DOCSLIB.ORG

The Siskiyou Hiker 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

WINTER 2020 THE SISKIYOU HIKER Outdoor news from the Siskiyou backcountry SPECIAL ISSUE: 2020 Stewardship Report Photo by: Trevor Meyer SEASON UPDATES ALL THE TRAILS CLEARED THIS YEAR LOOKING AHEAD CHECK OUT OUR Laina Rose, 2020 Crew Leader PLANS FOR 2021 LETTER FROM THE DIRECTOR Winter, 2020 Dear Friends, In this special issue of the Siskiyou Hiker, we’ve taken our annual stewardship report and wrapped it up into a periodical for your review. Like everyone, 2020 has been a tough year for us. But I hope this issue illustrates that this year was a challenge we were up for. We had to make big changes, including a hiring freeze on interns and seasonals. My staff, board, our volun- teers, and I all had to flex into what roles needed to be filled, and far-ahead planning became almost impossi- ble. But we were able to wrap up technical frontcountry projects in the spring, and finished work on the Briggs Creek Bridge and a long retaining wall on the multi-use Taylor Creek Trail. Then my staff planned for a smaller intern program that was stronger beyond measure. We put practices in place to keep everyone safe, and got through the year intact and in good health. This year we had a greater impact on the lives of the young people who serve on our Wilderness Conserva- tion Corps. They completed media projects and gained technical skills. Everyone pushed themselves and we took the first real steps in realizing greater diversity throughout our organization. And despite protocols in place to slow the spread of Covid-19, we actually grew our volunteer program. Major credit and thanks is due to my staff, our volunteer board of directors, our brave interns, our courageous volun- teers, and our committed supporters. Your support is a bright light in an uncertain world. So thank you. Now enjoy this special issue of the Siskiyou Hiker, and get out to pursue the bounty of your public lands. Always Leave No Trace, and long live the backwoods trails. Sincerely, Gabriel Howe, Executive Director 01 | December, 2020 The places we work: Powers CRATER Ranger District LAKE WILD ROGUE High Cascades Ranger District WILDERNESS PROSPECT pg. 9-10 SKY LAKES WILDERNESS SHADY pg. 17-18 COVE TAYLOR CREEK 62 101 pg. 7 MERLIN GRANTS GOLD BRIGGS CREEK PAS S BEACH pg. 7 140 Gold Beach Ranger District MEDFORD 199 KALMIOPSIS WILDERNESS CAVE pg. 13-14 JUNCTION CASCADE-SISKIYOU OREGON CAVES KLAMATH ASHLAND NAT. M NAT. MON. ON. FALLS Wild Rivers Siskiyou Mountains Ranger District 66 BROOKINGS Oregon Caves Ranger District Visitor Center RED BUTTES WILDERNESS 199 SODA MOUNTAIN pg. 15-16 Gasquet WILDERNESS Ranger District Happy Camp pg. 19-20 Ranger District HAPPY YREKA CRESCENT SISKIYOU CAMP CITY WILDERNESS pg. 11-12 97 96 Salmon/Scott MARBLE MOUNTAIN Ranger District WILDERNESS 101 Photo by: Trevor Meyer Photo by: Trevor Meyer 2020 Stewardship Report | 02 A PROMISE KEPT We kept our promise to perform annual maintenance on at least one third of our 333-miles of adopted trails. TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL VOLUNTEER 1,678 INTERN 3,000 FIELD STAFF 4,500 HOURS HOURS HOURS TOTAL MILES TOTAL MILES MAINTAINED 113 RESTORED 17 Photo by: Nick Hodges “It was definitely a transformative experience. I learned that the best things take the most amount of work and dedication. The more time and effort you put into something, the more rewarding it will be.” Bryson Leander 2020 Intern BEFORE AFTER BEFORE AFTER Upper Chetco Trail #1102, Kalmiopsis Wilderness Clay Hill Trail #1160A, Wild Rogue Wilderness 03 | December 2020 MILES MILES LAST TRAIL NAME & # AREA NOTES MAINTAINED RESTORED WORKED TANNER LAKE TRAIL May have been impacted by 2020 3 RED BUTTES Summer 2020 #1243 Slater Fire SUCKER CREEK TRAIL May have been impacted by 2020 3 RED BUTTES Spring 2020 #1237 Slater Fire BUTTE FORK TRAIL 3.75 RED BUTTES Spring 2020 Good shape #957 HORSE CAMP TRAIL 4 RED BUTTES Spring 2020 Hard to follow in the meadow #958 CAMERON MEADOWS 5 RED BUTTES Fall 2019 Minor brush above Frog Pond TRAIL #953 ROGUE RIVER TRAIL 18 WILD ROGUE Summer 2020 #1160 CLAY HILL TRAIL 4.25 WILD ROGUE Spring 2020 #1160A MULE CREEK TRAIL Minor brush/tread issues about 7 WILD ROGUE Spring 2020 #1159 halfway up DEVILS BACKBONE TRAIL 1.3 WILD ROGUE Summer 2020 #1162 LITTLE CHETCO TRAIL 3 3.5 KALMIOPSIS Summer 2020 #1121 UPPER CHETCO TRAIL Minor brush/tread issues above Box 12 KALMIOPSIS Spring 2020 #1102 Canyon Creek ILLINOIS RIVER TRAIL Some logs down and tread issues 15 KALMIOPSIS Summer 2020 #1161 throughout. Landslide at Silver Creek FLORENCE WAY TRAIL 4 KALMIOPSIS Summer 2020 #1219-A PUPPS CAMP WAY 2 KALMIOPSIS Summer 2020 #1174 SOUTH BEND MTN TRAIL Clear from Polar Spring to Pupps Bryson Leander 1 KALMIOPSIS Summer 2020 2020 Intern #1189 Camp Way junction EMILY CABIN TRAIL 2 2.5 KALMIOPSIS Summer 2020 #1129 SHORTY NOBLE WAY 1 KALMIOPSIS Spring 2020 #1185 RED MOUNTAIN TRAIL Clear from Chetco Divide to Navy 2.5 KALMIOPSIS Summer 2020 #1105 Monument Trail junction E. FORK ILLINOIS RIVER May have been impacted by 2020 4 SISKIYOU Summer 2020 TRAIL #1274 Slater Fire BLACK BUTTE TIE TRAIL May have been impacted by 2020 1.5 SISKIYOU Summer 2020 #1273 Slater Fire OSGOOD DITCH TRAIL May have been impacted by 2020 1.5 SISKIYOU Winter 2019 #1276 Slater Fire FORKS OF BLUE TRAIL Some brush and logs still remain near 7 SISKIYOU Summer 2020 #4E07 E. Fork Blue Creek MIDDLE FORK ROGUE 6 SKY LAKES Summer 2020 TRAIL #978 HALIFAX TRAIL 3 SKY LAKES Summer 2020 Good shape #1088 ALTA LAKE TRAIL 6.5 SKY LAKES Summer 2020 #979 MCKIE CAMP TRAIL Hard to follow in spots near Solace 2.75 SKY LAKES Summer 2020 #1089 Meadow PILOT ROCK TRAIL 2 SODA MOUNTAIN Fall 2019 2020 Stewardship Report | 04 PROMISE KEEPERS Volunteer Crews Volunteer Program Grows Despite complexities associated with safety measures we implemented for Covid-19, 2020 was a strong year for our volunteer program. Karly White took on our volunteer programming, coordinat- ing over 1,700 hours of on-the-ground labor mostly throughout the Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest. “We actually had more volunteers than we did in 2019,” says White. “People were really eager to get out. So we waited until it was safe and exercised caution,” she adds. White says her program stands out because of the wide footprint we cover. A trip that she remembers fondly was in the Kalmi- opsis Wilderness over Memorial Day Photo by: Karly White Weekend. “We worked the most remote section 2017 as an intern,” she notes. “In 2017, it of the Upper Chetco Trail,” she says, • Kalmiopsis: Upper Chetco Trail hadn’t been worked for decades and pointing on the map between Taggart’s #1102, Red Mountain Trail #1105 was in complete shambles. We main- Bar and Box Canyon Creek. “It’s always • Red Buttes: Sucker Creek Trail tain trails on a three year rotation. This passed over because it’s so hard to get #1237, Cameron Meadows #953 year that rotation came up, so I got to to, and it had fallen into bad shape.” She • Sky Lakes: Halifax Trail #1088 see what three years of no maintenance and her volunteers were able to get looks like.” to it. “That was really important,” adds “In the wake of a pandemic, getting out White. Volunteers are responsible for keeping became a really important part of par- up on our maintenance promise, and ticipants’ mental health,” says Gabriel White also had the chance to work this year they completed work through- Howe. “We’re lucky that we can provide on the Halifax Trail. “That was special out our footprint. A few notable projects a safe way to be part of some meaning- for me because I opened that trail in our volunteers completed: ful service.” Field Staff of back-end administrative tasks. During the 12 week Corps program, our Trevor Meyer also started in 2017 and field staff are responsible for ground grew into a full-time position. “The level management of those crews, but bridge and wall were big projects we they continue working throughout the were able to get done with help from year to complete the most technical staff on the Wild Rivers Ranger District,” projects in our hopper. In 2020, they: he says. Meyer remembers walking across the bridge after it had burned. “It • Kalmiopsis: Rebuilt the Briggs was wet and there was hardly anything Creek Bridge to keep you from falling 20 or 30 feet. • Taylor Creek: Built a 2,000ft For the public to be able to cross the retaining wall bridge without having to worry about • Wild Rogue: Maintained the dying is an accomplishment.” Wild Rogue Loop As we look into 2021, we plan on pro- moting two seasonals into permanent Karly White started working in 2017 as positions and building permanent an intern, and grew into a permanent, career tracks for our young staff. full-time position. Now she’s in charge of outreach, volunteers, and taking care 05 | December 2020 Photo by Trevor Meyer Photo by Trevor Meyer Wilderness Conservation Corps Corps Program: Steady and “Being away from the world allowed us Steadfast to more critically analyze what was, and is, still happening.” He says it allowed Our Corps interns receive a monthly him to get a greater depth on the situ- stipend, a scholarship, and free housing ation. “It was like a sabbatical and gave at our Gold Hill facility for their 12 week me more appreciation.” program. This was our first season having one staff member, Trevor Meyer, For intern Gabe Benson of New Jersey, dedicated entirely to the Conservation the project that sticks out most was the Corps program.
Recommended publications
  • Table 8 — National Wilderness Areas in Multiple States

    Table 8 — National Wilderness Areas in Multiple States

    Table 8 - National Wilderness Areas in Multiple States * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary determination + Special Area that is part of a proclaimed National Forest National Wilderness Area State NFS Other Total Unit Name Acreage Acreage Acreage Absaroka-Beartooth Wilderness Montana Custer National Forest* 331,130 1,482 332,612 Gallatin National Forest 582,181 2,657 584,838 Wyoming Shoshone National Forest 23,694 0 23,694 Absaroka-Beartooth Wilderness Totals 937,005 4,139 941,144 Big Frog Wilderness Georgia Chattahoochee National Forest 136 0 136 Tennessee Cherokee National Forest* 7,996 0 7,996 Big Frog Wilderness Totals 8,132 0 8,132 Black Fork Mountain Wilderness Arkansas Ouachita National Forest* 8,249 79 8,328 Oklahoma Ouachita National Forest* 5,098 40 5,138 Black Fork Mountain Wilderness Totals 13,347 119 13,466 Cohutta Wilderness Georgia Chattahoochee National Forest 35,284 9 35,293 Tennessee Cherokee National Forest* 1,746 0 1,746 Cohutta Wilderness Totals 37,030 9 37,039 Ellicott Rock Wilderness Georgia Chattahoochee National Forest 2,023 0 2,023 North Carolina Nantahala National Forest 3,417 0 3,417 South Carolina Sumter National Forest 2,857 9 2,866 Ellicott Rock Wilderness Totals 8,297 9 8,306 Processed Date: 2/5/2014 Table 8 - National Wilderness Areas in Multiple States * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary determination + Special Area that is part of a proclaimed National Forest National Wilderness Area State NFS Other Total Unit Name Acreage Acreage
  • Interior the Following Appropriations Requests Were Submitted by Senator

    Interior the Following Appropriations Requests Were Submitted by Senator

    Interior The following appropriations requests were submitted by Senator Merkley to the Appropriations Committee for consideration as part of the Interior, Environment and Related Agencies appropriations bill for fiscal year 2011. Bend Surface Water Project - $2,000,000 EPA, Bend, OR The Surface Water project has three major components: water treatment, pipeline replacement, and hydroelectric development. Funds will be put toward the estimated overall $71,000,000 cost of the project, which is to construct a water treatment plant, replace an 11 mile water pipeline, and install a small hydroelectric facility, gaining 1.2 MW of green power, further defraying the long term cost of the project. The project is required in order to replace aging infrastructure, and comply with EPA LT2 drinking water regulations governing surface water. Eastside Sewer Interceptor Project: Oak to Antler - $1,375,000 City of Redmond, Redmond, OR The east side of Redmond is poised for significant industrial and commercial growth. The City’s Desert Rise Industrial Park (State Certified, 75 shovel ready acres), Pioneer Business Park (40 acre, incubator lots), Crown Mill redevelopment (70 acre former sawmill), Greenway Business Campus (220 acre ―green-themed‖ re-development) and several other planned development or redevelopment projects exist east of US 97 and the BNSF rail line. Full buildout of the east side industrial development cannot occur without construction of a planned large diameter sewer line which parallels the BNSF rail line and intercepts/collects wastewater effluent from all east side development. The project, known as the Eastside Sewer Interceptor Project, will also have the capacity to serve the potential 900-acre large lot Department of State Land (DSL) project south of the Deschutes County Fairgrounds and Expo Center.
  • Bıoenu V( Land Management in U›E5v›I

    Bıoenu V( Land Management in U›E5v›I

    'Me Wíldemefif Eevíew P›v5›Aın v( tfie Bıoenu v( Land Management in U›e5v›ı _ " ;.` › › __. V L i_ „_ 4 ;' ~ gp ""! ¬~ «nvıvq f 1 -4-" _ ._ , 4_&,;¬__§?~~..„ V ıdı; "^. \-*_ ~¬¬ Q 1.z,“-_ ,._§,.';;.è,;;¶±„»_§ ' 1 4. _ _ı-?L_V wı -_ _` ' “T `;",~=:.f~ "_ ';1f“-=".f=«'í~.'›._ 2* T e \ ' "§11 ` `~. xx« (Part Une) Array Kerr ~OSPlR(5 lrwfr March 19/8 THE WILDERNESS REVIEW PROGRAM OF THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT IN OREGON PART I Andy Kerr OSPIRG Intern March, 1978 This study is dedicated to those Bureau of Land Management personnel who know what is right for the land and are doing their best to see that it is done by the Bureau. They work under difficult circurs'ances. But with them on the inside and us on the outside, changes are being made, Someday they may all come out of the rloset victorious. Copyright l978 by Oregon Student Public Interest Research Group. Individuals may reproduce or quote portions of this handbook For academic or cítizen action uses, but reproduction for commercial purposes is stríctly prohihíted. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I must thank several persons who knowingly, and unknowingly, aided in this study. l'm sure that l'm forgetting some. First the BLM agency people: Ken white and Don Geary (Oregon State Office); Warren Edinger, Ron Rothschadl, and Bob Carothers (Medford District); and Dale Skeesick, Bill Power, Larry Scofield, Jerry Mclntire, Warren Tausch, John Rodosta, Scott Abdon. Jenna Gaston, Karl Bambe, and Paul Kuhns (Salem District). Bob Burkholder (U_S, Fish and Wildlife Service) was most helpful with the Oregon Islands Study.
  • Public Law 111–11 111Th Congress An

    Public Law 111–11 111Th Congress An

    PUBLIC LAW 111–11—MAR. 30, 2009 123 STAT. 991 Public Law 111–11 111th Congress An Act To designate certain land as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System, to authorize certain programs and activities in the Department of the Mar. 30, 2009 Interior and the Department of Agriculture, and for other purposes. [H.R. 146] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, Omnibus Public Land SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. Management Act (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Omnibus of 2009. Public Land Management Act of 2009’’. 16 USC 1 note. (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents of this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. TITLE I—ADDITIONS TO THE NATIONAL WILDERNESS PRESERVATION SYSTEM Subtitle A—Wild Monongahela Wilderness Sec. 1001. Designation of wilderness, Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia. Sec. 1002. Boundary adjustment, Laurel Fork South Wilderness, Monongahela Na- tional Forest. Sec. 1003. Monongahela National Forest boundary confirmation. Sec. 1004. Enhanced Trail Opportunities. Subtitle B—Virginia Ridge and Valley Wilderness Sec. 1101. Definitions. Sec. 1102. Designation of additional National Forest System land in Jefferson Na- tional Forest as wilderness or a wilderness study area. Sec. 1103. Designation of Kimberling Creek Potential Wilderness Area, Jefferson National Forest, Virginia. Sec. 1104. Seng Mountain and Bear Creek Scenic Areas, Jefferson National Forest, Virginia. Sec. 1105. Trail plan and development. Sec. 1106. Maps and boundary descriptions. Sec. 1107. Effective date. Subtitle C—Mt. Hood Wilderness, Oregon Sec.
  • KALMIOPSIS Journal of the Native Plant Society of Oregon

    KALMIOPSIS Journal of the Native Plant Society of Oregon

    KALMIOPSIS Journal of the Native Plant Society of Oregon Kalmiopsis leachiana ISSN 1055-419X Volume 20, 2013 &ôùĄÿĂùñü KALMIOPSIS (irteen years, fourteen issues; that is the measure of how long Journal of the Native Plant Society of Oregon, ©2013 I’ve been editing Kalmiopsis. (is is longer than I’ve lived in any given house or worked for any employer. I attribute this longevity to the lack of deadlines and time clocks and the almost total freedom to create a journal that is a showcase for our state and society. (ose fourteen issues contained 60 articles, 50 book reviews, and 25 tributes to Fellows, for a total of 536 pages. I estimate about 350,000 words, an accumulation that records the stories of Oregon’s botanists, native )ora, and plant communities. No one knows how many hours, but who counts the hours for time spent doing what one enjoys? All in all, this editing gig has been quite an education for me. I can’t think of a more e*ective and enjoyable way to make new friends and learn about Oregon plants and related natural history than to edit the journal of the Native Plant Society of Oregon. Now it is time for me to move on, but +rst I o*er thanks to those before me who started the journal and those who worked with me: the FEJUPSJBMCPBSENFNCFST UIFBVUIPSTXIPTIBSFEUIFJSFYQFSUJTF UIFSFWJFXFST BOEUIF4UBUF#PBSETXIPTVQQPSUFENZXPSL* especially thank those who will follow me to keep this journal &ôùĄÿĂ$JOEZ3PDIÏ 1I% in print, to whom I also o*er my +les of pending manuscripts, UIFTFSWJDFTPGBOFYQFSJFODFEQBHFTFUUFS BSFMJBCMFQSJOUFSBOE &ôùĄÿĂùñü#ÿñĂô mailing service, and the opportunity of a lifetime: editing our +ne journal, Kalmiopsis.
  • A Bill to Designate Certain National Forest System Lands in the State of Oregon for Inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System and for Other Purposes

    A Bill to Designate Certain National Forest System Lands in the State of Oregon for Inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System and for Other Purposes

    97 H.R.7340 Title: A bill to designate certain National Forest System lands in the State of Oregon for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System and for other purposes. Sponsor: Rep Weaver, James H. [OR-4] (introduced 12/1/1982) Cosponsors (2) Latest Major Action: 12/15/1982 Failed of passage/not agreed to in House. Status: Failed to Receive 2/3's Vote to Suspend and Pass by Yea-Nay Vote: 247 - 141 (Record Vote No: 454). SUMMARY AS OF: 12/9/1982--Reported to House amended, Part I. (There is 1 other summary) (Reported to House from the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs with amendment, H.Rept. 97-951 (Part I)) Oregon Wilderness Act of 1982 - Designates as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System the following lands in the State of Oregon: (1) the Columbia Gorge Wilderness in the Mount Hood National Forest; (2) the Salmon-Huckleberry Wilderness in the Mount Hood National Forest; (3) the Badger Creek Wilderness in the Mount Hood National Forest; (4) the Hidden Wilderness in the Mount Hood and Willamette National Forests; (5) the Middle Santiam Wilderness in the Willamette National Forest; (6) the Rock Creek Wilderness in the Siuslaw National Forest; (7) the Cummins Creek Wilderness in the Siuslaw National Forest; (8) the Boulder Creek Wilderness in the Umpqua National Forest; (9) the Rogue-Umpqua Divide Wilderness in the Umpqua and Rogue River National Forests; (10) the Grassy Knob Wilderness in and adjacent to the Siskiyou National Forest; (11) the Red Buttes Wilderness in and adjacent to the Siskiyou
  • A Bibliography of Klamath Mountains Geology, California and Oregon

    A Bibliography of Klamath Mountains Geology, California and Oregon

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY A bibliography of Klamath Mountains geology, California and Oregon, listing authors from Aalto to Zucca for the years 1849 to mid-1995 Compiled by William P. Irwin Menlo Park, California Open-File Report 95-558 1995 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards (or with the North American Stratigraphic Code). Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. PREFACE This bibliography of Klamath Mountains geology was begun, although not in a systematic or comprehensive way, when, in 1953, I was assigned the task of preparing a report on the geology and mineral resources of the drainage basins of the Trinity, Klamath, and Eel Rivers in northwestern California. During the following 40 or more years, I maintained an active interest in the Klamath Mountains region and continued to collect bibliographic references to the various reports and maps of Klamath geology that came to my attention. When I retired in 1989 and became a Geologist Emeritus with the Geological Survey, I had a large amount of bibliographic material in my files. Believing that a comprehensive bibliography of a region is a valuable research tool, I have expended substantial effort to make this bibliography of the Klamath Mountains as complete as is reasonably feasible. My aim was to include all published reports and maps that pertain primarily to the Klamath Mountains, as well as all pertinent doctoral and master's theses.
  • One Hundred Ninth Congress of the United States of America

    One Hundred Ninth Congress of the United States of America

    H. R. 233 One Hundred Ninth Congress of the United States of America AT THE SECOND SESSION Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, the third day of January, two thousand and six An Act To designate certain National Forest System lands in the Mendocino and Six Rivers National Forests and certain Bureau of Land Management lands in Humboldt, Lake, Mendocino, and Napa Counties in the State of California as wilderness, to designate the Elkhorn Ridge Potential Wilderness Area, to designate certain segments of the Black Butte River in Mendocino County, California as a wild or scenic river, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE AND TABLE OF CONTENTS. (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Northern California Coastal Wild Heritage Wilderness Act’’. (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents for this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title and table of contents. Sec. 2. Definition of Secretary. Sec. 3. Designation of wilderness areas. Sec. 4. Administration of wilderness areas. Sec. 5. Release of wilderness study areas. Sec. 6. Elkhorn Ridge Potential Wilderness Area. Sec. 7. Wild and scenic river designation. Sec. 8. King Range National Conservation Area boundary adjustment. Sec. 9. Cow Mountain Recreation Area, Lake and Mendocino Counties, California. Sec. 10. Continuation of traditional commercial surf fishing, Redwood National and State Parks. SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF SECRETARY. In this Act, the term ‘‘Secretary’’ means— (1) with respect to land under the jurisdiction of the Sec- retary of Agriculture, the Secretary of Agriculture; and (2) with respect to land under the jurisdiction of the Sec- retary of the Interior, the Secretary of the Interior.
  • Mazama Research Reports Vol. 1–22PDF Document

    Mazama Research Reports Vol. 1–22PDF Document

    8/13/2020 Reports of Scientific Investigations sponsored by Mazama Research Grants Page 1 REPORTS OF SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATIONS Sponsored by Mazama Research Funds Index to volumes 1-22 and Separate Reports 1-5 8/13/2020 Reports of Scientific Investigations sponsored by Mazama Research Grants Page 2 Table of Contents Volume 3 1. A study of the primary productivity rate of South Volume 1 Cascade Glacier: correlation with ice worm 1. Microenvironmental modifications to favor seed populations. Bland, Jeffrey and Wilson, Kathy germination in distributed sub-alpine 2. Environment of tundra vegetation of Steen’s environments, Mount Rainier National Park, Mountain. Collins, Paul Washington. Ahlstrand, Gary M. 3. The effect of an outdoor experience on self 2. Some effects of snowmobiles in the High attitudes and behavior of mentally retarded Cascades. Bowerman, Jay adults. Fullerton, Ann 3. Glacial geology of the Mountain Lake Wilderness 4. Geology of the Bull of the Woods area. Jackson, and adjacent parts of the Cascade Range, James S. Oregon. Craver, Gary Alan 5. Investigation of the geology structure of Northwest 4. A pilot biological survey of the Sky Lakes Oregon by the interpretations of a gravity Wilderness study area. Cross, Stephen P and traverse southwest of Portland, Oregon, 1977. Lang, Frank A. Jones, Terry 5. High mountain hummingbird feeding territories in 6. Attitude change related to a course in backpacking relation to food supplies. Gass, Lee at the University of Montana. Long, Eleanor 6. A limnological study of Shadow Lake, a subalpine V.1974 late at Mount Rainier National Park, 7. Preliminary report of the 1976 Awlinyak Peaks Washington.
  • OR Wild -Backmatter V2

    OR Wild -Backmatter V2

    208 OREGON WILD Afterword JIM CALLAHAN One final paragraph of advice: do not burn yourselves out. Be as I am — a reluctant enthusiast.... a part-time crusader, a half-hearted fanatic. Save the other half of your- selves and your lives for pleasure and adventure. It is not enough to fight for the land; it is even more important to enjoy it. While you can. While it is still here. So get out there and hunt and fish and mess around with your friends, ramble out yonder and explore the forests, climb the mountains, bag the peaks, run the rivers, breathe deep of that yet sweet and lucid air, sit quietly for awhile and contemplate the precious still- ness, the lovely mysterious and awesome space. Enjoy yourselves, keep your brain in your head and your head firmly attached to the body, the body active and alive and I promise you this much: I promise you this one sweet victory over our enemies, over those desk-bound men with their hearts in a safe-deposit box and their eyes hypnotized by desk calculators. I promise you this: you will outlive the bastards. —Edward Abbey1 Edward Abbey. Ed, take it from another Ed, not only can wilderness lovers outlive wilderness opponents, we can also defeat them. The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men (sic) UNIVERSITY, SHREVEPORT UNIVERSITY, to do nothing. MES SMITH NOEL COLLECTION, NOEL SMITH MES NOEL COLLECTION, MEMORIAL LIBRARY, LOUISIANA STATE LOUISIANA LIBRARY, MEMORIAL —Edmund Burke2 JA Edmund Burke. 1 Van matre, Steve and Bill Weiler.
  • Or Wilderness-Like Areas, but Instead Declassified Previously Protected Wildlands with High Timber Value

    Or Wilderness-Like Areas, but Instead Declassified Previously Protected Wildlands with High Timber Value

    48 OREGON WILD A Brief Political History of Oregon’s Wilderness Protections Government protection should be thrown around every wild grove and forest on the Although the Forest Service pioneered the concept of wilderness protection in the mountains, as it is around every private orchard, and trees in public parks. To say 1920s and 1930s, by the late 1940s and 1950s, it was methodically undoing whatever nothing of their values as fountains of timber, they are worth infinitely more than all good it had done earlier by declassifying administrative wilderness areas that contained the gardens and parks of town. any commercial timber. —John Muir1 Just prior to the end of its second term, and after receiving over a million public comments in support of protecting national forest roadless areas, the Clinton Administration promulgated a regulation (a.k.a. “the Roadless Rule”) to protect the Inadequacies of Administrative remaining unprotected wildlands (greater than 5,000 acres in size) in the National Forest System from road building and logging. At the time, Clinton’s Forest Service Protections chief Mike Dombeck asked rhetorically: here is “government protection,” and then there is government protection. Mere public ownership — especially if managed by the Bureau of Is it worth one-quarter of 1 percent of our nation’s timber supply or a fraction of a Land Management — affords land little real or permanent protection. fraction of our oil and gas to protect 58.5 million acres of wild and unfragmented land T National forests enjoy somewhat more protection than BLM lands, but in perpetuity?2 to fully protect, conserve and restore federal forests often requires a combination of Wilderness designation and additional appropriate congressional Dombeck’s remarks echoed those of a Forest Service scientist from an earlier era.
  • Public Law 98-328-June 26, 1984

    Public Law 98-328-June 26, 1984

    98 STAT. 272 PUBLIC LAW 98-328-JUNE 26, 1984 Public Law 98-328 98th Congress An Act June 26, 1984 To designate certain national forest system and other lands in the State of Oregon for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System, and for other purposes. [H.R. 1149] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the Oregon United States ofAmerica in Congress assembled, That this Act may Wilderness Act be referred to as the "Oregon Wilderness Act of 1984". of 1984. National SEc. 2. (a) The Congress finds that- Wilderness (1) many areas of undeveloped National Forest System land in Preservation the State of Oregon possess outstanding natural characteristics System. which give them high value as wilderness and will, if properly National Forest preserved, contribute as an enduring resource of wilderness for System. the ben~fit of the American people; (2) the Department of Agriculture's second roadless area review and evaluation (RARE II) of National Forest System lands in the State of Oregon and the related congressional review of such lands have identified areas which, on the basis of their landform, ecosystem, associated wildlife, and location, will help to fulfill the National Forest System's share of a quality National Wilderness Preservation System; and (3) the Department of Agriculture's second roadless area review and evaluation of National Forest System lands in the State of Oregon and the related congressional review of such lands have also identified areas which do not possess outstand­ ing wilderness attributes or which possess outstanding energy, mineral, timber, grazing, dispersed recreation and other values and which should not now be designated as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System but should be avail­ able for nonwilderness multiple uses under the land manage­ ment planning process and other applicable laws.