DOCSLIB.ORG

Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 3: Analytical Framework..............................................................................3-1 A. INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................3-1 B. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS.....................................................................3-1 1. LEGISLATIVE APPLICABILITY......................................................................................3-1 2. GENERIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (GEIS)..............................................3-1 3. PROCESS OVERVIEW...................................................................................................3-2 a) Establishing a Lead Agency......................................................................................................................3-2 b) Determination of Significance ..................................................................................................................3-2 c) Scoping .........................................................................................................................................................3-3 d) Preparation of the DGEIS ..........................................................................................................................3-3 e) Public Review..............................................................................................................................................3-4 f) Preparation and Completion of the FGEIS.............................................................................................3-4 g) Statement of Findings.................................................................................................................................3-4 h) Summary of SEQRA/CEQR Schedule ....................................................................................................3-5 C. COORDINATION WITH OTHER REVIEW PROCESSES.............................................3-5 1. UNIFORM LAND USE REVIEW PROCEDURE (ULURP)...................................................3-5 2. WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION..................................................................................3-6 3. EMINENT DOMAIN (CONDEMNATION) .........................................................................3-6 4. GENERAL PROJECT PLANS..........................................................................................3-7 D. LIST OF PRINCIPAL ACTIONS...................................................................................3-8 1. REZONING AND RELATED LAND USE ACTIONS.............................................................3-8 2. NO. 7 SUBWAY EXTENSION.........................................................................................3-8 3. CONVENTION CENTER EXPANSION..............................................................................3-8 4. MULTI-USE FACILITY.................................................................................................3-9 E. FRAMEWORK FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSES................................................3-9 1. SCOPE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS........................................................................3-9 2. REASONABLE WORST-CASE DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO (RWCDS).............................. 3-10 3. ANALYSIS YEARS..................................................................................................... 3-20 a) 2010.............................................................................................................................................................3-20 b) 2025.............................................................................................................................................................3-20 c) Construction Periods.................................................................................................................................3-21 4. DEFINITION OF PROJECT AREA.................................................................................. 3-21 5. DEFINITION OF STUDY AREAS................................................................................... 3-22 6. DEFINITION OF THE FUTURE WITHOUT THE PROPOSED ACTION, 2010 AND 2025 .......... 3-22 a) Relationship to Other Project Area Actions.........................................................................................3-23 7. ALTERNATIVES ........................................................................................................ 3-24 3-i No. 7 Subway Extension—Hudson Yards Rezoning and Development Program FGEIS LIST OF TABLES TABLE 3-1 PROJECTED RESIDENTIAL POPULATION AND HOUSING UNITS.................................................................3-12 TABLE 3-2 RESIDENTIAL UNITS IN THE PROJECT AREA ................................................................................................3-13 TABLE 3-3 DEVELOPMENT UNDER CONSTRUCTION OR PROPOSED OUTSIDE THE PROJECT AREA EXPECTED TO BE COMPLETED IN THE FUTURE WITHOUT THE PROPOSED ACTION.........................................................3-14 TABLE 3-4 2010 PROJECTED DEVELOPMENT SITES WITHOUT MSG RELOCATION ..................................................3-15 TABLE 3-5 2025 PROJECTED DEVELOPMENT SITES WITHOUT MSG RELOCATION ..................................................3-16 TABLE 3-6 2010 PROJECTED DEVELOPMENT SITES WITH MSG RELOCATION.........................................................3-17 TABLE 3-7 2025 PROJECTED DEVELOPMENT SITES WITH MSG RELOCATION.........................................................3-18 TABLE 3-8 DEVELOPMENT UNDER CONSTRUCTION OR PROPOSED IN THE PROJECT AREA AND PRIMARY STUDY AREA, EXPECTED TO BE COMPLETED IN THE FUTURE WITHOUT THE PROPOSED ACTION..............3-19 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 3-1 PROJECT AREA 3-ii Chapter 3: Analytical Framework A. INTRODUCTION The No. 7 Subway Extension—Hudson Yards Rezoning and Redevelopment Program is a multifaceted and far-reaching public initiative to create the development opportunities necessary to help sustain economic growth in New York City (the City). The size and scope of the Proposed Action have led to the determination that the Proposed Action may generate significant environmental impacts and, as a result, that a comprehensive Final Generic Environmental Impact Statement (FGEIS) should be prepared. A Generic EIS (GEIS) is an appropriate vehicle to evaluate environmental impacts of a proposed program, such as the Proposed Action, having wide applications, including new or significant changes to existing land use plans, development plans, and zoning regulations. This chapter outlines the procedural framework utilized to comply with environmental review regulations and identifies the necessary approvals, actions, and schedule to implement the Proposed Action. In addition, the chapter provides an overview of the analytical framework used to guide the GEIS technical analyses presented in subsequent chapters of this document. B. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS All agencies of government at the State, County, and local level within New York, except the State Legislature and the courts, must comply with the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA). The City has further promulgated local regulations, the City Environmental Quality Review (CEQR), to specifically implement the SEQRA for actions within the City, to take into account the special circumstances of the City. To understand the environmental consequences of their decision-making, and to afford the public an opportunity to participate in identifying such consequences, all discretionary decisions of an agency to approve, fund, or directly undertake an action are subject to review under the SEQRA/CEQR, unless explicitly excluded or exempted under the regulations. Discretionary decisions involve choices to be made by the decision-makers that determine whether and how an action (as described in Chapter 2, “Description of the Proposed Action”) is to be taken. Non-discretionary or ministerial decisions for which the only determination of an action’s approval is verification of compliance with specific and pre-determined criteria (e.g., issuance of a building permit) are not subject to the SEQRA/CEQR. Discretionary actions by numerous agencies would be required for the Proposed Action. As set forth below, the SEQRA/CEQR process for this FGEIS follows a prescribed path, to enable the agencies to make informed decisions. 1. Legislative Applicability This document has been prepared pursuant to the SEQRA, Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, and its implementing regulations (6 NYCRR Part 617) and CEQR requirements as established in Executive Order No. 90, 1977, and as set forth in its implementing Rules and Procedures, Title 62, Chapter 5, of the Rules of the City of New York. 2. Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS) This document has been prepared under the regulatory framework for GEISs. As described above, this framework is appropriate for decisions relating to multiple and broad actions that often cover a 3-1 No. 7 Subway Extension—Hudson Yards Rezoning and Development Program FGEIS large geographic area. In particular, the reason for preparing a GEIS under the guidelines of the SEQRA and CEQR is that there are multiple decisions associated with the Proposed Action, not all of which may be fully implemented as currently anticipated, and because some of the actions encompass a broad land area. The studies contained in this FGEIS: provide analysis criteria and assessments that enable the decision-makers to understand
Load more

Recommended publications
  • C:\Myfiles\Bush Tower\C 030192 ZSM.Wpd
    CITY PLANNING COMMISSION September 10, 2003/Calendar No. 20 C 030192 ZSM IN THE MATTER OF an application submitted by SAMA, LLC pursuant to Sections 197-c and 201 of the New York City Charter for the grant of a special permit pursuant to Section 74-711 of the Zoning Resolution to modify the requirements of: 1. Sections 81-25 and 81-27 to allow the reduction of the required daylight evaluation score; 2. Sections 77-02 and 77-22 to allow the requirements of Article 7, Chapter 7 to apply to the proposed zoning lot and to allow the distribution of floor area without regard to the maximum floor area allowed in each portion of the zoning lot divided by district boundaries; 3. Sections 37-071 and 37-073 to allow a reduction in the required amount and the required minimum depth of the required pedestrian circulation space; 4. Section 81-42 to allow an increase in the maximum allowed street frontage occuped by lobby space; 5. Section 81-72 to allow a redution of the required amount of street frontage occupied by Use Group T uses; and 6. Section 36-62 to waive the requirement for one loading berth; to facilitate the construction of a 23-story commercial building on a zoning lot located at 140 West 42nd Street (Block 994, Lots 16,45,47,49 and 148), in C6-7 and C5-2.5 Districts, within the Special Midtown District (Theater Subdistrict), Community District 5, Borough of Manhattan. The application for the special permit was filed by SAMA, LLC on November 6, 2002, to facilitate the construction of a 23-story office building containing approximately 143,000 square feet.
    [Show full text]
  • Borough Hall Skyscraper Historic District Designation Report
    Cover Photograph: Court Street looking south along Skyscraper Row towards Brooklyn City Hall, now Brooklyn Borough Hall (1845-48, Gamaliel King) and the Brooklyn Municipal Building (1923-26, McKenzie, Voorhees & Gmelin). Christopher D. Brazee, 2011 Borough Hall Skyscraper Historic District Designation Report Prepared by Christopher D. Brazee Edited by Mary Beth Betts, Director of Research Photographs by Christopher D. Brazee Map by Jennifer L. Most Technical Assistance by Lauren Miller Commissioners Robert B. Tierney, Chair Pablo E. Vengoechea, Vice-Chair Frederick Bland Christopher Moore Diana Chapin Margery Perlmutter Michael Devonshire Elizabeth Ryan Joan Gerner Roberta Washington Michael Goldblum Kate Daly, Executive Director Mark Silberman, Counsel Sarah Carroll, Director of Preservation TABLE OF CONTENTS BOROUGH HALL SKYSCRAPER HISTORIC DISTRICT MAP ................... FACING PAGE 1 TESTIMONY AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ................................................................................ 1 BOROUGH HALL SKYSCRAPER HISTORIC DISTRICT BOUNDARIES ............................. 1 SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................... 3 THE HISTORICAL AND ARCHITECTURAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BOROUGH HALL SKYSCRAPER HISTORIC DISTRICT ........................................................................................ 5 Early History and Development of Brooklyn‟s Civic Center ................................................... 5 Mid 19th Century Development
    [Show full text]
  • Summary for World Conference
    World Conference FILE, 016545 PART OF: PHOTOGRAPH COLLECTION > MEETINGS AND EVENTS > WORLD CONFERENCE Collection Contents World Conference (57 records) Juliette Gordon Low speaking to a group of ten Girl Scouts and Adult Leaders beside an encampment of tents. Group portrait of approximately thirty Girl Scouts and Adult Leaders in three rows. Juliette Gordon Low in center. Cottage in background and an American flag. A group of several dozen Girl Scouts and Adult Leaders watch as Juliette Gordon Low digs with a shovel to plant a memorial evergreen sapling. Silver Fish award is shown around her neck. A group of three Adult Leaders plant a memorial tree while other leaders and Girl Scouts observe. Juliette Gordon Low is on far right. Portrait of a group of approximately forty International Adult Leaders in three rows in front of a building. Two American GS Leaders are shown. Portrait of a group of over one hundred International Adult Leaders in several rows in front of a building. Some American GS Leaders are shown. Five International Adult Leaders on the lawn at a conference. An audience in lawn chairs watches an International Girl Scout presentation of troops in formation with Danish flags. High angle view. An audience in lawn chairs at the 18th World Conference. Front Row: King Frederick IX of Denmark with two of his daughters; Princess Benedikte and Anne-Marie Closeup of King Frederick IX of Denmark with two of his daughters; Princess Benedikte and Anne-Marie at the 18th World Conference. Closeup portrait of Princess Benedikte of Denmark standing at a microphone.
    [Show full text]
  • February 2008
    CITYLAND FEBRUARY 15, 2008 center for new york city law VOLUME 5, NUMBER 1 Highlights CITY COUNCIL Eberhard Faber Hist. Dist. .1 Columbia, CB 9 saga ends . .3 Tuck-it-Away approved . .4 Council takes on MSG . .4 Kaufman Astoria Studios . .5 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION Solow, CB 6 plans modified . .6 Hudson Square rezoning . .7 Hotel in Lincoln Square . .8 Park Slope BID OK'd . .9 Hunts Point Special District . .9 BOARD OF STANDARDS & APPEALS Dyker Heights end-around . .10 Local residents lost a lawsuit seeking to stop the Atlantic Yards project from moving forward. See story Avella challenges variance . .10 on page 16. Image: Forest City Ratner Companies. Faith trumps zoning . .10 LANDMARKS CITY COUNCIL struction of a nine-story addition to, and interior demolition of, 58 Kent DUMBO Hist. Dist. designated . .11 Street. 4 CityLand109 (Aug. 15, 2007). Designation Ladies' Mile glass tower app’d . .12 Notwithstanding the permits, Land- Allerton House public hearing . .13 Greenpoint, Brooklyn marks voted to preserve the Eber- 97-yr.-old synagogue considered .13 Council OKs Eberhard Faber hard Faber buildings as a historic dis- Cobble Hill project rejected . .14 Pencil Hist. Dist. trict in October 2007. 4 CityLand 159 American Bank Note Co. .14 (Oct. 15, 2007). Historic district includes buildings ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP. At the Subcommittee on Land- from Brooklyn’s bygone industrial marks, Public Siting & Maritime Uses Harlem firehouse for sale, $1 . .15 age. On January 30, 2008, the City hearing on January 22, 2008, Diane COURT DECISIONS Council voted to approve Land- Jackier, Director of External Affairs marks’ designation of the Eberhard for Landmarks, testified in support Atlantic Yards Art.
    [Show full text]
  • Bfm:978-1-56898-652-4/1.Pdf
    Manhattan Skyscrapers Manhattan Skyscrapers REVISED AND EXPANDED EDITION Eric P. Nash PHOTOGRAPHS BY Norman McGrath INTRODUCTION BY Carol Willis PRINCETON ARCHITECTURAL PRESS NEW YORK PUBLISHED BY Princeton Architectural Press 37 East 7th Street New York, NY 10003 For a free catalog of books, call 1.800.722.6657 Visit our website at www.papress.com © 2005 Princeton Architectural Press All rights reserved Printed and bound in China 08 07 06 05 4 3 2 1 No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner without written permission from the publisher, except in the context of reviews. The publisher gratefully acknowledges all of the individuals and organizations that provided photographs for this publi- cation. Every effort has been made to contact the owners of copyright for the photographs herein. Any omissions will be corrected in subsequent printings. FIRST EDITION DESIGNER: Sara E. Stemen PROJECT EDITOR: Beth Harrison PHOTO RESEARCHERS: Eugenia Bell and Beth Harrison REVISED AND UPDATED EDITION PROJECT EDITOR: Clare Jacobson ASSISTANTS: John McGill, Lauren Nelson, and Dorothy Ball SPECIAL THANKS TO: Nettie Aljian, Nicola Bednarek, Janet Behning, Penny (Yuen Pik) Chu, Russell Fernandez, Jan Haux, Clare Jacobson, John King, Mark Lamster, Nancy Eklund Later, Linda Lee, Katharine Myers, Jane Sheinman, Scott Tennent, Jennifer Thompson, Paul G. Wagner, Joe Weston, and Deb Wood of Princeton Architectural Press —Kevin Lippert, Publisher LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGING-IN-PUBLICATION DATA Nash, Eric Peter. Manhattan skyscrapers / Eric P. Nash ; photographs by Norman McGrath ; introduction by Carol Willis.—Rev. and expanded ed. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 1-56898-545-2 (alk.
    [Show full text]
  • Manhattan Office Market
    Manhattan Offi ce Market 2 ND QUARTER 2015 REPORT A NEWS RECAP AND MARKET SNAPSHOT Pictured: 1001 Avenue of the Americas Looking Ahead Partnership for New York City: New York’s Future as the World Financial Capital The report released in June concluded that while New York City remains the preferred location of global fi nancial companies to establish their headquarters, there is a growing trend to relocate jobs and business operations to lower cost, more business-friendly locations that are beyond the city’s border. A comprehensive survey was conducted in collaboration with Gerson Lehrman Group (GRG), intending to better understand how the fi nancial industry is evolving; and what measures are required to solidify New York’s competitive advantage as a global fi nancial center. Collected data represents an overview of the responses from 50-fi rm respondents that included large banks, insurance companies and asset managers, private equity fi rms, hedge funds, and fi nancial technology (FinTech) startups; and represent about 1/3rd of the total industry employment in the city. Additionally, observations were included from 8-real estate fi rms that were surveyed; along with interviews from other related experts in the fi eld. Financial Industry – an economic snapshot • Contributes 20% of the city’s economic output, representing twice that of the next top-grossing industry. • Accounts for nearly 1/3rd of the city’s private sector payroll, despite accounting for only 8%, or about 310,000 of the city’s private sector jobs in 2013; of which 23,000 jobs are high-technology in the areas of software, data processing and network management.
    [Show full text]
  • CITYLAND NEW FILINGS & DECISIONS | June 2018
    CITYLAND NEW FILINGS & DECISIONS | June 2018 CITY PLANNING PIPELINE New Applications Filed with DCP — June 1 to June 30, 2018 APPLICANT PROJECT/ADDRESS DESCRIPTION ULURP NO. REPRESENTATIVE ZONING TEXT AND MAP AMENDMENTS Merrick Capital 2 Howard Avenue Rezoning This is a private application for zoning map and text amendments 180516 EASK Corp. to facilitate the development of a new 6-story, 36,000 sq. ft., mixed-use building containing 30 dwelling units and ground floor retail at 2 Howard Avenue in Brooklyn, by changing the existing R6B/C2-4 district to a C4-4L district and creat Denis S. O’Connor, 91-05 Beach Channel Drive Zoning map amendment from R4-1 to R4-1/C2-3 to bring 180504 EASQ Inc. Rezoning an existing funeral home establishment (Use Group 7) into conformance with the Zoning Resolution Josh Weisstuch Marcus Garvey Apartments This is a private application by Brownsville Livonia Associates C180485 HAK; LSGD LLC for a zoning map amendment, zoning text amendment, zoning C180486 PCK; special permit, and a large scale general development special C180489 ZMK; permit to facilitate the development of seven new eight- and nine- N180487 ZRK; story mixed use buildings containing 724 affordable 180490 ZSK; C180488 ZSK 41 Summit Street 41 Summit Street Rezoning This is a private application by 41 Summit Street LLC requesting I180294 ZMK; LLC rezoning from M1-1 to R7A/C2-4 and mapping MIH (ZR Appendix N180295 ZRK F) to facilitate the construction of a seven-story residential building with seven dwelling units at 41 Summit Street in the Columbia Street Waterfront neighborhood, Community Dist WEST 16-22 ST W 22nd - W 23rd St Coney Rezoning from R5 to R7D/C2-4 with MIH to facilitate the I170458 ZMK; PROPERTIES LLC Island Rezoning development of a new 6 and 13 story mixed use building with 78 N170459 ZRK units in Coney Island.
    [Show full text]
  • Terry Helgesen Collection
    152 N. York St., 2nd Floor, Elmhurst, IL 60126 historictheatres.org Finding Aid for the TERRY HELGESEN COLLECTION Acc. #: xx-005 Future Additions Expected: No Finding Aid creation: August 17, 2010 Size: 10.5 linear feet (approx.) Abstract The Terry Helgesen Collection contains 26 oversize scrapbooks, some correspondence, several draft chapters of a book on theatres, and an oil painting of a young Terry Helgesen. The scrapbooks consist of photographs and drawings of theatres collected by THS member Terry Helgesen with his descriptions of the theatres and other information such as number of seats, architect, opening and closing dates, renovation and demolition dates, and other notable facts. Background Information Terry Helgesen (1914-1995) was a pianist who played on stage in the waning days of presentation houses (a short stage show followed by a movie) as well as in nightclubs. Terry was also a THS Founding member and the 1979 Member of the Year. He was born in Seattle, WA but his family moved to Santa Barbara, CA when he was still very young. He was tutored in piano by Roger Clerbois and Joseph Hoffman, among others. Terry entered vaudeville (variety entertainment with a mixture of comedy, song and dance) in a “tyke” act called “Terry and Ty” with Terry playing a miniature piano and Ty doing a quick-step. Though Terry started as part of an act, he later changed to accompaniment and played on the Orpheum, Fanchon & Marco and Publix circuits. During his travels he sought out newspapers and photographers who had images of theatres which he purchased and assembled into scrapbooks.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Extend Tribeca North Historic District?
    Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................... 2 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW ......................................................................................................... 4 PART 1: WHY EXTEND TRIBECA NORTH HISTORIC DISTRICT? ............................................... 5 PREVIOUS EFFORTS TO EXTEND TRIBECA NORTH ................................................................................................. 8 PART 2: NORTH TRIBECA HISTORY ................................................................................................ 12 PART 2: BLOCK AND LOTS MERITING INCLUSION IN TRIBECA NORTH HISTORIC DISTRICT .................................................................................................................................................... 35 530 CANAL, BLOCK 595, LOT 11 ........................................................................................................................... 35 528 CANAL STREET, BLOCK 595, LOT 14 ............................................................................................................ 36 472 WASHINGTON (BLOCK 595, PART OF LOT 14) ........................................................................................... 37 466 WASHINGTON (BLOCK 595, LOT 16) ........................................................................................................... 38 470 WASHINGTON STREET LOT 22 (NOW DEMOLISHED) ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CEQR Project Milestones
    CEQR Project Milestones CEQR Project Name Milestone Name 09DCP036M 246 Eleventh Avenue Negative Declaration 94BSA034Q Lucille Roberts Fitness Center EAS 19TLC003X Premium Bronx Corp. Negative Declaration 94BSA037Q Lucille Roberts Fitness Center Revised EAS 09DCP048M Fountain House Lead Agency Letter 13BSA002K 910 Manhattan Avenue Negative Declaration 03FDO001Q Acquisition of Accessory Parking Lot for Engine 306, Negative Declaration Bayside Queens 09DCP035Y Waterfront Zoning Text Amendment Negative Declaration 94BSA018Q 150-24 Northern Boulevard EAS 92-051X 2428-2434 Eastchester Avenue Negative Declaration 12BSA002K 1152 East 24th Type II Memo 93DBS005K Pitkin Avenue BID Negative Declaration 03BSA046M 19 East 94th Street Begin Additional Review 09TLC014K Red Hook Car & Limo Service Lead Agency Letter 96DCP047R Amboy Road Shopping Center Lead Agency Letter 09DHS008M The Ping Residence Negative Declaration 93DEP025K Sewer Maintenance Yard EAS 09DCP005M The Axton West Side Urban Renewal Area LSRD Technical Memorandum Modification 06DCP026K Homecrest Rezoning Negative Declaration Page 1 of 506 09/24/2021 CEQR Project Milestones Milestone Date 05/04/2009 07/05/2018 07/06/1994 03/31/2009 01/08/2013 09/02/2003 12/11/2008 01/01/1993 11/15/2011 10/01/1992 02/06/2007 11/13/2008 05/01/1996 09/11/2009 08/18/1992 03/23/2012 09/26/2005 Page 2 of 506 09/24/2021 CEQR Project Milestones 11TLC034K Morenita Express Car Service Inc. Lead Agency Letter 08DME007K Coney Island Rezoning Technical Memorandum 18DEP037Q Demolition of Water Tanks at Station 24 Negative
    [Show full text]
  • Master Building and the Proposed Designation of the Related Landmark Site (Item No
    landmarks Preservation Conunission December 5, 1989; Designation List 222 IP-1661 MASTER BUIIDING, 310-312 Riverside Drive, Borough of Manhattan. Built 1928- 29; architect Harvey Wiley Corbett of the finn of Helmle, Corbett & Harrison with sugarrnan & Berger, associated architects. landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 1890, IDt 40. On April 19, 1988, the landmarks Preservation Conunission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a landmark of the Master Building and the proposed designation of the related landmark site (Item No. 11). '!he hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Eleven witnesses spoke in favor of designation, and one expressed uncertainty. '!he owners and tenants, at the time of the public hearing, were unsure about their position on designation due to the impending conversion of the property to a ccx:>peratively--avvned building. '!he ccx:>p board has since that time communicated to the Conunission a position in favor of designation. DESCRIPI'ION AND ANALYSIS 'Ihe Master Building, erected in 1928-29 to house an apartment hotel and musellltl, is an innovative and significant example of the work of Harvey Wiley Corbett, an architect influential in skyscraper design, and expresses his successful employment of sculptural massing, vertical emphasis, and the minbn.3.1, yet elegant, use of surface ornamentation and historically-inspired detailing. '!he design of the building includes many strong and well- integrated features representative of the best of New York City's Art Deco style skyscrapers, including patterned brickwork which varies in color from dark at the base to light at the tower, setbacks, irregular and faceted massing of the upper stories, and an ornamental cap.
    [Show full text]
  • Valerie G. Campbell
    Valerie G. Campbell Partner New York T 212.715.9183 F 212.715.8252 [email protected] Valerie Campbell advises residential and commercial developers, property owners and non-profit, cultural, religious and educational institutions in land use, zoning, historic preservation and environmental matters in connection with major projects throughout New York City. Valerie’s work includes new developments, expansions and enlargements, and adaptive reuse and alterations in historic districts or areas adjacent to individual landmarks. Previously general counsel to the New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission and deputy counsel to the New York City Department of Parks and Recreation, Valerie brings extensive practical knowledge and experience, from both the private and public perspectives, to her work. She guides clients through the complex regulatory processes at the Department of City Planning, the Board of Standards and Appeals, and the Landmarks Preservation Commission, helping shape applications that win project approvals and avoid costly and delaying public hearings. Her work also includes advising clients on compliance with the federal Americans with Disabilities Act and negotiating and drafting complex development rights transfer agreements. Valerie dedicates significant time to pro bono representations. Most recently she advised Broadway Housing Communities in obtaining a rezoning and other land use approvals for a project in Harlem that includes 124 affordable housing units, the Sugar Hill Museum Preschool and Sugar Hill Museum of Art and Storytelling. Experience Represented a major design-build developer in obtaining Landmarks Preservation Commission, Board of Standards and Appeal, and City Planning Commission approvals for new buildings in SoHo, Tribeca and Noho historic districts. Cultural Institutions: Land use counsel to The Frick Collection, the Brooklyn Museum, the New York Historical Society and Carnegie Hall in connection with obtaining Landmarks Preservation Commission approvals for major expansion projects.
    [Show full text]