Popular Radicals and the Liberal Party in Mid-Victorian Britain

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Popular Radicals and the Liberal Party in Mid-Victorian Britain Out Of Chartism, intO LIberalism? Popular Radicals and the LIberal Party in Mid-Victorian Britain One of the most he ‘Age of the Char- structural explanations have fallen tists’ was the golden age from favour, which, to a new remarkable political of popular protest, of generation of post-Marxist, post- developments crowds meeting in town Modernist historians, seem rather squares, public parks crude and simplistic. In seeking to during the first half Tand on moorland summits (some- explain the rise of popular Liber- times with weapons and under the alism, revisionist historians have of the nineteenth protective cover of darkness) to rejected social explanations and century was the rise demand their democratic rights. have turned their attention back So unnerved were the state and to politics itself.1 of a more coherent, the propertied classes that forces This article develops this pol- of surveillance and suppression itics-centred approach by paying organised and assertive were unleashed on the Chartists attention to some of the ways in popular radicalism, which – along with internal divi- which the Liberal Party was able sions and the failure after ten years to use ideas, values and beliefs culminating in the to secure the enactment of the to construct broad-based coali- coveted ‘People’s Charter’ – led to tions of supporters. Whilst agree- Chartist movement the decline of the movement after ing with the renewed emphasis 1848. which has been placed on the of the late 1830s and In contrast to the tumult of the importance of political ideas, this 1840s. Matthew early-Victorian years, the mid- article lends further weight to a Victorian decades were tranquil. growing body of post-revisionist Roberts examines Politically, this ‘Age of Equipoise’ work which has reemphasised manifested itself in the constitu- just how painful and protracted the ways in which encies in the rise of popular Lib- the transition was from Chart- the nascent Liberal eralism, based on a coalition of ism into Liberalism, a process ex-Chartists (popular Radicals) that was fraught with tension and Party was able to use and Liberals. But why did these liable to break down.2 The first popular Radicals and Liberals, section of the article surveys the the ideas, values and after two decades of conflict with various explanations of mid-cen- beliefs of the Chartists one another, agree to cooperate? tury political stability which have Historians have been divided. It been put forward by historians and other Radicals to used to be argued that this trans- and relates these to the debates formation was largely the result of on the rise of popular Liberalism. construct broad-based underlying changes in the struc- The second section looks at what coalitions of support ture and outlook of the working Liberals and popular Radicals class: rising real wages, greater were able to agree on by focusing – a process which was job security, the rise of an influ- on some of the key political issues ential and politically moderate of the day in the mid-Victorian fraught with tension group of ‘labour aristocrats’, and decades. While the third section and liable to break the splintering of the working highlights some of the differences class in terms of occupation, status of opinion and conflict over down at any time. and culture. More recently, these principles which bedevilled the 6 Journal of Liberal History 67 Summer 2010 Out Of Chartism, intO LIberalism? Popular Radicals and the LIberal Party in Mid-Victorian Britain popular Liberal coalition during its revolutionary destiny in the Great Chartist began to decrease and real wages this period. 1840s, abandoned its mission and Meeting on began to rise, thus limiting the Why did the confronta- reconciled itself to the established Kennington appeal of a radical politics based tional politics of Chartism give order. A whole range of ‘consola- Common, on ‘hunger and hatred’.3 The ris- way to the relatively harmoni- tory’ explanations were advanced 10 April 1848 ing profit margins of the manu- ous and compromising politics to explain this apparent ‘false (this and facturing middle class allowed it of moderate reformism? This consciousness’, most of which accompanying to engage in a variety of practices, question was central to the Marx- highlighted the socio-economic daguerrotypes the objective of which was to ist inspired historiography of foundations of mid-century sta- were the first reshape the workers in their own the 1960s and 1970s, not least bility. Against the background ever taken of a image in the workplace (by cre- because it presented Marxists of economic recovery in the late crowd scene) ating an elite stratum of workers with the uncomfortable question 1840s and the boom conditions of – labour aristocrats – to control of why the working class, hav- the 1850s, social tensions began to the rest of the workforce, and by ing come so close to achieving lessen as cyclical unemployment engaging in paternalistic practices Journal of Liberal History 67 Summer 2010 7 Out Of chartism, intO liberalism? to keep the rest of the workforce Chartists turned away from poli- to the privations of the masses. So content) and in the community tics altogether, channelling their powerful was Chartism’s critique (by sponsoring rational recrea- efforts into cooperatives, friendly of the state as utterly partial and tion). Whatever the cause, the societies and trades unions.8 Now, negligent that it undoubtedly effect was the same: the dilution of the fact that many ex-Chartists played a significant part in mak- working-class radicalism.4 turned their backs on politics ing the state more responsive to In more recent times, histo- might account, to some extent, for popular grievances. True, the rians have become increasingly the political stability of these years state responded largely on its own sceptical of the explanatory value by virtue of their absence, but it terms, and in a way that did not of structural interpretations of cannot explain why many of those look like a direct concession to mid-century stability. To take one Radical activists who remained Chartism (which, for obvious rea- example, it is surely not possible to convinced of the efficacy of politi- sons, it could not be seen to do). explain the rejection by the work- cal solutions attempted to coop- Where the Chartists were proved ing class of the far-reaching goals erate, when possible, with the wrong was in their claim that the of Chartism by focusing on the Liberal Party. And neither can state was incapable of reforming privileges of a few labour aristo- employer paternalism explain itself without being democra- crats who may, or may not, have why members of the working tised, which has led some histo- exercised a moderating influence class seemingly moderated their rians to argue that Chartism had over the rest of the workforce. politics. As recent work has made been ideologically bankrupt all Even during its interpretative clear, even when employers did along.11 But, surely, it would have heyday, critics of the labour aris- practise paternalism towards their been naive of the Chartists to have tocracy thesis pointed out that the workforce (and it is worth point- presumed otherwise. Without the widespread existence of a skilled ing out that many employers sim- threat of democratisation at the labour force was hardly a novelty ply could not afford to do so, or, back of the minds of the political in the mid-Victorian decades, that at any rate, not on any significant elite, the state would never have it was difficult to pinpoint which scale), working-class employees reformed itself in the way that it workers were labour aristocrats did not necessarily vote at the did. Secondly, just as the state had as there was no sharp division behest of their lords and masters.9 been unnerved so too had the between them and the rest of the Consequently, these structural propertied classes. Chartism had working class, and that it was sim- explanations can only be made to jolted urban Liberals (and Tories) plistic and reductionist to try and explain so much. As a growing out of their complacency and con- map values like respectability on number of historians have come vinced many of their leaders that to particular sections of the work- to appreciate, a more satisfac- social conditions would have to be ing class. In addition, if labour tory explanation of mid-century improved if a return to unrest was aristocrats really were that privi- political stability and the rise of to be prevented. Thus, urban Lib- leged and went to such lengths to popular Liberalism is to be found It used to be erals became less dogmatic in their distinguish themselves from the by focusing on political change argued that commitment to the strictures wider working class, are we really itself. After all, the transition from of political economy.12 As Mark to believe that they exercised such Chartism to popular Liberalism the rise of Hovell observed many years ago, an influential position?5 Similar was a political development. We Chartism gave Liberalism ‘a wider arguments can also be levelled at cannot read off the trajectory of a more cau- and more popular outlook’.13 On middle-class ‘moral imperialism’. popular politics from the state of the other side, growing numbers Middle-class sponsored initiatives the economy. If such a correla- tious and of Radicals were also coming such as improvement societies tion existed between economic round to the idea of moderate, were often shunned, subverted or depression and the popularity moderate piecemeal reform and to the need hijacked by workers who, in any of Chartism then how can we to cooperate with Liberals (and to case, had their own versions of explain the collapse of Chartism organised a lesser extent Tories) to secure it, respectability and independence.6 in 1842 amidst continued poverty although it took some longer than Even where attempts to mould and unemployment, or Chartism’s labour move- others.
Recommended publications
  • Reactionary Postmodernism? Neoliberalism, Multiculturalism, the Internet, and the Ideology of the New Far Right in Germany
    University of Vermont ScholarWorks @ UVM UVM Honors College Senior Theses Undergraduate Theses 2018 Reactionary Postmodernism? Neoliberalism, Multiculturalism, the Internet, and the Ideology of the New Far Right in Germany William Peter Fitz University of Vermont Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/hcoltheses Recommended Citation Fitz, William Peter, "Reactionary Postmodernism? Neoliberalism, Multiculturalism, the Internet, and the Ideology of the New Far Right in Germany" (2018). UVM Honors College Senior Theses. 275. https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/hcoltheses/275 This Honors College Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Undergraduate Theses at ScholarWorks @ UVM. It has been accepted for inclusion in UVM Honors College Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ UVM. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REACTIONARY POSTMODERNISM? NEOLIBERALISM, MULTICULTURALISM, THE INTERNET, AND THE IDEOLOGY OF THE NEW FAR RIGHT IN GERMANY A Thesis Presented by William Peter Fitz to The Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of The University of Vermont In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements For the Degree of Bachelor of Arts In European Studies with Honors December 2018 Defense Date: December 4th, 2018 Thesis Committee: Alan E. Steinweis, Ph.D., Advisor Susanna Schrafstetter, Ph.D., Chairperson Adriana Borra, M.A. Table of Contents Introduction 1 Chapter One: Neoliberalism and Xenophobia 17 Chapter Two: Multiculturalism and Cultural Identity 52 Chapter Three: The Philosophy of the New Right 84 Chapter Four: The Internet and Meme Warfare 116 Conclusion 149 Bibliography 166 1 “Perhaps one will view the rise of the Alternative for Germany in the foreseeable future as inevitable, as a portent for major changes, one that is as necessary as it was predictable.
    [Show full text]
  • Class Struggles in France 1848-1850
    Karl Marx The Class Struggles in France, 1848-1850 Written: December January-October 1850; Published: as a booklet by Engels in 1895; Source: Selected Works, Volume 1, Progress Publishers, Moscow 1969; Proofed: and corrected by Matthew Carmody, 2009, Mark Harris 2010; Transcribed: by Louis Proyect. Table of Contents Introduction (Engels, 1895) ......................................................................................................... 1 Part I: The Defeat of June 1848 ................................................................................................. 15 Part II: From June 1848 to June 13, 1849 .................................................................................. 31 Part III: Consequences of June 13, 1849 ................................................................................... 50 Part IV: The Abolition of Universal Suffrage in 1850 .............................................................. 70 Introduction (Engels, 1895)1 The work republished here was Marx’s first attempt to explain a piece of contemporary history by means of his materialist conception, on the basis of the prevailing economic situation. In the Communist Manifesto, the theory was applied in broad outline to the whole of modern history; in the articles by Marx and myself in the Neue Rheinische Zeitung, it was constantly used to interpret political events of the day. Here, on the other hand, the question was to demonstrate the inner causal connection in the course of a development which extended over some years, a development
    [Show full text]
  • The Identification of Radicals in the British Parliament
    1 HANSEN 0001 040227 名城論叢 2004年3月 31 THE IDENTIFICATION OF ‘RADICALS’ IN THE BRITISH PARLIAMENT, 1906-1914 P.HANSEN INTRODUCTION This article aims to identify the existence of a little known group of minority opinion in British society during the Edwardian Age. It is an attempt to define who the British Radicals were in the parliaments during the years immediately preceding the Great War. Though some were particularly interested in the foreign policy matters of the time,it must be borne in mind that most confined their energies to promoting the Liberal campaign for domestic welfare issues. Those considered or contemporaneously labelled as ‘Radicals’held ‘leftwing’views, being politically somewhat just left of centre. They were not revolutionaries or communists. They wanted change through reforms carried out in a democratic manner. Their failure to carry out changes on a significant scale was a major reason for the decline of the Liberals,and the rise and ultimate success of the Labour Party. Indeed, following the First World War, many Radicals defected from the Liberal Party to join Labour. With regard to historiography,it can be stated that the activities of British Radicals from the turn of the century to the outbreak of the First World War were the subject of interest to the most famous British historian of the second half of the 20century, A. J. P. Taylor. He wrote of them in his work The Troublemakers based on his Ford Lectures of 1956. By the early 1970s’A.J.A.Morris had established a reputation in the field with his book Radicalism Against War, 1906-1914 (1972),and a further publication of which he was editor,Edwardian Radical- ism 1900-1914 (1974).
    [Show full text]
  • Tempered Radicals and Servant Leaders: Portraits of Spirited Leadership Amongst African Women Leaders
    TEMPERED RADICALS AND SERVANT LEADERS: PORTRAITS OF SPIRITED LEADERSHIP AMONGST AFRICAN WOMEN LEADERS Faith Wambura Ngunjiri A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF EDUCATION May 2006 Committee: Judy A. Alston, Advisor Laura B. Lengel Graduate Faculty Representative Mark A. Earley Khaula Murtadha © 2006 Faith Wambura Ngunjiri All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Judy A. Alston, Advisor There have been few studies on experiences of African women in leadership. In this study, I aimed at contributing to bridging that literature gap by adding the voices of African women leaders who live and work in or near Nairobi Kenya in East Africa. The purpose of this study was to explore, explain and seek to understand women’s leadership through the lived experiences of sixteen women leaders from Africa. The study was an exploration of how these women leaders navigated the intersecting oppressive forces emanating from gender, culture, religion, social norm stereotypes, race, marital status and age as they attempted to lead for social justice. The central biographical methodology utilized for this study was portraiture, with the express aim of celebrating and learning from the resiliency and strength of the women leaders in the face of adversities and challenges to their authority as leaders. Leadership is influence and a process of meaning making amongst people to engender commitment to common goals, expressed in a community of practice. I presented short herstories of eleven of the women leaders, and in depth portraits of the other five who best illustrated and expanded the a priori conceptual framework.
    [Show full text]
  • The Open Court. a "WTEEKLTT JOUKNAL
    — / The Open Court. A "WTEEKLTT JOUKNAL DEVOTED TO THE RELIGION OF SCIENCE. One Dollar per Year. No. 417, (Vol. IX.— 34.) CHICAGO, AUGUST 22, 1895. J I Single Copies, 5 Cents. Copyright by The Open Court Publishing Co.—Reprints are permitted only on condition of giving full credit to Author and Publisher. early years, discerned instinctively her IN MEMORIAM.—ROBERT LEWINS, M. D. surpassing ge- nius, watched her career, directed her studies, ar- Born 28th August, 1817. Died 22nd July, 1895. ranged for her foreign travel, —cherished this opening flower which promised so highly, until her blossoming A SOMEWHAT striking figure in London literarj' life became so much bound up with his own, that her circles has passed away in the person of the above. untimely death affected him as deeply as if she had Dr. Lewins was known to the readers of Tke Mo- been his only daughter. I shall never forget his let- nist and Tlie Open Court as an occasional contributor. ters at that sad time. If ever there was a purely in- In the thought-world generally, he was known as the tellectual passion without baser alloy, it was that which excogitator, and unwearied advocate, of the philosophic existed between these two. He wrote to me after her faith commonly called Hylo-Idealisrn ; as the accom- death : "This world for me, now, has its Gethsemane, " plished friend and mentor of the late Miss Constance and its Golgotlia ! And what does she say to him, Naden, and also as the writer in 1873 of a recently re- in that pathetic last letter of hers? "The thought published essay, entitled Life and Mind on the Basis of that my illness gives V('« pain, is almost more than I Modern Medicine.
    [Show full text]
  • Libertines and Radicals in Early Modern London: Sexuality, Politics, and Literary Culture, 1630-1685 James Grantham Turner Frontmatter More Information
    Cambridge University Press 0521782791 - Libertines and Radicals in Early Modern London: Sexuality, Politics, and Literary Culture, 1630-1685 James Grantham Turner Frontmatter More information LIBERTINES AND RADICALS IN EARLY MODERN LONDON A ‘Deluge of Libertinism’ swept through England in the turbulent seventeenth century: class and gender relations went into deep crisis, and sexually explicit literature took the blame. Bridging periods of- ten kept apart, Libertines and Radicals analyses English sexual culture between the Civil Wars and the death of Charles II in unprece- dented detail. James Grantham Turner examines a broad range of Civil War and Restoration texts, from sex-crime records to Milton’s epics and Rochester’s ‘mannerly obscene’ lyrics. Turner places spe- cial emphasis on women’s writing and on pornographic texts like The Wandring Whore and The Parliament of Women, flavoured with cock- ney humour or ‘Puritan’ indignation. Throughout, Turner reads satirical texts, whether political or pornographic, as an attempt to neutralize women’s efforts to establish their own institutions and their own voice. This exhaustive study will be of interest to cultural historians as well as literary scholars. JAMES GRANTHAM TURNER is Professor of English at the University of California at Berkeley. He is the author of The Politics of Landscape: Rural Scenery and Society in English Poetry, 1630–1660 (1979) and One Flesh: Paradisal Marriage and Sexual Relations in the Age of Milton (1987) and editor of Sexuality and Gender in Early Modern Europe:
    [Show full text]
  • Liberalism, Radicalism, and Legal Scholarship Steven H
    Cornell Law Library Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository Cornell Law Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 8-1983 Liberalism, Radicalism, and Legal Scholarship Steven H. Shiffrin Cornell Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/facpub Part of the Law and Philosophy Commons, and the Legal History, Theory and Process Commons Recommended Citation Shiffrin, Steven H., "Liberalism, Radicalism, and Legal Scholarship" (1983). Cornell Law Faculty Publications. Paper 1176. http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/facpub/1176 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell Law Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLE LIBERALISM, RADICALISM, AND LEGAL SCHOLARSHIP Steven Shiffrin*t INTRODUCTION In the eighteenth century, Kant answered the utilitarians.I In the nineteenth century, without embracing utilitarianism, 2 Hegel * Professor of Law, UCLA. This project started out as a broad piece entitled "Away From a General Theory of the First Amendment." It has taken on un- bounded proportions and might as well be called "Away From A General Theory of Everything." During the several years I have worked on it, more than thirty friends and colleagues have read one version or another and have given me helpful com- ments. Listing them all would look silly, but I am grateful to each of them, especially to those who responded in such detail. I would especially like to thank Dru Cornell, who served early in the project as a research assistant and thereafter offered counsel, particularly lending her expertise on continental philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • The French Left Long-Run Trends CLAUDE BOURDET
    Universities & Left Review Spring 1957 Vol.1 No 1 The French Left Long-run trends CLAUDE BOURDET From the social, internationalist period following the Liberation. 1947 following its opposition to the and anti-colonial ideals of the Re- Moreover, frightened as always by war in Indo China. Its disbandment sistance, seemingly all-powerful in the greater militancy and vigour increased the Party's tendency to August, 1944, to the repeated post- of the French Communists, the have an ageing membership. war relapses into right-wing reaction S.F.I.O. leaders moved ever closer Further, with many disillusioned or immobilisme—such has been the to the third party of the post-war radicals leaving the Party, the lead- dismal course of French politics. administrations, the M.R.P. This ership relied increasingly on people This has not been due to the polit- led to increasing involvement with who joined the Party for reasons of ical capacity of the French ruling the M.R.P.'s colonial interests and, personal ambition and status con- class—for seldom has a ruling class ultimately, to socialist support for siderations—for example the higher been so blind not only to the the Indo-Chinese War and refusal ranges of municipal employees, national interests but even to its of the repeated Viet Minh offers of teachers, civil servants. It was upon own, as that which squandered peace negotiation. Afraid of "going these people—to whom socialism French men and resources in Viet it alone" with the Communists, they meant little more than political sup- Nam.
    [Show full text]
  • Background, Brexit, and Relations with the United States
    The United Kingdom: Background, Brexit, and Relations with the United States Updated April 16, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL33105 SUMMARY RL33105 The United Kingdom: Background, Brexit, and April 16, 2021 Relations with the United States Derek E. Mix Many U.S. officials and Members of Congress view the United Kingdom (UK) as the United Specialist in European States’ closest and most reliable ally. This perception stems from a combination of factors, Affairs including a sense of shared history, values, and culture; a large and mutually beneficial economic relationship; and extensive cooperation on foreign policy and security issues. The UK’s January 2020 withdrawal from the European Union (EU), often referred to as Brexit, is likely to change its international role and outlook in ways that affect U.S.-UK relations. Conservative Party Leads UK Government The government of the UK is led by Prime Minister Boris Johnson of the Conservative Party. Brexit has dominated UK domestic politics since the 2016 referendum on whether to leave the EU. In an early election held in December 2019—called in order to break a political deadlock over how and when the UK would exit the EU—the Conservative Party secured a sizeable parliamentary majority, winning 365 seats in the 650-seat House of Commons. The election results paved the way for Parliament’s approval of a withdrawal agreement negotiated between Johnson’s government and the EU. UK Is Out of the EU, Concludes Trade and Cooperation Agreement On January 31, 2020, the UK’s 47-year EU membership came to an end.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Image and Political Influence of Princess Charlotte and Queen Adelaide
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 2003 Reform, Radicalism, and Royalty: Public Image and Political Influence of Princess Charlotte and Queen Adelaide Eileen Robin Hintz College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the European History Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons Recommended Citation Hintz, Eileen Robin, "Reform, Radicalism, and Royalty: Public Image and Political Influence of Princess Charlotte and Queen Adelaide" (2003). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539626412. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-ehge-1b89 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REFORM, RADICALISM, AND ROYALTY: Public Image and Political Influence of Princess Charlotte and Queen Adelaide A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Eileen Hintz 2003 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Eileen Hintz Approved by the Committee, December 2003 _ ___ James McCord Chandos Brown ff — Gilbert McArthur TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iv LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS v ABSTRACT vi INTRODUCTION 2 CHAPTER I. THE DEATH OF PRINCESS CHARLOTTE [NOVEMBER 1817] 6 CHAPTER II.
    [Show full text]
  • British Chartism and the “Luminous Political Example of America” by MICHAEL J
    1 British Chartism and the “luminous political example of America” By MICHAEL J. TURNER APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY Chartism was the most important popular reform mobilization in nineteenth-century Britain, and Chartists were generally well-disposed towards America. They admired its written constitution and guarantee of personal rights; its republican system and democratic suffrage; its religious toleration and the absence of an established church; its freedom from the weight of tradition, rank, class, and aristocracy; its well-developed local government and sense of active civic participation; its promise of liberty, opportunity, and progress. America seemed to represent what Britain could and should be. It offered Chartists a model and an inspiration. But Chartist attitudes towards America were not straightforward. They were nuanced, certainly self-serving, and in some respects dishonest. In order better to understand why, it is instructive to consider the statements of one of the foremost opinion-formers in Chartism, James Bronterre O’Brien, who made his name in the 1830s as a powerful writer for the unstamped press and was dubbed the Chartist movement’s “schoolmaster,” because he gave it an intellectual basis. Despite his fame, O’Brien remains an elusive figure. There exists only a small amount of scattered, unpublished personal material, which necessitates reliance on his publications, yet he completed few of his major writing projects, and important shorter pieces from the early part of his career were not revised or expanded later. There is only one modern biography of O’Brien, which appeared in 1971, but most of it was written in the 1920s and 1930s.
    [Show full text]
  • Radical Politics Between Protest and Parliament
    tripleC 15(2): 459-476, 2017 http://www.triple-c.at The Alternative to Occupy? Radical politics between protest and parliament Emil Husted* and Allan Dreyer Hansen** *Department of Organization, Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen, Denmark, www.cbs.dk/en/staff/ehioa **Department of Social Sciences and Business, Roskilde University, Roskilde, Den- mark, www.ruc.dk/~adh Abstract: In this paper, we compare the political anatomy of two distinct enactments of (left- ist) radical politics: Occupy Wall Street, a large social movement in the United States, and The Alternative, a recently elected political party in Denmark. Based on Ernesto Laclau’s conceptualization of ‘the universal’ and ‘the particular’, we show how the institutionalization of radical politics (as carried out by The Alternative) entails a move from universality towards particularity. This move, however, comes with the risk of cutting off supporters who no longer feel represented by the project. We refer to this problem as the problem of particularization. In conclusion, we use the analysis to propose a conceptual distinction between radical movements and radical parties: While the former is constituted by a potentially infinite chain of equivalent grievances, the latter is constituted by a prioritized set of differential demands. While both are important, we argue that they must remain distinct in order to preserve the universal spirit of contemporary radical politics. Keywords: Radical Politics, Radical Movements, Radical Parties, Discourse Theory, Ernesto Laclau, Universalism, Particularism, Occupy Wall Street, The Alternative Acknowledgement: First of all, we would like to thank the anonymous reviewers and the editorial team at tripleC for their constructive comments.
    [Show full text]