DOCSLIB.ORG

Anne Laura Mclaren 26 April 1927 7 July 2007 First Published in The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Anne Laura Mclaren 26 April 1927 7 July 2007 First Published in The Anne Laura McLaren 26 April 1927 7 July 2007 First published in The Guardian, 10 July 2007 http://www.theguardian.com/science/2007/jul/10/uk.obituaries Reproduced with permission of The Guardian Dame Anne McLaren, who has died aged 80 in a car accident while travelling with her former husband Donald Michie from Cambridge to London, was one of Britain's leading scientists in the fields of mammalian reproductive and developmental biology and genetics. Her research in the basic science underlying the treatment of infertility helped develop several human-assisted reproduction techniques. Her work also helped further recognition of the importance of stem cells in the treatment of human disease. As she put it, she was interested in "everything involved in getting from one generation to the next". Both of these areas raise serious ethical issues, and Anne was a leading contributor to the debates in the UK needed to develop acceptable public policy regulating them. Among her many honours, she was the first woman to hold office as vice-president and foreign secretary in the more than 300-year-old Royal Society. Anne was the daughter of Henry McLaren, 2nd Baron Aberconway, and Christabel McNaughten. The family had homes in London and Bodnant, north Wales, and she gained a zoology degree at Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford. During postgraduate years at Oxford, she worked under JBS Haldane, Peter Medawar and Kingsley Sanders, and in 1952 obtained her DPhil. The topic of her thesis concerned murine neurotropic viruses, which she studied under Sanders, and in the same year that she obtained her doctorate she married Donald Michie. They then worked together at University College London (1952-55) and at the Royal Veterinary College, London (1955-59). During this period they were interested in the nature versus nurture problem, studying the effect of the maternal environment in mice on the number of lumbar vertebrae. This work led them to take an interest in the technique of embryo transfer and implantation, and in collaboration with me, in showing it was possible to culture mouse embryos in a test tube and obtain live young after placing them in the uterus of a surrogate mother. In 1959 Anne and Donald were divorced, although they both moved to Edinburgh. Anne continued her work on mammalian fertility, embryo transfer techniques, immunocontraception and the mixing of early embryos to form chimeras (organisms consisting of two or more genetically different kinds of tissue) at the Institute of Animal Genetics. Her book on chimeras, published in 1976, is a classic in the field. In 1974 she became the director of the Medical Research Council mammalian development unit at University College London. It was there that she developed her enduring interest in the development differentiation of mammalian primordial germ cells. She wrote another classic book, this time on Germ Cells and Soma, in 1980. After retirement from the Medical Research Council in 1992, she became principal research associate at the Welcome Trust/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute in Cambridge, a position she held at the time of her death. During her career she was an author of more than 300 papers. Many of the areas in which Anne worked are associated with serious ethical issues. One of her principal contributions was as a member of the Warnock Committee, which produced a white paper that played a major role in the passage of the 1987 Family Law Reform Act and the 1990 Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act. The latter established the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, on which Anne served for 10 years. More recently she had been participating in the discussions on the ethical issues involved in developing embryonic stem cells and the use of therapeutic cloning. Anne remained very informal, unpretentious and approachable even after she had acquired a wide international scientific reputation. Her visits to research laboratories were always popular with even the shyest of graduate students and postdoctoral fellows. After willingly listening to a description of their research projects, she would quickly identify the salient problems and come up with valuable suggestions. She always conveyed the feeling that research is fun. Her hospitality was renowned, and many visitors to London stayed in her house. She was an avid football fan, and when any international match was on television it was a waste of time trying to talk to her. Anne was also a great communicator. She became known as a fascinating lecturer and had many invitations to speak at meetings all over the world. Her thoughts were always clearly presented in perfectly enunciated English, and she was a "natural" on television. She interviewed the philosopher Bertrand Russell with ease, and on another occasion when she explained that she and I had successfully cultured mouse embryos in a test tube and produced young after putting them into the uterus of surrogate mothers, she had a white mouse running up and down her arm. She was always concerned that science be explained simply but accurately to the public. Frequently she would come out with a succinct statement such as: "When the embryo is outside the woman's body, genetics tells us that father and mother have equal rights. When the embryo is inside the body, physiology tells us that the woman's right is paramount." Politically Anne was a liberal. During the early stages of the cold war she and Donald kept in active contact with scientists behind the iron curtain. For a while they were penalised by being denied entrance to the US. The barrier was finally overcome when the US government wanted her advice on several committees, including one relating to Nasa. Anne never felt she was discriminated against as a woman, although she was aware of the problem. In an interview in Cambridge for the Association for Women in Science and Engineering (AWiSE), of which she was president, she said: "When I was young I never thought of myself as a woman scientist, just as a scientist, and as a woman. There was no statutory maternity leave, we just had children and got on with things as best we could." She received innumerable honours. In 1975 she was elected a fellow of the Royal Society, in 1986 a fellow of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, and in 1993 she was made a DBE. She was also president of the Society for the Study of Fertility, president of the Society of Developmental Biology, president of the British Association for the Advancement of Science in 1993-94, and fellow of King's College, Cambridge, from 1992 to 1996. At the time of her death she was a member of the European group on ethics that advises the European Commission on the social and ethical implications of new technologies. Among her many awards were the Scientific Medal of the Zoological Society of London (1967), the Pioneer Award of the International Fertility Society (1988, with Donald Michie) and the Royal Medal of the Royal Society (1990). A symposium attended by close friends and colleagues was held in Cambridge in April on the occasion of her 80th birthday. She was an inspiring colleague, and my oldest, dearest friend. Although her marriage to Donald was dissolved, they remained good friends, taking regular holidays with their children. She leaves her son Jonathan, two daughters, Susan and Caroline, and stepson Chris from Donald's first marriage. Mary Warnock writes: I have never enjoyed working with anyone more than with Anne McLaren. For me and the other "lay" members of the committee of inquiry set up by government in 1982 to examine the then new technique of in vitro fertilisation and related questions, she was an indispensable teacher and guide. She taught me what a true scientist should be: a combination of vision and caution, of enthusiasm and a strict demand for evidence. Above all, she had patience, not only with the slow progress of scientific proof, but with the ignorance of her pupils. She was also a model of good sense, a rock in the increasingly fraught atmosphere of the committee, as our differences emerged, our sometimes irrational fears escalated, and our deadline approached. She described herself as an ethical ignoramus, and was sometimes amazed by the passions her work among the pregnant mice seemed to arouse. But her judgment was always listened to with respect. We continued to work closely together in the six years that elapsed between the publication of our report in 1984 and the legislation that incorporated it. In those years she always seemed to find time for us to address groups of MPs, students or members of local women's institutes. Our double act was not only informative, but always, for me, enormous fun. Anne Laura Dorinthea McLaren, DBE, FRS, FRCOG. DPhil(Oxon), HonDSc (Edin,Cantab,York). Born 26 April 1927. Elected FRSE 1971. Died July 7 2007 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Anne Laura Dorinthea Mclaren (1927-2007) [1]
    Published on The Embryo Project Encyclopedia (https://embryo.asu.edu) Anne Laura Dorinthea McLaren (1927-2007) [1] By: Khokhar, Aroob Keywords: Biography [2] Mice [3] Fertilization [4] Anne Laura Dorinthea McLaren was a developmental biologist known for her work withe mbryology [5] in the twentieth century. McLaren was the first researcher to grow mouse [6] embryos outside of the womb [7]. She experimented by culturing mouse [6] eggs and successfully developing them into embryos, leading to advancements with in vitro [8] fertilization [9]. McLaren was born in London, England, on 26 April 1927 to Christabel McNaughten and Henry Duncan McLaren, 2nd Baron Aberconway, who was a politician and industrialist. Growing up, McLaren wanted to pursue an education in English literature, but instead entered Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford, with a scholarship to study zoology. During her undergraduate work, McLaren became intrigued with genetics, in part due to her tutor, Edmund Brisco Ford [10]. After graduating with a honors degree in zoology, she continued her research with geneticist John Burdon Sanderson Haldane at University College London [11] on mite infestation in Drosophila [12]. McLaren continued to pursue her education and in 1952 graduated with a PhD from Oxford University where she studied mice neurotropic viruses with professor Kingsley Sanders [13], furthering her career in genetics. That same year, McLaren wed Donald Michie [14], who also studied and obtained his PhD at Oxford University. They continued working on the genetics of mice with Peter Medawar [15] at University College London [11] and the Royal Veterinary College (RVC) together. At RVC, McLaren worked with researcher John Biggers [16] on the cultivation of mouse [6] embryos, leading to a major technical advance in the history of embryology [5].
    [Show full text]
  • 68690 Kings Parade Summer03
    KING’S Summer 2003 P ARADE Contents Interview: Judith Mayhew 2 Editor’s letter 3 The Masters in the 21st century 3 Parade Profile: Anne McLaren 4–5 Change of direction 6 Science at King’s 7 Books by members 8–9 What is art? 10–11 New Admissions Tutor for Access and Recruitment 12–13 Foundation Lunch 14–16 Praeposita John Barber: New Development Director 17 Here and now 18–19 nova King’s treasures at V&A 19 Events & Crossword 20 “King’s is delighted to announce the Chairman of the Policy & Resources The election was virtually unanimous, election of Dame Judith Mayhew, DBE, Committee of the Corporation of and unanimity is rare in King’s. Dame as Provost. She will take up office on 1 London. Her appointment as Judith will bring wide experience and October 2003. Dame Judith will Chairman of the Royal Opera House personal charm.’ Dame Judith said: ‘It succeed Professor Patrick Bateson, was announced in February. She is is a great honour and privilege to be who will retire after 15 years as Provost. currently Chairman of the Governors elected Provost of King’s, which has a Dame Judith is the first woman to be of Birkbeck College and a Trustee of long tradition of academic excellence elected Provost, and the first non- the Natural History Museum. The in learning and research combined Kingsman for centuries. She is a Vice-Provost, Professor Keith Hopkins, with its outstanding music.’” lawyer and has until recently been said: ‘We are all absolutely delighted. Press Release, 21 February, 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Schuler Dissertation Final Document
    COUNSEL, POLITICAL RHETORIC, AND THE CHRONICLE HISTORY PLAY: REPRESENTING COUNCILIAR RULE, 1588-1603 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Anne-Marie E. Schuler, B.M., M.A. Graduate Program in English The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: Professor Richard Dutton, Advisor Professor Luke Wilson Professor Alan B. Farmer Professor Jennifer Higginbotham Copyright by Anne-Marie E. Schuler 2011 ABSTRACT This dissertation advances an account of how the genre of the chronicle history play enacts conciliar rule, by reflecting Renaissance models of counsel that predominated in Tudor political theory. As the texts of Renaissance political theorists and pamphleteers demonstrate, writers did not believe that kings and queens ruled by themselves, but that counsel was required to ensure that the monarch ruled virtuously and kept ties to the actual conditions of the people. Yet, within these writings, counsel was not a singular concept, and the work of historians such as John Guy, Patrick Collinson, and Ann McLaren shows that “counsel” referred to numerous paradigms and traditions. These theories of counsel were influenced by a variety of intellectual movements including humanist-classical formulations of monarchy, constitutionalism, and constructions of a “mixed monarchy” or a corporate body politic. Because the rhetoric of counsel was embedded in the language that men and women used to discuss politics, I argue that the plays perform a kind of cultural work, usually reserved for literature, that reflects, heightens, and critiques political life and the issues surrounding conceptions of conciliar rule.
    [Show full text]
  • Anne Mclaren 1927–2007
    OBITUARY Anne McLaren 1927–2007 Courtesy of Gurdon Institute Gurdon of Courtesy Paul Burgoyne Anne McLaren died in a car accident along with her former husband Gurdon Institute website (http://www.gurdon.cam.ac.uk/anne-mclaren. and lifelong friend Donald Michie while traveling from Cambridge to html). Anne was of aristocratic stock (her father, Sir Henry McLaren, was London on 7 July 2007. While she made major contributions to studies of 2nd Baron Aberconway), and, at the MDU, I was once astounded to see mouse genetics and development, her immense strength was in distilling a letter addressed to “The Honorable Anne Laura Dorinthea McLaren.” scientific information and communicating it to others, and she worked Anne eschewed titles, and almost anyone who has met her will invari- tirelessly to ensure that sound scientific reasoning informed public policy ably refer to her as Anne rather than Doctor, Professor or Dame (as making. she became in 1993). Anne also had her own highly developed sense of After receiving her D.Phil. at Oxford in 1952, she worked together with social justice and responsibility, to which her whole life is a testimony. Michie in London at University College and then at The Royal Veterinary She joined the Communist Party, and this led to her being denied a visa College, where they became interested in the issue of nature versus nurture to the United States until around 1991—16 years after she had become in determining phenotypic characteristics. Their work, together with that a Fellow of the Royal Society! Anne was an inveterate traveler, heading of their subsequent colleague John Biggers, undermined the prevalent off to meetings in all parts of the globe with only a small rucksack and http://www.nature.com/naturegenetics assumption that the genetic uniformity of inbred mice led to phenotypic a plastic bag of papers to read on the plane.
    [Show full text]
  • Simpson Pm 1
    Int. J. Dev. Biol. 45: 513-518 (2001) The case of the midwife scientist 513 The case of the midwife scientist ELIZABETH SIMPSON* Transplantation Biology Group, MRC Clinical Sciences Centre, Imperial College School of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, London, England ABSTRACT Genes controlling both testis determining and expression of the male-specific trans- plantation antigen, HY, are located on the short arm of the mouse Y chromosome, and on the X and Y-linked translocation, Sxra. A mutation of Sxra was discovered in a cross between an Sxr carrier male and a T16H/X female. This was designated Sxrb and found to affect both the expression of HY and spermatogenesis, but not testis differentiation, thereby disproving Ohno’s hypothesis that HY controlled testis determination. Molecular genetic analysis showed the mutation to be caused by fusion of two duplicated genes, Zfy1 and Zfy2, deleting the intervening DNA. This deletion interval, ∆Sxrb, contained a number of genes, each a candidate HY gene. Expression cloning with HY-specific T cell clones identified Smcy, Uty and Dby as encoding peptide epitopes of this transplantation antigen. The human homologues SMCY and UTY likewise express HY antigens and these are targets of damaging graft-versus-host (GVH) responses and potentially therapeutic graft-versus- leukaemia (GVL) responses following bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Knowledge of the peptide identity of HY epitopes allows monitoring of immune responses following BMT, using fluorescent tetramers, and also offers the possibility of inducing immunological tolerance. KEY WORDS: Sex determination, spermatogenesis, transplantation, HY antigen, expression cloning. Brought together by translocation lymphocytes that effected cellular immune responses appeared to recognise foreign molecules only in the context of their own There were two sorts of translocations that brought me together specialised cell surface glycoprotein molecules.
    [Show full text]
  • Wellcome Witnesses to Twentieth Century Medicine
    WELLCOME WITNESSES TO TWENTIETH CENTURY MEDICINE _______________________________________________________________ TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER IN BRITAIN: THE CASE OF MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES ______________________________________________ SELF AND NON-SELF: A HISTORY OF AUTOIMMUNITY ______________________ ENDOGENOUS OPIATES _____________________________________ THE COMMITTEE ON SAFETY OF DRUGS __________________________________ WITNESS SEMINAR TRANSCRIPTS EDITED BY: E M TANSEY P P CATTERALL D A CHRISTIE S V WILLHOFT L A REYNOLDS Volume One – April 1997 CONTENTS WHAT IS A WITNESS SEMINAR? i E M TANSEY TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER IN BRITAIN: THE CASE OF MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES EDITORS: E M TANSEY AND P P CATTERALL TRANSCRIPT 1 INDEX 33 SELF AND NON-SELF: A HISTORY OF AUTOIMMUNITY EDITORS: E M TANSEY, S V WILLHOFT AND D A CHRISTIE TRANSCRIPT 35 INDEX 65 ENDOGENOUS OPIATES EDITORS: E M TANSEY AND D A CHRISTIE TRANSCRIPT 67 INDEX 100 THE COMMITTEE ON SAFETY OF DRUGS EDITORS: E M TANSEY AND L A REYNOLDS TRANSCRIPT 103 INDEX 133 WHAT IS A WITNESS SEMINAR? Advances in medical science and medical practice throughout the twentieth century, and especially after the Second World War, have proceeded at such a pace, and with such an intensity, that they provide new and genuine challenges to historians. Scientists and clinicians themselves frequently bemoan the rate at which published material proliferates in their disciplines, and the near impossibility of ‘keeping up with the literature’. Pity, then, the poor historian, trying to make sense of this mass of published data, scouring archives for unpublished accounts and illuminating details, and attempting throughout to comprehend, contextualize, reconstruct and convey to others the stories of the recent past and their significance. The extensive published record of modern medicine and medical science raises particular problems for historians: it is often presented in a piecemeal but formal fashion, sometimes seemingly designed to conceal rather than reveal the processes by which scientific medicine is conducted.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Here
    Contributions given at the event for Anne McLaren and Donald Michie Celebrating their lives At the Zoological Society London 19th July, 2007 Anne McLaren and Donald Michie – Opening Remarks Jonathan Michie (Anne & Donald’s son) Welcome Sir Patrick Bateson FRS (President of the Zoological Society of London) Anne the Scientist Ann Clarke (Anne’s colleague) Donald the Scientist Stephen Muggleton (Donald’s colleague) Memories of Donald Chris Michie (Donald’s son) Memories of Susan & Caroline Michie Anne & Donald (Anne & Donald's daughters) Letters written by Jessica Murray (grand-daughter) Memories of Laura Murray (grand-daughter), Anne & Donald Alex & Duncan Michie (grandsons), Rhona Michie (grand-daughter) and When asked what music she would like played when Cameron Michie (grandson) receiving the Japan Prize, Anne wrote: The two songs Anne the Scientist Jim Smith (Chairman, Gurdon Institute, I would like to hear are University of Cambridge) Joan Baez’s ‘Where have all the flowers gone?’, which Memories of Donald Drogo Michie (Donald’s nephew) is a lament not just for the Vietnam war but for all wars, past, present and Memories of Anne Jonathan Michie (Anne & Donald’s son) future, and John Lennon’s ‘Imagine’, which is about a world of peace and love and social harmony. 1 Opening Remarks by Jonathan Michie (Anne & Donald’s son) For those who don’t know me – most of the Nobel Prize, of which Anne was and likely those towards the back of the remains the only woman recipient. hall – my name is Jonathan Michie and I’m not even going to begin to try to explain I’m one of Anne and Donald’s children.
    [Show full text]
  • WOMEN in REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCE: to Be Or Not to Be a Testis
    158 3 REPRODUCTIONFOCUS REVIEW WOMEN IN REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCE To be or not to be a testis Blanche Capel Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA Correspondence should be addressed to B Capel; Email: [email protected] This paper forms part of a focus section on Women in Reproductive Science. The guest editor for this section was Professor Marilyn Renfree, Ian Potter Chair of Zoology, School of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Abstract Work that established the testis as the driver of male development, and the Y chromosome as the bearer of the male-determining gene, established a working model, and set the stage for the molecular age of mammalian sex determination. The discovery and characterization of Sry/SRY at the top of the hierarchy in mammals launched the field in two major directions. The first was to identify the downstream transcription factors and other molecular players that drive the bifurcation of Sertoli and granulosa cell differentiation. The second major direction was to understand organogenesis of the early bipotential gonad, and how divergence of its two distinct morphogenetic pathways (testis and ovary) is regulated at the cellular level. This review will summarize the early discoveries soon after Sry was identified and focus on my study of the gonad as a model of organogenesis. Reproduction (2019) 158 F101–F111 Setting the stage for the molecular investigation of results together, Anne McLaren and others suggested a sex determination working model in which the testis-determining signal (called Tdy) acted to control the development of the Sex determination is a very old field that has fascinated gonad as a testis or ovary (McLaren 1991) (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Anne Mclaren Symposium Prog
    Welcome The Fund Managers of the Anne McLaren Trust, the Reproductive Sociology Research Group and the Chairs of the Strategic Research Initiative in Reproduction are pleased to welcome you to this SDymApYos i1um, our second major conference dedicated to the interdisciplinary exploration of specific issues arising in the context of translational biomedicine. The first conference of this kind was held at the Wellcome Trust in December 2017, and we plan to hold future events of this kind every two or three years. Anne would be very pleased this Symposium is being hosted at Cambridge, where she did so much of her own research, and where she worked with many of the people attending our event today. Anne was a passionate advocate of interdisciplinary collaborations in the name of better science, and she also worked energetically and enthusiastically to promote the study of reproduction in its broadest sense across the world. She would be both thrilled and satisfied to know that "Reproduction' is the latest research area to be formally recognised as an 'SRI' -- or Strategic Research Initiative -- at Cambridge, meaning it is now a stand-alone, funded, cross-School and multi-disciplinary network uniting hundreds of researchers. Anne was one of the people who made this possible, as a keen early supporter of the Cambridge Interdisciplinary Research Forum (CIRF), which was the real start of the pathbreaking Reproduction SRI at Cambridge. The Reproductive Sociology Research Group (ReproSoc) is the third co-sponsor of this event, and we are grateful to all of the funders who support the work of this research initiative, which will soon be entering its second decade here at Cambridge.
    [Show full text]
  • The International Journal of Developmental Biology Published a Special Issue, Edited by Brigid Hogan, Entitled "Mammalian Reproduction & Development"
    THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGYDEVELOPMENTAL www.intjdevbiol.com IN MEMORIAM Anne McLaren was born in London on 26th April, 1927, and died in a car accident en route to London on 7th July, 2007 with her former husband, Donald Michie. Anne was the world’s best known and best loved developmental biologist. Her career spanned over 50 years, and included not only outstanding science, but also a major contribution to science policy and to women in science. She was the 4th child (of 5) of Sir Henry McLaren, 2nd Baron Aberconway and Christabel McNaughten, but these aristocratic origins were something to which she never referred. She chose to study Zoology at Oxford because “it sounded easier to pass the entrance exams than those in English literature” (McLaren, 2007), and graduated with Honours in 1949. She says she needed to get a D.Phil. in 2 years because the first year “hadn’t worked out” so she chose neurotropic viruses because they “breed much quicker than rabbits”! This led to her first press interviews, because her studies with mice had implications for polio, which was pandemic in young active people at the time. Anne (and Donald) were paid up members of the Communist party, joining in the early 1950s during the Cold War, a lifelong commitment to socialism that underpinned their interest in science as a means of improving society. Anne listed her interests as “Reproductive biology of mammals, in particular oogenesis, ovulation, implantation, immunology of reproduction. Developmental biology of mammals, in particular sex determination, development of primordial germ cells, and stem cells.
    [Show full text]
  • BRYAN CAMPBELL CLARKE ANN CLARKE 24 June 1932
    BRYAN CAMPBELL CLARKE ANN CLARKE 24 june 1932 . 27 february 2014 PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY VOL. 161, NO. 1, MARCH 2017 Clarke.indd 85 4/7/2017 3:51:19 PM biographical memoirs ROFESSOR BRYAN CLARKE was a world-leading evolutionary geneticist. He combined theoretical understanding of the principles P of evolutionary biology, an appreciation of the process of molec- ular evolution, and a love of fieldwork, through which he studied the genetic diversity of wild populations and the patterns of natural selection that operated on them. Bryan’s primary interest was in studying evolution in the wild. In trying to observe evolution in action, geneticists focus on genetic polymorphisms, in which different genetic types (“morphs”) coexist in the same wild population. In understanding how such variation is generated, and how it is maintained, we gain insight into the process of evolution as it has operated over the course of life on earth. Bryan’s early years were spent in England. His family had roots in the Bolton area of Lancashire—a county whose industrial legacy of cotton mills contrasts with its possession of some of the most pleasant rural areas of the country. But Bryan was born in the summer of 1932 in Gatley, a rural suburb south of the industrial city of Manchester, in the county of Cheshire. Later, age 6, Bryan moved with his parents and sister to the county of Northamptonshire, where he lived initially in the village of Stanwick, moving to Sywell after one winter. Their home at Sywell Hall, an Elizabethan house of 40 rooms, reflected the family’s increasing fortunes.
    [Show full text]
  • Stem Cell Research – Second Update
    Stem cell research – second update The Royal Society issued two documents on the subject of stem cell research in 2000: ‘Therapeutic Cloning’ and ‘Stem Cell Research and Therapeutic Cloning: an update’ (available on www.royalsoc.ac.uk). The following further update has been prepared in response to the inquiry by the House of Lords Ad Hoc Committee on stem cell research and specifically addresses the questions set out in the call for evidence, it should be read in conjunction with the other two publications on the subject. The response has been prepared by a working group chaired by Professor Richard Gardner FRS (Dept Zoology, University of Oxford), and comprising Dr Maeve Caldwell (MRC Centre for Brain Repair, Cambridge), Professor Christopher Graham FRS (Dept Zoology, University of Oxford), Sir John Gurdon FRS (Wellcome CRC Institute, Cambridge), Dr Robin Lovell-Badge FRS (National Institute for Medical Research, London), Dr Anne McLaren FRS (Wellcome CRC Institute, Cambridge), Dr Robert Moor FRS (Babraham Institute, Cambridge), Dr Austin Smith (Centre for Genome Research, University of Edinburgh), and Professor Azim Surani FRS (Wellcome CRC Institute, Cambridge) with support from Dr Rebecca Bowden and Dr Josephine Craig (Secretariat, Royal Society). The response has been endorsed by the Council of the Royal Society. 1 Do the additional purposes in the 2001 Regulations raise issues of principle different from the purposes specified in the 1990 Act? The additional purposes in themselves do not raise additional issues of principle. Serious degenerative diseases are at least as worthy an objective as infertility or contraception. However one impact is that some of the research initiated under the additional purposes may require the use of embryos produced specifically for research (somatic cell nuclear transplantation) rather than ‘spare’ embryos.
    [Show full text]