DOCSLIB.ORG

Oda Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Olympic Delivery Authority Annual Report and Accounts 2012–13 A summer to remember Inside front cover Olympic Delivery Authority Annual Report and Accounts 2012–13 Presented to Parliament pursuant to paragraphs 24(3) and 32 (4) of Schedule 1 of the London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Act 2006 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 16 July 2013 HC 398 London: The Stationery Office £21.25 © Olympic Delivery Authority (2013) The text of this document (this excludes, where present, the Royal Arms and all departmental and agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context The material must be acknowledged as Olympic Delivery Authority (2013) copyright and the document title specified. Where third party material has been identified, permission from the respective copyright holder must be sought. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] You can download this publication from www.gov.uk/oda ISBN: 9780102985085 Printed in the UK for The Stationery Office Limited on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office ID 2568347 07/13 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Contents Chairman’s foreword 4 Chief Operating Officer’s report 5 Financial Review 6 ODA Board 13 Summary of activity 18 Review Olympic Park venues 20 Other venues 34 During the Games 40 Priority themes 48 After the Games 51 Awards 54 Accounts Accounting Officer’s Report 58 Remuneration Report 67 Statement of Accounting Officer’s Responsibilities 71 Governance Statement 72 Audit Report and Opinion 78 Accounts 80 Notes to the Accounts 85 Appendix 1 110 S c h e d u l e 1 111 Chairman’s foreword It was a summer when dreams came on the Board of the Olympic Delivery true. London and the United Kingdom Authority, providing so many fresh staged a fantastic Olympic Games insights and adding their experience, that, as Jacques Rogge said, will live enthusiasm and oversight to keep this happily and gloriously in the minds huge project on track. of everyone who saw it, on television or in person. Our thanks also go to all the companies, big and small, in every The Paralympic Games got the corner of the UK, who worked with official stamp of approval as the us, their staff, including 46,000-plus greatest ever, challenging and men and women on the Olympic changing attitudes forever. We Park, their unions, and, above all, rejoiced in the achievements of a our Delivery Partner, CLM. All these whole squad of new sporting heroes. companies must benefit from their And even the sun shone. role in the success of London 2012. I am delighted that hundreds now For the Olympic Delivery Authority, enjoy greater freedom to highlight it all came together – not just for their part in this unique achievement, us, but for so many thousands of thanks to a landmark agreement spectators who filled the venues between the Government and the we built and maintained, crossed British Olympic Association. the bridges we constructed, enjoyed the parklands we grew, and got to Our appreciation goes to residents their Games on time, thanks to the near the Olympic Park and our other transport strategy we devised and venues for their patience and the system we helped deliver. tolerance – we strived to be good London and the UK neighbours throughout our work. Judging by all the available And, above all, our thanks go to the staged a fantastic evidence, factual and anecdotal, people of the UK whose funding and Olympic Games that the millions who visited and watched support since the bid, culminating in the Games loved what they saw. the glorious summer of 2012, was the will live happily and There are a lot of people who key to what we did and made gloriously in the minds of deserve our gratitude. everything possible. everyone who saw it, on My thanks go to all the operational I am sure the whole nation will television or in person. staff who worked so hard during share our gratitude to the London the Olympics and Paralympics, to Organising Committee (LOCOG) those who planned, designed and for staging an extraordinary global engineered our vision into reality, spectacle, and to the many other and to those behind the scenes, terrific stakeholders that were central and those who remain. In particular, to the success of London 2012, I must express my gratitude to Sir especially the Department for David Higgins, our first Chief Culture, Media and Sport, other Executive, and Dennis Hone, who government departments, the took over from him in 2011 and is Greater London Authority, Transport now at the helm at the London for London, and the host boroughs. Legacy Development Corporation It certainly was a happy and glorious as it works to ensure lasting benefits summer. from the Games. Amidst the pleasure, there is sorrow that John Hopkins, who had the vision for the open spaces in the Olympic Park that would delight so many, passed away in January and so did not live to see the flowers and plants bloom again in the spring of 2013. The parklands will be his enduring legacy. Sir John Armitt Chairman My personal thanks go to the men Olympic Delivery Authority and women who have sat with me 4 Olympic Delivery Authority Annual Report and Accounts 2012–13 Chief Operating Officer’s The Games are over but our work in this Annual Report. But our work is not yet done. continued with barely a pause once report the athletes had headed for home. The Olympic Delivery Authority will remain in existence into 2014 We moved back into the Olympic to complete the transformation of the Village to start work there, continued Olympic and Paralympic Village into closing out more than £6 billion of East Village, with 2,818 homes commercial contracts, and removed welcoming new occupants – not temporary facilities and handed land athletes this time, but London families back to its owners. blazing a trail in this exciting new neighbourhood in our capital city. Our values and our priorities have not changed. We are determined Gone will be the temporary that our guard will not drop when partitions and fittings that were it comes to the health and safety of installed to make room for 23,000 our workforce, and that our positive athletes and officials last summer. record in health and safety will be We are fitting brand-new kitchens, preserved. carpets and new finishes to the flooring, ready for first residents Public money must be spent wisely to arrive from late summer. and transparently. The ODA was honoured last year to receive a They will see work continuing on the special award from the House of other plots in East Village, which will Commons Public Accounts Committee be occupied in the months ahead, for what it described as “outstanding and a hive of activity around the service delivery and value for Our values and our Chobham Academy, a school for money”. 1,800 children and young people, priorities have not the Sir Ludwig Guttmann Health and In keeping with our reduced role, changed. Public money Wellbeing Centre, and a nursery and our staffing is now a fraction of what pharmacy. These will all be opening it was at the peak of construction. must be spent wisely their doors for the first time this We have supported staff leaving the and transparently. summer – a sign of the ODA’s organisation with a career transition commitment to building not just new programme and will continue with sports venues and the Olympic Park, this throughout the next year. My but a whole new community with all thanks go to all our staff, past and the supporting infrastructure you present, including of course Dennis would expect. This is the living proof Hone, our former Chief Executive. of the legacy of London 2012. Our role now is to finish the Village We completed the last major venue and hand it over to its legacy owners, for the Olympic and Paralympic prepare to close down the Games in the summer of 2011, and organisation in 2014 and transfer our the Olympic Village for its Games- responsibilities to successor bodies time role early in 2012, so the and the Government. But this is more ODA’s initial task in 2012–13 was a than just a matter of dry legal very different one: working with our formalities. Information and records colleagues at LOCOG to prepare have to be handed over and the and maintain the Olympic Park, paperwork done, but our legacy has finalising plans, in particular to be much more than this, the alongside Transport for London, to memory of how the Olympic Park carry thousands of spectators, and was built and our job done. We are implementing rules passed by proud to be continuing – for just a Parliament to regulate advertising little while longer – to build a legacy and trading during the Games. from London 2012. Everything culminated in those magical weeks in July, August and September 2012, and you will read much more about the venues we built and our role during the Games later Gerry Murphy Chief Operating Officer Olympic Delivery Authority Olympic Delivery Authority Annual Report and Accounts 2012–13 5 Financial Review Funding available to the ODA The budget for the Games, announced in March 2007 by the Minister for the 2012–13 Olympics, was £9,325 million, within which the total funding available to the ODA was £8,099 million.
Recommended publications

  • London 2012 Venues Guide

    Olympic Delivery Authority London 2012 venues factfi le July 2012 Venuesguide Contents Introduction 05 Permanent non-competition Horse Guards Parade 58 Setting new standards 84 facilities 32 Hyde Park 59 Accessibility 86 Olympic Park venues 06 Art in the Park 34 Lord’s Cricket Ground 60 Diversity 87 Olympic Park 08 Connections 36 The Mall 61 Businesses 88 Olympic Park by numbers 10 Energy Centre 38 North Greenwich Arena 62 Funding 90 Olympic Park map 12 Legacy 92 International Broadcast The Royal Artillery Aquatics Centre 14 Centre/Main Press Centre Barracks 63 Sustainability 94 (IBC/MPC) Complex 40 Basketball Arena 16 Wembley Arena 64 Workforce 96 BMX Track 18 Olympic and Wembley Stadium 65 Venue contractors 98 Copper Box 20 Paralympic Village 42 Wimbledon 66 Eton Manor 22 Parklands 44 Media contacts 103 Olympic Stadium 24 Primary Substation 46 Out of London venues 68 Riverbank Arena 26 Pumping Station 47 Map of out of Velodrome 28 Transport 48 London venues 70 Water Polo Arena 30 Box Hill 72 London venues 50 Brands Hatch 73 Map of London venues 52 Eton Dorney 74 Earls Court 54 Regional Football stadia 76 ExCeL 55 Hadleigh Farm 78 Greenwich Park 56 Lee Valley White Hampton Court Palace 57 Water Centre 80 Weymouth and Portland 82 2 3 Introduction Everyone seems to have their Londoners or fi rst-time favourite bit of London – visitors – to the Olympic whether that is a place they Park, the centrepiece of a know well or a centuries-old transformed corner of our building they have only ever capital. Built on sporting seen on television.
  • Summer Olympic Games Offical Report London 2012

    Summer Olympic Games Offical Report London 2012

    The London Organising Committee of the Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Limited London 2012 London 2012 Olympic Games Official Report Volume 3 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 SECTION 1: BUILDING A WORLD-CLASS ORGANISATION 13 Introduction 14 Governance, structure and legal support 15 Finance 16 Building the team 18 Workforce Planning and Operations 19 Games Maker volunteers 20 Diversity and inclusion 23 Embedding sustainability 25 Commercial 28 − Procurement 28 − Commercial negotiations and the domestic partner programme 29 − Licensing and retail 30 − Ticketing 31 Brand management and protection 34 SECTION 2: STAGING A GREAT GAMES 35 Introduction 36 Venues 40 − Venue Planning 41 − Venue Development 42 Sport 44 − Sport Competition 44 − Sport Presentation 46 − NOC Services 47 Anti-Doping 48 Medical Services 49 Villages 50 Look 53 Motto 54 Spectator experience 56 Event Services 57 Technology 58 Broadcast 61 Press Operations 62 Games Services 65 − Arrivals and Departures 65 − Accommodation 65 − Logistics 66 − Catering, Cleaning and Waste 67 Health and Safety 68 International Relations 69 Readiness 70 Test events 71 The London Organising Committee of the Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Limited 2 SECTION 3: EVERYONE’s GamES 74 Introduction 75 Communications 78 − Public Relations and Media 80 − Government Relations 81 − Community Relations 82 − Editorial Services 83 − Web and New Media 84 Brand and Marketing 86 − Games emblems 86 − Research and relationships 87 − Mascots 88 Nations and Regions 89 Inspire 90 Education 91 Ceremonies 93 Olympic
  • SELECT COMMITTEE on OLYMPIC and PARALYMPIC LEGACY Oral and Written Evidence

    SELECT COMMITTEE on OLYMPIC and PARALYMPIC LEGACY Oral and Written Evidence

    SELECT COMMITTEE ON OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC LEGACY Oral and written evidence Contents Active in Time Ltd—Written evidence ................................................................................................. 3 Association for Physical Education (afPE)—Written evidence ......................................................... 8 Big Lottery Fund—Written evidence .................................................................................................. 16 BioRegional—Written evidence ........................................................................................................... 21 Boff, Andrew—Written evidence ........................................................................................................ 24 Boggis, Emma—Written evidence ........................................................................................................ 35 British Gliding Association (BGA)—Written evidence ................................................................... 49 British Standards Institution (BSI)—Written evidence .................................................................... 51 British Swimming and the Amateur Swimming Association—Written evidence ...................... 55 British Paralympic Association (BPA)—Written evidence ............................................................. 64 Community Safety Social Inclusion Scrutiny Commission—Written evidence ......................... 70 Dorset County Council—Written evidence ....................................................................................
  • The News 9 No

    The News 9 No

    The News 9 No. 9 - AUGUST 2007 SPECIAL EDITION of H S S M G E INVITATION TO HOST THE 15TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON SOIL MECHANICS AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING (2011) IN ATHENS The Hellenic Society for Soil Mechanics & Geotechnical En- gineering (HSSMGE) has submitted an application to host the 15th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geo- technical Engineering in 2011. The Hellenic Society hosted successfully in Athens an Inter- national Symposium on Hard Soils – Soft Rocks, in 1993, in collaboration with the French National Society and the 4th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical En- gineering in Thessaloniki this year. Members of our Society participated also in the organization of two International Conferences of IGS. Furthermore, HSSMGE has organized five national confer- ences on geotechnical & geoenvironmental engineering since 1988 in Athens and other cities of Greece. If there will be a positive response to our application, this will be the first time that a European Conference will be held in Greece. Location The Conference will be held in Athens, Greece. The venue will be the complex of the Athens Concert Hall (Megaron Moussikis) which comprises: ¾ Two theatre – style halls for 1,500 – 1,800 persons respec- continue in page 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Invitation to host the 15th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (2011) in Athens 1 PAPERS Interaction between stractural and geotechnical engineer, J. B. Burland 3 Greece’s Egnatia Highway Tunnels, E. Hoek, P. Marinos, N. Kazilis, G. Angistalis, N. Rahaniotis and V. Marinos 16 Mechanical behavior of a fine-grained soil reinforced with geotextiles, A.
  • 1 Ossified Collections Embody the Manifold Reasons Motivating Private Collectors

    1 Ossified Collections Embody the Manifold Reasons Motivating Private Collectors

    Ossified Collections: The Past Encapsulated in British Institutions Today Karen Attar Chapter published in: Collecting the Past: British Collectors and their Collections from the 18th to the 20th Centuries, ed. by Toby Burrows and Cynthia Johnston (London: Routledge, 2019), pp. 113-38 ‘Floreat bibliomania’, entitled that great collector A.N.L. Munby an article published in the New Statesman on 21 June 1952.1 Munby’s main interest was in sale catalogues as records of books assembled and then dispersed.2 This essay provides an overview of a more philanthropic and stable end to collecting: collections of primarily printed books in the British Isles that have stayed together and now enrich institutions, causing broader swathes of scholars and librarians to echo Munby’s prayer. Whilst some outstanding collectors and bibliophiles are highlighted in the standard literature of collecting and other more modest ones are noted in magisterial histories of institutions, feature in dedicated articles, or are commemorated in published catalogues of their collections, these remain the minority.3 This overview is based more widely on some of what has been described as ‘the rest of the iceberg’, through a survey of 873 repositories in the British Isles: national, academic, school, public, subscription and professional libraries, or in trusts, cathedrals, churches, monasteries, London clubs, archives, museums, schools, companies, and stately homes.4 Discussing popular collecting subjects and trends in collecting, it concentrates on ‘collections’ as groups of books with some unifying element, most of which originated with an individual before entering corporate ownership, whilst retaining at least some semblance of their former identity.
  • Planning for a Sustainable Future

    Planning for a Sustainable Future

    SPORT ADVISORY SERVICES Planning for a Sustainable Future The legacy of sporting venues following major events kpmg.com Cover photo: Péter Szalmás Planning for a Sustainable Future 3 Contents 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 6 2. Appraising recent events ...................................................................................................................8 3. The growing importance of legacy for the International Olympic Committee ���������������������������������11 4. Formulating the most appropriate venue legacy plan – factors and challenges at play ..................12 5. Creative solutions at London 2012 .................................................................................................16 6. The International Swimming Federation (FINA) is taking the initiative �������������������������������������������� 17 7. The case for temporary venues – technical and financial considerations ....................................... 18 8. Emerging themes and conclusion ...................................................................................................22 © 2015 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties,
  • XIX. Széchy Károly Memorial Lecture

    XIX. Széchy Károly Memorial Lecture

    XIX. Széchy Károly Memorial Lecture INTERACTION BETWEEN STRUCTURAL AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS John Burland Imperial College London The booklet is published by Hungarian National Committee of the International Committee on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (ISSMGE) (Hungarian Association of Geotechnics) 1111 Budapest, Műegyetem rkp. 3. Kmf 10. March of 2013 Edited by : József Mecsi Responsible for publication: Dr. Mecsi József Press: Kontraszt Plusz Kft, Pécs Issued in 100 copies The authors of the articles are entitled to full copyright Participants ont the Memorial Lecture CONTENT Evening meeting –IstructE/ICE annual joint meeting held on 26 April 2006 at ICE, One Great George Street, London SW1’ Interaction between structural and geotechnical engineers Based on a paper published in The Structural Engineer 18 April 2006 John Burland 4-28 Interaction between structural and geotechnical engineers John Burland presentation on the XIX. Széchy Károly Memorial Lecture Synopsis 29 Curriculum vitae of Professor John Burland 29 Interview. Questioner: József Mecsi, Respondent: John Burland First published in „Mérnökújság February 2013.” 30-31 John Burland presentation on the XIX. Széchy Károly Memorial Lecture Budapest, 15th March 2013 Great Hall of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (Budapest V. Széchényi square 9., II. floor) 32-52 Personal reflections on the teaching of soil mechanics J.B.Burland First published in 53-72 Interaction between structural and geotechnical engineers John Burland, CBE DSc(Eng), FREng, FRS, FIStructE, FICE, FCGI Synopsis There are many situations for which interaction between structure and ground has to be considered. This involves important interactions between specialist structural and geotechnical engineers. During his career the author has encountered profound differences in approach between structural and geotechnical engineers often leading to a lack of understanding and difficulties in communication.
  • LONDON 2012 a DECADE in the MAKING PRESS PACK Bid Masterplan Venues

    LONDON 2012 a DECADE in the MAKING PRESS PACK Bid Masterplan Venues

    LONDON 2012 A DECADE IN THE MAKING PRESS PACK BID MASTERPlan VENUES BRAND OVERlaY LegacY actiVation LONDON 2012 A DECADE IN THE MAKING PRESS PACK BID Populous has been involved in 10 Olympic Games and were the bid architects for 3 consecutive host city awards for the cities of London 2012, Glasgow 2014 and Sochi 2014. Our unique experience allows us to identify and optimise the use of the city and surrounding areas to create compelling and compact venue distribution plans for potential host cities. With our in-depth analysis, we work alongside bidding cities to provide a comprehensive proposal to organise the Games that will appeal to the IOC and other major competition committees. Since 2003's initial site exploration, Populous assisted the London 2012 bid team with in house architects who created the bid winning London wide sports masterplan. MASTERPLAN Our process of masterplanning begins with a long term legacy strategy as the starting point for creating vibrant and sustainable places within cities. We use sporting and entertainment venues as urban catalysts and develop the relationship between social infrastructure elements, and enhance them to add value and character to the urban realm. For the London 2012 Olympic Park our design approach was imbedded in our masterplanning, ensuring that the personal experiences of all Games time and legacy user groups were considered from their respective mode of transport to their seat within the venue. VENUES With more than a 1,000 projects completed globally, we open locations to the world – creating iconic venues that become a financial success. Our portfolio includes the design of 3 Olympic stadiums - Sydney 2000, Sochi 2014 and the London 2012 Olympic Stadium, which has already become the centre piece of the park and a catalyst for the urban regeneration of East London.
  • Adaptive Athletes LEVELED BOOK • Z a Reading A–Z Level Z1 Leveled Book Word Count: 1,910 Adaptive Athletes

    Adaptive Athletes LEVELED BOOK • Z a Reading A–Z Level Z1 Leveled Book Word Count: 1,910 Adaptive Athletes

    1 Adaptive Athletes LEVELED BOOK • Z A Reading A–Z Level Z1 Leveled Book Word Count: 1,910 Adaptive Athletes Connections Writing Research a sport that is included in both the Paralympics and Olympics. Write a paragraph comparing and contrasting how athletes in both compete. Social Studies Using a world map, indicate the locations of the Olympics and Paralympics since 1980. Label the map with each city and year. 2 1 •Z Z•Z Written by David Dreier Visit www.readinga-z.com www.readinga-z.com for thousands of books and materials. Words to Know Adaptive ability paralyzed adaptive paraplegia Athletes amputated prestigious competitive rehabilitate disability striving mobility venues Photo Credits: Front cover: © Mark Ralston/AFP/Getty Images; title page: © Ng Han Guan/ AP Images; page 3 (main): © Xinhua/Landov; page 3 (inset): © Geoff Caddick/ PA/AP Images; page 4: © Rolf Vennenbernd/picture-alliance/dpa/AP Images; pages 5, 6: © TopFoto/The Image Works; page 8: © Katsumi Kasahara/AP Images; page 9: © REUTERS/LOCOG; page 10 (left): © Han Chuanhao/Xinhua/ Landov; page 10 (right): © Eugene Hoshiko/AP Images; page 11 (left): © REUTERS/ Claro Cortes IV; page 11 (right): © REUTERS/Grace Liang; pages 12, 13: © Dmitry Lovetsky/AP Images; page 15 (left): © Lin Yiguang/Xinhua/Landov; page 15 (right): © Bob Daemmrich/The Image Works; page 16: © Wang Lei/Xinhua/ Landov; page 17: © Heathcliff O’Malley/Rex Features/AP Images; page 18: © Paul Sakuma/AP Images; page 19: © PA Photos/Landov Front cover: Basketball teams from Brazil and Australia face off at the 2008 Paralympic Games in Beijing, China. Title page: China’s Hu Daoliang (left) fences with the United States’ Scott Rodgers during a match at the 2008 Paralympic Games.
  • SCOSS Review 2000-01

    SCOSS Review 2000-01

    Structural Safety 2000-01 Thirteenth Report of SCOSS The Standing Committee on Structural Safety May 2001 SCOSS 11 Upper Belgrave Street London SW1X 8BH CLASSIFICATION Availability: Unrestricted Content: Review Status: Committee-guided User: Civil and structural engineering professionals and organisations ISBN 0 901297 16 X Published by The Institution of Structural Engineers 11 Upper Belgrave Street, London SW1X 8BH, United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0)20 7235 4535 Fax: +44 (0)20 7235 4294 © The Standing Committee on Structural Safety The Standing Committee on Structural Safety, its officers and the members who have served on the Committee that produced this report have endeavoured to ensure the accuracy of the facts reported. No liability for negligence or otherwise in relation to the report and its content or interpretation by others is accepted by the Committee, its members, officers or agents. In particular, the opinions and recommendations expressed in the report are intended as general statements having relevance to structural safety and should not be taken as referring to any particular proprietary product or technology. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior permission of SCOSS, 11 Upper Belgrave Street, London SW1X 8BH. 2 SCOSS Thirteenth Report CONTENTS Foreword 5 Summary 7 1 Introduction 1.1 General………………………………………………………………………………………………... 11 1.2 References…………………………………………………………………………………………….. 12 2 The control of risks to structural safety 2.1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………… 13 2.2 The human contribution to structural failures………………………………………………………… 13 2.3 Codes and standards………………………………………………………………………………….. 14 2.4 Competence and integrity…………………………………………………………………………….
  • Llyfrgell Genedlaethol Cymru = the National Library of Wales Cymorth

    Llyfrgell Genedlaethol Cymru = the National Library of Wales Cymorth

    Llyfrgell Genedlaethol Cymru = The National Library of Wales Cymorth chwilio | Finding Aid - Maxwell Fraser Papers, (GB 0210 MAXSER) Cynhyrchir gan Access to Memory (AtoM) 2.3.0 Generated by Access to Memory (AtoM) 2.3.0 Argraffwyd: Mai 03, 2017 Printed: May 03, 2017 Wrth lunio'r disgrifiad hwn dilynwyd canllawiau ANW a seiliwyd ar ISAD(G) Ail Argraffiad; rheolau AACR2; ac LCSH Description follows ANW guidelines based on ISAD(G) 2nd ed.;AACR2; and LCSH https://archifau.llyfrgell.cymru/index.php/maxwell-fraser-papers-2 archives.library .wales/index.php/maxwell-fraser-papers-2 Llyfrgell Genedlaethol Cymru = The National Library of Wales Allt Penglais Aberystwyth Ceredigion United Kingdom SY23 3BU 01970 632 800 01970 615 709 [email protected] www.llgc.org.uk Maxwell Fraser Papers, Tabl cynnwys | Table of contents Gwybodaeth grynodeb | Summary information .............................................................................................. 3 Hanes gweinyddol / Braslun bywgraffyddol | Administrative history | Biographical sketch ......................... 3 Natur a chynnwys | Scope and content .......................................................................................................... 4 Trefniant | Arrangement .................................................................................................................................. 4 Nodiadau | Notes ............................................................................................................................................. 4 Pwyntiau mynediad |
  • ICE's Advice on Ethical Conduct

    ICE's Advice on Ethical Conduct

    ADVICE ON ETHICAL CONDUCT Made by the Council on 21 July 2004, to come into effect on 1 November 2004. Modified by the Council on 17 July 2012. Introduction The purpose of the ‘Advice on Ethical Conduct’ is to give members further advice and information about particular areas of professional practice that the Institution would like its members to follow in order to behave ethically. In most instances, a member’s failure to adhere to the guidance is unlikely, of itself, to constitute a breach of the Rules of Professional Conduct. The advice covers those matters which members should consider and take into account rather than simply those things which, if disregarded, would be likely to attract censure. The exceptions to this are the additional advice regarding the prevention of bribery and corruption, and the advice on equality and diversity. Any form of involvement in bribery and corruption would be likely to breach Rule 1 of the Rules of Professional Conduct, as well as the law in the UK and many other countries. Similarly, any breaches of the UK law governing equality and diversity would be likely to breach Rule 1 of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Sustainability and the Environment Members should promote the use of recycled or reusable materials wherever practicable and should make use of energy-efficient techniques in the construction and life maintenance of projects. Members should, as far as practicable, use their influence to minimise the production of waste and should maximise environment-friendly reuse, recycling or disposal. Members should minimise the impact on the natural and non-built environment, e.g.