DOCSLIB.ORG

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT PERFORMED AT 2005, 2015, and 2019 South Main Street and 111 West 21st Street Los Angeles, California 90007 APN: 5126-030-009 Andersen Environmental Project No. 1309-1542 PREPARED FOR MS. LILLIAN MEYERSON 428 Bellagio Terrace Los Angeles, California 90049 October 18, 2013 2005, 2015, and 2019 South Main Street and 111 West 21st Street Ms. Lillian Meyerson Andersen Environmental Project No. 1309-1542 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................ 1 CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................................................................. 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS ......................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 LIMITATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS ................................................................................................................... 5 1.3 RELIANCE ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 CURRENT AND HISTORICAL ADDRESSES ..................................................................................................... 6 2.2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................................... 6 2.3 PHYSICAL SETTING ....................................................................................................................................... 6 3.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE / INTERVIEWS ............................................................................................... 7 3.1 SITE RECONNAISSANCE ................................................................................................................................ 7 3.2 SUBJECT PROPERTY OBSERVATIONS ........................................................................................................... 7 3.3 ADJACENT PROPERTIES ............................................................................................................................... 8 3.4 INTERVIEWS .................................................................................................................................................. 9 3.5 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION ................................................................................................................... 9 4.0 HISTORICAL LAND USE ........................................................................................................................... 11 4.1 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY REVIEW ............................................................................................................... 11 4.2 BUILDING DEPARTMENT RECORDS REVIEW ............................................................................................. 12 4.3 CITY DIRECTORY REVIEW ......................................................................................................................... 13 4.4 SANBORN MAP REVIEW .............................................................................................................................. 14 4.5 HISTORICAL SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................. 18 5.0 GOVERNMENT REGULATORY AGENCIES ......................................................................................... 20 5.1 HEALTH DEPARTMENT ............................................................................................................................... 20 5.2 FIRE DEPARTMENT ..................................................................................................................................... 20 5.3 WATER QUALITY AUTHORITY ................................................................................................................... 20 5.4 OIL & GAS AUTHORITY ............................................................................................................................. 20 5.5 AIR QUALITY AUTHORITY ......................................................................................................................... 20 5.6 SANITATION DISTRICT ................................................................................................................................ 20 5.7 TOXIC SUBSTANCES AUTHORITY ............................................................................................................... 21 6.0 ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESEARCH .................................................................................................. 22 6.1 REGULATORY DATABASE REPORT ............................................................................................................ 22 7.0 VAPOR ENCROACHMENT SCREENING ............................................................................................... 24 7.1 VES TIER I .................................................................................................................................................. 24 7.2 VES TIER II ................................................................................................................................................ 24 8.0 NON-SCOPE ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS ................................................................................................ 25 8.1 ASBESTOS CONTAINING BUILDING MATERIALS ....................................................................................... 25 8.2 LEAD-BASED PAINT .................................................................................................................................... 25 8.3 RADON ......................................................................................................................................................... 26 8.4 WETLANDS .................................................................................................................................................. 26 8.5 MOLD .......................................................................................................................................................... 26 8.6 METHANE GAS ............................................................................................................................................ 27 SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................................... 28 SIGNATURES .............................................................................................................................................................. 31 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................................. 32 APPENDIX I - ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1: Topographic Map Figure 4: Site Photographs Figure 2: Site Vicinity Map Figure 5: Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps Figure 3: Site Plan APPENDIX II - RADIUS MAP REPORT APPENDIX III - OTHER DOCUMENTATION 2005, 2015, and 2019 South Main Street and 111 West 21st Street Ms. Lillian Meyerson Andersen Environmental Project No. 1309-1542 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Andersen Environmental has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I) for a light industrial property located at 2005, 2015, and 2019 South Main Street and 111 West 21st Street, in Los Angeles County and the City of Los Angeles, California, Assessor’s Parcel Number: 5126-030-009. The research conducted for this study and the report prepared are in conformance with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) All Appropriate Inquiry (AAI) standard and the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) E 1527-05 scope of work. Site Description According to our research and information provided by the client, Ms. Lillian Meyerson, the following addresses have been found to be associated with the subject property: 2005, 2011, 2013, 2015, and 2019 South Main Street and 101, 111, and 117 West 21st Street, Los Angeles, California. The subject property is located on the northwestern corner of South Main Street and West 21st Street, in the City of Los Angeles. The subject property is approximately 0.40 acres (18,000 square feet) in size and is occupied by a single- story office/warehouse structure, which is approximately 12,000 square feet in size. The building is currently occupied by George M. Fabric Co., a furniture fabric distribution company. The remaining portions of the property consist of a concrete-paved parking area on the western portion, which is enclosed by a chain link fence. The surrounding area is mostly used for commercial and industrial purposes. Groundwater is estimated to be in excess of 200 feet below ground surface in the area of the site. No significant hazardous material storage or recognized environmental conditions were observed at the site. Those interviewed, as persons familiar with the site were not aware of any negative environmental conditions associated with the property.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FUTURE SCRAP ENVIRONMENT ACT PROPOSAL Auto Wrecking
    SUBMITTED TO MANITOBA CONSERVATION ON BEHALF OF XPOTENTIAL PRODUCTS INC, OPERATING AS: FUTURE SCRAP ENVIRONMENT ACT PROPOSAL Auto Wrecking Yard and Car Shredder 999 Redonda Street Rural Municipality of Springfield FEBRUARY, 2014 Prepared by: D. Ediger Consulting Services : ii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF DEVELOPMENT ..................................................................................... 2 2.1 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP .............................................................................................................. 2 2.2 LAND USE DESIGNATION .............................................................................................................. 2 2.3 ADJOINING PROPERTIES .............................................................................................................. 2 2.4 PROXIMITY TO RESIDENCES ........................................................................................................ 2 2.5 SITE ACCESS ............................................................................................................................... 3 2.6 FACILITY DESIGN ........................................................................................................................ 3 2.6.1 AUTO WRECKING YARD ................................................................................................ 3 2.6.2 SHREDDER AND PROCESSING AREA...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • By Alan Mcmillan 2009 Photos Used Are from Various Sources in His Archives
    Vanguard Spotters Guide By Alan McMillan 2009 Photos used are from various sources in his archives. Chapter 1 1948 The Beginning The 1948 Vanguard is quite easy to identify from the outside by the absence of rain gutters and marker lights, small bumper overriders and long doors. As we move to the interior we notice the much talked about right hand gear change, an eight button dash and most probably cloth seats. Surprisingly, the options for seats were cloth or leather with vinyl coming later. The pull out front door pockets, which those familiar with these will quickly remind me can only be effectively pulled out when the door is open, is also an indication that you are looking at a very old Vanguard. Close inspection of the front seat will reveal a screw type adjusting mechanism. When we open the bonnet we see some more differences over the more “normal” Vanguard engine bay views. The battery is mounted behind the engine on the firewall rather than at the side, there are no horns visible as they are mounted under the front bumper, a non vacuum advance distributor, a metal topped fuel pump (U type), a 32BI carburettor, a combined regulator/fuse box and a large inlet/outlet hose radiator with appropriate thermostat housing. Several chassis frames have been used on Vanguards, the main difference in the one used in 1948 is found in the shape of the front shock absorber mountings. These can only take the straight arm shock absorbers. I understand that later changes to increase the travel of the front end were brought about by experiences gained on Australian roads.
    [Show full text]
  • Little Elm Zoning Ordinance
    LITTLE ELM ZONING ORDINANCE TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................................... i LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................................................... v ARTICLE I – General Provisions 106.01.01 Title and Purpose .......................................................................................................................... 1 106.01.02 Authority ....................................................................................................................................... 1 106.01.03 Jurisdiction and Application .......................................................................................................... 1 106.01.04 Compliance Required .................................................................................................................... 1 106.01.05 Document Rules of Construction .................................................................................................. 3 106.01.06 Zoning Districts Established .......................................................................................................... 3 106.01.07 Official Zoning Map ....................................................................................................................... 4 106.01.08 Zoning District Boundaries ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • There Who Think That Regular Oil Changes Are a Waste of Time And
    SRVIO Head First There are still a few misguided car owners out c. install a used engine from a wrecking yard. there who think that regular oil changes are a waste After considering the expense of all three op of time and money. After all, why spend money on tions, they chose: something you can't see? This hands-off mainte d. none of the above, and sold the car instead. nance philosophy served the owners of a certain That's the end of one story, but the beginning of 1984 Toyota Cressida for almost 100,000 miles. Oil another. We decided to buy the Toyota and turn it changes and other scheduled maintenance came at into a long term project. When two guys from Ohio very irregular intervals, if at all. find a rust-free 1984 Cressida from North Carolina, a But what goes around comes around. And it blown motor that's in pieces in the trunk seems like eventually did, in a big way. Several seized piston a minor inconvenience. rings, some scuffed cylinder walls, and other inter Over the next few months, we'll look at the re nal engine problems finally brought the Cressida into pair, overhaul, and installation of the twin-cam six the shop for some long overdue attention. After the in four separate articles. We're jumping in head first engine was disassembled to total up the damage, the this month with a complete rebuild of the top end. owners were given their choices. They could: Next month we'll handle the repair of the bottom end.
    [Show full text]
  • Quality Code
    EXHIBIT A Draft Pleasanton Municipal Code Amendment Case P16-1418 (Proposed new language is underlined. Language proposed for deletion is in strikeout) Chapter 9.22 RECYCLING Sections: 9.22.010 Purpose and findings. 9.22.020 Definitions. 9.22.030 Permits required. 9.22.040 Permit approval process. 9.22.050 Building permit required. 9.22.060 Criteria and design standards. 9.22.030 Permits required. No person shall permit the placement, construction, or operation of any recycling facility without first obtaining a permit pursuant to the provisions set forth in this section. Recycling facilities may be permitted as set forth in Table 9.22.030. In addition, recycling facilities may also be allowed in planned unit developments (PUDs) which allow uses that are conditionally permitted in the commercial or industrial zoning districts listed in Table 9.22.030, and provided that the applicable permits are obtained pursuant to the requirements set forth in Table 9.22.030. Table 9.22.030 Permits Required for Recycling Facilities by Zoning District The types of recycling facilities listed below shall require the following permits in the commercial and industrial zon- ing districts, where the symbol “C” for conditional use permit, or “ACTC” for administrative temporary conditional use permit appears in the column beneath the zoning districts: Zoning District Type of Facility CR(m) CR(p) CN CC CS CF LI IP IG (m) (p) Recycling collec- TCAC TCAC TCAC TC TCAC TCAC AC TCAC tion facility, small* 1 Zoning District Type of Facility CR(m) CR(p) CN CC CS CF LI IP IG (m) (p) Recycling collec- C C C tion facility, large Recycling pro- C cessing facility, small Recycling pro- C cessing facility, large * Note: Reverse vending machines are included in the category of small collection facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Phenolic Molding Compounds in Automotive Powertrain Applications
    PHENOLIC MOLDING COMPOUNDS IN AUTOMOTIVE POWERTRAIN APPLICATIONS 17th Annual Automotive Composites Conference & Exhibition September 8, 2017 – Novi, Michigan Cedric Ball Hexion, Inc. Abstract The powertrain remains one vehicle system that itself has not undergone significant lightweighting as automakers strive to meet more stringent emission and fuel economy standards. The average light vehicle internal combustion engine (ICE) makes up over one-third of the total vehicle weight. Almost ninety percent of the engine’s weight is traditional iron, steel or aluminum. The balance is a variety of rubber, glass and plastic materials.1 High engine temperatures limit use of the most commonly available composite materials including polyamides (nylon). However, newer grades of phenolic-based engineering thermoset (ETS) materials / molding compounds are higher in strength, temperature and corrosion resistance allowing for their use in an increasing number of under-the-hood and powertrain applications. Together with smart design, automakers are converting more powertrain components from metal to engineering thermosets for both weight and frequently cost savings when significant post machining of metal is required to meet tight tolerances. This paper describes selected past, present and future uses of phenolic-based engineering thermoset materials for lightweighting of powertrain components. Introduction Bakelite® was the world’s first commercially produced plastic. Invented in 1909 by Dr. Leo Baekeland, Bakelite became one of the most versatile plastics ever produced.2 Its early uses ranged from consumer goods (e.g. telephones, jewelry) to industrial applications (e.g. electrical insulators, airplane propellers). Automobiles have used Bakelite molding compounds for gears, pulleys, electrical housings and brake components since the days of Henry Ford.
    [Show full text]
  • Spokane County
    Spokane County Zoning Code Department of Building and Planning 2016 Printing Date of Adoption: May 25, 2004 Effective Date: June 1, 2004 Responsible Officials: Board of Spokane County Commissioners Table of Contents Preface 14.100 Introductory Provisions ..................................................................................... 14.300 Definitions ............................................................................................................ 14.400 General Procedures ............................................................................................ 14.402 Amendments 14.404 Conditional Use Permits 14.406 Variances 14.408 Enforcement 14.410 Building Permit Review 14.500 Administrative Procedures ................................................................................ 14.502 Administrative Procedures 14.504 Administrative Interpretations 14.506 Administrative Permits 14.508 Nonconforming Provisions 14.510 Administrative Exceptions 14.512 Alternative Methods of Compliance 14.600 Zone Classifications ........................................................................................... 14.604 List of Zone Classifications 14.606 Urban Residential Zones.................................................................................... 14.608 Mixed Use Area Zone ........................................................................................ 14.612 Commercial Zones ............................................................................................. 14.614 Industrial Zones .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Edward Prestek Scholarship Fund, St
    EDWARD J. PRESTEK: HIS JUNKYARD WAS BALLARD'S `GASOLINE ALLEY' Seattle Times, The (WA) (Published as THE SEATTLE TIMES) - February 26, 1996 Author/Byline: TYRONE BEASON, SEATTLE TIMES STAFF REPORTER Edition: FINAL Section: DEATHS, FUNERALS Page: B6 Edward J. "Nick" Prestek was a small-time junk man at heart, but his enduring Nix Auto Wrecking company in Ballard was much more than the place to buy dirt-cheap car parts. It was a social landmark, a place where auto mechanics, car enthusiasts and tow-truck drivers converged for a little fellowship Though the Nix crowd has dwindled somewhat, the old stucco building and auto lot at 1406 Leary Way Northwest continues to be a social hub, a rustic and rusty reminder of the man who gave the place its essence. Mr. Prestek died Friday, Feb. 23, of natural causes at his home in Broadview. He was 83. His daughter Linda Lee says that in its heyday, "The Joint," as it was affectionately called, was frequented both by back-yard mechanics and men like "One-eyed Rat," a convicted murderer, and his son, also an ex-convict. Kids used to play in the auto yard, since it wasn't fenced in back then. Often, they made off with scrap parts without paying for them. Adults who came for parts also made out nicely, Mr. Prestek's stepson, Gerald Murphy, said. "He'd sell parts cheaper than anybody else," said Murphy, who now runs the business. Mr. Prestek bought Nix Auto Wrecking in 1939. His brother and business partner, Ernest Prestek, 76, of Mesa, Ariz., admits it was "a loose-knit operation" at first.
    [Show full text]
  • May/June 2006
    IN THIS ISSUE Get Roundabout in colour: • At the Wheel ..................................... 2 www.oecc.ca/vcb/ra03.pdf • Autojumble ..................................... 10 July 4 Meeting • The British Choice ........................... 5 • Editor’s Ramble ............................... 9 7:00 MCL Motor Cars, • Fort Langley Run ............................. 6 Vancouver • OECC/VCB Calendar ..................... 10 August 1 Meeting • LeMay Collection ............................. 7 7:00 Stewart Historic Farm, • Living Wtih CMS .............................. 8 Surrey (come at 6:00 and • Name This Mystery Car ................. 10 bring a picnic; bring your • Overland to Langley ........................ 1 English car and tour • Rare Embers of Bygone Days ........ 1 Crescent Beach and White • Wings & Wheels 2006 ..................... 9 Rock afterward) • What Was I Thinking? ..................... 1 OLD ENGLISH CAR CLUB OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, VANCOUVER COAST BRANCH MAY-JUN 2006 - VOL 11, NUM 3 Overland to Langley Rare Embers of What Was I Les Foster Bygone Days Thinking? “By road this 7th day of April, in the year of…” Who could blame Carl Knorr Elaine Lafontaine Or the Restoration of a and me for feeling like we should scrawl A few summers back Patrick Jones Demon Imp a claim on some handy rock after finally and I went on a trip into the interior of John Chapman reaching Langley in a 1951 Ford BC in pursuit of car graveyards. An Thames E83W pickup truck! auto-wrecking yard in Clinton proved to My story begins back in 1973 at a Nowadays it is seldom necessary to be of the bygone days where cars were Saturday car auction in Southend-on- question whether your vehicle can make abandoned without being crushed. Sea in Essex, England, when I was 20 it to the Fraser Valley from What we found were fields of trees and years old.
    [Show full text]
  • WASHINGTON Definitions
    WASHINGTON Definitions Horseless Carriage. Any motor vehicle which is at least forty years old, capable of being operated upon the highway and operated primarily as a collector vehicle. A horseless carriage may be driven to and from auto shows, circuses, parades, displays, special excursions, and antique car club meetings, for testing purposes, and for the pleasure of others without compensation. It may not be used for regular transportation in the manner of a fully licensed vehicle or commercial purposes or to carry a load. Collector. The owner of one or more vehicles described in RCW 46.18.220(1) who collects, purchases, acquires, trades, or disposes of the vehicle or parts of it, for his or her personal use, in order to preserve, restore, and maintain the vehicle for hobby or historical purposes. Collector Vehicle. Any motor vehicle or travel trailer that is at least thirty years old. A collector vehicle may be driven to and from auto shows, circuses, parades, displays, special excursions, and antique car club meetings, for testing purposes, and for the pleasure of others without compensation. It may not be used for regular transportation in the manner of a fully licensed vehicle or commercial purposes or to carry a load. Kit Vehicle. A passenger car or light truck assembled from a manufactured kit, and is either (i) a kit consisting of a prefabricated body and chassis used to construct a complete vehicle, or (ii) a kit consisting of a prefabricated body to be mounted on an existing vehicle chassis and drivetrain, commonly referred to as a donor vehicle.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Commission Staff Report Agenda Item No. 2 December 12, 2019
    DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND PLANNING STEVEN E. WHITE, DIRECTOR Planning Commission Staff Report Agenda Item No. 2 December 12, 2019 SUBJECT: Initial Study Application No. 7449 and Amendment Application No. 3829 Allow the rezone of a 42.6-acre parcel of land with split zoning [40.1 acres from the AL-20 (Limited Agricultural, 20-acre minimum parcel size) Zone District and 2.5 acres from the M-3(c) (Heavy Industrial, Conditional) Zone District limited to a parking lot] to the M-3(c) Zone District to allow limited heavy industrial, general industrial, and light manufacturing uses as requested by the Applicant. LOCATION: The project site is located on the southeast corner of E. Central Avenue and S. Willow Avenue approximately 3,002 feet east of the nearest city limits of City of Fresno (4216 S. Willow Avenue, Fresno) (Sup. Dist. 4) (APN 331-090-96). OWNER: We Be Jammin, LP APPLICANT: John B. Brelsford STAFF CONTACT: Ejaz Ahmad, Planner (559) 600-4204 Marianne Mollring, Senior Planner (559) 600-4569 RECOMMENDATION: • Recommend that the Board of Supervisors adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for Initial Study (IS) Application No. 7449; and • Recommend that the Board of Supervisors determine that the proposed rezone is consistent with the General Plan and County-adopted Roosevelt Community Plan, and approve Amendment Application No. 3829 with the recommended Mitigation Measures, Conditions of Approval and Project Notes; and • Direct the Secretary to prepare a Resolution to forward Amendment Application No. 3829 to the Board of Supervisors with a recommendation of approval, subject to the Mitigation Measures and Conditions of Approval as listed in the Staff Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Scrap Yards and Metal Theft Insurance Claims in 51 U.S. Cities
    Scrap Yards and Metal Theft Insurance Claims in 51 U.S. Cities Kevin W. Whiteacre, Ph.D. Director Raeann Howes Research Assistant University of Indianapolis Community Research Center Research Brief #2 Presented at the American Society of Criminology annual meeting in Philadelphia, PA November 5, 2009 Community Research Center University of Indianapolis 1400 East Hanna Avenue Indianapolis, IN 46227 [email protected] 317-788-4929 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Thanks to Joe Kudla and Aaron Soline at the National Insurance Crime Bureau for sharing their data and for their helpful suggestions. Thanks also to Detectives Thomas Hildebrand and Andrew Starks of the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department for their invaluable assistance on this project. Funding for this study was provided by an InQuery Collaborative Grant sponsored by the University of Indianapolis Office of Grants and Sponsored Programs. The University of Indianapolis Community Research Center (CRC) serves as an educational facility in research and evaluation design for university students; supports the need of community organizations for data collection, storage, and analysis; and provides a setting to support university faculty and student research. Community Research Center | 1 INTRODUCTION Metal theft describes the theft of items for the value of their constituent metals (Whiteacre, Medler, Rhoton, & Howes, 2008). Jurisdictions across the country are reporting increased concerns over metal thefts. The Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries, Inc. (ISRI) has called the growth in metal theft an “overwhelming problem” for communities, police, and scrap metal recyclers. i Thefts of copper wires have resulted in power outages and decreased grid functioning. ii In 2007, a single insurance company in the U.K.
    [Show full text]