<<

,. • • _.... , .,- - ''At Union Bank, ure urork hard to ea1·11your i.1·11st.'' -He nry A. Leslie. Pmsiclen 1mid Chi er l'.xec;utiv c (Jlnc(:i'

Un.ion Bank works closely wilh man y Alabama attmneys in U1eadminislralion of trusts and estates. Ow ' investn1ent capabilities have increased dramati cally in the past yea r by the addition of a state-of-U1e-artcomputerized system. As Alabama 's largest independ ent bank , we control all our investtnent processing wiUli.n Lhe Trust Dep arlmenl to assure constant attention and cornp.lete confidentiality l'oryoL1rclient s. We invite your questions about Union Bank's tru st services. Ow· exper ienced I rust officers will be glad to discuss m1y busine ss, financial 0 1· aclntinislra tive aspect of ilie services we pro vide.

11111>11 BAJ1K & TRUSl: a,srnrnc, 60 Commerce Street Montgom e1y, Alabama 36104 (205) 265-8201 _ Three in a ro\V ... A winning comb inati on for Alabam a attorneys.

$59.95

$69.95

$34.95

THEJ~~f :HARRISONCONJPANY, PU BLISHERS 3110 Crossan~ Pnrk • Norcros., Georgia 30071 __ _. :11ary~~...... _.,,,..,. Th, Abblm,, Scl!Wa. P O la,•~ Mc.-,,g J, AL ..- THE MARCH 1983 l'llfR (aef:) ~IJlj Robcn A lh 1ff,lt, - fl..dic.>r Jm Nc,wcll...... t.Utlllg.. 11..dilf.lf BOARD OF EDITORS

Phillip E. Ad1ma,. Jr.. Opc:lib • 8,uion W. A1he. 1\uicw'nka • R.obr:rtP . Ocani.Kon.)klbdc: • Vamcm Penn l'>u,,nt , Mo.wp w:c, • Pund: H- GtWct,. It~ Hunuwdk • kobtn ll,. H.uwood . ,, ., T11K•• - • 0...,., L,...... J,, Mol>ilc • Wilham D. M-. E...... - • L llr

N«bomc C. Scone, ,,., 81y &fiacttc • Prahlc nt \V'1U1.1ml\. t-laJnQ)n.,Jr .,. Birmingham• l"-n:tidmt•cka Ourio fl. Ad.tu. o.dcviUc . V'ttt Ptaidcnt. ~ T , H11mcr, ~l.;,...guuo) • Scamty

BOARD OF _ ___,,- _..___ ---.,_ COMMISSIONERS i..-::-- 1 -- 11t.Omait.EdwlldP .1'1mcr-,Jr... Owom • 1nd0ttuh.. i:=.~==-=·------··----···- .. -·-= Bankrupt cy practice under r. Rkhard Han.Icy, Otn:nvillc• vd Cir~ J, Gorm,n ~--- .. Hot.1itoo. Jr., Et.ifa,1,11.a• 4th Omait, H.a.nyW . Gainblt, 1r--- ..-----·--· ~--·- the rul~ Jr.,Scl,na • fth Clrc;u.11, Charle$R. Ada.ir, 08\1\ llt • 0th =::.::-~=1·~,v-=~~===-:..t:..,,':E::\:~...-.: E:-::. .,~ "::".:.::: ... -pg. 8+ Qr(W~ W•hcr I•, Cn:,wnoVtt, Tusealoou • 71.h(lrculi-,. H4 W'f"l( Lovt, AnnistQn • Ith Circuit.llobcn Str.1ub, Although the United S12.ccsSupreme Dean,, • och Orcui, .. Witli.un D. Scnagp, fr., ft. in Payn< • 1och Circui c, W~rrcn 8. Ug.htfooc , Coun decision Ntirthen, Piptlinr de­ 811:nunJNm • nth Cucmi. Srnnrt O'&n_ooq,, Jr .• clued the Bankruptcy Rcfonn Act of Fiottntt • whCircw.JO 1?78 unconstinnion2l, the promulgation 0.-. 8m H. t1...._ 1,. ~lcbk • 14d>0-. fociP . of• special rule 1w allowed the ~Jr .,J...... • umaro..AlbcnW . Olpland, bw · Mon1gomc-ry • 10olh Cuant, Ludgcr 0 , +\i anan, = ruptcy system ro function pending re­ Gad•dcn • 17eh Oirau-c~ R..kb.l.rd $, Manlty , medial legi~latioo. Dcmnpolj• • 1lrh Ci.rcuit. Olivier r. Head , Col\&inbm:u• f«h Clrmit, Ted Taylot, Pranvllk • icth Om,i. t, \Vllk Baxky. Oocha11• 1.J:M 01\'.Ull, n,001o . Garren, brcw1on • ;und O ro.air, Har(lold Albruron, Andaluila • a1rd Circuit, G,ry C. Huckaby, 1-lunuv,lk • 1;41h Cuc:un, L E- Gola, Vernon • >1th The gulf separating i?int Or R. H..., J•.. common -.a. • loldl Oiwi&. J, Dao &.a . Folconnnuc ~11.og tbt put,IICtbOfl Nonmembtt ....,..,ipWM. $tl,.OO in lhc UnMedSum. »cJ.00 clwwfiaLAl~-bic~Sinsle---M'(,.._ IJ,OCI, ISSUE IN BRIEF

Regul ar Featur es President's Page ...... 68 Executive Director's Report ...... 69 Book review­ Letters to the Editor . . . . 71 Alabama Law ofD amages Riding the Circuits . . . . . 78 -pg. 87 CLE News and Events . . 80 Measurement and proofof damages in Young Lawyers' Section . 83 civil litigation often presents a bewil­ Avoiding Legal Malpractice dering array of n ues and cx-ceptions. A Claims ...... 88 new ueatise offers a practical explana· tion of this area of the law. Recent Decisions ...... 90 Bar Briefs ...... 94 Legislative Wrap-Up . . . . 98 The Lighter Side of Law ...... 106 About Members, Among Do you know how to write Firms ...... 109 a fee letter ? General Counsel -pg. 100 Opinion s ...... no Disciplinary Report . . . . . 111 A frequent soLLrceof con.flict between an attorney and client is a misun­ The Final Judgment . . . . 113 derstanding of the fee arrangement. This Classifieds ...... 115 po t enti al prob lem ca n be avo ided Et Cetera ...... 116 through the use of a clearan d concise fee letter.

What' s news statewide? -pg. 94 Bar exam challenged in coun, Ala· bama wins ABA Law Day Award, Su­ preme Coun adopts new criminal nues, Prt.lident- clect of the ABA speaks at Montgomery meeting, and other news briefs of interest inside. GJ>residettt's <¥age

Th e idea beh ind this page is to ing to have the cooperatio n ofd 1c Office Association, as our guest speaker at the bring to the attention of d1c members of of the Compt roller and also of the Ad­ Bench and Bar luncheon. H e is a de­ the Bar matters whid 1 the writer thinks ministrat ive Office of Couru in atuck­ lightful and interesting Texas lawyer, might bcof particula r interest and to also ing this problem. and l am confidcnr you will enjoy meet· create an awareness of particular prob­ ln tl1is regard, ] feel compelled tosra tc ing him and listening ro his rcmark.s. lems fuccd by the Bar. that d1c Disciplinary Co mmission and The Alabama Lawyer die st:lff arc doing an cxcdlcor job in CLE crying ro keep o ur doc ket of disciplinary 1 have rccch,'--dno adverseco1n mcnrs First , let's talk about Co ntinuing proceedings current and to hand all wid1 respect to the new fonnar of T/Je Legal Educ~tion . 111erc arc 6,943 mem­ comp laints c.,pcditio usly. Alabama, Lawyer. I would like to remark bers of the Alabama State Bar who arc here d,nt we willcontin ue to make d1is a subject ro the rules governing continu­ Board of Bar Examiners publication by lawyers for lawyers aod ing legal education. As of the last of Jan· of the hardest working grou ps of that the Board of Bar Comm issioners uary nincry•rwo percent of those mcm­ the Bar is the Board of Bar Examiners. has made it abundantl y dea r this must be bcts have complied by submitting their The lawyers who have undertaken to done. We appropriate a good bitofyou r rcpom. We thiok this is a great response serve on this Board really do a tremen­ money each year to die publication and and the members arc to be commend ed dous job and are fuced wid1 a tremen­ \V C have a.continuing duty to sec that ,vc for their cooperatio n and assisrancc. We do us burden . Recently appointed to fill give you a first class job. have had some problem with getting re­ vacancies o n the d1frtL-.:n-mcmberboard Conclusion pons from members who arc exempt , arc Robert L. Potts , Janics F. H ughey , bu r who muse, nevertheless, file a com­ Jr., Max C. Pope, George P. Ford and The Depar tm ent of Exam i,iers of pliance rcp,,rr. And so you can sec, d1c Dow M. Perry, Jr. ln July, 429 candi ­ Public Accounts has recently comp leted active pra<..1:icingatt orneys have, by and da tes rook ou r exam. Three hu nd red an audit of the records of the Alabama large , complied. A number of extensions thirry-1:ivewe re certified ro the Supreme Bar and c.,ccpr for o ne or 1wo recom­ had been granted as of January 31st. We Court. Of the coral, forty -one were "rc­ menda tions with respect to some minor shall have no alternative with respect to pcars" and of thatnumb cr eleven passed. rc::commcnd atioos which they made as to d1ose who do not co mply except ro The rather meager stipend which our imcmal cont ro ls, we passed with flying comply ourselves with the Ruic and in­ examiners rcccivc is more than justified colors. sti tute the proceedings which arc man­ when you consider the job of grading Since 1 have not seen fit in diis mes­ dated. 429 paper s on just ()Ile of the examina­ sage to emote o r en1,,agc in platirudcs, it tions. is somewh at brief, but I hope d1at it has Fees in Indigent Cases served the purpose ofbru iging you up to Next, on d1c subject of Fees in lncli­ Annual Meeting date on som e of our functions. We al­ gcnr Cases. This is a follow-up co my The Annual Meeting will bei held n ways welcome inquiries from lawyers remark.~in d1e last "Message" and to let Birmingham in July and, as always, the and wiUbe glad to respond in1mcdia.ccly ro ru1yqu e$tioos you might have about you know that the sraff of the Cente r for Binn ingham Bar will do a tremendous ru1yof our progra ms. Pro fessional Responsibility is pursui ng job. We will be honored to have Morris the matter vigorously . We arc continu- Harrell, president of the American Bar Nor bo rne C. Stone, Jr. ~xecutive

W hat docs the Sure Highway De· pend )'OUrmonies in acoordaoccwith 3 membership cards for all practic.tl pur­ p:imnem, the Sr.ire Health Dcpamncnt, mty-p3gc (plus cxhibu:s) rt12J1ualof fis. ~ - the Publk Safeiy Depanrncnr md the cnJoperation The apcndirun:s of these You should purchase your license in Alabama Smc Bar have in common? monies,while directed by the Board of October of each year, but the issuing They're all four ngcncicsof rhc Srareof Bar Commis.1ioners, must be in accord­ authority, the probate judge or license Alabama. ance with state faw. commissioner , has undl the 20th of You m,y ask, "Why am I being cold Since gifts, rood, beverages and ad­ November to forward d1c funds co rhe d1is?1' vertisements arc not proper subjccrs for Revenue lxporr mem which thc:n sub­ Well, r will fret1ucndy be disrussing the cxpcndinorcof stare monies, we fund mits same ro the srncc 1rc3mrcr. It is some event or future undcrrnklng of the our convcncions from registration Ices. usually March before a certified lisc is srarr bar and in the conversation will be We do 1101 purchase gifts nor do we sem ro tl1csrarc bar. Special Membership stopped mid·.scmcncc 10 c:."tplain, for in· advertise the vast number of worthwhile card< are issued upon receipt of dues ro srnncc, "Why does tl1c president of the programs for whld1 we arc solicited. our Sp«i•I Members since these dues arc SC3tc bar or a committee cha.irmm need Politic.ti contributions from scare funds remitted directly 10 die narc bar. Ir prior approv.tl of the govemor ro attend arc likewise prohibit<-d. would require J);JSS;lgeof lcgisfation to ;an Out·of-S1-atemcetingr' The reason: allow ;alldues for liccoscsrobe collected the mce lnr comes under stare rravd Commission Compc:os:atioo by the s«tttll') '• This type legislation has regulations :ind, if one is ro be rcim­ been discus.~ with themre=r. A burscd for travel, dtis prior approval is The law permitsthe rcimburscn,corof problem uca exists with regard ro the rcqufrcd. commissioners for thcir service on the revenuethe iss-tLing:authorities no,, , re­ The bar assocfation budget is ap­ Commission to the extent authoriz.cd by ceive. In our larger c0Lt11ticsthis is a proved by the State legislature. Our law, namely a limit of 10~ per mile and a substantial amount of money. monies ore ap1>roprintcdcoch year by the ma.,imum of S;o per day as per diem. One nd\',inmgc to you- d1c lawyer­ legislature even though we ncitl1cr seek Commis,ioncrs receive no additiona l and the srntc bar would be tl1cbar's abil­ nor receive monies from d1c General compensation for their service. A com­ ity ro bill you nnd monitor your license Fund, Monies flow into n special crust missioners meeting is usually be.ldon a to insure against delinquencies. A sec­ fund from the annual license fee you pay, single day in which cose the commis­ ond advanragc would be die elimination the e.,nminarion fee paid by applicants, sioners wiU receive mileage and a per of a c;i,llcr and the Deparcment of license fee takes ro rcnch the srarc bar Examiners of rllblic Accounts. We ex· fluid presently precludes the issuance of A Convenient, Up -to-Date Reference ALABAMA RULES 1 1 ANN ~~ TATED Alabama Rul es Ann otat ed. 1983 Columbia. Law publishers since 1855. Edition, provides a convenient reference The Michie Company has become one of source for the practitioner. Up-to-da te the nation's leading publishers of state throu gh January 1. 1983, it contains all codes. legal treatises. handbooks and rules promu lgated by the Alaba ma case books. Supreme Court, with complete annota· tions, as well as federal circuit and district court rules with annotattons to cases To order your copy. contact our sales arising in Alabama. An index follows each representative or use the coupon below . set of rules. Th is guidebook is designed to minimi.,e research and save valuable time for the prac ticing attorn ey. ===THE======MICHIEC OMP ANY From the Publisher of the Code of Alabama ~ JAMES R. SHROYER The Michie Com pany, publisher of the P.O. Box 717 Code of Alabama, publishes state codes Pelham, Alabama 35U4 for seventeen states and the District of (205) 326-9899 r·-·------TIIE ·------, P.O . Box7587 Charlottesville. VI\ 22906 18041295-6171 0 Pl~sc send me _ _ cop10$ol Alabama Rules Nam•------~ Ann otat ed, 1983Edition. 01 S2MO' each. I under· slllnd thnt I may return my purchase within 30 days Address------JJnot completely satisfied. 0 payment enclosed D blll me, plU4shipping and handling

' plus lh lppu,g. handling and sales tu when, appUcablo Comments on th e new for mat ... "1 have just received and read Tlie Alabama Lawyerfor January 1983. It is excdlem and I oongrarulate )'OU on its form and substance. I look for­ ward co funher issues •.. " Douglas Arant Birmingham

"1 ,•cry much enjoyed reviewing the January cdirion of T/Jr Alabama Lawyer. I was very pleased with the new format and am certain chat T/Jt Lb'TTBRS 10 THE EDITOR Alabama Lmvytr will be of even greater service to the Bar." The pu~ of the: Letters to the: Edi1orcolwnn is to provide a forum for the c.tprcssionof the rc::idcrs'views. Rc::idcrs of T/Jt Alnb1111111LaA'Jt7' arc invited to Nathanid Hansford submit short letters, not exceeding~}O words, cxpt:'CSSingtheir opinions or giving Tuscaloosa infomuuion ~• ro any mancr appearing in the publication or otherwise. The editor reserves the right to select the excerpts therefrom ro publish. Unlessotherwise expressed by the author, all lcncrsspecific.\llyoddrcsscdas Letters to the Editor will "I was travelling t.he early part of be candidate.~for publicuion in T/JeAlnbnmn 1.ii,,,cr. 1J1c publication of a letter this week and cook with me die new docs nor, however, consrinitcan cnd()rsement ofd1c viewsex pressed. Letters co die Alabama Lall')'CT. T am thrilled with Editor should be sent ro: d1c public.1do11. It exceed$my high- est expcctan.o n ... " The Alnbama Lawyer Albert Copeland Leners ro the Ediror Montgomery P.O. Box+•SC! Momgomcry, AL 36to1

... and one lettt1• to dtc president How docs one measure suc­ ccss?Most would agree dtat being ~--0 president of the stare bar is quite an -JI;- ... -. honorable position; however, mer =--·- looking at the January issueof T/Je Alabama Lau,ycr, bar commissioner Nelson Vinson sec an c:vcnhigher goal for his frirnd Norborne Stone. Remembering a song of the early seventies, Mr. Vinson begancutting and pasting and within a fewminurcs our bar president had his picrure on "the cover of the Rolli119 St1111e!' [f you didn't happen co get that issue of the Rolli11gSto11e , at least you have a picture of a rolling Stone .on d,e cover of your A lnbamn Lawyer. Congratulati ons to Norborne Scone for his "genuine" success and •. • ..:i.y co Nelson Vinson who has proven CaroooniscDcnn i11R . Baileyis -:i rncn1bcror the la,Y O rmof ' Rushton,Smk cly. fohnston& Garrett,P.A . thac lawyers really do hnve a sense of in Monrg<-.1~ hum or!

Tix A ln/NrmnL,r"'Y" 71 Joint Tenancy and Tenancy in Common of Real Property - The Gulf Separating Them

Robert P. Denniston RJJbtnP . Dmmsnm isa memberof rlu /n,r fi1111af Gnllnlu , Dnmist,111& 01

C ameDurant w.\S in " quandary. inheritance.On December 19, 19n , Car· Bcany, and with • special conrurring She didn't reallykn ow just what ro do. ric h,.d exc-curcda deed COOl'cyingall but opinion by Justice Embry, our Supreme 11,e yc:rr was 1977. A long bout with si.~of their d1ircy-onc and one half acres Court held thnt these rwo deeds createdn dinbcrcs had already cosr her both legs to one of her sons, Steve Hom,ic:k. Her rcnancy in common on rhe parr of Roy and now she wassuOc:ring from a host of other son had been a patic'llt in a V. A. ru1dCarrie for life, with cross-contingent other illnesses. Looking back o,-cr the hospiralfor a long time. This bitofncws remainders ro the sur\'ivor in fee, indc· )'CeU'Ssince she :ind Roy married in 1967, was communic.itcdt o Roy two or th.rec srructiblc. The remainderinterest in Ro)• she worried 3bout what w;u going ro cbys after the funer;al. 11,us came about as rhe survi'"or1V3S impregnable 3gainst happen ro their property whc:nshe was Dumnu •.Bamriclt , 409 So. 2d 731 (Ala. rJ,c 1977 d~d from Carrie to her son, gone. Would her own rons, born of an 198 1). Sccvc. JusticesMaddox, Paulkncr, Jones cnrlicr marriage, ever shore in what she Nom1an J. G~lc, Jr. (of the Mobile and Adams dissented , with Justice and Roy had work-.-dso ha,:dfor? Wot~d Bar) examined the dc,-ds w,der which Adams offering his own opinion and Roy'sown two children someday gcr ir the Durants acquin:dtitle . One appeared Justice Maddox writing an opinion with :ill? 10 come squard}' under the docrrine or wluch J usricc Jones concurred. All of chis just didn't lCCl1l to be a Nu11nP. Ktitl,, 289 Al:l. S 18. 268, So. 2d problem in the early ye:1rsof their mar­ 792 ( 1972). The gr.inting dausc con· riage when she and Roy bought the l'C)'cd to Roy and Carrie " . . . during f.1mt,parcel by parcel. lt seemed then so their joint lives, and upon die death of simple and convenient and fair for rhc either of them, then to rhe survivor of "You can 't cve1· rr-ssuttie11 two or dtcm to pur both dtcir names in them in fee simple, and ro the heirs and 1WB9onething ." The treat - die deeds. The bwyer said with survivor· assigns of such survivor forel'cr.n Nor· 111entof j oint tenancy and ship dcc-dsit would ;alljust passone cby nun sighed :ind set thi< one aridtc. 10 the one that outlived the other. Two of rbc dean had identicalgr.me · tennncy in u,mnw,i in Ala­ Six months later poor Carrie passed mg da= as follows: bn,,,a bears witn ess to this on 1ohcrreward .1l1ercwasno will Roy " ... astcnanrs in common and wid1 adage. thought about the land. ~well, rhar's the cqu,al rights and intcrcsrs. for rhc waywe agreeda ll along. Now die land is pc.nodor rcrm thnr the sn,d Gran­ mine. Deep down in my heart l believe tees shall both surviveand unto die Cirrie would havepro1 •ided for my chil­ survivorof the said Granrs'CS, ar the death of the orhcr ... " dren somroay if l had gone first. Some· Is there n practicing 1~11,ycr in J\b . day 1. "ill ba1·e to s« that Steve (one of TI1cserwo deeds Nonnan decided to use bama who docsnor OCC1Sionallydraft a Carrie's sons) gcrs hi~ inhcritlllec.~ lO restthescopc of rhc decisioninN,m11 . deed! What docs this dcci$ionportend Linlc did Rov know at the time that Wid1OiicfJusticc Torbcrr writing for for all of us? TI1isarticle buggests a t least Srcvchad a helping hnnd in seeing to his himselfa nd Justices Almon, Shores and some an~wcrs. ,, As the)' used to say in the military spelled d1c difference bcnvccn rJ1osetwo tenru1C)' in common is intended, lan­ services, " You can'c ever assume a dog­ decisions. 11,osc holding to this view guage expressly to that effect should be gone thing.• 111c creaanenc of joinc ten· would likely argue tl1ar witl1 future used in a sin1ilar fashion. ln the case of ancy and tenancy in commo n in Alabama changes on the bench the Court will re­ joint tenancy, it would appc-ar from rJ1e bears wimess ro this adage. From the treat from its mling inDurant and might statute ru1ddecisions that any language cime of the abolition of joint tenancies by even ovcnule it. In this particular in• malting it clear that the joint tenants arc the Legislature shortly after Alabama Stance the aud1or is not particularly im· to have a right of survivorship would be achiev~-d statehood until 1924, it was pressed with d1is suggestion, bur finds adequate . Since it is c()Jlceivable that generally considered by the Bar that with d1e division in d1c Court over the issues minds might differ on the precise the demise of joint tenancy dierc existed in D11rti11tnevertheless a cause for much meaning of "right of survivorship," cau· in our jurispmdence only tenancy in uncertainty. As questions are presented tion suggests the wisdom of such common , without any form of survivor­ in the future involving rctroacrivity, the language as "ru1d upon the deat h ()f ship. In that yearche Alab

73 die tw0 deeds in D,,mm might wcll in• ownership as joint tcnfflts w,th right of q1n,-cy.i.nccs, words darly spccifymg \11.elitigation. sUMvorsbip under Codeof Ah. ( 19-,5 ), c-1dlcrwjoint tcn.mcy" or wtmancy 1n By thcir very narurc, cross,oncingcnt §35-4-7." This, 10 the writer, suggests common" arc 1t1orc ) ignilicant thiln remainder inrercstSwou ld oppcar to be tWOpoints. words describing the survh·orship imer· indestructible (withour consent of all First, the Coun had die option co con· esr. Despite the decision in Smitb. the rcmaindcrmen) bccallScit cannot be :is· strue the habcndwn clause merely ns cautious scrivener is advised co use rhc ccrt:1incd which mnaindcr inu:rcst will showing a clear intent to provide for a words ~as joint tenants" rather than survive the other; :allof which pro'1dcs a tide ,vid, sun'ivorship while ncvcrthc­ ~during thcir joinr lives" so as ro funhcr pmcnr ,ugwncnt for mcorporation of kss looking to the gr.mting clause in emphasw: chat a JOint tmancy is in­ langwgc which clearlyconrcmplatcs die order to find thcn3rurcofthc tide which rcndcd. rwo separate estates-life inrercsi:sand wasco be effective prior to the dead, of In die Mobile area mosr l-Oncrarnfor rcmnindcr inrcrc~,s. either grantee. Had it laid more empha­ rhc purchase and sale of homes arc in Lhe Yct, contemplating rl1ce ndless variety sis 011t he procL-dcnceuf the granting fon11 of accepted purcluse offers on of situations whicl1can ru1ddo arise, it is clause, in the writds opinion, it could primed forms llScdby real csrate broker.;. not difficulr to imagine that one day the ha,·c: found a tco311cyin common .11td Typioilly there is a limited space oc a Court, despite 1:angwgcwhich includes could still h3ve gi,·cn effect to me blank t.0 indicate wherher or not the "'rcn.mt.sin common" and "':sun;vor· h2bcndum clause as creating a survi,'Or· conv~a: is to be ~with sul'\ivorship." slup," will determine from the remaining ship (:ubcit :an indestructible survi,'Ot· The author is unf:uniliar with the prac­ language in the deed dm the parties did ship). The writer suspects that the Coun ncc in mosc pans of rhc srace whc:rc 110c imend the survivorship interests ro was influenced in its decision by the fuct lawyers customar ily draft such be indestructible. Whctl1c1·it will rccog­ that Lherc is a srncmory basis for sur· agrecmems for rhc p:irtics. lo any event, ni1.ca third carcgory consisting of a ten· vivorship :unong joinr tenants (§35-4·7) Ir seems ckar that the parties co such J.nC)' in common wirh a "ckstructibk" nnd only caselaw ,upporting the con• transactions (311dcertainly rhe grantttS ) survivorship or a joinr tcn:llk.l' (dcspirc ccp1 under tenancy in commoo. Such a now need to be m3dc aw;irc bv some­ rcnanl")' in common language in the distinction should no longer be matcri:u body !hat a choice:1$ available,;., diem document), I :un unwilling ro prcdin . since the C.Ounh:15 so clearly recognized whc11:they desire a Sul'\•ivorshipprovi ­ We do know that before Dtmmt die the validity of survivorship under ten· sion. Abscm such infonnation, d1eywill Court, on a nwnbcr of occasions, re­ .11·1c..1rin co1nn1on. noc be in a position tO m~kc an info1111cd ferred to documcms which used tenancy Second, the use of the words "for their decision. Hctetoforc, rhe discussion has in common language ns having created a joint lives" is equated by the C.Ounwith focusedupon rhe passage of tide ar the joint tenancy. Sec Gm111ii11e• Ddni,u, "as joint tenants" and rhcrcfottccxcluddl rime of death of the first grantee and the 29·1 Ala. 443 ,3 18 So. 2d 681 ( 1975 ). It die indestructible sul'\;,·orship which l:ucr dead, of the survh·or, the con,·cni· is safe to pr:t:dictthat many bwycrs will may be :wociated wirh 1cnancyin com· cna: of bypassing probate of the will of develop language whidi closely tracks mon. To my opinion the Court did not die first ro die, and she ~nee t:tJC impli­ 1.helanguage Chief Justice Torbcn used need ro reach this conclusion in order IO Cltions. Those persons who have advised in writing his op inion. recognize the survivorship provision in the parties on such matters in the past Some deeds use the language," A and Smith. will now likely be burdcnc-d with the 8 for (or during) d1eir joint lives, and The Li.nguagedescribing survivorship furrher responsibility of explaining the upon thcdcarh of cithcrof thcm. .• n On m3y not be adc-quacero distinguish be­ kgal differences between s,m,ivorship many occasion~in the pm the coun has tween the cwo cypcsof ownership. Even :unong joint tcn31lrs and sul'\frorship not cooccmed icscu· with precision in where joint ownerslup with survivorship among tenants in common. 111oscof us determining whether a joint tenancy or n is expressed"'d'lc rc1lHtinder intcrc.stS arc who hnve ciutioncd rcaltors as to cl1eir tenancy in common WM created, being cross remainders ruid coch one is contin­ responsibilities and linbilitics in this area only inrcresred in the existence or gent upon rhe prior death of die joint should now alert rJ1en1to dus new clc· nonexistenceof a v.tlidsurvivorship pro­ owner. It is, therefore, clearly the rom· mcnt, and lawyers, in advising 3D)' '1$iOn.HL'llceforrh, impreci sion in such mon law chanctcriStic of sc,·erabilicy dients in such cran~aions, must cer­ l:anguage mtl) ' pro\'olcc litigation as to among joinr owners which makes such tainly be alat to rhe dintingcnrre­ Andn,ws foe life in an undivided half the parties had invoked the equity juris­ mainder estates? The question bas been interest in die propcny. lntcrcscingly diction of die Court and had the power substantially answered in the post­ c,1ough, under this line of reasoning themselves to divide the tenancy by Bcmhanl,pre-Nmm decision of Brown v. Mrs. Andtews wound up owning both ngrcemcnt, die 01:ioccllor was empow­ .1111drews,288 Ab. I I I , 257 So. 2d 356 of the contingent remainder estates, so ered by his equity jurisdiction to supply ( 1972),au thored by Justia:McCall, but that if Mr. Andtcws survives bis wife, her such agreement for either party. ft with Justice Maddo x and Chief Justice estate in die property will descend and shouldn't be long befon: die prdcnt Su· Heflin dissenting . The two deeds in vcsi either under the laws of descent and prcme Court will be provided wim me question conveyed die propcny to Mr . distribution or in ,ccordancc with her opporrunity ro consider this sameques­ and Mrs. Andrew s, during their joint will. It is alsoco be observed d1ar under tion in die wake of its decision D11ra11t. lives, and upon the death of either of §35,6 -20 die owner of the life estate in the hnlf undivided interest for the life of Bod, in Owensand in Ki//111gnwrt/111, them, d1cn to d1csu.rvivorofchem in fee Mr. Andrews is en tided to a sale for divi­ Kil/i,,gswon/J,284 Ala. 524, 226 So. 2d sim ple. Shordy nfi:crwnrds, the couple 308 ( 1969) the Coun rclicd in part upon conveyed all of the property to a straw sion. lhe fuct that, by virtue of cross bills, both man, who then rcconvcycd a fee simple: Thm: is considerable bw in other jurisdictions rccogruzing i:bat if a joint grantees had applied for equitable relief. title to Mrs. Andrews alone. The rwo A future spouse-litigant relying upon a subsequent conveyances were held tO be ten:uicy exists, the levy of cx.ccution deed clearly expressed in terms of ten· in fraud of crcdicors in a prior litigation ngninscsum interest docs work a sc"cr­ ancy in common wi.th survivo rship may in which the coun impressed • Lien nncc of die joint tenancy aldiough the mere entry of judgment againsr the plication of D11m111might appear un­ Vicissirudcs of the rypc which buf· interest of a joint tenant docs not alone likely, but agile minds may find :in ap­ feted the lives of Carrie and Roy Dumm operate as a scvc=ce. ln the light of the propriate hardship case worthy of the should sound f:uniliarm lawyersin every decision in Num, it would be logical for attempt The ,igorou.s dissents in Dr,. • part of Alab:i.ma. We can cakeno comfort our Supreme Court to so hold, without mlll :tnd the p~ge of )""1l'S betwcm th:i.t,perhaps b)•ch:i.nce alone, Roy :ind having to overrule s,.,,.,,,, Nu11nandDumm suggcsrthartheCourt his stepson each wound up with some of The writer has seen S<'Veralsituations ma)•be tempted to consider sometype of the propcny, b«ausc: the \\c'Ordingin all in which a federal w: lien w.u levied rcuvactivc striaurcs upon the scope of of the deeds w.u no1 identical. 11 is ap, against one spouse where ch.e spouses that decision. parent thar tile difference bcr.vccn "dc­ held title under• survivorship deed. Aca Structibillcy"and "indestructibility" can time when ir was assumed char there Tiie Alabama Uniform Discl3imcrof make a profound difference in the lives could be no severance without the con· Property Interests Acr, §35.17.1 er seq, ru1dfortunes of some among our clients. sent of both grnncccs, the wife w:tSable Ala. Code ( 1975), was adopted shortly Either a method should be devised for co purch:tSct he life esrnrco f her husband before the decision in D1111mt.T he stat· routinely cxplnining these discinctioosto at an execution sale for a rclativdy nomi· urc provides a framework for disclaimer the parties to au"s urvivorship~contracts nal nmouni. TI1cs ituation could be fur of wrious property inccrcsrs, including and conveyancesso that they can make less comforting co die parties if they were that of • "s urviving joint rcn:i.n1." informed choices, or steps should be held to be joint tenants with survivor· Nowhere docs i1 make reference to the t:ikcn to obli1crnre the disrinction in ship and if a severancecould be forced. interest of a survi,'Or :i.moogt<:nants in AJ.ab;unabnwccn the twO estates, so that common with cross,conringcnt remain­ Yeranother=• awaiting clarification there will be ()nly one, be ir ~dcstructi· der inn:rcsu. involves rc1roactiviry. In Jnwon v. bk-"or "indcsrructiblc!'O Fil/11u,rt, 367 So. 2d 948 (Ala. 1979) the Court refused to give tctroactivc appli· cation ro Nu1111in • joint tenancy with survivorship simation created under a deed executed after Bm,/Jnrtl. There the husband-joint tenant artcmpted a sever· ancc by conveying 10 n third party and then died (all prior coNwm) and a title lawyer ,·cndcred nn optnion to a pur· chaser of die cntirc title from the surviv­ ing wife. TI,c Court detcm,ined chat the title attorney had relied upon Bernhard. Counsc:l for both parries in their briefs in Dumm :i.rguro the qw:stion of rec· roactiviry. although the Coun found it unn=sary to reach that issue. Since DurnnJ distinguished without ovcrrul· ing N11,ma li01irntionon rccroacriveap-

CONSUL TING METEOROLO GIST FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY , INC. If you need expert weather advice, I can help. I have had more than 35 years experience as a Expert Evaluation. Testlmonyend Case Preparation meteorologist with the National Weather by Board·Certihed Psychiatrlsl • Auomey Service. From 1969,1980 I was manager of all ...._ ..._...,_lly_by-~ltlCI weather operations for Alabama and northwest wrongful deafh • lnundy otlenM • Coomoetency10 &,1-,d trial Florida with headquarters in Birmingham. For • T~- ~hNlln~CIPIC!tY • Con:&tact·~canpetoncy further information contact. hOlpjllNl410n • ~ ROBERT M. FERRY 217 Heath Drive Robert H. Wray, M.O., J.O., director Birmingham, AL 35243 2427 Winthrop Rd., Tall1hUlff, FL 32312 (904) 222·1540 205/96 7-6418

16 David Mahoney, Chaim1an of Avis.

Avis/rafllrts GM car1. Camti« 11,da,,J, nil..

S()(.'Cial member discounts from Avis. Of...Discou nt on Avis /0 " We Mean Business" Rat es. New 10% Discount OD Avis Special Weekly Rates. Unlimited Mileage Included . Count on Avis for fast, efficient service every time you rent a car. For guaranteed rates that include unlimited mileage . For new Avis Express service to get you from your plane LO your car wilb no standi ng in line at the rental counter. And for ne.w, bigger discounts for Bar Association members. Avis rents GM and other fine cars. And many mnjor locations feature Cadillacs nl special low rates. (Reservations for Cadillacs accepted on 24 -hour notice; subject to av~ilability.) So the next time you need 10 rent a car, for a day, a week , or 3 weekend, call Avi.s. Because Avis is trying 1111116HAIIDBI MilfS ha.mer for members of the bar. And trying harder makes AVISSf d uu1gewiltioo. OOlkc AviJ EA:pre» l\v1ulablci.i lfl

Birmingham Bar Association Hous ton County Birmingh.un Bar Associatioo offic= for 1983 uc: The Houston County Bar Associar.ionis wcll into its new year 3Dd rominUC5co grow "~th over 88 members J. N. Holt- rre5idcnr now rcgisracd. Meetings arc held the fQurth Wednesday of Thomas W. O,risrian-Vicc President every mondi at noon ar the Sheraton Inn in Dodinn. J. Mark Whfrt'-Secrctary/frens urcr Attendance at the monrJ1lymeeting s concinue5to be: James S. Lloyd is the prcsidcnr of the Bicmingham c.~tremcly high, and Houston County lawyers have shown Young Lawyer.,Sectio n for 1983- their interest in their pmf=ion and local bar association by The Bitminghom Bar Associarion holds monthly CLE such attcncbnec. Oumanding programs ha,'C bc:m lwichcoos on die chird Fricby of each monch 1111dsponsor., prescnrcd so fu rhis year by such spc:,k= as Richard CLE seminars each fourm Fridoy of the month. Jordan, Justice Osc.ir Adams of tbc Alnbama Supreme The 1,620 members of the Birmingham Bar look forward Court and Jolu, Wilkerson, Clerk of the Alabama Court of co seeing you in Bim1ingha.mar the Annual Meeting of the Civil Appeals. Srate Bar.

Calhoun County The Calhoun County Bor As.~atioo hdd its first mecting of 19!3 on Thursday, J:anuary13, 1983, Thi, organizacion:tlmccring was held at the Calhoun O,u nty coui:tbousc. The members of the Assocfation expressed their apprcciation to Judge Robert M. Parkr through a n:solurioo citing him for his nWly accomplishmmts during his 18year tenure on the lxnch . l'iaurcd Ul dl< Hou, . Officca for die coming year wcrc clem,d. 11,osc ,on CountyLaw Libn,y assuming leadership roles in die local Bar &sociation arc: arc (L to R) S,m Adilll1S, vice pr-csldcnt or rhc Richard H. Cater-President Houston Counry 8~, Willi:un H. Jackson-Vice President - As.s.ociadon; R.hond:i Gr.utt A. Puis----Scacwy Wc>doo, C'OIIIU)'uw fi. WIiford J. L:,nc,-T rcasurer brui:211: and Ernie Hornsby, prc11d,n1of -s 11/m1intdbf Gor411F . Bniley,]r. 1hc locol bar. A source of much pride by the Bar Association is the law Letters tO Judge Moore from U.S. Rep. Jack Edwards library maintained in the Houston County Courthouse . and U.S. Sen. Howell Heflin were read by James J. Duffy, 1lucough the dedicated efforn of Presiding Circuit J udgc Jr. , presidenr of tl1e Mobile Bar Association, and Mayor Jerry White , the library has been upgraded to the point Gary Greenough proclain1ed January 17th John L. Moore that it is heavily used and relied upon by Houston County Day. lawyers. A much needed librarian has alsobeen employed. When ask~-dhow it felt to retire, Judge Moore quipped , "l'm too old to cry and a litt le too young for it not co -r, ,/»nitted byErnest H. Hornsby hun." A reception honoring Judge Moore was held in the Mobile Bar Association Headquarters immediarcly following the ceremony. More than tluee hundred family members, friends, cotUlty and city officials and otl1er dignitaries came to express their good wishes upon his retirement and express their appreciation for his years of dedicated service to tl1e citizens of Mobile.

--,,JJ ,nitttd II] Barbara RJJOda Montgomery County The Montgomery Cotmry Bar Association held ics Annual Meeting January 19, 1983, at tl1e Whitley Hotel. There were approximately 170 members of our association present. The guesr speaker was Wa.llacc D. Riley, president-elect of the American Bar Association. Also in attendance was Norborne Stone, president of tl1e Alabama State Bar, and Bill Hairsron , president-elect of tl1e Alabama Stare Bar. TI1e American Bar Association 50-ye'11'Award was JamesJ . Duff)•,Jr ., presidentof'thc Mobile BarA '>S()Cl:uion} presided when presented to Mr. T. B. Hill, Jr. rfflrcmcntccrcmo nic:sw ere held for the HonornbleJohn 1 ... MOOf"C (scaccd far TI1e following officers and directors were elected to serve left}, ProbateJ udge of Mobile Councy. for the year 1983: Mobile County Eucl A. Screws, J r.-President Henry C. Chappell, Jr.-Vice President 11,c Mobile Bar Association held irs annual Cb.ristmas James R. Seale-Scc retary/I'rcasurer monthly meeting December 17, 1982,,Members enjoyed David B. Byrne, Jr.-D irecror eggnog prior co the luncheon and used dlis time tO visit Wanda D. Devcrcallx-Director and c.ttend good wishes of the season. George H. B. Matl1ews-D irector Past presidents of tl1e MBA were honored . Twenry-onc of twenty-eight living past presidents we.re in attendance. - mbmitted by Gloria IVaita Also recognized for their assistance to d1e members of tl1e MBA were the clerks of tile Circuit, District and Probate Courts and the Register of Chancery. At the close of chis, the final meeting in 1982-,Mylan R. Engel, 1982pres ident, presented tile gavel to James J. Dllffy, Jr., incoming president for 1983. The entire assembly gave Mr. Engel a standing ovation in recognition of an ourscanding year of leadcrsltip. Open House at tl1c new MBA Headquart ers was held December 21. Guests cour~-dthe new facility between the hours of ten and four and enjoyed eggnog and "goodies" provided by the Auxiliary. The 127-ycar-old Le Vert Office was the perfect setting for the friendly gathering of lawyers, their families, friends and office staff to celebrate the Holiday Season and exrend to each otl1cr good wishes for the New Ycar. Retirement Ceremonies were held for the Honorable T. B. Hill, Jr.• a parmccin rhcfim1 HlU , Hill. Garter, Franco, Co1c& Black, Jolin L. Moore , Probate Judge of Mobile ColU1ryfrom acceptsthe Amcricu, J3arAs:sociation Fifty Y earAward a t the:Montgomery 1963-1983, on Thursday , January 13, 1983,in the Probate Cowny BarAssoci;uion Annual Mccti.og in JMu:t.ey. Pr('scoti.ngthe awatdis Courtroom where he was sworn in 19 years ago. 1\tion[gomcrylawyer Jcx:Espy.

The Alnlm,,,n.J..awyer 79 Mary Lyn Pike CLE -11 and Se1ninars

MCLENEWS CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION OPPORTUNITIES &porting of CLE Credits: 1982 March 1-May 31, 1983 The review of approximately seven tho usand individual rcpom of com· To rcgisrcr for any of these seminars , contart the sponsoring organization rather pliru1ce with the CLE requiremen t has than the MCLE Conunission office. been an eye-straining and eye-opening Sponsor Code Sponsor Name Teleph one cask for th is auth or. Ideas for improve­ Numbe r ment in the design of the reporting fom1 ABANl Amcricru1 Bar Association Nationa l Institutes have developed.. Add itionally , several (3u) 567-4675 ABICLE Alaooma .BarInstitute for Continuing suggest ions for individu als completing Legal Education (205) 348-6230 the form have come to mind . Por exam· ADTR t\la bama Department of Industri al Relation s (205) 837.-5040 pie, it is suggested that infom1ation re· ALI-ABA American Law lnstimte- ported in 1983 be typed rather than Amcrican Bar Association (zis) 2+3-1630 handwritten , in orde r to ensure lcgib il· AtBA Atlanta .Bar Associarion (+o+ ) 5:or-07S1 ity. Note alsothat there is no sponsoring ClCLE Cumberland lnstinm: for o rgani,.atio n named "CLE." Attorneys Continuing Legal Education (205) 870-2865 have used this name tO refer to such o r· ORI Defense Rcseard1 Institute (414) 27:0-5995 ganizations as the Bim1ingham Bar As· GWU George Washington University sociatio n, the Mobile Bar Association, Natio11alLaw O:ntcr (202) 676-6815 and the Alabruna Bar lnstin ,te for Con · NCDA Natio nal College of Disaict Attorney. (713) 7+!>-1.571 cinuing Legal Education. lt is unneccs· NlTA Natio11allnstinuc for Trial Advocacy (919) S)62-851S sary to list the particular room in which PU Practising Law lnstitu tc ('1.12)765-5700 an activiry was conducted; iris sufficient PRG Patent Resourc es Group , Inc. (202) 223-a7s to nrunc d1c ciry. Filing copies of pro· TOLS Tulane University Law Schoo l (so+)86s·S939 gram brochur es, in anticipation of re­ porting the credits earned, will assist in SCHEDULE QF SEMINARS the making of comp lete and accurate re· Dates Names and Places ports. Mardi 1, 1983 Binninghan1-.'l1'f!idi,i.gLcgtrl Malprnaice. lt is nor necessaryt o wait ,mtil De­ ABICLE, Credits: 3.9. cember of each year ro a1Tci1dse minars March 2, 1983 Mourgomery-Avoiding LegalMalpnraice. and submir the reporting fonn . Such ABICL'E. Grcd,ts: 3.9. dcla)"' may result in inacatrate, yet in· March 3, 19.83 Andal~ ia-.'lmtiii ,ig ugnl Mn/practice.AB1CL E. tcrcsting , reporting. For example, one Cred ,ts: 3.9. individual reported attending a seminar March 4, 1983 Mobilc--,,twidi .,ig Legrll Mlllpmaice. ABICLE. entitled "Marital Relations.'' To date, no Cr,cd,rs: 3.9. .Birmingham-Fedeml Praaiu. ABlCLE. Credits : sponsor of CLE activities has scheduled 7.2. such a seminar. One individual in a hurry March 9, 1983 .Bim1ingham-Ba11ki,w Law. ABlCLE. Credits: designated a new legal malpractice spc· 6.6. cialist for the Bar: " Dukenord Linger· March ,1-12, 1983 San Prancisco-J,fedim/ Mnlpraaice. DRI. stem.» According ro rl1c Executive Sccre· March tt-1-1-, 1983 Wasb_ingto n, D.C .-Go1tmm1cnt Omrr11aClnims. rary of the Bar, the Bar Association's GWU. Credits: 20.7. malpractice speci alist remains Duke March 16-18, 1983 N:cwOr leans-A dmiralty Law ln.rti1111te. TULS. Nordlinger Stern. March ,7-18, 1983 Atlanrn-Co,,s11mcr Credit. PU. Marth 18-19, 1983 New Orlcans-Adv1111ctdMed icatMalpraetiu. PLI. MCLE &g11.Jatio11s:1983 A mmd111e11ts Mard1 19, 1983 Binni11ghan1-F ederlll.ll ules of Civil Prpcedrm:. Credits: At its meeting on December ,o, 1982, CTCLE. 3. the Board of Bar Commissione rs Mardl 20-24, J983 Beonuda-Cm11pa,·aeiveLaw. ABICLE. R.cg· Mard i 2-1--25,1983 NcwOrlcans-C11,-rn1rJ)ei11J/op111entsinB1111kn,ptcy adopted several ru11e,1dmems ro the 1111d&r»lfro1izati01.s . PU . ulatio ns for Mand atory Co nt inu ing

So Ma.rd,, gt; Alabrunaruid in any other stare. Twelve March 25, 198i Bimlingham-New ProbateCode. ABICLE. hours of CLE credit will beawarded for Credits: 7.2. the preparation and grading of one or Binningham-Trin/ Ad1,oc11cy. CICLE. more bar e.xarninationquestion s during Los Ange!es-SeemiriesL11.w for Nomectq-ities Lllwym. ALI-ABA. a given year. April 1, 198; Binninghrun-So11r/Je11.rtm1Trial I,,mmte. R.eg11lamn,3 .9. Credit may be earned ABICLE. d,rough fonnal cnroUmenr and educa· April (n, 198; Bim1ingham-Werkmm's On11pimsat:i;m.ADIR. tion of a postgraduate nature, either for Credits: 10.2. credit or by audit, in an accredited law April 6-9, 198; Reno-P11blie Ci1>ilLaiv Problems.NCDA. school. One CLE credit may be claimed April 7, 198; Huntsville:-,,Jge, Rau a,ul S,:xDiscriminatum. for each hour of class attendance. ABICLE. Rcg11/atiat,4- 1.ro.11,is regulation has April 7·8, 1983 New York-Tax F..w:mptFi1111mi11g. PLI. been runended to the effecrthat program April 8, 198; Birmingham-Age , Race and SexDiscrimination. sponsors arc no longer required to sub· ABICLE. mit copies of evaluation questionnaires April 14, 1983 Mobile-,dne, Rau a11dSex Disc,imination. completed by particip3llts w,lcss specif­ ABICLE: ically requested- to do so by the MCLE April 1+-16, 1983 Las V cgas-B1

•• Birmingh:un Bar Association National JudicialCo llege Commercial Law League of Amcria National lnstinuc for Trial Advocacy Fund for Public Education National Organi:r.ation of SocialSecurity ~xecutive O,mberland lnstirurc for Continuing Clainr.mwReprc:scnrorivcs Legal Education National Rural Electric CoopccarivcAs· <.l)irector 's DefenseResearch lnstirutc sociarion (legal programso nly) Federal Bnr Association Patent Resources Group, Inc. Fcdcr:11 Publications, Inc. Pr:1ctisiog Law lt1Stirurc ~port H~tsvillc ·MadisonCouuty BnrAssocl · Professional Education Systems, Inc. auon (Alabama programs only) lnccmarional Association or lnsurnnce RockvMounrai11 Mineral Law Founda­ Counsel tioll in mostjurisdictions where there is on lman•tion'11 Society of Bani.ncrs Soudicastan Bankruptcy Law Institute, integrated bar-and they exist m 31 Legal$CC1ions, agmcy progr:un-U .S. Inc. jurisdictions. Our role in mcc go,·cm· ind state governments Soudiem Federal Tax Institute, Inc. mcnr is not• unique one. The Califomi> Library of Congn:s,..._Lcgislari,•cS.:r· Southwesrem LcgtllFowidation Stare Bar is much like ours in irs org;ini- vicie Trial Lawyers Association or Madison 7Ation.A fom,cr president of thar group Maririmc Law Association County once said the California Bnr wns a Mobile Omnty Bar Association R.eg,dntio,i 4-S· Anyo rgnniz.1tionnot l•n1ug•,vu1np" bar. Ir.s" n1ug" ,v;1si n the Montgomery County Sar Association included in Regulation +.2, desiring •p· lcgislttturc and its "ww11p" was in the Motor C1rrier Lawyers Association proval of a cours<:, progrnm, or other Supreme Court. [f you're tired of the National Bar Association activity, will apply to the Commission by bbcls of Dcmoc:rar,R epublican or other Notional Collegeof District Anomcys sub mitting the required application known political entities, remember you National College of Juvenile Justice form and supporung documentation at could d:aim co be a "mug•wump.ft National District AttorneysAssociation lease30 daysprior to the date for which National Health lawyers Association the com:sc or program is scheduled. D Reginald T. H.mmcr

Still Waters . We're Mud! More Than Challenging Golf!

II you're.,. dllppc,- or a puue.t, Stll WAICl'Jc,in orlc-ryou )C)rnC ot lhc most ch.\lk'ngln..lt golf Around, Our gotf p,MkagclndudeS a prlv,,tc 1wo,bcdroom viflJIove rlooking our WOO(II.Ands.unGmi 1ed green fetJo, golf C-Art(2 petJons/18 hoff!:i),MCI l,,kAkf.u-1 •nd dinner at ow f'C:1itaUJan1and loungr. 1'hc!rox u Deft. Dutwe 're-no1tuSt a golf resort Wc'rtt 1oc:.-1c<1on bt~uttful 40,000 .A(flfl Nomc..------LAlt M.vtinwlth $0CM' of the bHt r,Ht,w.ue, 11$hk'lgIn thr Sourh.We Address.------~ • ful-servlcc fflildn.L• ~ CMlrrM\A,both twd .anddly rcrril Ciry______., ,me __ _ ..c.,J~ --- (OUJts MM1mott lb.In ) ,000 ( ) Vocunon Renllll ) Homesites $19 w.uers..TOW rdax.tidonMd ei-io)o,,,c.ot. nw ·s whu •--c«-twff b , ·- Fu mo1t WOffl\fJtonulJ or write ( I Golf Pllduge ) Condominiunu Sdl W•1$ on UM Mantn I ) Tennis Pack3ie ) T,mcshurcing 1000 Stil WAltfl 0twe o.d ...... Al.A 36853 ) Conve ntions (l0S)8l5 ,7687 (In AUIIMmA) l ,800,6ll ·49S4 (Mllonwldc) 'C.011J)AClwSe> $tAl't oll 165 pet day !)el pen.onIMWd OC'IfO\lr•p.etSOn OCC\ll'Ml'IC)' Of • two•llf

J. Thomas King, Jr. President

Th e third Executive Committee Meeting of the Young President Jim Lloyd advises that the tentatively scl1edulcd Lawyers' Section of the Alabama State Bar was held at the dates for YLSevening social meetings during 1983are March Stafford Inn in Tuscaloosa on February 12, 1983. The meeting 31, May r:,.,July 21 (during the Alabama State Bar Meeting in was well-attendedand proved to be quite successful. Bim1ingham), September 8, and October 27. The Annual TI1cSaturday conference was preceded on Friday evening Meeting and Chcistmas Party will be held on December ll, with a socialevent, wh.ichwas hosr,-dby Claire Blackand Ron 1983. The Binningham Young Lawyers wish to especiallyin· Davis. ln addition, Claire ,ind Ron made arrangements for vite young lawyers from around the State to join them for the chose interested ExecutiveCommittee members to attend the social function planned during the AlabamaBar Convention. Alabama-Georgia basketba.11game on Saturday afternoon. The weekendcan be capsuled by stating that everyone had an enjoyable time, and much was accomplished. The Montgomery YLS recentlyheld electionsfor Officers Plans are well under way for die Young Lawyers' Annual and Directors to se,"e during the coming year. TI1oscchosen Seminar, whicl1 will be held at Sandestin during the weekend to serve are as follows: of May 13-14, 19S3. Caine O'Rear, Ill, and his committee are Presidem- TI1omasR. DeBray arranging another interesting progran1. More specific details Vice President- Pamela Gooden Hope will be forthcoming. Secrctarylfrcasurcr- Jaroes H. Anderson TI1e Binningham Young Lawyers elected Officers and Directors: ExecutiveCommittee Members for 19S3 at the Annual Meet· Wade Hope ing and Ou:istmas Party held on December 16, 1982. TI1esc Willian, R. Blwchard newly elected officeholders arc as follows: Susan Bevill President-James S. Lloyd Wanda Devereaux­ First Vice Prcsidcnt-0.rol Ann Smith lllllnediare Past President Second Vice-President-James H. "Popsic" Miller Sccrerary-Berc P. Taylor Trcasurcr-B. Booz.crDowns , Jr. TIJeAlabama Lawyer provides the best means available to Assistant Treasurer-Rowena Crocker disseminate information concerning re-centor planned ac· Executive Committee: tivities of local YLS groups around the State, as well as Robert M. Girardeau Lee Benron noteworthy accomplishmentsor activitiesof individualyoung Jasper P. Juliano S. Shay San1ples lawyers.I want ro cncou.i:ageall young lawyersro report any Stephen A. Rowe John W. Haley pertinent news ro the 01air of the Young Lawyers' Alabama Julia Smcds J. Gary Pare State Bar lnformation Committee, Stephen E. Brown, 1400 H. Thomas Wells, Jr. Robert A. Jones, Jr. Park Place Tower, Birmingham,Alabama , 35203, for publica· Jud)' Whalen tion in The Alabama Lawyer. judge. with the exception rh:u a 1udg­ Bankruptcy mc11tof the district court is filed in ae· confana: with Ruic 921 of the B•nk• ruptcy Rules. Practice Befort: proceeding wit!, an cxpbn•· rion ofrhc Rule, it is impon:mcto und,·r­ s1andthe dillcrcncc between " related" Under and "T itle 11" proceedings •sthese tcnm will be used in this nrtide. The Ruic usesno tern, to conmist the pro­ the ''Rule'' ceedings ailed "Title 1 I " or "rclJtcd procc:cdings." I rc:conuncnda reading of Ruic ( d) (3) counderstand die difference Wilbur G. Silbcnnan between the two cypcs,but ;as examples to disrmguish the two: a Complaint For RclicfFromAucomaticSr.1y1s"Tirlc1 1" while one for BreachOfCo,uract where Wilbur G. Silbm11n11, n pnm1c,-i11tllf no claim Ins been filed against rhc c.~rate, Bir,ningbnm ln111fi n11of Gordo11, Silber­ is urclnrcd.,, mm,, Lctb, Clt1•tln11d & Gqn/q11,PA., An)' bankruptcy marrcr pending on rtaivtd bor/J/Jis 1111dtrgrnd11ate and Ian• December 25, 1982 is d,,,:mcd referred degne:sfrvm11,r Uni,•[ i!Jflbama. Ht to the bankruptcy judge befon: whom it bas bem a amrrilmtor to The Alnb mnn was pending. AUntw of wh•rcvcr Lawyer in tbr past. = nantrt: arising under Tit.le 11 or rcbtccl to ca.sesunder Title I 1, arc rcfcrtcd to Lhe bankruptcy judges of tl1c district Aulawyers now should be awar., Prior ro October .J, 1!/82, the Judicial CQllrt. However, this reference 1113)' be tlm on the 28th day of June 1982, the Conference of the United Scares ( Sec 28 withdrawn by the district court 01 ru1y Onitcd Stntcs Supreme Qm rr dccrct.-d USC §33 1) issu.. -d a pnpcr discussing dine on itS o,vn 111ocion or upon a mo· thar the Bankru ptcy Reform Act of Nortl,em Piprli11e, stating rt'aSOnsfo r ics tion timely filed by one of the panics to l 978, generally effective October l , opposition ro giving Article ITl starus 10 die proceedings. No approval of the 1!179, w,,s unconsrirution:tl. Norrhm, bankruptcy judges, nnd proposing re· district coun is required co transfer= Piptli11t Co11struaio11Compan1 ,. medial legisl•tion. Luer it recom ­ in put or in whole between bankruptcy M11m1//011 Pipptother v:tlid means of adjudica­ Coun Judge. All papets in casesor pro­ rupn:y judge arc s.,c fonh in Section (d) tion, wid10ut.irnpairing meinterim ad­ ceedings rt:bcing to bankruptcy under of cl1cRuic . Bankruptcy judges ar., au­ minismn:ion of the bankruptcy bws." Tttlc 11 of tl1 which may not be pecfonned is 10 be given and whether it can be district judge. However, with regard to by a bankruprcy judge will be transferred revoked by dthcr party. lf diere is such related mam:r,, dd1ncd under Section ro a district judge. The Rule does not set consent, oppnrem.ly the ruling becomes a (d) (3), die district court shall rc1~ew the forth whcd1er any motion is necessaryto final judgment or dispositivc order. proposed order or judgment whether or effect rhc mu1sli:r, bur ir would appear Under Section (cl (41 it is the burden nor any pan:y appeal~or applies for leave that the bankrnptcy judge should sua of the parties to raise tbc issue of whether to appcol. If the bankruptcy judge cer­ spontc order the transfer. any proceeding is • ~related proceeding" tifies that circumstances require ap­ As contrasted with d1c 1978 Aa:, rhc priono d1c1imcofthc entry oftbeordct proval by the disaict judge, whether or bmkrupccy judge, under die Ruic, has or judgment of the dirnia judge after nor there w.u any conrcs., die review is no power to conduct a jury trial, proba­ review. Then: is a question i:hcn as to automatic. The same is true as to a pro­ bly bcallSC1.his is considered • judirul whether there is any burden on tbc par­ posedonkr or judgment of a "rcLated duty only 10 be exercisedby an Article m ties ro raise misissue before:die bmk­ proceeding," requiring an Article JU judge. An unanswered question is ruprcy judge. !fit is not raised before the judge, unless then: be consent of me whether a rcquc5t for a jury trial au­ bankruptcy judge, and die bankruptcy parties. The bankruptcy judge is, in cf. tomatic,lly causes a tcformcc ro the dis­ judge trc•ts it as a "Title I t" matter, with feet, acting as • Special Masret in the trict court judge, or whether the bank­ an entry by the bankniptcy court clerk ~rclatcd procccdlng.» ruptcy judge has discretion to deny the under Section (d) (2), is this tantamount There also is provision under Section rcquesr, thereby preventing the transfer too consent dint this order is final? If the (c) (3) rhat the bankruptcy judge may co the discrict co,111.I t is not known bankruptcy judge may not corer a judg­ certify thnr circumstances require in1- whcrhcr rhis 11r.1~considered by the Judi­ ment or disposirive order in a "related mcdiatc review by the district judge of a cial Conference. pr()C(lCding"widiour consent, wlm is martcr directly orising w1dcr Tide 11, Except for "rcbred proceedings,» the die result when such an order is rotcred and in such circumnanccs, 2 disrrict orders and judgmmrs of the bankrupocy withour conscnc and no appeal or appli­ judge is to review d1cmancr and enter an judges an: clfc.-crivcupon mtty by the cation istaken wirlun the ten day period? order or judgmmr :,s ~n :is possible. clerk of the bankruptcy tOutt, uni= Is that order indfccth·c as bcingconu.uy Section (I) provides that in proceed­ thett is a my . Tiic stay may bc cnrcn:d ro Section {dl (3) (Bl or the Ruic? Also, ings before die b;ankruprcy judge, the b)• me bankruptcy judge or by the dis­ whor is the effect of the parties at the localbankruptcy rules apply and in pro­ trict judge. This practice:is similar ro ,:he dimict court level raising die question of ceedings before the district court rhc prcs.:nr Bankruptcy Rule 805 as to ap­ whether the proc:ccdingis a ~rdarcd pro­ district coun rules apply. Section (c) ( I) peals. cccdingr makes rcfcreno: to the Interim Bank­ Pinal orders and judgments of the Section (c) (2) {B) provides that in n1p1cyRuic$. I f the district court has 001 bankru1ncy judge arc subject to review conducting the review, the disrrict court adopted these I nrcrim Rules, then ir by rhc districr court, which is initiated by may hold a hearing ,md may receivesud1 would be bencr practice tbat it do soar notice of oppc:olti led within ten days of evidence as is appropriate aod may ac· this rime. rhc dare of rhc entry of d1c judgmcnr or ccpc, rcjecror modify in whole or in part Section (g) provides thnt bankruptcy order. 111c Ruic pt1Jl'idest hat, excepr as the order or judgment of die bankruptcy courn and bankruptcy procedure shall modified by Section (c) {2{A)and (bl, judge, and nC(.'nkNrcry 1udgc. ruptcy cou1Tsystem is unconstin,rionnJ. proc«di ng i,, bcfof"t• tt:u,lcmpccyJudg e-or~ ;udgc fJI (c:) Dt,trl(t c:oun:llo'icw Apparcody the Supreme CoulT do.:s not tht' Jktna c-oun,ex«pt du.t a Judgn,tnt by the duukt ( I) A nou«oi appc;alfn,cn If M onk:rorp:l gmmr. 0<~ordaociudlp.- n( 1""'*"""'1p,dg< 0< accept this view :asii w:is aware of the 1ud&•"Jul l'< fiW U1"""°""" ,...i, a..Jc 92 I of ,he tn app1ecar,no~lu\'c'ft)~,9' ~ordn' Rule when it rtjcctro the ~ucst for a a..1.nsp (cl (li (A) md (B) of dm ndt . dw vodt-, Title 11 UC: ttftrml COthe b.tnltuptq' ji,dp of chaos in d,c bankruptcy courcs. Articles ...... "' "'1h ., p., VIU ol lh< 1...... ,. have appc:uro in various newspapers, "'" dmna . llub '1"'1U>'l'!"JltofbwNl"')',udfp"iud­ (J) Th< """""" IO I ~ ffllf l'< fl'dll' and otdcn and the proccdum r,n forth m 1Janltvptcy especiallythe WallS1-rccr Journal , quot· wtdldr,ta.•nby dK d111riaroun .u 1nyumir on su, own lnicrun ltuk 8004 apply to :applte:lbc;,nro, k;r,VI'to nwdon or on dmclt n,~ion by• p.,.ny. A motion rc,r ing authorities in the field on the confi.,. ~ppc.al 1.rucrl()('Utory o«kn or l»nkruprcy J\Mtgcs.. wnhdr-..1W21of rcf(rcn" ,h.ul oot my o.nyhli:tktuptty sioo resulting from d1cNorthm1 lh< - p,dgc b>Alo.rupuy T'ipc/1,u numr pa,d,og belo«, bonbupcy judp: imlcss• •r<• Modif-oon by or lhc decision. Senator Howcll Heflin, formcr audll'ot..... ro.~osr...... i1>r1tu1coo2oflhc dfit.,., 1s...... ii.,'"' - - tr,"""-" 11,nlNpuy llub. -1mdn-lro.she d:l.tlrinmun. ffl')' ttLllll ehccnbN: ffllll · Olicf Justice of the Alabama Supreme (2) (A) A druric:t.iudgr ,h£11mi~ ttr , rnaytd'tt pm o( tlk-rmncr 1-ik to lht': Nnkrupccy (1) .1:n(l('Ckr or judgmrnt C'l1t('r(dunde r Court, tllld one of die leading members j\idgc.,m m.ayicl(r d'C crulrc m.uur b.11,k10 1hc b:111k• pmgr,ph (d) ( •I ,r. umcly oocl« a( rupt1,')'fudge with outrul.'docuap«lfying the powcn of the Senate) udicbl Comminoc, is well it~ hu brffl filedot d ~ amdy ap­ aw:tn: of 1hc situation ond is working and r-..... ""' dw boabup,oknif'"YfUdga nuy pcmnnm .-d" ln L'OOductingttvi~'.tbcdmntt 1U!Jge:mly the public interest. Lt remains for Con· (i) nOI eommittcd lo ,he bonbuptcy hold a hwlng M\dm:ay tCC'Clvr- t«h cvldcna:a, "l,pt0-­ grcss to enact legislationto comply with 1UIIS" xru.al prac:n..co or priac ,nd ""f ""I"-"""·o< modify...... t,olr or"' (ii) ..-.amncang-a prnittu,cm orimpmoat- the ltlffldatc of N111'11Jm1Pipdi11t. 0 I""- dw - "' pllfg,mMol d,c bmb\of"ttdproceeding ..,d Nies jn mp«l 10 d,c , .. honl)' oCdw bonJuup«y d,c buwup<- ...... do: ocmn. doootvdai:Se:~wl•w edmamnClQ6- - """' - 'l'PY· The JUdguolohc dn.o~ «ffllng me adnumMnnonot die note; ~a.rn °' (g) llfflkruplcy Rulca '"d TIil< IV of l'ubll< 1.,,. cimumtanco c.ust. Thck Cffl'Urmunco ine.lude:( 1l and objcttionao .;b.ltm1piruc ~O'fllt', cowundairn, 9H98 the t.mllltidpatc.d unconM.ilulionaLityor the P"' or by 1hc:amtt. ln Wh?k\'<:t 1mo1.unog1ln;:1 ptNc)ns fJUng Col.lffl or t»tiktuptty ,nd proccdutt in hankmprq· pc,;t."'<:rti\ b;mluuptcyjudgu In IIC4110n 2'4I ( a) or Vubltc d.ltn. .ag.unwthe o.-...:c; «ckn m l'df'«' 10 obwning .th.allcoounuc to bC"go1,-ocmcJ l"1 Tnk tv of ruhl.tt1.¥. · '-"" 9S-S98- (2) lh< c1c,t ,....,. ol <; on1'"' tp<­ cud~ co Kl _. t-4ei,uw aed ~ wo­ sc,;b(d by ohc S<1pm and Pmdlng Cua bonkNpl

.\f11,rh 1«') GJlook Alabama Law ~view of Damages By Robert L. Potts Charles W. Gamble and Donald E. Corley The Harrison Company Norcross, Georgia 1982. Pp. 463

Q ne positiveaspect of the lawyere.xplosio n in Alabamai s easy and quick referencefor d1e busy practitioner, and me that it is oow apparently economically prudent for Jaw citations to Alabama eases and statutes contained in the publishers to print books directed solely to Alabama attor· foomorcs arc of inestimable valuein researchinga particular neys. With d,cir 1982 rreatisc oo the Alabama law of dam­ damage or remedy issue. ages, Deam Corley and Gamble have joined a number of If me treatise can be criticised in any manner, it is only other Alabama lawyers who have recently published diat by attempting to make the book State the present monographs on Alabama Jaw. Alabama law, in a concise, yet comprd1ensive and or­ "Damages» have been defined as "pecuniary compensa­ ganired form, the authors have neglected, with a few nota· tion or indemnity, which may be reooveredin the courrs by ble exceptions,to discuss dlc reason or spirit of d,c damage any pc[S(>nwho has suffered loss, detriment, or injury, principles, with appropriate criticism of unreasonable or whcd1er co his person, property, or rights, through tl1e inappropriate damage rules. As Blackstone taught many unlawful act or omission or negligence of another." 111e yearsago in his lccrurcs ar Oxford, "the mosr universaland wotd "damage" is taken from the Latin word udamnum" effccrual way of discovering the true meaning of a law, \vhich is derivedfrom t he verb« dcn10."'"Demo» means «ro when the words are dubious, is by considering tl,e reason take away," indicatesa speciesofloss and signifiest he thing and spirit of it; or the cause whicli moved die legislaror to taken awayor the lost item which a party is entitled to have enact it. For when this reason ceases, tl1e law, itself, ought restored ro him so thar he might be made again whole. like,vise to cease wid1 it,,, Wid, tliis book on tl1is imponaot subject, Mr. Gamble However, even dle aumors' consciouseffort to avoid any and Mr. Corley have restored tlie focus tliat diis subject judgmental analysis of the rules, which is evident through­ deserves in Alabama. 'Iliey have done an admirable job in out mosr of die treatise, yielded ro a greater need in their comprehensivelydiscussing t he Alabamacases and starutes discussionof damagesfor wrongfuldeat h! TI1ein defensible relating to this important, d,ough frequently neglected, interpretation placed on dle 1872 Alabama Wrongful Dt-ath topic. Indeed, since the abolition of commoo-law pleading Act, whidi only allows punitive rather rhan compensatory in Alabama, mere is a growing tcndancy for lawyers to recovery, has continued to the ptcsent. The aumors' note forget the necessityof bodi knowing and atticnlating their that ''The Alabamaapp roach to wrongful death and puni­ claims to damages, which are inseparablytied to die doc­ tive damages is a departure from d1e rractitional purpose trine of remedies.The au1horsof this book have recognized intended co be served by the imposition of punitive dam· d1at fact and have done more dian simply discussd ie law of ages." They have properly soundly condemned d1ep resem damages. They have comprehensivelyr eseard1ed and ar­ ntle. tin 1lated the civil remedies available in Alabama, and in so In conclusion, Alabama La111of Damages is a must for doing, have, by necc~sity, discussed much substantive Ala· every lawyer's library in Alabama. 'Di.iswork goes far to­ ban1acivi l law. ward filling an ioiportanr gap io an are.a of law d,ar is Further, by directing this work solely toward Alabama neglected not oaly by law sd,ools and bar examiners,but to practice, they have covered in an all-inclusivemanner vari• some extent is ignored by practitioners. Deans Corley and ous areasof srate law that have recentlyd 1aogcd,sud1 as the Gamblehave done me lawyersof d1issra te a great service by products liability field, wim itS recent Alaban,a Extended meir yt-oman'seffo rt in compiling this treatise. Manufacturers Liability Docrrine, and die sovereign im· munity defense, which is no longer available in several types of cases. Rohm L. l'otts, Ye11iewerof..A l11bn11 ,n I.Aw TI,e law of damages can be categorized in many ways. of Dtu11119esis a pramcing att-orney in /:UJrttJceand a pamu:r in rhe law !inn of lndecd,B/ack'sLaw Diai1marylisrs thirty-four categoriesor P(Jr:t11 Yo11119& Blasi119a,ne. I-le 6m&01 1· types of damages. In this rreatisc, the authors have d1oscn t-rib1tttdfrcq 11t ntl1 to T/JtJAlaba,na to discuss, first, the various types of damages, generally Lan,)'ernnd is prt.sttJtly,/Jainnan _of tbe Alnlmma State 13nrB oard of Bar faam · without regard to the subject matter, and then, in the inen. second part of the book to examinet he law of damagesas it relates to particulars ubject areas.This format lends itself to

81 HOW MUCH INSURANCE IS ENOUGH?

Duke Nordlinger Sccro

Mr. Stm, srn,esIll risk 11urnngrr fl> t/Je A/abn,nn Start 811ri11 the nmu of dnims nnnl]1is,loss prrPtntwll , dnims rtpnir nnd insumnct (011n.stl.

ThequQrion of whnt limits of pro­ $300.000 , although gi\'cn the c:1tcgorics ticc have rdarivcly low cl:lim prob­ fessional liability insurnncc a given law of limits •v.ulJblc Imm most insurer.; abilities. firm should purchase is often asked of S500,000 \\'Ould probably have ro bc 11,c foregoing would seem co indiC1tc risk manngers, insurers, bro kers and purchas<.'n ote on d1e fim1's docket control en try for annual malpractice being considered cliarges defense costs the am ount available for all los.~ pay­ against limits, it cotdd be extremely im­ ments (and possibly defense expenses) coverage review prior to renewal thatthe portant ro purchase greater levels of during the policy year irrespective of the aggrega te limits should be increased coverage to avoid this problem. To fail number of claims. While it is possible prior ro pllrchasing che extended re­ to do so might result in ins,~'ficient (jm­ diat a sole practitioner could experience porting endorsemen t. However , exist· its for d1e total of both loss payments and several claims in one year, it is more ing aggregate limits may already be suf­ defense costs. likely that frequency will incrca.<;cwid 1 ficient if d1e endorsement is ro be pur­ T he law fim1 that ha.~exposure in the the number of attorneys in the firm. As a chased by only one insured in a firm that areas of practice with high defense cost result, the policy aggregate limit can be already has adequate dollar coverage for c.1pcriencc should also consider pur­ as critical a consideration as d,c per oc­ the multiple practitioners. chasing a policy whicl, pro,•idcs first currence limit. 111c aggregate linut is also an impor­ dollar defense by not applying the de­ The Unan swered Question ductible to such costs. If dus is not avail­ tant factor in an extended reporting en­ able, the firm should look for a policy dorsement purchase decision. While a TI,c question of what limits of profes­ few insurers have built in a limited an­ sional liability uisurance a given law fim1 nual increase factor to the endorsement should purchase has no single answer. aggregate limit or allow the insured to On ly by annually considering a nwn ber reinstate the aggregate annually, most of factors can the insured be rea.sonably OurLast NamePuts Us First carriersco nfine the aggregate limit to comfortable that it has adequate protec­ For Your Information Needs diat of the last practicing policy pur- no n. O

Cllators • Texts • Specialized Reference Books YourLo cal Shepard·s Sales Representative is: Steve Wells 3501 Granny White Pike Nashville, T N 39204 615·297-1355

--

" Your Safety-Policy covers falling off the scaffold all right, but not hitting the ground."

The Alnlm1J1nLnwyer

S1 3,000 modic;il expenses from borh St.1tePami policies. Srare Parm cvcnru· :illyagrccd ro pay die medial cxpcnscsif plaintiff would execute a subrogation agrccmcm designed to permit Scare Farm to r«over the expensesfrom Phil­ lips. In denying Smte Farm's eight to sub­ rogatc against its own insured, the Court rc:isoned dint if subrogation were :il­ lowcd under such circumstances, an in­ surer could pass the inddem of loss, either partially or rornlly, fi-om it.selfro irs own insured, thus, pcnnitting the in­ surer to avoid t'Ovcragcwhidi its insured had purdinscd.

John M. Milli119, Jr ., a. memberof 1J1e David B. B1"1t, Jr., a member oft/Jr Mo11190111rryl11wftn11 ofHill, Rill , Caner. Mo11tgomrryl11111 Jinn ofRDbis1m6,- Bclsrr, Frnnea, Q,/e & Bind:, r«m"tn IJis B.S. P.A., nuin:d bot/1l1is ,mdergmd,mu tfe. Int ervention . . . de9'" fiv,n Spnng Hill C«ltgc nnd JD . gru a11dJ .D . fivm 1J,rUnfrmiry of Ala­ den ial of motion of interv ene appeal:ib lc from rl1rU11irmir, ofAlabama. bama. Tlmulur , . Bnrtl,rr,

Bnn,,er Welden , In, . P. Mt/viii Mcdi c:iJ liab ility act • • • K11i,ghto>1, 17 A.BR449 (December l 7, l osurancc ... fraud d.oes not toll th e statut e of 1982). Alrhough the Suprcmc Court subrog;itio n ri~hts of insurer limitations declined co decide whcthcr a party is ag;iinst its own rnsured requircd ro object when evidence is of­ Hom v. Ciri:;nis HOfpirnl, er nl., 17 fered nt trial where the court has already Mod,,g 11. Srate Fnn11A11umwbile l11 - ABR 523 (Occcmbcr 30. 1982). In this grnnrcd thnr pArry's motion i11li mi11e nm111ceCo., 17 ABR 400 (December 10, case, n docror ldi: a portion of a needle in concerning thnr evidence, the Court, 1982). In• case offirst impression, die a patient. 111crc was evidence that the quoting nuchorities from other jurisdic­ Supreme Court stated that an insurnncc do..i:or concealed this fact from the p•· tions, admonishes that die safer practice company has no right ro subrogare ticnt and dint the four-year srnrucc of ro preserve error isro objca at trial when against lrs insured. Plaintiff was a pas· liniir:uions expired before suit. The Su­ die evidence is offered. Broad-based scnger in a vd,iclc driven by Phillips and preme Court held thar fr:tudulcor motion• which rcquitt rhe trial court co she was injurcd and incurred medical ex­ concealment of malpracticedocs not roU spccubte conc:emingeither die grounds pense$ in cxccs.sofs I ~.000. Pbintiff~ rhe operation of the four-year srarute of of objection or the puq,osc for which the insured bi• S1.1reFarm and had mcdic:::11 limitations in lhe Medical Liability An C\idcnce is offered may not be sufficient payments benefits in the amount of (Section 6,S,482, er seq .. Ala. Cotir to Prcsct\'e error if there is no objection $8,000. Sr•te Farm al50pro\ided liabil­ 1975 ). Tiie Court dedincd ro incorpo­ when die c,•idenee is offered at trial. ity and S5,000 mcdiCll!payments cover­ rate die principal of fraudulcm conceal­ In 1h1s= die evidence consisted of age under a separate policy issued co ment into the effecrsof §6-5...fSZ.supm, phorngrnphs which depicted post­ Phillips.The parncs settled for the limits by ingrafting §6-2·3 or §6-5-102. Aln. acddcnr modifications of a machine. In of the liability policy and a consent Codr 1975. granting the motion ;,, /imine, the trial judgment was entered. Th ereaf ter, The Supreme Court rracc-d the history court used o pair of scissors to cut off plointif'f dema11ded payment of her of the mcdkal malpraci:iccst atutes and

•• noted that the forerunner of §6-5- prcmc Coun cxpnndcd the craditionnl Appeal Bond ... 482(b), provided that actions for nuJ. scope of' the Writ of Error Coram Nobis a jurisdictional prerequisite pr.i<'ticc,were subjca to law$ rdanng to an rcvccsing the Court of Criminal Ap· B11rlmr:r,. Smtt, 17 /\BR 618 (De· the compuration of t1mc, i.e. §6-2-3, pea.lsand 111 perm,rring the defendant an ccmbcr 30, 19112).11iis case presents the supra. 1-lowever, when the Medical Lia­ out-of-time nppc:il. question of whether timely filing of an bility Act w;u enaacd in I 97~, the On June I L, 1979, me defendant was appc:,Ibond 1sa jurisdicnonal prcccqui­ lcgisl•rure specificallyadded • provision convicted of robbery and scnrenccd to sirc for appeal of a mlsdcmcanorconvic­ staring''that notwithsmnding any pmvi· chin:yyears imprisonment. I le fuilcd to tion m district court Justice Beatty, sions of such •ccrioos (i.e. §6.2.3, s11prtr) appc:,I bi~ conviction, bur on April 6, writing for• un:mimouscourt,hcld: No, no acrioo shallbe commencedmore than 1981 . fikd a l'cntion for Writ of Error and rcvct'S(.'(f:u,d remanded. four years after the aa, omission or fail­ Coram Nobis Ctlntcndiog thnr he w:is Buckner was convittcd in the District ure ,ornplainc:d of ... " 1l1c Su11rcme drnied his right of oppeal. The dcfcn· Coun of Shelby County of the mis­ Court recognv.cdthe lcgisLuiveintcm to cl.lm'spennon w35 based on the author· d=nor oficnsc of dri,~ng an o,·cc· limn medical malprncocc suits to four Icy of Dn11irlsv. A/11/mmn,48i F.2d 887 weight rnick. After the disrrkt court de­ years and found that the four-year limi­ ( 5th Cir. 1973 ), and asked ch,r the trinJ nied the defendant's morion for a new tations period was reasonable. court discharge him, granr him a new nial, Buckner filed a nrndy oolia: of trial or aflord him 1\11appeal. appcnl to die circuit court but ,lid nor Venue .•. The trinl court ordered a hearing and post nn appeal bond. ·meSrnre moved to rule 9(b), "fictitious parties" found mat the defendant desired to ap­ d~miss the appc:,I claiming that the de­ peal his conviction and infonmed his ap­ fendant faikd 10 perfect his appeal in Ex pane: Smiri, (Deese"· Dr. l-u S. accord an ce with § 12· 12· 70(b ), Aln. pointed counsel orhi~ desire 10 appc31. Smit/J), 17 ABR 408, (December 10, Through no fault of d1e defendant, •n O>dt 1975, because the notice of appeal 1982 ). Denying a paitioo for \\"nt of wa.snot accompanied by die appropriate appeal w.is never pcrfcettdand the time mandamus to require the trial 1udgc ro for appeal lnpscd. bond. rransfer a case from JcAcrson County to In reversing, the Supreme O>urt hcld Oilhoun County, the Supreme Court The Supreme Court through Ju.,ricc in pertinent part: held that Ruic 9(h ), A. R.CP ., "ficriri­ Maddo~ reviewed the traditional scope ~ ... We must conclude thst rhe in ous parties," s11bscquendy identified and of the writ of error comm nobis light filing of an appeal bond is 1101 n served by plaintiff should be oonsidcrcd of tbc Court of Criminal Appeals' cfu. jurisaicrion:il requirement for •p• by the roun in deciding venue. missal of the defendant'$ appc;il. Justice, peol of a misdccncanorconviction In this OS<\ Dr. Smith moved to Maddox observed: trom distrkt co circuit court , •• transfer the action co Calhoun County (f) he purpose of tl]C ~PP.Ca/bond was 'no t 10 confer 1unsdicoon on where he pr.iaiced and whccethe :i.Uegcd the circuit coun bu1 to enable the malpracticeocrurred. The comph1intde­ ''This Coun has cradirjonally dcfcndan1 to rdc:ise himsdf from scribed fictitious parries and plnintifT ruled thnt n wrir of error coram custody pending the appeal ... n nobis issues for correction of • (Emphasis ours.) subseq uendy amended to identify a jud~,cnt emcrcd in ignorance,of parry which would pccmit plaintiff to ccmin mnrrm offaa ,vhich if they rcm3ln in Jefferson County. Petitioner had been known to die courr rcn· citc-dn line of nuthorirics which held d1at dcring the judgment would not Pr ovidcncy determin ation venuc is decidedwhen suit ~ filed and have l>ccn entered.'' ( Emphasis dm subsequently nddrd parties cannot OUJ"S,) Ri,s,:dl ,. Srau, 17 ABR 635 (De=· be .xmsidcrcd. The Supreme Coul't dis­ bcr ~O. 1982). "The Supreme Court on rchc:iring was asked fO consider if the ringui•hed that line of authorities noting Justi<"CM3ddox ol>Stt\'cd dm the dcfcn· record of a guilty pica muse rcfka that dm Ruk 9(h) docs not add new p;mics. dant's p<'tition for wrir of error comm Ruic l>(h) merely mbstituta identified the defendant admitted having com­ nobis eonstimtc-d «cause" for rl,e Su· mitted eadi clement of the offcn$e ro parries for prc,-ious ticrlciousparties. premc Courcto reexamineia 1r:1dirional which he pied guilty. Chief Justice Tor­ application. bert, writing for a divided court, hcld In grnppling with the issue prcscnrcd, tlm a providcncy determ ination does Recent Decisions of the the Supreme Court rcrognizcd that the nor require an clement by clement ad­ Coun of Criminal Appe•l s had re· mission of gunr on the pan of the defen­ Supreme Court of pearedly held rhar the norion of an dant. Justice Torbert reasoned: Alabama-Criminal "ouc-of-t:imcappc:il" docs not exist in • ... The decisions of our courts indi· Alab:am.t.Goolsby •· Stntr, 374 So.2d c:ate the defendant muse be fully in· 929, (Ct. Crim, App. 1978). l::lowcvcr, fonmcdof nil the elements of the offense. Writ of error coram nob is ... the Supreme Court enunciated a (Citing cases). TI1is dllobdv. State , 24 Ala. recti011alComplex , 442 U.S. I , 99C S. t. impress ion , d1c Court was asked to con· App. 191, 132 So. 606 (Court of Ap· 2100 , 60 L.Ed .2d 668 ( 1979). TI1c Su­ sider whet her med ical payments under peals 193 1), Judge Barron cited orhcr preme Court it1 Gree11holtzhdd tliat • d1c Workmen's Compensation Act are stares' decisions defining what consti· stat utory provisio n rliar h<>lds out rhe subject to d1e o nc•ycar stature ofli mita­ rutes "physical control." mere possibility of paro le docs not create tions. Plaintiff was diagnosed as having 11,c Court of Crim inal Appeals out­ a "liberty interest" entitled to the pro ­ asbestosis approximate ly one year and lined rhc necessary elements to establish tection of due process. one month after his retirement Plaintiff that one is in "phys ical control" of a ve· Rely ing upon tlie authority of conceded that he was no longer entitled hide under the provisions of §32-5A· Grccnholtz and ]0'111.sto11,the Court of to disab ility compensation because his 191,Ala. Code 1975: Criminal Appeals fouad char the record did not suppo rt a findi ng d,ar d1e Paro le claim was not filed wid1in one year from "I. Active or constructive.possess ion his last da te of employment. He argued, of the vd1icle's ignition key by rhc Board acted in an arbitrary or capricious however, d1at the Workm en's Comp cn- perso n cliarged or , in die alternative , manner by denyit1g parole.

Tht Alnbrtmn Ltuvpr 9l GffarGffrief s

District court rejects exam Law Day effort which included or~1.ations or groups were nor challenge numerous programs and ,ctivitics eligible for the awardi however this across the srnte pl:111nedto foster year the award guidehnes have been On Wednesday, November 24-, gre>ter public tmdcrstanding of die broadened to include volunteers. 198z.. U.S. Dimkt Judge William place of· law in our lives. The scc-ondSp<:£fal nwnrd was Stalford of E'lorida rcjeaed Ar the December meeting of the presented ro the Office of rhc Staff argumcnrs by four blacks tha.t the Board of Commissioners in Judge Advocate, 1st Cnv:tlry Division, St:itc bar cxnminnrion discriminates. Monrgomcry, State B,r Prcsidcor Fort Hoo

Alabama wins prestigi ous law day awar d

The Amcric.u1Bar Association annually gives its prestigious Law Day Pub6c Service Award ro only two L:tw D3y programs in the nacion. n,c Alabama State Al,tnm, Smc 8,r l'rcsidcm Nornomc:C. Stone, Jr. (

Mnnh l9$J Other members of the thirteen Supreme court adopts two Quid AdvOCIC)'nnd Protcccion member board (and the examination new criminal rules; considers arutounccd on Januncy 19 rJ,nr grants marking the end of their term in amendments to district court of up to SJ,ooo an: now av.-,ila61cto office) arc David R. Botcl, help state and IOCIIbar associations Monrgomery (Feb. 19Ss ; Dclon:s R. rul es develop and implement programs Boyd, Montgomery (Pc . 1983)· chat would provide pro liot,ocourt Milton C. Dav~ Tuskegee (Fe~. The Alabanu Supreme Courron rcpn:scntarion of children in a range 194 ); Thomas I' . Gartli, Mobile January 3, 1983,approved Tttnporary of possible areas. eb. 198s); Ph_illip A. L.,iro, Jasper Rules 1$ and 16, Rules of Crimin:tl Through a grant from the !'cw eb. 198s)i Wmston V. 1,cgge, Jr., Procedure. These rules arc effective Memorial Trust, funds for the ~ thens (Jwy 1983); Alm C. March 1, 1983. Caucr's fifth annual competition for Libingsron, Dothan (Feb. 193+}; and Temporary_Ruic 15 provides for its Qtild Ad,-oc:icyBar Granr Richard H. SforzinL' Mobile (Feb. joindcr of offenses and defendants, Program will be av;iilabk to bar 198s). and allows such join.Ju for aial e'"a:i groups that dcmoll5U'atca c:apaciryto Bar cx:uninm an: responsible fol' \\~mour the con.sent of the defendant actually put inro place, with mefidl the pre~ adminisu:ltion and or defendants, in che abscncr of a cooecraooo of the local judiciary' a grading of the css:t)' portion of the showing of possibk prtjudicc. spcoal rourt-appoinuncnt pand (or lJabama Stat~ Bar Examination Temporary Ruic 16, dcalin_gwith •cccptablc altcmarivc) for assignmcn1 given in February and July of each pleading$ and motions, rcqwrcs that of trainttl oourucl or guardians nd year. ccmin ilcfcnscs be made by prc-trial /iron for children . morion. The rule also inaoduccs a According co Center Director provision by which \l p:my can Howard Davidson, "l'rogrnn1.1may l"C(\UCSt chat chc admissibifiryof any focuson court representation in one of his evidence be determined at a or more of the following areas: child pre-trial sn,gc just as if a morion to abuse or neglect, foi."TCI'care review, Negligence is costing suppress hail been filed by the termination of parental rights1 attorne y, courts , and st:lte opposing party. . . adoption, and the rcpccscnrnooo of unnec essary tin1e and expense The courtS advisory commmec on cliili!ren in domestic relations cases.• disrricr court procedure has However, he said preference wiU be Until J979, the Smc of Alnbama submirted for d1e Court's given co projects wlticl1 propose to refused to ncccplgw1is hmcnrs consideration certain amendments to make effective use of court•appoimcd against Sratc cmpfoyccs nnd ofricinls. the district court rules which would representatives of children to In Dmid Cil)' Hospitnl •- Eppmo11, 378 nllow third -parry practice in d1e facilitate tbe 11dqprifmof cbildm1 wir/1 :id the So. 6961 rhc court nulli!Tod district court. This third-party specialn «ds. State's position thereby clearing the practice would not apply to ClSCS on 11,c Center, a project of the AllA's way for gami~hmcncs ,.~ ro11tr11ct11r:o the small claims docKct. While an Young Lawyers Division, is a be l1onorcd. amend ment 10 R,~c 14-(dc), national source of rcchnical assi!rance At that time, rl,e Administrative A.R.Civ.P., would allow district on d1e legal aspccrs of child welfare, Office of O:>urcsJi.n conj'unction with court third-parry practice, an publishes over cwcnty booksa nd legal reprcsenmr,vesof 11e Finance nmcndmcnt co Rule Sz(dc) and ics monographs .and ~as previously Department and the Anom~ comments would limit u co supported thirty-rune state or looi.l Gmcral, developed a l'roccdure siniations ~when venue as co the bar association child advOC1cy which was widely puijliciu:d. Many third-party claim exists indcp,:ndcnrly projeas. . 1· b . . attorneys = not f.unilillrwith this of venue as to the main action." The deadline or Sil m1mng modusqpm,mli and, con~ucndy, The oommittec has also applications for the new grants is CQSt themselves, the courtS, and the recommended formal amendments co April 4, 1983. Requcscs foe the grant State much unnc=ry time and Rules 7(dc), u{dc), cS(dc), +1{dc}, ~ication package or a list of c:xpc:rue. l4(dc), :111d55{ dc), A.R.Civ.P., so as tcr publiarions should be The State asscneythe Supreme Qtild Ad'"lishedin the to file suit ag:ainstme Sratc due 10 Soudtcm ul advance sbcct,and any mcir own nC!tlig"')cc.• interested person will have until In a r=ntlJeanng in April 28, 1983,to exprc$$to the Momgomcry District Court. the Court any objections or other Speakers bureau brings State's posioon was upheld. rommcnts regarding the proposals. lawyers "out of the Attorneys who arc not familiar with woodwork'' this plan should contact the Sr.ire Compttnller who is cJ1cgamishrc for The Speakers Bureau of die all State employees with lhc ABA child advocacy program Birmingham Bar AS50Ciationhas exceptions of the Oepartmcnc of announces oew bar activatio n begun a conce1urared c,mpaign to Mental Hcalrlt, S1;11reDocks, n il grant competition make progr.uns on vanous issues institutions of higher learning, trade available co die ge11cral public. Its schools nnd junior colleges, and city The Amcric:UlB ar Association's goal is to make The public bcctcr and county boai:tls of educntion. Nationnl Lcg:tl Resource Center for aware of various legal issues and, al the wnc time, lc:tthe public know of AB A J>rcsidi:nt-Elctt Visia Bar Meeting our concern to serve diem. The idea that lawyers opcr.ttc in • varuum is easily:itttibutcd 10 bar nsS()ciarions. It is the SpcalccrsBureau's effort co bring lawyers "our of the wood· worlt" and let the public hear rrom them through a media of rcfiocd

prrprograms;ttc being de-signal by .uromcys who spcci:illu:in p.trticular fields who, in rum, will gnthcr around them ex~ who typically serve lawyer~m d1ose caccgotics.For c.xnmple, • program on Debcor·Crcditor Righcs may include noc only an attorney, but also a member of a acdit :usociation and a member of the Bctttt Business Bureau; a p~ conccming Divorce and ~ration wiU include not only an attorney, bur also an accountant, podiamcinn and family counselor; a prog_rarn concerning i:hc Criminal Jusul-c"Sysrcm would include not only an nnomey, but also members of vanous law enforcement The Momgomay CowuyB•r A«orurion was honorodt o h»-., W.U- Riley. ptaldcnt-elea of the agencies. A,-ian 8:,r "-1>oon (ABAJ ,..gucsupc>ka.u Jhc!romwlmcaingon I"""")' 19. Mr. Rileythen Every civic organiution in the ...,,cdthest2tt b..-hadqlwms bdott rcmmmgto Oan,11 PicnuJCn, p,mdc,,t· of d,csc copies and programs. The elect0(1hc Abb:1maSt.Uc B>r . Mr. RLlcypbns JD mum tcHhc>tttc in July-w1d1AllA Prdidcnt Morris localnewspapers w111 ru n articles on H.11ttllwho v.,ifl be:the guCJcspc11 kcr1t d,cStat~ .Bar Ann11al Mocting in 8i1m1n&h:an,. Tilt folloWlng these pr0.;rams so ns to info m, the "''tck rhay,~ ·ill be 111 Ad;int.1for the ABJ\Annu:i. l /1.i«ung WhereR.i tcy" 'Ill a~sunN:the offke or public of rhcir availability. p.-oid&:n~ Ir is duough the above cfTons that die Biffill!lgruunBar Association's S~crs Bureau hopes to ~ its $CtViccto the community. If any Imagine: rc3dc,- knows of or belongs to an You're about to erect a organization whicl, wowd be int'Cl'estcdin uriliiing the servicesof spectacular new office tower . the Birminghan1 BarSe_c:ikcrs Bureau, please contact Rodney A. Max nt 326-s76oor Beth Carmichael There's just one small hitch. •t 251~006. The site for the monumental new office buflding seemed perfect . Except ror one thing. The company preferred not to DcCatlo succeeds Harris on have a tra in ru nning t hrough t he IObby. But a railroad held a right of way across the property. and Court of Crimin al Appeals train tracks were scattered over part of an otherw ise On February 1, 1983,J udge John r. picturesque scene. A number of other problems threatened to DcCarlo becamepresi ding judge of the shatter everything. Alabama Court of Criminal Ac,pcals, They didn't. Because Commonwealth worked with counsel electedby memberson the bcncnto liU and representat ives from the rallroad. the city and the the posinoo of Judge John 0. futris . Judge Hanis h:adtnfonncd the coun company to keep th ings on the track . So the building-I nstead of his iJcsirc to be relievedof the duties of the 5 o'clock express-arrived right on schedule. or presidingjudge for health r=ons , Whether your project ls an office buflding that's and so that he could dcvore more rime stretching skyward. or a single-family home that ·s sitting to research and writing. He wiUserve pretty. call Commonwealth. Our service really .£fill.make the remaining two years of his six-year a difference. tcnn o n the court tha1 he has been a We turn obstacles Into opportun it ies. member of since Fcbruacy 1972. On assuminghis new posici.on on the coun, Judge Dc:C.rto sa~, "I am U COMMONWEALTHLAND ' proud to~ associatedwith mro of the l!i!i lTTUI~ COHPANY caliber of th~ on the Court of AW.OC•C.....-C:...,.., Criminal Appealsand = honored to 164 St. Francis Street • P.O. Box 2265 be chosen as tbcir presiding judge.'' Mobile. AL 36652 , (205) 433·2534 The State Bar * of Alabama exclusively endorses one professional liability program designed specifically for Alabama attorneys.

For more information, send this card to Insura nce Corporatio n of Amer ica, P.O. Box 56308, Houston, Texas 77256.

I am interested in receiv ing more informat ion on The State Bar of Alabama's Endorsed Professiona l Liability Program .

Address ______

City ______State __ ___ Zip _ __ _

Phone------

Date Your Current Policy Expires------Lawyers Head State Government

G ovemorG:orge C. W:all~cc(admiu-cd t o bar, 1942), Lt. Governor Bill Baxley ( 1964), Spw:crTom Drake ( 1963) and OticfJusricc C. C. To~n, Jr. ( 19S4) wcttswom in Jmuary 17, 1983 to head dtc Exccurfrc, Lcgislarh·c 311dJudicial br.tnchcs of govcmmmt for die next four years. Go"cmor W:allacehas sclect~-danomcy Ken Wallis of Bir­ mingham as his legal advisor and attorney Henry Stegall of Ozark to be his Finance Director.

Bru

Torbert

Orm SpeakerTom Drru has organizedthe House by naming the following attomcys ro leadership positions: Rcprcsencati,•c Charles Langford, Montgomery­ Chairman Judiciary Representative Rick Manley, Demopo lis-C hairman Banking n.nd Vit-e Chairman Judiciary RepresentativeJohn Casey, Hcllln-C hairman R.ulc:s Representative Jim Campbell, Anniston- Vice Chairman Banking There arc eleven lawyersin rhe I Tousc,plus Rcprcscnrntive Phil Poole who graduated from the University of Alabama Sd1ool of Law in January and rook the bar ex:imination in February and RepresentativeJarushia Thornton, a IJ1wschool srudcot at Miles College, who cxpeCGto graduate in May of this year. In addition ro those named, the following attorneys arc Rcprcscntntivcs: Tom Nicholson, Jasper; Morris Brook, Huntsville; Jerome Tucker, Birmingham; Alben Johnson, Phenix Cit)•; Harn \V"tlson,Montgomery ; Michael Box, Sara­ land. Sm2tc Judici:try: Earl Hilli.ird, Chairman, Birmingham; Rco Kirkland, Vice ~airman, Brcwron; Roger lkdfonl , Russellville;Gary Al­ dridge ,. Han:sellc; Steve Cooley, Cullman; Jim Smith, Huntsville; Larry K«ner , G,,dsdcn; John Amari, Birming­ ham; Mac Pmons , Birmingham; R)'20 dcGralfcoried, Tus­ caloosa; Spencer Bachus, Binninghw,; Lister Hill Procror, Sylacauga;and Don Harrison, Montgomery. Rouse Judiciary: Ollll"lcsLangford, Otairman, Montgomery; Rick Manley, Vice Chairman, Demopolis ; Nathan Ma.chis, Slocomb ; Midt.1clBox , Mobile; Jim Campbell, Annisrcm;Jim Bennett, Birmingham; ]w,kln, Gadsden; Jarushia TI,ornton, Birmingham; Ham Wilson, Montgomery; Al Johnson, Phenix City; Glen Browder, Jac:.ksonvillc;M orris Bl'ook.s,Huntsville; Richard Laird, Roanoke; Loyd Coleman, Arab; Bob Albright, Huntsville.

99 HOW TO WRITEA FEELETTER This lll'tidt is bri119 repri,,r.e,/ 1101hpm 11is· AND OTHER WAYS TO MAKE sio11fro m l.e9nl £ amomir.s, wlu:rtie ap­ pmred i11r /Je Mnrr:IJIA.pril 1979 itfllt, n11d ENDS MEET frr,m tbe a,,rJ,or. William P. Pi1111nis a JH1mierin the lawfim, ofPill11a&Om,m. Williom P. Pinn• r .A. i11RRkit}/1, North O.roli11n.

An inform al survey concernin g methods law 6rms use in coUccti ng - accounts rccciwb le was adm inistered Figure 1 by the Committ ee of Billin g, Work in Contract for Contingent Pee A.rrangcmenrs Progres s and Accounts Receivable of th e Section of lk onomi cs o f Law A&A A tton1cy, at Law Pra.ctice of the American Bar Associa- tion. The resul ts r«civ ed fro m 44 RH: ------firms of various sizes in 24 s12ccsarc the basis for this article. C..c1uJcmcn:

t herebymain A&.A :u myitttomcysin theabovc--cap cioncdcase and a ll casesanungouc Gett ing • Retain er .. , •aid osc. I IUldcuuDddw 1"" willrepn:scm me ., .U "l&<' of mis pcoa:cdulgone! ,..;n dibgmdy pn,occutt lhls cat< to il>cbest of your abil,,yunol srnlcmcntis rachcd <>d th:u: 11c:1tlcn\Cntormymc orcasc.swi lln ot be cfl"c'-'tcd irresistible logic that it is cc:nnomicaJJy withoucmy roructu. sounder to charge against money ad­ Foryour Ja"\ica :u •nomcy., it i, ,g,ccd th••you ilwl ra:ch'Ciwc:ruy-fi•'< pctta,t (2''11,) vanocd than co dun for unpaid wot\, of ,111y_, <«10•t1tdbdon: th< mmpbmt if filed, lhiny-thltt one!onc-thitd pcmnt there seems to pcrsisr an entrenched rc­ (5' lt,li) of Jltf ,moum tt'ffll of kttkmmt. fonypctea11 (•o,; ) of any amot«,ucnrroan appcil or 1ny asc or <'»Cl . l 11grt:ethat I shallpay ll Ul"()&t:1 or in:\·csdgo.Don, retainer on a new piece:o f business,, de· tJcrb~recs. c:o u.rr rcponcrs, depo,itions. Mmogr.iphcrs.mmsaipt.l. " 'irnw ICC$,jury fees, spire the fact that most attorneys who .11>pc:1I (iccs,. noary fcu and 11nyother a»ts nrccssa,ytQ a proper CCNV:lw:iooof my Q.SC . require such rcraincrs find that clients in f.ia e.

,.ppcovtd thi, ____ d,y of ------, 19_. Establishing a Pee for One -Tim e " &.... Consultati ons a nd Initial Conf erences for New Clicnu This advice has 2ppliability to rcb­ civdy smaller general practices where new clico ti; arc apt ro come in infon11nlly by way of referral or simply vfa the yel­ two immediate benefits . First, you firm and says: " I thought I would be low pages. screen out "shoppers " and potcnti•I charg

100 Md dcnrol practice, md by now it is more probable that a consumer expc,cis this procedure rh,111" advice now/p;ty Figure :l later." Hourl y Pee Agreement A, B& C AtmfflC)'> Al Law llll, _ __ _ Making a Written Fee Controct wid1 Written Disclosure of Billing I/We hcrcbvh1n- ,he l•w firm of ------'3'n1 )•/our 2i...;mcy5in 1hc~bc>\ 'C'-dc:sign:uc:d,11:11,<'.rand shall p:ay$ --- perhour ro; Expa:ta tions lll(h flnn·s lq;alscrvl cd , "Handsh:tkc" fee arrangcmt'.nts arc 1/\Vcl,a\'

id u, rcnincrwluclulull be acdncd m m)Jour acooum Thu nororious progcml<)rsof confusion.dis ­ lC<" DO< rdund>bic, unlcu ~ ~ uin,. agrc=em and debate when rime for J./\\'c:,Jul f»:Y S - pa hour fnrtame tta\--d&ng 1.1\ 1h11 rm:cu:r coginhcr ~,ch .ill mcysat Law past-due bills. Pigurc 3 is a fee conrrncr that contains IUl 1 ------~ several variations offce ammgemcncs, in the alternative: a lump sum payment ar VWf mate a.nd the tinn 1hc Acxibiliry of re.­ $ ~x.h. due an or befored tc: 10th of c.1d1mon~ begln.nlng 10. 19 , m addiboc, m ,he =u1cr fee dacrib

"" Billin g Ba.rty, and Bsa blish.ing complishcd. The bill wm1 our rbc fol· caUsarc made b)' a non•rromcy, such as a Rcgufar Review of Bills lowing montl1, and the client reported: bookkeeper or office manager. In other 1) that he hnd not reali7A:d his bill would lirms, only atromeys m:ikc call'l-to the Unfortun ately, too many attornt)'~ be quire so much; 2) tlm if he had delinquent clients for whom they ha,•c have haphwml billing cycles due mokc known bow much it was earlier, when he pro,ided $Crviccs. Approaches by tele­ regularreview of troublesome acroums received the money, he would have had phone arc usually low key, such as: "We difficult, and tlm prc\'cnt detection of die whcn:with:il to pay the bill; 3) that, thought you might not have rcce.ived problem debtors early before the pattern as things stood, most of the recovery oLtrsrarcmcm; if you have not, we will be becomes irreversible. lt ls not a novel money had been spent and he would glad to furnish you another one.nor , "u observation that, witl1 the difficulties ha,·c to work out payment arrangements th= any problem with the services we presently cxpcrienccd in as h flow in all with tile firm. The lessons of this fee have provided. or some questions •bout sectors of the economy, dcbrors will pay fiasco •re obvious: O,mmunica te fees our bill. l f so, wbco can we meet ro 1hosc bills lirsr which they feel can po­ early and bill promptly. discuss these problems? ( If there is no tentially hnrm them tl1e most if left un· After a regular billing cycle bas been pro blem, when can ,vc expect pay· attended. Obviously, ifan attorney doe$ set and m•intaincd, review of outStand­ mcot? )" not csablish rcgubr billing, he or she ing bills bca>mcs imperative• .Bills un­ Approaches by telephone can be wiJIJIOtrccch ·c rcgubr billing payments. paid at die end of the 11cx1 billing cycle suonger : "We canno1 afford to carry The end result is chaos, because mo~1 (presumably 30 days later) should be you any longer. We must have payment persons plan their money maMgcment sorted our for special attention by the :1t once"; "We :ire.n ot your bankers, ,vc carefully wirh nn eye rownrd paying a bill anomc y rnos1involved in providing the h•vc ovcrhC3d COstS to meet, just like at a rime proximate ro completion of client scrvi«s in que stion. you.9 services. The useo f computer services for bill­ When billing is delayed, the client ing bas already simplified the task of might use money originaUy allocated for ochieving regularity and control of col• payment of legal services to pay other lcction of acrounts in many offices. Using a Collection Agency and Suit bills-bills whi.ch might be pn:ssc:dmore on 311 Account assiduously than his attorney's. In one reported case, a client agreed to pay an • A co llectio n agency . T he hourly rate of 150 for leg.ti services in· threat of use of n collection ngcncy is, of Using the Telephone for Collection of volving a hc:iltl1 clain1. The client was course, no thrc•t 10 a practiced dcodbc•t, Pasr-Duc Accoun ts billed approximately fSOO for vario~ or co a client who ishopelessly insolvent . negotiations tlm brought •bout a re· This is a sensitive am for many attor­ Nor is the use of a collection agency covcry in excessof $3.400 . The client neys. Approximately 25 pcrccntoftbosc l ikely ro yield results for • firm that hM was grateful and happy wi1h the anor· responding to the questionnaire sratcd its own cstnblishcd followup proce· ncy's services. The only problem arose that telephone calls arc used in an effort dures, promptly administered by tdc · when the billing for die services rco· to bring p:ist accounts current. Practices phone and by letter, for p>St-due ac­ ducd was overlooked for the monthly v:irywith lirms' philosophies as ro who counts. As a practical matter, if a law cycle in which the recovery was ac- should make • call. In some finns the finn , with its advantage of superior

Figure+ Notice of Past-Due Account P, P, & G Attom cys ar I.Aw Ot.a:rC1icn ,:

End<)li SCM«Sduring()a(>bct , 198 1. 1\/hllc I pcnon,UyI m'< h>d Uttlca,naa w11hl"' "' lcg>laffi>inon = lllDlllhs,~ undctour irucmalo ffia:,yuan, I am rcspomiblcfoe )'OW' llaOUDL Wluk I un plcascd,.,th chcinau>ing ,'Olumc of lcg>l,.'OCt ,. .• arc dot"I!r oe-)""'•I ""'concurrmdy dutumcdb)• me build up or ynor unp:oo balana.W e have rccc, ,,:,d no paymcni,ioo:A ugus, } t , 1981.A Uwoci umdno p•yb • foolilh wayco run• law offiould apprcda1c rour calling me M>th :u: ',Yecu dlsc.t"",h e mancr.

Vc,y ""1y )'OW'J,

101 knowledge •bout whar rcaU)• can be done to dfccnmc a legal rocovcry. can nor achieve an account settlement ancr diligent clforr, rhc account will probably be worthlessm pursue. Introduce The collection agency can serve as a shield for • firm th:u: docsnot w;anr ro Your Clients engage at all in dirttr dunning of clients (or fom1cr clients). Selection of such an agency should be made wid1 care, with toa specialc hecks on its professional rcpura­ tion. Valuable Service. • Suit o n an acc ount . One of the greatest l'lboos in the legal profes­ Refer them to Business Valuatio n Services for expert sion has been the aauals uit of a client for detem, ination of fair market valu e of bu sinesses, and • fee. One fear is the specter of counter­ financial analy s is and con sultation in cases of: suits or defenses based on claims of mis­ representation of anticipated re.mks 0 Estate planning D ean1r as a sran­ dud practice, including not only de­ railed rime records bur mcmorand• of Construction Dispute? clients' instmcrions and responses to ad­ vice. If all ls in order, and a case has been pursued vigorously, educ.illy and profes­ Call an Expert! sionally, suit be the only a,·cnuc m.1y When conlrorrted with a construction open to preserve credibility. Lawyas claims case, put WHl 's exper tise to work perform this scr,~ccroutinely for others. lor yo u in prepari ng a winning strategy . ·nicrc is no parrirular reason why the aphorisum " l'hysicinn, benl thysclP' WH I has success full y pro vided ex pert should no r be appticd to attorneys, who claims analysis and preparatio n services ffl: best able among all professions to on settlements worth more than S4.5 bi l­ adv.um: the cau.sccomning deficiencies lion on both national and interna tional in their own collection procedures. construction projects . Call WHI today for an expe rt consultation. wagner -hohns-inglis -inc . 812 ParkAvonut,_,._ Labc.lingor Stamping Messages on __ P:ut• .Due Bills (504)6215-4471

One sample label submitted read 05 Mcl!Mlt"°'f,HJ . ~ 0.C.. '"""Fl follows: "Our p3St due accounts arc re• San F~ CA • Ka,,t;as Qy, MO • La OflCl nl•, CA fcrrcd ro commercial collection division, ... 'IP~H ------PIN-M .,nd--- 1o1•------ye 1n btoci,u r, on WHI---- dll m11tl'Ylott------Oun & Bradsm:ct, Jnc." Another read: Name------" Please advise why you arc withholding Company ______your rcmirrancc." Address ______

City ______Sl81e__ ZIP-----

IOJ Notice of Pan •Ouc Aaount _FiguresA X, IU!c Y Attomq• at Law Oc:ir 0 1mt1

In reviewing your .sa.1cmt'n1, I have noc-iccdrh:u -,hcrc h:u 001 bc<:11t rtea u p.iyrnc:nr n1:adc. 011roflice poJicyis ro rc«i\'C 1);1.ymentb1 11d1,• ;i.ncc or upon co111plcllonor the work. Under cemiln cittum!ltttnt'd we wlUallow a clicn, thirty (30) day,:afi-cr rcuipt of our $u,tcn\Cnrm cn:i.ke p.tymcnt.

l-10\\·cvcr,when an :llt(()WU r( .1n:1,l.n., unp:aid,~ )'QW"S ~ we h.aVC'\·cry (cw :a!tcnuo,;cs. N.uunlly, ""c would hope w continue: our good tcbuomlup. but this rrqw.rcs )"·•ur coapcn.tioin.

w, hope>""will w,dcnw,d our pooitionmdmm pomf" P'ymatt. lf)'OU can: to disam ,..,.. ,-,.,.,, plai< a>oaa usimmcdd1cly. Youis ,=, INiy.

Figure sB Figure sC Notice of Past- Du e Account Notice of l''1St·Duc Account X, R&Y X, R & Y Attorneys ar Law Attomcy, 11 Law Dcu Om,r:

Th.Ink)'OU for )'OU< P')ma>t of J$0 00. Th< bihna, on)""" bell1> It bas a>m< to my .ncntlon that • P'rn-t bas not bom nude oo now JOOO. )'OUr>cXOWtt with !his 011'1«.Thof Billing>. marrcro,·cr t0 Crcdn Scn,cc Co., Inc.

Yourj very lruly, Your, \'Cry rroJy.

Notice of Pist•Duc: Accowlt Pigurc 6A M, M&M Att:On\C)'I .at Law D<>rO'IOlt: The cnc.loscdsm.cmmt SJ our n;,cc,td o(rh(':sum ilOW our:standmgun )'Out account. \Ye \\-OIJ.kf apprtaacc ICif'yoo \\"Ould cbcc:k)"0\11' rcconb and c,r yuu Ond tl= the bill h., no< )'rt beenp,ld ) =d us yow-ch«k or ,noncy order fe)rt he •mount lndicuod. I(, howr,'CI',th

Figure 68 Notice of Put ·Ouc: Account Figure 6C M. M&.M Notice of Put -Due Account Attomc yt at Law M,M &.M Ocill'C lim t: Auon1e:ya .at L.1.w L'.l,cto."icdplease findour &cucmcncror .services m,dcnxl. whichwa, Oa l'Oicnl: b,lkd originally oo ------1 h.t,'l' .set an o1ppomuntr'ltfor ------­ This""'°'""Im bom billedmd 1$ nowronJidcral po.,< due. Sin<< '°tit,,....., rnoydixuu p>ymr<."'" would ~«- )'OU' uoc:ntlonto p>)ffldlL I( )'OUwish to...-.ngc lmaDmmtp•)mmt> plai< conaa ohu<>lrn hnmcdiacdyand ,-c v.ill vnng.e ,1 paymentpbn and ooc.c-ow-rccorcb. Sin«rdy,

.... Sending Demand or «Dunning'' Letter s By far rJ1e most common method of attempting collectio n of past-due ac­ Notice of Past-D ue Account councs is the writing of letters to the P,D&G delinquent client. Attomcys at Law Typ ically, a first reminder lette r is ru, effon at friendly persuasion. One such letter is shown in Figure 4. Dc:arOi cnt: Mose firms that imp lement a formal The mattero r)'our i.nclebtcdllCSS rothis ·offi ce in the arnountofs_ ___ w.urai~c:d ara billing review, whether in 30-60- or 90· recent Lnecting of dH:members of the firn1. day stages, or any other cycle, administer a three- letter program before final action \Ve arcco named :i:boutthe f.la.th:u there h:i.s been no paymentrccdvcd on this account. This amount has been QUtst'.mding since ------on a past-due account is taken. Figures 5, 6 and 7 comprise three secs of demand .Pleaseconsider this Jettera friendJy reminderand requestfor paymentat this time. letter packages, each consisting of three lf you -a.repccsendy unable to paythe babncc:in fuU,pk~~ contactme so th.1t I can be progress ively insistent letters labeled 2.d,•isedof )'OUr plans for the liquidationof yourindebtedness. "A", "B" and"C." The packagesvary in Thankyou for die anticipatedpromptne.ss of your reply. sryle 3Jld approac h and arc meant to be suggestive of approaches that could be Very truly yours, used by firms that present ly have no formal plan for collections. They can be mixed ruid matched , or simply used as Figure 7B food for tho ught in tailoring demand letters tO the needs of a specific fim1 and Notice of Past-Due Account cliem. P,D&G The thrust of iliesc demand letter Attomcys at Law packages is that required to get a re­ Dear Oiau : sponse and a com mitment ro pay. A good introduction , in 311ycase, is to Perhapsyou h;1vco,·c:rlooktd what we had intended tO be a friendlyreminder of your suggest a mectmg to find out if the client obligation for the paymentof the balanceowing on our fee in the above-a:rtidcdmatter . has ru1y q uestions about the biU. Figure Ple:asele t us hearfro1n you ,vidiin d1c next tm days. 6C goes so faras co ser a date and rime for Very mdy yours, the meeting. Depending o n thcnamrcof the client, rhiscan be very effective. Since CERTIFLED MAIL RETURN RECEl.l'T REQUESTED man y people can avoid coming to realistic grips with finmcial obligatio ns indefinite ly as long as they think past· due accorn1rs will be tolerated, the set· Figurc7C ting of 3J1exact time for a review meeting (with a foUow•up confim1ation call by Notice of Pa.st· Due Account the billing partne r or an appropria te e,o&G member of his support stafl) cru1 bring Attorneys at Law the immediate natur.c of a firm's demand Dear Clienr: into focus, much like rJ1e setting of a court dare. As all attomey sknow, when a In the pasrseve ral wccb youhave r eceivedtwo lettersfrom this officerequesting the long long-pe nding case is pu t dow n in black o,•erduc payment of the lnlancc of our fees in rbcabo ve-entitledmatter. and white for hearing 011 a final calendar, Unless my informationi.s iocorroct,)'OU have complecdy ig1torcdth<)(SC rcquC$ts. cases that have gone unattended have a While "'e auly regrcchaving to placeonrsel\'ts in advc11itywith dientS in mattersof chis way of getti ng settled quickly. narur~I must adviseyou th:icun1f."$$ your.1«ounr is paidin fuUwithln te n ( l O)days from dte Even if a complete payoff cannot be date hereof, we will sue you for $ plus iutttdt fto,n ------achieved, after you have gotten a deb· Ple:ascbe :.1SSurcdth.1c this is the fastL ener of personalcorrespondence on d1is matterthat tor,s attention, a significant do,vn you will nxeive from thisoffice. payment might be elicited, o r you might V cry truly yours, be able to secure an appropriate note-­ preferab ly secured. Anything is better CERTIFlED MAIL than having an account lie unt ended RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED until it is so stale that it is absolutely uncoUectible.O

IOl There will be no 111ei11oramfomtbis m~mtJ,fl$ Mr. F11irweat/Jeris IJW")' 011 his ann11niwu:ati011 in the Cap11anb/ands . ~aii"lVeather, ~e arepri,,ting, instead, thisposteard frmn Jnm: C.Winteis& Mr. Dearest Finn, I greet you from the sunny Caribbean. All is not ,vc.U.Toe weatheris hot The air Arnold B. Kanter ~ommeri wnditioncr in our condo hM been erratic. And d1e ceiling fans, while quaint :u,d ttopi­ cal, blow Mrs. Ps hair (would that I had some to blow) around something awful, :u,d make a terriblerac ket, besides. The pool is loaded with children-mainly gr:u,dchi ldrcn, I dun k- Md l fear that the wwnd, of d,c pool water is not oltogcthcr atttibucab lc to the sun . The kids arc mean. Nooe of diem wi.11give me a tum in dicir inner rubesor rafts,and they seem neveroo shut up, radicr like some of youin committee meetings. And speaking of commitrcc meet­ ing>, cancel diem until I get back. There is () nothing that can't wait • I have found lying around die beach to be very condudvc to diinking about legal prob· .· ~ ·.· . ;) . , , lcms. lo fuct, I run considering redoing die • ofllcc in 3 Caribbeanmotif in order to in· creaseo ffice productivicy.Have. d1c inttrior . . . . -: designersketch out a few altc::marives:for n1c . . . .. to consider when I rcrum. .ln the meantime , I want die guys from d1c mailroom to remove the oriental rug and roUtop dc,;k from my office and haul in four tons of sand, wicl1a~ortcd dgarcttc butts. Also, have the bulbs in my chandelier re· placed wicl1s un lamps. And I think it's word, invC$tingo ll1tle time in a o:oining program to teach the messcogcrs co bring in me office mail and coffee with a little calypso beot (you Paul Hoffinan kn.O\\', "Day.. o, lSS.lda y, is~ day~issa day•:iy.. ay-o.») If we arc going to do it. ler', do ir The piloc has proved such a success dm we seemed genuinely co enjoy the formight !hat rigbL hove fr.mdused lhrcc oases on other parcs of she spent with me and Mrs. P at d1c condo I'm afraid Ibara lot of my best ideas on this the island, .Uof which seem robe prospcring while writing her piece and she fuirly gushed trip may be in peril of getting loot forever. I as wcU. This may be due to !he catchy jingle over the black coral accldacc\VC gave her as a brought one of tJ,ose newf.mgfcd pocket \VCarc n1nning o n localradio , ..you deserve a little remembrance on her last night . dictators along, but I forgor die damn rapes. bl'cak today, so gcr up and geeaway, to the Pleaseexpress mail l:\voor threeassocia tes, Pl.case ship Ms. Oxcnhand lc down die quick­ Fail"\vcathcrOases , we do it a ll for you­ a couple of paralegals, an assortmen t of sec• est ,va)r, oo·oo." We arc thinking of adding the " Big rccaricsand a receptionistto stafl'our office I have: been giving some prc.Uminary Stan,» a doublerurcJc.burgcr ..virh aimmings, pronto . I say pronto because I sec death as lhoug l1t to our establishing a brand, office to the mcau. Fururcpromos mayfcarurc dis • one of die prime growth areas. And, frankly, down here . While the lack of clients issome­ counts on simple \Vills \vith the purchaseof a there arc several of my new buddies down thing ofa drawback, the idea has some com ­ Big Stan and an Oasis Shake. here ,vbo, even \\'ith their gorgeousto.ns, pensating features which , for tax fraud rea­ Suffice it to say, Pvc opened die branch don't figure to cclebrare too many more sons, l ,von't delve into here. Trust me. office. R,cmind me co have the cxccurivc W35hington's birthdays. And Pm ,vork.ingon an idea to improve committee ratify diis when I get back. Last Thursday it was overcast for several the client situation and develop a new p[ofit ln d,c mcmtimc, you may,van .t to pick up hours so I dropped in on die local low sd,ool center for rl>c firm at the same time. The a copy of the Apnl issue of American Lawyer, co try to scare up some potential fodder for problem wid, p«>ple running die odicr large whid1 Is nmning a nice little feature on me d>e home office. What a pleasure ro speak 10 law firms today is they're too srodgy co give a and our new Cayman oflicc entitled "Stanley srudcnts ,vho, not havm.gbecome accus~ bold , new concept a try. Mrs. F and T arc J. Fairweather says it's sink or swim in the t0med ro fealty, treat the rwcory minute caking turns manning the pilot lemonade Caymans ," comp lete wicl, phoco of yours intcrvic,vas a chatamong equals , ratherthan stand cbatwcsctupundcra la.rgc umbrellao n truly in scuba gear. While the reporter , Sheila die grant of an audience co their potcnrial the beachnear our condo. This has puc us Ln Sto\va,vay, \\-as gracious enough t0 refer to employer. This may come from the island close:couch ,vith lots of potential'clicn~, me as "chc majesticc.aglc ray in a school of being too small for cmploycrs t0 flystudents sinceour competitiveprices and t):ic.nd.lyscr· guppies who dwcU around his legal rccf,n I from coast to coast. 1 \ ices have attracted huge cro.. vds co the don't think that she was intending to put any In candor , diough , I am nor having the "Fairweathe r Oasis." of you down personally. Ms. Stowaway type of success recruiting-wise cliat I had

106 hoped for, in pan because it is not ~ to racuda. And even d,ough cl,c Caymoo Jour­ absurd. There: isn't anybody around even re· pooh•pooh convincing ly a 16s degree rem· nal of Tra.nsoccanic Treasure T rove is the morcly as gifted as I in runn ing rl,c firm. So, pcrarurc diffc.rei·u.:e (even rhough Pvc arguc..-d mochcrship of the TIT jo1irnal Acee,c:.,eeri­ for thoseof you who drearm rlm this might vigorously ,u1d, to n1r n,indl persuasively, cnce on it may not n1akea student a shoo-in be your big chance, forger ir. that cl,c windd, ill f.icwr skp image as at· here,the re is an oppom,niry to rdlccc, ro be this posrc.ard.The day is dra,ving to a close. trib ut~blc to air conclirion i.ng failure and son1C\vhat mo re introspective. l have ust-d T ime ro shur do,vn rl,c: Fainvcathcr Oasis, suggest dlat \Ven 1ay \Vant to \\•aJtz rhat line: pan of d1is time to ponder n1arrcrs su,h as ru n up co the t."Ondo ro sho,vcr, fix a pina 'round rhc.:1.3 ,v schools, states ide. firn1 structure and governance. Having n1lcd colada and ,vatd1 the sun set o n the gcnt1y Untbnu natcly, ho,vcvcr, even the rop sru• the firm ,vith an iron, but render, fist for the heaving ocean. dents do,vn here rn ay not be of great use ro L1.Stqu3rtt ·r century, ir has occurred to me, 3S Wish you all could be here. But you're not. us. They seem ro be p~-occupied wirh qucs• I'm sure it nutst have occurred, nc Jc.a.sti1t And I am. So car }'Our hearts out. tions d1at arc of only tange ntial relevancero p;using, to son,e of you front tin,e ro tin1c, tho.,;cof us 11orth of Cuba, such as ,vhcchcr a thar ir might be rhe hO l.lr to pass the:to rch ro a dive b«lt opcraro r is liable in rort tOr leading younger generation. a dive group imo a school of hung ry bar- O n reflection, ho"·cvcr, char sccnu to me St1111/cy

LEGAL VIDEO SERVICES • Videotape Depositions • Wills Medical Testimony • Day in the Life of ••. Absent Witnesses • Demonstrative Evidence FOREST MANAGERS& CONSULTANTS Geriatric Plaintiffs • Statements Produc t Liability • Confessions • Electronic Editi ng P. 0 . Box 2143 Phone 438 ·4S8 1 FOR APPO INTMENT OR INFORMA TION We will work with y ou, Mobil e, Alabama 366S2 Area Code 205 CONTACT repor1e, ort o, your con­ J OHN JENNINGS venlffl~ •rra nge one 205-272-4870- MONTGOMERY tor you ....

Now you can get Yearl y Renewabl e Term (YRT) Ufo TERMLIFE Insuran ce pro tec tion at re duced ra tes. ' 11,is plan incl udes t.hese importa nt.bene fits: INSURANCE • I ndMd ually-owned polic ies-you control tl,e policy and exercise nil rights of ownership, including transfer l\1ADE AVAILAB LE 1D of owners hip. :MEMBERS BY THE • D lsablU ty waiver of prem.itun-i f you become totally and µem,anently disab led (as defined in the policy) before age 60, premiums a.rewaived for tl1e du raUon of ALABAMA U1edisabilify . • Accidental deaU1 benefit-if death occurs by SlXf.EBAR accidental means before age 65, an accidental death benefit eq ual to the I.em, life insurance an1ou nt is payable (subject to exclusions specified in U,e po li cy). • Divid ends-s ince YRT is participati ng insura nce, you share in the actual mortalify experie nce of al l insureds NOW.AT tuider YR'J: When such mortalify experience is fa\'orable. a dividend is passed along to lhe policyho lders in tl1e fon11of reduced net rates. Dividends are not guaranteed REDUCED and depend on future plan experience . • Maxi.m um coverage-up to 8500,000 coverage is available under tl1is plan . 11,is includes the touu of all RATES life in$urnnce coverage you may curre ntly have under tltis policy form. 1-;o,or 1nore infornulti<>nabc n.tt YRf life insura nce conmct: rnsuruncc Specinllsl.s Incorporated l 'nd~f\\ 'l'iltc.n by City Federal B uildin g Nott h\\ 1CSlcn > NuUo un.1 Llfe I ns 111"1\r1e!C ro ,npnn ~~ ~llnn cnp(,IIS. ) IN' Blrmb1 g bruu, Alabama 35203 1·800-241-7753 (toll-free)

T/Jt Altrba11utLaia,-rr "'' <.ftC.Uappened at the <-Bar n, e Positive Witness And she rcpbcJ, ~ I will swear on a notepaper, wrote the words on 11, 3tld Judge Grubb appoinR-dme to defend stack ofB iblcs rfos is the nt3Jl that did it, handed it ro the judge. Ory-cleaned it 11man cl131;gcdwith couarcrfo1ting.The ,u,d you cnn't mix me up." read, ~1 would likc ro sleep with yott," Jllegcd1.'0UJUerfcitonc-dollnr bill was so TI1cjudge read it and each juror in nin1 Love io Bloom crude that ir occum:d to me that 1111y read ir and p:i.sscdit along. Finally the note was handed 1:0 Number I oo the w1mc:s.swho <'Ouid not tcU tt from 3 A few month.. ago, we had an wtre­ genuine ooe·dollar bill would nm be hca.rsttl comedy in fudge MeElro)'s back'°" , n l.ulyof ampk and incc resting :iblc to tcU lhc defendant front anybody roua:thanvasonct>fthe bestJ eversaw. proportions. Her neighbor, a gentleman c:1$c. The female pwntiff had suc:d the male on the right, was dozing; ~he had tu On cross-,x1mination, I told the rro­ defendant fur using obscene language in shake him awake and then ~he h.tndcd him the nore. He read it, nodded plca\'l1at did he say?" I le replied,~Nor on your life, Judge. prosccucinganomc:y. (He has just rc­ The lady replied, ~It wasso vile that ir tln.-d3~ justice of the Alaban,aSupn,mc, was unspeakable. I would nor soil my This is a high!)' personalmatter between Coun.) lips with the four•kttt'I' ~'Ords he ust'd.~ me and this bdy." This was the point in a pn:tt)' dull I ~id, "Ob, somebody mid you, The judgeasked her if >hewould wore high mAI.O didn't they!" it She was supplied with a sheet of A glance a decade past - ""1csc1ncmorabJc C,;'l.,e:\ arc c-ucrpti1rrwn 8,rmtngh;ambwyerFnnds H4Harc'slx.,,ok i\f, r.,• .,.,d F"""'-M mvma ,f • 1'"a/ t,,..,.. Mcmlicnor the b.,,""' .._"~ lo JUbmJc lnt.-,ngtalcsoflllCrlJl>r.lbi

,1

'l"'hiiphoro \\~~ row 1d '" .1 fik orolJ pinuru >t d11blt pubb<»k)Cl Mn.no'tllAir Fotu BMe in Mom9umcryfor one of dJt n11111yu,w Day rro,ts ,f IWJ. M~"19°:""?'lfl'tlml

"'' ~bout Meinbers ~1nong Firms

Hand, Arendall, Bedsole, Greaves Benjamin H. Richey and F. David About Members & Johnston , 30th Floor First National Lowery arc pleased to announce the Sheila Roberts Tweed has been B:lllk Building, Mobile, Alabama, formanon of a partnership for d1c named partner in die Houston law takes pleasure in annotuicing mat Joe general practice of law under dlc fim1 firm of Forcm:lll & Dyess. Ms. Tweed E. Basenberg has become a partner in name of Ricl1ey & Lowery with was awarded her J.D. degree from the die firm. offices located at 501 Nortli Jackson Cumberl:llld School of Lliw in 1976, Avenue, Russellville, Alaban,a 35653. graduating cum laudc. She was admitted to the Alabama Bar that same year. Foreman & Dyess, with l11e law finll of Aldridge & Larry C. Jarrcll has joined his law offices in Houston and Washington, Haddock is pleased to announce d1at D.C., is a general civil practice f,m, of practice with that of John B. Craw ley Gary L. Aldridi!:e has been elected at 103S. Three Notch Street, Troy, 77 attorneys. senator for the tni rd senato rial district Alabama. l11e maifu1g address is P. 0. of Alabama which is comprised of Box 426, Troy , Alaban1a. portio ns of Morgan and all of Aliceville native, Libby Kirksey, Lawrence Collllty. l1 1e firm is located has been selected as d,e first female ar 215East Moulton Street, Decamr, Alaban1a 356o1. Leonard Wertheimer, Ill, P.C. Member of the Year Award winner by announces the opening of his office me Greater Tuscaloosa 01amber of for the practice of law at 555Bank For Commerce. Ms. Kirksey is an arron1C)' Savings Building, Birmingham, with Gulf States Paper Corpora tion. Alabama, 352.03.1clephonc 326-30,, . Mandell & Boyd anno unces the opening of itS new offices at 25 South Court Street (on Court Square), Broox G. Garrett of Brewton and Montgomery, Alabama. The law firms of Johnson & Charles R. Adair of Dadeville were Hornsby and HllSkey & Etheredge elected in December co the Judicial announce their merger for the practice Compensation Commission of the of law under the firm name of State of Alabama. They succeeded T. Johnson, Huskey, Homsby & Massey Bedsole of Mobile and Elisha Whittelsey , Ray & Tipton takes pleasure in annow1cing tfiat Dew ey Etheredge with offices at 1,1 North C. Poole of Greenville co four year Oates Street Post Office Box 1193, c-cm1s on d1c co1nmission. W. Teague has become a partne r w me fim, and that the firm name has Dorl1an, Alabama 36302.Telephone been changed to Whittcl sey, Ray , (:zosl 79l·3l77· Tipton & T eague. Offices arc located at 6oO Avenue A, Post Office Box ro6, Opelika, Alaban1a 36801. Silver & Voit, Arromeys at Law, P.A., annolUlces with pleasure d1at Barry L. Thompson has occome associarcd Among Firms with tfie finn in dle genera l practice of Jerry R. Barksdale takes pleasure in law. Offices arc located at 4317-A The law firm of Austin & Dobson annotU1cin_gtha t James D. Moffatt is Midmost Drive, Mobile, Alabama annotU1cesthat Robert E. Austin has no,v assoc.rated,v ith hin1in the l660!). Telephone 343-0800. been elected District Court Ju~e of practice of law at 212Soud1 Marion Blollllt Comuy and that John J. Street, Athens, Alabama 35611. Dobson will continue to engage in the general practice of law at 200 2nd Pbilliy A. laird and Henry C. Avenue East , Oneonta , Alabama. Wiley, Jr. take eleasurc in announcing rl1e formation of a partnership for the Stanard and Mills takes pleasure in gclleral practice of law under d1e firm annollllc.ing d1at F . Lenton White, II name of Laird and Wtley and d1e Richard (Cracker) Waldrop has become associated with the firm relocation of th eir offices to Suite C, announces the removal of his office to wltich is located at 1802 First National Bankhead Byars Bldg., 1816Third Suite 5, E.xecutivePlaza , Enterprise, Bank Building, Mob ile, Alabama Avenue, P. 0 . Box 498, Jasper, Alabama 36330. 36602. Alabama 35502-0498.

109 Opinions of the General Counsel William H. Moi:row, Jr.

From the Q u ESTION : ~ Whm an arromey has drafted or wimcsscd a will, m3y that attorney or a member Center for or:1$SQCiarcofhisfinn acras rrialcounscl for the proponent of the will io a will contest Professional if die attorney ought to be ailed as a wimcss for the proponent?~ ~ SWER: Responsibility Neither the nnomcy who has dr:trrcd or witnessed a wiU nor any member or associate of his firn1 shouJd act as trial counsel for the proponent of die will in a will contest if the attorney knows or ir is obvious d1at he should testify 3S to a comcsrcd matter such as the existence, vd non, of testamentary capaciry, undue influence, duress, etc. If the due execution and witnessing of rhe will is an uncontested mam:r, the attorney may testify ro the due c::~ecutionof the wiUand die attorney or a mcmbc.r or associncofhis finn may acras trial counsel in a willcontc:sr, but if tbcducexcrution of the will is put in issue, neither the anomey nor a member or ~re of his finn may act 11.'1trial counsel in a will comest involving this issue.

DI SCUSSI ON : The Disciplinary Corrurussion has been called upon on several occasions ro render opinions as to tJ1epropriety of an attorney who drafted or wimcsscd rl1eexecution of a wiUacting as the trial attorney for the proponents of the will inn will conresc.ln Ethics Opinion 348 the Disciplinary Commission held that an momey could netas a witness to the due execution nnd witnessing ofa will and, nevertheless,act ns trial counsel in a will contest when the sole grounds of the contest wns rl1c alleged cxtt ution of a subsequent wiU. In will conrt'StstJ1c co ntestants frequently allege numerous grounds indudiog the contention that the will w;is not duly executed and 1vim=I . Whctbcrornot the due: execution and wirnc::ssingofthcwill isa real issucin theaisccan uslCl!lybcdcccnniocd prior to the trial. An interesting ruscussionof this problem isfound in the case ofE/pm v. Sratrir, Fim Nr,rw,,al811nk ofSIJd,qyg an 179 N.W. 2d 88 1, (Wis. 1970 ), wherein the coun ob$crvcd: "But here, the execution was put in issuc:andwhcthcritwasro be vi~rously comcndcd or 001 could have been rcsol"cd prior co the ma.I. It seems to be customary in undue-influence cases for the objcaors 10 throw in the objection to the procedural execution of the will for good measure. When d1is is done die scrio••~ncss of d1c issue should be dcrcnnincd before trial. It is wrong for counsel co object to the execution of a wiUjust to disqualify another attorney. However, when a lawyer witnesses n w,11, citl1cr in hopes ir will enhance Msc hance of probating die will for convenience, he assumes the risk that if the execution is put in issue, his firsrducy is to hisdi cnt ro sustain me will and this requires him ro ti-cchimself completely from the issue of its admissibility. A lawyer should nor be both a ,vimc::ssfor and an advocate of die cause of action.a Ethical Consideration ;. 10 in pan provides: "le is nor objectionable for a bwycr who is a potential wimcss ro be an ad,'OCateif it is unlikely dur he will be called as a wimcss bcc:auschis testimony will relate:only co an unconrcstcd issue.» Disciplinary Ruic 5·10 1 (8) (1) and (2) pro,~dcs: "A laW)'c:rsbaU n ot accept cmploymem in conr emplated or pend· ing litigndon if he m ows or it is obvious thnt he or a lawyc:rtn his fim1o ught to be called as a wirncss, cxccertliar he mny underr:tkethe employment and he or a lawyc:ri n his finn may testify: {I) If the testin10ny will relate solely to an uncontested matter.

110 (2) If die testimony will relate solely to a matter of formality and there is no rcascm ro believe rJ,ar$ubstan tial evidence will be offered in opposition ro the testimony.~

ln die ase of }1mts v. S0111/J Dnkotn 01ildrt11'1Ho me SOtUty238 N.W. 2d 677 , (S.O. 1976) , the court poi.need out rhe "all too obvious" confliet that would arise if the attorney's testimony cmblishi ng the restttor's capacity en.tide the ano rney's firm to probate a large esrare. In die case of}11"9e v.Jm,id;i 374 A. 2d 547, (R.L 1977 ), the court urged trial judges to insist on Stria compli.meewith DR 5-10 1 (B), unlessthe f.tas brought inro play one of the exceptions under DR 5·10 1 (B). On December 10, 19112.th e Su· ln sumnury, we feel that when an morncy has drafted or ,vimcsscd a will , the prcmc C'.ourr of AlllMITlareversed the anomcy :tnd the members and :associatesin his firm should rarely, ifc, ·cr, aa as trial August 26. l 981 order of die Paso · counsel forche proponents in a will comest, since frequently iheattomcy knows or iris plmary Boardds,bamng Mayer W. obvious that he ought 10 be called as a >vimcssconccmmg matters other than the due Perloff of Mobile . l11e Suprem e execution of the >viii. Howe1·cr, if his testimony will rdare solely to the due execution C'.oun set Pcrlofl's dtsc:1phn<; "hu :h of the will, and that is not a contested issue, the attorney and the members and was imposed for p:ty,ng k.tdl>:u:kstu associates in his firm ore not necessarilyprecluded from acting as trial counsel in a will town councilmen tn rhe mwn of con rest. No rcqucsrs for opinions concerning the exceptions under DR 5· 10 I (B) (3) Saraland. at su, pcn,i (m from the and (4), in this context, have been presented to the Officeof GeneralCounse l and the pr.icriu: of 1.1" for i pcri<.l

JerryLee Stapp, Sr. of Hum.wille filed • petition for rcin.~raremem m acti,•c sranls whid, w.L~ granted by Supreme Courr ordcr on llri,lay, Jnn· nary 24, 198;1.

Q UESTION: Robert Crc:d, of l lamilron, Mar· "Under what circumsrnnccs may an anorney cd1ically represent both the driver of ion County, AlabJm> , wa~,u,pcndc,I an auromobilc ond the driver's passenger in a lawsuit against the driver of anod1er from the practice or law fur a period vdlide involved in an accidcntl" of 30 days, without aurnm,ti c rcinsnm,mcm, by an Ordernfd1c Su­ preme O,un oC:.\bbama dattd J•nn· ~ SWER: ary 3. 1983. The dfccri, e d,uc of .aid An attomcy m,y with cmical propriety represent both the driver and the passcngcr su5pcnsion being December l2 , in a lawsuit against the driver of another vehicle in,'Olvedin an accidcm if ( I) the 1982. Mr. Creel h.id pkd guih:y to attomcy is convinced, •ftcr investigating all ofd1c facts, duttherc is no possibilityof ,•iol.tnng Oooplin•ry Rule 2· 10 l(A) lio.bilityon the pan of the driver and (2) if the rcprcscnttrion is undertaken with the of die C,odc of Profc<.

TINAl a/,,,ma J..,,"'F' Il l Old Canon 6, Canons of Professional Ethics of the American Bar Association provided in pertinent part as follows:

k ••• • lawy,,r~resents conflicting inrcresu when, in behalfofone client, it is liis duty to contend for chat which duty to another client requires him to oppose." MAKE PLANS Present DisciplinaryRules 5-105 (A) and (C), Code of ProfessionalResponsibility of the Alabama State Bar provide: NOW TO ATTEND THE "(A) A lawyershall decline profferedcrnplo)"'!cnt if the exerciseof ALABAMA hi>indcpcndrot professionalJudgment in behalfof a clicnr\\~IIbe or is likely to be acfrcrsclvaffected b)' the acceptanceof the proffered STATE BAR employment, or ifit would be likcly ro involve him in representing dilfcring interests, except to the extent pcm1ittcd under DR S•I 05 (C). ANNUAL MEETING

(C) In the simarions covered by DR 5· 1OS (A) nnd (B), • lawyer may represcnr multiple clients ifl1c reasonably dctcm1incs thar he can adequately represent the interest of cad, and if each consents to rcptcscmation alicr full disclosure of the possible effect of such JULY 21-23 rcercscmation on the exercise of his independent professional jU

Opinions of various ethics committees arc not entirely consistent in thcir ap· proachcs to this question. Some ethics committees have r:akcnthe position that under no circumstancescan an attorney represent both thcdri,•crand the passengerinvolved in an accidcm. North Carolina State Bar ( 1956), New Jersey Bar ( 1970). Perhaps n greater mm,bcr of ethics committ('CShave held that, under certain circumstances,an attorney may represent both thcdrivcrand the passenger•gaiost the other parry in\'Ol\'cdin an automobile accident. A digest of an opinion of the Ethics Commince of die Maryland State Bar Association ( 196 I) provides as follows:

"An anomey mar simultaneouslyrepresent both a passengerand driver in an automobile accidentC\JSC only if ( I ) he is convincedafter thorough in,·cstigarionthar 1.he dri,•er is so dc-arlyfree of negligence thar he would win on summaryjudgment in advanceof trial were rhe passenger ro sue the driver (2) lx1tli parties consent after fulld isclo· sure, whicl, includes as an cxplananon that if an actual conflict of interest arises, d1e attorney will hnvc to cc;iscrepresentation of both parties."

New Format • Obtain CLE Credit Sec also opinions of the following Bar Associations: Louisiam Stare Bar ( 1964); New York County Bar Ass(lciation( L966); New York State Bar Assodation ( 19n ). 1st Session Thursday Moming Cctttin ethics committee$ have held that a bwycr who 3CCeptSemployment from the dri,-cr and his passenger in an automobile accidcni c.ssc,believing ar the time thar the driver cannot have been contributory negligem, must withdraw from the case entirely when od1cr evidence poinis to contributory negligence by the drivc.r. New York County Bar AssociationOpinion S2 I ( 1964); Oregon State Bar Associ'1tion75 {1959). ln summary, we believe that an attorney can with ethical propriCI)' represent both the driver nnd the p:isscngcr under the circumSCtnces hcrcinabovc described. D

Ill The Final Judgment

cally committ ed to suppo rr Senator Strom Thurmond of Soutll Carolina, although actually they hoped co control the entire election ifit was very dose. On the nigl1t following dle election about 2 A.M., d1e race between President Robert Bynum Albritton Truman and 111o n1as E. Dewey was practically even on a count of potential 1905-1983 elecroral votes. It appeared for a period of several hours rhar the Alabama Dele­ gation would possibly be in a position to bargain witll other e.leccors and control the nomination o f the president of the United States. But alas, when the sun rose o n the moming following d1e elec­ tion, President Tmman took a substan­ Robert Bynum Albritton of An­ Dclra Phi Legal Fratern ity and a member tial and decisive lead in the election and dalusia, Alabama, died Tanuary 19, 1983, of the President' s Cabinet at tllc Univer­ the hopes of Bob and the od1er Alabama at d1e age of seventy-seven. sity of Alabama. Also he was a member electors were gone-likewise die pre· Mr. Albritton, known co his many of Kappa Sigma F ratemity, Alabama mature headline of the Chicago Tribune friends and acquaintances as Bob, was Law I.nstitute and Farrah Law Society. declaring Dewey the winner became a born February 1, 1905, in Andalusia. He Bob loved rhe University of Alabama world famous blooper . Bob loved to cell was the son of d1e lace Mr. and Mrs. Law School and served as a member of d1is story of the '+8 election. William Harold Albritton , Sr. and was a tlle Univers ity of Alabama Law Scl1ool Bob>ss urvivors arc his ,vife, Carrie; life-long resident of Andalusia. Fonndation. his son, W. Haro ld Albritton, 111;a nd He was educattrl in die public scl1ools Bob's family to date has five genera­ three grandchildren-H al, who is in law of Andalusia and received his prepara­ tions of lawyers. His grandfadler, Judge scllool at the University of Alabama; tory education and legal education at the EdgarT. Albritton, moved to Andalusia Beo, who is a jun io r at the Unive.rsity of University of Alabama, graduati ng in from Norm Carolina in the 188o's and Alabama in Birmingham; and Tom, who law in 1930 and was admitted to the Ala­ formed a partnership with d1e late Dem­ is a srudent at Andalusia Hig h Se11ool. ban1a Bar the same year. Bob was a dea­ psey M. Powell of Greenville, Alabama, Two of his brothers , W. H . A.lbtitton, con in the First Presbyterian Church in whom he met at a circus in Greenville, Jr. and J. M. Albritton , arc members of Andalusia and served as city attorney for Alabama. Bob's fadter, William Harold die fim, of Albrittons and Givhan, Bob's the City of Andalusia for some seventeen Albritto n, Sr., practiced law in d1e firm Andalusia firm, and are in active practice years. He was a former president of the until his death in 1929and Bob's son, W. in Andalusia now. His other brod1ers are Covingto n County Bar Association Haro ld Albritton , Lil, has been practic­ John l11omas Albritton of Andalusia, dttring the period of 197i-;•z. He was an ing law in the firm in Andalusia since Col. Jesse T. Albritto n of Mob ile, and active Rotarian and was past president of 1960. 11,e fifth generatio n ofd1e Albrit­ Dempsey P. Albritton of Brewton. His d1e Andalusia Ro tary Club. He was ton Attorneys is Bob's gcandsoo who is one sister is Mrs. Mary Caba niss of chairman of tlle Committ ee on Revision now in law scl1ool at d1e Un iversity of Manilus, New York. of the AJaban1aProbate Code, a member Alabama. We mourn the passing of a gre at of the Alabama Defense Lawyers Asso­ lawyer who practiced for some fifty-two ciation, Association of Insurance Attor ­ In the 1948 presidential election, Bob years and will always remember him as a neys, American Judicat ure So ciet y, was duly elected as a member of the ttue friend. World Association of Lawyers and was a Electo ral College from Alabama. All Fellow in the American College of Pro­ d1e~e AJaban,a electors were very con­ bate Counsel. Bob was a member of Phi servative Dcmocrarsa nd ,vere tech1U- -Almer R. Po1vell,Jr.

IIJ W. M. Pitts G. M. Grant G. 0. Miller, Jr. William McLean Pi1ts died w1cxpcc· Geo rge Mclnvnlc Granr, former George Oliver Mill er, Jr. of rnncly ar his home in Sel ma on United States Rcprcscur:itivc from the Montgomery died on November 11 , Novcmberu, 1982. Hcwnsscvcnty-Qnc. srare or Alabama , died in early 1982. He was sixty-eight. Mr. Pirrs, known to friends as"Mac,• November 1982 of a hart arta.ck while Mr. •"liUcr was bom on December13, mended me Uoi,>crsity or Alabama Law returning from Europe aboa rd the 1913in Linden, Alabama to L:lncllc and School and was admitted 10 the praaicc Quun Elizabet/, IJ. He was cighty•6\'C George 0 . Miller , Sr. of nearb y or law in Alabama in 1933,Upon admit· yearsold. Livingston. ffis father, also an attorney, ranee ro the bar, he began praaicing Mr. Grant was born in Loujsvillc, served as a commissioner to thesratc bar. with his f:tthcr, Arthur M . Pins. Mr. Afabama. He attcodcd the Un iversity of Mr . Miller moved widi his family to t'irts managed this extensive lnw practice Abbanla and, after serving in die Army Montgomery during his teenage years in &Ima wuil his rcccnr dcnth . Signal Corps during World War r, he and fini$hcd high schoo l at Sidney Duringhislawcarccr,Mr. Pittsscrvcd graduated fi-omme University of Ala­ L.111icr.He graduated f'rom the Uni,·cr· for KVC:r.al)".Iagent of die bama School ofLaw. The )'car was 1922. siry or Alabama School of law aud was Fcdcnl Bureau of Investigation. For Mr . Grant practiced Jaw m Troy, Ab­ adntltced to the Abbanta State Bar in cigh1ccn yearshe represented the mayor bamn where he served os Pike County 1939. l.ikc mosr men his age, the U. S. nnd governing body of the city of Soliciro r from 1917-,7. He wos cl1ainrnui Army claimed him ii1 19+2a nd from ,hat Sc.Lmn-rJ,ccity he wns born in andspc n r of the Pike Cow1ty Democratic Eiceru- date until 194s he was no srrang<,r ro the rcm:tindn of his life. He was a combat in the European theatre. 1ive Committee (1927-1938), and was a member of the DallasCounty, Alabama, member or the Srate Dcmocntic Excru­ ln 1948 Miller bcame the fu:sr and, :andAmcric:an Bar Associations. tive Committee. ,\u. Grant alsoserved :u until bis n:rircmcnt in Janiwy 198n, the The contributions or Mr. Pins to die State Commander of the American only acromcy for the Abbama Dcpan­ Dallas County Bar, to his chosen career, Legion (1929-30). mcnr or Agriculture and lndusaics. and ro his community arcdistinguished and numero us. As an active member of As a member of die United States Mr. Miller was ncrive in rhc Alabama die Alabama State 1hr, Mr . PittS served House of Representatives, Mr . Grant Porro Burc.:iu Pcdcrnrion, die Alabama on the .Board of Commissioners for represented the state of Abbama from Cartlcmcn's Associarion, the: American twcnry·fourconsecutive y<-:u-s.l:le was 1938 through 196+-There he served on Legion, the V etcrans of Foreign Wan , me commissioner fi-omme fourth judi­ the Committee of Agriculture. Mer his and or the Oovcrdtle B•ptist Olurch. cial circuit from 1!1,46-1970. congressio nal service Mr . Granr re­ Those who knew and worked with Mr . Pirrs was respected and admired sumed me practice of law in Washing ­ George Miller admired him. He was a by chose he represented and diosc who ron, O.C. fine gentlema n and followed the rules of knew him because of his dedication ro He is Sut\~vcd by his wife, NaraLie courtesy a11dkind regnrd for his feUow his calling and his family. C:irtcr Grant of Washington; a son, attorney. His wise counsel was often Surviving family members include his George MdnvaJe Grant, Jr. of Oicvy soug ht by those he had worked wirh , widow, Mrs . Mary H . Pirrs ; his O,asc, Maryland; a daughter, Alicia even after rusrrorcmcnr, and it was gra­ d.iughrcrs, Mn. Weir Alexander, ,\>lrs. Longwell of Brookl yn, New York; and ciouslygi, ·cn. John Henry, Miss Mary M. Piru; his duce grandchildren. He is olso survived Sympadiy is expressed ro his ";f c, son, Phillip Henry Piw ; and nine grand­ by a brother, B. M. Grant, orLowsville, Gloria Unde rwood Miller , and their cliildrcn. Alaban,a. many friends.

NAME CITY DATB OP DEATH These notices arc published immediately A.l.BRllTON, Rohen B)'llUm Ancblusfa January 19, 11)83 after rcporrs or dc:ith arc received. GI I.ES, Robcn Oinron, Jr. Mountain Brook December u, 11)82 Memorials not appearing in this issue MAXWELL, Albert Russell, Jr. Elberton, Ga. December 23, 11)82 will be published at a later date if infor­ SMITH, John Alcxnndcr, Jr. Fayette January 2s, 11)83 mation is accessible. WAID, Luther Pinkney. Jr. Oneonta December s, 1982 ... ~lassified ~otices

conlpure,r assistance.Air Brake0:>ru'U ltants, miscellaneous Inc., Prof. Robert MacRac (Physics), P.O . Box 1163, Anniston, Alabama36102.. Phone AU requests for classified notices must be DOWNTOWN BIRMINGHAM OF­ (20;) 236-)260. .sub1nittcdtypC\vrittcn and arc subjectto FICE SPACE. Rceemly renovated historic approval. Cl<1Ssificdads must be prepaid. building. Torte thousand square feet avail­ ~on~me,nbcr advctti.scrs ,viii receive 3 able. Within two blocks of Federal and Smee complimentary co py of The Alnbnmn Courts. Interior design to tenant's spccif­ LaTpYn· foUowing publicarion. Additional ia tions. Second lloor ava.ilablc. Coneact copic.~arc $3.00, plus _posragc. Dovid D. Wininger , Jll -3663.

ALABAMA LAWYER BINDERS. A books for sale handso n1e brown , leather-look binde r wW hold your six issues of The Alnbnmn ui,ryer FOR SALB: Federal ul; Federal Supp .; Su · CLASSIFIED RAT.ES securely for easy referenceand storage. TI1c prcmc Court Rpt. L.E.; Am. Jur. ul; Trials; (20s) 269-1s1s front cover and spine of the binder has 1"/Je Legal ul ; Proof of F•c:cs; ALR 1, 2, 3; Fed. Alabama UJTpYN' impr imcd on it with gold Digest 2d; FR.D's. AU law books sol d , Non -members of rhc Alabam• State lettering. This binder is specially made to bought , and traded. Scotsman l..:lwBooks , Bar: organize and prcsc,rvc your joun1al,vi thout Inc., P.O . Box +7S2, Austin , Texas 78765. S30.oo per insertionof 50 ,vords qr less punching holes in it. Order by sendin g $6.so Phone (; 12) +H · no1. S.;o per additional word to The Alabama Lawyer Binders, P.O. Box +1s6, Montgomery , Alabama 36101. Mcmbccs of the A.bbama State Bar: FOR SALE: Avcrbadl's Handling Accident No charge for classified ad placement Cases, 19n, Vol . 1-1; Lindcy's Scpar•tio n & Ante-Nuptial Concraas , • vols.; Murphy's WiU ClaLL~, 19n, 3 vols.; AmJurT rials, 28 vols. + lndex; Attorney,s Textbook of Medicine,1976 , n \'Ols.+ 2 vol. index; AmJur Legal Forms 2d, 22 vols. + 1981 Federal Tax DEADLINES Guide to Legal Forms ; Amjur Pleading & November rs (January Issue) services Practice. forms , 1.7 vols. + 2 vol. index; January rs (March Issue) Amjur ProofofFac:cs (,-30) andAmJur Proof March I) (May Issue) CUMBERLAND LEGAL R..eSEARCH ofFactS id (r-32) + 1982Quick Index. Excel• May 15(July 1.ssue) PROGRAM: 11,e ()imberla nd Research lent condition. Contll Ct Horace G. Williams, July rs (September Issue) Bo.mtolfcrs members of the Alabama Bar an P.O. Box +99, Euf.tula , Alabama 36027. Scprcmbcr 1.1( November Issue) oppomm ity to obtain assistance in legalre­ Phone 6Sn834. SC1rch projeas for a minimum fee of Sw.oo per mernorandwn or Sro.oo per page. Generally, at leastfour weeks arc n«dcd to oon1plctca proj· FOR SALE: Rabkin & Johnson Curren t ca. Formore infoonation , pk:aseconcaa Vau· Legal Fo rms with Tax Analysis, Complete 22 ghn Stewart, Rcse:irch Director, ()imbcdand volume sct l good as nc,v) includes all sup­ Research Board, Ctunbcrland School of Low, plemental releases thru August 1981. If in­ MAILING INFORMATION Soc Lakcshorc Drive, Binuingham, Alobam.1 terested call (20)) 328-0..So, .E.ltt.6;, or 879· Please send dassiftcd oopy and payment 35229.Phone 870-2714, c.,t. 1. 7986. to; The Alabama Lawyer Classifieds TRAIN SPEED STOPPING DIS­ FOR SALB: A.L.R. 3d; U.S.CA.; U.S . Su­ P.O. Box +1J6 TANCE . Expert testimony on stopping preme Court Rcpons L.'Ed. ConeaccThomas Montgomery , AL 36101 distances and speed of traios equipped wicl, i'vt. Sc0\lncs, +2.0S no\V Srrccr,Oxford , AL air brakes. Computed with certa inty with 36203. Phone 83,-6730.

Tlte A/abn,1111Uln,ytr "l Oient-attomey brochures are availablefrom the Alabama State Bar at a cost of $5.00 per hundred. Subjects indude: LastWill and Testament, Conswncr Finance or"Buying on Time", Lawyersand LegalFees, How to Adopt a Quid in Alabama, Tips on Buying a Home, and Your Legal R.ighrsWhen Disaster Strikes. For samples of these brochures, or to make your order, write or caU: et cetera The Alabama State Bar P. 0. Box 67L Montgomery, AL 36101 Tcleplione: 269-1515

lf you have recently moved and have not notified the state bar of your move, plc:ascmake sure you do so immt-dfately.Mailin gs from the bar are very important, and mostaresentata bulk rate and are not returned with address changes. Tile Alabama Lawyer is sent free of d1arge to all members of the bar from the same list used for other mailings. If the reason you have not r<."Ceivedyour copy of d1ebar journal is chat you have neglected ro change your address with the srntebar, the second copy will cost $3.00, plus postage. Please, make address changes when you move.

TheA/11b11111aLa1vyerwould like to apologi1.cfor the error made in the list of the new admittees co the bar, Fall 1982. Mark Sl.-ymourBoardman ofBimungham was admitted; however, he was listed as Mary Seymour Boardman. Oops, we're sorry Mark!

Those wishin_gco order group pictures of die Fall 1982 bar admittecs, or die fumil)'.p1crures, may do so by contactin_gScott Photograpllic Services, P. 0. Box 1361, 4.58S. McDonough Street, Montgomery, Alabama 36102.Phone 262--8761.

Admittecs to the Bar December 1982

B.,1,1,yK,U Amy • • • ". • ...... FumiJn,,, uny &Ltn H,_ .. • . .. • .. . • .. . • .• Hwu." k )<,Im - .. • • • • • • .. • • • • Bummglum ~.. 11• .,,.._ Ir ...... Jxbmmk Lym l. llwl< • • • ...... Blffllllll!h,m .. .,. Cal Jc,o-dl • • • ...... • Ed>d><>lt µam l'lul,p - • • •• ••• •• .. .. - I« "·"'" umpcy...... IINnd,dg, P•ul T Rn,,n, ...... • ...... Toocy c.,t, ~l<0,"'4 M,n"' ·•...... •• . .. ,-,. ~ C a.-,• ...... ~- \\ ",li,m Gndy Nc,bn • • ·- ... a.....,giw., Mom E. Coen . • .. • • • .. • • Mooik M,lp, loo

116 ;\fnrrJ, 1931 LEGAL PRINTING

~ Legal and Financial Printers Since 1910 Exp erienced , Dep enda ble , Res pon sibl e, Co nfiden tial Prospectuses, Proxy Statements, Official Statements, Tender Offers, Indentures and Briefs

BIRMIN GHAM PUBLISHING COMPANY 130 Sout h 19th Street Birmingham , Alabama 35233 Te lephon e: 205/251-5113 Co nt act: Harold Fult on, Vice President UPCOMING Alabama Non-ProHIOrganliatlon {;JI.'; U $ POSTAGE PAID 1983 r;yer Pem,rt No. 125 Monl9D"*)', Ala. 36104 May~ Bollrdol CommluionersMeedng. Gu~ Slio

TUES WED THURS WED Avoiding Logel Avokflng Legal Avoiding Lego! Sou1heas1ern Trial Workmen's Malprao1ice, MaJprru,tice. Malpractice. tnstilUle, Coml*IS"llon. Birmingham Montgomery Andalusia Birmingham Blrmlngham (ABICLE) (ABICI.E) (ABICLE) (ABICl:E) (ADIA)

FRI 4 WED 9 TUES 7 FRI 8 THURS 14 Avodlr>g Logal BankroOLaw . ~ ~-Race~Sox Bim*,ghatn ... Oiscrimlnallon, ~-Mobile( ABICLE) (ABICU:) ~ Blrm~ ~=~SexMobile lor May (ABICU:) (Alllct.EJ Federal PniC1lce. Alabama Bfrmlngham( ABICLE) Lawyer

SAT 19 FRI 25 15 FederalA ulos ol New Probate Code, Criminal Procedure. Civil Prooeduro. Birmingham(ABICLE) ll

THURS 5 FRI 6 FRI SAT THURS 19 FRI 20 8oald ot Boatd ol Alabama Young Alabama Young Medlcal Medical Commlsslonert Commlssione,s Lawyers. Lawyers. MBlfJfecllce, Ma11)<8Ctlce. Mealing, Mee ling, Sandostln Sandeslin Blrmingham Birmingham (CICLE) Gulf Stio