DOCSLIB.ORG

WORKSHEET 1 Summary Score Sheet

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
WORKSHEET 1 Summary Score Sheet SITE HAZARD ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET 1 Summary Score Sheet SITE INFORMATION: Name: J & J Salvage Drums Address: 832 73rd Ave SE, Olympia, WA 98501 Section/Township/Range: S2/T17N/R2W Latitude/Longitude: 46.982, -122.893 (46.981824, -122.892770 is closer to actual location) Parcel Number: 12702430100 Ecology FSID: 6719 Date Scored: November 24, 2015 Site assessed/ranked for the February 2016 update. SITE DESCRIPTION/HISTORY: This parcel (ID#12702430100) is located at 832 73rd Ave SE in Olympia, Washington in Thurston County just south of Tumwater and about a half of a mile northeast of the Olympia Regional Airport. This rectangular parcel is stretched between Tumwater Boulevard SE and 73rd Ave SE and encompasses almost 9 acres (8.69). In the southern end of this parcel, 73rd Ave SE intersects this lot and isolates a small triangle of land on the southern side. This property slopes south towards a 20-acre Swamp Lake which directly borders the property. The slopes in the area range from 0 to 15%. This parcel is zoned for residential, sensitive resource (most likely referring to the wetland), and light industrial uses. The surrounding area is generally composed of residential parcels (a mix of larger and or subdivided parcels) and light industrial uses. Soils type is listed as Indianola loamy sand. According to DOE’s database, 12 wells have at one point existed on this site. These include six currently active resource protection wells and six decommissioned wells. The shallowest resource protection well is 12 feet deep. No other information is available regarding these wells or any related sampling. Notes indicate that before the 1980’s, the site operated as an auto wrecking yard. By 1984, Jim Chapman bought the existing business and by the late 1990’s, the site was known as J&J Metals. J&J Metals operated as a scrap metal business and only accepted vehicles if all their fluids had been drained. On site metals were segregated into categories and sold to the public or commercial recyclers. By 2009, the long-time owner, James Chapman, had passed away. The family had closed the business and started cleaning up the site. It was stated by Colin Chapman, the property owner’s son, that they had removed more than 700 tons of scrap metal, 15 tons of garbage, and approximately 15,000 automobile and truck tires (the latter funded by an Ecology program) during initial site cleanup. The plan for the property was to clean up the site, have an Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) completed, and then sell the property. No information about an ESA on this site was found. County records show that in March 2012, the property changed ownership from the Chapman family to the Taylor family, with unknown relation to the original family. PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS: Between 1994 and 1999, the Thurston County Environmental Health Department conducted numerous inspections of J&J Metals. During these inspections secondary containment was installed around numerous hazardous waste storage areas and a contractor was hired to remove some oil-contaminated soils. Over the years, these inspections identified the following materials stored on site: lead-acid batteries, motor oil, PCB ballasts, light fixtures, and mineral oil. There are no inspection reports, photos, or business descriptions for when the property operated as a wrecking yard. On April 21, 2009, Thurston County Environmental Health Department conducted an initial investigation (ERTS #612367) that originated from staff identifying approximately a dozen partially buried drums on the property while inspecting the site. These drums are located in the very southern section of this parcel, on the south side of 73rd Ave SE, in the edge of the wetland. Most of the drums were completely rusted through and suspected to be very old. The few drums that contained liquids appeared to contain only rainwater. No odors, stains, or petroleum-like sheens were 1 observed in the immediate area, and there was no evidence of stressed vegetation. Due to the nature of the scrap metal business, there is a high risk that these drums were not empty when buried, as their metal would have been seen as a commodity. Due to the potential for subsurface contamination, this Initial Investigation recommended that the site be listed on Ecology’s Confirmed and Suspected Contaminated Sites List, and the suspected contaminate was listed as most likely being a petroleum product. It was stated, however, to hold off on the Site Hazard Assessment until after the ESA be conducted, but prior to sale. This SHA is being conducted as no copies of an ESA were received. A site inspection was conducted in May 2015. No property access was obtained (no one was present on site), and only what was visible of the fenced property from the road could be observed. The property itself appeared to have had all solid waste removed and the partially buried drums were still visible south of the roadway. Building structures on the south side of the property remained. Photos taken on 4/21/2009 during the Intial Investigation conducted by the Thurston County Environmental Health Department. 2 CONCLUSION: Historically, this property has been used as a wrecking yard before the 1980’s and later as a scrap metal business through 2012. Though it appears that most of the metals and other debris have been removed from this property, no Environmental Site Assessment or other sampling report have been received. Contamination potential remains high from both the past wrecking yard use (Arsenic, Cadmium, Chromium, Mercury, Lead, and petroleum constituents), and from approximately a dozen rusted out 55-gallon barrels partially buried by the wetland (most likely a petroleum constituent). Other contamination potential exists from other historical site activities, such storage of mineral oil and PCB in transformers. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: Contamination presence and type is unknown and unconfirmed. ROUTE SCORES: Surface Water/Human Health: 20.9 3 Surface Water/Environmental: 15.6 2 Air/Human Health: 21.8 3 Air/Environmental: 23.2 4 Groundwater/Human Health: 62.1 5 Overall Rank: HH= 5, ENV=3 1 3 WORKSHEET 2 Route Documentation 1. SURFACE WATER ROUTE a. List those substances to be considered for scoring: Source: 2, 9 If petroleum contamination is assumed, MTCA requires testing for petroleum releases for: BTEX, EDB, MTBE, total lead, cPAHs, naphthalene, PCBs, and VOCs. Also wrecking yard contamination includes all MTCA Metals arsenic, cadmium, chromium, mercury, and lead. b. Explain basis for choice of substance(s) to be used in scoring. TPH-gasoline, represents a common contaminate that could be impacting surface water c. List those management units to be considered for scoring: Source: 2, 9 Containers, including drums, waste piles, and spills to soil. d. Explain basis for choice of unit to be used in scoring: Unknown drum contains, now empty, assumed to be buried while still full since steel would have been a commodity used in the recycling business and contamination associated with the past site use of a wrecking yard and metal scrapping business. 2. AIR ROUTE a. List those substances to be considered for scoring: Source: 2, 9 If petroleum contamination is assumed, MTCA requires testing for petroleum releases for: BTEX, EDB, MTBE, total lead, cPAHs, naphthalene, PCBs, and VOCs. Also wrecking yard contamination includes all MTCA Metals arsenic, cadmium, chromium, mercury, and lead. b. Explain basis for choice of substance(s) to be used in scoring: TPH-gasoline, represents a common contaminate that could be impacting surface water c. List those management units to be considered for scoring: Source: 2, 9 Containers, including drums, waste piles, and spills to soil. d. Explain basis for choice of unit to be used in scoring: Unknown drum contains, now empty, assumed to be buried while still full since steel would have been a commodity used in the recycling business and contamination associated with the past site use of a wrecking yard and metal scrapping business. 3. GROUNDWATER ROUTE a. List those substances to be considered for scoring: Source:2, 9 If petroleum contamination is assumed, MTCA requires testing for petroleum releases for: BTEX, EDB, MTBE, total lead, cPAHs, naphthalene, PCBs, and VOCs. Also wrecking yard contamination includes all MTCA Metals arsenic, cadmium, chromium, mercury, and lead. b. Explain basis for choice of substance(s) to be used in scoring: TPG-gasoline and mercury from the list above, result in the highest ranking score. c. List those management units to be considered for scoring: Source: 2, 9 Containers, including drums, waste piles, and spills to soil. d. Explain basis for choice of unit to be used in scoring: Unknown drum contains, now empty, assumed to be buried while still full since steel would have been a commodity used in the recycling business and contamination associated with the past site use of a wrecking yard and metal scrapping business. 4 WORKSHEET 4 Surface Water Route 1.0 SUBSTANCE CHARACTERISTICS 1.1 HUMAN TOXICITY Drinking Carcino- Acute Chronic Water genicity Substance Value Toxicity Value Toxicity Value Value Standard (mg/kg-bw) (mg/kg/day) WOE PF* (µg/L) A 1 TPH-Gasoline 5 8 3306 (rat) 3 -- -- 0.029 (0.02 5 9*1) 2 *Potency Factor, ND=No Data Source: 1, 2 Highest Value: 8 (Max = 10) Plus 2 Bonus Points: No Final Toxicity Value: 8 (Max = 12) 1.2 ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICITY: (X) FRESHWATER ( ) MARINE Acute Water Quality Non-Human Mammalian Criteria Acute Toxicity Substance (µg/L) Value (mg/kg) Value 1 TPH-Gasoline 5300 2 3306 (rat) 3 2 Source:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FUTURE SCRAP ENVIRONMENT ACT PROPOSAL Auto Wrecking
    SUBMITTED TO MANITOBA CONSERVATION ON BEHALF OF XPOTENTIAL PRODUCTS INC, OPERATING AS: FUTURE SCRAP ENVIRONMENT ACT PROPOSAL Auto Wrecking Yard and Car Shredder 999 Redonda Street Rural Municipality of Springfield FEBRUARY, 2014 Prepared by: D. Ediger Consulting Services : ii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF DEVELOPMENT ..................................................................................... 2 2.1 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP .............................................................................................................. 2 2.2 LAND USE DESIGNATION .............................................................................................................. 2 2.3 ADJOINING PROPERTIES .............................................................................................................. 2 2.4 PROXIMITY TO RESIDENCES ........................................................................................................ 2 2.5 SITE ACCESS ............................................................................................................................... 3 2.6 FACILITY DESIGN ........................................................................................................................ 3 2.6.1 AUTO WRECKING YARD ................................................................................................ 3 2.6.2 SHREDDER AND PROCESSING AREA...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • By Alan Mcmillan 2009 Photos Used Are from Various Sources in His Archives
    Vanguard Spotters Guide By Alan McMillan 2009 Photos used are from various sources in his archives. Chapter 1 1948 The Beginning The 1948 Vanguard is quite easy to identify from the outside by the absence of rain gutters and marker lights, small bumper overriders and long doors. As we move to the interior we notice the much talked about right hand gear change, an eight button dash and most probably cloth seats. Surprisingly, the options for seats were cloth or leather with vinyl coming later. The pull out front door pockets, which those familiar with these will quickly remind me can only be effectively pulled out when the door is open, is also an indication that you are looking at a very old Vanguard. Close inspection of the front seat will reveal a screw type adjusting mechanism. When we open the bonnet we see some more differences over the more “normal” Vanguard engine bay views. The battery is mounted behind the engine on the firewall rather than at the side, there are no horns visible as they are mounted under the front bumper, a non vacuum advance distributor, a metal topped fuel pump (U type), a 32BI carburettor, a combined regulator/fuse box and a large inlet/outlet hose radiator with appropriate thermostat housing. Several chassis frames have been used on Vanguards, the main difference in the one used in 1948 is found in the shape of the front shock absorber mountings. These can only take the straight arm shock absorbers. I understand that later changes to increase the travel of the front end were brought about by experiences gained on Australian roads.
    [Show full text]
  • Little Elm Zoning Ordinance
    LITTLE ELM ZONING ORDINANCE TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................................... i LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................................................... v ARTICLE I – General Provisions 106.01.01 Title and Purpose .......................................................................................................................... 1 106.01.02 Authority ....................................................................................................................................... 1 106.01.03 Jurisdiction and Application .......................................................................................................... 1 106.01.04 Compliance Required .................................................................................................................... 1 106.01.05 Document Rules of Construction .................................................................................................. 3 106.01.06 Zoning Districts Established .......................................................................................................... 3 106.01.07 Official Zoning Map ....................................................................................................................... 4 106.01.08 Zoning District Boundaries ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • There Who Think That Regular Oil Changes Are a Waste of Time And
    SRVIO Head First There are still a few misguided car owners out c. install a used engine from a wrecking yard. there who think that regular oil changes are a waste After considering the expense of all three op of time and money. After all, why spend money on tions, they chose: something you can't see? This hands-off mainte d. none of the above, and sold the car instead. nance philosophy served the owners of a certain That's the end of one story, but the beginning of 1984 Toyota Cressida for almost 100,000 miles. Oil another. We decided to buy the Toyota and turn it changes and other scheduled maintenance came at into a long term project. When two guys from Ohio very irregular intervals, if at all. find a rust-free 1984 Cressida from North Carolina, a But what goes around comes around. And it blown motor that's in pieces in the trunk seems like eventually did, in a big way. Several seized piston a minor inconvenience. rings, some scuffed cylinder walls, and other inter Over the next few months, we'll look at the re nal engine problems finally brought the Cressida into pair, overhaul, and installation of the twin-cam six the shop for some long overdue attention. After the in four separate articles. We're jumping in head first engine was disassembled to total up the damage, the this month with a complete rebuild of the top end. owners were given their choices. They could: Next month we'll handle the repair of the bottom end.
    [Show full text]
  • Quality Code
    EXHIBIT A Draft Pleasanton Municipal Code Amendment Case P16-1418 (Proposed new language is underlined. Language proposed for deletion is in strikeout) Chapter 9.22 RECYCLING Sections: 9.22.010 Purpose and findings. 9.22.020 Definitions. 9.22.030 Permits required. 9.22.040 Permit approval process. 9.22.050 Building permit required. 9.22.060 Criteria and design standards. 9.22.030 Permits required. No person shall permit the placement, construction, or operation of any recycling facility without first obtaining a permit pursuant to the provisions set forth in this section. Recycling facilities may be permitted as set forth in Table 9.22.030. In addition, recycling facilities may also be allowed in planned unit developments (PUDs) which allow uses that are conditionally permitted in the commercial or industrial zoning districts listed in Table 9.22.030, and provided that the applicable permits are obtained pursuant to the requirements set forth in Table 9.22.030. Table 9.22.030 Permits Required for Recycling Facilities by Zoning District The types of recycling facilities listed below shall require the following permits in the commercial and industrial zon- ing districts, where the symbol “C” for conditional use permit, or “ACTC” for administrative temporary conditional use permit appears in the column beneath the zoning districts: Zoning District Type of Facility CR(m) CR(p) CN CC CS CF LI IP IG (m) (p) Recycling collec- TCAC TCAC TCAC TC TCAC TCAC AC TCAC tion facility, small* 1 Zoning District Type of Facility CR(m) CR(p) CN CC CS CF LI IP IG (m) (p) Recycling collec- C C C tion facility, large Recycling pro- C cessing facility, small Recycling pro- C cessing facility, large * Note: Reverse vending machines are included in the category of small collection facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Phenolic Molding Compounds in Automotive Powertrain Applications
    PHENOLIC MOLDING COMPOUNDS IN AUTOMOTIVE POWERTRAIN APPLICATIONS 17th Annual Automotive Composites Conference & Exhibition September 8, 2017 – Novi, Michigan Cedric Ball Hexion, Inc. Abstract The powertrain remains one vehicle system that itself has not undergone significant lightweighting as automakers strive to meet more stringent emission and fuel economy standards. The average light vehicle internal combustion engine (ICE) makes up over one-third of the total vehicle weight. Almost ninety percent of the engine’s weight is traditional iron, steel or aluminum. The balance is a variety of rubber, glass and plastic materials.1 High engine temperatures limit use of the most commonly available composite materials including polyamides (nylon). However, newer grades of phenolic-based engineering thermoset (ETS) materials / molding compounds are higher in strength, temperature and corrosion resistance allowing for their use in an increasing number of under-the-hood and powertrain applications. Together with smart design, automakers are converting more powertrain components from metal to engineering thermosets for both weight and frequently cost savings when significant post machining of metal is required to meet tight tolerances. This paper describes selected past, present and future uses of phenolic-based engineering thermoset materials for lightweighting of powertrain components. Introduction Bakelite® was the world’s first commercially produced plastic. Invented in 1909 by Dr. Leo Baekeland, Bakelite became one of the most versatile plastics ever produced.2 Its early uses ranged from consumer goods (e.g. telephones, jewelry) to industrial applications (e.g. electrical insulators, airplane propellers). Automobiles have used Bakelite molding compounds for gears, pulleys, electrical housings and brake components since the days of Henry Ford.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report
    PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT PERFORMED AT 2005, 2015, and 2019 South Main Street and 111 West 21st Street Los Angeles, California 90007 APN: 5126-030-009 Andersen Environmental Project No. 1309-1542 PREPARED FOR MS. LILLIAN MEYERSON 428 Bellagio Terrace Los Angeles, California 90049 October 18, 2013 2005, 2015, and 2019 South Main Street and 111 West 21st Street Ms. Lillian Meyerson Andersen Environmental Project No. 1309-1542 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................ 1 CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................................................................. 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS ......................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 LIMITATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS ................................................................................................................... 5 1.3 RELIANCE ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Spokane County
    Spokane County Zoning Code Department of Building and Planning 2016 Printing Date of Adoption: May 25, 2004 Effective Date: June 1, 2004 Responsible Officials: Board of Spokane County Commissioners Table of Contents Preface 14.100 Introductory Provisions ..................................................................................... 14.300 Definitions ............................................................................................................ 14.400 General Procedures ............................................................................................ 14.402 Amendments 14.404 Conditional Use Permits 14.406 Variances 14.408 Enforcement 14.410 Building Permit Review 14.500 Administrative Procedures ................................................................................ 14.502 Administrative Procedures 14.504 Administrative Interpretations 14.506 Administrative Permits 14.508 Nonconforming Provisions 14.510 Administrative Exceptions 14.512 Alternative Methods of Compliance 14.600 Zone Classifications ........................................................................................... 14.604 List of Zone Classifications 14.606 Urban Residential Zones.................................................................................... 14.608 Mixed Use Area Zone ........................................................................................ 14.612 Commercial Zones ............................................................................................. 14.614 Industrial Zones .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Edward Prestek Scholarship Fund, St
    EDWARD J. PRESTEK: HIS JUNKYARD WAS BALLARD'S `GASOLINE ALLEY' Seattle Times, The (WA) (Published as THE SEATTLE TIMES) - February 26, 1996 Author/Byline: TYRONE BEASON, SEATTLE TIMES STAFF REPORTER Edition: FINAL Section: DEATHS, FUNERALS Page: B6 Edward J. "Nick" Prestek was a small-time junk man at heart, but his enduring Nix Auto Wrecking company in Ballard was much more than the place to buy dirt-cheap car parts. It was a social landmark, a place where auto mechanics, car enthusiasts and tow-truck drivers converged for a little fellowship Though the Nix crowd has dwindled somewhat, the old stucco building and auto lot at 1406 Leary Way Northwest continues to be a social hub, a rustic and rusty reminder of the man who gave the place its essence. Mr. Prestek died Friday, Feb. 23, of natural causes at his home in Broadview. He was 83. His daughter Linda Lee says that in its heyday, "The Joint," as it was affectionately called, was frequented both by back-yard mechanics and men like "One-eyed Rat," a convicted murderer, and his son, also an ex-convict. Kids used to play in the auto yard, since it wasn't fenced in back then. Often, they made off with scrap parts without paying for them. Adults who came for parts also made out nicely, Mr. Prestek's stepson, Gerald Murphy, said. "He'd sell parts cheaper than anybody else," said Murphy, who now runs the business. Mr. Prestek bought Nix Auto Wrecking in 1939. His brother and business partner, Ernest Prestek, 76, of Mesa, Ariz., admits it was "a loose-knit operation" at first.
    [Show full text]
  • May/June 2006
    IN THIS ISSUE Get Roundabout in colour: • At the Wheel ..................................... 2 www.oecc.ca/vcb/ra03.pdf • Autojumble ..................................... 10 July 4 Meeting • The British Choice ........................... 5 • Editor’s Ramble ............................... 9 7:00 MCL Motor Cars, • Fort Langley Run ............................. 6 Vancouver • OECC/VCB Calendar ..................... 10 August 1 Meeting • LeMay Collection ............................. 7 7:00 Stewart Historic Farm, • Living Wtih CMS .............................. 8 Surrey (come at 6:00 and • Name This Mystery Car ................. 10 bring a picnic; bring your • Overland to Langley ........................ 1 English car and tour • Rare Embers of Bygone Days ........ 1 Crescent Beach and White • Wings & Wheels 2006 ..................... 9 Rock afterward) • What Was I Thinking? ..................... 1 OLD ENGLISH CAR CLUB OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, VANCOUVER COAST BRANCH MAY-JUN 2006 - VOL 11, NUM 3 Overland to Langley Rare Embers of What Was I Les Foster Bygone Days Thinking? “By road this 7th day of April, in the year of…” Who could blame Carl Knorr Elaine Lafontaine Or the Restoration of a and me for feeling like we should scrawl A few summers back Patrick Jones Demon Imp a claim on some handy rock after finally and I went on a trip into the interior of John Chapman reaching Langley in a 1951 Ford BC in pursuit of car graveyards. An Thames E83W pickup truck! auto-wrecking yard in Clinton proved to My story begins back in 1973 at a Nowadays it is seldom necessary to be of the bygone days where cars were Saturday car auction in Southend-on- question whether your vehicle can make abandoned without being crushed. Sea in Essex, England, when I was 20 it to the Fraser Valley from What we found were fields of trees and years old.
    [Show full text]
  • WASHINGTON Definitions
    WASHINGTON Definitions Horseless Carriage. Any motor vehicle which is at least forty years old, capable of being operated upon the highway and operated primarily as a collector vehicle. A horseless carriage may be driven to and from auto shows, circuses, parades, displays, special excursions, and antique car club meetings, for testing purposes, and for the pleasure of others without compensation. It may not be used for regular transportation in the manner of a fully licensed vehicle or commercial purposes or to carry a load. Collector. The owner of one or more vehicles described in RCW 46.18.220(1) who collects, purchases, acquires, trades, or disposes of the vehicle or parts of it, for his or her personal use, in order to preserve, restore, and maintain the vehicle for hobby or historical purposes. Collector Vehicle. Any motor vehicle or travel trailer that is at least thirty years old. A collector vehicle may be driven to and from auto shows, circuses, parades, displays, special excursions, and antique car club meetings, for testing purposes, and for the pleasure of others without compensation. It may not be used for regular transportation in the manner of a fully licensed vehicle or commercial purposes or to carry a load. Kit Vehicle. A passenger car or light truck assembled from a manufactured kit, and is either (i) a kit consisting of a prefabricated body and chassis used to construct a complete vehicle, or (ii) a kit consisting of a prefabricated body to be mounted on an existing vehicle chassis and drivetrain, commonly referred to as a donor vehicle.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Commission Staff Report Agenda Item No. 2 December 12, 2019
    DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND PLANNING STEVEN E. WHITE, DIRECTOR Planning Commission Staff Report Agenda Item No. 2 December 12, 2019 SUBJECT: Initial Study Application No. 7449 and Amendment Application No. 3829 Allow the rezone of a 42.6-acre parcel of land with split zoning [40.1 acres from the AL-20 (Limited Agricultural, 20-acre minimum parcel size) Zone District and 2.5 acres from the M-3(c) (Heavy Industrial, Conditional) Zone District limited to a parking lot] to the M-3(c) Zone District to allow limited heavy industrial, general industrial, and light manufacturing uses as requested by the Applicant. LOCATION: The project site is located on the southeast corner of E. Central Avenue and S. Willow Avenue approximately 3,002 feet east of the nearest city limits of City of Fresno (4216 S. Willow Avenue, Fresno) (Sup. Dist. 4) (APN 331-090-96). OWNER: We Be Jammin, LP APPLICANT: John B. Brelsford STAFF CONTACT: Ejaz Ahmad, Planner (559) 600-4204 Marianne Mollring, Senior Planner (559) 600-4569 RECOMMENDATION: • Recommend that the Board of Supervisors adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for Initial Study (IS) Application No. 7449; and • Recommend that the Board of Supervisors determine that the proposed rezone is consistent with the General Plan and County-adopted Roosevelt Community Plan, and approve Amendment Application No. 3829 with the recommended Mitigation Measures, Conditions of Approval and Project Notes; and • Direct the Secretary to prepare a Resolution to forward Amendment Application No. 3829 to the Board of Supervisors with a recommendation of approval, subject to the Mitigation Measures and Conditions of Approval as listed in the Staff Report.
    [Show full text]