DOCSLIB.ORG

Evolution and Maintenance of Batesian Mimicry, with Particular Reference to Hover

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evolution and Maintenance of Batesian Mimicry, with Particular Reference to Hover Evolution and maintenance of Batesian mimicry, with particular reference to hover flies (Diptera: Syrphidae) By Arash Rashed A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Biology Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario August 2006 © 2006, Arash Rashed Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Library and Bibliotheque et Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-18233-8 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-18233-8 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet,distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans loan, distribute and sell theses le monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non­ sur support microforme, papier, electronique commercial purposes, in microform, et/ou autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. this thesis. Neither the thesis Ni la these ni des extraits substantiels de nor substantial extracts from it celle-ci ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement may be printed or otherwise reproduits sans son autorisation. reproduced without the author's permission. In compliance with the Canadian Conformement a la loi canadienne Privacy Act some supporting sur la protection de la vie privee, forms may have been removed quelques formulaires secondaires from this thesis. ont ete enleves de cette these. While these forms may be included Bien que ces formulaires in the document page count, aient inclus dans la pagination, their removal does not represent il n'y aura aucun contenu manquant. any loss of content from the thesis. i * i Canada Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ABSTRACT In this project I tackled some of the unanswered questions regarding morphological and behavioural mimicry in hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae), using novel approaches. First, I tested the possible role of invertebrate predators, specifically dragonflies, in the evolution of mimicry in hover flies. While dragonflies showed a significant tendency to attack small-sized prey compared to large-sized prey types, they did not seem to avoid the wasp-like colours and patterns of mimetic hover flies and attacked both mimics and non-mimetic prey types, of the same size, at a similar rate. Second, a test of the ‘competitive mimicry’ hypothesis is performed. The basic tenet of this hypothesis is that mimetic hover flies benefit from their similarity to predatory yellow-jackets by an improved access to resources since other pollinators avoid visiting flowers that they occupy. Pollinators were more likely to visit unoccupied flowers compared to flowers occupied with either natural or artificial specimens. However, pollinators did not show reduced visits to flowers pinned with specimens bearing wasp­ like colours compared to flowers occupied by same-sized specimens that were non- mimetic. Third, we used neural network to objectively assess the degree of similarity between hover fly images and their wasp models. Furthermore, using available data on pigeon’s classification of hover fly images and also genetic algorithms along with neural network, we identified a reduced set of characteristics that birds may have used to rank the similarity hover fly images to wasps and flies. Finally, in a behavioural study, I quantitatively compared the sounds produced by species of hymenopteran models and mimetic hover flies, when they were artificially iii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. attacked. Although I found some similarity in the buzzing sounds produced by bumble bees and their hover fly mimic, E. flavipes, I did not observe this similarity between the other two hymenoptera models (wasps and honeybees) and their presumed mimics. Moreover, all of the tested mimetic hover flies buzzed similarly to one another, independent of the model they resemble. The “buzzing behaviour” was not observed in the tested yellow-jacket wasps. However, all of the tested hoverflies, bumblebees and honeybees emitted a distinctive and quantifiable “buzz” when probed. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This thesis project would have been a formidable challenge with out the help of as many as people I am about to name and thank. I appreciate all their support, encouragement, and friendship. Dr. Tom Sherratt, my supervisor, deserves special thanks for his attention to his graduate students and providing an enjoyable working environment above his many other commitments. I was lucky to have the chance to work with a knowledgeable scientist like Tom and to learn from him. He provided me with immeasurable support during my academic program. I thank Tom for his patience and understanding. I thank Dr. Mark Forbes, my advisor, for all his support and help over past few years. Mark, I acknowledge that I have been a troublesome student! You believed in my capabilities more than I did myself and took me as a graduate student when I first arrived despite the fact that English was my second language and also I was new to the Canadian lab environment. I first started to volunteer in Dr. John Amason’s lab at the University of Ottawa. I would like to thank John for accepting me in his lab and letting me to help with one of his ongoing projects. It was a great opportunity for me to experience working in a new environment with a great team and to learn about the other projects that his graduate students were working on. I also wish to thank Dr. Jeff Skevington from Canadian National Collection of Arthropods who patiently supervised, while I learned molecular techniques. Jeff also V Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. helped me with a lot of insect identifications for this research and I consider myself lucky to have had him here in Ottawa. I would like to thank Dr. Jayne Yack for letting me to use the sound recording equipment in her lab. Also many thank to Dr. Jeff Dawson for teaching me to use acoustic equipment. At Queen’s University Biological Station, Frank Phelan and Floyd Connor provided me with a valuable research environment, without which various aspects of the study could not have happened. Special thanks to Dr. Rod Bain who patiently answered my questions regarding Neural Networks, an area that I knew absolutely nothing about before the project, and tried to make the system even easier to use for us. I also have to acknowledge that I have learned a lot form my lab-mate Chris Beatty. I would like to thank Chris for all his help. Finally, I wish to specially thank my parents and also my wife Tirazheh Eslami, who have provided support through out my education, and also my friends and colleagues Yemisi Dare, Hume Douglas, Nahideh Haghighi, Shuyou Han, Imran Khan, Stacey Lee-Jankins, David Lowe, Justin Mahoney, Hannah Mir-Rashed, Tonia Robb, Bin Xang and all others who helped me at different stages and in various forms. vi Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Table of Contents Page Abstract............................................................................................................................. iii Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................... v Table of Contents ............................................................................................................ vii List of Tables .....................................................................................................................xi List of Figures ..................................................................................................................xiii List of Appendices .......................................................................................................... xix Chapter 1. General Introduction 1.1 Animal Defence ........................................................................................1 1.2 Hover Flies ................................................................................................4 1.2.1 Morphology .............................................................. 5 1.3 Imperfect Mimicry ................................................................................... 6 Chapter 2. Prey selection by dragonflies in relation to prey-size and wasp-like colours and patterns 2.1 Preface................................................................................................... 13 2.2 Introduction ...........................................................................................14
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Diptera: Syrphidae
    This is a repository copy of The relationship between morphological and behavioral mimicry in hover flies (Diptera: Syrphidae).. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/80035/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Penney, HD, Hassall, C orcid.org/0000-0002-3510-0728, Skevington, JH et al. (2 more authors) (2014) The relationship between morphological and behavioral mimicry in hover flies (Diptera: Syrphidae). The American Naturalist, 183 (2). pp. 281-289. ISSN 0003-0147 https://doi.org/10.1086/674612 Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ The relationship between morphological and behavioral mimicry in hover flies (Diptera: Syrphidae)1 Heather D. Penney, Christopher Hassall, Jeffrey H. Skevington, Brent Lamborn & Thomas N. Sherratt Abstract Palatable (Batesian) mimics of unprofitable models could use behavioral mimicry to compensate for the ease with which they can be visually discriminated, or to augment an already close morphological resemblance.
    [Show full text]
  • Is the Mega-Diverse Genus Ocyptamus (Diptera, Syrphidae) Monophyletic
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 62 (2012) 191–205 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Is the mega-diverse genus Ocyptamus (Diptera, Syrphidae) monophyletic? Evidence from molecular characters including the secondary structure of 28S rRNA ⇑ Ximo Mengual a,c, , Gunilla Ståhls b, Santos Rojo c a Dept. of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, PO Box 37012, MRC-0169, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA b Zoological Unit, Finnish Museum of Natural History, PO Box 17, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland c Instituto Universitario CIBIO – Dpto. de Ciencias Ambientales y Recursos Naturales, Universidad de Alicante, Apdo. 99, E-03080 Alicante, Spain article info abstract Article history: Phylogenetic relationships between two New World Syrphinae taxa (Diptera, Syrphidae), i.e. the highly Received 17 March 2011 diverse genus Ocyptamus and the large genus Toxomerus, were analysed based on molecular characters. Revised 17 August 2011 The monophyly of both taxa was tested and the taxonomic status of included subgenera and species Accepted 23 September 2011 groups was examined. Toxomerus constitutes the monogeneric tribe Toxomerini with more than 140 Available online 29 September 2011 described species, while Ocyptamus (tribe Syrphini) is a very diverse genus (over 300 spp.) with multiple recognised subgenera and species groups. Sequence data from three gene regions were used: the mito- Keywords: chondrial protein-coding gene cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) and the nuclear 28S and 18S ribo- Toxomerus somal RNA genes. The secondary structure of two expansion segments (D2, D3) of the ribosomal 28S Ocyptamus Monophyly RNA gene is presented for the family Syrphidae and used for the first time in a multiple sequence align- Syrphidae ment.
    [Show full text]
  • Dragonflies (Odonata) of the Northwest Territories Status Ranking And
    DRAGONFLIES (ODONATA) OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES STATUS RANKING AND PRELIMINARY ATLAS PAUL M. CATLING University of Ottawa 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ....................................................................3 Acknowledgements ...........................................................3 Methods ....................................................................3 The database .................................................................4 History .....................................................................5 Rejected taxa ................................................................5 Possible additions ............................................................5 Additional field inventory ......................................................7 Collection an Inventory of dragonflies .............................................8 Literature Cited .............................................................10 Appendix Table 1 - checklist ...................................................13 Appendix Table 2 - Atlas and ranking notes .......................................15 2 ABSTRACT: occurrences was provided by Dr. Rex Thirty-five species of Odonata are given Kenner, Dr. Donna Giberson, Dr. Nick status ranks in the Northwest Territories Donnelly and Dr. Robert Cannings (some based on number of occurrences and details provided below). General distributional area within the territory. Nine information on contacts and locations of species are ranked as S2, may be at risk, collections provided by Dr. Cannings
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter of the Biological Survey of Canada
    Newsletter of the Biological Survey of Canada Vol. 40(1) Summer 2021 The Newsletter of the BSC is published twice a year by the In this issue Biological Survey of Canada, an incorporated not-for-profit From the editor’s desk............2 group devoted to promoting biodiversity science in Canada. Membership..........................3 President’s report...................4 BSC Facebook & Twitter...........5 Reminder: 2021 AGM Contributing to the BSC The Annual General Meeting will be held on June 23, 2021 Newsletter............................5 Reminder: 2021 AGM..............6 Request for specimens: ........6 Feature Articles: Student Corner 1. City Nature Challenge Bioblitz Shawn Abraham: New Student 2021-The view from 53.5 °N, Liaison for the BSC..........................7 by Greg Pohl......................14 Mayflies (mainlyHexagenia sp., Ephemeroptera: Ephemeridae): an 2. Arthropod Survey at Fort Ellice, MB important food source for adult by Robert E. Wrigley & colleagues walleye in NW Ontario lakes, by A. ................................................18 Ricker-Held & D.Beresford................8 Project Updates New book on Staphylinids published Student Corner by J. Klimaszewski & colleagues......11 New Student Liaison: Assessment of Chironomidae (Dip- Shawn Abraham .............................7 tera) of Far Northern Ontario by A. Namayandeh & D. Beresford.......11 Mayflies (mainlyHexagenia sp., Ephemerop- New Project tera: Ephemeridae): an important food source Help GloWorm document the distribu- for adult walleye in NW Ontario lakes, tion & status of native earthworms in by A. Ricker-Held & D.Beresford................8 Canada, by H.Proctor & colleagues...12 Feature Articles 1. City Nature Challenge Bioblitz Tales from the Field: Take me to the River, by Todd Lawton ............................26 2021-The view from 53.5 °N, by Greg Pohl..............................14 2.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Odonata of the Patoka River National Wildlife Refuge and Management Area
    2012. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 121(1):54–61 A SURVEY OF ODONATA OF THE PATOKA RIVER NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE AND MANAGEMENT AREA Donald L. Batema* and Amanda Bellian: Department of Chemistry, Environmental Studies Program, University of Evansville, 1800 Lincoln Avenue, Evansville, IN 47722 USA Lindsey Landowski: Mingo National Wildlife Refuge, Puxico, MO. 63960 USA ABSTRACT. The Patoka River National Wildlife Refuge and Management Area (hereafter Patoka River Refuge or the Refuge) represents one of the largest intact bottomland hardwood forests in southern Indiana, with meandering oxbows, marshes, ponds, managed moist-soil units, and constructed wetlands that provide diverse and suitable habitat for wildlife. Refuge personnel strive to protect, restore, and manage this bottomland hardwood ecosystem and associated habitats for a variety of wildlife. The Patoka River National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan (CCP) lists many species of management priority (McCoy 2008), but Odonata are not included, even though they are known to occur on the Refuge. The absence of Odonata from the CCP is the result of lack of information about this ecologically important group of organisms. Therefore, we conducted a survey, from May to October 2009, to document their presence, with special attention being paid to rare, threatened, and endangered species. A total of 43 dragonfly and damselfly species were collected and identified. No threatened or endangered species were found on the Refuge, but three species were found that are considered imperiled in Indiana based on Nature Serve Ranks (Stein 2002). Additionally, 19 new odonate records were documented for Pike County, Indiana. The results of this survey will be used by Refuge personnel to assist in management decisions and to help establish priorities for the Patoka River Refuge activities and land acquisition goals.
    [Show full text]
  • Hoverfly Newsletter No
    Dipterists Forum Hoverfly Newsletter Number 48 Spring 2010 ISSN 1358-5029 I am grateful to everyone who submitted articles and photographs for this issue in a timely manner. The closing date more or less coincided with the publication of the second volume of the new Swedish hoverfly book. Nigel Jones, who had already submitted his review of volume 1, rapidly provided a further one for the second volume. In order to avoid delay I have kept the reviews separate rather than attempting to merge them. Articles and illustrations (including colour images) for the next newsletter are always welcome. Copy for Hoverfly Newsletter No. 49 (which is expected to be issued with the Autumn 2010 Dipterists Forum Bulletin) should be sent to me: David Iliff Green Willows, Station Road, Woodmancote, Cheltenham, Glos, GL52 9HN, (telephone 01242 674398), email:[email protected], to reach me by 20 May 2010. Please note the earlier than usual date which has been changed to fit in with the new bulletin closing dates. although we have not been able to attain the levels Hoverfly Recording Scheme reached in the 1980s. update December 2009 There have been a few notable changes as some of the old Stuart Ball guard such as Eileen Thorpe and Austin Brackenbury 255 Eastfield Road, Peterborough, PE1 4BH, [email protected] have reduced their activity and a number of newcomers Roger Morris have arrived. For example, there is now much more active 7 Vine Street, Stamford, Lincolnshire, PE9 1QE, recording in Shropshire (Nigel Jones), Northamptonshire [email protected] (John Showers), Worcestershire (Harry Green et al.) and This has been quite a remarkable year for a variety of Bedfordshire (John O’Sullivan).
    [Show full text]
  • White Admiral Newsletter
    W h i t e A d m i r a l Newsletter 88 Summer 2014 Suffolk Naturalists’ Society C o n te n t s E d i t or i a l Ben Heather 1 Another new fungus for Suffolk Neil Mahler 2 The battle continues…the fight Matt Holden 4 against invasive alien plants in the Stour Valley! Nesting Materials Richard Stewart 8 How you can help monitor Suffolk’s Su e H o ot on 8 b a t s ? Records please! Rosemary Leaf Beetle Ben Heather 10 Stratiomys longicornis – a fly a long Peter Vincent 11 way from home! Periglacial Landforms in Breckland Caroline Markham 13 Are some roadside plants on the Dr. Anne Kell and 15 verge of extinction? Dennis Kell Where has all the road kill gone? Tom Langton 21 Back on the Hopper Trail in 2013 Colin Lucas & 22 Tricia Taylor Volucella zonaria – an impressive Peter Vincent 24 b e a s t Suffolk Show Wildlife H a w k H on e y 27 Suffolk’s Nature Strategy Nick Collinson 29 Species ‘Re - introductions’ Nick Miller 32 ISSN 0959-8537 Published by the Suffolk Naturalists’ Society c/o Ipswich Museum, High Street, Ipswich, Suffolk IP1 3QH Registered Charity No. 206084 © Suffolk Naturalists’ Society Front cover: Alder spittle bug - Aphrophora alni by Ben Heather Newsletter 88 - Summer 2014 Thank you to all those who have contributed to this full issue of the White Admiral newsletter. This issue covers a wide range of topics from roadside verges to an observation on the lack of roadkill on our roads.
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptations Dragonflies and Dragon
    Odonatologica 7 (1): 27-47 March 1,1978 Thermal adaptationsof dragonflies M.L. May Departmentof Physiology and Biophysics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Campaign, 524 Burrill Hall, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States Received and Accepted September 26, 1977 Most Odonata probably exert some control over their body temperature. Such behaviour is favored by the high, variable temperatureof their terrestrial and habitat by the fact that dragonflies are relatively large insects and thus ex- change heat with the environment comparatively slowly. Different species may thermoregulate behaviorally by controlling the external heat load or physiol- ogically by altering the amount of heat generated by or dissipated from the thoracic muscles. The former method is characteristic of perchers, which are usually in a situation that permits considerable modulation of intercepted solar radiation, mostly by postural adjustments. There is also evidence that some species may perch more frequently in the shade when ambient tem- perature is high. Fliers, by contrast, have little opportunity to control inter- cepted solar radiation but continually generate large amounts of heat during flight. They may alter their rate of heat loss by controlling haemolymph flow from the thorax or their rate of heat gain by changing the proportion of gliding vs. flapping flight. Some species combine behavioral and physiological modes of regulation.Adaptive geographic, seasonal, and inter-habitat variation occurs in the responses of dragonflies to temperature.Voluntary avoidance of high temperature seems most closely adapted to the thermal environment. and Temperature responses thermoregulatory ability also vary with age and sex. The effects of temperature on the activity patterns of Odonata and the adaptive significance of thermoregulationhave yet to be rigorously demon- strated in most cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on American Species of Triacanthagyna and Gynacantha
    UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY Miscellaneous Publications No. 9 Notes on American Species of Triacanthagyna and Gynacantha BY E. B. WILLIAMSON ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN PUBLISHED BY THE UNIVERSITY JULY 2, 1923 LTNIVJ2RSITY OF MICHIGAN MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY Miscellaneous Publications No. 9 Notes on American Species of Triacanthagyna and Gynacantha BY E. B. WILLIAMSON ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN PUBLISHED BY THE UNIVERSITY JULY 2, 1923 'I'he publicat~orisof the XIuseum of Zoology, ljlliversity of lIichigan, ion-iit of tno series-the Occasional L'apers ant1 the lf~scellal~eousPuh11- cations. Both series were fou~ldedby Dr. Bryant Walker, Mr. Uradsha~v H Swales and Dr. W. W. Nen~colnb. The Occasional Papers, publicatio~lof I\-hicli \\-as begun iu 10~3,serve as a medium for the publicatio~lof brief original papers based principally upon the collectiolls in the h9useum. The papers are issued separately to libraries and specialists, and, when a sufficient number of pages have been printed to make a -\rolume, a title page, table of contents and index are sup- plied to libraries and illdivid~~alson the mailing list for the entire series. The Miscellaneous Publicatiotls include papers on field and museum technique, monographic studies and other papers not within the scope of the Occasiotlal Papers. The papers are p~thlishcdseparately, and, as it is not intended that they shall be grouped illto volumes, each llulllber has a title page and table of contents. ALEXANDERG. RUTHVI:N, Director of the hIuseurn of Zoology, University of Michigan. NOTES ON AMERICAN SPECIES OF TRIACANTIlAGYNA AND GYNACANTHA (ODONATX) During the past seventeen years illally dragonflies from tropical America have been added to my collection.
    [Show full text]
  • ESM-Table 1A/B. Species of the Suborders Anisoptera (A) and Zygoptera (B) Included in This Study; Ind
    ESM-Table 1a/b. Species of the suborders Anisoptera (a) and Zygoptera (b) included in this study; Ind. = number of individuals analysed; ID = abbreviation of species name; Loc. = number of sample sites (localities). (a) Suborder: Anisoptera (b) Suborder: Zygoptera Family: Aeshnidae Family: Calopterygidae Species Ind. Loc. ID Species Ind. Loc. ID Aeshna cyanea 1 1 Aecy Phaon iridipennis 39 19 Pi Aeshna ellioti ellioti 1 1 Aelel Calopteryx haemorrhoidales 21 5 ch Aeshna ellioti usambarica 1 1 Aelus Calopteryx splendens 20 6 cs Aeshna grandis 1 1 Aegr Calopteryx virgo 51cv Aeshna rileyi 1 1 Aerl Coryphaeschna adnexa 1 1 Corad Family: Clorocyphidae Coryphaeschna perrensi 1 1 Corpe Anaciaeschna isosceles 1 1 Anaiso Chlorocypha aphrodite 1 1 Cap Anaciaeschna triangulifera 1 1 Anatri Platycypha amboniensis 21PA Anax imperator 88 16 Ai Platycypha auripes 2 1 Pau Anax junius 11Aj Platycypha caligata 56 11 Pc Anax parthenope 11Ap Anax speratus 21 4 As Family: Megapodagrionidae Anax ephippiger 19 4 Ae Brachytron pratense 1 1 Brpr Amanipodagrion gilliesi 11Ag Gynacantha manderica 1 1 Gyma Heteagrion sp. 2 1 Hsp Gynacantha usambarica 10 4 Gu Gynacantha villosa 1 1 Gyvill Family: Pseudolestidae Family: Gomphidae Rhipidolestes hiraoi 1 1 Rhd Paragomphus geneii 32 9 Pg Family: Coenagrionidae Family: Libellulidae Pseudagrion acaciae 42Pa Pseudagrion bicoerulans 22 4 Pb Nesciothemis farinosum 92Nf Pseudagrion commoniae 2 1 Pco Orthetrum brachiale 92Ob Pseudagrion gamblesi 2 1 Pga Orthetrum chrysostigma 34 9 Oc Pseudagrion hageni 21Ph Orthetrum coerulescens
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Conservation Plan Benton Lake National Wildlife
    Glossary accessible—Pertaining to physical access to areas breeding habitat—Environment used by migratory and activities for people of different abilities, es- birds or other animals during the breeding sea- pecially those with physical impairments. son. A.D.—Anno Domini, “in the year of the Lord.” canopy—Layer of foliage, generally the uppermost adaptive resource management (ARM)—The rigorous layer, in a vegetative stand; mid-level or under- application of management, research, and moni- story vegetation in multilayered stands. Canopy toring to gain information and experience neces- closure (also canopy cover) is an estimate of the sary to assess and change management activities. amount of overhead vegetative cover. It is a process that uses feedback from research, CCP—See comprehensive conservation plan. monitoring, and evaluation of management ac- CFR—See Code of Federal Regulations. tions to support or change objectives and strate- CO2—Carbon dioxide. gies at all planning levels. It is also a process in Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)—Codification of which the Service carries out policy decisions the general and permanent rules published in the within a framework of scientifically driven ex- Federal Register by the Executive departments periments to test predictions and assumptions and agencies of the Federal Government. Each inherent in management plans. Analysis of re- volume of the CFR is updated once each calendar sults helps managers decide whether current year. management should continue as is or whether it compact—Montana House bill 717–Bill to Ratify should be modified to achieve desired conditions. Water Rights Compact. alternative—Reasonable way to solve an identi- compatibility determination—See compatible use.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Dragonflies As Common, Flexible, and Charismatic Subjects for Teaching the Scientific Process
    Eastern Illinois University The Keep Faculty Research & Creative Activity Biological Sciences 1-1-2007 Using dragonflies sa common, flexible, and charismatic subjects for teaching the scientific process Paul Switzer Eastern Illinois University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://thekeep.eiu.edu/bio_fac Part of the Behavior and Ethology Commons, Entomology Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Switzer, P.V. (2007). Using dragonflies as common, flexible, and charismatic subjects for teaching the scientific process. The American Biology Teacher 69(3): 158-162. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Biological Sciences at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Research & Creative Activity by an authorized administrator of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. as Common, Flexible & Charismatic Subjects Using forDragonflies Teaching the Scientific Process P AUL V. S WI T ZER See this article with its beautiful images in full color online at: http://www.nabt.org/sites/S1/File/pdf/069-03-0158.pdf. iology laboratories are usually designed around eat other invertebrates in the jar . Adults are a bit more wary, convenientB and available subjects . For example, for animal yet if students avoid sudden movements or approaches, laboratories Daphnia magna, Drosophila melanogaster, frogs, they can get within inches of many common species . rats, and mice are common animals that are relatively easy Capture requires no more exotic equipment than either to obtain, relatively cheap, and consequently lend them- aerial (for adults) or aquatic (for larvae) nets, and adults can selves well to laboratory experimentation .
    [Show full text]