DOCSLIB.ORG

Carabidae (Insecta: Coleoptera): Synopsis of Supraspecific Taxa

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Larochelle, A.; Larivière, M.-C. 2007: Carabidae (Insecta: Coleoptera): synopsis of supraspecific taxa. Fauna of New Zealand 60, 188 pp. EDITORIAL BOARD REPRESENTATIVES OF L ANDCARE R ESEARCH Dr D. Choquenot Landcare Research Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand Dr R. J. B. Hoare, Dr M.-C. Larivière Landcare Research Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand REPRESENTATIVE OF UNIVERSITIES Dr R.M. Emberson c/- Bio-Protection and Ecology Division P.O. Box 84, Lincoln University, New Zealand REPRESENTATIVE OF M USEUMS Mr R.L. Palma Natural Environment Department Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa P.O. Box 467, Wellington, New Zealand REPRESENTATIVE OF OVERSEAS I NSTITUTIONS Dr M. J. Fletcher Director of the Collections NSW Agricultural Scientific Collections Unit Forest Road, Orange NSW 2800, Australia * * * SERIES EDITOR Dr T. K. Crosby Landcare Research Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand Fauna of New Zealand Ko te Aitanga Pepeke o Aotearoa Number / Nama 60 Carabidae (Insecta: Coleoptera): synopsis of supraspecific taxa A. Larochelle and M.-C. Larivière Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170 Auckland, New Zealand [email protected] [email protected] Manaaki W h e n u a P R E S S Lincoln, Canterbury, New Zealand 2007 4 Larochelle & Larivière (2007): Carabidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) Copyright © Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd 2007 No part of this work covered by copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means (graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping information retrieval systems, or otherwise) without the written permission of the publisher. Cataloguing in publication Larochelle, André, 1940 Apr. 10– Carabidae (Insecta: Coleoptera): synopsis of supraspecific taxa / A. Larochelle and M.-C. Larivière – Lincoln, N.Z. : Manaaki Whenua Press, Landcare Research, 2007. (Fauna of New Zealand, ISSN 0111–5383 ; no. 60). ISBN 978-0-478-09394-0 I. Larivière, Marie-Claude II. Title III. Series UDC 595.762.12 Suggested citation: Larochelle, A.; Larivière, M.-C. 2007. Carabidae (Insecta: Coleoptera): synopsis of supraspecific taxa. Fauna of New Zealand 60, 188 pp. Prepared for publication by the series editor and the authors using computer-based text processing, layout, and printing at Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand. M~ori text by H. Jacob, Auckland. Published by Manaaki Whenua Press, Landcare Research, P.O. Box 40, Lincoln, Canterbury, N.Z. Website: http://www.mwpress.co.nz/ Printed by PrintLink Ltd, Wellington Date of publication 21 November 2007 Front cover: Brullea antarctica Laporte de Castelnau, 1867 (Illustrator: A. C. Harris). Publication of the Fauna of New Zealand series is the result of a research investment by the Foundation for Research, Science and Technology under contract number C09X0501. Fauna of New Zealand 60 5 POPULAR SUMMARY HE WHAKARAPOPOTOTANGA Class Insecta Order Coleoptera Family Carabidae Ground beetles The family Carabidae (ground-beetles, including tiger- beetles) is composed of over 34,000 species distributed among 1,927 genera worldwide. Carabids occupy most land habitats on nearly all continents. These beetles are abundant in the field and attract attention with their pecu- liar shape and coloration. They are mostly active at night and prey on a wide range of small animals such as other insects and spiders; some species are active during the day Illustration / Whakaahua: Mecodema regulus Britton, and feed on plant tissue. Most ground-beetles, in temper- 1964 (Illustrator / Kaiwhakaahua: B. E. Rhode ). ate climates at least, live at the surface of the ground, while Ng~ p§tara noho papa some species dwell in the soil (e.g., Anillina), in caves (e.g., ~ ~ Trechini, Harpalini), or on the vegetation (e.g., Zolini, Kua hipa ake i te 34,000 ng momo o te wh nau Carabidae ~ § ~ ~ Ç ~ Lebiini). Most New Zealand species cannot fly, which (ng p tara noho papa, tae atu ki ng t taka), n ng reduces their dispersal capacity and affects the flow of puninga 1,927, huri katoa i te ao. Kitea ai ng~ pepeke nei ~ ~ genes defining their body shape, making it rather variable. i te nuinga o ng k inga noho o te taiwhenua, i te nuinga o In 2001, Larochelle & Larivière’s Catalogue (Fauna of New ng~ whenua-rahi o te ao. He p§tara ngaruru, he tiwha anÇ, Zealand 43) recorded 5 subfamilies, 20 tribes, 78 genera, n~ te rerek‘ o te hanga me ng~ tae. Ko te nuinga, he haere Ç ~ ~ ~ and 424 species for this country, whereas this new work p , , kai ai r tou i ng momo hanga huhua, tae atu ki te recognises 7 subfamilies, 21 tribes, 86 genera, and 461 pepeke me te pãng~werewere; heoi, ko ‘tahi momo, he ~ ‘ ~ ~ ~ species. When completely inventoried and described the haere awatea, , kai ai r r i te tipu. Ko te nuinga o ng fauna will likely reach 800 species. Compared with larger p§tara noho papa i ng~ takiw~ k~ore i tino makariri, ka or warmer regions of the world, the New Zealand fauna noho ki te mata tonu o Papa, engari ko ‘tahi ka noho ki may appear relatively small, but New Zealand is a very roto tonu i te oneone (hei tauira, ko Anillina), ki te ana (hei special place – a biodiversity ‘hot-spot’ – with fifty genera tauira, ko Trechini me Harpalini), ki te otaota r~nei (p‘r~ ~ (58 % of fauna) found nowhere else in the world. The i a Zolini me Lebiini). He rerekore te nuinga o ng momo o remaining genera not endemic to this country are made up Aotearoa, n~ kon~ i kore ai e pirara ki tawhiti, n~ kon~ anÇ of overseas genera introduced mainly from Australia and i herea ai te hanumi haere o ng~ ira e whakatau ana i te native genera shared with Australia and other parts of the hanga o te tinana, me te aha, kua kaha tonu te taurangi o world. t‘r~ ~hua. I te R~rangi a Larochelle & Larivière (Ko te ~ In New Zealand, ground-beetles are generally recognised Aitanga Pepeke o Aotearoa 43) o te tau 2001, e 5 ng by the following body features: length, 1.0–39.0 mm; colour wh~nau iti, e 20 ng~ iwi, e 78 ng~ puninga, e 424 ng~ dark (usually black or brown); elytra (wing covers) rarely momo i Aotearoa nei. Engari i t‘nei tuhinga hou, e 7 ng~ ~ ~ ~ ~ spotted; dorsal surface without hair cover; head narrower wh nau iti, e 21 ng iwi, e 86 ng puninga, e 461 ng than pronotum (dorsal part between head and wings); momo. Kia oti rawa ng~ hu~nga katoa te whakar~rangi, te ‘ ~ ~ mandibles well developed, with sharp tips; eyes moderate whakaahua, t r ka eke ki te 800 ng momo. Ina whakaritea in size; antennae thread-like or beaded like a necklace, ki ng~ takiw~ nui ake, mahana ake o te ao, k~ore i p‘r~ composed of 11 segments; pronotum narrower than elytra, rawa te wh~nui o te puna p§tara noho papa o Aotearoa. ~ ~ with a pronounced mobility; legs long and slender, fit for Engari he w hi ahurei tonu a Aotearoa, i te mea e 50 o ng running; tarsi (last part of legs) composed of 5 segments; puninga o Aotearoa (e 58% o ng~ p§tara), k~ore e kitea ana (continued overleaf) (haere tonu) 6 Larochelle & Larivière (2007): Carabidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) elytra fused, with striae (deepened lines) present; i t‘tahi atu w~hi kotahi nei o te ao. O ‘r~ atu puninga ehara membranous wings very short, almost absent. Most nÇ konei taketake ake, i ahu mai i Ahitereiria, he puninga carabids are recognisable alive by a peculiar way of running m~ori r~nei nÇ konei me Ahitereiria, nÇ konei r~nei me on the ground. ‘tahi atu whenua o te ao. As a family, Carabidae are sensitive to their environment I Aotearoa nei, ka tautohua nuitia ng~ p§tara papa i and are commonly used as biological indicators to evaluate runga anÇ i ng~ ~huatanga e whai ake nei: te roa, 1.0–39.0 the diversity of life in ecological systems, indicate the mm; te uriuri o te tae (he pango, he parauri te nuinga); ng~ influence of landscape changes, evaluate environmental kahu parirau, he tino ruarua ng~ mea kÇiraira; te tuar~, he health, predict the effect of climate changes, select habitats huruhuru kore; te upoko, he wh~iti ake i te papatua for nature conservation, and characterise forest soil. They pohomua; te waha, he pakari tonu, he koi ng~ pito; ng~ can also be used to control pest insects (e.g., caterpillars). karu, k~ore i tino iti, k~ore r~nei i tino rahi; ng~ p ãhihi, me In the future, ground-beetles may become more commonly te miro te hanga, me te hei r~nei kua tuia atu he k~kano ki used in biological control, e.g., as natural control agents runga, 11 ng~ w~hanga; te papatua pohomua, he wh~iti against harmful insects, especially soil pests, or as control ake i ng~ kahu parirau, he ~hua nekeneke anÇ; ng~ waewae, agents of weeds, especially their seeds. In New Zealand, he roa, he tÇhihi, he pai mÇ te oma; te w~hanga conservation biologists have listed many, often large-sized whakamutunga o ng~ waewae, e 5 ng~ w~hanga iti; ng~ carabids, as rare or threatened and worthy of protection. kahu parirau, kua hono tahi, he haenga anÇ kei te mata; This Fauna of New Zealand contribution is aimed at ng~ parirau, he rite ki te kiriuhi, he tino poto, he toenga specialists and non-specialists; it should greatly facilitate parirau kau. He m~m~ te tautohu i te nuinga o ng~ p§tara identification and information gathering.
Recommended publications
  • Anisodactylus Binotatus Fabr., a Carabid Beetle New to New Zealand, and a Review of the Exotic Carabid Fauna

    Anisodactylus Binotatus Fabr., a Carabid Beetle New to New Zealand, and a Review of the Exotic Carabid Fauna

    Pacific Insects 5 (4) : 837-847 December 30, 1963 ANISODACTYLUS BINOTATUS FABR., A CARABID BEETLE NEW TO NEW ZEALAND, AND A REVIEW OF THE EXOTIC CARABID FAUNA By R. L. C. Pilgrim DEPT, OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY, NEW ZEALAND Abstract: Anisodactylus binotatus Fabr. 1787 (Col.: Carabidae), an introduced species now established in Canterbury (South Island), New Zealand, is reported for the first time. The literature respecting other carabids sometimes recorded as introduced is reviewed; Ago- nochila binotata (White, 1846), Agonum submetallicum (White, 1846), Hypharpax australasiae (Dejean, 1829) and Pentagonica vittipennis Chaudoir, 1877 are shown to be better considered as endemic to the Australia - New Zealand area. Other species are classed as either native to New Zealand, clearly introduced though not all established, or of doubtful occurrence in New Zealand. Introduction: The Carabidae of New Zealand are predominantly endemic species, but a small number of exotic species has been recorded. This paper reports a further introduc­ tion to the carabid fauna of this country and concludes with a survey of recorded exotic Carabidae in New Zealand. Specimens of the newly-recorded species were collected in domestic gardens in Christ­ church, and were included in a collection sent for identification to Dr. E. B. Britton, British Museum (Nat. Hist.), who kindly drew the writer's attention to the fact that they were so far unreported from New Zealand. Description of adult (from New Zealand specimens) Fig. 1. Anisodactylus binotatus Fabricius, 1787 Color: Head, pronotum, elytra and femora black; tibiae and tarsi light brown to red- black ; palps and antennal segments 1-2 brown, remainder of antennae black; leg spines red-brown; head with small red spot on frons between eyes.
  • Cravens Peak Scientific Study Report

    Cravens Peak Scientific Study Report

    Geography Monograph Series No. 13 Cravens Peak Scientific Study Report The Royal Geographical Society of Queensland Inc. Brisbane, 2009 The Royal Geographical Society of Queensland Inc. is a non-profit organization that promotes the study of Geography within educational, scientific, professional, commercial and broader general communities. Since its establishment in 1885, the Society has taken the lead in geo- graphical education, exploration and research in Queensland. Published by: The Royal Geographical Society of Queensland Inc. 237 Milton Road, Milton QLD 4064, Australia Phone: (07) 3368 2066; Fax: (07) 33671011 Email: [email protected] Website: www.rgsq.org.au ISBN 978 0 949286 16 8 ISSN 1037 7158 © 2009 Desktop Publishing: Kevin Long, Page People Pty Ltd (www.pagepeople.com.au) Printing: Snap Printing Milton (www.milton.snapprinting.com.au) Cover: Pemberton Design (www.pembertondesign.com.au) Cover photo: Cravens Peak. Photographer: Nick Rains 2007 State map and Topographic Map provided by: Richard MacNeill, Spatial Information Coordinator, Bush Heritage Australia (www.bushheritage.org.au) Other Titles in the Geography Monograph Series: No 1. Technology Education and Geography in Australia Higher Education No 2. Geography in Society: a Case for Geography in Australian Society No 3. Cape York Peninsula Scientific Study Report No 4. Musselbrook Reserve Scientific Study Report No 5. A Continent for a Nation; and, Dividing Societies No 6. Herald Cays Scientific Study Report No 7. Braving the Bull of Heaven; and, Societal Benefits from Seasonal Climate Forecasting No 8. Antarctica: a Conducted Tour from Ancient to Modern; and, Undara: the Longest Known Young Lava Flow No 9. White Mountains Scientific Study Report No 10.
  • Antarctica (Brullea), Mecodema Aberrans, Mecodema Moniliferum and Mecodema Tibiale (Metaglymma); We Synonymise M

    Antarctica (Brullea), Mecodema Aberrans, Mecodema Moniliferum and Mecodema Tibiale (Metaglymma); We Synonymise M

    1 "Tidying up some loose ends....." Dave Seldon *1 1 University of Auckland, School of Biological Sciences, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142 Eligible for student prize Mecodema (Carabidae: Broscini: Nothobroscina) is a hyper-diverse endemic New Zealand genus with species spread throughout the two main islands, as well as many offshore islands. Using specimens from a number of private and institutional collections, plus new specimens acquired by extensive pitfall trapping, we describe / redescribe the North Island Mecodema species. Species descriptions were composed using 126 morphological characters, which include external structures, as well as both male and female internal structures. There are four new combinations: Mecodema antarctica (Brullea), Mecodema aberrans, Mecodema moniliferum and Mecodema tibiale (Metaglymma); we synonymise M. occiputale under M. curvidens, and M. sulcatum under M. oblongum. We describe 25 new species, 13 of which are found in Northland and Auckland regions, while six are described from Hawke’s Bay / East Cape regions. This research increases the total number of described Mecodema species to 103, and will give a modern taxonomic framework to complete the revision of the South Island species. 2 Phylogenetics of New Zealand weevils Richard Leschen *1, Talia Brav-Cubitt 1, Thomas Buckley 1, Sam Brown 2, Steve Davis 3 1 Landcare, Auckland 2 Plant & Food, Auckland 3 American Museum of Natural History, New York Folks may be familiar with New Zealand species like the Giraffe Weevil, Lasiorhynchus barbicornis Lacordaire (Brentidae), Spear Grass weevils (Hadrampus Broun) and a number of the strange cryptically coloured genera of Eugnomini. But these icons are just a small part of the New Zealand fauna, which contains approximately 1200 described species placed in 243 genera.
  • From Characters of the Female Reproductive Tract

    From Characters of the Female Reproductive Tract

    Phylogeny and Classification of Caraboidea Mus. reg. Sci. nat. Torino, 1998: XX LCE. (1996, Firenze, Italy) 107-170 James K. LIEBHERR and Kipling W. WILL* Inferring phylogenetic relationships within Carabidae (Insecta, Coleoptera) from characters of the female reproductive tract ABSTRACT Characters of the female reproductive tract, ovipositor, and abdomen are analyzed using cladi­ stic parsimony for a comprehensive representation of carabid beetle tribes. The resulting cladogram is rooted at the family Trachypachidae. No characters of the female reproductive tract define the Carabidae as monophyletic. The Carabidac exhibit a fundamental dichotomy, with the isochaete tri­ bes Metriini and Paussini forming the adelphotaxon to the Anisochaeta, which includes Gehringiini and Rhysodini, along with the other groups considered member taxa in Jeannel's classification. Monophyly of Isochaeta is supported by the groundplan presence of a securiform helminthoid scle­ rite at the spermathecal base, and a rod-like, elongate laterotergite IX leading to the explosion cham­ ber of the pygidial defense glands. Monophyly of the Anisochaeta is supported by the derived divi­ sion of gonocoxa IX into a basal and apical portion. Within Anisochaeta, the evolution of a secon­ dary spermatheca-2, and loss ofthe primary spermathcca-I has occurred in one lineage including the Gehringiini, Notiokasiini, Elaphrini, Nebriini, Opisthiini, Notiophilini, and Omophronini. This evo­ lutionary replacement is demonstrated by the possession of both spermatheca-like structures in Gehringia olympica Darlington and Omophron variegatum (Olivier). The adelphotaxon to this sper­ matheca-2 clade comprises a basal rhysodine grade consisting of Clivinini, Promecognathini, Amarotypini, Apotomini, Melaenini, Cymbionotini, and Rhysodini. The Rhysodini and Clivinini both exhibit a highly modified laterotergite IX; long and thin, with or without a clavate lateral region.
  • East Gippsland, Victoria

    East Gippsland, Victoria

    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
  • A Genus-Level Supertree of Adephaga (Coleoptera) Rolf G

    A Genus-Level Supertree of Adephaga (Coleoptera) Rolf G

    ARTICLE IN PRESS Organisms, Diversity & Evolution 7 (2008) 255–269 www.elsevier.de/ode A genus-level supertree of Adephaga (Coleoptera) Rolf G. Beutela,Ã, Ignacio Riberab, Olaf R.P. Bininda-Emondsa aInstitut fu¨r Spezielle Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie, FSU Jena, Germany bMuseo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid, Spain Received 14 October 2005; accepted 17 May 2006 Abstract A supertree for Adephaga was reconstructed based on 43 independent source trees – including cladograms based on Hennigian and numerical cladistic analyses of morphological and molecular data – and on a backbone taxonomy. To overcome problems associated with both the size of the group and the comparative paucity of available information, our analysis was made at the genus level (requiring synonymizing taxa at different levels across the trees) and used Safe Taxonomic Reduction to remove especially poorly known species. The final supertree contained 401 genera, making it the most comprehensive phylogenetic estimate yet published for the group. Interrelationships among the families are well resolved. Gyrinidae constitute the basal sister group, Haliplidae appear as the sister taxon of Geadephaga+ Dytiscoidea, Noteridae are the sister group of the remaining Dytiscoidea, Amphizoidae and Aspidytidae are sister groups, and Hygrobiidae forms a clade with Dytiscidae. Resolution within the species-rich Dytiscidae is generally high, but some relations remain unclear. Trachypachidae are the sister group of Carabidae (including Rhysodidae), in contrast to a proposed sister-group relationship between Trachypachidae and Dytiscoidea. Carabidae are only monophyletic with the inclusion of a non-monophyletic Rhysodidae, but resolution within this megadiverse group is generally low. Non-monophyly of Rhysodidae is extremely unlikely from a morphological point of view, and this group remains the greatest enigma in adephagan systematics.
  • Measuring Genome Sizes Using Read-Depth, K-Mers, and Flow Cytometry: Methodological Comparisons in Beetles (Coleoptera)

    Measuring Genome Sizes Using Read-Depth, K-Mers, and Flow Cytometry: Methodological Comparisons in Beetles (Coleoptera)

    G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics Early Online, published on June 29, 2020 as doi:10.1534/g3.120.401028 1 Measuring genome sizes using read-depth, k-mers, and flow 2 cytometry: methodological comparisons in beetles (Coleoptera) 3 James M. Pflug,*, Valerie Renee Holmes,† Crystal Burrus,† J. Spencer Johnston,† and David R. 4 Maddison* 5 6 *Department of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA 7 †Department of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA 8 1 Corresponding author: 3029 Cordley Hall, Department of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA. E-mail: [email protected] © The Author(s) 2020. Published by the Genetics Society of America. 2 9 Abstract 10 Measuring genome size across different species can yield important insights into 11 evolution of the genome and allow for more informed decisions when designing next-generation 12 genomic sequencing projects. New techniques for estimating genome size using shallow 13 genomic sequence data have emerged which have the potential to augment our knowledge of 14 genome sizes, yet these methods have only been used in a limited number of empirical studies. In 15 this project, we compare estimation methods using next-generation sequencing (k-mer methods 16 and average read depth of single-copy genes) to measurements from flow cytometry, a standard 17 method for genome size measures, using ground beetles (Carabidae) and other members of the 18 beetle suborder Adephaga as our test system. We also present a new protocol for using read- 19 depth of single-copy genes to estimate genome size.
  • Beetles in a Suburban Environment: a New Zealand Case Study. The

    Beetles in a Suburban Environment: a New Zealand Case Study. The

    tl n brbn nvrnnt: lnd td tl n brbn nvrnnt: lnd td h Idntt nd tt f Clptr n th ntrl nd dfd hbtt f nfld Alnd (4-8 GKhl . : rh At SI lnt rttn Mnt Albrt rh Cntr rvt Alnd lnd • SI lnt rttn prt • EW EAA EAME O SCIEIIC A IUSIA ESEAC 199 O Ο Ν Ε W Ε Ν ttr Grnt rd Τ Ε Ρ Ο Ι Ο Τ ie wi e suo o a oey Sciece eseac Ga om e ew eaa oey Gas oa is suo is gaeuy ackowege Ρ EW EAA SI ' EAME O lnt SCIEIIC A rttn IUSIA Wāhn ESEAC Mn p Makig Sciece Wok o ew eaa KUSCE G eees i a suua eiome a ew eaa case suy e ieiy a saus o Coeoea i e aua a moiie aias o yie Aucka (197-199 / G Kusce — Aucka SI 199 (SI a oecio eo ISS 11-1 ; o3 IS -77-59- I ie II Seies UC 5957(93111 © Cow Coyig uise y SI a oecio M Ae eseac Cee iae ag Aucka ew eaa eceme 199 ie y Geea iig Seices eso ew eaa Etiam pristina in aua Asο i a aua seig summa securitas et futura sweet tranquility and nature ., OISIECE e oe-eeig emoyci eee ioycus uuus (ou o is aie ooca os kaikaea (acycaus acyioies om e yie eee suey aea Aucka ew eaa e wie gaues o e eee ae oe cuses a ass ees is eee as a eic saus o uike a o e uaaa (Seoo as ossi eiece sows a e weei gou was iig i uassic imes way ack i e ea o e iosaus a gymosems moe a 1 miio yeas ago OEWO As a small boy in the 1930s I used to collect butterflies on the South Downs in southern England.
  • The Little Things That Run the City How Do Melbourne’S Green Spaces Support Insect Biodiversity and Promote Ecosystem Health?

    The Little Things That Run the City How Do Melbourne’S Green Spaces Support Insect Biodiversity and Promote Ecosystem Health?

    The Little Things that Run the City How do Melbourne’s green spaces support insect biodiversity and promote ecosystem health? Luis Mata, Christopher D. Ives, Georgia E. Garrard, Ascelin Gordon, Anna Backstrom, Kate Cranney, Tessa R. Smith, Laura Stark, Daniel J. Bickel, Saul Cunningham, Amy K. Hahs, Dieter Hochuli, Mallik Malipatil, Melinda L Moir, Michaela Plein, Nick Porch, Linda Semeraro, Rachel Standish, Ken Walker, Peter A. Vesk, Kirsten Parris and Sarah A. Bekessy The Little Things that Run the City – How do Melbourne’s green spaces support insect biodiversity and promote ecosystem health? Report prepared for the City of Melbourne, November 2015 Coordinating authors Luis Mata Christopher D. Ives Georgia E. Garrard Ascelin Gordon Sarah Bekessy Interdisciplinary Conservation Science Research Group Centre for Urban Research School of Global, Urban and Social Studies RMIT University 124 La Trobe Street Melbourne 3000 Contributing authors Anna Backstrom, Kate Cranney, Tessa R. Smith, Laura Stark, Daniel J. Bickel, Saul Cunningham, Amy K. Hahs, Dieter Hochuli, Mallik Malipatil, Melinda L Moir, Michaela Plein, Nick Porch, Linda Semeraro, Rachel Standish, Ken Walker, Peter A. Vesk and Kirsten Parris. Cover artwork by Kate Cranney ‘Melbourne in a Minute Scavenger’ (Ink and paper on paper, 2015) This artwork is a little tribute to a minute beetle. We found the brown minute scavenger beetle (Corticaria sp.) at so many survey plots for the Little Things that Run the City project that we dubbed the species ‘Old Faithful’. I’ve recreated the map of the City of Melbourne within the beetle’s body. Can you trace the outline of Port Phillip Bay? Can you recognise the shape of your suburb? Next time you’re walking in a park or garden in the City of Melbourne, keep a keen eye out for this ubiquitous little beetle.
  • Ground Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) of Azarbaijan, Iran

    Ground Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) of Azarbaijan, Iran

    Turkish Journal of Zoology Turk J Zool (2013) 37: 188-194 http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/zoology/ © TÜBİTAK Research Article doi:10.3906/zoo-1206-32 Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) of Azarbaijan, Iran Ahmad ATAMEHR* Department of Agriculture, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil Branch, Ardabil, Iran Received: 27.06.2012 Accepted: 24.11.2012 Published Online: 25.02.2013 Printed: 25.03.2013 Abstract: The Carabidae family (Coleoptera) is among the dominant groups of terrestrial predators and includes more than 40,000 species worldwide, making it one of the largest families of beetles. The fauna of Carabidae in Azarbaijan, Iran, is very diverse and has not been studied thoroughly. In the following paper, this group of beneficial predators is studied, using samples taken through 2007–2010 across Azarbaijan. Species belonging to 12 subfamilies were collected from 24 different localities. Among this diverse fauna, 3 species, Broscus cephalotes (Linnaeus, 1758), Harpalus (Pseudoophonus) calceatus (Duftschmid, 1812), and Amara (Xenocelia) ingenua Duftschmid, 1812 are new records for Iranian fauna. Key words: Carabidae, ground beetle, new record, Azarbaijan, Iran 1. Introduction (2007), Toledano and Marggi (2007), and Muilwijk and Carabidae Latreille 1802, or ground beetles, belong to Felix (2008). the suborder Adephaga and order Coleoptera, and they Despite the importance of ground beetles as predators comprise more than 40,000 species worldwide. Carabids of insect pests in agroecosystems, few faunistic studies often are found on the ground and under stones or have been carried out in the study area (Afshar, 1944; logs, or in leaf litter, but many of them, especially those Farahbakhsh, 1961; Zomorrodi, 1990; Esmaili et al., 1991; in the tropics, are arboreal.
  • Revision of the Genusaxonya ANDREWES, 1923

    Revision of the Genusaxonya ANDREWES, 1923

    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Zeitschrift der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Österreichischer Entomologen Jahr/Year: 1999 Band/Volume: 51 Autor(en)/Author(s): Dostal Alexander, Zettel Herbert Artikel/Article: Revision of the genus Axonya Andrewes, 1923 (Coleoptera: Carabidae). 109-118 ©Arbeitsgemeinschaft Österreichischer Entomologen, Wien, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Z.Arb.Gem.Öst.Ent. 51 109-118 Wien, 15. 12. 1999 ISSN 0375-5223 Revision of the genus Axonya ANDREWES, 1923 (Coleoptera: Carabidae) Alexander DOSTAL and Herbert ZETTEL Abstract The genus Axonya ANDREWES, 1923 is revised. Two species are newly described: Axonya farsica nov. spec, from Iran and Axonya similis nov. spec, from Nepal and Northeast India. Axonya championi ANDREWES, 1923 is redescribed and revised, and a lectotype is designated. A key to the species is provided. Zusammenfassung Es wird die Gattung Axonya ANDREWES, 1923 revidiert. Zwei Arten werden neu beschrie- ben: Axonya farsica nov. spec, aus dem Iran und Axonya similis nov. spec, von Nepal und Nordost-Indien. Axonya championi ANDREWES, 1923 wird neu definiert und beschrieben sowie ein Lectotypus festgelegt. Die Arten werden in einer Bestimmungstabelle aufge- schlüsselt. Key words: Coleoptera, Carabidae, Broscinae, Axonya, new species, key, lectotype designation, India, Iran, Nepal. Introduction The Genus Axonya ANDREWES, 1923 belongs to the subfamily Broscinae. Its description is based on a single reference species, A. championi ANDREWES, 1923, with a few records from North India. No further species has been included so far, and no publications on Axonya are available since ANDREWES (1935). The surprising finding of a new species of Axonya in southern Iran encouraged the authors to carry out a more detailed taxonomic study on this poorly known genus.
  • Carabidae (Insecta: Coleoptera): Catalogue

    Carabidae (Insecta: Coleoptera): Catalogue

    INVERTEBRATE SYSTEMATICS ADVISORY GROUP REPRESENTATIVES OF LANDCARE RESEARCH Dr D.R. Penman Landcare Research Lincoln Agriculture & Science Centre P.O. Box 69, Lincoln, New Zealand Dr T.K. Crosby and Dr M.-C. Larivière Landcare Research Mount Albert Research Centre Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand REPRESENTATIVE OF UNIVERSITIES Dr R.M. Emberson Ecology and Entomology Group Soil, Plant, and Ecological Sciences Division P.O. Box 84, Lincoln University, New Zealand REPRESENTATIVE OF MUSEUMS Mr R.L. Palma Natural Environment Department Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa P.O. Box 467, Wellington, New Zealand REPRESENTATIVE OF OVERSEAS INSTITUTIONS Dr J.F. Lawrence CSIRO Division of Entomology G.P.O. Box 1700, Canberra City A.C.T. 2601, Australia * * * SERIES EDITOR Dr T. K. Crosby Landcare Research Mount Albert Research Centre Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand Fauna of New Zealand Ko te Aitanga Pepeke o Aotearoa Number / Nama 43 Carabidae (Insecta: Coleoptera): catalogue A. Larochelle and M.-C. Larivière Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand [email protected] [email protected] Manaaki W h e n u a PRESS Lincoln, Canterbury, New Zealand 2001 4 Larochelle & Larivière (2001): Carabidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) catalogue Copyright © Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd 2001 No part of this work covered by copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means (graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping information retrieval systems, or otherwise) without the written permission of the publisher. Cataloguing in publication LAROCHELLE, André, 1940– Carabidae (Insecta: Coleoptera): catalogue / A. Larochelle and M.-C. Larivière – Lincoln, Canterbury, N.Z.