPhil candidate Lilly Schreiter to research and between 2017 and 2019, 60.1% came write this report. It was unveiled at a virtual from state schools; 20.4% were from BME panel discussion chaired by the ex-PPE BBC backgrounds; and 10.1% came from POLAR broadcaster Evan Davis, and featuring prominent quintiles 1 and 2 (areas of low progression to PPE alumni on 12th September. The panelists, higher education). novelist Monica Ali, politician Pete Buttigieg and journalist Mary Ann Sieghart, share their During the centenary year of the degree, global memories and reflections on the degree towards leaders were forced to confront the worst the end of this report. One line from Mayor Pete pandemic since the Spanish Flu which was the stands out: “I use PPE every day.” backdrop to the degree’s first year. In 2020, Within the UK, the perception of the degree the acronym PPE became better known for the is often shaped by the surprising number ‘Personal Protective Equipment’ needed to keep of PPEists who have become government health workers safe while treating COVID-19 ministers and even Prime Minister.
    [Show full text]
  • A Handbook of Who Lived Where in Hampton Court Palace 1750 to 1950 Grace & Favour a Handbook of Who Lived Where in Hampton Court Palace 1750 to 1950
    Grace & Favour A handbook of who lived where in Hampton Court Palace 1750 to 1950 Grace & Favour A handbook of who lived where in Hampton Court Palace 1750 to 1950 Sarah E Parker Grace & Favour 1 Published by Historic Royal Palaces Hampton Court Palace Surrey KT8 9AU © Historic Royal Palaces, 2005 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. ISBN 1 873993 50 1 Edited by Clare Murphy Copyedited by Anne Marriott Printed by City Digital Limited Front cover image © The National Library, Vienna Historic Royal Palaces is a registered charity (no. 1068852). www.hrp.org.uk 2 Grace & Favour Contents Acknowledgements 4 Preface 5 Abbreviations 7 Location of apartments 9 Introduction 14 A list of who lived where in Hampton Court Palace, 1750–1950 16 Appendix I: Possible residents whose apartments are unidentified 159 Appendix II: Senior office-holders employed at Hampton Court 163 Further reading 168 Index 170 Grace & Favour 3 Acknowledgements During the course of my research the trail was varied but never dull. I travelled across the country meeting many different people, none of whom had ever met me before, yet who invariably fetched me from the local station, drove me many miles, welcomed me into their homes and were extremely hospitable. I have encountered many people who generously gave up their valuable time and allowed, indeed, encouraged me to ask endless grace-and-favour-related questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Ten Rillington Place and the Changing Politics of Abortion in Modern Britain*
    The Historical Journal, , (), pp. – © Cambridge University Press This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/./), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. doi:./SX TEN RILLINGTON PLACE AND THE CHANGING POLITICS OF ABORTION IN MODERN BRITAIN* E M M A L. J O N E S AND NEIL PEMBERTON University of Manchester ABSTRACT. This article addresses the social, cultural, and political history of backstreet abortion in post-war Britain, focusing on the murders of Beryl Evans and her daughter Geraldine, at Ten Rillington Place in . It shows how the commonplace connection of John Christie to abortion and Beryl Evan’s death was not a given in the wider public, legal, political, and forensic imagination of the time, reflecting the multi-layered and shifting meanings of abortion from the date of the original trials in the late s and s, through the subsequent judicial and literary reinvestigations of the case in the s, to its cinematic interpretation in the s. Exploring the language of abortion used in these different contexts, the article reveals changes in the gendering of abortionists, the increasing power and presence of abortion activists and other social reformers, the changing representation of working-class women and men, and the increasing critique of the practice of backstreet abortion. The case is also made for a kind of societal blind spot on abortion at the time of both the Evans and Christie trials; in particular, a reluctance to come to terms with the concept of the male abortionist, which distorted the criminal investigations and the trials themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Paper
    Working Paper ‘Where’s the money coming from?’ Tracing the history of manifesto costings in UK elections, 1955-2019 Peter Sloman Image Credit: The Conservative Party Archive/Contributor ‘Labour’s Tax Bombshell’ 1992 https://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/news-photo/poster-for-the-british-conservative-party-from-the- 1992-news-photo/91270677 1 ‘Where’s the money coming from?’ Tracing the history of manifesto costings in UK elections, 1955-2019 Peter Sloman CONTENTS Introduction 3 Inventing the ‘tax bombshell’, 1953-1959 4 The politics of tax and spend, 1959-1974 7 The ‘new realism’ and the tax revolt, 1974-1997 11 Fiscal rules and ‘deficit deniers’: Debating the fiscal baseline, 1997-2019 16 Conclusions 19 Appendix: List of manifesto costings 21 Author’s Note This is a working paper, published to provide historical context for the 2019 general election campaign. The author would welcome comments and suggestions for improvement: please email Peter Sloman at [email protected] Acknowledgements I am grateful to Dr Aled Davies of Jesus College, Oxford, for insightful discussions on this topic. Our co-authored chapter, ‘Fiscal promises: Tax and spending in British general elections since 1964’, is forthcoming in David Thackeray and Richard Toye (eds.), Electoral Pledges in Britain since 1918: The Politics of Promises (Palgrave Macmillan, 2020). Published November 2019 Publication from the Bennett Institute for Public Policy, Cambridge www.bennettinstitute.cam.ac.uk Introduction Tuesday 5 November – the day before the 2019 general election campaign officially kicked off – was pencilled in on the Conservative grid as tax bombshell day. According to the Financial Times, Sajid Javid briefed the Cabinet that Treasury officials had spent two weeks analysing Labour’s spending plans, and their work would show that Jeremy Corbyn’s policies would cost ‘hundreds of billions of pounds’.
    [Show full text]