Summary of Decisions Requested

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Summary of Decisions Requested Plan Change 38 – Changes to Appendix 11A: Schedule of Building, Objects and Places of Heritage Significance (North Shore Section of the Auckland Council District Plan) Summary of decisions requested Note: The texts in italics are for clarification purpose only. Proposed Plan Change 38 has been partially withdrawn. Please refer to the public notice for further details of the partial withdrawal. The publicly notified plan change included the following four distinct parts: a. Addition of 86 new items for protection b. Deletion of 99 currently scheduled items c. Changing the category of 44 currently scheduled items d. Making other changes to 74 currently scheduled items Among the four parts above only the proposed additions of new items (“a” above) are progressed, and the rest (“b”, “c” and “d” above) have been withdrawn. Those submissions that are “within scope” of the plan change after partial withdrawal are summarised in Table A. Further submissions can only be made on those summary of decisions requested listed in Table A. Those submissions received on the withdrawn parts are “outside scope” and are summarised in Table B. Further submissions cannot be made on the submissions listed in Table B. 1 Table A: Summary of decisions requested (“within scope” after partial withdrawal). Further submissions can be made on these submissions only. Submis Decision Requested Submitter name proposal in sion the notified part plan change 2.1 I do not want this property listed as historical B (or A). Remove from Historical G.M. Welsford Family Addition Building list. Trust 5.1 It is noted that the Stanley Bowling & Petanque Club at 20 Stanely Point Rd is William George Hughes Addition to be proposed Heritage Category (B). We the committee wish to register our interest in the above designation. Understood as – the Committee is concerned about the restrictions to make changes to the Bowling Club in the future due to the proposed scheduling. 7.1 Accept the plan change. (understood as support the proposed addition of Peter Joseph Matthews Addition 1019 Beach Road, Torbay) 7.2 The correct date of construction is 1926, as evidenced by the attached Peter Joseph Matthews Addition historical documents concerning purchase and construction. 8.1 Whilst this house is my original family home (and may have some Nocholas Patrick Addition architectural and historical significance) I wish to oppose the addition of this Duggan property to the Schedule of Buildings, Objects and Places of Heritage Significance. (Understood as oppose the proposed addition of 58 Forrest Hill Road, Forrest Hill) 14.1 Decline the plan change. I wish to have the provisions identified above Christopher James Addition deleted. (understood as oppose the proposed addition of 21 William Street, Reeve Takapuna) 19.1 Remove Winstone Holiday Cottage, 5 Ringwood Street, Torbay from the Peter and Jan Hay Addition proposed new items for addition to Appendix 11A, and ID 513 from DP map 8. 20.1 Decline the plan change. (understood as oppose the proposed addition of Donald Ross Melville Addition item 551 at 360 Lake Road, Takapuna) 21.1 That draft plan change be amended to include “Hammer and Sicle” residential Wyn Hoadley n/a1 housing / area on the Register (Belmont area, North Shore). 22.1 The “changing (rooms) shed” at 25 William Street, Takapuna be removed PF & JM Menzies Addition from the list of items for scheduling under PC 38. 23.1 Delete the house at 6 Awanui St from Appendix 11A The Schedule of Samuel Peter and Unchanged Buildings of Heritage Significance. Thelma Joan Money 24.1 Remove the St George’s Lounge / Hall complex from the heritage A St George’s Addition classification. Presbyterian Church, Takapuna The Church (St George’s) endorses the appropriateness of the recommended A classification for the church building itself, excluding the lounge/hall complex. 24.2 Remove the St George’s Presbyterian Manse from the heritage B St George’s Addition classification. Presbyterian Church, Takapuna The Church submits that the manse should not have any heritage classification. 27.1 The CBR & RA supports the recognition of this building’s significance. Castor Bay Ratepayers’ Addition (Understood as support the proposed addition of 139 Beach Road, Castor and Residents’ Bay) Association 28.1 The Corporation wishes that the Council re-consider the classification of the Housing New Zealand Addition property (at 139 Beach Road, Castor Bay) and that it either be removed or Corporation downgraded to a “Category B” rather than considered as a “Category A”. 29.01 The listing of Fort Takapuna is unclear about exactly what is covered. The Tamaki Reserve Unchanged general listing needs to be specific enough to protect not only the historic fort, Protection Trust which is also listed with the New Zealand Historic Places Trust, but also the related buildings. 29.02 The Historic Fort and coastal reserve should list and protect the following Tamaki Reserve Unchanged buildings: Protection Trust Fort Takapuna [1886] and subsequent alterations for defence purposes. 29.03 The Historic Fort and coastal reserve should list and protect the following Tamaki Reserve n/a buildings: Protection Trust Observation rooms and stores listed on defence plan DWG No 1333 12 011 - 334 29.04 The Historic Fort and coastal reserve should list and protect the following Tamaki Reserve n/a buildings: Protection Trust Observation rooms and stores listed on defence plan DWG No 1333 12 011 - 335 29.05 The Historic Fort and coastal reserve should list and protect the following Tamaki Reserve n/a buildings: Protection Trust Observation rooms and stores listed on defence plan DWG No 1333 12 011 - 336 29.06 The Historic Fort and coastal reserve should list and protect the following Tamaki Reserve n/a buildings: Protection Trust 1n/a = not applicable 2 Submis Decision Requested Submitter name proposal in sion the notified part plan change Observation rooms and stores listed on defence plan DWG No 1333 12 011 - 340 29.07 The Historic Fort and coastal reserve should list and protect the following Tamaki Reserve n/a buildings: Protection Trust Observation rooms and stores listed on defence plan DWG No 1333 12 011 - 341 29.08 The Historic Fort and coastal reserve should list and protect the following Tamaki Reserve n/a buildings: Protection Trust Observation rooms and stores listed on defence plan DWG No 1333 12 011 - 347 29.09 The Historic Fort and coastal reserve should list and protect the following Tamaki Reserve n/a buildings: Protection Trust Remains of gunnery platform and gun mounting adjacent to 953 29.10 The Historic Fort and coastal reserve should list and protect the following Tamaki Reserve n/a buildings: Protection Trust The ‘Left Batter’ 951 29.11 The Historic Fort and coastal reserve should list and protect the following Tamaki Reserve n/a buildings: Protection Trust The ‘Left Batter’ 952 29.12 The Historic Fort and coastal reserve should list and protect the following Tamaki Reserve n/a buildings: Protection Trust The ‘Left Batter’ 953 29.13 The Historic Fort and coastal reserve should list and protect the following Tamaki Reserve n/a buildings: Protection Trust The Engine Room, 339 29.14 The Historic Fort and coastal reserve should list and protect the following Tamaki Reserve n/a buildings: Protection Trust related tunnel leading to searchlight below 953 29.15 The Historic Fort and coastal reserve should list and protect the following Tamaki Reserve n/a buildings: Protection Trust The tunnel and steps leading to searchlight on cliff 29.16 Listing the Parade Ground on the Fort Takapuna Reserve: Tamaki Reserve n/a The Parade Ground, defined by the sites of former buildings 282, 283, 284, Protection Trust 285 and 287 29.17 Auckland Council should secure the listing of these buildings or structure in its Tamaki Reserve n/a list of Category A or B: Protection Trust Buildings 325, former Barrack buildings, protected by the New Zealand Historic Places Trust 29.18 Auckland Council should secure the listing of these buildings or structure in its Tamaki Reserve n/a list of Category A or B: Protection Trust 326, former Barrack buildings, protected by the New Zealand Historic Places Trust 29.19 Auckland Council should secure the listing of these buildings or structure in its Tamaki Reserve n/a list of Category A or B: Protection Trust 272, former Guard house, protected by the New Zealand Historic Places Trust 29.20 Auckland Council should secure the listing of these buildings or structure in its Tamaki Reserve n/a list of Category A or B: Protection Trust Building 280, a former officers’ mess, is more controversial, as part of it lies in the coastal reserve and part on the Council reserve. 29.21 Auckland Council should secure the listing of these buildings or structure in its Tamaki Reserve n/a list of Category A or B: Protection Trust Also within the coastal reserve or the Council reserve are two “pill boxes” 30.1 Deletion of entry No. 516 – Bus Depot Building, 2-22 Verran Road, in the Birkenhead Transport Addition Category B schedule for the Birkenhead Ward in Appendix 11A to the District Limited Plan as initiated by Proposed Plan Change 38, entirely. 32.1 Ashley Developments Limited seeks deletion of Atkinson’s Second Boatshed Ashley Developments Addition from Appendix 11A of Proposed Plan Change 38. Limited 35.1 That the Council confirm the retention of classifications on the properties and Bayswater Community n/a additions in Bayswater / Belmont to section 11 Cultural Heritage as outlined in Committee Inc. Plan Change 38. 36.1 Give full protection to the Masonic Tavern at 29 King Edward Parade, Gillian Margaret Werry Unchanged Devonport (# 278 on schedule). 37.1 Introduce Historic Heritage Precinct to protect Victoria Road.
Recommended publications
  • The Future of the Village Centre
    What is a business association? interested parties (such as Rotary, sports clubs and the local Any business that operates from premises within a BID's board) for the benefit of the community at large. "If you can The Future of the designated area is eligible for membership of that business get people working together, they feel like it's 'their place'." association, and a portion of its business rates are used to fund the association's function. Businesses outside a BID (for An exciting mix example: Northcross, Rothesay Bay or Oteha Valley) may There are 283 businesses within Browns Bay's BID, which Village Centre also apply to join the business association if they have a valid includes the town centre and the more industrial /commercial THE NATIONAL PERSPECTIVE asset to those retailers who have ownership of a distinct brand. commercial reason for doing so. There is usually a charge for area of Beach Road. Murray explains that this presents Research by NZ Post recently found that New Zealanders "If you offer something exclusive then the power of being this "associate membership". attractive opportunities for customers not offered by the likes spent $3.6 billion online in 2017, with the average online listed on Marketplace raises your potential customer reach of Takapuna. "You can drop off your car for a service and then shopper spending more than $2,350 annually. The report from tens of thousands locally to maybe 30 million across A business association is run by an executive committee (the either get a lift or enjoy a stroll into the town centre to shop also found that local retailers' online revenues increased by Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • East Coast Bays Lines MAGAZINE February/March 2020 It’S a Shore Thing!
    ShoreEast Coast Bays Lines MAGAZINE February/March 2020 It’s a Shore thing! In this issue... Browns Bay Wharf Is now the time for it to be rebuilt? St Valentine's Day Romantic (and not-so-romantic) movies The food of love Al fresco dining A deeper dive into Safeswim Torbay's International Cheese Judge The rewarding role of St John FEDs ... and much more • Browns Bay • Northcross • Pinehill • Rothesay Bay • Sherwood • Torbay • Albany • • Waiake • Mairangi Bay • Murrays Bay • Long Bay • Coatesville • Dairy Flat & Okura • Supported by: BUSINESS ASSOCIATION 1 ShoreLines Bay (in between the skate park and swings) with up-to-the- From the Editor.... minute info about water conditions? We met a Torbay resident who’s an international cheese Dear neighbour judge. Yes, it sounded like a dream job to me too! And, we couldn’t have a February issue with some mention of St I know we say it every year, but Valentine’s Day. Don't worry though, it's not all soppy… didn’t the festive season go by Our movie recommendations include a few anti-romantic really quickly?! It seems we have options for anyone who's sick of the lovey-dovey stuff! a huge build-up, then those two weeks when no-one knows what Speak again soon, day of the week it is, and suddenly we’re back at the office, on site, or at school. How ever you spent the holidays, I hope you created some 22 000 wonderful lasting memories. Some printed people clearly had a great time! Lizzie was photographed at Nice Café in Long Bay by Keri Little Photography Keri Bay by in Long Café at Nice photographed Lizzie was bi-monthly Our globe-trotting readers took ShoreLines with them, and shared their copies with the locals too (as you can see on our front cover!) In this issue, we’re looking at the history – and potential future – of Browns Bay wharf.
    [Show full text]
  • Valuation Rodney Ltd Email: [email protected] a Member of the Property INDEPTH Franchise Web
    Office: 09 427-6020 Mobile: 021 055-3485 Valuation Rodney Ltd Email: [email protected] A member of the Property INDEPTH Franchise Web: www.valuationrodney.co.nz Property News – January/February 2010 For those of you who enjoyed some leave over the Christmas period, we trust you are all suitably rested and ready for what looks like to be an interesting year ahead for the property sector. 2009 finished reasonably strong for the year, despite the usual December fall in activity, but certainly well up overall on the horror year of 2008. With indicators across all property sectors including average sales values and numbers, rental returns and building consents all recording positive changes, against a slowly recovering economy, may bode well for a reasonable 2010. Much will depend on the rate of recovery this year, and just how this transition stage will take shape in the forthcoming 12 months. Clearly our economy can never be the same. Historically our debt-funded consumer spending economy is unlikely to return to the same levels seen throughout the early 2000’s, and the statistics are frightening: House prices rose 62% between June 2003 and June 2008, the highest in the OECD; approximately 70% of house mortgage funding is now sourced off-shore - $32 billion in 1998 to $140 billion at the beginning of 2009; household debt is at $175 billion, up from $63 billion in 1999, it was just $5 billion in 1978 – New Zealand is now the second most indebted country in the Western World with household debt rising from 59% of disposable income in 1991 to 152% in September 2009; household savings rate remains deeply negative (we continue to spend more than we earn) with the Treasury and Reserve Bank forecasting the current account deficit to move back over 5% of GDP, and our net external liability position surging beyond 100% of GDP which is unsustainable in the current global economic climate.
    [Show full text]
  • Social and Geographical Differences in Road Traffic Injury in the Auckland Region
    Social and geographical differences in road traffic injury in the Auckland region Jamie Hosking, Shanthi Ameratunga, Daniel Exeter, Joanna Stewart Section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population Health, The University of Auckland Produced for Auckland Transport, 2013. ISBN: 978‐0‐473‐24259‐6 Acknowledgements This report was informed by a stakeholder reference group, the members of which are listed below. This report does not necessarily represent the views of the host organisations of reference group members. Laura Ager ACC Moses Alatini Safekids New Zealand Melanie Bartlett New Zealand Transport Agency Andrew Bell Auckland Transport Julie Chambers Auckland District Health Board Angie Cheong Auckland Transport Juanita deSenna Auckland Transport Greer Hawley Auckland Transport John Kelly New Zealand Police Peter Sandiford Waitemata District Health Board The assistance of the following people and organisations with this report was greatly appreciated: Bridget Kool, Carol Chelimo, Sandar Tin Tin and Alex Macmillan, University of Auckland, for advice on hospitalisation and mortality data and analysis, census data, and travel survey data David Drodskie, Auckland Transport, for providing CAS data Simon Gianotti, ACC, for advice on ACC road traffic injury data Joyce‐Anne Raihania, Injury Prevention Network of Aotearoa New Zealand (IPNANZ), for advice on road traffic injuries among Māori John Wallwork, New Zealand Transport Agency, for advice on use of Driver Licence Registry data Ministry of Transport, for provision of New Zealand Household Travel Survey data Koordinates.com and the Local Government Commission of the Department of Internal Affairs, for provision of data on Auckland local board areas This work includes Statistics New Zealand’s data which are licensed by Statistics New Zealand for re‐ use under the Creative Commons Attribution‐Noncommercial 3.0 New Zealand license.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study 2010: Sampling Procedure and Technical Details
    T h e N Z A V S - 10: Sampling Procedure | 1 This document can be cited as: Greaves, L. M., Krynen, A. M., Rapson, A. B., & Sibley, C. G. (2012). The New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study 2010: Sampling procedure and technical details. Unpublished technical report, The University of Auckland. The New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study 2010: Sampling Procedure and Technical Details Report prepared by Lara Greaves, Research Intern, and Ariana Krynen and Angela Rapson, 2011 Summer Scholarship recipients for the New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study (NZAVS), University of Auckland. All analyses conducted by Dr. Chris Sibley. Dr. Chris Sibley, Primary Investigator for the NZAVS, Department of Psychology, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand. E-mail: [email protected] http://www.psych.auckland.ac.nz/uoa/chris-sibley/ New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study Website: http://www.psych.auckland.ac.nz/uoa/nzavs Note for researchers: A copy of the technical report detailing the scales and questionnaire items used in the NZAVS-10 is available from Dr. Chris Sibley upon request. T h e N Z A V S - 10: Sampling Procedure | 2 Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 3 Sampling procedure ............................................................................................................................ 4 Demographics ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • North Shore Section
    14 Network Utilities and Designations 14-1 14.1 Introduction.................................................................................................... 14-1 14.2 Network Utilities and Designations: Issues.................................................... 14-2 14.3 Network Utilities and Designations: Objectives and Policies......................... 14-2 14.3.1 Objectives ................................................................................... 14-2 14.3.2 Policies ....................................................................................... 14-3 14.3.3 Methods ...................................................................................... 14-4 14.3.4 Environmental Results Anticipated ............................................. 14-5 14.4 Rules: Network Utility Activities ..................................................................... 14-5 14.4.1 Underlying zoning ....................................................................... 14-5 14.4.1.1 Activities within road reserve .................................. 14-5 14.4.1.2 Zoning on road stopping ........................................ 14-5 14.4.2 Activity Status ............................................................................. 14-5 14.5 Further Rules and Development and Activity Controls................................ 14-17 14.5.1 Radio-frequency and Electric and Magnetic Fields .................. 14-17 14.5.1.1 Radio-frequency fields ......................................... 14-17 14.5.1.2 Electric and Magnetic Fields ...............................
    [Show full text]
  • Average Deprivation Scores for Census Area Units
    Average Deprivation Scores for Census Area Units For administrative purposes, Statistics New Zealand The first table lists the CAUs, as well as the codes for divides the country into about 1900 Census Area Units the District Health Board (DHB) and Territorial Authority (CAUs) of unequal population size. Each is made up (TA) to which each belongs, and for each provides the of many meshblocks. At the time of the 2006 Census CAU deprivation decile and the population-weighted there were 1927 CAUs and 41,376 meshblocks. The average deprivation value. As with the NZDep2006 small NZDep2006 index of deprivation was created from area deciles, the value 1 indicates a CAU in the 10 per 23,786 NZDep2006 small areas that were, in general, cent least deprived CAUs in New Zealand, and the value either one meshblock, or two nearby meshblocks. 10 indicates that the CAU is in the 10 per cent most deprived CAUs. CAU averages and deciles are missing For many purposes it is useful to have an idea of the – indicated by a period – for CAUs where the usually deprivation characteristic of CAUs, which are often linked resident population was insufficient to calculate any to natural neighbourhoods, such as suburbs. Users component NZDep scores. should be aware though that there may be considerable variation in deprivation among the small areas that make An alphabetical index of the CAU names is provided after up the CAUs. This variation will be hidden when using an this table for cross-reference. average deprivation statistic for the CAU. Each CAU is part of one of the 21 DHBs.
    [Show full text]
  • East Coast Bays Lines MAGAZINE February/March 2019 It’S a Shore Thing! in This Issue
    ShoreEast Coast Bays Lines MAGAZINE February/March 2019 It’s a Shore thing! In this issue... Valentine’s Day reality check Dating in the 21st century Dining review: a romantic ristorante in Waiake How you can help Pest Free Hibiscus and Bays Better Blokes - men supporting men ...and much more Cover Photo: Stephanie Danieli • Browns Bay • Northcross • Pinehill • Rothesay Bay • Sherwood • • Torbay • Waiake • Mairangi Bay • Murrays Bay • Long Bay & Okura • Supported by: BUSINESS ASSOCIATION 1 ShoreLines memories of growing up in the Bays, we would love to hear from you. From the Editor.... Wishing you a safe and happy summer, And, just like that, Christmas was done and it was back to work in 2019. Did you make any new year’s resolutions? Maybe you embarked on Dry January or even PS. Remember to LIKE ShoreLinesNZ on Facebook for Vegan-uary? Whatever extra news and views. your goals for this year, I hope they bring you an 15 000 abundance of positive Printed rewards. bi-monthly In this issue, we’re taking a realistic look at Valentine’s Day, and sharing some commonsense advice about 21st century dating. If you’re looking for somewhere to take your partner out for dinner, and you enjoy unpretentious, homecooked food, turn to page 30 and read our dining review. Aside from matters of the heart, we also bring you news of a brilliant new initiative: Pest Free Hibiscus and Bays - and tell you how you can get involved (page 12). Clare Ellis Harcourts There’s information too about Better Blokes, a charitable organisation that helps male victims of abuse.
    [Show full text]
  • North Shore New Network Map
    North Shore New Network Map All current bus services are changing. Ferries and school buses are not part of this consultation The route numbers used are for consultation purposes only, and may not be the final numbers. Bus stop locations will be reviewed once the New Network is finalised. All routes travel in both directions except where arrows indicate. Get to know the new service types N78 will be extended when PROPOSED SERVICES Frequent services area develops BUSWAY SERVICES LOCAL SERVICES Operate on key routes across Auckland. Run at least N78 NX1 Albany to Britomart N12 Stanley Point to every 15 mins during the day (7am – 7pm, 7 days a week), (Lower Albert St), at least Devonport Ferry Terminal and may run less frequently outside of these times. every 10 – 15 mins, 7 days a week, more often during peak N13 Devonport Ferry Terminal to In some cases run more often at peak times. Long Bay Mt Victoria/Cheltenham NX2 Albany to City universities, N21a Northcote Point to Connector services NX to be extended s Rd at least every 10 – 15 mins, han Long Bay Long Bay 7 days a week, more often Smales Farm Station via to Hibiscus Coast Vaug B Regional Park during peak Northcote and Run at least every 30 mins during the day (7am – 7pm, e Ashley a North Shore Hospital Station in the future ch Albany to Newmarket, 7 days a week), and may run less frequently outside R NX3 d Ext Mon to Fri only, at least every N21b Birkenhead Wharf to of these times.
    [Show full text]
  • North Shore Cycle Map RAE R N E R AVE
    CA N COAST RE Y IR GATTA S T I N O D A S School E B R North Shore Cycle Map RAE R N E R AVE TRACK CRANSTON E SU U CO FOLEY C N B ROAD A LY TT ALEXANDER DEEP L E R AM I N D STREET D O G A N BlediWh L BETHEL O W E O R E E V RES I I R B I K HE E V V D E HEATHERLEIGH TOP W RESERVE A A NEILONDRIVE TI LISS KIRKDALE O L NG RI AIREY 1 2 WH 3 4 5 6 R 7 8 9 10 11 12 AMB 13 14 15 VIEW 16 17 18 19 20 21 SHARON T T CORRI TIRI 10 11 Central Auckland S S ROAD GARDEN Y AKA Y ACACIA E E U H C SE E E R R L I A L V EAGLESON R IL R AL DRIVE R R L TAHI ROBINSON U R E L T O HEBRON O O W IDYLL ANZAC RD H H MAWSON AVE F F A ALBANY SCENIC RESERVE N A G NOR’EAST COATESVILLE I E H L C RES L B B V RIC E A R N I N N I B O I HOLT VEN HEIGHTS R R NEWBURN OA D F A NE RD F ROAD O D D U N N R U G R NORTHCROSS E E L T R LAKE RIDGE Freemans Y I U A HALDER M ROAD E R ROAD D V CARLISLE E M R HM A SCENIC RES E E IDG OM I H RO Bay C J Z A A R C M A E P D R C L C T ROAD D U D R ROAD S H L E K Hobson Queens Wharf I E BRIGHAM STREET I A G G B H I W ROAD H FIRTH ROAD C O S V T A O D Wharf S B N R A C C A I O I E E H R ALBANY N 25 R N R A LIM A R L R D T R N L D CLIFTON TOOLEY STREET O K R D D E BRANSTON H A G Princes Wharf LY T A A E L R NE ROAD A SE R L K L I E I O O C A L O L R Legend A TRA R O E MER S Ferry P TUDOR L D D P R R C H A T E RO Great Barrier Island E F E A N New Zealand H A L A M N S C berth R T A Y O S D A L I National A I A lk Vehicular Ferry A L H T a D CHELTEN A ASCOT T R W W Marsden Wharf V R W T T I P BEACH s O E N LA N OBAN ROAD Maritime Captain Cook Wharf
    [Show full text]
  • The New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study 2009: Sampling Procedure and Technical Details
    T h e N Z A V S - 09: Sampling Procedure | 1 This document can be cited as: Reid, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2009). The New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study 2009: Sampling procedure and technical details. Unpublished technical report, The University of Auckland. The New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study 2009: Sampling Procedure and Technical Details Report prepared by Jessica Reid, Summer Scholarship recipient for the New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study (NZAVS), University of Auckland. All analyses conducted by Dr. Chris Sibley. Dr. Chris Sibley, Primary Investigator for the NZAVS, Department of Psychology, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand. E-mail: [email protected] http://www.psych.auckland.ac.nz/uoa/chris-sibley/ New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study Website: http://www.psych.auckland.ac.nz/uoa/nzavs Note for researchers: A copy of the technical report detailing the scales and questionnaire items used in the NZAVS-09 is available from Dr. Chris Sibley upon request. 1 T h e N Z A V S - 09: Sampling Procedure | 2 Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 3 Sampling procedure ................................................................................................................................ 4 Demographics ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Gender ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • New North Shore Bus Network
    J003427 North Shore New Network Brochure.indd 6-7 New North Shore Bus Network D Long Bay ai Regional Park ry Fla t H ig d d Long Bay Ferry to hw ohi R R ay wan s Gulf Harbour NX A an St h io ug iok Long Bay Va K Continue to B B o e u d Hibiscus Coast e n d P a ty R g c in l Ashley h r P D Rd ea y NEW NETWORK SERVICES u lb re Reserve Ext B e y d A h R S d R s r Long Bay h Long Bay BUSWAY SERVICES LOCAL SERVICES e l e v i Primary y Coll. R A C W li a v Hibiscus Coast Station, Albany Station, Britomart Frequency and hours of operation vary. r s Eagle Pl a alph e R NX1 u R i a d k I B u A d (Lower Albert St) via all Northern Busway stations O a Check timetables for full details R e n r S l a a t b S v n c a a e g l d h n G i R e a St y w Rd Ave nu R oa NX2 806 a r Albany Station, City universities via Wellesley St Stanley Point, Devonport Ferry Terminal - ar M d To S O nv e t t St r l r S Co d i e G e u R w East Dr i n ty Re w C dwick u o w in a A aru Albany Station, all Northern Busway stations, a ku Rd a 807 s T M r Cheltenham, Devonport Ferry Terminal NX t liam D S il R itzw e 866 o dwic r Ponsonby Rd, Karangahape Rd, Auckland City F re k D a d St Ma t r l i y o n a Hospital and Newmarket.
    [Show full text]