DOCSLIB.ORG

Camera Depautaţilor

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Camera Depautaţilor Camera Deputaţilor: Alba - Radu Eugeniu Coclici (PSD+PC), Călin Potor, Clement Negruţ, Corneliu Olar (PDL), Teodor Atanasiu (PNL); Arad - Ciprian Florin Luca (PSD+PC), Lucian Riviş Tipei, Claudia Boghicevici, Adrian Henorel Niţu, Marius Sorin Gondor, Iustin – Marinel Cionca - Arghir (PDL), Mihăiţă Calimente (PNL), Petru Farago (UDMR); Argeş - Mircea Drăghici - Gheorghe, Ion Burnei, Filip Georgescu, Radu Constantin Vasilică, Bogdan Niculescu - Duvăz (PSD+PC), Sorin Gheorghe Buta, Sorin Andi Pandele, Cristian Alexandru Boureanu (PDL), Andrei- Dominic Gerea - Argeş (PNL), (UDMR); Bacău - Gheorghe Antohi, Iulian Iancu, Viorel Hrebenciuc, Petru -Gabriel Vlase (PSD+PC), Adrian Popescu, Valerian Vreme, Vasile Gherasim (PDL), Tudor Alexandru Chiuariu, Ionel Palăr, Mihai Banu (PNL), (UDMR); Bihor - Ioan - Sorin Roman, Sonia – Maria Drăghici (PSD+PC), Ştefan Seremi, Octavian Bot (PDL), Lucia - Ana Varga, Nicolae Jolţa (PNL), Akos Derzsi, Petru Lakatos, Csilla- Maria Peto (UDMR); Bistriţa Năsăud - Emil Radu Moldovan (PSD+PC), Ioan Nelu Botiş, Ioan Oltean (PDL), Ioan Ţintean (PNL), (UDMR); Botoşani - Andrei Dolineaschi, Costică Macaleţi (PSD+PC), Stelică Iacob - Strugaru, Cătălin - Ovidiu Buhăianu - Obuf (PDL), Neculai Rebenciuc, Florin Ţurcanu (PNL), (UDMR); Braşov - Constantin Niţă, Mihai Donţu, Nicolescu Gabriel Tiţa (PSD+PC), Gabriel Andronache, Florin Postolachi, Gheorghe Ialomiţianu (PDL), Gheorghe Gabor, Mihai Aurel Donţu (PNL), Anna-Lili Farkas (UDMR); Brăila - Viorel Balcan, Mihai Tudose, Cristian Rizea (PSD+PC), Eugen Bădălan (PDL), Adriana Diana Tuşa (PNL), (UDMR); Buzău - Adrian Mocanu, Marian Ghiveciu, Carmen Ileana Moldovan (PSD+PC), Valeriu Alecu, Cezar-Florin Preda (PD-L), Adrian-George Scutaru, Titi Holban (PNL); Caraş-Severin - Ioan-Narcis Chisăliţă, Ion Mocioalcă (PSD+PC), Gheorghe Hogea, Valentin Rusu (PDL), Ion Tabugan (PNL), (UDMR); Călăraşi - Ioan Damian, Dumitru Boabeş (PSD+PC), Stelian Fuia (PD-L), Gheorghe Eugen Nicolăescu, Dan Ştefan Motreanu (PNL), (UDMR); Cluj - Cornel Itu, Vasile Filip Soporan (PSD+PC), Mircia Giugiu, Daniel Buda, Petru Călian, Adrian Gurzău (PD-L), Horea-Dorin Uioreanu, Virgil Pop (PNL), Mozes-Zoltan Palfi, Andras-Levente Mate (UDMR); Constanţa - Ileana-Cristina Dumitrache, Eduard Stelian Martin, Matei Radu Brătianu, Manuela Mitrea, Antonella Marinescu (PSD+PC), Constantin Chirilă, Zanfir Iorguş, Maria Stavrositu (PDL), Gheorghe Dragomir, Mihai Lupu (PNL); Covasna - Horia Grama (PSD+PC), Andras Ghyorghy Edler, Arpad-Francisc Marton, Gergely Olosz (UDMR); Dâmboviţa - Gheorghe Ana, Ion Stan, Ion Dumitru (PSD+PC), Gheorghe Albu , Georgică Dumitru, Bogdan Cantaragiu, Iulian Vladu (PD-L), Gabriel Plăiaşu (PNL), (UDMR); Dolj - Florentin Gust-Băloşin, Petre Petrescu, Iulian Claudiu Manda, Valeriu Ştefan Zgonea, Ion Călin (PSD+PC), Mihai Surpăţeanu, Constantin Dascălu, Gelu Vişan (PDL), Ionuţ Marian Stroe, Mihai Alexandru Voicu (PNL). Galaţi - Viorel Ştefan, Dan Nica, Florin Costin Pâslaru, Lucreţia Roşca, Liviu-Bogdan Ciucă (PSD+PC), Mircea-Nicu Toader, Carmen Axenie, Mihail Boldea (PDL), Victor Paul Dobre (PNL), (UDMR); Giurgiu - Mădălin Ştefan Voicu (PSD+PC), Victor Boiangiu (PDL), Dan Păsat, Daniel Chiţoiu (PNL), (UDMR); Gorj - Mugurel Surupăceanu, Vasile Popeangă, Victor Ponta (PSD+PC), Mihai Popescu, Constantin Militaru (PDL), Dan Ilie Morega - Gorj (PNL), (UDMR); Harghita - Mircea Duşa (PSD+PC), Attila Korody, Hunor Kelemen, Istvan Antal, Arpad Pal (UDMR); Hunedoara - Laurenţiu Nistor, Cornel Resmeriţă (PSD+PC), Iosif Blaga, Monica Iacob Ridzi, Viorel Arion (PDL), Ioan Timiş, Radu Ţîmpău (PNL); Ialomiţa - Marian Neacşu, Dan Mircea Popescu (PSD+PC), Tinel Gheorghe (PDL), Cristina Pocora (PNL); Iaşi - Luminiţa Iordache, Vasile Mocanu, Neculai Răţoi, Anghel Stanciu, Tudor Ciuhodaru (PSD+PC), Petru Movilă, Vasile Oajdea, Teodor Spînu, Nicuşor Păduraru (PDL), Relu Fenechiu, Cristian Adomniţei, Cristina Dobre (PNL), (UDMR); Ilfov - Gabriel Oprea (PSD+PC), Mircea Marin, Mihaela Şandru (PDL), Călin Popescu Tăriceanu (PNL); Maramureş - Gheorghe Zoicaş, Cătălin Cherecheş (PSD+PC), Nicolae Bud, Doru Leşe (PDL), Pavel Horj, Vasile Berci (PNL), Ştefan Beres (UDMR); Mehedinţi - Eugen Nicolicea (PSD+PC), Cornel Ghiţă, Doiniţa Mariana Chircu (PDL), Viorel Palaşcă (PNL); Mureş - Victor Socaciu (PSD+PC), Mihai Doru Oprişcan, Toader Stroian (PDL), Ciprian Minodor Dobre (PNL), Laszlo Borbely, Atila Bela Ladislau Kelemen, Karoly Kerekes (UDMR); Neamţ - Vasile Ghiorghe Glica, Culiţă Tărâţă, Ioan Munteanu, Soreanu Raul Victor Surdu (PSD+PC), Eftimie Stelian Ghiţă, Mihaela Stoica, Marius Neculai, Marius Rogin (PDL), Emil Bostan (PNL), (UDMR); Olt - Marin Bobeş, Valeriu Andrei Steriu, Florin Iordache, Doru Claudian Frunzulică (PSD+PC), Daniel Ionuţ Bărbulescu, Nicolae Stan, Florin Serghei Anghel (PDL), Gigel Sorinel Ştirbu (PNL); Prahova - Florin Anghel (PSD) Marian Florian Săniuţă, Mihai Cristian Apostolache, Răzvan Ţurea, Adrian Năstase (PSD+PC), George Ionescu, Sever Voinescu, Roberta Alma Anastase, Andrei Valentin Sava (PDL), Cristian Ion Burlacu, Graţiela Leocadia Gavrilescu, Ana Adriana Săftoiu (PNL); Satu Mare - Gheorghe Ciocan (PSD+PC), Ioan Holdiş (PDL), Viorel Vasile Buda (PNL), Attila Varga, Doloczki Istvan Erdei (UDMR); Sălaj - Iuliu Nosa (PSD+PC), Lucian Nicolae Bode (PDL), Gheorghe Mirel Taloş (PNL), Denes Seres (UDMR); Sibiu - Ioan Cindrea, Silvestru Lup (PSD+PC), Cornel Ştirbeţ, Raluca Turcan, Gheorghe Roman (PDL), Mircea Vasile Cazan (PNL), (UDMR); Suceava - Cătălin Nechifor, Ioan Stan, Eugen Bejinariu (PSD+PC), Sanda Ardeleanu, Ioan Bălan, Eugen Uricec, Dumitru Pardău, Gabriel Gospodaru (PDL), Mircea Irimescu, Gheorghe Coroamă (PNL); Teleorman - Robert Negoiţă, Nicolae Bănicioiu (PSD+PC), Adrian Bădulescu, Adrian Florescu (PDL), George Dumitrică, Marin Almăjanu (PNL); Timiş - Maria Barna, Sorin Stragea, Dorel Covaci (PSD+PC), Iosif Drăgulescu, Marius Dugulescu, Alin Popoviciu, Valeriu Tabără, Gheorghe Ciobanu (PDL), Horia Cristian, Claudiu Ţaga (PNL); Tulcea- Horia Teodorescu (PSD+PC), Marian Avram, Mihai Stroe (PDL), Octavian Popa (PNL); Vaslui - Victor Cristea, Adrian Solomon, Marian Sârbu (PSD+PC), Dragoş Iftime, Viorel Cărare (PDL), Dan Bordeianu, Dan Marian (PNL), (UDMR); Vâlcea - Constantin Mazilu, Vasile Bleotu, Aurel Vlădoiu (PSD+PC), Sorin Ştefan Zamfirescu, Samoil Vâlcu (PDL), Cristian Buican (PNL), (UDMR); Vrancea - Angel Tâlvar, Cristian Sorin Dumitrescu, Nicolae Ciprian Nica (PSD+PC), Şerban Răzvan Mustea, Alin Silviu Trăşculescu (PDL), Nini Săpunaru (PNL); Bucureşti - Costică Canacheu, Brânduşa Novac, Theodor Paleologu, Cătălin Croitoru, Sulfina Barbu, Cristian Petrescu, Ştefan Pirpiliu, Dan Radu Zătreanu, Silviu Prigoană, Florian Geantă, Elena Udrea şi Dănuţ Liga (PDL); Georgian Pop, Rodica Nassar, Florian Popa, Sergiu Andon, Florina Jipa, Doina Burcău, Oana Mizil, Dumitru Chiriţă, Aura Vasile şi Damian Florea, Daniela Popa (PSD+PC); Bogdan Olteanu, Dan Stamate Budurescu, Ludovic Orban, Alina Gorghiu şi Cornel Pieptea (PNL); Diaspora - Tudor Panţîru (PSD+PC), William Gabriel Brînză, Mircea Lubanovici (PDL), Iosif Koto (UDMR)..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Monitoring Facebook. Presidential Elections – Romania, November 2019
    Monitoring Facebook. Presidential Elections – Romania, November 2019 A report drafted by GlobalFocus Center, Bucharest, in cooperation with MEMO98, Bratislava. Supported by Democracy Reporting International, Berlin. Monitoring Facebook. Presidential Elections – Romania, November 2019 Monitoring Facebook. Presidential Elections – Romania, November 2019 February, 2019 Bucharest, Romania This project was supported by Civitates Monitoring Facebook. Presidential Elections – Romania, November 2019 GlobalFocus Center is an independent international studies’ think tank that produces in-depth research and high-quality analysis on foreign policy, security, European aairs, good governance, and development. Our purpose is to advance expertise by functioning as a platform for cooperation and dialogue among individual experts, NGOs, think-tanks, and public institutions from Romania and foreign partners. We have built, and tested over 10 dierent countries a unique research methodology, proactively approaching the issue of malign interference by analysing societies' structural, weaponisable vulnerabilities. We are building a multi-stakeholder Stratcom platform, for identifying an optimal way of initiating and conducting unied responses to hybrid threats. Our activities are focused on fostering regional security and contributing to the reection process of EU reforms. During November 1-24, 2019, GlobalFocus Center, in cooperation with MEMO98 and Democracy Reporting International (DRI), monitored Facebook during the 10 and 24 November presidential election polls in Romania. AUTHORS GlobalFocus Center: Ana Maria Luca, Run Zamr (editor) ANALYSTS: Alexandra Mihaela Ispas, Ana Maria Teaca, Vlad Iavita, Raluca Andreescu MEMO98: Rasťo Kužel Monitoring Facebook. Presidential Elections – Romania, November 2019 Contents I. INTRODUCTION 4 II. HIGHLIGHTS 5 III. CONTEXT 6 III.1 TRUST IN MEDIA AND SOCIAL MEDIA CONSUMPTION IN ROMANIA 6 III.2 PUBLIC ATTITUDES AND TRUST IN INSTITUTIONS 7 III.3 THE NOVEMBER 2019 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION 7 IV.
    [Show full text]
  • Annales D’Université “Valahia” Târgovi2te, Section D’Archéologie Et D’Histoire, Tome X, Nombre 2, 2008, ISSN 1584-1855
    https://biblioteca-digitala.ro Annales d’Université “Valahia” Târgovi2te, Section d’Archéologie et d’Histoire, Tome X, Nombre 2, 2008, ISSN 1584-1855 Trade and handicrafts in the urban areas in the political circumstances of the 17th and 18th centuries 1tefan 1chiopu* * Universitatea „Valahia” din Târgovi2te, Facultatea de 1tiinXe Umaniste, Str. Lt. Stancu Ion, nr. 34-36, 130108, Târgovi2te, jud. DâmboviXa, e-mail: [email protected] Keywords: trade, craft, Moldavia, market, guild, city, town, Ottoman Empire, 17th and 18th centuries Abstract: Moldavia’s economy during the 17th and the 18th centuries it’s more and more affected by the needs of the suzerain power which consolidates its position as a primordial pole in the orientation of the productive activities. The requests of The Ottoman Porte (concerning grain, cattle and other animal products) which are growing as they try to keep the integrity of the empire, impose a more important role for the grain and cattle forming economy in the area between the Carpathians and the Danube. A consequence of this reality is the birth of the great boyard’s and monastic estates, a process which began a century before, having many consequences on the economy in general and especially on the limitation of the processing degree of some raw materials. The importance of the Romanian Countries for the Ottoman Empire in this context, the underestimation of the Romanian products sold on the Ottoman market, paying in nature (grain and cattle) some debts of some voivodes, or for the annual tribute paid to the Porte, plus the needs of the Ottoman army hired in different military missions, all these made the court and the suzerain power to be both interested in expanding the feudal estates that will produce for satisfying the Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • DECISION No. 1.657 of 28 December 2010 Regarding the Constitutionality Review of the Provisions of the 2011 State Budget Law
    Translation provided by Lawyers Collective and partners for the Global Health and Human Rights Database (www.globalhealthrights.org) DECISION No. 1.657 of 28 December 2010 regarding the constitutionality review of the provisions of the 2011 State Budget Law ISSUING AUTHORITY: THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT PUBLISHED IN: THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL No. 33 of 13 January 2011 The case pending refers to the constitutionality review regarding the 2011 State Budget Law. The case was introduced by a group of 54 deputies, according to Art. 146, pt. (a) of the Constitution. By Communication No. 51/6.183 of 23 December 2010, the General Secretary of the Chamber of Deputies submitted to the Constitutional Court, according to the provisions of Art. 146, pt. (a) of the Constitution and Art. 15, para.(1) and (4) of Law No. 47/1992 on the Organisation and Operation of the Constitutional Court, the submission for constitutionality review regarding the 2011 State Budget Law, drafted by a group of 54 deputies. The list containing the signatures of the 54 deputies, authors of the submission of constitutionality review, was attached to the application. According to this list, the authors of the unconstitutionality objection are the following: Cristian Mihai Adomniței, Marin Almăjanu, Teodor Atanasiu, Vasile Berci, Viorel-Vasile Buda, Daniel-Stamate Budurescu, Cristian Buican, Mihăiţă Calimente, Mircea Vasile Cazan, Daniel Chiţoiu, Tudor-Alexandru Chiuariu, Horia Cristian, Ciprian Minodor Dobre, Victor Paul Dobre, Mihai-Aurel Donţu, Gheorghe Dragomir, George Ionuţ Dumitrică,
    [Show full text]
  • Adrian Nastase
    Adrian Nastase Rumanía, Primer ministro Duración del mandato: 28 de Diciembre de 2000 - de de Nacimiento: Bucarest, 22 de Junio de 1950 Partido político: PSD Profesión : Profesor de Derecho ResumenEs hijo de Marian Nastase, un oficial del Ejército real que perdió sus galones tras el establecimiento de la república popular prosoviética en 1947, pero que luego se unió al Partido de los Trabajadores Rumanos (PMR, vuelto a llamar desde 1965 Partido Comunista Rumano, PCR) instalado en el poder. Nastase padre recobró su posición social y llegó a convertirse en miembro de la nomenklatura comunista, como director de departamento en el Ministerio de Educación. http://www.cidob.org 1 of 17 Biografía El joven, siendo aún un estudiante, tomó en matrimonio a una hija de un alto dignatario del partido, Grigore Preoteasa, quien fuera desde 1955 y hasta su fallecimiento en 1957 miembro del Comité Central y ministro de Asuntos Exteriores, pero este enlace terminó en divorcio. Años más tarde, Nastase contrajo segundas nupcias con Dana Miculescu, que también era hija de un preboste del PCR, Angelo Miculescu, varias veces ministro de Agricultura, Silvicultura y Alimentación entre 1969 y 1981, amén de viceprimer ministro desde 1975 y miembro del Comité Central del PCR hasta 1983. El matrimonio Nastase-Miculescu ha tenido dos hijos, Andrei y Minhea. Doblemente licenciado por la Universidad de Bucarest en las especialidades de Derecho (1973) y de Sociología (1978), tras obtener la primera titulación entró de becario en el Instituto de Investigación Legal de la capital rumana y en 1977 comenzó una carrera docente como profesor asociado de Derecho Internacional Público en la Academia de Estudios Económicos de su universidad.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender and Elections in Romania
    GENDER AND ELECTIONS IN ROMANIA ABSTRACT UNDP has been undertaking a series of case study research projects about the opportunities and challenges for ZRPHQ¶VSDUWLFLSDWLRQDVYoters in the Europe CIS region. The present case study presents an analysis of gender and the electoral legislation reform process in Romania, focusing on two aspects of the legal framework factor: WKHHIIHFWRIWKHHOHFWRUDOV\VWHPRQZRPHQ¶VSDUWLFLSDWLRQDQGJHQGHUTXRWDVDVPHDQVRIHQKDQFLQJZRPHQ¶V descriptive representation. An important entry point is to acknowledge that low participation and representation of ZRPHQLVDVHULRXVLVVXHWKDWLPSDFWV5RPDQLD¶VGHPRFUDWL]DWLRQSURFHVV2QWKLVSDWKWRZDrds gender equality in politics, representatives of civil society should be carefully monitoring political actors who may have learned and are skilled at using the discourse of gender equality, but less so the practice. Future public discussions and debates on political participation and representation should focus on the role of political parties in shaping specific democratic differences. The debates should also emphasize the role of the electoral system in ensuring adequate representation of women. If change towards more gender equality in politics is needed, the joint efforts of all key actors are required. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 1. INTRODUCTION 5 2. METHODOLOGY 6 3. BACKGROUND: WOMEN IN POLITICS BEFORE 1989 7 3.1 RECLAIMING POLITICAL RIGHTS: 19TH AND EARLY 20TH CENTURY 7 3.2 POLITICAL COMRADES DURING COMMUNISM: 1947-1989 8 4. BACKGROUND: WOMEN IN POLITICS AFTER 1989 9 4.1 WOMEN IN THE PARLIAMENT AND LOCAL POLITICS 9 4.2 GENDER EQUALITY AND THE LEGISLATIVE ELECTORAL FRAMEWORK 10 4.3 MORE WOMEN IN POLITICS: FIGHTING FOR GENDER QUOTAS 12 4.3.1 Mandatory (Legislative) Gender Quotas 12 4.3.2 Voluntary (Party) Gender Quotas 13 4.4 INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT FOR MORE WOMEN IN POLITICS: UNDP 14 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Report
    GOVERNMENT OF ROMANIA NATIONAL AGENCY FOR THE ROMA 14 Viitorului St. Tel: 40 – 21 – 211.30.37 Bucharest 2 Fax: 40 – 21 – 211.05.95 PROGRESS REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GOVERNMENT STRATEGY FOR IMPROVING THE CONDITION OF THE ROMA APRIL 2003 - JUNE 2005 -- Bucharest, September 2005 -- 1 Table of contents: TABLE OF CONTENTS:.................................................................................................................................................................. 2 THE ROMANIAN GOVERNMENT’S POLICY OF IMPROVING THE CONDITION OF THE ROMA............................. 3 EVALUATING THE ACHIEVEMENT OF THE OBJECTIVES STATED IN THE NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR IMPROVING THE CONDITION OF THE ROMA ...................................................................................................................... 7 INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURES ............................................................................................................................................................ 7 EU FUNDS FOR THE NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR IMPROVING THE CONDITION OF THE ROMA ........................................................... 13 IMMEDIATE GOVERNMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY : CENTRAL AND LOCAL AUTHORITIES ...................................................................... 16 1. Local Public Administration and Community Development .............................................................................................. 16 2. Housing .............................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Text
    Courant Research Centre ‘Poverty, Equity and Growth in Developing and Transition Countries: Statistical Methods and Empirical Analysis’ Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (founded in 1737) Discussion Papers No. 266 Home bias in humanitarian aid: The role of regional favoritism in the allocation of international disaster relief Christian Bommera, Axel Dreher, Marcello Perez-Alvarez September 2019 Platz der Göttinger Sieben 5 ⋅ 37073 Goettingen ⋅ Germany Phone: +49-(0)551-3921660 ⋅ Fax: +49-(0)551-3914059 Email: [email protected] Web: http://www.uni-goettingen.de/crc-peg Home bias in humanitarian aid: The role of regional favoritism in the allocation of international disaster relief Christian Bommera (University of Goettingen, Heidelberg University) Axel Dreherb (Heidelberg University, University of Goettingen, KOF, CEPR, CESifo) Marcello Perez-Alvarezc (University of Goettingen) Abstract This paper investigates whether regional favoritism shapes humanitarian aid flows. Using a rich and unique dataset derived from reports of the Office of US Foreign Disaster Assistance (OFDA), we show that substantially larger amounts of aid are disbursed when natural disasters hit the birth region of the recipient countries’ political leader. While we find no evidence that US commercial or political interests affect the size of this home bias, the bias is stronger in countries with a weaker bureaucracy and governance, suggesting the absence of effective safeguards in the allocation of aid. Keywords: humanitarian aid, natural disasters, regional favoritism, birth regions Acknowledgments: We thank Cooper Drury and Thomas Eisensee for generously sharing their OFDA data. We further thank Stephan Klasen, Sven Kunze, Sebastian Vollmer and conference participants at ETH Zürich (AEL 2018), MIT (IPES 2018) and Oxford University (CSAE 2019) for helpful comments, as well as Patrick Betz, Theresa Geyer, Adrian Monninger, Friederike Schilling, and Wangzhen Xia for excellent research assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Freeex Report P R E S S F R E E D O M I N R O M a N I a 2 0 0 9
    FREEEX REPORT P R E S S F R E E D O M I N R O M A N I A 2 0 0 9 - Member of the Reporters without Borders Network - Bucharest 2010 FREEEX REPORT P R E S S F R E E D O M I N R O M A N I A 2 0 0 9 - Member of the Reporters without Borders Network - This report was compiled within the FreeEx Program of ActiveWatch - the Media Monitoring Agency. Freedom of Expression Program - FreeEx was started by ActiveWatch - the Media Monitoring Agency in August 1999, with a view to contribute to the protection and promotion of the right to free expression and to press freedom. ActiveWatch - the Media Monitoring Agency publishes annual reports on press freedom situation in Romania. This report is funded by the Open Society Institute (OSI). The content of this report does not necessarily reflect the opinion of OSI. Authors: Liana Ganea Răzvan Martin Ştefan Cândea Maria Adriana Popa Vlad Ursulean We wish to thank to all those who contributed to this report: Nicoleta Fotiade, Ionuț Codreanu, Ioana Avădani, Cezar Ion, Petrișor Obae, Dan Duca, Mihaela Enache – Mihiș. We wish to thank for the expertise provided to the FreeEx department during the entire year: Mircea Toma, Diana Hatneanu, Dan Mihai, Bogdan Manolea, Doru Costea, Iulia Mălăescu. We wish to thank all journalists who published news and features about the media, and especialy to HotNews, Mediafax, Paginademedia.ro and ReporterVirtual.ro Layout and design: Alexandra Cândea Dan Ichimescu Donors: Open Society Institute © Media Monitoring Agency Member of the Reporters without Borders Network Address: 98 Calea Plevnei, BL.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetically Engineered Soybean Cultivation in Romania: out of Control
    Genetically engineered soybean cultivation in Romania: Out of control By Gabriel PAUN Greenpeace Central and Eastern Europe January 2006 V.i.S.d.P.: Gabriel Paun, Greenpeace Central an Eastern Europe, Siebenbrunnengasse 44, A-1050 Wien Contents Contents............................................................................................................................................ 2 2Executive Summary........................................................................................................................ 3 3GE Soya and Romanian agriculture................................................................................................5 3.1Structure of Romanian agriculture ..........................................................................................5 3.2Soybean farming...................................................................................................................... 5 3.3GE soybean growing................................................................................................................6 3.4The Legal Framework for GE crops .......................................................................................6 4Greenpeace findings on GE Soya cultivation and contamination ................................................. 7 5Weak systems of monitoring and control....................................................................................... 8 6Pushing GE crops in Romania.......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ii.Din Activitatea Grupurilor Parlamentare Din Camera Deputaţilor..…………………………
    Camera Deputatilor Newsletter : săptămâna 5 iunie – 9 iunie 2006 Stimaţi abonaţi, Vă transmitem sinteza săptămânală a activităţii Camerei Deputaţilor, cu speranţa că o veţi considera utilă în activitatea dumneavoastră. Direcţia pentru comunicare, presă şi relaţii publice a Camerei Deputaţilor I.SINTEZA LEGISLATIVĂ………………………………………….........2 A. Şedinţele în plen ale Camerei Deputaţilor (5 iunie - 9 iunie 2006) ……................2 B. Situaţia iniţiativelor legislative aflate în procedură legislativă la Camera Deputaţilor (sesiunea feb. – iun. a.c.)………..………………………............................................3 C.Situaţia iniţiativelor legislative aflate pe ordine de zi a Camerei Deputaţilor…..........4 D.Situaţia proiectelor de legi votate de plen……………………………………............5 E.Stadiul proiectelor de legi............................................................................................11 Anexă..............................................................................................................................12 F.Programul legislativ prioritar pentru integrarea in Uniunea Europeană.....................19 Anexa.........................................................................................................................20 G. Bilanţul activităţii comisiilor permanente…..……………………… ......................28 Rapoarte depuse de comisiile permanente..……………………………...................29 II.DIN ACTIVITATEA GRUPURILOR PARLAMENTARE DIN CAMERA DEPUTAŢILOR..………………………….......................................36 - Grupul parlamentar al
    [Show full text]
  • Ministru Ministerul De Interne Mihai Chițac Doru-Viorel Ursu Victor
    Ministru Ministerul de interne Mihai Chi țac Doru-Viorel Ursu Victor Babiuc George-Ioan Dănescu Doru-Ioan Tărăcilă Gavril Dejeu Constantin-Dudu Ionescu Ioan Rus Marian Săniu ță Vasile Blaga Cristian David Gabriel Oprea Liviu Dragnea Dan Nica Vasile Blaga Vasile Blaga Traian Iga ș Gabriel Berca Ioan Rus Mircea Du șa Radu Stroe Gabriel Oprea Petre Tobă Drago ș Tudorache Media mandatului la Interne Ministerul de externe Sergiu Celac Adrian Năstase Teodor Mele șcanu Adrian Severin Andrei Ple șu Petre Roman Mircea Geoană Mihai Răzvan Ungureanu Călin Popescu Tăriceanu Adrian Cioroianu Lazăr Comănescu Cristian Diaconescu Cătălin Predoiu (interimar) Theodor Baconschi Cristian Diaconescu Andrei Marga Titus Corlă țean Teodor Mele șcanu Bogdan Aurescu Lazăr Comănescu Media mandatului la Externe Ministerul finantelor Ion Pă țan Theodor Stolojan Eugen Dijmărescu George Danielescu Florin Georgescu Mircea Ciumara Daniel Dăianu Decebal Traian Reme ș Mihai Nicolae Tănăsescu Ionu ț Popescu Sebastian Vlădescu Varujan Vosganian Gheorghe Pogea Sebastian Vlădescu Gheorghe Ialomi țianu Bogdan Alexandru Drăgoi Florin Georgescu Daniel Chi țoiu Ioana Petrescu Darius Bogdan Vâlcov Victor Ponta Eugen Teodorovici Anca Paliu Dragu Viorel Ștefan Ionu ț Mișa Media mandatului la Finan țe Educatie Andrei Marga Ecaterina Andronescu Alexandru Athanasiu Mircea Miclea Mihai Hărdău Cristian Adomni ței Anton Anton Daniel Funeriu Cătălin Baba Liviu Pop Ecaterina Andronescu Remus Pricopie Sorin Cîmpeanu Adrian Curaj Mircea Dumitru Pavel Nastase Liviu Pop Media mandatului la Educatie
    [Show full text]
  • Nicknames of Romanian Politicians After 1989
    Nicknames of Romanian Politicians after 1989 Daiana FELECAN, Oliviu FELECAN Key-words: nicknames, political discourse, pragmalinguistics, semantics, sociolinguistics 1. Preliminaries 1.1. Politicians’ nicknames – strategies of argumentum ad hominem1 The present-day world of Romanian politics takes the shape of a theatre of operations from a warring area, a Gaza Strip whose property deed is continually claimed by parties found at either ends of the political spectrum. These parties insult one another publicly, suspect and tell on one another to the National Anticorruption Directorate. They even listen in on their private conversations and discredit each other by means of compromising films. All the aforementioned events, alongside many others, unfold before the alert yet blind eyes and under the allegedly fair consideration of a system of justice that is overwhelmed by the multitude of penal cases pending before courts of law, with ever-postponed trial dates. Nicknames have become means of attack, picked by belligerent interlocutors from the arsenal at hand. They are prolonged-release antidotes used to destroy opponents and their effect is visible in the long run, as nicknames become part of users’ collective memory. When this happens, speakers associate a nicknamed individual with the verbal tag considered emblematic of the nickname bearer. Contemporary Romanian society appears to be increasingly oblivious of the principles that underlie its foundation (politeness, promoting respect in interpersonal relationships and acknowledging the distribution of social roles). As a result, the psychological and linguistic profile of Romanian society was altered along with the institution of democracy after 1989. The consequences of hastily adopting a recently imported configuration, unspecific to a community that is respectful of traditional values yet anxious to follow the pace of globalisation and Americanisation at once and at any cost, are also salient in one of the most prolific language compartments, i.e.
    [Show full text]