Official Journal C 280 E Volume 46 of the European Union 21 November 2003

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Official Journal C 280 E Volume 46 of the European Union 21 November 2003 ISSN 1725-2423 Official Journal C 280 E Volume 46 of the European Union 21 November 2003 English edition Information and Notices Notice No Contents Page I (Information) EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT WRITTEN QUESTIONS WITH ANSWER (2003/C 280 E/001) E-2476/02 by Elizabeth Lynne to the Commission Subject: Protecting a National Park in Poland ....................................... 1 (2003/C 280 E/002) E-2498/02 by Richard Corbett to the Commission Subject: Baltic Corridor .................................................... 2 (2003/C 280 E/003) E-2511/02 by Mihail Papayannakis to the Commission Subject: EU code of conduct on the export of arms and weapon systems to third countries ............. 3 (2003/C 280 E/004) E-2514/02 by Alexandros Alavanos to the Commission Subject: Applicant countries and Regulation (EEC) 1408/71 ............................... 4 (2003/C 280 E/005) E-2554/02 by Catherine Stihler to the Commission Subject: Malta’s accession to the EU and the Wild Birds Directive ............................ 5 (2003/C 280 E/006) E-2564/02 by Anna Karamanou to the Commission Subject: Women in black 7th anniversary of the Srebrenica massacre ........................ 5 (2003/C 280 E/007) E-2568/02 by Robert Evans to the Commission Subject: Defamation charges against Bruce Harris of Casa Alianza in Guatemala .................... 6 (2003/C 280 E/008) P-2591/02 by Gian Gobbo to the Commission Subject: Priority to be given to Argentineans of European origin as far as immigration from outside the Community is concerned .......................................................... 7 (2003/C 280 E/009) E-2596/02 by Stavros Xarchakos to the Commission Subject: Destruction of ancient Greek and Roman monuments in Turkey ....................... 8 (2003/C 280 E/010) E-2601/02 by Ilda Figueiredo to the Commission Subject: Regulation on crossborder payments in euros .................................. 9 EN (Continued) Notice No Contents (continued) Page (2003/C 280 E/011) E-2607/02 by Graham Watson to the Commission Subject: EU aid to Afghanistan ............................................... 10 (2003/C 280 E/012) E-2641/02 by Daniel Hannan to the Commission Subject: EU sanctions damaging EU businesses ...................................... 11 (2003/C 280 E/013) E-2870/02 by Christopher Huhne to the Commission Subject: Economic assumptions ............................................... 12 (2003/C 280 E/014) E-3111/02 by Charles Tannock to the Commission Subject: State aids to the French electricity sector ..................................... 12 (2003/C 280 E/015) E-3255/02 by Daniel Hannan to the Commission Subject: Pressure on greenfield sites because of EU top-up subsidies rules ....................... 13 (2003/C 280 E/016) P-3352/02 by Baroness Sarah Ludford to the Commission Subject: EC Petition 566/2000 ............................................... 15 (2003/C 280 E/017) E-3473/02 by Herbert Bösch to the Commission Subject: The Commission’s new accounting officer .................................... 15 (2003/C 280 E/018) E-3475/02 by Benedetto Della Vedova to the Commission Subject: State aid for public broadcasting companies ................................... 16 (2003/C 280 E/019) E-3488/02 by Charles Tannock and Christopher Heaton-Harris to the Commission Subject: Fraud in the European Union and the disciplining of Marta Andreasen .................... 18 (2003/C 280 E/020) E-3615/02 by Benedetto Della Vedova and Marco Cappato to the Commission Subject: State aid for France Telecom from the French Government ........................... 21 (2003/C 280 E/021) E-3616/02 by Erik Meijer to the Commission Subject: Regular and safe maritime shipping services on fixed routes jeopardised by ban on price agreements and authorisation to award secret discounts .......................................... 22 (2003/C 280 E/022) E-3754/02 by Jan Andersson to the Commission Subject: Application of the Schengen Agreement at Frankfurt airport .......................... 24 (2003/C 280 E/023) E-3767/02 by Erik Meijer to the Commission Subject: Financial barriers to visits by relatives and elderly tourists from Russia travelling via future EU territory to Kaliningrad .......................................................... 25 (2003/C 280 E/024) E-3777/02 by Christopher Huhne to the Commission Subject: Pirelli production .................................................. 26 (2003/C 280 E/025) E-3782/02 by Erik Meijer to the Commission Subject: Combination of parliamentary democracy with the right to decentralised decisions and diversity within a new institutional structure of the EU ............................................ 27 (2003/C 280 E/026) P-3784/02 by Diana Wallis to the Commission Subject: Infringement proceedings .............................................. 28 (2003/C 280 E/027) E-3860/02 by Mogens Camre to the Commission Subject: Minority Commission decision to draw up a draft treaty ............................ 29 (2003/C 280 E/028) E-3902/02 by Mogens Camre to the Commission Subject: Commission funding of production of an unofficial draft treaty ........................ 29 (2003/C 280 E/029) E-0034/03 by Esko Seppänen to the Commission Subject: The Penelope plan ................................................. 30 Joint answer to Written Questions E-3860/02, E-3902/02 and E-0034/03 . 30 (2003/C 280 E/030) E-3865/02 by Jules Maaten and Lousewies van der Laan to the Council Subject: Indonesia’s ad hoc tribunals on East Timor .................................... 30 (2003/C 280 E/031) E-3874/02 by Salvador Garriga Polledo to the Council Subject: Improved European military resources for a greater margin of autonomy ................... 31 EN (Continued) Notice No Contents (continued) Page (2003/C 280 E/032) E-3888/02 by Olivier Dupuis to the Commission Subject: New wave of repression in Tunisia ........................................ 32 (2003/C 280 E/033) E-3910/02 by Eija-Riitta Korhola to the Commission Subject: Discriminatory nature of vehicle financing in Finland .............................. 33 (2003/C 280 E/034) E-0002/03 by Olivier Dupuis to the Commission Subject: Condemnation of Mr Nguyen Khac Toan ..................................... 34 (2003/C 280 E/035) E-0060/03 by Camilo Nogueira Román to the Council Subject: Rejection by the Council of the European Parliament and Commission proposal concerning the establishment of a COPE fund from which to pay compensation for pollution caused by oil spills ......... 35 (2003/C 280 E/036) E-0121/03 by Bob van den Bos to the Council Subject: North Korean refugees ............................................... 36 (2003/C 280 E/037) P-0124/03 by Seán Ó Neachtain to the Commission Subject: Special tax designated areas and the west of Ireland ............................... 37 (2003/C 280 E/038) E-0133/03 by José Ribeiro e Castro to the Commission Subject: Portuguese on Euronews .............................................. 37 (2003/C 280 E/039) P-0164/03 by Francesco Speroni to the Commission Subject: Competition between banks ............................................ 38 (2003/C 280 E/040) E-0172/03 by Theresa Villiers to the Commission Subject: Equitable Life .................................................... 39 (2003/C 280 E/041) E-0191/03 by Erik Meijer to the Council Subject: The increasing extent to which US criteria are being put forward for acceptance or refusal of new Member States by the EU ....................................................... 40 (2003/C 280 E/042) E-0220/03 by Marco Cappato to the Council Subject: Drug-related escalation of violence in Bolivia .................................. 41 (2003/C 280 E/043) E-0231/03 by Antonios Trakatellis to the Commission Subject: Input of Community resources into the Greek economy ............................ 42 (2003/C 280 E/044) E-0232/03 by Eluned Morgan to the Commission Subject: End-of-Life Vehicles Directive ........................................... 44 (2003/C 280 E/045) E-0236/03 by Isidoro Sánchez García to the Commission Subject: Treatment of the outermost regions of the European Union under the mid-term reform of the CAP ... 44 (2003/C 280 E/046) E-0257/03 by Caroline Jackson to the Commission Subject: Health conditions on French canals ........................................ 45 (2003/C 280 E/047) P-0291/03 by Giuseppe Pisicchio to the Commission Subject: Illegal immigration ................................................. 46 (2003/C 280 E/048) E-0305/03 by Bart Staes to the Commission Subject: Price increases resulting from the introduction of the euro ........................... 48 (2003/C 280 E/049) E-0313/03 by Proinsias De Rossa to the Commission Subject: Compliance with EU legislation .......................................... 48 (2003/C 280 E/050) E-0334/03 by Cristiana Muscardini to the Council Subject: NATO enlargement and the European Union’s defence policy ......................... 49 (2003/C 280 E/051) P-0345/03 by Hans-Peter Martin to the Council Subject: HGV transit problems ............................................... 50 (2003/C 280 E/052) E-0358/03 by Baroness Sarah Ludford to the Council Subject: Iraq .......................................................... 51 (2003/C 280 E/053) E-0361/03 by Roberta Angelilli to the Commission Subject: Holding company called ‘Newco’ set up by Rome City Council suspected infringement of competition rules .............................................................. 51 EN (Continued) Notice No Contents (continued) Page (2003/C 280 E/054) P-0365/03 by Olivier Dupuis
Recommended publications
  • ITA Parliamentary 2013
    Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights THE ITALIAN REPUBLIC EARLY PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS 24 and 25 February 2013 OSCE/ODIHR NEEDS ASSESSMENT MISSION REPORT 7-10 January 2013 Warsaw 22 January 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 1 II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................... 1 III. FINDINGS .............................................................................................................................................. 3 A. BACKGROUND AND POLITICAL CONTEXT ............................................................................................. 3 B. LEGAL FRAMEWORK ............................................................................................................................. 3 C. ELECTORAL SYSTEM ............................................................................................................................. 4 D. ELECTION ADMINISTRATION ................................................................................................................. 5 E. VOTING METHODS ................................................................................................................................ 6 F. VOTER RIGHTS AND REGISTRATION ...................................................................................................... 7 G. CANDIDATE RIGHTS AND REGISTRATION
    [Show full text]
  • SB I Knew Him Well Press Book Eng 2
    MARIANNA DE LISO, SIMONE GATTONI, ENRICA GONELLA Present S.B. I KNEW HIM WELL S.B. IO LO CONOSCEVO BENE A documentary by GIACOMO DURZI & GIOVANNI FASANELLA press screening: Tuesday November 13th l h. 07:30 p.m. l sala Studio 3 Auditorium official screening: Wednesday November 14 th l h. 04:30 p.m. l Sala Petrassi additional screening: Thursday November 15 th l h. 04:00 p.m. l Sala Cinema 2 S.B. Io lo conoscevo bene ● S.B. I Knew Him Well ● Technical Sheet Written and Directed by Giacomo Durzi & Giovanni Fasanella Supervising Editor Paola Freddi Editor Tommaso Valente and Francesco De Matteis Photography Beppe Gallo Annimation Giacomo Nanni Original Music Valerio Vigliar Sound Valeria Cocuzza Produced by Marianna De Liso, Simone Gattoni, Enrica Gonella Production Kinesis Film In partnership with The Lazio Region Nationality Italia Year of production 2012 Duration 74’ Format HD Sound Stereo International Sales INTRAMOVIES Via Manfredi 15 – 00197 Rome – Italy tel. +39.06.8077252 – fax. 06.8076156 [email protected] Press Office STORYFINDERS Lionella Bianca Fiorillo +39.340.7364203 Alessandra Izzo +39.335.6882776 Via A. Allegri da Correggio 11 - 00196 Rome - ITALY +39.06.88972779 +39.340.7364203 [email protected] [email protected] http://www.facebook.com/S.B.ioloconoscevobene credits not contractual S.B. Io lo conoscevo bene ● S.B. I Knew Him Well ● Synopsis Silvio Berlusconi rose from cruise ship entertainer to become a successful entrepreneur, and then Prime Minister of Italy. Suddenly, when he was just a hair's breadth away from attaining the highest and most sought- after office in Italy, the Quirinale, his ascent came to an abrupt halt.
    [Show full text]
  • Speciale NOMOS Ministri E Sottosegretari Governo Draghi
    I ministri e i sottosegretari del Governo Draghi 25 febbraio 2021 Mario Draghi Nato a Roma il 3 settembre 1947. Rimase orfano di entrambi i genitori quando aveva 15 anni. Si è laureato in Economia nel 1970 all’Università La Sapienza di Roma con una tesi su Integrazione economica e variazione dei tassi di cambio. Si è poi specializzato al Massachusetts Institute of Technology di Boston dove ha conseguito un PhD con una tesi intitolata Essays on Economic Theory and Applications. Nel 1982 comincia una brillante carriera pubblica come consigliere del ministro del Tesoro Giovanni Goria, fino a diventare direttore generale del Tesoro nel 1991. La sua carriera prosegue poi in Goldman Sachs fino al 2005 quando viene nominato Governatore della Banca d’Italia, diventando promotore di diverse riforme e di un profondo processo di modernizzazione dell’Istituto. Nel maggio del 2011 viene nominato presidente della Bce, in un momento in cui l’Unione Europea si trova a fronteggiare gli effetti della crisi economica del 2008 e successivamente di quella del 2012. In quest’ultimo frangente, Draghi pronunciò il discorso più importante della sua carriera e uno dei più importanti della storia Europea. Durante un forum di investitori a Londra annunciò che la Bce avrebbe fatto «whatever it takes» per salvare l’euro. Grazie a quell’intervento oggi viene celebrato come il salvatore dell’Europa e viene elogiato da tutti i leader europei per l’uscita dalla crisi e il successivo consolidamento economico e politico dell’Unione Europea stessa. Il suo nome è emerso con forza per superare la crisi politica del Governo Conte II.
    [Show full text]
  • Narrating Ars Aevi Re-Envisioning and Re-Shaping the Contemporary Art Museum of Sarajevo in the Urban Space
    Corso di Laurea magistrale in Economia e Gestione delle Arti e delle Attività Culturali Tesi di Laurea Narrating Ars Aevi Re-envisioning and Re-shaping the Contemporary Art Museum of Sarajevo in the Urban Space Relatore Ch. Prof. Michele Tamma Correlatori Ch. Prof. Daniele Goldoni Ch. Prof. Lauso Zagato Laureanda Silvia Maria Carolo Matricola 827921 Anno Accademico 2015 / 2016 Foreword ____________________________________________________________ 1 Chapter 1: Introduction _________________________________________________ 4 1.1 Museogenesis ____________________________________________________________ 4 1.2 Sarajevo: Historical Background & City Profile ______________________________ 5 1.3 Culture in Post-Dayton BiH _______________________________________________ 8 1.4 Re-imagining & Reshaping the Museum ____________________________________ 15 1.4.1 Three typologies, three phases ________________________________________________ 15 1.4.2 Still pending the museum ____________________________________________________ 17 1.4.3 Working Hypothesis ________________________________________________________ 19 1.4.4 Methodology ______________________________________________________________ 20 Chapter 2: Museum boundaries are getting weak: towards the physical dissemination ___________________________________________________________________ 24 2.1 Boundaries in museums: metaphors and tangible fences ______________________ 24 2.1.1 Introduction _______________________________________________________________ 24 2.1.2 Times of revolution _________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Pugwash Conferences on Science and World Affairs Unione Degli
    Pugwash Conferences on Science and World Affairs Unione degli Scienziati Per Il Disarmo – ONLUS in collaboration with Amministrazione Comunale – Rosignano Marittimo (LI) Centro Interdisciplinare Scienze per La Pace – Univ. di Pisa Centro Interdipartimentale Ricerche sulla Pace ``G.Nardulli’’ – Univ. ``A. Moro’’, Bari Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche Frontier Detectors for Frontier Physics Ricerca Fondamentale in Fisica 17TH CASTIGLIONCELLO INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE International Security in the Trump Era Pugwash-USPID Joint meeting September 21-23, 2017 – Villa Celestina – Castiglioncello (Livorno) Organizing Committee: Giuliano Colombetti, Diego Latella, Francesco Lenci, Claudia Vaughn SHORT BIOGRAPHIES Hussain Al-Shahristani served as Deputy Prime Minister for Energy (2010-14), Minister of Oil (2006-10) and Minister of Higher Education (2015-16) in the Iraqi government. He holds a Ph D degree in nuclear chemistry and was Chief Scientific Advisor to the Iraqi Atomic Energy Commission in 1979 and refusing to work on military nuclear programme, he was imprisoned for 11 years Massimo Artini is an entrepreneur in Information Tecnology since 1995. Elected in 2013, he is the Vice-President of the Defence Committee at the Chamber of Deputies. He works mainly to propose new laws and to reform the regulations of Defence and Foreign Affairs (concerning, for example, International Missions Law – 2016, Cyber Governance – 2017, Armaments Trade and Export Control – 2017). He is spokesman of Alternativa Libera (a new political force created by ten
    [Show full text]
  • World Congress Against the Death Penalty Oslo Reports
    6TH 21-23 WORLD CONGRESS JUNE AGAINST THE 2016 DEATH PENALTY OSLO REPORTS Acknowledgements CAHIERS DE L’ABOLITION ECPM would like to thank the States which sponsored the Congress, the financial and political partners, the NGO partners, the witnesses, the members of the Core Group, #4 the speakers, the members of the Advisory Panel, the members of the working groups, the volunteers and the participants of the 6th World Congress Against the Death Penalty. Sponsor States: Norway, Australia and France. Core Group Member States: Argentina, Australia, Benin, Spain, France, Mexico, the Principality of Monaco, Mongolia, Norway, Rwanda and Switzerland. Members of the Advisory Panel: Sandrine Ageorges-Skinner (ECPM), Robert Badinter, Raphaël Chenuil-Hazan (ECPM), Roger Hood, Aurélie Plaçais (WCADP), Ole Petter Ottersen (UiO) and Sinapan Samydorai (ADPAN) REPORTS Volunteer rapporteurs of the debates: Nkem Adeleye, Hannah Berg, Frida Bjørneseth, Per Høyland, Kaja Joval, Tzushuo Lui, Lelia Marcau, Ilaria Montagna, TH Trude Jacobsen Nytun, Rune Andre Tveit, Momoka Tamura and Richard Vyse. 6 WORLD CONGRESS Publication Director: Raphaël Chenuil-Hazan Editorial Management Team: Raphaël Chenuil-Hazan, Emmanuel Maistre, AGAINST THE DEATH PENALTY Seynabou Benga and Marie-Lina Samuel OSLO 2016 Coordination: Seynabou Benga Art Director: Bérangère Portalier Illustrations: Colombe Salvaresi Photos: Christophe Meireis Copy-editor: Olivier Pradel Translation: Morag Young Layout: Olivier Dechaud Printing: Imprim’ad hoc Ensemble contre la peine de mort 69, rue Michelet 93100 Montreuil – France www.abolition.fr © ECPM, 2017 LES CAHIERS DE L’ABOLITION CONTENTS #1 4th World Congress Against the Death Penalty • Geneva 2010 • Reports (2011) #2 Iran: the death penalty in question, (2014) A Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Eu National Parliaments and the Recognition of Palestine: “Really” Breaking New Ground Or “Just” Adding Further Support?
    Comillas Journal of International Relations | nº 06 | 040-060 [2016] [ISSN 2386-5776] 40 DOI: cir.i06.y2016.002 EU NATIONAL PARLIAMENTS AND THE RECOGNITION OF PALESTINE: “REALLY” BREAKING NEW GROUND OR “JUST” ADDING FURTHER SUPPORT? Los parlamentos nacionales de la UE y el reconocimiento de Palestina: ¿innovando «de verdad» o «solo» prestando más apoyo? Stelios Stavridis, Maria Gianniou, Andrea Cofelice ARAID/Universidad de Zaragoza, Athens University of Economics and Business, Autor Centro Studi sul Federalismo, Torino E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] The European Union´s diplomacy has always given great importance and attention to the Israe- li-Palestinian conflict. One key element in it is the question of the recognition of a Palestinian Abstract state. This article analyses this particular issue now that Sweden has recognized such a state, but it does so not only by looking at EU institutions and states: it also covers the reactions of three national parliaments: those of Spain, Italy and Greece. Thus, adding both to the literature on EU diplomacy and to that of parliamentary diplomacy, which is an emerging academic area of research. EU diplomacy; Israeli-Palestinian conflict; Palestine recognition; parliamentary diplomacy; Key words Spanish Parliament; Italian Parliament; Greek Parliament Diplomacia de la UE; conflicto palestino-israelí; reconocimiento palestino; diplomacia parlamen- taria; parlamento español; parlamento italiano; parlamento griego La diplomacia de la Unión Europea siempre ha prestado mucha atención al conflicto palestino- israelí. Uno de los elementos clave en ello es el reconocimiento de un estado palestino. Este artículo Resumen analiza este aspecto en particular ahora que Suecia ha reconocido tal estado, pero lo ha hecho no solo teniendo en cuenta a las instituciones y estados de la UE: también cubre las reacciones de tres parlamentos nacionales: los de España, Italia y Grecia.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Journal C 280 E Volume 43 of the European Communities 3 October 2000
    ISSN 0378-6986 Official Journal C 280 E Volume 43 of the European Communities 3 October 2000 English edition Information and Notices Notice No Contents Page I (Information) EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT WRITTEN QUESTIONS WITH ANSWER (2000/C 280 E/001) E-1829/99 by Anna Karamanou to the Council Subject: Smoking as a cause of ill-health in the world and EU policy .......................... 1 (2000/C 280 E/002) E-1912/99 by Konstantinos Hatzidakis to the Commission Subject: Substandard road construction funded by the 2nd Community Support Framework for Greece (Supplementary Answer) ................................................... 2 (2000/C 280 E/003) E-1955/99 by Gerhard Hager to the Commission Subject: Kosovo Agenda 2000 .............................................. 3 (2000/C 280 E/004) E-2014/99 by Maria Martens to the Commission Subject: Habit-forming substances added to cigarettes by the tobacco industry ..................... 4 (2000/C 280 E/005) P-2017/99 by Mihail Papayannakis to the Commission Subject: Report on quality control of 2nd CSF projects (Supplementary Answer) ................... 5 (2000/C 280 E/006) E-2034/99 by Glyn Ford to the Council Subject: Genetically modified crops ............................................. 6 (2000/C 280 E/007) E-2074/99 by Agnes Schierhuber to the Commission Subject: Market transparency in agriculture ........................................ 7 (2000/C 280 E/008) E-2096/99 by Christos Folias to the Commission Subject: The Y2K problem .................................................. 9 (2000/C 280 E/009) E-2129/99 by Brigitte Langenhagen to the Commission Subject: Fisheries policy of the European Commission in the next Millennium Round ................ 10 (2000/C 280 E/010) E-2156/99 by Roberta Angelilli to the Commission Subject: Utilisation of structural funds by the Latium Regional Council ........................
    [Show full text]
  • NATO 2021 Rebuilding the Consensus for a New Era Rome, the 9Th and the 10Th of June 2021
    NATO 2021 Rebuilding the consensus for a new era Rome, the 9th and the 10th of June 2021 Scan the QR Code to visit our website 1. Open the Camera app (iPhone) or go to Google’s Play Store, download the QR & Barcode app (Android) and then launch the app on your smartphone. // Apri l’app della fotocamera (iPhone), oppure l’app QR & Barcode (Android) scaricabile dal Play Store. 2. Hold your device steady for 2-3 seconds towards the QR Code you want to scan // Punta il dispositivo per 2-3 secondi sul codice QR che vuoi scansionare. 3. A window with a link to our webpage will appear // Si aprirà una finestra con un link al nostro website NATO 2021 Rebuilding the consensus for a new era Organised by the NATO Defense College Foundation in co-operation with the Fondazione Compagnia di San paolo, the NATO Public Diplomacy Division, MBDA, the NATO Defense College, and Eventboost Rome, the 9th and the 10th of June 2021 Venue: Live streamed from the Rome Cavalieri, A Waldorf Astoria Hotel Via Alberto Cadlolo, 101, Rome WEDNESDAY, 9TH OF JUNE 2021 15,00 – 15,15 CEST Welcome Remarks . Alessandro Minuto-Rizzo, President, NATO Defense College Foundation, Rome . Olivier Rittimann, Commandant, NATO Defense College, Rome 15,15 – 15,25 CEST INITIAL INTERVENTION Baiba Braže, Assistant Secretary General for Public Diplomacy, NATO HQ, Brussels (Virtual) 3 15,25 – 16,40 CEST SESSION 1 HOW TO REFOCUS NATO? The world is very different from the one the Alliance has known during the Cold War and its aftermaths.
    [Show full text]
  • The Debate About the Veiling Issue in 21St Century Italy” Presented at the SISP Conference, Florence, September 2013
    Luca Ozzano, University of Turin, “The Debate about the Veiling Issue in 21st Century Italy” Presented at the SISP Conference, Florence, September 2013 The Debate about the Veiling Issue in 21st Century Italy Luca Ozzano Dipartimento di Culture, politica e società – Università di Torino Lungodora Siena 100 A – 10153 Torino, Italy [email protected] Abstract : The issues related to the veil and other kinds of ‘Islamic’ female clothing have triggered fierce debates both in the West and in the Muslim World, particularly after 9/11 and the subsequent events. On the one hand, there is disagreement about the right of some Middle Eastern governments to impose such clothing to women by law. On the other, the increasing presence of wide Muslim communities in several Western countries has given rise to discussions about the acceptability of the veil (especially when it hides the face of a woman) because of concerns related to state secularism, but also to women’s rights and public security. This paper will analyse the debate about the veiling issue in the Italian context, to show the frames proposed by the different political actors (including not only political parties, but also other relevant actors, such as churches, intellectuals, etc.) and their evolution, from 2001 to 2013. The paper will show that many actors, both in the left and in the right, have significantly changed their way of framing the veiling issue as a consequence of a shift of the focus of the public discussion from concerns about women’s rights in Muslim-majority countries, to concerns about the legitimacy of Islamic clothing in Western schools and other public institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Diplomatic and Parliamentary Practice
    DIPLOMATIC AND PARLIAMENTARY PRACTICE (edited by Pietro Gargiulo, Marco Pertile and Paolo Turrini) VII. LAW OF THE SEA 1. NEGOTIATION AND SIGNATURE OF THE CAEN AGREEMENT ON THE DELIMITATION OF TERRITORIAL WATERS AND MARITIME JURISDICTION BETWEEN ITALY AND FRANCE At the beginning of February 2016, some members of the Parliament posed an urgent interpellation to the Sottosegretario di Stato per gli Affari esteri e la cooperazione internazionale (Undersecretary of State for Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation), Mr. Benedetto Della Vedova, and subsequently, to the Ministro degli Affari esteri e della cooperazione internazionale (Minister for Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation), Mr. Paolo Gentiloni Silveri, regarding the Caen Agreement between Italy and France on the delimitation of the territorial seas and of the zones under their national jurisdiction, signed on 21 March 2015, but thus far only ratified by France.1 The members of the Parliament were concerned that the Caen Agreement could erode the protection of Italian fishery resources and restrain Italian access to fisheries in the area off the Ligurian coast, where the commercially valuable red shrimp is found. They feared that the Agreement would raise environmental concerns and waive Italian rights over rich fishing waters, therefore affecting the Italian national interest and maritime rights. Against this background, on 12 February 2016, the Sottosegretario intervened before the Camera dei Deputati (Chamber of Deputies) (568th Meeting – XVII Legislature) clarifying the reasons for signing the Caen Agreement. He stated: “We deemed it appropriate that a general instrument be signed, to update and effectively regulate the Italian-French maritime boundaries, also in view of the provisions of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation of the 6Th Meeting of WCFSR
    Presentation of the 6th meeting of the World Congress for Freedom of Scientific Research ​ Tentative venue: Addis Ababa, February 2020 The Associazione Luca Coscioni and Science for Democracy intend to organize the 6th meeting ​ ​ of the World Congress for Freedom of Scientific Research in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia at the ​ ​ ​ beginning of 2020. The interaction between science and the decision-making process has always been at the center of the five meetings of the World Congress organized since 2004 by the Associazione. The final ​ ​ ​ declaration of the 5th session held at the European Parliament in Brussels in April 2018, states that “Participants believe that an international committee to promote ‘Science for Democracy’ should be promoted - and ​ remain available to participate in their different capacities and in any way deemed necessary - looking forward to the next World Congress meeting hoping that its sixth session can take place in a developing country that is ​ struggling to establish or reinforce its democratic institutions, the Rule of Law and that is promoting and protecting scientific progress”. ​ Science for Democracy is now an international platform that promotes the Rule of Law through ​ the affirmation of the “right of and to science”, the promotion of evidence-based debates to ​ foster human development and societal welfare. Science for Democracy aims to consolidate ​ ​ ​ democracy as the institutional framework that can promote inclusion, cooperation and, ​ among many other things, advance the right of and to science globally. ​ Issues central to the activities of Science for Democracy are the environment and its various ​ ​ ecosystems, human freedom, health and quality of life.
    [Show full text]