DOCSLIB.ORG

SUBMISSION Climate Change Policy Proposals

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SUBMISSION Climate Change Policy Proposals SUBMISSION Climate Change Policy Proposals This submission by Oxfam New Zealand has been prepared in response to the five government position papers on climate change: • Measures to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions in New Zealand Post-2012 (Ministry for the Environment) • Transitional Measures to Reduce New Zealand Greenhouse Gas Emissions Prior to 2012 (Ministry of Economic Development) • Draft New Zealand Energy Strategy to 2050 (Ministry of Economic Development) • Draft New Zealand Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy (Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority) • Sustainable Land Management and Climate Change (Ministry of Agriculture & Forestry) Contact Oxfam New Zealand Attn: Barry Coates, Executive Director 62 Aitken Terrace, Kingsland Auckland 1145 Tel: (9) 355-6500 www.oxfam.org.nz Oxfam New Zealand Submission: Climate Change (30 March 2007) 1 I. Recommendations Oxfam New Zealand is a non-profit development organisation with programme activities concentrated in the Pacific and East Asia. We are principally concerned with assisting poor and vulnerable people in developing countries to mitigate and adapt to climate change (see Conclusion). We welcome this opportunity to comment on the set of five climate change policy proposals released for public consultation in December 2006. This submission is our first in-depth policy statement on climate change. Oxfam New Zealand is working closely with the other affiliates of Oxfam International, who have collectively identified climate change as one of the strategic priorities for the forthcoming five years. In New Zealand, Oxfam joined the Climate Defence Network (www.climatedefence.org.nz) in August 2006 and is seeking to build links with other organizations and scientific institutes. Oxfam New Zealand welcomes this initiative to develop coherent climate change policy, but is concerned that the five policy documents do not establish an overarching framework for how to address the significant and pressing challenges posed by climate change. The policies lack bold, achievable and measurable targets for action with staged milestones. There are also major omissions with respect to our international obligations under Kyoto and our ethical commitment to assist developing countries to adapt and mitigate against climate change. Oxfam New Zealand believes the government should: • Establish an overarching framework for climate change policy with bold, achievable and measurable targets for action including staged milestones; • Institute a carbon pricing system without delay. • Preserve and expand existing sinks, both land and sea, and engage in off-setting; • Initiate a range of measures to reduce emissions and to reduce demand for private road transport and non-renewable energy; • Address aviation emissions and demonstrate that goods produced domestically for export meet the highest environmental standards possible; • Push for strong, universal emissions reduction targets in international negotiations; • Commit funding, additional to the existing aid budget, and political support to a far larger global Adaptation Fund; • Mainstream climate change assessments into New Zealand’s development assistance programmes and advocate for international financial institutions and others to also undertake climate change mainstreaming; • Ensure that ethical dimensions of climate change, including both international and inter-generational equity, underlie New Zealand’s climate change policy framework. Oxfam New Zealand Submission: Climate Change (30 March 2007) 2 II. Policy Comments 1. Oxfam New Zealand is concerned that New Zealand still does not have a set of policies to address climate change despite being a member of the 1997 Kyoto Protocol with a firm target to reduce our carbon emissions to what they were in 1990. Disappointingly little of the government’s 2002 policy package on climate change has been implemented. In 1999, New Zealand’s carbon emissions were caused primarily by the agriculture (49%) and energy (42%) sectors. The transport sector is however the fastest growing source of emissions. 2. Strong political leadership on climate change is needed if we are to achieve a truly sustainable economy. We welcome Prime Minister Helen Clark’s recent calls for New Zealand to aspire to be carbon neutral and the initiative to move the public service towards carbon neutrality. Such statements should not, however, obscure the fundamental need to set and meet emissions reductions targets. 3. New Zealand’s climate change policy requires bold, achievable and measurable objectives and targets. We need absolute and measurable targets to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, to increase energy efficiency, to shift transport modes, and for conversion to renewable energy. For instance, the overall transport goal proposes a resilient, low carbon transport system yet neither ‘resilient’ nor ‘low carbon’ is defined and the measures proposed are inadequate to meet this goal. 4. New Zealand urgently needs a robust cap on its greenhouse gas emissions including a comprehensive pricing system that ultimately covers all sectors. We must put a price on carbon. 5. The allocation of emissions permits must be carefully considered. Mechanisms for permit distribution are key considerations in developing an equitable system. We are concerned that “grand-parenting” could provide substantial windfall gains to polluters. Permits should not be issued in perpetuity. Much could be learned from New Zealand’s experience implementing the fisheries quota system. 6. Other options not covered by the policy proposals include auctions and a tradable permits scheme based upon individually allocated emissions entitlements. Both have their merits and should be considered. Permit auctioning gives the revenue to government, which can then be smartly recycled to achieve further emissions reductions and ensure equitable outcomes. 7. Priority should be given to preserving and expanding existing carbon sinks. The retention of existing sinks in marine areas, fisheries, wetlands, and soil are absent from the policy proposals. Greater emphasis should be placed on improving carbon storage in existing indigenous forests. 8. Measures to offset our carbon emissions are important and necessary, but second in priority to establishing a cap. Offsetting alters the short-term carbon cycle and could be used as a justification for continuing to add long-term carbon into this cycle. In planting new forests, for example, the policy proposals must consider the biodiversity implications and ecological impacts of offsetting with radiata pine or other non-natives. Oxfam New Zealand Submission: Climate Change (30 March 2007) 3 9. Throughout the policy proposals too much focus is placed on the kind of power generation or transport needed (supply side) as opposed to reducing emissions and significantly reducing demand for motorized transport and for new energy generation. For example, by emphasizing fuel efficiencies and biofuels, the proposed transportation policy does little to encourage alternatives to private road transport and doesn't address the imperative to reduce the need for individualised motorised travel. A broader overview of the importance of sound urban planning is missing. There is a need for greater public education campaigns to create informed consumers. 10. The rapidly emerging demand for biofuels represents a significant opportunity for many developing countries, yet there are many drawbacks. Indonesia and Malaysia are experiencing severe deforestation brought about in part by the creation of massive oil palm plantations that has resulted in massive loss of biodiversity and numerous cases of abuse of customary land rights, displacement and violent conflict. In Brazil, soy production has displaced smallholder farmers and indigenous peoples and is currently held to be responsible for more destruction of the Amazon than either logging or ranching. New Zealand should carefully consider these and other issues in the importation and use of biofuels. A holistic understanding of the biodiversity and other impacts is essential in the development of a domestic biofuel industry. 11. The transportation section of the policy proposals includes some useful principles, but carbon emissions from aviation are conspicuously absent. While these are not included in the Kyoto Protocol, aviation emissions are significant and should be considered not least because their growth has the potential to swamp carbon reductions in other areas. 12. New Zealand cannot afford to sidetrack aviation issues. Our economy is heavily dependent upon sending produce long distance as well as revenue from international tourism. Internationally, major buyers of NZ products are beginning to initiate full carbon accounting on both distance travel and the production system. The calculation of these food miles could potentially discriminate unfairly against long distance trade. As a leader in global trade talks our actions will be closely watched. Our actions and stance on aviation emissions could assist developing countries facing similar constraints on their exports. As a proponent of free trade, we have a responsibility to develop climate- friendly trade for a world of carbon conscious consumers. 13. We must consider our own carbon footprint as well as our greenhouse gas footprint from aviation and other emissions. For example, New Zealand dairy products may have a low carbon footprint if shipped by sea and not air, but our greenhouse gas emissions could be high if methane is factored
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ending Violence Against Women: an Oxfam Guide
    ENDING VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN An oxfam Guide Ending Violence Against Women | OXFAM i ii OXFAM | Ending Violence Against Women Contents Why do we work on Violence against women? ……………………………………………………………… 3 What is Violence against women? …………………………………………………………………………………… 4 Key Concepts: …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 4 What Are the Causes of Violence against women? ……………………………………………… 5 What Does oxfam Do to End Violence against women? ………………………………………………… 7 A Priority Theme for Oxfam ……………………………………………………………………………………… 7 A Rights-Based, Transformative Approach …………………………………………………………… 8 What does “rights-based and transformative” mean in practice? ……………………… 9 Transforming Attitudes and Social norms ………………………………………………………………11 tracking Change ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 14 Theories of Change ……………………………………………………………………………………………………14 Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning (MEL): ……………………………………………………………18 Examples from Oxfam programs: ………………………………………………………………………………19 What Can I Do to End Violence against women? ………………………………………………………… 20 Oxfam Programs …………………………………………………………………………………………………………20 Inside Oxfam ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………21 Suggestions for Monitoring …………………………………………………………………………………………… 25 Implementation of the Oxfam Guide on Ending Violence against women ……………25 Questions and Indicators …………………………………………………………………………………………25 Processes for Monitoring and Experience-Sharing ………………………………………………26 Annexes …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 27 Resources …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………27
    [Show full text]
  • Oxfam COUNTRY Strategy Kenya 2015-2020
    Oxfam COUNTRY strategy kenya 2015-2020 INFLUENCING societies Peter a fisherman and trader, fishing in Lake Turkana Photo: Brian Inganga/Oxfam Front cover photo: The women of Nawoyatir village sing and dance in celebration of the arrival of clean water. Photo: Kieran Doherty /Oxfam Vision A transformed Kenyan Society that challenges poverty and inequality to claim their rights Oxfam’s vision is a just world without poverty: a world in which people can influence decisions that affect their lives, enjoy their rights and assume their responsibilities as full citizens of a world in which all human beings are valued and treated equally. context Growth and inequality Kenya has emerged third in the top 20 fastest growing economies in the world in 2015, with an expected growth of 6% (Bloomberg Business, 2015). In 2012, Kenya achieved lower middle income status and was ranked the ninth largest African country with a Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of $55.2 billion (World Bank, 2014). Despite this positive trend on economic growth, Kenya is one the most unequal countries in the world, with a Gini coefficient of 0.445 (SID,2013). The country’s top 10% households control 42% of total income while the bottom 10% controls less than 1% (SID, 2013). 42% of its 44.4 million people live below the poverty line with wide disparities in the dis- tribution of poverty across the 47 Counties. Kajiado, the least poor County, has a poverty rate of 11% and a poverty gap of 2.5%, com- pared to Turkana, with 94.3% poverty rate and a poverty gap of 67.5%, respectively (CRA Ken- ya County Factsheets, 2011 and 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Working Together to End Poverty and Injustice
    Working together to end poverty and injustice Like slavery and apartheid, poverty is “not natural. It is man-made and it can be overcome. Nelson Mandela at an event organized by Oxfam in London, 2005” Join us. We are Oxfam America. Forty percent of the people on our planet—more than 2.5 billion—live in poverty, struggling to survive on less than $2 a day. Oxfam America is working to change that. In a world rich in resources, we believe poverty can be overcome. Who we are How we work Oxfam America is an international relief and To achieve lasting solutions to poverty, Oxfam development organization that creates lasting relies on the knowledge and insight of those solutions to poverty, hunger, and injustice. affected; we work with local people so they can Founded in 1970, we are part of Oxfam address the causes of poverty themselves. International, a confederation of 13 Oxfams We provide practical assistance to help them working in more than 120 countries, including the become self-sufficient, respond to humanitarian US. Together with individuals and local groups emergencies, and stand up for their rights. in these countries, we save lives, help people We combine this grassroots work with research, overcome poverty, and fight for social justice. education, and global advocacy to change unjust laws and practices that keep people trapped in poverty. Working together to end poverty and injustice oxfam | saving lives Inevitably, disasters strike poor people REBUILDING COMMUNITIES hardest. When a hurricane hits or a violent After the short-term crisis, we tackle the more complex conflict erupts, these are the people least work of helping communities rebuild and come prepared to withstand the trauma, with back stronger.
    [Show full text]
  • CHANGE Initiative
    Oxfam at a glance: CHANGE Initiative The CHANGE Initiative is a highly competitive national program that trains college students to become actively engaged with Oxfam America’s work. Its goals: to broaden perspectives, inspire action, and shape a new generation of global citizens. THE POWER OF YOUTH Selecting the best • After the training, CHANGE Leaders return to their campuses energized and Youth is a time of transformation, op- • Students must be entering their sopho- ready to work on social justice. Oxfam timism, and energy—and college and more or junior year at a US-based staff work with them throughout the university campuses create an environ- college or university to be eligible for the year, providing ongoing guidance and ment where young people can learn about, CHANGE Initiative. Interested students keeping in touch through a shared and act on, the issues that are important go through a competitive application and online community. to them. Since 1974, Oxfam’s Fast for a selection process. World Harvest campaign has attracted • From among these applicants, Oxfam Campaigns on campus tens of thousands of students to the cause selects 50 students annually who best of fighting hunger and poverty. Inspired • Each CHANGE Leader implements at demonstrate strong ideals and a commit- by this success, Oxfam developed the least one Oxfam-specific public advocacy ment to positive change. These students, CHANGE Initiative in 2000 to harness the campaign on campus. Recent campaigns known as CHANGE Leaders, come from power of young people toward promoting include promoting fair trade; creating diverse backgrounds, as well as a mix of global citizenship.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Reforming the International Financial and Fiscal System for Better COVID
    ‘Reforming the International Financial and Fiscal System for better COVID-19 and Post-Pandemic Crisis Responsiveness’, Chapter 2 in Papyrakis, E. (ed., (Forthcoming), COVID19 and International Development, Palgrave (to be published in August 2021) Rolph van der Hoeven a,c and Rob Vos b,c a UN Committee for Development Policy, New York, USA b Markets, Trade and Institutions Division (MTID), International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), WashinGton D.C., USA c International Institute of Social Studies (ISS), Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Hague, the Netherlands Abstract The Global economic crisis provoked by the COVID-19 pandemic disproportionally hurt developing countries, increasing poverty, food insecurity, and income inequality. Richer nations cushioned their economies from the worst impacts with unprecedented massive fiscal and financial support proGrammes. DevelopinG countries lacked such capacity and received feeble multilateral continGency financinG, symptomizinG the fundamental flaws in the international financial and fiscal system (IFFS). Four reforms will make the IFFS better suited to serve sustainable development: (a) an eQuitable international tax coordination mechanism; (b) a multilaterally backed sovereign debt workout mechanism; (c) overhaulinG policy conditionality associated with development finance; and (d) increasinG Special DrawinG Rights to be leveraGed for development finance. 1. Introduction The global economic crisis provoked by the COVID-19 pandemic once more has painfully revealed fundamental flaws in
    [Show full text]
  • Pressing for Peace the Blockade of Gaza Must Be Completely Lifted
    Pressing for Peace Progress towards peace will require an inclusive process engaging all political actors and relevant stakeholders, including civil society, refugees, and women, in efforts to resolve the final status issues that have been at the heart of the conflict for decades. This is vital to secure a just and durable resolution to the conflict, in accordance with international law. All Palestinian factions need to intensify their dialogue to pave the way for a reunified Palestinian government able to effectively provide for the needs of its civilian population. Oxfam advocates for Palestinian and Israeli leaders, the leaders of all neighbouring states and the international community, to make every effort to meet their obligations and commitments under previous agreements. Oxfam believes that all people in the Middle East region should be free from violence, coercion, and deprivation. Ensuring the basic rights for ordinary women, men, and children is fundamental to the success of any peace process. Oxfam is against the use of violence against civilians in any form and calls on all parties to protect civilians from harm. Israel has legitimate security concerns that can be addressed without compromising the rights of Palestinians under occupation. Israel, the Palestinian authorities and armed groups, have a responsibility to uphold international humanitarian and human rights law to protect civilians. Israel has the right and duty to defend itself against indiscriminate rocket attacks against its civilian population. The current policy of blockade fails to provide Israel with increased security. Indeed, security of Israelis and Palestinians is indivisible: one depends on the other. For Palestinians in Gaza, most aspects of their lives are characterised by insecurity of all kinds: military presence and attacks, loss of life and extra-judicial assassinations, loss of land, restrictions on movement, lack of drinking water, unemployment, and barriers to healthcare and education.
    [Show full text]
  • The Inequality Virus Bringing Together a World Torn Apart by Coronavirus Through a Fair, Just and Sustainable Economy
    Adam Dicko is a Malian activist, fighting for social justice in the times of COVID-19 © Xavier Thera/Oxfam The Inequality Virus Bringing together a world torn apart by coronavirus through a fair, just and sustainable economy www.oxfam.org OXFAM BRIEFING PAPER – JANUARY 2021 The coronavirus pandemic has the potential to lead to an increase in inequality in almost every country at once, the first time this has happened since records began. The virus has exposed, fed off and increased existing inequalities of wealth, gender and race. Over two million people have died, and hundreds of millions of people are being forced into poverty while many of the richest – individuals and corporations – are thriving. Billionaire fortunes returned to their pre-pandemic highs in just nine months, while recovery for the world’s poorest people could take over a decade. The crisis has exposed our collective frailty and the inability of our deeply unequal economy to work for all. Yet it has also shown us the vital importance of government action to protect our health and livelihoods. Transformative policies that seemed unthinkable before the crisis have suddenly been shown to be possible. There can be no return to where we were before. Instead, citizens and governments must act on the urgency to create a more equal and sustainable world. 2 © Oxfam International January 2021 This paper was written by Esmé Berkhout, Nick Galasso, Max Lawson, Pablo Andrés Rivero Morales, Anjela Taneja, and Diego Alejo Vázquez Pimentel. Oxfam acknowledges the assistance of Jaime
    [Show full text]
  • How Supermarkets Became Pandemic Winners While Women Workers Are Losing Out
    NOT IN THIS TOGETHER HOW SUPERMARKETS BECAME PANDEMIC WINNERS WHILE WOMEN WORKERS ARE LOSING OUT .........................REPORT OXFAM BRIEFING NOTE – JUNE 2021 This Oxfam briefing note presents compelling new evidence that supermarket shareholders and owners are some of the biggest winners in the COVID-19 pandemic. Booming business has allowed them to prioritize shareholder payouts while workers at the bottom of their supply chains particularly women – earn a pittance, with their rights violated. Women’s exploitation in supermarket supply chains is pervasive and systemic, and too often women are left carrying the financial burden of the pandemic. Supermarkets and governments are at a crossroads and must act. They must choose whether to build a better global retail model that focuses on the interests of women, workers and their communities – or carry on turning a blind eye to escalating inequality. © Oxfam International June 2021. This paper was written by Anouk Franck and Art Prapha. Oxfam acknowledges the assistance of many individuals and organizations in its production: Jacques-Chai Chomthongdi, Rachel Colbourne, Christina Corbett, Rukia Cornelius, Lies Craeynest, Ranjana Das, Gustavo Ferroni, Uwe Gneiting, Asim Saqlain, Irit Tamir, Rapatsa Trirath, Charlotte Vollaard, and Rachel Wilshaw. The paper is part of a series written to inform public debate on development and humanitarian policy issues. This paper aims to stimulate debate about improvements in working conditions and respect for human rights in supermarket supply chains. It does not constitute an offense nor is it intended to defame producers of Brazilian coffee, Pakistani rice, South African wine, seafood from Thailand or Assam tea from India. We shared the draft texts that mentioned company information with the respective supermarkets for comments.
    [Show full text]
  • OXFAM POVERTY REPORT Kevin Watkins
    OXFAM POVERTY REPORT Kevin Watkins Oxfam UK & Ireland The Oxfam Poverty Report © Oxfam (UK and Ireland) 1995 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN 0 85598 318 3 All rights reserved. Reproduction, copy, transmission or translation of any part of this publication may only be made under the following conditions: • with the prior written permission of the publisher • with a licence from the Copyright Licensing Agency Limited, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1P9HE.UK • for quotation in a review of the work • under the terms set out below. This publication is copyright, but may be reproduced by any method without fee for teaching purposes but not for resale. Because Oxfam wants to know how widely its materials are disseminated, formal permission is required for all such uses, but will be granted immediately. For copying in any other circumstances or for re-use in other publications, or for translation or adaptation, prior written permission must be obtained from the publisher, and a fee may be payable. Available in Ireland from Oxfam in Ireland, 19 Clanwilliam Terrace, Dublin 2. Tel: 01 661 8544. Published by Oxfam (UK and Ireland), 274 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 7DZ, UK. in association with Oxfam America, Oxfam Canada, and Oxfam New Zealand (for contact addresses, see p.250). Designed by Oxfam Design Department OX1834/PK/95 Printed by Oxfam Print Unit Oxfam is a registered charity no. 202918. This book converted to digital file in 2010 Introduction Acknowledgements v Introduction 1 1 Poverty 12 2 A world
    [Show full text]
  • Time to Care Unpaid and Underpaid Care Work and the Global Inequality Crisis
    Time to care Unpaid and underpaid care work and the global inequality crisis Embargoed until January 20, 2020, 00:01 GMT www.oxfam.org OXFAM BRIEFING PAPER – JANUARY 2020 Economic inequality is out of control. In 2019, the world’s billionaires, only 2,153 people, had more wealth than 4.6 billion people. This great divide is based on a flawed and sexist economic system that values the wealth of the privileged few, mostly men, more than the billions of hours of the most essential work – the unpaid and underpaid care work done primarily by women and girls around the world. Tending to others, cooking, cleaning and fetching water and firewood are essential daily tasks for the wellbeing of societies, communities and the functioning of the economy. The heavy and unequal responsibility of care work perpetuates gender and economic inequalities. This has to change. Governments around the world must act now to build a human economy that is feminist and values what truly matters to society, rather than fuelling an endless pursuit of profit and wealth. Investing in national care systems to address the disproportionate responsibility for care work done by women and girls and introducing progressive taxation, including taxing wealth and legislating in favour of carers, are possible and crucial first steps. 2 © Oxfam International January 2020 This paper was written by Max Lawson, Anam Parvez Butt, Rowan Harvey, Diana Sarosi, Clare Coffey, Kim Piaget and Julie Thekkudan. The authors are grateful to a range of experts who generously gave their assistance: the Women's Budget Group, Corina Rodriguez and Florencia Partenio of Development Alternatives with Women for a New Era (DAWN) global network, Salimah Valiani, FEMNET, Danny Dorling, Christoph Lakner, Jonathan Ostry and Branko Milanovic.
    [Show full text]
  • Data-Driven Economies: Foundations for Our Common Future
    Data-driven Economies: Foundations for Our Common Future WHITE PAPER APRIL 2021 Cover: Thulfiqar Ali, Unsplash –Inside: Getty Images, Unsplash Contents 3 Foreword 4 Executive summary 5 1 Introduction: Challenge and opportunity 13 2 Evolving perspectives on data use 18 3 Harnessing advances in technology 23 4 Laying the groundwork: Key enablers 25 4.1 Inspiring citizen participation and trust in data sharing 27 4.1.1 Inclusion and equitable benefit 28 4.1.2 Security 29 4.2 Designing systems that scale and support growth 29 4.2.1 Global interoperability across jurisdictions 29 4.2.2 Scalability 30 4.2.3 Competition 30 4.2.4 Governance and oversight 31 5 Looking ahead 33 Contributors 35 Endnotes © 2021 World Economic Forum. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying and recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system. Data-driven Economies: Foundations for Our Common Future 2 Foreword Creating a better future together Kimberly Bella Project Fellow, Data for Jane Allen Common Purpose Initiative, Principal, PwC, USA Data Policy Platform, World Economic Forum LLC; Seconded from Visa Nadia Hewett Cathy Mulligan Project Lead, Data for Visiting Researcher, Common Purpose Initiative, Imperial College London, Data Policy and Blockchain, United Kingdom World Economic Forum LLC The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the the work undertaken at the Centre for the Fourth inadequacies of the world’s collective approach to Industrial Revolution over the past two years. This data. The inability, and sometimes unwillingness, global multistakeholder project community of over to share and use data to combat COVID-19 or to 45 organizations in 20 countries is focused on: protect against predatory uses of data has negatively impacted individuals, private enterprise, citizens, – Surfacing opportunities for unlocking data for research institutions and governments around the common purposes globe.
    [Show full text]
  • Poverty Footprint Indicators Guidance
    Poverty Footprint Indicators Guidance This companion guidance to the Poverty Footprint Implementation Guide is a resource for Poverty Footprint project partners. It provides a list of suggested indicators for a Poverty Footprint assessment as related to the Poverty Footprint’s “5 by 5 Framework.” It is important to note that this guide is for reference purposes only. It suggests indicators that project partners may consider, but it is not a complete or exhaustive list. As highlighted in the Poverty Footprint Guide, the project partners will determine the specific indicators to be used in a Poverty Footprint study, tailored to the company’s business model, industry standards, country/regional context, among other criteria (Please see the “Implementation Section” of the Poverty Footprint Guide for more information on how to identify indicators). Overview of the Poverty Footprint Framework The Poverty Footprint is based on a framework that links five poverty dimensions to five areas of corporate practice and decision-making. For shorthand this is referred to as the “5 by 5 Framework.” The five Poverty Dimensions include: I. Livelihoods. This refers to the ability of people living in poverty to meet essential needs for themselves and their family, i.e., adequate food, housing, clothing, and healthcare, in the context of supporting and protecting their rights. Beyond earnings, it refers to the opportunity for individuals to pursue options for personal development, upward mobility, career development, and security. Key categories include (focusing on men and women workers, smallholders, micro, small, and medium enterprises along the value chain): 1. Earnings, Wages and Benefits 2. Security of Income 3.
    [Show full text]