DOCSLIB.ORG

Fatal Footprint: the Global Human Impact of Cluster Munitions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fatal Footprint: the Global Human Impact of Cluster Munitions Fatal Footprint: The Global Human Impact of Cluster Munitions Preliminary Report, November 2006 Handicap International Table of Contents Table of Contents 2 Conclusion 65 LESSON 1: Acknowledgments 4 Data Collection, the Devil is in the Detail 65 Abbreviations and Acronyms 5 LESSON 2: Cluster Munitions Cause Disproportionate Introduction 6 Long-Term Civilian Harm 66 LESSON 3: Methodology and Research Team 8 Cluster Submunitions Casualties are Young Focus: Southeast Asia 11 Males at Work 67 LESSON 4: CAMBODIA 11 LAO PEOPLE’S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC 14 Immediate and Comprehensive Clearance VIETNAM 18 Reduces Civilian Casualties 68 Focus: Africa 22 Tables CHAD 22 TABLE 1: Confirmed Cluster Submunitions ERITREA 23 Casualties in Affected Countries 69 ETHIOPIA 25 TABLE 2: Status of Casualty Data Collection SIERRA LEONE 26 in Cluster Submunitions Affected Countries 70 SUDAN 27 Focus: Southeast Europe 30 Selected Biography 71 ALBANIA 30 BOSNIA and HERZEGOVINA 32 CROATIA 33 KOSOVO 35 MONTENEGRO 39 SERBIA 40 Focus: Commonwealth of Independent States 42 CHECHNYA/RUSSIAN FEDERATION 42 TAJIKISTAN 43 Focus: Greater Middle East and North Africa Region 45 AFGHANISTAN 45 IRAQ 49 KUWAIT 54 LEBANON 56 SAUDI ARABIA 61 SYRIA 61 WESTERN SAHARA/MOROCCO 62 Fatal Footprint: The Global Human Impact of Cluster Munition / 3 Acknowledgments his preliminary report was conducted, Action Center (CROMAC), Clear Path written and produced by Handicap International (CPI), HIB-Cambodia, Julien T International, with the financial support Temple, Reuben Nogueria-McCarthy and Edith of the Government of Norway. Karam from UNICEF, the Iraqi Health and Social Care Organization (IHSCO), John C. Brown from Handicap International (HI) would like to VVAF Iraq, Landmine Action UK (LMA UK), the express its appreciation to the many mine Landmine Resource Center staff (LMRC), the action organizations, organizations working National Demining Office (NDO) and the UN with people with disabilities, disabled people’s Mine Action Coordination Center for South organizations and the other individuals and Lebanon (MACC-SL) in Lebanon, Mines Advisory organizations that provided information, time, Group Iraq (MAG), the National Authority for resources and expertise for this study. Prosthetics and Orthotics (NAPO) and the UN HI owes special thanks to the cluster sub- Mine Action Office in Sudan (UNMAO), the munitions and other mine/ERW survivors, fami- National Demining Office in Chad (HCND), the lies and communities who shared their experi- Office of the Kosovo Protection Corps ence. Coordinator (OKPCC) EOD Management Unit, Rosy Cave at the United Nations Institute for The team values the support of the Disarmament Research (UNIDIR), Steve Goose, International Campaign to Ban Mark Hiznay and Bonnie Docherty at Human Landmines/Landmine Monitor and the Cluster Rights Watch (HRW), UN Mission in Ethiopia Munition Coalition networks. and Eritrea Mine Action Coordination Centre It would also like to thank the following (UNMEE MACC) and Zamanuddin Noori and organizations and individuals for their assis- Olivier Moeckli of the International Committee tance: Albanian Mine Action Executive (AMAE), of the Red Cross (ICRC) in Afghanistan, as well Andrew Wells-Dang and Catholic Relief Services as several people who provided anonymous (CRS) Vietnam, Cambodia Mine UXO Victim information. Information System (CMVIS), Croatian Mine Fatal Footprint: The Global Human Impact of Cluster Munition / 5 Abbreviations and Acronyms AMAE Albanian Mine Action Executive MAC-MACC Mine Action Center/Mine Action AO Aviatsionnaya Oskolochnyang Cell - Mine Action Coordination (Aviation Fragmentation) Centre ARCS Afghan Red Crescent Society MAG Mines Advisory Group BHMAC Bosnia and Herzegovina Mine MCC Mennonite Central Committee Action Center MRE Mine Risk Education BLU Bomb Live Unit NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organization CBU Cluster Bomb Unit NDO National Demining Office CBR Community-Based Rehabilitation NGO Non-Governmental Organization CCW Convention on Certain NMAA National Mine Action Authority Conventional Weapons NRA National Regulatory Authority CEM Combined Effects Munition OKPCC Office of Kosovo Protection Corps CMC Cluster Munition Coalition Coordinator CMVIS Cambodia Mine UXO Victim PTAB Protivotankovaya Aviatsionnaya Information System Bomba (Anti-tank Aviation Bomb) CPI Clear Path International TMAC Tajik Mine Action Cell CROMAC Croatian Mine Action Center UN United Nations Dispenser Container or bomb from which UNDP United Nations Development submunitions are ejected Programme DPICM Dual-Purpose Improved UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund Conventional Munitions UNIDIR United Nations Institute for EOD Explosive Ordnance Disposal Disarmament Research ERW Explosive Remnants of War UNMACA UN Mine Action Center for Footprint Extent of surface area covered by a Afghanistan cluster munitions strike UNMIK United Nations Mission in Kosovo GICHD Geneva International Centre for UNOPS United Nations Office for Project Humanitarian Demining Services HI Handicap International UNMAO United Nations Mine Action Office HRW Human Rights Watch UNMEE United Nations Mission in Ethiopia ICBL International Campaign to Ban and Eritrea Landmines UXO Unexploded Ordnance ICRC International Committee of the VVAF Vietnam Veterans of America Red Cross Foundation IDP Internally Displaced Person IHSCO Iraqi Health and Social Care Organization IMSMA Information Management System for Mine Action KISR Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research LMA UK Landmine Action UK LIS Landmine Impact Survey 6 / Fatal Footprint: The Global Human Impact of Cluster Munitions Introduction he July-August 2006 Lebanon conflict to ensure success, creating wider and overlap- drew widespread attention to the long- ping contamination. Within the footprint, sub- T term impact of cluster munitions on civil- munitions indiscriminately kill and injure mili- ian populations. Calls for a ban of this indis- tary targets and civilians. criminate weapon are becoming louder. One country – Belgium – has already taken this step, Even when accepting the low official failure adopting legislation supported by Handicap rates of optimal test conditions, large numbers International, and initiatives are underway in at of submunitions fail to explode upon impact. In least eight other countries. reality, failure rates are often significantly high- er due to soil and weather conditions, as well as As in the case of Lebanon, previous usage of incorrect delivery and frequent malfunctioning cluster munitions has sparked eloquent verbal of self-destruct and self-neutralization mecha- condemnations and has been at the forefront of nisms, as was seen in Lebanon. Consequently, intermittent international interest and activism a fatal footprint remains until all deadly debris since the first extensive utilization in South- is cleared and the actual strike is only the start- east Asia in the 1960-70s. Since then – like the ing point of the long-lasting harm the weapon items themselves – the issue of cluster muni- can cause. tions and their impact lay largely dormant until the outbreak of the Balkan and Gulf conflicts. Yet, unlike the initial blasts, the effects of unex- However, for more than 30 years, states failed ploded submunitions do seem more discrimi- to address the lasting humanitarian impact of nate; affecting many more civilians than mili- cluster munitions. tary personnel, killing and injuring children at play, families returning after war and young More than half a century has passed since the men and women in the course of their daily design and first use of cluster munitions. lives, as well as those clearing failed submuni- Ensuing decades have seen both the number of tions and peacekeepers. casualties mount, and the use of these muni- tions proliferate. Spreading through new con- Unlike many instances of production, stockpil- flicts to destroy lives, disrupt communities, and ing and combat use, the human impact during deny vulnerable populations’ access to and after the conflict have not been routinely resources needed for economic recovery, clus- recorded nor publicized. As a result, the full ter munitions simultaneously assure both a scope of the problem is largely unknown and costly and lethal legacy of war for post-conflict undervalued. generations. Fatal Footprint: The Global Human Impact of Cluster munitions are imprecise weapons, Cluster Munitions is an unprecedented prelimi- designed to strike a greater surface area than nary effort to document the impact of cluster many other conventional weapons by dispers- munitions on the lives of people in 23 countries ing smaller yet highly lethal explosive submuni- and areas that are not internationally recog- tions. The cluster submunitions scattered on nized, which are confirmed to be affected by the surface create a ‘footprint’. The footprint of cluster munitions. Despite its preliminary char- a single cluster munitions strike is often hun- acter, this report is the first comprehensive dreds of meters wide, and more than 1,000 sub- study systematically analyzing the impact of munitions can be dispensed at a time. cluster munitions on civilian populations Oftentimes, targets are struck more than once through casualty data. It utilizes the limited Fatal Footprint: The Global Human Impact of Cluster Munition / 7 information available on casualties of cluster submunitions to track the human impact from the initial cluster munitions strikes, over the short-term post-strike emergency phase, to the post-conflict period, which can
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Victims Assistance Factsheet
    FACTSHEETS How to implement victim assistance obligations? UNDER THE MINE BAN TREATY OR THE CONVENTION ON CLUSTER MUNITIONS Concrete actions to improve the quality of life of victims and persons with disabilities VICTIM ASSISTANCE FACTSHEETS INTRODUCTION Assistance to victims of mine/explosive remnants of war (ERW) is an obligation for States Parties to the Mine Ban Treaty (MBT) and the Convention on Cluster Munitions (CCM). The Cartagena Action Plan and the Vientiane Action Plan include specific commitments that States Parties have agreed on to implement their victim assistance (VA) obligations effectively, in particular to improve the quality of life of victims. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) provides the most comprehensive framework to address the needs & advances the rights of all persons with disabilities (PwD), including mine/ERW survivors. Regional frameworks on disability and development are also relevant, such as the Incheon Strategy to “Make the Right Real” for Persons with Disability in Asia and the Pacificand the African Decade of Persons with Disabilities. OBJECTIVE OF THESE FACTSHEETS The Victim Assistance Factsheets were developed by Handicap International (HI) as a tool to provide concise information on what victim assistance (VA) is and on how to translate it into concrete actions that have the potential to improve the quality of life of mine/ERW victims and persons with disabilities. The factsheets target States Parties affected by mine/ERW, States Parties in a position to provide assistance, as well as organizations of survivors and other PwD, and other civil society - and international organizations. METHODOLOGY The factsheets build on a review of existing literature on VA, Disability and Inclusive Development, including publications such as the WHO Community-Based Rehabilitation Guidelines, sector and country-specific publications by HI, as well as others by the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention Implementation Support Unit, the ICRC and other organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Cluster Weapons – Military Utility and Alternatives
    FFI-rapport/2007/02345 Cluster weapons – military utility and alternatives Ove Dullum Forsvarets forskningsinstitutt/Norwegian Defence Research Establishment (FFI) 1 February 2008 FFI-rapport 2007/02345 Oppdrag 351301 ISBN 978-82-464-1318-1 Keywords Militære operasjoner / Military operations Artilleri / Artillery Flybomber / Aircraft bombs Klasevåpen / Cluster weapons Ammunisjon / Ammunition Approved by Ove Dullum Project manager Jan Ivar Botnan Director of Research Jan Ivar Botnan Director 2 FFI-rapport/2007/02345 English summary This report is made through the sponsorship of the Royal Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Its purpose is to get an overview of the military utility of cluster munitions, and to find to which degree their capacity can be substituted by current conventional weapons or weapons that are on the verge of becoming available. Cluster munition roughly serve three purposes; firstly to defeat soft targets, i e personnel; secondly to defeat armoured of light armoured vehicles; and thirdly to contribute to the suppressive effect, i e to avoid enemy forces to use their weapons without inflicting too much damage upon them. The report seeks to quantify the effect of such munitions and to compare this effect with that of conventional weapons and more modern weapons. The report discusses in some detail how such weapons work and which effect they have against different targets. The fragment effect is the most important one. Other effects are the armour piercing effect, the blast effect, and the incendiary effect. Quantitative descriptions of such effects are usually only found in classified literature. However, this report is exclusively based on unclassified sources. The availability of such sources has been sufficient to get an adequate picture of the effect of such weapons.
    [Show full text]
  • Front Cover: Airbus 2050 Future Concept Aircraft
    AEROSPACE 2017 February 44 Number 2 Volume Society Royal Aeronautical www.aerosociety.com ACCELERATING INNOVATION WHY TODAY IS THE BEST TIME EVER TO BE AN AEROSPACE ENGINEER February 2017 PROPELLANTLESS SPACE DRIVES – FLIGHTS OF FANCY? BOOM PLOTS RETURN TO SUPERSONIC FLIGHT INDIA’S NAVAL AIR POWER Have you renewed your Membership Subscription for 2017? Your membership subscription was due on 1 January 2017. As per the Society’s Regulations all How to renew: membership benefits will be suspended where Online: a payment for an individual subscription has Log in to your account on the Society’s www.aerosociety.com not been received after three months of the due website to pay at . If you date. However, this excludes members paying do not have an account, you can register online their annual subscriptions by Direct Debits in and pay your subscription straight away. monthly installments. Additionally members Telephone: Call the Subscriptions Department who are entitled to vote in the Society’s AGM on +44 (0)20 7670 4315 / 4304 will lose their right to vote if their subscription has not been paid. Cheque: Cheques should be made payable to the Royal Aeronautical Society and sent to the Don’t lose out on your membership benefits, Subscriptions Department at No.4 Hamilton which include: Place, London W1J 7BQ, UK. • Your monthly subscription to AEROSPACE BACS Transfer: Pay by Bank Transfer (or by magazine BACS) into the Society’s bank account, quoting • Use of your RAeS post nominals as your name and membership number. Bank applicable details: • Over 400 global events yearly • Discounted rates for conferences Bank: HSBC plc • Online publications including Society News, Sort Code: 40-05-22 blogs and podcasts Account No: 01564641 • Involvement with your local branch BIC: MIDLGB2107K • Networking opportunities IBAN: GB52MIDL400522 01564641 • Support gaining Professional Registration • Opportunities & recognition with awards and medals • Professional development and support ..
    [Show full text]
  • States' Commitment to Conventional Weapons Destruction F United
    Documenting the United States’ Commitment to Conventional Weapons Destruction 20Year To Walk The Earth August 2013 In Safety FY2012 United States Department of State | Bureau of Political-Military Affairs U.S. Contributions Country Programs Organization Profiles 180 165 150 135 120 105 90 75 60 45 30 15 0 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 120 135 150 165 180 ON THE COVERS Table of Contents General Information 20 Years of U.S. Commitment to CWD ��������������������������������������������������������������������������4 Conventional Weapons Destruction Overview ����������������������������������������������������������������6 FY2012 Grantees �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 58 List of Common Acronyms . 60 FY2012 Funding Chart �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 61 U.S. Government Interagency Partners 75 Female deminers prepare for work in Sri Lanka. CDC �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 53 Sri Lanka is contaminated by landmines and ex- MANPADS Task Force . 56 plosive remnants of war from over three decades PM/WRA . 13 of armed conflict. From FY2002–FY2012 the U.S. has invested more than $35 million in convention- USAID ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 45 al weapons destruction programs in Sri Lanka. Photo courtesy of Sean Sutton/MAG. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DTRA .
    [Show full text]
  • Cluster Munition Monitor 2018
    CLUSTER MUNITION MONITOR 2018 Monitoring and Research Committee, ICBL-CMC Governance Board Danish Demining Group Human Rights Watch Humanity & Inclusion (HI) Mines Action Canada Research team leaders ICBL-CMC staff experts © August 2018 by International Campaign to Ban Landmines – Cluster Munition Coalition (ICBL-CMC). All rights reserved. ISBN: 978-2-9701146-3-5 Front cover photograph © Sean Sutton/MAG, March 2017 Back cover photographs © Sean Sutton/MAG, March 2017 and Blaise Kormann/HI, July 2017 Cover, text design, and layout by Lixar I.T. Inc. Landmine and Cluster Munition Monitor provides research and monitoring for the Cluster Munition Coalition (CMC) and the International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL) and is a formal program of the ICBL-CMC. For more information visit www.the-monitor.org or email [email protected]. Landmine and Cluster Munition Monitor makes an effort to limit the environmental footprint of reports by publishing all of our research reports online. This report is available online. Detailed country profiles are available online at www.the-monitor.org/cp CLUSTER MUNITION COALITION The Cluster Munition Coalition (CMC) is an international civil society campaign working to eradicate cluster munitions and prevent further harm from these weapons. The CMC works through its members to change the policy and practice of governments and organizations and to raise awareness of the devastation that cluster munitions cause The CMC is committed to the 2008 Convention on Cluster Munitions as the best framework for ending the use, production, stockpiling, and transfer of cluster munitions and for destroying stockpiles, clearing contaminated areas, and assisting affected communities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Raf Harrier Story
    THE RAF HARRIER STORY ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY 2 The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the contributors concerned and are not necessarily those held by the Royal Air Force Historical Society. Copyright 2006: Royal Air Force Historical Society First published in the UK in 2006 by the Royal Air Force Historical Society All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the Publisher in writing. ISBN 0-9530345-2-6 Printed by Advance Book Printing Unit 9 Northmoor Park Church Road Northmoor OX29 5UH 3 ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY President Marshal of the Royal Air Force Sir Michael Beetham GCB CBE DFC AFC Vice-President Air Marshal Sir Frederick Sowrey KCB CBE AFC Committee Chairman Air Vice-Marshal N B Baldwin CB CBE FRAeS Vice-Chairman Group Captain J D Heron OBE Secretary Group Captain K J Dearman Membership Secretary Dr Jack Dunham PhD CPsychol AMRAeS Treasurer J Boyes TD CA Members Air Commodore H A Probert MBE MA *J S Cox Esq BA MA *Dr M A Fopp MA FMA FIMgt *Group Captain N Parton BSc (Hons) MA MDA MPhil CEng FRAeS RAF *Wing Commander D Robertson RAF Wing Commander C Cummings Editor & Publications Wing Commander C G Jefford MBE BA Manager *Ex Officio 4 CONTENTS EARLY HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVES AND EMERGING 8 STAFF TARGETS by Air Chf Mshl Sir Patrick Hine JET LIFT by Prof John F Coplin 14 EVOLUTION OF THE PEGASUS VECTORED
    [Show full text]
  • Conventional Weapons
    ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY JOURNAL 45 2 The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the contributors concerned and are not necessarily those held by the Royal Air Force Historical Society. First published in the UK in 2009 by the Royal Air Force Historical Society All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the Publisher in writing. ISSN 1361 4231 Printed by Windrush Group Windrush House Avenue Two Station Lane Witney OX28 4XW 3 ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY President Marshal of the Royal Air Force Sir Michael Beetham GCB CBE DFC AFC Vice-President Air Marshal Sir Frederick Sowrey KCB CBE AFC Committee Chairman Air Vice-Marshal N B Baldwin CB CBE FRAeS Vice-Chairman Group Captain J D Heron OBE Secretary Group Captain K J Dearman FRAeS Membership Secretary Dr Jack Dunham PhD CPsychol AMRAeS Treasurer J Boyes TD CA Members Air Commodore G R Pitchfork MBE BA FRAes *J S Cox Esq BA MA *Dr M A Fopp MA FMA FIMgt *Group Captain A J Byford MA MA RAF *Wing Commander P K Kendall BSc ARCS MA RAF Wing Commander C Cummings Editor & Publications Wing Commander C G Jefford MBE BA Manager *Ex Officio 4 CONTENTS RFC BOMBS & BOMBING 1912-1918 by AVM Peter Dye 8 THE DEVELOPMENT OF RAF BOMBS, 1919-1939 by 15 Stuart Hadaway RAF BOMBS AND BOMBING 1939-1945 by Nina Burls 25 THE DEVELOPMENT OF RAF GUNS AND 37 AMMUNITION FROM WORLD WAR 1 TO THE
    [Show full text]
  • New Technology for NATO: Implementing Follow-On Forces Attack
    New Technology for NATO: Implementing Follow-On Forces Attack June 1987 NTIS order #PB87-200267 Recommended Citation: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, New Technology for NATO: Im- plementing Follow-On Force Attack, OTA-ISC-309 (Washington, DC: U.S. Gov- ernment Printing Office, June 1987). Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 87-619814 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402-9325 (order form on p. 231) Foreword The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) has been wrestling with a fundamental dilemma: how, within the confines of a strategy constrained by po- litics and geography, to maintain deterrence against the numerically superior and increasingly technically sophisticated forces of the Warsaw Pact. Nuclear weapons underpin NATO’s deterrent, but Alliance military planners are uncomfortable with the prospect of a conventional defense that could be overwhelmed so rapidly as to require early resort to nuclear weapons. Under the leadership of the Supreme Allied Commander, Europe (SACEUR), General Bernard W. Rogers, NATO has sought to remedy this situation by exploiting a broad range of emerging technol- ogies to enable it to effectively attack the follow-on forces of a Warsaw Pact offensive—those ground forces that would extend and support the successes of the initial attackers against NATO’s defenders—and thus help even the odds on those fronts where armies are actually engaged. The adoption of the Follow-On Forces Attack (FOFA) concept has raised a number of serious, complicated, and interrelated issues for the United States and the other members of NATO. The range of issues is broad—encompassing politi- cal, military, and technological questions—although no single issue is dramatic enough to garner headlines in any but the most specialized press.
    [Show full text]
  • Germany Signed: 3 December 2008 Ratified: 8 July 2009 Entered Into Force: 1 August 2010
    Last updated: 19 September 2019 Germany Signed: 3 December 2008 Ratified: 8 July 2009 Entered into force: 1 August 2010 Article 3 - Stockpile destruction and retention Completed destruction of its cluster munition stockpiles in November 2015 Has retained some cluster munitions for training purposes in accordance with Article 3.6 Article 4 - Clearance and risk reduction education Clearance obligation deadline: 1 August 2020, extended to 1 August 2025 Estimated contaminated area: 11 million m2 Total of 1.452 million m2 cleared in 2017 and 2018 Submitted extension request that was considered at the 9MSP; analysis of the request can be found here Article 5 - Victim assistance Does not have cluster munition victims Article 6 - International cooperation and assistance Provided financial assistance in 2018 for mine action (including cluster munitions) to: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cambodia, Colombia, Iraq, Myanmar, Somalia, South Sudan, Syria, Ukraine, Western Sahara, and Yemen Article 7 - Transparency measures Initial transparency report submitted on 27 January 2011 Annual reports submitted covering: 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2018 Article 9 - National implementation measures Inserted prohibitions on cluster munitions into the War Weapons Control Act in 2009 that includes penal sanctions as required by the CCM Focal point contact details Focal point contact details Capital Geneva Federal Foreign Office: [email protected] Mr. Toralf Pilz: [email protected] Declaration of Compliance with Article 3 of the Convention on Cluster Munitions Submitted by Germany 4 July 2016 I. Declaration of Compliance 1. At the First Review Conference of the Convention on Cluster Munitions, States Parties agreed on the Dubrovnik Action Plan (DAP), contained in the Final Report of 13 October 2015 (CCM/CONF/2015/7).
    [Show full text]
  • A Global Survey Acknowledgements
    A global survey Acknowledgements The United Kingdom Department for International Development (DFID) funded the research and production of this report. Their support is greatly appreciated. The views expressed in this report, including the legal status of any country, territory or area, or of its authorities or armed groups, are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Landmine Action or DFID. Comments, clarifications and corrections from governments and others are welcomed. Written by John Borrie With research assistance from: Richard Liu, Lucien Maire, Vanessa Martin (UNIDIR). Editors: Rosy Cave and Richard Lloyd Published in June 2003 by Landmine Action, 89 Albert Embankment, London SE1 7TP, UK www.landmineaction.org Copyright © Landmine Action 2003 British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data. A catalogue record of this report is available from the British Library. ISBN 0 9536717 5 5 Landmine Action is a not-for-profit company limited by guarantee. Registered in England and Wales no. 3895803. John Borrie is Visiting Research Fellow, UNIDIR Design and print by Calverts 020 7739 1474 Contents Glossary 1. Introduction 3 2. Background 4 3. How ERW can affect communities 8 4. Global overview 10 5. Sub-saharan Africa 16 6. The Americas 27 7. Asia and the Pacific 32 8. Europe, the Caucasus and central Asia 45 9. Middle East and north Africa 58 10. Conclusions 67 Select Bibliography 70 Endnotes 71 Glossary of acronyms and terms Abandoned ordnance: explosive ordnance clearly that UXO-risk education and awareness Landmine Monitor: Landmine Monitor is that has not been prepared for use or used and are important components of demining, and an initiative of the International Campaign to which is not under the control of a party or parties not only physical clearance.
    [Show full text]
  • Harrier Kitography" ~ Graham James
    IPMS(UK) Harrier SIG Read Me "Harrier Kitography" ~ Graham James Version 4-1202H This is the fourth version of the Harrier SIG "Kitography" (previous version V3 issued in May 2011) and has been updated as follows: 1. Corrections to V3 items in error 2. Addition of new items found / released since version 3 3. Single listing of kits, resin and decals, sorted by scale created for easier look-up 4. Data is accurate* as of 1 February 2012 * Accurate as it can be based on the fact I have never seen the majority of these products personally and therefore much of the data has been gleaned from websites. The contents are as follows: A - Kitography B - Books & Journals Updates since the last version have a "y" in the update column Harrier Kitography Version 4-1202H (C) Graham James / IMPS(UK) Harrier SIG Page 1 of 32 IPMS(UK) Harrier SIG A - Kitography Kit / Decals Variant Service Unit / Squadron Aircraft Serial ID Camouflage Scheme Supporting Notes Issued Detail / Supplier Scale Reference Title Availability For Kit Contents Upd Conversion Stores Contents Supporting Notes Issued AV-8A USMC VMA-513 158391 08/WF Airfix Kit 24 Airfix-18001-4 Hawker Harrier Poor Released with MPC label in US 1974 GR1 RAF 1 Sqdn XV788 DG/DSG/LAG AV-8A USMC VMA-513 158961 02/WF Spanish Navy Escuadrilla 8 01-804 Matt Gull Grey / White AV-8S Airfix Kit 24 Airfix-18003 Harrier GR3 AV-8A / AV-8S or Harrier GR3 Poor Thai Navy 310 Sqdn 161174 2000 1453 Flight XV788 L GR3 RAF DG/DSG 4 Sqdn XZ969 D 700A NAS XZ451 100/VL 800 NAS XZ454 250 ESDG/W FRS1 RN 801 NAS XZ493 001/N Airfix
    [Show full text]
  • Kosovo, Nato, and Strategic Bombing
    The Lessons and Non-Lessons of the Air and Missile Campaign in Kosovo Anthony H. Cordesman Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy Revised August, 2000 Copyright Anthony H. Cordesman, all rights reserved. The Air and Missile Campaign in Kosovo 9/17/03 Page ii Table of Contents I. THE LESSONS AND NON-LESSONS OF THE NATO AIR AND MISSILE CAMPAIGN IN KOSOVO .1 II. THE HISTORICAL BACKGROUND: THE COURSE AND CHARACTER OF THE NATO CAMPAIGN .....................................................................................................................................................................................3 BOSNIA AND THE DAYTON ACCORDS BECOME THE PRELUDE TO WAR IN KOSOVO................................................. 4 THE DIPLOMATIC PRELUDE ..................................................................................................................................... 6 PEACE TALKS END IN WAR ................................................................................................................................... 13 Serbia’s Grand Strategic and Tactical Mistakes .............................................................................................13 NATO’s Blundering into Large-Scale War ......................................................................................................14 OPERATION ALLIED FORCE: THE AIR AND MISSILE CAMPAIGN ............................................................................. 16 The Phases and Non-Phases of the Air and Missile Campaign .......................................................................17
    [Show full text]