DOCSLIB.ORG

December 2011 G. John Ikenberry PERSONAL Born: October 5, 1954

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
December 2011 G. John Ikenberry PERSONAL Born: October 5, 1954 December 2011 G. John Ikenberry PERSONAL Born: October 5, 1954 Citizenship: U.S.A. Office Address: 116 Bendheim Hall Woodrow Wilson School Princeton University Princeton, N.J. 08544 609-258-4779 (tel) 609-258-0482 (fax) [email protected] EDUCATION Ph.D. Political Science, The University of Chicago, June 1985 M.A. Political Science, The University of Chicago, 1978 B.S. Political Science and Philosophy, Manchester College, 1976 HONORS, FELLOWSHIPS, AND GRANTS Eastman Professorship, 72nd, Balliol College, Oxford University, 2013-14 MacArthur Foundation, Funding Award, 2011-13 East-West Center POSCO Visiting Fellowship, 2011 American Academy of Berlin, Fellowship, 2011-12 (declined) Council for International Teaching and Research Grant, Princeton University, 2009-11 U.S.-Japan Foundation Grant, 2009-10 (with Takashi Inoguchi, University of Tokyo) Committee of Global Partnership, Project Grant, 2008-09 Member, School of Social Science, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, New Jersey, 2007-08 Princeton Institute for International and Regional Studies, Project Grant, 2006-09. German Marshall Fund-USA, Transatlantic Fellow, research project on politics of unipolarity, 2002-2004 German Marshall Fund-USA, grant, workshop on U.S.-European relations, 2003 German Marshall Fund-USA, grant, workshop on European-American I.R. Theory, 2001 U.S.-Japan Foundation Grant, 2000-2002 (with Takashi Inoguchi, University of Tokyo) Committee on Global Partnership Grant, 2000-2002 (with Takashi Inoguchi, University of Tokyo) Fellow, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, 1998-99 Hitachi/Council on Foreign Relations Fellowship, 1997-99 Research Award, International Center for the Study of East Asian Development, Kitakyushu, Japan, 1998- 99, 1999-2001 Research Award, University Research Institute, The University of Pennsylvania, 1994-95, 1996-97 International Affairs Fellow, Council on Foreign Relations, 1991-92, Department of State, Policy Planning Staff Visitor, School of Social Science, Institute for Advanced Studies, Princeton, New Jersey, 1987-88 Fellowship, Institute for the Study of World Politics, 1983-84 Research Fellowship, Foreign Policy Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, 1982-83 PREVIOUS APPOINTMENTS Senior Associate, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington, D.C., 1992-93 Assistant Professor of Politics and International Affairs, Princeton University, 1984-92 Joint Appointment in the Politics Department and the Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University Associate Professor of Political Science, The University of Pennsylvania Co-Director, Lauder Institute, The University of Pennsylvania, 1994-98 Non-resident Senior Fellow, The Brookings Institution Peter F..Krogh Professor of Geopolitics and Global Justice, Edmund Walsh School of Foreign Service and Department of Government, Georgetown University PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES Co-Editor, “Asia Today,” book series, Palgrave, 2012- Member, Commission on the Future of U.S-Brazil Relations, Council on Foreign Relations, Samuel W. Bodman and James D. Wolfensohn, Co-Chairs, 2010-11. Advisory Board, Center for International Affairs, Beijing University, China, 2007- Advisory Board, Center for European Policy Analysis, Washington, D.C., 2007- Editorial Board, American Interest, 2007 Editorial Board, Princeton University Press, 2006- 2010 Editorial Board, Global Asia, 2006- Editorial Committee, World Politics, 2004- Co-editor, International Relations of the Asia Pacific, 2004- Associate Editor- 1999-2004 Advisory Group, Department of State, April 2004 – January 2005 Member, Commission on the Future of U.S.-European Relations, Council on Foreign Relations, Henry Kissinger and Lawrence Summers, Co-Chairs, 2003-04. Editorial Board, East-West Center, East Asian book series, 2002-2007. Section Organizer, APSA annual conference, History and International Relations, 2002. Series Co-Editor, History and International Relations, Princeton University Press, 2001- Editorial Board, Current History, 1999- Reviewer, Political and Legal Affairs, Foreign Affairs, 1998- Editorial Board, Cambridge University Press, International Relations Series, 1997-2003 Board of Directors, International Institute for Mediation and Conflict Resolution, 1996-2000 Section Coordinator, "International Collaboration," American Political Science Association, 1996 annual meeting. Coordinator, Study Group on European Politics, Council on Foreign Relations, 1993-94. Senior Staff Member, Carnegie Commission on the Reorganization of Government for the Conduct of Foreign Policy, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1992 Senior Research Adviser, Commission on the Future of the IMF and the World Bank, 1992-94 Editor, World Politics, 1988-92; Associate Editor, 1985-88 Program Coordinator, Program on Interdependent Political Economy, The University of Chicago, 1983-84 Rapporteur, Social Science Research Council Conference, "Research Implications of Recent Theories of the State," Mt. Kisco, New York, February 1982 Editorial Assistant, Armed Forces and Society, Professor Morris Janowitz, Editor, January-December 1980, June 1981-April 1982 PUBLICATIONS BOOKS Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011). [translation, Chinese, Japanese forthcoming] [Choice – Outstanding Academic Title for 2011] Liberal Order and Imperial Ambition: Essays on American Power and International Order (London: Polity Press, 2006). [translated into Italian and Japanese.] After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars (Princeton:Princeton University Press, 2001). [Winner of the Robert L. Jervis and Paul W. Schroeder Prize for the best book on international history and politics published in 2000 and 2001.] [translated into Italian, Japanese, and Chinese.] State Power and World Markets: The International Political Economy, co-written with Joseph Grieco (New York: Norton, 2003). [Chinese translation in progress.] The State, with John A. Hall (Milton Keynes, Open University Press, 1989; Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989). [translated into French, Spanish, Portuguese, Romanian, Turkish, and Japanese.] Reasons of State: Oil Politics and the Capacities of American Government (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1988). EDITED BOOKS Unipolarity and International Relations Theory (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011), edited with Michael Mastanduno and William Wohlforth. The Alliance Constrained: The U.S.- Japan Security Alliance and Regional Multilateralism (New York: Palgrave, 2011), edited with Takashi Inoguchi and Yoichiro Sato. Crisis of American Foreign Policy: Wilsonianism in the New Century (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009). With Thomas Knock, Tony Smith, and Anne-Marie Slaughter. The United States and Northeast Asia: Debate, Issues, and New Order, edited by G. John Ikenberry and Chung-in Moon (Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2008). The End of the West? Crisis and Change in Atlantic Order (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2008). Author of the Introduction. The Uses of Institutions: U.S., Japan, and the Governance of East Asia, edited with Takashi Inoguchi (New York: Palgrave, 2006). Author of the introduction. The Nation State in Question, co-edited with T.V. Paul and John A. Hall (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003). International Relations Theory and the Asia-Pacific, co-edited with Michael Mastanduno (New York: Columbia University Press, 2003). Reinventing the Alliance: U.S.-Japan Security Partnership in an Era of Change, co-edited with Takashi Inoguchi (New York: Palgrave Press, 2003). American Unrivaled: The Future of the Balance of Power (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2002). [Translation in Italian and Chinese.] American Democracy Promotion: Impulses, Strategies and Impacts edited with Michael Cox and Takashi Inoguchi (London: Oxford University Press, 2000). [Japanese translation, 2006.] New Thinking in International Relations Theory, edited with Michael Doyle (Boulder: Westview Press, 1997). Co-editor with introduction and conclusion. American Foreign Policy: Theoretical Essays (Boston: Little, Brown, 1988; second edition, 1996; third edition, 1999, fourth edition, 2001). Editor with introductory essay. The State and American Foreign Economic Policy, edited by Ikenberry, David A. Lake, and Michael Mastanduno (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1988). ARTICLES IN REFERRED JOURNALS “Introduction: The End of the Cold War after 20 Years: Reconsiderations, Retrospectives and Revisions,” International Politics, Vol. 48, Numbers 4/5 (July/September 2011). Co-authored with Daniel Deudney. Special Issue: “IR and the End of the Cold War – Twenty Years After,” co-edited by Daniel Deudney and G. John Ikenberry. “Pushing and Pulling: The Western System, Nuclear Weapons, and Soviet Change,” International Politics, Vol. 48, Numbers 4/5 (July/September 2011). Co-authored with Daniel Deudney. Special Issue on: “IR and the End of the Cold War – Twenty Years After,” co-edited by Daniel Deudney and G. John Ikenberry. “Introduction,” International Relations of the Asia Pacific (September 2010), Vol. 10, No. 3. 10th Anniversary Special Issue on “A Post-American East Asia? Networks of Currency and Alliance in a Changing Regional Context,” with co-editor Takashi Inoguchi. “Liberalism in a Realist World: International Relations as an American Scholarly Tradition,” International Studies, Vol. 46, No. 1 & 2 (January & April 2009), special issue on “International Studies in India.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Lessons of 1914 for East Asia Today the Lessons of 1914 Ja Ian Chong and for East Asia Today Todd H
    The Lessons of 1914 for East Asia Today The Lessons of 1914 Ja Ian Chong and for East Asia Today Todd H. Hall Missing the Trees for the Forest A century has passed since the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo set in mo- tion a chain of events that would eventually convulse Europe in war. Possibly no conºict has been the focus of more scholarly attention. The questions of how and why European states came to abandon peaceful coexistence for four years of armed hostilities—ending tens of millions of lives and several im- perial dynasties—have captivated historians and international relations schol- ars alike. Today, Europe appears far removed from the precipice off which it fell a century ago. If anything, most European states currently seem more concerned about the damage potentially caused by ªnancial instruments than instruments of war. On a global scale, the destructive power of contemporary weaponry so dwarfs armaments of that earlier era that some scholars have argued great power war to be obsolete.1 Additionally, the international community has estab- lished international institutions, forums, and consultative mechanisms to chan- nel conºict away from the battleªeld and into the conference room. Yet, not only do the great power relations of that era persist in intriguing scholars; as Steven Miller and Sean Lynn-Jones observe, they also continue to “haunt,” for “they raise troubling doubts about our ability to conduct affairs of state safely in an international environment plagued by a continuing risk of war.”2 In many ways, these doubts have assumed a renewed salience Ja Ian Chong is Assistant Professor of Political Science at the National University of Singapore.
    [Show full text]
  • Astern Civilizations -- Regional Studies
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 043 537 SO 000 265 TITLE Social Studies, Grade 0, World Studies: !astern Civilizations -- Regional Studies. Course of Study and Related Learning Activities. Revised rdition. INSTITUTION NPw York City 9oard of Education, Prooklvn, N.Y. Pureau of Curriculum Development. SPONS AGENCY New York state Education Dept., Albany. Center for International Programs dnd Services. REPORT NO Curr-Mull-1060-i970-Ser-12 PUB DATE -10 NOTr nOFT.; History and Social Science Series AVAILABLE FP01 Poard of education of the City of New York, Publication Sales Office, 110 Livingston Street, Brooklyn, N. Y. 11201(S7. !O) Er)RS PRICE IMPS Price ME-$1.'0 PC trot Available from E! S. DESCRIPTORS African History, *Area Studios, Asian History, Concept Teaching, Cross Cultural Studies, Economics, Geography, *Grade 0, *Inductive Methods, Instructional Materials, Interdisciplinary Approach, Learning Activities, Multimedia Instruction, *Non Western Civilization, Political Science, Social Sciences, Social Studios Units, Sociology, *Fate Curriculum Guides, Values IDENTIFIERS Communist China, India, Japan, Middle East, USSR ABSTRACT ''he curriculum guide for non-western civilization area studies incorporates these major considerations: 1) the teachino of concepts rather than the accumulation of data, focusing on the development of critical thinking; 2)+he development of values, skills, and knowledge needed to cope with the Pressing social problems of today including: receptivity to change, international awareness, a committen+ to democratic values and
    [Show full text]
  • Toward a Resolution of the Cyprus Dispute and the Euro Crisis: a Geo-Economic Perspective
    CICERO FOUNDATION GREAT DEBATE PAPER No. 12/01 January 2012 TOWARD A RESOLUTION OF THE CYPRUS DISPUTE AND THE EURO CRISIS: A GEO-ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVE HALL GARDNER American University of Paris Professor and Chair of the Department of International and Comparative Politics The Question of Greek-Turkish Reconciliation over Cyprus The Greek debt debacle has opened a hemorrhage throughout the European Union. The bleeding has not yet been stopped. It appears dubious that merely restraining government expenditure and coordinating fiscal policy among other measures—even at an all-European level as advocated by Germany at the December 2011 EU summit—will be sufficient to rescue the Euro if new markets cannot soon be developed in order to foster strong economic growth.[1] But to develop new markets, bring in greater capital investment and foster strong economic growth will require new thinking towards Europe’s neighbors—most importantly, Turkey and Russia. Not generally depicted in the media is the fact that the Greek debt and larger Eurozone crisis (linked to the American-inspired mortgage and “toxic assets” crises as well as post-11 September 2001 US war debts[2]) have been accompanied by geo-economic tensions between Greek Cyprus and Turkey over the energy exploration of the American firm, Noble Energy, in offshore Mediterranean waters within the Greek Cypriot Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). This energy exploration has raised tensions between Turkey and Greece—with the EU, the United States, Russia and Israel backing Greek Cyprus. Lebanon, Egypt,
    [Show full text]
  • Asia: Miracle Maker Or Heart Breaker?
    ASIA: MIRACLE MAKER OR HEART BREAKER? 14TH Annual Asian Business Conference at the University of Michigan Business School - February 6 & 7, 2004 Page 1 of 73 ASIA: MIRACLE MAKER OR HEART BREAKER? Contents MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIRS...................................................................................................................................... 3 MESSAGE FROM THE FACULTY.................................................................................................................................. 4 2004 ORGANIZING COMMITTEE................................................................................................................................ 5 CONFERENCE KEYNOTES............................................................................................................................................... 7 LOGISTICS REPORT ............................................................................................................................................................. 9 ATTENDANCE DEMOGRAPHICS ...............................................................................................................11 DIRECTOR OF MARKETING REPORT ....................................................................................................................12 DIRECTOR OF PANELS REPORT ...............................................................................................................................13 ASEAN PANEL REPORT ...................................................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Escalation Control and the Nuclear Option in South Asia
    Escalation Control and the Nuclear Option in South Asia Michael Krepon, Rodney W. Jones, and Ziad Haider, editors Copyright © 2004 The Henry L. Stimson Center All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior permission in writing from the Henry L. Stimson Center. Cover design by Design Army. ISBN 0-9747255-8-7 The Henry L. Stimson Center 1111 19th Street NW Twelfth Floor Washington, DC 20036 phone 202.223.5956 fax 202.238.9604 www.stimson.org Table of Contents Preface ................................................................................................................. v Abbreviations..................................................................................................... vii Introduction......................................................................................................... ix 1. The Stability-Instability Paradox, Misperception, and Escalation Control in South Asia Michael Krepon ............................................................................................ 1 2. Nuclear Stability and Escalation Control in South Asia: Structural Factors Rodney W. Jones......................................................................................... 25 3. India’s Escalation-Resistant Nuclear Posture Rajesh M. Basrur ........................................................................................ 56 4. Nuclear Signaling, Missiles, and Escalation Control in South Asia Feroz Hassan Khan ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Uk Strategy in Asia: Some Starting Principles
    John Bew and David Martin Jones UK STRATEGY IN ASIA: SOME STARTING PRINCIPLES A Britain in the World Project policy bite | September 2017 About the Authors John Bew heads the Britain in the World Project at Policy Exchange and is Professor History and Foreign Policy at the War Studies Department at King’s College London. In 2015, Professor Bew was awarded the Philip Leverhulme Prize for Politics and International Studies and was previously the youngest ever holder of the Henry A. Kissinger Chair at the Library of Congress. His most recent books include Citizen Clem: A Life of Attlee, which won the 2017 Orwell Prize, and Realpolitik: A History which was named book of the year by The Times in 2016. David Martin Jones is a Visiting Fellow at Policy Exchange, Professor in the War Studies Department, King's College London and Honorary Reader in the School of Politics and International Studies at the University of Queensland. He has written several books on East and Southeast Asian politics and international relations – most recently Asian Security and the Rise of China (with Nick Khoo and M.LR. Smith). His articles on aspects of Asian politics have appeared in International Security, International Affairs, Comparative Politics, Orbis, Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, The Australian Journal of International Affairs, The World Today, The Australian, The Spectator, The Straits Times, The Australian Financial Review, The Daily Telegraph, Quadrant and Policy. About Britain in the World Policy Exchange’s Britain in the World project was launched in March 2016 by the Defence Secretary, Rt Hon Sir Michael Fallon, and by former Defence Secretary and NATO Secretary General, Rt Hon Lord Robertson of Port Ellen.
    [Show full text]
  • Islam in Asia: People, Practices, Traditions ABOUT the EXPLORING ASIA PROJECT and the “ISLAM in ASIA: PEOPLE, PRACTICES, TRADITIONS” SERIES
    NEWSPAPERS IN EDUCATION PRESENTS Islam In asIa: PeoPle, PractIces, tradItIons ABOUT THE EXPLORING ASIA PROJECT AND THE “ISLAM IN ASIA: PEOPLE, PRACTICES, TRADITIONS” SERIES Exploring Asia is a collaborative project between the Newspapers In Education program of The Seattle Times and the University of Washington’s Henry M. Jackson School of International Studies’ Asia and Global Studies outreach centers. The project consists of a five- article series, a teaching guide and a pre-series workshop for secondary teachers. Designed with young readers in mind, articles in this year’s Exploring Asia online newspaper series titled “Islam in Asia: People, Practices, Traditions” focus on social, political, educational, devotional and cultural practices in Islamic societies in Asia, where a majority of the world’s Muslims live. The five-part series includes articles on Indonesia, Pakistan, Kyrgyzstan and China, as well as an overview of Islam in Asia. This teaching guide provides a lesson plan for each article and activities to do with students before, during and after reading the featured weekly article. Together, the articles and accompanying lessons take students on an exploration of Islam in several Asian countries, asking students to look at the issues from multiple perspectives and to promote understanding. The points of view represented in the articles and the guide materials are a sampling of perspectives among many viewpoints on these issues. AUTHOR OF THE TEACHING GUIDE The author of the teaching guide for Exploring Asia’s “Islam in Asia: People, Practices, Traditions” series is Tese Wintz Neighbor. Tese Wintz Neighbor received a Master of Art degree in China Regional Studies from the Henry M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Iraq Crisis and Its Impact on the Future of EU-US Relations: an American View"
    "The Iraq Crisis and Its Impact on the Future of EU-US Relations: An American View" Hall Gardner (Copyright 2003) Let me make a few points before I venture into the present state of EU-US relations…. First, the idea of regime change in Iraq was on the official agenda since the October 1998 President Clinton signed into law the Iraq Liberation Act (Public Law 105-338), which had stated “It should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove the regime headed by Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq and to promote the emergence of a democratic government to replace that regime.” The question was thus never that of mere “disarmament,” but how to go about regime change—through support of insurgent forces, coup d’état or direct military intervention? The next question was how to promote the “emergence of a democratic government.” It is also fairly certain that President Bush Jr. was concerned with regime change from Day One of his presidency, according to outgoing democrats. Once again, the question was how to go about it. As the Bush administration was determined to engage in “regime change” regardless of its potential consequences, last minute Franco-German plans for more muscular UN inspections, following the massive build-up of US forces in the vicinity of Iraq, were doomed from the start. It should also be mentioned that the option of US military intervention to seize oil fields in the Middle East had been circulating in US neo-conservative circles at least since the Arab oil embargo in the 1970s.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of International Broadcasting on Africa 1 2 Olusesan S
    Developing Country Studies www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-607X (Paper) ISSN 2225-0565 (Online) Vol.4, No.4, 2014 The Impact of International Broadcasting On Africa 1 2 Olusesan S. Asekun-Olarinmoye Johnson M. Esiri Oladayo O. Ogungbamigbe 3 Ajibolu T. Balofin 1 1. Department of Mass Communication, Babcock School of Business, Babcock University, Ilisan-Remo, Ogun State, Nigeria; 2. Department of Mass Communication, Redeemer’s University, Kilometer 46, Lagos-Ibadan Expressway , Ogun State , Nigeria; 3. Department of Mass Communication, Federal Polythecnic, Offa, Kwara State, Nigeria; * E-mail of the corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract This study examined the impact of global broadcasting on Africa. The survey research method was applied to collect data with the structured questionnaire as the research instrument. 150 respondents who were purposively selected from Nigeria, South Africa and Egypt were administered the questionnaire online through the surveymonkey.com website. However, 110 respondents properly completed and submitted their questionnaires representing 73 percent response rate. Findings revealed that Cable News Network (CNN) is the preferred global TV news channel of 41 percent of the respondents followed by Al Jezeera (32 percent), China Central Television (18 per cent) and BBC World (9 percent). This is consistent with the 2012 European Media Survey (EMS) report which declared CNN as the undisputed No 1 news brand in Africa. Findings further revealed that global TV news channels carried mostly negative stories about Africa as indicated by 86 percent of the respondents. Furthermore, 60 percent of the respondents indicated that this pattern of coverage not only gave the continent a negative perception but worsened her economic woes.
    [Show full text]
  • Educational Attainment and Its Impact on Women's Status in Central Asia
    D3 SYSTEMS, INC. Educational Attainment and its Impact on Women’s Status in Central Asia A Comparative Analysis of Public Opinion of Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan Stephen Hornbeck Research Analyst March, 2012 8000 Towers Crescent Dr. Suite 1350 - Vienna, Virginia 22182 USA - Ph.703.388.2450 - Fx.703.388.2454 www.D3Systems.com Table of Contents Introduction ......................................................................................................................3 History of Education in Central Asia ...............................................................................4 Differences Among Neighbors ........................................................................................6 History’s Impact on Education ........................................................................................7 Employment Opportunities ..............................................................................................9 State of Economic Dependence: Payment of Wages .....................................................10 Conclusion .....................................................................................................................13 Methodology ..................................................................................................................15 Works Cited ...................................................................................................................22 8000 Towers Crescent Dr. Suite 1350 - Vienna, Virginia 22182 USA - Ph.703.388.2450 - Fx.703.388.2454 2
    [Show full text]
  • CA - FACTIVA - SP Content
    CA - FACTIVA - SP Content Company & Financial Congressional Transcripts (GROUP FILE Food and Drug Administration Espicom Company Reports (SELECTED ONLY) Veterinarian Newsletter MATERIAL) (GROUP FILE ONLY) Election Weekly (GROUP FILE ONLY) Health and Human Services Department Legal FDCH Transcripts of Political Events Military Review American Bar Association Publications (GROUP FILE ONLY) National Endowment for the Humanities ABA All Journals (GROUP FILE ONLY) General Accounting Office Reports "Humanities" Magazine ABA Antitrust Law Journal (GROUP FILE (GROUP FILE ONLY) National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and ONLY) Government Publications (GROUP FILE Alcoholism's Alcohol Research & ABA Banking Journal (GROUP FILE ONLY): Health ONLY) Agriculture Department's Economic National Institute on Drug Abuse NIDA ABA Business Lawyer (GROUP FILE Research Service Agricultural Outlook Notes ONLY) Air and Space Power Journal National Institutes of Health ABA Journal (GROUP FILE ONLY) Centers for Disease Control and Naval War College Review ABA Legal Economics from 1/82 & Law Prevention Public Health and the Environment Practice from 1/90 (GROUP FILE ONLY) CIA World Factbook SEC News Digest ABA Quarterly Tax Lawyer (GROUP FILE Customs and Border Protection Today State Department ONLY) Department of Energy Documents The Third Branch ABA The International Lawyer (GROUP Department of Energy's Alternative Fuel U.S. Department of Agricultural FILE ONLY) News Research ABA Tort and Insurance Law Journal Department of Homeland Security U.S. Department of Justice's
    [Show full text]
  • Redefining the Transatlantic Relationship for the Twenty-First Century – Why the Us and Europe Need Each Other1
    Hall GARDNER Professor Department of International and Comparative Politics American University of Paris Author: American Global Strategy and the ‘War on Terrorism (Ashgate, 2005) PARIS, 8 December 2005 REDEFINING THE TRANSATLANTIC RELATIONSHIP FOR THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY – WHY THE US AND EUROPE NEED EACH OTHER1 Lecture in the International Seminar for Experts “The European Security and Defence Policy and the Transatlantic Relationship – How to Strike a New Balance?”, organised by the Cicero Foundation in the series Great Debates, Paris, 8 – 9 December 2005 Introduction I would like to address the following issues that I believe to be of crucial importance for the future of transatlantic relations and for global peace: The US, NATO, Turkey and the EU Constitution; The New Wave of Multilateralism (with a focus on Iran); the Question of NATO, Europe and Russia; “The Quartet” and the Road Map to Peace. In the conclusion, I will propose the creation of what I call “regional security communities” backed by NATO, EU and Russian security accords, under the general mandate of the UN. My purpose is to explore ways to secure the peripheries of Europe, and consequently guarantee peace, stability and development of Europe and the world in the long term. I. The US, NATO, Turkey and the European Constitution It is interesting to note that the Bush administration had tried to keep a very quiet profile during the French constitutional debates, knowing that an official US position on the European Constitution might negatively influence the vote. The second term Bush administration has been divided between traditional “realists,” who support a more multilateral approach, in working with the Europeans and thus building Europe up, and the more ideologically inclined “neo-conservatives” who prefer a unilateral America-first approach, and who seek to keep Europe as weak and divided as possible.
    [Show full text]