Oceanic Bromoform Emissions Weighted by Their Ozone Depletion Potential

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Oceanic Bromoform Emissions Weighted by Their Ozone Depletion Potential Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 13647–13663, 2015 www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/13647/2015/ doi:10.5194/acp-15-13647-2015 © Author(s) 2015. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Oceanic bromoform emissions weighted by their ozone depletion potential S. Tegtmeier1, F. Ziska1, I. Pisso2, B. Quack1, G. J. M. Velders3, X. Yang4, and K. Krüger5 1GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany 2Norwegian Institute for Air Research (NILU), Kjeller, Norway 3National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands 4British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, UK 5University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway Correspondence to: S. Tegtmeier ([email protected]) Received: 12 March 2015 – Published in Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.: 26 May 2015 Revised: 17 November 2015 – Accepted: 27 November 2015 – Published: 10 December 2015 Abstract. At present, anthropogenic halogens and oceanic in a future climate. However, at the same time, it is reduced emissions of very short-lived substances (VSLSs) both con- by less effective bromine-related ozone depletion due to de- tribute to the observed stratospheric ozone depletion. Emis- clining stratospheric chlorine concentrations. The compari- sions of the long-lived anthropogenic halogens have been son of the ODP-weighted emissions of short- and long-lived reduced and are currently declining, whereas emissions of halocarbons provides a new concept for assessing the over- the biogenic VSLSs are expected to increase in future cli- all impact of oceanic halocarbon emissions on stratospheric mate due to anthropogenic activities affecting oceanic pro- ozone depletion for current conditions and future projections. duction and emissions. Here, we introduce a new approach for assessing the impact of oceanic halocarbons on strato- spheric ozone by calculating their ozone depletion poten- tial (ODP)-weighted emissions. Seasonally and spatially de- 1 Introduction pendent, global distributions are derived within a case-study framework for CHBr3 for the period 1999–2006. At present, The overall abundance of ozone-depleting substances in the ODP-weighted emissions of CHBr3 amount up to 50 % of atmosphere has been decreasing since the beginning of the ODP-weighted anthropogenic emissions of CFC-11 and to 21st century as a result of the successful implementation of 9 % of all long-lived ozone depleting halogens. The ODP- the 1987 Montreal Protocol and its later adjustments and weighted emissions are large where strong oceanic emissions amendments (Carpenter and Reimann, 2014). In contrast coincide with high-reaching convective activity and show to the long-lived halocarbons, the halogenated very short- pronounced peaks at the Equator and the coasts with largest lived substances (VSLSs) with chemical lifetimes of less contributions from the Maritime Continent and western Pa- than 6 months are not controlled by the Montreal Protocol cific Ocean. Variations of tropical convective activity lead to and are even suggested to increase in the future (Hepach seasonal shifts in the spatial distribution of the trajectory- et al., 2014; Hossaini et al., 2015). Brominated VSLSs are derived ODP with the updraught mass flux, used as a proxy known to have large natural sources; however, evidence has for trajectory-derived ODP, explaining 71 % of the variance emerged that their oceanic production and emissions are en- of the ODP distribution. Future climate projections based on hanced through anthropogenic activities which are expected the RCP 8.5 scenario suggest a 31 % increase of the ODP- to increase in the future (Leedham et al., 2013; Ziska et weighted CHBr3 emissions by 2100 compared to present val- al., 2015). At present, oceanic VSLSs provide a significant ues. This increase is related to a larger convective updraught contribution to the stratospheric bromine budget (Carpenter mass flux in the upper troposphere and increasing emissions and Reimann, 2014). In the future, the decline of anthro- pogenic chlorine and bromine will further increase the rel- Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. 13648 S. Tegtmeier et al.: Oceanic bromoform emissions weighted ative impact of oceanic VSLSs on stratospheric chemistry. tensively used measure and plays an important role in the The amount of ozone loss for given bromine emission, how- Montreal Protocol for control metrics and reporting of emis- ever, is expected to decrease due to decreasing stratospheric sions. Some recent studies have applied the ODP concept to chlorine concentrations and thus a less efficient BrO = ClO VSLSs (e.g., Brioude et al., 2010; Pisso et al., 2010), which ozone loss cycle (Yang et al., 2014). Furthermore, the im- have also natural sources. Depending on the meteorological pacts of climate change on surface emissions, troposphere- conditions, only a fraction of the originally released VSLSs to-stratosphere transport, stratospheric chemistry and resi- reaches the stratosphere. As a consequence, the ODP of a dence time will change the role of VSLSs (Pyle et al., 2007; VSLS is not one number as for the long-lived halocarbons Hossaini et al., 2012). While stratospheric ozone depletion but needs to be quantified as a function of time and location due to long-lived halocarbons is expected to level off and re- of emission. ODPs of VSLSs have been estimated based on verse (Austin and Butchart, 2003), assessing oceanic VSLSs Eulerian (Wuebbles et al., 2001) and Lagrangian (Brioude and their impact on stratospheric ozone in a future changing et al., 2010; Pisso et al., 2010) studies, showing strong ge- climate remains a challenge. ographical and seasonal variations, in particular within the Over the last years, there has been increasing evidence tropics. The studies demonstrated that the ODPs of VSLSs from observational (e.g., Dorf et al., 2006; Sioris et al., are to a large degree determined by the efficiency of vertical 2006) and modeling (e.g., Warwick et al., 2006; Liang et transport from the surface to the stratosphere and that uncer- al., 2010; Tegtmeier et al., 2012) studies that VSLSs pro- tainties in the ODPs arise mainly from uncertainties associ- vide a significant contribution to stratospheric total bromine ated with the representation of convection. (Bry/. The current best-estimate range of 2–8 ppt (Carpen- Combining the emission strength and the ozone- ter and Reimann, 2014) includes observation-derived esti- destroying capabilities of a substance in a meaningful way mates of 2.9 ppt (Sala et al., 2014) and model-derived esti- can be achieved by calculating the ODP-weighted emissions. mates of 4 ppt (Hossaini et al., 2013), 4.5–6 ppt (Aschmann For the long-lived halocarbons, global ODP-weighted emis- and Sinnhuber, 2013) and 7.7 ppt (Liang et al., 2014). Bromi- sions can be calculated as the product of two numbers, their nated VSLSs reduce ozone in the lower stratosphere with mean global emissions and their ODPs (e.g., Velders et al., current estimates of a 3–11 % contribution to ozone depletion 2007; Ravishankara et al., 2009). For the VSLSs, however, (Hossaini et al., 2015) or a 2–10 % contribution (Braesicke et the concept of ODP-weighted emissions has not yet been ap- al., 2013; Yang et al., 2014). Through the relatively large im- plied. To do so requires combining estimates of the emis- pact of VSLSs on ozone in the lower stratosphere, VSLSs sions with the ODPs, both of which are highly variable in contribute −0.02 W m−2 to global radiative forcing (Hos- space and time. Among the brominated VSLSs, the calcu- −2 saini et al., 2015) (∼ 6 % of the 0.33 W m from all halo- lation of CHBr3 ODP-weighted emissions is now possible, carbons of ozone-depleting substances). since global emission inventories (Ziska et al., 2013) and The most abundant bromine-containing VSLSs are dibro- global ODP maps (Pisso et al., 2010) has become available. momethane (CH2Br2/ and bromoform (CHBr3/ with poten- ODP-weighted emissions provide insight in where and when tially important source regions in tropical, subtropical and CHBr3 is emitted that impacts stratospheric ozone. Further- shelf waters (Quack et al., 2007). The contribution of VSLSs more, in a globally averaged framework, the ODP-weighted to stratospheric bromine in form of organic source gases or emissions allow comparisons of the impact of past, present inorganic product gases depends strongly on the efficiency and future long- and short-lived halocarbon emissions. The of troposphere-to-stratosphere transport relative to the pho- ODP-weighted emissions for the anthropogenic component tochemical loss of the source gases and to the wet deposi- of the CHBr3 emission budget cannot be calculated, since no tion of the product gases. Uncertainties in the contribution of reliable estimates of anthropogenic contributions are avail- VSLSs to stratospheric halogen loading mainly result from able at the moment. The concept is introduced here for the uncertainties in the emission inventories (e.g., Hossaini et al., available total emission inventory. 2013) and from uncertainties in the modeled transport and We compile ODP-weighted emissions of CHBr3 in form wet deposition processes (e.g., Schofield et al., 2011). of the seasonal and annual mean distribution in order to The relative contribution of individual halocarbons to assess the overall impact of oceanic CHBr3 emissions on stratospheric ozone depletion is often quantified by the ozone stratospheric ozone. First, we introduce the new approach depletion potential (ODP) defined as the time-integrated of calculating ODP-weighted VSLS emissions,
Recommended publications
  • Climate Change and Human Health: Risks and Responses
    Climate change and human health RISKS AND RESPONSES Editors A.J. McMichael The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia D.H. Campbell-Lendrum London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom C.F. Corvalán World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland K.L. Ebi World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, European Centre for Environment and Health, Rome, Italy A.K. Githeko Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya J.D. Scheraga US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA A. Woodward University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION GENEVA 2003 WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Climate change and human health : risks and responses / editors : A. J. McMichael . [et al.] 1.Climate 2.Greenhouse effect 3.Natural disasters 4.Disease transmission 5.Ultraviolet rays—adverse effects 6.Risk assessment I.McMichael, Anthony J. ISBN 92 4 156248 X (NLM classification: WA 30) ©World Health Organization 2003 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization can be obtained from Marketing and Dis- semination, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel: +41 22 791 2476; fax: +41 22 791 4857; email: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications—whether for sale or for noncommercial distribution—should be addressed to Publications, at the above address (fax: +41 22 791 4806; email: [email protected]). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Environmental Issues and Its Remedies
    International Journal of Sustainable Energy and Environment Vol. 1, No. 8, September 2013, PP: 120 - 126, ISSN: 2327- 0330 (Online) Available online at www.ijsee.com Research article Global Environmental Issues and its Remedies Dr. MD. Zulfequar Ahmad Khan* Address Present. Permanent Address for Correspondence *Dr. Md Zulfequar Ahmad Khan 21-B, Lane No 3, Associate Professor Jamia Nagar, Zakir Nagar, Department of Geography & Environmental Studies New Delhi-110025 Arba Minch University INDIA Arba Minch, Ethiopia. Mobile No.: +919718502867 Mobile No: +251 923934234 E-mail: [email protected] _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Abstract To the surprise of many out-spoken environmentalists, it, in fact, turns out mankind and technology actually aren’t the only significant causes of global environmental problems. However, before we start to get too comfortable and confidently assume that we as human beings are officially “off the hook,” the fact remains that several “man-made” causes play a significant role in our current, global problems trend. Many human actions affect what people value. One way in which the actions that cause global change are different from most of these is that the effects take decades to centuries to be realized. This fact causes many concerned people to consider taking action now to protect the values of those who might be affected by global environmental change in years to come. But because of uncertainty about how global environmental systems work, and because the people affected will probably live in circumstances very much different from those of today and may have different values, it is hard to know how present-day actions will affect them.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 Ozone and Climate
    1 Ozone and Climate: A Review of Interconnections Coordinating Lead Authors John Pyle (UK), Theodore Shepherd (Canada) Lead Authors Gregory Bodeker (New Zealand), Pablo Canziani (Argentina), Martin Dameris (Germany), Piers Forster (UK), Aleksandr Gruzdev (Russia), Rolf Müller (Germany), Nzioka John Muthama (Kenya), Giovanni Pitari (Italy), William Randel (USA) Contributing Authors Vitali Fioletov (Canada), Jens-Uwe Grooß (Germany), Stephen Montzka (USA), Paul Newman (USA), Larry Thomason (USA), Guus Velders (The Netherlands) Review Editors Mack McFarland (USA) IPCC Boek (dik).indb 83 15-08-2005 10:52:13 84 IPCC/TEAP Special Report: Safeguarding the Ozone Layer and the Global Climate System Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 85 1.4 Past and future stratospheric ozone changes (attribution and prediction) 110 1.1 Introduction 87 1.4.1 Current understanding of past ozone 1.1.1 Purpose and scope of this chapter 87 changes 110 1.1.2 Ozone in the atmosphere and its role in 1.4.2 The Montreal Protocol, future ozone climate 87 changes and their links to climate 117 1.1.3 Chapter outline 93 1.5 Climate change from ODSs, their substitutes 1.2 Observed changes in the stratosphere 93 and ozone depletion 120 1.2.1 Observed changes in stratospheric ozone 93 1.5.1 Radiative forcing and climate sensitivity 120 1.2.2 Observed changes in ODSs 96 1.5.2 Direct radiative forcing of ODSs and their 1.2.3 Observed changes in stratospheric aerosols, substitutes 121 water vapour, methane and nitrous oxide 96 1.5.3 Indirect radiative forcing of ODSs 123 1.2.4 Observed temperature
    [Show full text]
  • Slow-Onset Processes and Resulting Loss and Damage
    Publication Series ADDRESSING LOSS AND DAMAGE FROM SLOW-ONSET PROCESSES Slow-onset Processes and Resulting Loss and Damage – An introduction Table of contents L 4 22 ist of a bbre Summary of Loss and damage via tio key facts and due to slow-onset ns definitions processes AR4 IPCC Fourth Assessment Report 6 22 What is loss and damage? Introduction AR5 IPCC Fifth Assessment Report COP Conference of the Parties to the 23 United Nations Framework Convention on 9 What losses and damages IMPRINT Climate Change can result from slow-onset Slow-onset ENDA Environment Development Action Energy, processes? Authors Environment and Development Programme processes and their Laura Schäfer, Pia Jorks, Emmanuel Seck, Energy key characteristics 26 Oumou Koulibaly, Aliou Diouf ESL Extreme Sea Level What losses and damages Contributors GDP Gross Domestic Product 9 can result from sea level rise? Idy Niang, Bounama Dieye, Omar Sow, Vera GMSL Global mean sea level What is a slow-onset process? Künzel, Rixa Schwarz, Erin Roberts, Roxana 31 Baldrich, Nathalie Koffi Nguessan GMSLR Global mean sea level rise 10 IOM International Organization on Migration What are key characteristics Loss and damage Editing Adam Goulston – Scize Group LLC of slow-onset processes? in Senegal due to IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change sea level rise Layout and graphics LECZ Low-elevation coastal zone 14 Karin Roth – Wissen in Worten OCHA Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs What are other relevant January 2021 terms for the terminology on 35 RCP Representative
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Effects of Ozone Depletion and Its Interactions with Climate Change: 2010 Assessment
    University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Science - Papers (Archive) Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health 2010 Environmental Effects of Ozone Depletion and its Interactions with Climate Change: 2010 Assessment Sharon A. Robinson University of Wollongong, [email protected] Stephen R. Wilson University of Wollongong, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/scipapers Part of the Life Sciences Commons, Physical Sciences and Mathematics Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Robinson, Sharon A. and Wilson, Stephen R.: Environmental Effects of Ozone Depletion and its Interactions with Climate Change: 2010 Assessment 2010. https://ro.uow.edu.au/scipapers/456 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Environmental Effects of Ozone Depletion and its Interactions with Climate Change: 2010 Assessment Abstract This quadrennial Assessment was prepared by the Environmental Effects Assessment Panel (EEAP) for the Parties to the Montreal Protocol. The Assessment reports on key findings on environment and health since the last full Assessment of 2006, paying attention to the interactions between ozone depletion and climate change. Simultaneous publication of the Assessment in the scientific literature aims to inform the scientific community how their data, modeling and interpretations are playing a role in information dissemination to the Parties
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean Acidification in Washington State
    University of Washington • Washington Sea Grant Ocean Acidification in Washington State What is Ocean Acidification? OA in Washington State cean Acidification (or ‘OA’) is a long-term decrease ur region is experiencing ocean acidification sooner Oin seawater pH that is primarily caused by the Oand more severely than expected, due to a combina- ocean’s uptake of carbon dioxide (CO2 ) from the atmo- tion of human and natural causes. In the spring and sum- sphere. CO2 generated by humans’ use of fossil fuels and mer, acidification along our coast is compounded by up- deforestation has been accumulating in the atmosphere welling, which mixes deep, naturally low-pH seawater into since the industrial revolution. About one quarter of this the already acidified surface layer. In Puget Sound, nutri- CO2 is absorbed by the oceans, pH describes the acidity of a liquid ents generated by human activities (mostly where it reacts with water to form nitrogen and phosphorus from sewage, carbonic acid. As a result, the aver- fertilizers and manure) fuel processes that age pH of seawater at the ocean add even more CO2 to this ‘doubly-acidified’ surface has already dropped by ~0.1 seawater. The combination can be deadly units, a 30% increase in acidity. If to vulnerable organisms. pH levels as low atmospheric CO2 levels continue as 7.4 have been recorded in Hood Canal, to climb at the present rate, ocean an important shellfish-growing region. acidity will double by the end of this State and federal agencies, scientists, tribes, century. shellfish growers and NGOs are working together to address OA in our region.
    [Show full text]
  • Effectiveness of Houseplants in Reducing the Indoor Air Pollutant
    as a result of increased input of the Effectiveness of Houseplants in Reducing precursors of ozone into the atmos- the Indoor Air Pollutant Ozone phere (Mustafa, 1990). Automobiles are the principal contributors to sec- ondary tropospheric ozone genera- Heather L. Papinchak1, E. Jay Holcomb2,4, tion (Maroni et al., 1995). Teodora Orendovici Best3, and Dennis R. Decoteau2 Ozone as an indoor air pollutant can be prevalent in homes and offices due to infiltration of outdoor ambient ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. mitigation, depletion rates, foliage air indoors (Weschler, 2000). Ozone- emitting equipment such as copy UMMARY Sansevieria trifasciata S . Three common indoor houseplants, snake plant ( ), machines, laser printers, ultraviolet spider plant (Chlorophytum comosum), and golden pothos (Epipremnum aureum), were evaluated for their species effectiveness in reducing ozone concentrations in a lighting, and some electrostatic air simulated indoor environment. Continuously stirred tank reactor (CSTR) chambers purification systems may also contrib- housed within a greenhouse equipped with a charcoal filtration air supply system ute to indoor ozone levels (Maroni were used to simulate an indoor environment in which ozone concentrations could et al., 1995; Weschler, 2000). Ozone be measured and regulated. Ozone was injected into the chambers and when generation from appliances such as concentrations reached 200 ± 5 ppb, the ozone-generating system was turned off photocopiers on average yield 5.2 and ozone concentrations over time (ozone was monitored every 5–6 min in each mgÁh–1 and laser printers on average chamber) were recorded until about <5 ppb were measured in the treatment produce 1.2 mgÁh–1; however, con- chamber. On average, ozone depletion time (time from when the ozone generating centrations could vary based on < system was turned off at 200 ppb to 5 ppb in the chamber) ranged from 38 to equipment maintenance (Black and 120 min per evaluation.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean Acidification Due to Increasing Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide
    Ocean acidification due to increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide Policy document 12/05 June 2005 ISBN 0 85403 617 2 This report can be found at www.royalsoc.ac.uk ISBN 0 85403 617 2 © The Royal Society 2005 Requests to reproduce all or part of this document should be submitted to: Science Policy Section The Royal Society 6-9 Carlton House Terrace London SW1Y 5AG email [email protected] Copy edited and typeset by The Clyvedon Press Ltd, Cardiff, UK ii | June 2005 | The Royal Society Ocean acidification due to increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide Ocean acidification due to increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide Contents Page Summary vi 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background to the report 1 1.2 The oceans and carbon dioxide: acidification 1 1.3 Acidification and the surface oceans 2 1.4 Ocean life and acidification 2 1.5 Interaction with the Earth systems 2 1.6 Adaptation to and mitigation of ocean acidification 2 1.7 Artificial deep ocean storage of carbon dioxide 3 1.8 Conduct of the study 3 2 Effects of atmospheric CO2 enhancement on ocean chemistry 5 2.1 Introduction 5 2.2 The impact of increasing CO2 on the chemistry of ocean waters 5 2.2.1 The oceans and the carbon cycle 5 2.2.2 The oceans and carbon dioxide 6 2.2.3 The oceans as a carbonate buffer 6 2.3 Natural variation in pH of the oceans 6 2.4 Factors affecting CO2 uptake by the oceans 7 2.5 How oceans have responded to changes in atmospheric CO2 in the past 7 2.6 Change in ocean chemistry due to increases in atmospheric CO2 from human activities 9 2.6.1 Change to the oceans
    [Show full text]
  • The Arctic Ozone Layer
    The Arctic Ozone Layer How the Arctic Ozone Layer is Responding to Ozone-Depleting Chemicals and Climate Change Photographs are the property of the EC ARQX picture archive. Special permission was obtained from Mike Harwood (p. vii: Muskoxen on Ellesmere Island), Richard Mittermeier (pp. vii, 12: Sunset from the Polar Environment Atmospheric Research Laboratory), Angus Fergusson (p. 4: Iqaluit; p. 8: Baffin Island), Yukio Makino (p. vii: Instrumentation and scientist on top of the Polar Environment Atmospheric Research Laboratory), Tomohiro Nagai (p. 25: Figure 20), and John Bird (p. 30: Polar Environment Atmospheric Research Laboratory). To obtain additional copies of this report, write to: Angus Fergusson Science Assessments Section Science & Technology Integration Division Environment Canada 4905 Dufferin Street Toronto ON M3H 5T4 Canada Please send feedback, comments and suggestions to [email protected] © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of the Environment, 2010. Catalogue No.: En164-18/2010E ISBN: 978-1-100-10787-5 Aussi disponible en français The Arctic Ozone Layer How the Arctic Ozone Layer is Responding to Ozone-Depleting Chemicals and Climate Change by Angus Fergusson Acknowledgements The author wishes to thank David Wardle, Ted Shepherd, Norm McFarlane, Nathan Gillett, John Scinocca, Darrell Piekarz, Ed Hare, Elizabeth Bush, Jacinthe Lacroix and Hans Fast for their valuable advice and assistance during the preparation of this manuscript. i Contents Summary ....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 9. AM Ecocide
    Amendments to draft resolution On the crime of Ecocide № Party Line Action Current Text Proposed Amendment Explanation 1 Bündnis 90/ 1 replace On an international recognition of the Tackle environmental destruction: Die Grünen crime of ecocide: 2 Bündnis 90/ 25 replace that global warming must be limited to agreed to holding the increase in the global Die Grünen 1,5°C. average temperature to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels and pursuing efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels, recognising that this would significantly reduce the risks and impacts of climate change. Amendments on Draft Resolution on an international recognition of the crime of ecocide European Green Party - 5th Congress, Liverpool, UK, 30 March-2 April 2017 1 № Party Line Action Current Text Proposed Amendment Explanation 3 Vihreät - De 30-36 delete According to environmental scientists Not necessary for making the point, Gröna Johan Rockström (Stockholm Resilience the chapter draws the attention Centre) and Will Steffen (Australian away from the point of the National University), these are two among resolution making it unnecessarily four “planetary boundaries” that have long. 4 Strana 30-36 replace already been exceeded. These “planetary These present two out of nine “planetary The original text presents the zelenych boundaries” involve nine thresholds on boundaries”, or nine thresholds on core concept of "planetary boundaries" (Czech core environmental issues (greenhouse gas environmental issues, beyond which human only as an opinion of Rockstrom Greens) amount in atmosphere, biodiversity, but existence would be threatened. The concept and Steffen and, moreover, it does also ocean acidification, land use for crop, has been introduced by a group of not state any source, that this consumption of freshwater...) beyond international scientists, led by Johan opinion is based on.
    [Show full text]
  • Ozone Depletion and Climate Change
    Environment Environnement Canada Canada OzoneOzone DepletionDepletion andand ClimateClimate Change:Change: UnderstandingUnderstanding thethe LinkagesLinkages Angus Fergusson Meteorological Service of Canada Published by authority of the Minister of the Environment Copyright © Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada, 2001 Catalogue No. EN56-168/2001E ISBN: 0-662-30692-9 Également disponible en français Author: Angus Fergusson (Environment Canada) Editing: David Francis (Lanark House Communications) David Wardle / Jim Kerr (Environment Canada) Contributing Authors: Bruce McArthur (Environment Canada): Bratt Lake Observatory David Tarasick (Environment Canada): Canadian Middle Atmosphere Model Tom McElroy (Environment Canada): MANTRA Project Special thanks for comments to: Vitali Fioletov (Environment Canada) Hans Fast (Environment Canada) Pictures: Angus Fergusson (Environment Canada) John Bird (Environment Canada) Brent Colpitts Ray Jackson Layout and Design: BTT Communications Additional copies may be obtained, free of charge, from: Angus Fergusson Science Assessment and Integration Branch Meteorological Service of Canada 4905 Dufferin Street Downsview, Ontario M3H 5T4 E-mail: [email protected] Table of Contents Summary 2 Introduction 4 The Atmosphere and its Radiative Effects 6 The Dynamics of the Atmosphere 10 The Chemistry of the Atmosphere 12 Biogeochemical Linkages: The Impact of Increased UV Radiation 14 Canadian Research and Monitoring 16 Implications for Policy 20 The Research Agenda 22 Making Connections 26 Bibliography 28 Figure 1. Compared to the earth itself, the earth’s atmosphere as seen from space looks remarkably thin, much like the skin on an apple. In this photograph, the two lowest layers of the atmosphere, the troposphere and the stratosphere, are clearly visible. The stratosphere is home to the ozone layer that protects life on earth from intense ultraviolet radiation.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean Acidification and the Permo- Triassic Mass Extinction: Process and Manifestation
    Goldschmidt2015 Abstracts Ocean acidification and the permo- Triassic mass extinction: Process and manifestation S. A. KASEMANN1, R. WOOD2*, M. O. CLARKSON3, T. M. LENTON4, S. J. DAINES4, S. RICHOZ5, F. OHNEMUELLER1, A. MEIXNER1, S. W. POULTON6 AND E. T. TIPPER7 1Department of Geosciences & MARUM-Center for Marine Environmental Sciences, Univ. of Bremen, Germany 2School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, UK (*[email protected]) 3Department of Chemistry, Univ. of Otago, New Zealand 4College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Univ. of Exeter 5Institute of Earth Sciences, University of Graz, Austria 6School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, UK 7Dept. of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, UK Ocean acidification triggered by Siberian Trap volcanism was a possible kill mechanism for the Permian-Triassic Boundary (PTB) mass extinction, but direct evidence for an acidification event is lacking. We present a high resolution seawater pH record across this interval, utilizing boron isotope data (δ11B) combined with petrographic analysis and a quantitative modeling approach. Through this integration we are able to produce an envelope that encompasses the most realistic range in pH, which then allows us to resolve three distinct chronological phases of carbon cycle perturbation, each with very different environmental consequences for the Late Permian-Early Triassic Earth system. In the latest Permian, increased ocean alkalinity, primed the Earth system with a low level of atmospheric CO2 and a high ocean buffering capacity. The first phase of extinction was coincident with a slow injection of carbon into the atmosphere and ocean pH remained stable. During the second extinction pulse, however, a rapid and large injection of carbon caused an abrupt acidification event that drove the preferential loss of heavily calcified marine biota.
    [Show full text]