Assessing Behavioral Targeting: Notes from the FTC Workshop [email protected]

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Assessing Behavioral Targeting: Notes from the FTC Workshop Ecividanes@Venable.Com VOLUME 2, NUMBER 6 DECEMBER 5, 2007 Editors Welcome to a special issue of the Download, which covers the recent FTC “Town Hall” workshop on behavioral marketing entitled Ehavioral Advertising: Tracking, Targeting & Technology. What follows Alisa M. Bergman below is an executive summary of the workshop. A complete recap of the Town Hall can be found 202.344.4611 [email protected] beginning on page 4. Emilio W. Cividanes 202.344.4414 Assessing Behavioral Targeting: Notes From the FTC Workshop [email protected] Stuart P. Ingis On November 1-2, 2007, the FTC conducted a “Town Hall” on behavioral targeting online, 202.344.4613 the practice of delivering targeted advertising to online consumers. The event, Ehavioral [email protected] Advertising: Tracking, Targeting, & Technology, included nine panels composed of representatives from a number of leading online companies, government officials, and privacy advocates discussing the topic from the perspectives of technology, self-regulation, privacy Washington, D.C. 575 7th Street, NW advocacy and industry. Washington, DC 20004-1601 202.344.4000 C A L I F O R N ia • M A RY la N D • N E W Y O R K • V I R GI N I A • W A SH I N G T O N , D C Where We Are Today Baltimore Two Hopkins Plaza The first session, an “Overview of Behavioral Advertising”, set the stage for the issues which Baltimore, MD 21201 would be addressed over the course of the workshop. One panelist highlighted the fact that 410.244.7400 the concept of behavioral advertising stretches back to the days of the Montgomery Ward Los Angeles catalog of the late 19th century, which was mailed to a targeted list of rural consumers with 2049 Century Park East a known proclivity to purchase the goods advertised within its pages. The advent of online Los Angeles, CA 90067 retailing and the desire to provide an improved user experience replete with fresh, free content th 575 7 Street, NW 310.229.9900 and relevant ads have spurred the evolution of innovative new technology. With this innovation Washington, DC 20004-1601 New York comes many new opportunities for retailers—such as geographic-based targeting, keyword- 405 Lexington Avenue triggered advertising, and cookie-based targeting. These technologies have also been the New York, NY 10174 focus of many questions centered around consumer privacy, the regulatory environment of 212.307.5500 such practices, and the ways in which companies are adapting their business models in order to assure their customers of these legitimate practices and succeed within this constantly Rockville One Church Street shifting framework. Fifth Floor Rockville, MD 20850 A more in-depth discussion of the current state of online advertising followed, with 301.217.5600 representatives from various companies and organizations discussing their practices and thoughts on the evolving models. The ability to participate in effective online advertising Towson 210 Allegheny Avenue practices is crucial to many online retailers and content providers. Citing a study from April Towson, MD 21204 2006, it was noted that not only do a majority of consumers say that they pay more attention 410.494.6200 to advertising geared specifically towards them, but that their online experiences are improved by such practices. Beyond that, there is a general expectation from consumers of quality, free Tysons 8010 Towers Crescent Drive Vienna, VA 22182 703.760.1600 VALUE ADDED. VALUES DRIVEN. VALUE ADDED. VALUES DRIVEN. THE DOWNLOAD DECEMBER 5, 2007 2 THE DOWNLOAD DECEMBER 5, 2007 23 content on the web—something that is enhanced by the increasing efficacy of targeted binary equation of ad or no ad—rather, the issue is an ad to whom and from whom. He noted advertising and the associated revenue it brings to sites. In other words, so-called that the ad process will not be top-down only in the future. Users will receive ads and information “behavioral targeting” is now an inextricable component of online success. from their neighbors and friends as well. “It’s All About the Consumer” Trust but verify—how can we encourage trust? John Thorne of Verizon stated that consumers respond to different levels of privacy. He provided examples of how customers voted Two researchers—George R. Milne from the University of Massachusetts-Amherst with their feet and joined Verizon in the wake of other companies’ proposals to make available a cell phone directory, as well as ISPs’ practices in connection with responding to subpoenas. and Dr. Larry Ponemon of the Ponemon Institute—shared their findings on a broad He stated that privacy is important and that consumers distinguish among companies based on reaching survey related to consumer expectations and concerns related to behavioral privacy. Mr. Thompson stated that it is difficult to pursue bad actors. The real challenge, he said, marketing practices. In general, they found that consumers have a desire to control both will be to create a race to the top because businesses find it easier to deal with mediocrity. their online experience (i.e. through “opt-in” and “opt-out” options, blocking pop-ups, etc.) as well as the information which they share. The vast majority of consumers identified in the study stated that their privacy concerns extended only in so far as they were Closing Remarks—Eileen Harrington, Deputy Director, Bureau of Consumer not inconvenienced by the issue. Using this information, the researchers were able to Protection, FTC present opportunities for building trust with online consumers, including such practices as the effective maintenance of an online privacy policy, and appropriate placement of ads Summing up the Town Hall discussions, Ms. Harrington of the FTC made the following and uses of information. observations: Data Collection Practices (1) Behavioral advertising is a growing practice that is largely invisible; (2) There is general agreement that greater transparency and control is needed; (3) There are legitimate concerns about what happens to information. Among these concerns From there, the workshop moved towards a discussion of the policies that companies are secondary uses of information and data security issues, particularly where sensitive data is have in place regarding the collection, use and protection of data about consumers. involved. Panelists discussed the idea of “privacy by design” which is, in effect, the building of (4) The FTC wants a reasonable approach, which is flexible, provides consumers with control, privacy mechanisms directly into a company’s products. These mechanisms include prevents harm and creates greater accountability. such features as allowing consumers to control what information is shared, opt-in/opt-out features, requiring an authentication before using personalized services (such as email), She discussed some of the promising ideas, which include a Do-Not-Track List, updates to the and the collection of non-personally identifying information. NAI principles, and better consumer education. Ms. Harrington indicated that the FTC has not seen enough of the facts surrounding information collection for behavioral targeting. She also The central concerns involving the collection of data centered around the amount and stated that there is a lack of concrete suggestions about improving consumer protections. Finally, type of data collected, the effect this data has on the choices provided to consumers, and she stated that the FTC will continue to ask questions about these issues. the length of time the data is stored. Moving Forward on Disclosure With the foundation for the town hall now set—what behavioral targeting is, its uses, THE DOWNLOAD is published by the privacy team at the law firm of Venable LLP. Internet ad- benefits and potential drawbacks—the second day of the program centered around ways dress: http://www.venable.com. It is not intended to provide legal advice or opinion. Such advice to move forward, and how the government and private industry can effectively preserve may only be given when related to specific fact situations. Copyright enableV LLP 2007. the benefits of behavioral marketing while mitigating privacy concerns. Issue Editor: Stuart P. Ingis In the realm of consumer notification, companies are experimenting with various ways Associate Editor: Katharine A. Pauley in which to notify consumers about behavioral advertising policies. Striking a balance between providing meaningful, accessible information without overburdening the Questions and comments concerning information in this newsletter should be directed to Stuart consumer is key to effective notification. Businesses are accomplishing this in a myriad Ingis at [email protected]. of ways, including allowing consumers to curate their own profiles to dictate how much information is shared (and to whom), layered notices, color-coded notices and symbols, Please direct requests to be added to the distribution list or address changes to Kay Pauley at and even posting videos describing company privacy policies on YouTube. [email protected]. VALUE ADDED. VALUES DRIVEN. VALUE ADDED. VALUES DRIVEN. 3 THE DOWNLOAD DECEMBER 5, 2007 22 THE DOWNLOAD DECEMBER 5, 2007 3 world cookies), loyalty cards, passports, to assign a value to consumers as they The Cookie Question enter retail stores, future plans to use the technology in connection with offering bank patrons differential treatment, on billboards to target people and to scan The ensuing session involved one of the most discussed aspects of behavioral targeting: the use tags in garbage (to determine how quickly people consume particular products). of cookies. Ms. Albrecht stated that this is extraordinarily harmful to consumers. Cookies are a critical component of today’s Internet. Following the showing of a series of short Mozelle Thompson, CEO, , stated that there Thompson Strategic Consulting videos on the function of cookies produced by contestants participating in a contest sponsored by is a lingering, but incorrect, impression that the public is dumb; they may be the Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard Law School, a panel convened to discuss misinformed or uninformed, but they make choices about privacy.
Recommended publications
  • Liberation Technology Conference Bios
    1 Liberation Technology in Authoritarian Regimes October 11‐12, 2010 Bechtel Conference Center, Encina Hall, Stanford University Conference Attendees’ Bios Esra’a Al Shafei, MideastYouth.com Esra'a Al Shafei is the founder and Executive Director of MideastYouth.com, a grassroots, indigenous digital network that leverages the power of new media to facilitate the struggle against oppression in the Middle East and North Africa. She is a recipient of the Berkman Award from Harvard University's Berkman Center for Internet and Society for "outstanding contributions to the internet and its impact on society," and is currently a TED Fellow and an Echoing Green Fellow. Most recently, her project won a ThinkSocial Award for serving as a "powerful model for how social media can be used to address global problems." Walid Al‐Saqaf, Yemen Portal Walid AL‐SAQAF is a Yemeni activist, software engineer and scholar concerned with studying Internet censorship around the world, but with a special focus on the Middle East. During 1999‐ 2005, he held the position of publisher and editor‐in‐chief of Yemen Times, which was founded by his father in 1990 and since 2009, he has been a PhD candidate at Örebro University in Sweden, where he also teaches online investigative journalism. In 2010, he won a TED fellowship and the Democracy award of Örebro University for his research and activism in promoting access to information and for fighting cyber censorship. Among his notable works is Yemen Portal (https://yemenportal.net), which is a news aggregator focused on content on Yemen and alkasir (https://alkasir.com), a unique censorship circumvention software solution that allows Internet users around the world to access websites blocked by regimes.
    [Show full text]
  • Reverse-Engineering Twitter's Content Removal
    “We Believe in Free Expression...” Reverse-Engineering Twitter’s Content Removal Policies for the Alt-Right The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:38811534 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Contents The Problem & The Motivation .............................................................................. 4 Free Speech: Before and After the Internet ......................................................... 5 Speech on Twitter .............................................................................................. 11 Defining the Alt-Right ....................................................................................... 13 The Alt-Right on Social Media ......................................................................... 14 Social Media Reaction to Charlottesville .......................................................... 17 Twitter’s Policies for the Alt-Right ................................................................... 19 Previous Work ................................................................................................... 21 Structure of this Thesis .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • New York Times: Free Speech Lawyering in the Age of Google and Twitter
    THE “NEW” NEW YORK TIMES: FREE SPEECH LAWYERING IN THE AGE OF GOOGLE AND TWITTER Marvin Ammori INTRODUCTION When Ben Lee was at Columbia Law School in the 1990s, he spent three months as a summer associate at the law firm then known as Lord, Day & Lord, which had represented the New York Times1 in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan.2 During those months, Lee listened to the firm’s elder partners recount gripping tales of the Sullivan era and depict their role in the epic speech battles that shaped the future of free expression. Hearing these stories, a young Lee dreamed that one day he too would participate in the country’s leading speech battles and have a hand in writing the next chapter in freedom of expression. When I met with Lee in August 2013, forty-nine years after Sulli- van, he was working on freedom of expression as the top lawyer at Twitter. Twitter and other Internet platforms have been heralded for creating the “new media,”3 what Professor Yochai Benkler calls the “networked public sphere,”4 for enabling billions around the world to publish and read instantly, prompting a world where anyone — you and I included — can be the media simply by breaking, recounting, or spreading news and commentary.5 Today, freedom of the press means ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Fellow, New America Foundation; Partner, the Ammori Group. The Ammori Group is an “opinionated law firm” dedicated to advancing freedom of expression and Internet freedom, and its clients have included Google, Dropbox, Automattic, Twitter, and Tumblr. The author would like to thank Alvaro Bedoya, Yochai Benkler, Monika Bickert, Nick Bramble, Alan Davidson, Tony Falzone, Mike Godwin, Ramsey Homsany, Marjorie Heins, Adam Kern, Ben Lee, Andrew McLaughlin, Luke Pelican, Jason Schulman, Aaron Schur, Paul Sieminski, Ari Shahdadi, Laura Van Dyke, Bart Volkmer, Dave Willner, and Jonathan Zittrain.
    [Show full text]
  • Wednesday October 4
    We offer 20 tracks to help you navigate the schedule. Like tracks are color coded for even easier exploration. CAREER ARTIFICIAL WEDNESDAY INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY OCTOBER 4 COMPUTER SYSTEMS CRA-W ENGINEERING STUDENT DATA SCIENCE OPPORTUNITY LAB HUMAN COMPUTER ACM RESEARCH INTERACTION COMPETITION INTERACTIVE MEDIA GENERAL POSTER SESSION SECURITY/PRIVACY GENERAL SESSION SOFTWARE ENGINEERING LUNCHES & RECEPTIONS OPEN SOURCE SPECIAL SESSIONS ORGANIZATION IOT / WEARABLE TECH TRANSFORMATION PRODUCTS A TO Z //////////////////////////////////////////////// TUESDAY, OCTOBER 3 / 5 - 6 p.m. GENERAL SESSION PRESENTATION First Timers Orientation OCCC W230C All NOTE: OCCC stands for the Orange County Convention Center #GHC17 DAY 1: WEDNESDAY #GHC17 DAY 1: WEDNESDAY //////////////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////////////// 9 - 10:30 a.m. 11 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. GENERAL SESSION CAREER Wednesday Keynote Interviews OCCC WA2 Melinda Gates OCCC WB3/4 (Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation), Fei-Fei Li //////////////////////////////////////////////// (Stanford University; Google Cloud) 11:30 a.m. - 12:30 p.m. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE PRESENTATIONS //////////////////////////////////////////////// 10:30 a.m. - 5:30 p.m. Presentations: AI for Social Good OCCC W304C Jennifer Marsman (Microsoft), CAREER EXPO Neelima Kumar (Oracle) Beginner/Intermediate Career Fair CAREER PANEL OCCC WA3/4 & WB1/2 All For Good and For Profit: Exploring Careers in SPECIAL SESSIONS Social Enterprise Speaker Lounge OCCC W305 All Hyatt Regency Ballroom V Hannah SPECIAL SESSIONS Calhoon (Blue Ridge Labs@Robin Hood), Kamla Kasichainula (Change.org), Erin Mote Faculty Lounge OCCC W209C Faculty (InnovateEDU), Morgan Berman (MilkCrate), Donnovan Andrews (Overture) All //////////////////////////////////////////////// 10:30 a.m. - 6 p.m. CAREER PANEL Women in Tech: Get a Seat @ the Table! SPECIAL SESSIONS Hyatt Regency Ballroom S Monique Student Lounge sponsored by D.E.
    [Show full text]
  • PCAST Meeting ‐ November 21, 2013
    PCAST Meeting ‐ November 21, 2013 Welcome & Education Information Technology (EdIT) Letter report >> John Holdren: I wonder if we could get going here. We're a couple of minutes behind, but not too far behind. Let me welcome the members of PCAST, the members of the OSTP leadership, and the PCAST secretariat from OSTP who are here and let me welcome the members of the wider science and technology community, who are joining us either in person or over the live streaming webcast, which is underway. We have as usual a full agenda. We'll be turning to it in just a moment. I just have one matter of celebration to note that's our PCAST member Mario Molina yesterday received from President Obama the Presidential Medal Of Freedom. I want to congratulate Mario. I believe with this award it can be safely said that there's no prizes left that Mario has not won, and therefore he can relax. Not likely. Eric, would you like to add any words of welcome. >> Eric Lander: I would like to welcome the whole PCAST including our two new members of the PCAST. We're very excited to have Michael McQuade and Susan Graham who is joining us in PCAST and we just have a lot of things going on. We're going to hear about two very exciting and important reports. So thank you everyone, as always, for the hard work and for being here. >> John Holdren: Let us turn straight to the business of the day and the first item on that agenda is for PCAST to discuss and approve the educational information technology MOOC focused letter report.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sky's Limit California
    THE SKY’S LIMIT CALIFORNIA: WHY THE PARIS CLIMATE GOALS DEMAND THAT CALIFORNIA LEAD IN A MANAGED DECLINE OF OIL EXTRACTION MAY 2018 In collaboration with This report was written and researched by Kelly Trout of Oil Change International, with additional research by Kyle Ferrar of FracTracker Alliance and David Hughes of Global Sustainability Research. It includes additional writing and research contributions from Janet Redman, Greg Muttitt, Hannah McKinnon, and David Turnbull, all of Oil Change International, Roger Lin of The Center on Race, Poverty & the Environment, and José López of Communities for a Better Environment. It was edited by Collin Rees of Oil Change International. Design adjustments by Matt Maiorana of Oil Change International. The authors are grateful for feedback from the following reviewers: Zoë Cina-Sklar and Kevin Koenig, Amazon Watch; Kassie Siegel, Maya Golden-Krasner, and Shaye Wolf, Center for Biological Diversity; Alvaro Palacios Casanova, Center for Environmental Health; Greg Karras, Communities for a Better Environment; Tim Donaghy, Greenpeace; Nicole J. Wong, MPH, Redeemer Community Partnership; Matt Krogh, Stand; Peter Erickson, Stockholm Environment Institute; Frank Ackerman, Synapse Energy Economics; Madeline Stano, The Greenlining Institute. Design: [email protected] Cover Image: John Ciccarelli, Bureau of Land Management May 2018. Published by Oil Change International (www.priceofoil.org), in collaboration with: 350.org http://www.350.org Amazon Watch http://amazonwatch.org Asian Pacific Environmental
    [Show full text]
  • How Technology Is Making Corporate Lawyers More Powerful Parts One and Two of a Two-Part Q&A with Jeffrey Rosen
    How Technology is Making Corporate Lawyers More Powerful Parts one and two of a two-part Q&A with Jeffrey Rosen Catherine Dunn Corporate Counsel December 8, 2011 A few years ago, The New York Times Magazine asked constitutional scholar and legal commentator Jeffrey Rosen to imagine the future of technology and law. His subsequent reporting produced a sense of how inadequate the U.S. Constitution is to deal with some of the challenges posed by technological advances in fields like genetic selection and surveillance. It also revealed the profound role of corporate legal departments—sometimes ahead of courts and judges—in making determinations about privacy and free speech. Those ideas are at the fore of Constitution 3.0: Freedom and Technological Change, a new compilation of essays edited by Jeffrey Rosen Rosen and Benjamin Wittes and published by The Brookings Institution. Rosen, a law professor at George Washington University and legal affairs editor at The New Republic, spoke with CorpCounsel.com about the book, legal battles to come, and how in-house counsel can have more power than the Supreme Court. Below is part one of an edited version of that conversation (see part two here). CorpCounsel: Given how much you had written on this topic, what surprised you about the essays in the book? Jeffrey Rosen: I was very struck when I read the finished collection, both by the creativity of the thinkers, and also by how much people disagreed about the appropriate regulatory, legal, and technological responses. Some people put a lot of emphasis on judicial doctrine as the best way to protect liberty.
    [Show full text]
  • Class Notes Newsletter Fall 2015
    Class Notes Newsletter Fall 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS WELCOME! Alumni Updates: 1970s Page 2 1980s Page 3 Over the past few months we collected over 275 professional and personal updates from Rossier alumni for our third issue of Class Notes. 1990s Page 4 If you would like to include an update for the spring issue, please complete the online alumni update survey. 2000s Page 8 To view past issues please visit our Class Notes website. 2010s Page 15 Fight On! Matt DeGrushe ME ’04 Director of Alumni Engagement FEATURE STORIES 2015 Rossier Commencement welcomes 700+ graduates to the Rossier Alumni Network L’Cena Brunskill Rice ’53 inducted into Half Century Trojan Hall of Fame Page 4 2015 Leadership Conference inspires audience of current and future leaders Page 5 Merrill Irving EdD ’07 Named President of Hennepin Technical College Page 9 Carlos Turner Cortez PhD ’06 Named President of San Diego Continuing Education Page 14 Rossier Alumni honored at USC Alumni Association Volunteer Recognition Dinner Page 30 USC Rossier School of Education, Office of Alumni Engagement | [email protected] | Page 1 Class Notes Newsletter Fall 2015 Bertie Wood MS '76 PhD '85 worked as a resource 1970s teacher for the English as a Second Language (ESL) and Adult Basic Education (ABE) programs at James “Jim” Hearn MS '73 EdD '90 is currently a Torrance Adult School (TAS) while working on her member of the Senior Executive Service (brigadier master's and doctorate. She continued in that general equivalent) with the US Army Corps of position until retirement in 1998 ending 25 years of Engineers, Northwestern Division.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Altschul Kevin Bankston Laura D. Berger
    Bios Michael Altschul Michael Altschul is the Cellular Telecommunications surveillance, and he is currently a lead counsel in Industry Association’s (CTIA) Senior Vice President EFF’s lawsuits against the National Security Agency and General Counsel. He is responsible for the (NSA) and AT&T challenging the legality of the Association’s legal advocacy and CTIA’s compliance NSA’s warrantless wiretapping program. Before with antitrust and other applicable laws. He is also joining EFF in 2003, he was the Justice Brennan an active participant in the development of the First Amendment Fellow at the American Civil Association’s public policy positions. Mr. Altschul Liberties Union, where he litigated Internet-related joined CTIA in 1990 after serving with the Antitrust free speech cases. He received his Juris Doctorate in Division of the U.S. Department of Justice. Prior to 2001 from the University of Southern California and that, he began his legal career as an attorney special- his Bachelor’s degree from the University of Texas. izing in antitrust litigation with Simpson Thacher Bartlett in New York. During his ten-year stint at the Laura D. Berger Justice Department, he worked exclusively on com- Laura Berger is a senior attorney in the Division munications matters, including the modification of of Privacy and Identity Protection at the FTC. final judgment and the GTE decree, as well as related She enforces federal laws that protect the privacy Federal Communications Commission filings and and security of consumers’ information and works telecommunications industry mergers and acquisi- on related policy matters, including the impact of tions.
    [Show full text]
  • Content Or Context Moderation? 1 Table of Contents
    CON OR TEXT MODERATION Artisanal, Community-Reliant, and Industrial Approaches ROBYN CAPLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Platform companies are increasingly being called upon to make ethical decisions regarding speech, and in response, the public is becoming more interested in how content moder- ation policies are formed by platform employees. At the same time, interest in this topic has overwhelmingly focused on major social media platforms, such as Facebook, which is a rare type of organization when considering content moderation. This report investigates the differences between platform companies of various sizes and examines the tensions and tradeoffs organizations must make as they set rules and guidelines for content online. Through an interview study with representatives from 10 major platforms, this report explores the resource gaps, in terms of diversity and amount of personnel and technology, which exist in platform companies of different missions, business models, and size of team. In particular, it focuses on three different models of content moderation: 1) Artisanal, for platforms such as Vimeo, Medium, Patreon, or Discord; 2) Community-Reliant, for platforms such as Wikimedia and Reddit; and 3) Industrial approaches, for platforms such as Facebook or Google. As these companies make content policy that has an impact on citizens around the world, they must carefully consider how to be sensitive to localized variations in how issues like context-based speech, like hate speech and disinformation, manifest in different regions and political circumstances. At the same time, due to the scale at which they are operating, these companies are often working to establish consistent rules, both to increase transpa- rency for users and to operationalize their enforcement for employees.
    [Show full text]
  • The Manhattan Beach
    2018-19 Manhattan Beach Education Foundation Annual Report & Honor Roll Enrich and Empower The Manhattan Beach Education Foundation is a community driven fundraising organization, which supplements state funding for programs that inspire learning, enrich teaching, and promote innovation and academic excellence in the public schools of Manhattan Beach. Dear Friends of MBEF – When we envision the type of learning environment we want for our children, we dream of empowering and enriching their academic lives with personalized learning, hands-on opportunities in science, art, and music, strong foundations in core subjects like language arts and math, as well as inspirational opportunities for collaboration and connection. Because of you, our generous Because of You community, the Manhattan Beach Education Foundation (MBEF) is able to support the quality education that we all envision. We invite you to learn more about MBEF’s impact and the specific programs that you helped prioritize and make possible for the coming 2019-20 school year. Thanks to your generosity, MBEF will provide over $6.5 million to our District – the largest MBEF grant ever – to deliver a vast array of programs to enrich the educational experience of our students. Our schools and students excel because of you – the parents, business leaders, educators and neighbors who are committed to our children’s education and future. We are inspired by your investment in our schools and look forward to partnering with you again for another school year. With great appreciation, Dan Rogoff Hilary Mahan President, MBEF Executive Director, MBEF Our Mission // 2 The MBEF Difference These numbers only begin to convey the sheer magnitude of every child’s classroom $6.5 experience because of your 5259 support of MBEF.
    [Show full text]
  • Privacy & Free Speech
    Privacy & Free Speech It’s Good for Business 2nd edition A Publication of the ACLU of California Online at aclunc.org/business/primer n recent years, online privacy and free speech have become hot topics among users, Ilegislators, regulators, and investors. Many companies have experienced firsthand how decisions about privacy and free speech can impact their business. Companies that have failed to take privacy and free speech into account have been hit with public relations nightmares, costly lawsuits, government investigations, and the loss of customers and business partners. Meanwhile, companies that have designed their products and business plans to protect users have not only avoided these harms but benefitted from positive PR and increased customer trust. Building privacy and free speech protections into your service and company takes planning. This publication is intended to get you started. It walks you through basic questions you need to address in order to properly integrate privacy and free speech into your products and illustrates how doing so can help your company thrive. What’s new in this edition This second edition of Privacy & Free Speech: It’s Good for Business includes updated recommendations for policies and practices, as well as dozens of new real-life case studies from A(mazon) to Z(ynga). Its purpose is to help your company spot potential privacy and free speech issues in products and business models. The tools in this publication will enable you to make the smart, proactive decisions necessary to avoid problems, protect customers, and boost your bottom line. The online version of this primer (aclunc.org/tech/primer) includes continuously-updated resources to help you identify and employ best practices for building privacy and free speech into your product.
    [Show full text]