DOCSLIB.ORG

North Shore Section

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
North Shore Section 14 Network Utilities and Designations 14-1 14.1 Introduction.................................................................................................... 14-1 14.2 Network Utilities and Designations: Issues.................................................... 14-2 14.3 Network Utilities and Designations: Objectives and Policies......................... 14-2 14.3.1 Objectives ................................................................................... 14-2 14.3.2 Policies ....................................................................................... 14-3 14.3.3 Methods ...................................................................................... 14-4 14.3.4 Environmental Results Anticipated ............................................. 14-5 14.4 Rules: Network Utility Activities ..................................................................... 14-5 14.4.1 Underlying zoning ....................................................................... 14-5 14.4.1.1 Activities within road reserve .................................. 14-5 14.4.1.2 Zoning on road stopping ........................................ 14-5 14.4.2 Activity Status ............................................................................. 14-5 14.5 Further Rules and Development and Activity Controls................................ 14-17 14.5.1 Radio-frequency and Electric and Magnetic Fields .................. 14-17 14.5.1.1 Radio-frequency fields ......................................... 14-17 14.5.1.2 Electric and Magnetic Fields ................................ 14-17 14.5.2 Development Controls .............................................................. 14-18 14.5.2.1 Reinstatement ...................................................... 14-19 14.5.2.2 Landscaping ......................................................... 14-19 14.5.2.3 Maintenance ......................................................... 14-19 14.5.2.4 Height, Height to Boundary and Yard Controls .... 14-20 14.5.3 Additional Controls for Specific Activities .................................. 14-20 14.5.3.1 Aerials .................................................................. 14-20 14.5.3.2 Antennas attached to Buildings ............................ 14-21 14.5.3.3 Height of masts and antennas attached to masts 14-22 14.5.3.4 Activities of Licensed Amateur Radio Operators .. 14-22 14.5.3.5 Location of minor utility structures ........................ 14-23 14.5.3.6 Underground service/connection lines ................. 14-23 14.5.3.7 Bus shelters ........................................................ 14-24 14.5.4 Activity Controls ........................................................................ 14-25 14.6 Controlled Activities - Reservations and Assessment Criteria..................... 14-25 14.6.1 Reservations and Assessment Criteria for General Controlled Activities .................................................................................... 14-25 14.6.1.1 Reservations for General Controlled Activities ..... 14-25 14.6.1.2 General Assessment Criteria ............................... 14-26 14.6.2 Reservations and Assessment Criteria for Specific Controlled Activities .................................................................................... 14-27 14.6.2.1 Replacement of Electricity Transmission Towers 14-27 14.6.2.2 Gas Regulator Stations ........................................ 14-28 14.6.2.3 Minor utility structures, public letterboxes and telecommunication kiosks within the road reserve ................................................................. 14-28 14.6.2.4 Water Supply Reservoirs, Wastewater Storage Tanks and Pumping Stations .......................................... 14-28 14.6.2.5 Pipe Bridges ......................................................... 14-29 14.6.2.6 Antenna and Masts .............................................. 14-29 14.7 Limited Discretionary Activities - Restrictions and Assessment Criteria...... 14-29 14.7.1 Restrictions and Assessment Criteria for Specific Limited Discretionary Activities .............................................................. 14-29 14.7.1.1 Restrictions and Assessment criteria for minor utility structures ............................................................. 14-29 14.7.1.2 Restrictions and Assessment criteria for public letterbox- es and telecommunication kiosks ........................ 14-29 14.7.1.3 Restrictions and Assessment criteria for above ground service/connection lines and above ground electricity and telecommunication lines ................................ 14-30 14.7.1.4 Restrictions and Assessment criteria for Replacement of Electricity Transmission Towers ...................... 14-30 14.7.1.5 Restrictions and Assessment criteria for Pipe Bridges ................................................................ 14-30 14.7.1.6 Restrictions and Assessment criteria for Aerials, Antennas, and Masts and replacement utility structures ............................................................. 14-30 14.8 Underlying Zoning of Roads........................................................................ 14-31 14.9 Designations ............................................................................................... 14-31 14.9.1 Information to be Provided with a Requirement ....................... 14-31 14.9.2 Conditions ................................................................................. 14-32 14.9.3 Work to be Undertaken on Designated Land ........................... 14-32 14.9.4 Activities Not in Accordance with Designation .......................... 14-32 14.9.5 Schedule of Designations ......................................................... 14-32 14.10 Development Controls Relating to Specific Designations ........................... 14-33 14.10.1 RNZAF Airbase Flight paths ..................................................... 14-33 14.10.1.1 Height Restriction Controls .................................. 14-33 14.10.1.2 Proposals Which Exceed Height Restrictions ...... 14-34 14.11 Conditions Attached to the Designation of Auckland Prison ....................... 14-34 14.12 Refuse Disposal .......................................................................................... 14-34 14.13 Exclusion from the Resource Management Act .......................................... 14-35 Appendices 14A: Schedule of Designations ........................................................................................ 14-36 14B: Approach and Take-Off Climb Surfaces and Transitional Surfaces ........................ 14-53 14C: Horizontal and Conical Surfaces.............................................................................. 14-54 14D: Proposed Service Lanes.......................................................................................... 14-55 14E: Proposed Service Lane............................................................................................ 14-56 14F: Proposed Service Lanes.......................................................................................... 14-57 14G: Proposed Service Lane............................................................................................ 14-58 14H: Development Plan For the Designation of Refuse Disposal Purposes at Rosedale Road ........................................................................................................ 14-59 14I: Possible End Use Proposal for the Refuse Disposal Site at Rosedale Road .......... 14-62 14J: Schedule of Heritage Orders ................................................................................... 14-66 14K: "Part A" Electricity Transmission Steel Tower Replacement as a Controlled Activity 14-67 14L: Exclusion from the Resource Management Act....................................................... 14-68 14M: Conditions Attached to the Designation of Auckland Prison (Designation 120) ...... 14-69 14:N "Defence Purposes" Designation Definition............................................................. 14-73 14:O: Clarification of Designation 184 (Pinehill Telecommunication Facility).................... 14-74 Section 14: Network Utilities and Designations 14. Network Utilities and Designations 14.1 Introduction The successful functioning of the city and its many services depends on a complex network of utilities and designations including water and wastewater reticulation; electricity transmission, distribution networks; telecommunication networks (including privately owned aerials and antennas); gas networks; the wastewater treatment plant; landfills; defence; public hospitals; and schools. Some of these network utilities are implemented by way of resource consent, and others by way of designation. Network Utilities 1. Network utilities are provided for un- procedures of the Act. Section 14 will der the Act by way of Permitted activ- also be used by Council to help as- ity or by resource consent. The part sess any outline plans submitted for of this Section 14 comprising objec- new network utilities or activities on tives, policies, rules and assessment designated sites, or where an area is criteria apply where network utility designated but works are conducted operators do not intend, or are una- which are not in accordance with the ble, to operate under the designation designation. In managing the effects of network utilities, recognition should be given to the essential role that these networks play and the services they provide in the functioning of the city. It is also recognised however that the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Take a Moment in Mairangi Bay COURTESY of ROTARY Brownsbayrotary.Co.Nz
    March 2021 Issue 127 Mairangi retail Bay revive • relax • NOW 10,000 COPIES TO LOCALS! font: Anada black font: Anada black Proudly supported by the Mairangi Bay Business Association and Hibiscus and Bays Local Board MAIRANGI BAY font:font: Anada Anada black black font: Anada black font: Anadafont: black Anada black Sundays Live music from New Dates Tim Prier and March 7, 14, 21, 28 Chris from Albie and 4:00pm – 6:00pm the Wolves. Kids entertainment, face painting, and sausage sizzle! Mairangi Bay BYO picnic or grab a takeaway from the many Beach and eateries in Mairangi Bay Surf Club www.mairangibayvillage.co.nz Mairangi Bay Proud to support Village relax • revive • retail ssociation www.mairangibayvillage.co.nz The official magazine of the Mairangi Bay Business A Message from the Business Association To submit a news item please contact: Community News: commencing Sunday, 7th March, from Terry Holt • Phone: 021 042 8232 4:00pm to 6:00pm, and then on Sunday Email: [email protected] 14, 21 and 28 March. Further details can Village News Magazine be found on the Mairangi Bay Face book Editorial & Advertising enquiries: Terry Holt • Phone: 021 042 8232 page, website and later in this issue. Email: [email protected] There will be live music, kids Paul Hailes • Phone: 021 217 3628 entertainment ,face painting and a Email: [email protected] sausage sizzle. Bring a picnic or grab Gary Covich • Design and Production a takeaway from the many eateries in Jane Warwick • Contributing writer Here we are already into our second Mairangi Bay and have some fun at Additional photos by Unsplash.com issue for the year and just when we the beach.
    [Show full text]
  • North Harbour Asian Community Data
    North Harbour Asian Community Data Prepared by Harbour Sport’s ActivAsian Team May 2021 CONTENTS Contents ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 Population Facts ........................................................................................................................................... 3 2018 Census North Harbour region – Population by Ethnic Group .......................................................... 5 2018 Census North Harbour region – Asian Ethnic Group % by area ....................................................... 6 PHYSICAL ACTIVITY LEVEL – ASIAN POPULATION (NATIONAL) ................................................................... 7 PHYSICAL ACTIVITY LEVEL – ASIAN POPULATION (AUCKLAND - CHINESE) ............................................... 8 Asian Diversity of North Harbour Schools By Ethnic Group – ERO Report statistics .............................. 10 ASIAN DIVERSITY OF NORTH HARBOUR SCHOOLS BY ETHNIC GROUP ................................................... 13 HIBISCUS AND BAYS LOCAL BOARD AREA ............................................................................................ 13 UPPER HARBOUR LOCAL BOARD AREA ................................................................................................. 14 RODNEY LOCAL BOARD AREA ................................................................................................................ 15 KAIPATIKI LOCAL BOARD AREA
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of the Village Centre
    What is a business association? interested parties (such as Rotary, sports clubs and the local Any business that operates from premises within a BID's board) for the benefit of the community at large. "If you can The Future of the designated area is eligible for membership of that business get people working together, they feel like it's 'their place'." association, and a portion of its business rates are used to fund the association's function. Businesses outside a BID (for An exciting mix example: Northcross, Rothesay Bay or Oteha Valley) may There are 283 businesses within Browns Bay's BID, which Village Centre also apply to join the business association if they have a valid includes the town centre and the more industrial /commercial THE NATIONAL PERSPECTIVE asset to those retailers who have ownership of a distinct brand. commercial reason for doing so. There is usually a charge for area of Beach Road. Murray explains that this presents Research by NZ Post recently found that New Zealanders "If you offer something exclusive then the power of being this "associate membership". attractive opportunities for customers not offered by the likes spent $3.6 billion online in 2017, with the average online listed on Marketplace raises your potential customer reach of Takapuna. "You can drop off your car for a service and then shopper spending more than $2,350 annually. The report from tens of thousands locally to maybe 30 million across A business association is run by an executive committee (the either get a lift or enjoy a stroll into the town centre to shop also found that local retailers' online revenues increased by Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • If Only Classes at School Had Been As Much Fun
    www.northshoretimes.co.nz Tuesday, November 2, 2010 Safer streets: New Zealand is a far cry from Russia when it comes to crime, as North Shore community patroller Dmitry Pantileev knows. Photo: BEN WATSON Russian crimefighter By MICHELLE ROBINSON offences. He noticed the man Here, citizens help the police, quietened down lately which people show different acting suspiciously, took is likely due to harder econ- gestures towards us.’’ RUSSIAN migrant Dmitry down his car registration and they’re not scared for their lives. omic times, Neighbourhood Mr Pantileev was one of Pantileev is helping keep the contacted police who caught ‘ Support North Shore chair- five patrollers to receive a Dmitry Pantileev streets safe. the offender. ’ man John Stewart says. Certificate of Commendation He is among a number of Mr Pantileev has also been But the organisation can from police at Neighbourhood people who give their time – first on the scene to a major their lives. We don’t have this his wife at a language school. always do with more patrol- Support’s annual general sometimes until 4am – to act car accident where he was sort of thing in Russia.’’ He is studying towards his lers, he says. meeting. as the eyes and ears of the able to call for help. Drug abuse, organised masters in forensic infor- Mr Pantileev says patrol- North Shore police. ‘‘As a citizen I’m interested crime and police corruption mation technology at AUT. lers’ presence is enough to ❚ Contact the Neighbourhood The Neighbourhood Sup- in our streets being safer.’’ are rife, he says. He volunteers as a patrol- deter criminals and their role Support Office at the North port North Shore community Safety is vital for Mr He moved to New Zealand ler two evenings a month is well known in the com- Shore Policing Centre on patroller helped officers Pantileev after life in Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • Rothesay Bay Is a Small Suburb Close to Mairangi Bay, Murrays Bay and Browns Bay on Auckland’S North Shore
    Rothesay Bay is a small suburb close to Mairangi Bay, Murrays Bay and Browns Bay on Auckland’s North Shore. The family friendly beach overlooking Rangitoto Island is popular among locals for its safe beach and large grass park with a children’s playgound. A well loved clifftop walkway runs between Browns Bay, along Rothesay Bay all the way to Takapuna and is a regular path for exercisers and those taking the dog for a stroll. A short walk from the beach, Rothesay Bay Village has undergone some recent changes with the new apartment and shops development that has just been completed. New shops are popping up and making themselves at home among established local favourites like The British Isles Pub, Armadillos and Chand Indian Restaurant. Rothesay Bay is a well supported little village with just about everything you need on your doorstep - hairdressers, beauticians, a bakery, dairy and wine shop are all here. Rothesay Bay is zoned for nearby decile 10 schools, some within walking distance of the Village. Murrays Bay Primary School, Browns Bay Primary School and St John’s Catholic Primary School are excellent schools that lead into the highly regarded Murrays Bay Intermediate and Rangitoto College. Commuting beachside to City side is an easy option via excellent transport links to the City or nearby Albany Mega Centre. Browse my listings to view current and sold properties in Rothesay Bay and its surrounding area. .
    [Show full text]
  • East Coast Bays Lines MAGAZINE February/March 2020 It’S a Shore Thing!
    ShoreEast Coast Bays Lines MAGAZINE February/March 2020 It’s a Shore thing! In this issue... Browns Bay Wharf Is now the time for it to be rebuilt? St Valentine's Day Romantic (and not-so-romantic) movies The food of love Al fresco dining A deeper dive into Safeswim Torbay's International Cheese Judge The rewarding role of St John FEDs ... and much more • Browns Bay • Northcross • Pinehill • Rothesay Bay • Sherwood • Torbay • Albany • • Waiake • Mairangi Bay • Murrays Bay • Long Bay • Coatesville • Dairy Flat & Okura • Supported by: BUSINESS ASSOCIATION 1 ShoreLines Bay (in between the skate park and swings) with up-to-the- From the Editor.... minute info about water conditions? We met a Torbay resident who’s an international cheese Dear neighbour judge. Yes, it sounded like a dream job to me too! And, we couldn’t have a February issue with some mention of St I know we say it every year, but Valentine’s Day. Don't worry though, it's not all soppy… didn’t the festive season go by Our movie recommendations include a few anti-romantic really quickly?! It seems we have options for anyone who's sick of the lovey-dovey stuff! a huge build-up, then those two weeks when no-one knows what Speak again soon, day of the week it is, and suddenly we’re back at the office, on site, or at school. How ever you spent the holidays, I hope you created some 22 000 wonderful lasting memories. Some printed people clearly had a great time! Lizzie was photographed at Nice Café in Long Bay by Keri Little Photography Keri Bay by in Long Café at Nice photographed Lizzie was bi-monthly Our globe-trotting readers took ShoreLines with them, and shared their copies with the locals too (as you can see on our front cover!) In this issue, we’re looking at the history – and potential future – of Browns Bay wharf.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genetic Analysis of Lasaea Hinemoa: the Story of an Evolutionary Oddity
    The Genetic Analysis of Lasaea hinemoa: The Story of an Evolutionary Oddity KATHERINE LOCKTON A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Science at the University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand 1 March 2019 ABSTRACT Lasaea is a genus of molluscs that primarily consists of minute, hermaphroditic bivalves that occupy rocky shores worldwide. The majority of Lasaea species are asexual, polyploid, direct developers. However, two Australian species are exceptions: Lasaea australis is sexual, diploid and has planktotrophic development, whereas Lasaea colmani is sexual, diploid and direct developing. The New Zealand species Lasaea hinemoa has not been phylogeographically studied. I investigated the phylogeography of L. hinemoa using mitochondrial and nuclear gene sequencing (COIII and ITS2, respectively). Additionally, I investigated population- level structuring around Dunedin using microsatellite markers that I developed. It was elucidated that the individuals that underwent genetic investigation consisted of four clades (Clade I, Clade II, Clade III and Clade IV). Clade I and Clade III dominated in New Zealand and support was garnered through gene sequencing and microsatellite analysis for these clades to represent separate cryptic species, with biogeographic splitting present. Clade II consisted of individuals that had been collected from the Antipodes Island. The Antipodes Island contained individuals from two clades (Clade I and Clade II), with Lasaea from the Kerguelen Islands being more closely related to individuals from Clade II than Clade I was to Clade II. This genetic distinction between Clade I and Clade II seemed to indicate transoceanic dispersal via the Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC) between the Kerguelen Islands and Antipodes Island. Clade IV clustered very distinctly from L.
    [Show full text]
  • Valuation Rodney Ltd Email: [email protected] a Member of the Property INDEPTH Franchise Web
    Office: 09 427-6020 Mobile: 021 055-3485 Valuation Rodney Ltd Email: [email protected] A member of the Property INDEPTH Franchise Web: www.valuationrodney.co.nz Property News – January/February 2010 For those of you who enjoyed some leave over the Christmas period, we trust you are all suitably rested and ready for what looks like to be an interesting year ahead for the property sector. 2009 finished reasonably strong for the year, despite the usual December fall in activity, but certainly well up overall on the horror year of 2008. With indicators across all property sectors including average sales values and numbers, rental returns and building consents all recording positive changes, against a slowly recovering economy, may bode well for a reasonable 2010. Much will depend on the rate of recovery this year, and just how this transition stage will take shape in the forthcoming 12 months. Clearly our economy can never be the same. Historically our debt-funded consumer spending economy is unlikely to return to the same levels seen throughout the early 2000’s, and the statistics are frightening: House prices rose 62% between June 2003 and June 2008, the highest in the OECD; approximately 70% of house mortgage funding is now sourced off-shore - $32 billion in 1998 to $140 billion at the beginning of 2009; household debt is at $175 billion, up from $63 billion in 1999, it was just $5 billion in 1978 – New Zealand is now the second most indebted country in the Western World with household debt rising from 59% of disposable income in 1991 to 152% in September 2009; household savings rate remains deeply negative (we continue to spend more than we earn) with the Treasury and Reserve Bank forecasting the current account deficit to move back over 5% of GDP, and our net external liability position surging beyond 100% of GDP which is unsustainable in the current global economic climate.
    [Show full text]
  • Used a Hedonic Property Price Function to Estimate the Effect of Flood
    AARES 52nd Annual Conference 2008 Flood prone risk and amenity values: a spatial hedonic analysis Oshadhi Samarasinghe and Basil Sharp 1 Flood prone risk and amenity values: a spatial hedonic analysis Oshadhi Samarasinghe, Basil Sharp* Department of Economics, The University of Auckland, New Zealand * Corresponding author: 64-9-373 7599 E-mail address: [email protected] 2 Abstract This study examines the impact of flood hazard zone location on residential property values. The study utilises data from over 2,000 private residential property sales occurred during 2006 in North Shore City, New Zealand. A spatial autoregressive hedonic model is developed to provide efficient estimates of the marginal effect of flood prone risks on property values. Our results suggest that a property located within a flood hazard zone sells for 4.3% less than an equivalent property located outside the flood hazard zone. Given the median house price, estimated discount associated with flood risks is approximately NZ$22,000. Keywords: Flood hazard; Spatial hedonic; Amenity value JEL classification: Q15; Q51 3 1. Introduction The least frequently occurring natural hazards include earthquakes, volcanism, tsunami, meteorological events such as storms, and fire. While of low return frequency, natural hazards are potentially of major regional significance. In the case of flooding it is possible that many properties are in a flood hazard zone but the owners’ have never experienced a flood. Even though a flood hazard zone might be based on a 1% chance of occurring every year a storm causing the area to be flooded may not have occurred in the last several decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Social and Geographical Differences in Road Traffic Injury in the Auckland Region
    Social and geographical differences in road traffic injury in the Auckland region Jamie Hosking, Shanthi Ameratunga, Daniel Exeter, Joanna Stewart Section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population Health, The University of Auckland Produced for Auckland Transport, 2013. ISBN: 978‐0‐473‐24259‐6 Acknowledgements This report was informed by a stakeholder reference group, the members of which are listed below. This report does not necessarily represent the views of the host organisations of reference group members. Laura Ager ACC Moses Alatini Safekids New Zealand Melanie Bartlett New Zealand Transport Agency Andrew Bell Auckland Transport Julie Chambers Auckland District Health Board Angie Cheong Auckland Transport Juanita deSenna Auckland Transport Greer Hawley Auckland Transport John Kelly New Zealand Police Peter Sandiford Waitemata District Health Board The assistance of the following people and organisations with this report was greatly appreciated: Bridget Kool, Carol Chelimo, Sandar Tin Tin and Alex Macmillan, University of Auckland, for advice on hospitalisation and mortality data and analysis, census data, and travel survey data David Drodskie, Auckland Transport, for providing CAS data Simon Gianotti, ACC, for advice on ACC road traffic injury data Joyce‐Anne Raihania, Injury Prevention Network of Aotearoa New Zealand (IPNANZ), for advice on road traffic injuries among Māori John Wallwork, New Zealand Transport Agency, for advice on use of Driver Licence Registry data Ministry of Transport, for provision of New Zealand Household Travel Survey data Koordinates.com and the Local Government Commission of the Department of Internal Affairs, for provision of data on Auckland local board areas This work includes Statistics New Zealand’s data which are licensed by Statistics New Zealand for re‐ use under the Creative Commons Attribution‐Noncommercial 3.0 New Zealand license.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study 2010: Sampling Procedure and Technical Details
    T h e N Z A V S - 10: Sampling Procedure | 1 This document can be cited as: Greaves, L. M., Krynen, A. M., Rapson, A. B., & Sibley, C. G. (2012). The New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study 2010: Sampling procedure and technical details. Unpublished technical report, The University of Auckland. The New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study 2010: Sampling Procedure and Technical Details Report prepared by Lara Greaves, Research Intern, and Ariana Krynen and Angela Rapson, 2011 Summer Scholarship recipients for the New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study (NZAVS), University of Auckland. All analyses conducted by Dr. Chris Sibley. Dr. Chris Sibley, Primary Investigator for the NZAVS, Department of Psychology, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand. E-mail: [email protected] http://www.psych.auckland.ac.nz/uoa/chris-sibley/ New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study Website: http://www.psych.auckland.ac.nz/uoa/nzavs Note for researchers: A copy of the technical report detailing the scales and questionnaire items used in the NZAVS-10 is available from Dr. Chris Sibley upon request. T h e N Z A V S - 10: Sampling Procedure | 2 Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 3 Sampling procedure ............................................................................................................................ 4 Demographics ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Average Deprivation Scores for Census Area Units
    Average Deprivation Scores for Census Area Units For administrative purposes, Statistics New Zealand The first table lists the CAUs, as well as the codes for divides the country into about 1900 Census Area Units the District Health Board (DHB) and Territorial Authority (CAUs) of unequal population size. Each is made up (TA) to which each belongs, and for each provides the of many meshblocks. At the time of the 2006 Census CAU deprivation decile and the population-weighted there were 1927 CAUs and 41,376 meshblocks. The average deprivation value. As with the NZDep2006 small NZDep2006 index of deprivation was created from area deciles, the value 1 indicates a CAU in the 10 per 23,786 NZDep2006 small areas that were, in general, cent least deprived CAUs in New Zealand, and the value either one meshblock, or two nearby meshblocks. 10 indicates that the CAU is in the 10 per cent most deprived CAUs. CAU averages and deciles are missing For many purposes it is useful to have an idea of the – indicated by a period – for CAUs where the usually deprivation characteristic of CAUs, which are often linked resident population was insufficient to calculate any to natural neighbourhoods, such as suburbs. Users component NZDep scores. should be aware though that there may be considerable variation in deprivation among the small areas that make An alphabetical index of the CAU names is provided after up the CAUs. This variation will be hidden when using an this table for cross-reference. average deprivation statistic for the CAU. Each CAU is part of one of the 21 DHBs.
    [Show full text]