Print This Article

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Print This Article 124 The importance of the Kanchalan River, Chukotka, Russia, for the Lesser White-fronted Goose Anser erythropus THOMAS HEINICKE1, NIKOLAY N. YAKUSHEV2 & EVGENY E. SYROECHKOVSKI, JR.3 1Chausseestr. 1, D-18581 Vilmnitz, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] 2Saratov university, Astrakhanskaya str. 83, 410012 Saratov, Russia. 3Institute of Ecology and Evolution, RAS, Goose, Swan and Duck Study Group of Northern Eurasia, Leninskiy prospect 33, 119071 Moscow, Russia. Abstract An expedition was made to two different parts of the Anadyr region, southern Chukotka in summer 2006, to make an inventory of the bird fauna of the region. The Lesser White-fronted Goose Anser erythropus was found for the first time in both areas. Significant numbers (~ 1% of the eastern flyway population of the species) were counted in the middle reaches of the Kanchalan River in mid-June, with smaller numbers seen on moult migration in the coastal region of Russkaya Koshka during early July. Total numbers in the Kanchalan floodplain were estimated at 150–200 birds, of which 40–50 were paired adults and the rest non-breeders. These numbers indicate that the area is of international importance for the species. Although breeding was not recorded, the birds’ location and habitat structure make the breeding of the species in the area likely. Key words: Anadyr region, Chukotka, Kanchalan River, Lesser White-fronted Goose, Russkaya Koshka. The Lesser White-fronted Goose Anser 2006). The breeding range of the eastern erythropus is a globally threatened species, population is thought to extend from the classed as vulnerable by the International Taymyr Peninsula eastwards into the Union for the Conservation of Nature Chukotka region, but seems to be very (IUCN 2008). The most recent mid-winter fragmented (Jones et al. 2008; Morozov & estimates suggest that 8,000–13,000 Syroechkovskiy 2002). In recent years, individuals occur in the western population breeding birds were located in several parts and 20,000 in the eastern population (Jones of Yakutia, with the highest numbers in the et al. 2008; Delany et al. 2008; Delany & Scott Abyi lowlands. Small numbers are known to ©Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust Wildfowl (2009) 59: 124–134 Lesser White-fronted Geese in Chukotka, Russia 125 breed in the Anabar River basin and in the visited from 9–18 June; Camp II, in the lower valleys of the Olenka River and the lower part of the river basin (23 km Yana River (Artyukhov & Syroechkovski northeast of Kanchalan village; 65°15’N, 1999; Morozov & Syroechkovskiy 2002). 177°11’E), was visited for a shorter period, The knowledge of the easternmost part from 22–26 June; and Camp III, also in the of the breeding range in the Chukotka lower part of the river basin (5 km south of region is very patchy and there are few Kanchalan village; 65°07’N, 176°46’E), was observations of the geese at their nest visited from 29 June–2 July (Fig. 1). The sites (Birdlife International 2001; Morozov Kanchalan River floodplain consisted of a & Syroechkovskiy 2002; Krechmar & mosaic of creeks, gravel/sand banks and Kondratyev 2006). islands with many pools and lakes, An expedition was undertaken to make a particularly around Camp I. The vegetation general inventory of the bird fauna in two was mostly patches of shrubs and trees different parts of the Anadyr region of (including Salix sp., Alnus fruticosa, Betula Chukotka, east Russia, in summer 2006, in exilis and Populus suaveolens) up to 3 m high, an area not previously known to hold Lesser and open mires covered by sedges (Carex White-fronted Geese. This paper presents sp.) and mosses. The western border of the the counts and other observations made of floodplain was a 30–40 m high cliff. The Lesser White-fronted Geese during the floodplain was surrounded by Eriophorum survey, and considers the importance of the tussock tundra with several lakes and open area for the species. The results are mires with sedge-moss vegetation. discussed in relation to other recently The second study area, the coastal published data of Lesser White-fronted lagoon of Russkaya Koshka ~ 60 km east- Geese reported in other parts of Chukotka. southeast of Anadyr, was visited from 7–29 July, both to make a survey of the Methods highly endangered Spoon-billed Sandpiper The survey in 2006 focussed on two areas to Eurynorhynchus pygmeus and to count the north and east of the city of Anadyr breeding, migrating and moulting waterbirds (Fig. 1). The first of these, the Kanchalan at the site. study area (~ 65°10’N, 176°46’E), was a Both study areas were explored on foot, river basin ~ 60 km northwest of Anadyr. using a combination of transect counts and This part of the expedition covered nearly counts made at particular sites (for instance the same area as an earlier expedition to the lakes, islands and lagoons) to record the region in 1975 (described by Kistchinski et number of birds in the vicinity. Line al. 1983). Observations were made in the transects were also taken when moving by Kanchalan study area from 7 May–2 July boat from Kanchalan village to the different 2006, from three camps along the river camps along the river. In the Kanchalan area basin. Camp I, in the middle reaches of the about 4,000 ha were covered around Camp I, river basin (50 km north-northeast of both to the east and west of the river, with an Kanchalan village; 65°33’N, 177°14’E), was additional 500 ha monitored at one of the ©Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust Wildfowl (2009) 59: 124–134 126 Lesser White-fronted Geese in Chukotka, Russia Figure 1. Location of the different study areas: I-III = Kanchalan area, Chukotka (I = Camp I, II = Camp II, III = Camp III), IV = Russkaya Koshka, Chukotka, Russia. islands in the floodplain. Line transects along was explored up to 4 km to the west and 8.5 the cliff west of the Kanchalan River km to the east of Camp I. About 3,000 ha covered 7 km to the north and 13 km to the east of the river at Camp II, and ~ 4,000 ha south of Camp I. The surrounding tundra east and southeast of the river near Camp ©Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust Wildfowl (2009) 59: 124–134 Lesser White-fronted Geese in Chukotka, Russia 127 III, were also explored. The total length of on three of 23 days in the Russkaya Koshka the line transect along the Kanchalan River area. between Camp I and Kanchalan village was Within the Kanchalan area, Lesser ~ 100 km, divided into three main sections: White-fronted Geese were found mainly 33, 45 and 20 km stretches of the river from near Camp I, particularly on the islands and north to south. Daily excursions usually gravel banks of the river floodplain. They covered different parts of the study area and also used the neighbouring tundra, but only places close to the campsites were almost entirely < 1–2 km from the flood counted regularly. Excursions normally plain. Counts of 71 individuals south of the started around noon and ended in the late camp and a further 23 individuals north of evening. Satellite images of the study area the camp were recorded along a 20 km were used for orientation and observations, transect along the top of the cliff on 12–13 including goose counts, were assigned to June. These 94 birds (4.7 individuals/km of different landmarks such as islands and lakes. river basin) consisted of 38 pairs, four single At the Russkaya Koshka coastal lagoon, birds and small flocks of up to six birds. 6,500 ha including 1,100 ha around Camp Only six individuals (6.4%) were identified IV were covered. The 1,100 ha were divided as being second-year birds, indicating a low into three study plots where birds were percentage of returning juveniles or low counted regularly, every third day. productivity the previous summer. Another Hunting pressure on different goose 33 km transect on 18 June, when birds were species in the Kanchalan area was assessed counted from a boat travelling along the from the remains of plucked birds collected Kanchalan River, recorded 124 individuals in Kanchalan village and from the camp most of which were in pairs or very small sites of reindeer herders. Remains of sixteen flocks, but included one flock of 24 birds. different birds (usually wings only) were This covered part but not all of the area found around individual houses and at a surveyed on 12–13 June; the area south of communal rubbish heap at Kanchalan the camp was covered on both occasions, village. Another three wing remains and a but almost all areas north of the camp were freshly shot bird were detected at a reindeer missed on 18 June. On combining the herders’ camp site near Camp I. All of the different counts, the numbers of Lesser geese found in Kanchalan area were White-fronted Geese in the middle reaches collected during spring (late April and May) of Kanchalan River were estimated to be 2006, whereas the fresh remains near Camp 150–200 birds and the minimum number of I were found in June. Species was adult pairs to be 40–50 (Table 1). Assuming determined from the length of the wing and that the 7,000 ha of the floodplain with from the colour of the plumage. vegetation cover provided suitable habitat, this indicates a density of 0.57–0.71 adult Results pairs/km2. Lesser White-fronted Geese were observed The Lesser White-fronted Goose was the on 15 of 19 days in the Kanchalan area and most commonly observed goose species in ©Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust Wildfowl (2009) 59: 124–134 128 Russia LesserWhite-fronted GeeseinChukotka, ©Wildfowl Trust &Wetlands Table 1.
Recommended publications
  • Helicobacter Pylori's Historical Journey Through Siberia and the Americas
    Helicobacter pylori’s historical journey through Siberia and the Americas Yoshan Moodleya,1,2, Andrea Brunellib,1, Silvia Ghirottoc,1, Andrey Klyubind, Ayas S. Maadye, William Tynef, Zilia Y. Muñoz-Ramirezg, Zhemin Zhouf, Andrea Manicah, Bodo Linzi, and Mark Achtmanf aDepartment of Zoology, University of Venda, Thohoyandou 0950, Republic of South Africa; bDepartment of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy; cDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy; dDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Research Institute for Physical-Chemical Medicine, 119435 Moscow, Russia; eDepartment of Diagnostic and Operative Endoscopy, Pirogov National Medical and Surgical Center, 105203 Moscow, Russia; fWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom; gLaboratorio de Bioinformática y Biotecnología Genómica, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Unidad Profesional Lázaro Cárdenas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, 11340 Mexico City, Mexico; hDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, United Kingdom; and iDepartment of Biology, Division of Microbiology, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91058 Erlangen, Germany Edited by Daniel Falush, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom, and accepted by Editorial Board Member W. F. Doolittle April 30, 2021 (received for review July 22, 2020) The gastric bacterium Helicobacter pylori shares a coevolutionary speakers). However, H. pylori’s presence, diversity, and structure history with humans that predates the out-of-Africa diaspora, and in northern Eurasia are still unknown. This vast region, hereafter the geographical specificities of H. pylori populations reflect mul- Siberia, extends from the Ural Mountains in the west to the tiple well-known human migrations. We extensively sampled H.
    [Show full text]
  • Sources and Pathways 4.1
    Chapter 4 Persistant toxic substances (PTS) sources and pathways 4.1. Introduction Chapter 4 4.1. Introduction 4.2. Assessment of distant sources: In general, the human environment is a combination Longrange atmospheric transport of the physical, chemical, biological, social and cultur- Due to the nature of atmospheric circulation, emission al factors that affect human health. It should be recog- sources located within the Northern Hemisphere, par- nized that exposure of humans to PTS can, to certain ticularly those in Europe and Asia, play a dominant extent, be dependant on each of these factors. The pre- role in the contamination of the Arctic. Given the spa- cise role differs depending on the contaminant con- tial distribution of PTS emission sources, and their cerned, however, with respect to human intake, the potential for ‘global’ transport, evaluation of long- chain consisting of ‘source – pathway – biological avail- range atmospheric transport of PTS to the Arctic ability’ applies to all contaminants. Leaving aside the region necessarily involves modeling on the hemi- biological aspect of the problem, this chapter focuses spheric/global scale using a multi-compartment on PTS sources, and their physical transport pathways. approach. To meet these requirements, appropriate modeling tools have been developed. Contaminant sources can be provisionally separated into three categories: Extensive efforts were made in the collection and • Distant sources: Located far from receptor sites in preparation of input data for modeling. This included the Arctic. Contaminants can reach receptor areas the required meteorological and geophysical informa- via air currents, riverine flow, and ocean currents. tion, and data on the physical and chemical properties During their transport, contaminants are affected by of both the selected substances and of their emissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Spanning the Bering Strait
    National Park service shared beringian heritage Program U.s. Department of the interior Spanning the Bering Strait 20 years of collaborative research s U b s i s t e N c e h UN t e r i N c h UK o t K a , r U s s i a i N t r o DU c t i o N cean Arctic O N O R T H E L A Chu a e S T kchi Se n R A LASKA a SIBERIA er U C h v u B R i k R S otk S a e i a P v I A en r e m in i n USA r y s M l u l g o a a S K S ew la c ard Peninsu r k t e e r Riv n a n z uko i i Y e t R i v e r ering Sea la B u s n i CANADA n e P la u a ns k ni t Pe a ka N h las c A lf of Alaska m u a G K W E 0 250 500 Pacific Ocean miles S USA The Shared Beringian Heritage Program has been fortunate enough to have had a sustained source of funds to support 3 community based projects and research since its creation in 1991. Presidents George H.W. Bush and Mikhail Gorbachev expanded their cooperation in the field of environmental protection and the study of global change to create the Shared Beringian Heritage Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic Marine Aviation Transportation
    SARA FRENCh, WAlTER AND DuNCAN GORDON FOundation Response CapacityandSustainableDevelopment Arctic Transportation Infrastructure: Transportation Arctic 3-6 December 2012 | Reykjavik, Iceland 3-6 December2012|Reykjavik, Prepared for the Sustainable Development Working Group Prepared fortheSustainableDevelopment Working By InstituteoftheNorth,Anchorage, Alaska,USA PROCEEDINGS: 20 Decem B er 2012 ICElANDIC coast GuARD INSTITuTE OF ThE NORTh INSTITuTE OF ThE NORTh SARA FRENCh, WAlTER AND DuNCAN GORDON FOundation Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................ 5 Acknowledgments ......................................................................... 6 Abbreviations and Acronyms .......................................................... 7 Executive Summary ....................................................................... 8 Chapters—Workshop Proceedings................................................. 10 1. Current infrastructure and response 2. Current and future activity 3. Infrastructure and investment 4. Infrastructure and sustainable development 5. Conclusions: What’s next? Appendices ................................................................................ 21 A. Arctic vignettes—innovative best practices B. Case studies—showcasing Arctic infrastructure C. Workshop materials 1) Workshop agenda 2) Workshop participants 3) Project-related terminology 4) List of data points and definitions 5) List of Arctic marine and aviation infrastructure AlASkA DepartmENT OF ENvIRONmental
    [Show full text]
  • A Case of Chukotka
    ISSN 1883-1656 Центр Российских Исследований RRC Working Paper Series No. 71 Demographic Situation and Its Perspectives in the Russian Far East: A Case of Chukotka Kazuhiro KUMO August 2017 RUSSIAN RESEARCH CENTER INSTITUTE OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH HITOTSUBASHI UNIVERSITY Kunitachi, Tokyo, JAPAN DEMOGRAPHIC SITUATION AND ITS PERSPECTIVES IN THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST: A CASE OF CHUKОТКА Kazuhiro KUMO 1. INTRODUCTION The purposes of the present study are, first of all, a general review of the population migration patterns in the Far East region of Russia following the demise of the Soviet Union; and secondly, a study of the situation that emerged in the developing regions as a result of the state policy of the Soviet period, using the example of the demographic trends in the Chukotka Autonomous Okrug as one of the most distal Russian territories with respect to the center of Russia. To date, several studies have been conducted on inter-regional migration in Russia; by the the author (Kumo, 1997, 2003) a comparative analysis of migration in the post-Soviet Russia was conducted and major changes taking place in the migration patterns were considered in the specified periods. Yu. Andrienko and S. Guriev (Andrienko and Guriev, 2002) performed a comparative analysis of inter-regional migration based on the gravity model and showed that the adoption of the migration decision by the population depended on the regional-economic variables. The results of the above-mentioned studies demonstrate that traditional means of analyzing migration patterns can be applied to Russia, which went through the change in the state system, and the authors conclude that migration flows are largely dependent on economic reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Transition in the North, Vol. 1, No. 4, May 1993
    \ / ' . I, , Social Transition.in thb North ' \ / 1 \i 1 I '\ \ I /? ,- - \ I 1 . Volume 1, Number 4 \ I 1 1 I Ethnographic l$ummary: The Chuko tka Region J I / 1 , , ~lexdderI. Pika, Lydia P. Terentyeva and Dmitry D. ~dgo~avlensly Ethnographic Summary: The Chukotka Region Alexander I. Pika, Lydia P. Terentyeva and Dmitry D. Bogoyavlensky May, 1993 National Economic Forecasting Institute Russian Academy of Sciences Demography & Human Ecology Center Ethnic Demography Laboratory This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DPP-9213l37. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recammendations expressed in this material are those of the author@) and do not ncccssarily reflect the vim of the National Science Foundation. THE CHUKOTKA REGION Table of Contents Page: I . Geography. History and Ethnography of Southeastern Chukotka ............... 1 I.A. Natural and Geographic Conditions ............................. 1 I.A.1.Climate ............................................ 1 I.A.2. Vegetation .........................................3 I.A.3.Fauna ............................................. 3 I1. Ethnohistorical Overview of the Region ................................ 4 IIA Chukchi-Russian Relations in the 17th Century .................... 9 1I.B. The Whaling Period and Increased American Influence in Chukotka ... 13 II.C. Soviets and Socialism in Chukotka ............................ 21 I11 . Traditional Culture and Social Organization of the Chukchis and Eskimos ..... 29 1II.A. Dwelling ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Corporate Responsibility Report
    Corporate Responsibility Report 2015 KINROSS 2015 CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY REPORT Message Performance Materiality Our Putting People Generating Engaging Empowering Managing From Highlights Approach First – Health Economic Our Communities Our CEO and Safety Value Workforce Environmental Footprint 03 05 09 13 30 38 45 60 102 Welcome to Kinross’ 2015 Corporate Responsibility Report. This report chronicles our progress over the past two years in delivering on our commitment to responsible mining. Our goal is to provide a balanced and transparent account of our corporate responsibility strategy and performance, and our evolving relationships with the communities where we work, our employees and contractors, host governments, and non-profit and non-governmental organizations. This report includes our 2015 CR Data Tables and our GRI Index. All dollar amounts shown in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted. Dvoinoye Kupol Fort Knox Corporate Profile Kettle River-Buckhorn Kinross is a Canadian-based senior gold mining company, Bald Mountain Toronto headquartered in Toronto, Canada, with ten operating mines located Round Mountain in Brazil, Chile, Ghana, Mauritania, Russia and the United States, Tasiast employing approximately 9,100 people worldwide. Our focus is Chirano on delivering value based on the core principles of operational excellence, balance sheet strength, disciplined growth and responsible mining. Kinross maintains listings on the Toronto Stock Exchange Paracatu (symbol:K) and the New York Stock Exchange (symbol:KGC). Maricunga GRI CONTENT
    [Show full text]
  • Chukotka's Natural Heritage at a Glance
    Rough-legged Hawk. for a living planet The Bering Sea Ecoregion CHUKOTKA’S Photo: Peter Grigorovich Chukotka, officially the Chukotsky NATURAL HERITAGE Autonomous Okrug, forms Russia’s north-eastern fron- AT A GLANCE tier. About half of the region’s 737,700 square kilometers lies above the Arctic Circle. The region’s landscape is domi- nated by alpine and arctic tundra, although small larch, pine, birch, poplar, and willow trees can grow in the valleys of larger rivers. More than 900 species of plants grow in Chukotka, The Bering Strait coast. including 400 Photo: Dennis Litovka species of moss and lichen. Polar bears, Thirty fresh- Wrangel Island. water fish species inhabit Chukotka’s inland lakes and streams. Photo: Gennady Smirnov There are 220 bird species in the region. The chilly waters washing the region’s shores provide important habitat for numerous marine mammals, while species such as brown bear, sable, lynx, ermine, mountain hare, and mink can be found in terrestrial habitats. Numerous rare and endangered species inhabit the Chukotsky Autonomous Okrug. Among those listed in the Red Data Book of the Russian Federation are the polar bear, bighorn sheep, narwhal, hump- back whale, finback whale, grey whale, blue whale, razor back, Photo: Arne Nævra, www.naturbilder.no and 24 bird species. Walruses, Wrangel Island. Native hunting party. Siberian dwarf pine. Tumanskaya River. Photo: Gennady Smirnov Photo: Gennady Smirnov Photo: Gennady Smirnov Photo: Gennady Smirnov CHUKOTKA’S PROTECTED AREAS Legend WWF high priority conservation areas Monuments of nature 0 50 100 150 km Subadult white-tailed sea eagle. Lebediny Federal Zoological Wildlife Refuge he Lebediny Federal Zoological Wildlife Refuge, between the Main and Anadyr TRivers, protects almost 400,000 hectares of wetland habitats, as well as the animal species inhabiting them.
    [Show full text]
  • Bering Sea Sub-Network II Sharing Knowledge – Improving Understanding – Enabling Response
    Project Summary: Bering Sea Sub-Network II Sharing Knowledge – Improving Understanding – Enabling Response International Community-Based Environmental Observation Alliance for a Changing Arctic A Predecessor to CONAS, the Community Observation Network for Adaptation and Security Lilian Alessa | Grace Beaujean | Leah Bower | Iver Campbell | Olga Chernenko | Patricia Cochran | Margie Coopchiak | Maryann Fidel | Uliana Fleener | Jim Gamble | Arlene Gundersen | Verna Immingan | Lisa Jackson | Alice Kalmakoff | Andrew Kliskey | Sharon Merculief | Delbert Pungowiyi | Olia (Olga) Sutton | Eddie Ungott | Joni Ungott | Jessica Veldstra BSSN II Summary 1 Foreward The Bering Sea Sub-Network (BSSN) phase II is an international community-based monitoring network that represents the work of many within the framework of a successful partnership of Arctic indigenous communities, university scientists (the University of Alaska Anchorage), the Alaska Native Science Commission and an NGO – the Aleut International Association (AIA). This report was compiled by AIA, a Permanent Participant of the Arctic Council. The information provided in this report is from interviews conducted by community members with community members; those who have an intimate connection to the land and the sea. We hope that this effort will provide novel information about the effects of climate change on rural indigenous communities in the Bering Sea that may be used to inform adaptive actions and highlight the importance of partnerships in tackling today’s challenges. This publication should be cited as: Lilian Alessa1, Grace Beaujean2, Leah Bower2, Iver Campbell3, Olga Chernenko4, Patricia Cochran5, Margie Coopchiak6, Maryann Fidel2, Uliana Fleener2, Jim Gamble2, Arlene Gundersen2,7, Verna Immingan8, Lisa Jackson7, Alice Kalmakoff7, Andrew Kliskey1, Sharon Merculief9, Delbert Pungowiyi8, Olga (Olia) Sutton6, Eddie Ungott3, Joni Ungott3, Jessica Veldstra2 .
    [Show full text]
  • Etylin Publication1-90X60
    Chukotka Wild Reindeer Herd Monitoring 2008-2009 CARMA population and geography distribution. Current Distribution of the Chukotka Wild Reindeer Population Grazing and worried wild reindeer herd, Sernaya river, Ust-Belaya tundra Canada — 1500000 Alaska — 800000 Taimyr— 700000 Sakha (Yakutia) — 350000 Chukotka— 159000 Reindeer in the - Panoramic picture of the Pegtymel' river's rock with Chukotka history carvings - Ancient reindeer hunters' rock carvings - Here was seasonal cross- Sampling according to CARMA methods ing over the river. You can easy imagine ordinary pic- ture for past years: thou- sand reindeers follow to the river, cross it and hunters harvest them in the river. - prevailing topic: hunter being in a small boat strikes a huge figure of the wild reindeer This topic repeated Infestation of wild reindeer Wild reindeer female car- dozen of times in one style skin by subcutaneous gadfly cass, Ust-Belaya river tun- became a canon and proved dra, March 2008 its ceremonial magic mean- ing. The Dynamics of Domestic and Wild Reindeer Populations of Chukotka Domestic Reindeer Herd Estimation of the Central Scientific Re- search Games The first results of cooperation Lab with geneticist Expert Dr. Marina Kholodova Estimation Chukchi thanksgiving rite Chukotka reindeer herders’ tradi- tional knowledges, reindeer foot- prints Chukotka wild reindeer monitoring network wild domestic is supported by reindeer herders International Scientific Seminar: “Interactions of the domestic and wild reindeer”. Wild reindeer in domestic reindeer herd Typical 2-year wild reindeer Poaching is not a fugitive Seminar was held in the city of Anadyr on March 5-7, 2003; Among seminar participants were: · Reindeer herders and representatives of the Unions of Reindeer Herders of Chukotka and Russia; · Representatives of the Kawerak Reindeer Herders Association; AUTHORS (c) Translation Vladimir Etylin, Senior Scientist of the Vladislav Nuvano, Senior Olga Etylina · Scientists from Moscow, Norilsk, Yakutsk, Magadan and Anadyr; Ethnography Lab.
    [Show full text]
  • The SIBERIAN LETTERS of GEORGE KENNAN the Elder, 1866-1867
    The SIBERIAN LETTERS of GEORGE KENNAN the Elder, 1866-1867 Susan Smith-Peter O CCASIONAL PAPER # 310 The Kennan Institute is a division of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Through its programs of residential scholarships, meetings, and publications, the Institute encourages scholarship on the successor states to the Soviet Union, embracing a broad range of fields in the social sciences and humanities. The Kennan Institute is supported by contributions from foundations, corporations, individuals, and the United States Government. Kennan Institute Occasional Papers Occasional Papers are submitted by Kennan Institute scholars and visiting speakers. The Kennan Institute makes Occasional Papers available to all those interested. Occasional Papers published since 1999 are available on the Institute’s website, www.wilsoncenter.org/kennan. This Occasional Paper has been produced with the support of the George F. Kennan Fund. The Kennan Institute is most grateful for this support. The views expressed in Kennan Institute Occasional Papers are those of the author. The author would like to thank her students in History 401, Seminar in Advanced Historical Study, at the College of Staten Island/ City University of New York, for their work on George Kennan and his letters. Cover Image: George Kennan the Elder, 1868 © 2016 Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, D.C. www.wilsoncenter.org ISBN: 978-1-938027-53-6 THE WILSON CENTER, established by Congress in 1968 and headquartered in Washington, D.C., is a living national memorial to President Wilson. The Center’s mission is to commemorate the ideals and concerns of Woodrow Wilson by providing a link between the worlds of ideas and policy, while fostering research, study, discussion, and collaboration among a broad spectrum of individuals concerned with policy and scholarship in national and international affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Magadan Oblast's Investment Potential February 2015
    Magadan Oblast’s Investment Potential (Regional Analysis Report, February 2015) Table of Contents: MAGADAN OBLAST’S INVESTMENT POTENTIAL General Information Economy FEBRUARY 2015 Investment Activity in the Region Key Investment Projects Investment Climate Investor Guidelines The Region’s Economic Prospects Appendices Magadan Oblast’s Investment Potential (Regional Analysis Report, February 2015) 2 General Information Magadan Oblast is a federal subject (constituent entity) of Russia, located in the north- east of the Far Eastern Federal District. Magadan Oblast was established on December 3, 1953. Until 1992, the region included Chukotka Autonomous Okrug. The Oblast’s administrative, social and economic center is the city of Magadan, which has over 67% of the region’s population and is home to many large organizations. Magadan is 7,110 km away from Moscow. Magadan Oblast on the Russian Federation map: Источник: http://ru.wikipedia.org Magadan Oblast covers an area of around 462,500 sq. km1, which makes it the 11th largest region of Russia. At the same time, the Oblast is one of the most sparsely populated places in the country (population density was 0.33 people per 1 km2 as of January 1, 2014). It stretches 930 km from north to south and 960 km from west to east. Geographically, it is part of Russia’s Extreme North-East, a land-locked area characterized by a severe climate. The Oblast is washed by the Sea of Okhotsk. Land boundaries are in thinly populated mountainous areas. The Oblast borders with Khabarovsk Krai in the west, Sakha Republic (Yakutia) in the north-west, Chukotka Autonomous Okrug in the north- east, and with Kamchatka Krai in the south-east.
    [Show full text]