DOCSLIB.ORG

Preparation of Studies (FS, EIA, CBA), Design Documentation and Tender

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Preparation of Studies (FS, EIA, CBA), Design Documentation and Tender Preparation of Studies (FS, EIA, CBA), Design documentation and tender Dossiers for Waste Water Collection and Treatment Investment Projects in the Municipalities of Strumica, Bitola and Tetovo ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY PROJECT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A COLLECTION SYSTEM, REHABILITATIONS OF THE SEWERAGE NETWORK AND CONSTRUCTION OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT IN BITOLA March, 2017 Study on Environmental Impact Assessment for construction of a collection system, rehabilitations of the sewerage NIRAS/JOD/JBB network and construction of wastewater treatment plant in Bitola GENERAL DATA Type of Document: Environmental Impact Assessment Study Project: Construction of a collection system, rehabilitations of the sewerage network and construction of wastewater treatment plant in Bitola Date of Drafting: March, 2017 Competent Authority: Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning Person responsible for drafting the document Name and Surname: Marjan Mihajlov, M.Sc. in Environmental Sciences Expert on Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Signature: Participants in the drafting Name and Surname: Josif Milevski, water management Tome Lisičanec, biodiversity D-r Dejan Mirakovski, odour management Viktor Hristov, waste management Nadežda Popova, environmental management Fana Hristovska, environmental management M-r Aleksandra Angjeleska 2 of 191 Study on Environmental Impact Assessment for construction of a collection system, rehabilitations of the sewerage NIRAS/JOD/JBB network and construction of wastewater treatment plant in Bitola Contents LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................................................ 9 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................................... 11 1.1 GOAL OF EIA ......................................................................................................................................................................... 12 2 ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK .............................................................................................. 13 2.1 ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK ......................................................................................................................................... 13 2.2 LEGAL FRAMEWORK ............................................................................................................................................................ 14 2.3 EIA PROCESS ......................................................................................................................................................................... 20 2.3 METHODOLOGY OF WORK ................................................................................................................................................... 23 2.4 PARTICIPATION OF THE PUBLIC ......................................................................................................................................... 24 2.5 LIABILITY IN CASE OF DAMAGE .......................................................................................................................................... 26 2.6 FURTHER PROJECT ACTIVITIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LEGISLATION ON ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES ............... 28 3 DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVE FORMS FOR PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION ................................... 29 3.1 „ZERO” ALTERNATIVE ......................................................................................................................................................... 29 3.2 LOCATION ASPECTS .............................................................................................................................................................. 30 3.3 TECHNOLOGICAL ASPECTS .................................................................................................................................................. 34 3.3.1 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED ........................................................................................................................................ 34 3.3.1.1 ALTERNATIVES FOR THE COLLECTION AND SEWAGE NETWORKS ........................................................................... 34 3.3.1.2 PROCESS ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED ........................................................................................................................ 41 3.3.2 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES .............................................................................................................................................. 46 3.4 DO NOTHING ALTERNATIVE ................................................................................................................................................ 54 2. PROJECT DESCRIPITON AND PROJECT FEATURES .................................................................................... 55 4.1 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT SITE .................................................................................................................................. 55 4.1.1 PROJECT SCOPE ..................................................................................................................................................................... 55 4.1.2 PROJECT DURATION ............................................................................................................................................................. 55 4.1.3 DESCRIPTION OF THE WWTP MACROLOCATION ........................................................................................................... 55 4.1.4 DESCRIPTION OF THE WWTP MICROLOCATION ............................................................................................................ 56 4.2 TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT ..................................................................................................................... 60 4.2.1 DESCRIPTION OF THE SEWERAGE SYSTEM SOLUTIONS................................................................................................... 60 4.2.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE WWTP ........................................................................................................................................... 63 5 BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITION IN THE PROJECT AREA ....................................................... 71 5.1 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION ...................................................................................................................................................... 71 5.2 CLIMATIC FEATURES ............................................................................................................................................................ 72 5.3 GEOLOGICAL FEATURES ....................................................................................................................................................... 74 5.4 SEISMIC FEATURES ............................................................................................................................................................... 76 5.5 HYDROLOGICAL FEATURES ................................................................................................................................................. 77 5.6 TOPOGRAPHY, SOILS AND LAND ......................................................................................................................................... 81 5.7 WASTE MANAGEMENT ........................................................................................................................................................ 83 5.8 AIR QUALITY ......................................................................................................................................................................... 87 5.9 NOISE ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 90 5.10 LANDSCAPE, BIODIVERSITY AND NATURAL HERITAGE ................................................................................................... 93 5.10.1 LANDSCAPE FEATURES ................................................................................................................................................... 93 5.10.2 BIODIVERSITY OF THE WWTP SURROUNDINGS ........................................................................................................ 97 5.10.3 IMPORTANT HABITATS AND SPECIES ........................................................................................................................... 98 5.10.4 AREAS IN THE WIDER WWTP ENVIRONMENT .......................................................................................................... 98 3 of 191 Study on Environmental Impact Assessment for construction of a collection system, rehabilitations of the sewerage NIRAS/JOD/JBB network and construction of wastewater treatment plant in Bitola 5.11 WATER QUALITY ................................................................................................................................................................ 103 5.12 SOCIAL SITUATION AND SOCIAL CIRCUMSTANCES ......................................................................................................... 107 5.12.1 DEMOGRAPHIC PROPERTIES........................................................................................................................................ 107 5.12.2
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Acrocephalus, 2010, Letnik 31, Številka
    Acrocephalus 31 (147): 175−179, 2010 A Milestone on the Road to Natura 2000 Mejnik na poti k Naturi 2000 The publication “Important Bird Areas of Macedonia: Sites of Global and European Importance” provides a fascinating insight into the natural and cultural heritage of the country. The approved list of sites now includes a wide variety of landscapes hosting bird species that have become rare or threatened in many parts of Europe. Very important is the fact that only about 21% of the national protected area network overlaps the Important Bird Areas of Macedonia. Now an assessment of the natural assets of Macedonia is available for the first time, based on a systematic approach using the international criteria developed by BirdLife International for the selection of sites under the EU Birds Directive. The first results indicate where the country hosts areas of European and even global importance, where urgent conservation measures are needed, and are excellent guidelines for the rural development and tourism. A wide range of political commitments within the European Union is aimed at preserving ecosystems and biodiversity, with various species protection provisions as well as Special Protection Areas (SPAs) identified under the Birds Directive and Sites of Community Importance (SCIs) identified under the Habitats Directive, both incorporated into the Natura 2000 (N2000) network. The publication of the “Important Bird Areas of Macedonia” prepared by the Macedonian Ecological Society (MES) as a national representative of the BirdLife International’s partnership is the first systematic assessment of Macedonia’s sites based on the internationally recognized criteria to implement the Birds Directive.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Methodology and Protocols for 20 Habitats, 20 Species and 20 Birds
    1 Finnish Environment Institute SYKE, Finland Monitoring methodology and protocols for 20 habitats, 20 species and 20 birds Twinning Project MK 13 IPA EN 02 17 Strengthening the capacities for effective implementation of the acquis in the field of nature protection Report D 3.1. - 1. 7.11.2019 Funded by the European Union The Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning, Department of Nature, Republic of North Macedonia Metsähallitus (Parks and Wildlife Finland), Finland The State Service for Protected Areas (SSPA), Lithuania 2 This project is funded by the European Union This document has been produced with the financial support of the European Union. Its contents are the sole responsibility of the Twinning Project MK 13 IPA EN 02 17 and and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union 3 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Summary 6 Overview 8 Establishment of Natura 2000 network and the process of site selection .............................................................. 9 Preparation of reference lists for the species and habitats ..................................................................................... 9 Needs for data .......................................................................................................................................................... 9 Protocols for the monitoring of birds ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Aromanians in Macedonia
    Macedonian Historical Review 3 (2012) Македонска историска ревија 3 (2012) EDITORIAL BOARD: Boban PETROVSKI, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Macedonia (editor-in-chief) Nikola ŽEŽOV, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Macedonia Dalibor JOVANOVSKI, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Macedonia Toni FILIPOSKI, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Macedonia Charles INGRAO, Purdue University, USA Bojan BALKOVEC, University of Ljubljana,Slovenia Aleksander NIKOLOV, University of Sofia, Bulgaria Đorđe BUBALO, University of Belgrade, Serbia Ivan BALTA, University of Osijek, Croatia Adrian PAPAIANI, University of Elbasan, Albania Oliver SCHMITT, University of Vienna, Austria Nikola MINOV, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Macedonia (editorial board secretary) ISSN: 1857-7032 © 2012 Faculty of Philosophy, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Skopje, Macedonia University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius - Skopje Faculty of Philosophy Macedonian Historical Review vol. 3 2012 Please send all articles, notes, documents and enquiries to: Macedonian Historical Review Department of History Faculty of Philosophy Bul. Krste Misirkov bb 1000 Skopje Republic of Macedonia http://mhr.fzf.ukim.edu.mk/ [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS 7 Nathalie DEL SOCORRO Archaic Funerary Rites in Ancient Macedonia: contribution of old excavations to present-day researches 15 Wouter VANACKER Indigenous Insurgence in the Central Balkan during the Principate 41 Valerie C. COOPER Archeological Evidence of Religious Syncretism in Thasos, Greece during the Early Christian Period 65 Diego PEIRANO Some Observations about the Form and Settings of the Basilica of Bargala 85 Denitsa PETROVA La conquête ottomane dans les Balkans, reflétée dans quelques chroniques courtes 95 Elica MANEVA Archaeology, Ethnology, or History? Vodoča Necropolis, Graves 427a and 427, the First Half of the 19th c.
    [Show full text]
  • P R O C E E D I N G S
    GOCE DELCEV UNIVERSITY OF STIP FACULTY OF TOURISM AND BUSINESS LOGISTICS FACULTY OF TOURISM P R O C E E D I N G S THE 2 ND INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE CHALLENGES OF TOURISM AND BUSINESS LOGISTICS IN T H E 2 1 ST CENTURY S tip, September 13 th, 2 0 1 9 North Macedonia Publisher: Faculty of Tourism and Business logistics Goce Delcev University of Stip “Krste Misirkov” no.10-A P.O. Box 201 Stip 2000, North Macedonia Tel: +389 32 550 350 www.ftbl.ugd.edu.mk www.ugd.edu.mk For the Publisher: Nikola V. Dimitrov, Ph.D. – Dean Technical Support Cvetanka Ristova, M.Sc., University Teaching Assistant, Goce Delcev University of Stip, Faculty of Tourism and Business logistics, Stip, North Macedonia Conference organizer Goce Delcev University of Stip, Faculty of Tourism and Business logistics Co-organizers: - St. Clement of Ohrid University of Bitola, Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality, Ohrid, North Macedonia - University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Hotel Management and Tourism in Vrnjačka Banja, Serbia - St. Cyril and Methodius University of Skopje, Institute of Geography, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Skopje, North Macedonia - Konstantin Preslavsky University of Shumen, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Department of Geography, regional development and tourism, Shumen, Bulgaria - University Haxhi Zeka, Faculty of Management in Tourism, Hotels and the Environment, Peć, Kosovo - Singidunum University, Faculty of Applied Ecology Futura, Belgrade, Serbia - Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece CIP - Каталогизација во публикација Национална и универзитетска библиотека Св. „Климент Охридски“, Скопје 338.48(062) INTERNATIONAL scientific conference "Challenges of tourism and business logistics in the 21st century, ISCTBL (2 ; 2019 ; Stip) Proceedings / Second international scientific conference "Challenges of tourism and business logistics in 21st century, ISCTBL, Stip, September 13th, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Esc Digital Competencies 4
    L O N G T E R M E S C P R O J E C T D I G I T A L C O M P E T E N C I E S 4 A L L 1 A U G U S T 2 0 2 1 - 3 0 T H M A R C H 2 0 2 2 B I T O L A , N O R T H M A C E D O N I A PROJECT DESCRIPTION The aim of this project is to provide young people belonging to marginalized groups, living in rural areas, facing economic difficulties and are at risk of poverty, from the Bitola region in North Macedonia, with basic digital skills and competencies through tailor-made educational workshops, based on The European Digital Competence Framework for Citizens 2.0, implemented by 2 international volunteers. Another aim of this project is to promote solidarity as a value, mainly through volunteering, to enhance the engagement of young people and organizations in accessible and high-quality solidarity activities as a means to contribute to strengthening cohesion, solidarity, democracy and citizenship in Europe, while also responding to societal challenges and strengthening communities, with particular effort to promote social inclusion. It shall also contribute to European cooperation that is relevant to young people. PARTNERS Stichting UcDean - Netherlands MTU EESTI AVATUD NOORTEKESKUSTE UHENDUS - Estonia SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES - Promoting solidarity and active participation of youth in society through voluntary activities helping other youth who arefacing difficulties - Enhanced intercultural awareness and improve the language skills of volunteers by bringing a group of young people towork together on a project.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Basis of Article 65 of the Law on Real Estate Cadastre („Official Gazette of Republic of Macedonia”, No
    On the basis of article 65 of the Law on Real Estate Cadastre („Official Gazette of Republic of Macedonia”, no. 55/13), the Steering Board of the Agency for Real Estate Cadastre has enacted REGULATION FOR THE MANNER OF CHANGING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CADASTRE MUNICIPALITIES AND FOR DETERMINING THE CADASTRE MUNICIPALITIES WHICH ARE MAINTAINED IN THE CENTER FOR REC SKOPJE AND THE SECTORS FOR REAL ESTATE CADASTRE IN REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA Article 1 This Regulation hereby prescribes the manner of changing the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities, as well as the determining of the cadastre municipalities which are maintained in the Center for Real Estate Cadastre – Skopje and the Sectors for Real Estate Cadastre in Republic of Macedonia. Article 2 (1) For the purpose of changing the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities, the Government of Republic of Macedonia shall enact a decision. (2) The decision stipulated in paragraph (1) of this article shall be enacted by the Government of Republic of Macedonia at the proposal of the Agency for Real Estate Cadastre (hereinafter referred to as: „„the Agency„„). (3) The Agency is to submit the proposal stipulated in paragraph (2) of this article along with a geodetic report for survey of the boundary line, produced under ex officio procedure by experts employed at the Agency. Article 3 (1) The Agency is to submit a proposal decision for changing the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities in cases when, under a procedure of ex officio, it is identified that the actual condition/status of the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities is changed and does not comply with the boundaries drawn on the cadastre maps.
    [Show full text]
  • The War to End War — the Great War
    GO TO MASTER INDEX OF WARFARE GIVING WAR A CHANCE, THE NEXT PHASE: THE WAR TO END WAR — THE GREAT WAR “They fight and fight and fight; they are fighting now, they fought before, and they’ll fight in the future.... So you see, you can say anything about world history.... Except one thing, that is. It cannot be said that world history is reasonable.” — Fyodor Mikhaylovich Dostoevski NOTES FROM UNDERGROUND “Fiddle-dee-dee, war, war, war, I get so bored I could scream!” —Scarlet O’Hara “Killing to end war, that’s like fucking to restore virginity.” — Vietnam-era protest poster HDT WHAT? INDEX THE WAR TO END WAR THE GREAT WAR GO TO MASTER INDEX OF WARFARE 1851 October 2, Thursday: Ferdinand Foch, believed to be the leader responsible for the Allies winning World War I, was born. October 2, Thursday: PM. Some of the white Pines on Fair Haven Hill have just reached the acme of their fall;–others have almost entirely shed their leaves, and they are scattered over the ground and the walls. The same is the state of the Pitch pines. At the Cliffs I find the wasps prolonging their short lives on the sunny rocks just as they endeavored to do at my house in the woods. It is a little hazy as I look into the west today. The shrub oaks on the terraced plain are now almost uniformly of a deep red. HDT WHAT? INDEX THE WAR TO END WAR THE GREAT WAR GO TO MASTER INDEX OF WARFARE 1914 World War I broke out in the Balkans, pitting Britain, France, Italy, Russia, Serbia, the USA, and Japan against Austria, Germany, and Turkey, because Serbians had killed the heir to the Austrian throne in Bosnia.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Six: Complex Identities
    421 Chapter Six: Complex Identities THE MACEDONIAN EXPERIENCE of the late nineteenth century was not merely Christian and European. To this point we have assumed populations that were relatively homogenous in their ethnic, occupational and religious character. However, nineteenth century Macedonians were rather more diverse than these categories would suggest. A significant minority of the population (perhaps 10-15 per cent) were Turkish Muslims or Macedonian Muslims. The slow process of an evolving Macedonian identity was made the more complicated by these alternative realities. 6.1 Contrast between typical Macedonian Muslim village (Reka district) and typical Macedonian Christian village (Bitola region) Churches and mosques CHURCHES WERE FOUND throughout the Dolna Reka Christian villages. Some were hundreds of years old, such as the church in Gari built in the thirteenth century. Churches generally remained standing in mixed Macedonian Christian - Macedonian Muslim villages. However, in the case of Rostusha, the fifteenth century church Sveti Bogorojca was transformed into a mosque after the partial Islamicisation of the village. In exclusively Macedonian Muslim villages there were few churches standing in 1912. Usually they were left unattended and slowly deteriorated (this could take place over a period of hundreds of years) whilst the fate of others remains unknown. In religiously mixed villages, particularly when the Muslim element was dominant, a mosque was generally constructed in the village. It is not clear whether mosques were
    [Show full text]
  • Heraclea, Pelagonia and Medieval Bitola: an Outline of the Ecclesiastical History (6Th-12Th Century)
    Robert MIHAJLOVSKI Heraclea, Pelagonia and Medieval Bitola: An outline of the ecclesiastical history (6th-12th century) uDK 94:27(497.774)”5/l 1” La Trobe university, Melbourne [email protected] Abstract: Thisstudy presents my long-term field researCh on the Early Christian episCopal seat o f HeraClea LynCestis that was loCated along the anCient Roman Via Egnatia and in the valley o f Pelagonia. 1 disCuss various historiCal sourCes and topography of the region of medieval bishopric o f Pelagonia and Bitola. In addition, I also deal with the Christian Cultural heritage in the region. In this work these approaChes are within the Context o f archaeologiCal, historiCal and eCClesiastiCal investigation in the sites o f anCient HeaClea and modern Bitola. Key words: Heraclea Lyncestis, Pelagonia, Bitola, Prilep, Via Egnatia The Early Christian world on the Balkan Peninsula began to crumble already in the fourth century, with the invasions and migrations of the peoples and tribes. Vizigoths disrupted Balkan urban conditions in 378, the Huns of Atilla ravaged in 447 and Ostrogoths in 479. After the year 500 the disturbing catastrophes included an earthquake in 518, which seriously damaged the urban centers. Then came the Bubonic plague of 541-2, which was a terrible disaster of unprecedented magnitude, and other epidemics and catastrophes, which were recorded in 555, 558, 561, 573, 591 and 599.1 The invasions, epidemics and economic recession badly affected the population and society of the Eastern Roman Empire. Life in Herclea Lynkestis slowly declined. The Episcopal church was rebuilt in the early sixth century when the latest published coins of Justin II are found.
    [Show full text]
  • Sketch P . 334), 338 192 ; Proposed Withdrawal of Greek Troops from , AAMIQ (Sketch P
    INDEX AACHRAFIYE (Sketch p. 416), 41 8 ALBANIA—continued AAL, EL (Sketch p . 334), 338 192 ; proposed withdrawal of Greek troops from , AAMIQ (Sketch p . 516), 53 5 12, 16 ; British air support in, 22-3 ; Italian offensive AANOUT (Sketches pp. 462, 475), 460, 461, 464, 47 5 in, 25 ; proposed Greek-Yugoslav offensive, 26 , AAQLIYE (Map p . 482), 471, 472 27, 40, 41, 43 ; Greek withdrawal, 46, 54, 76-7 , Aba, British hospital ship, 214n 80, 93 ABABY, JEBEL (Sketch p . 381), 383 Alcides, Norwegian tanker, 188 ABADAN (Sketch p . 533), 532 ALCOHOL, 105, 206, 258 ABBOTTSMITH, Sgt J ., 547 ALDRIDGE, Gnr J ., 121, 122 ABD EL KAMH (Sketch p . 353), 35 3 ALEPPO (Map p. 339 ; Sketch p . 478), 327, 330, 331 , Abdiel, British mine-layer, 239, 243, 244, 251n, 305 441, 479, 480, 511, 512, 517, 519, 534, 535, 546 ABDUL ILLAH, AMIR, 19 9 ALEXANDRETTA, 18 8 ABETZ, Otto, 329 ALEXANDRIA (Sketch p . 298), 17, 23, 30, 31, 151, 170, ABEY (Sketches pp . 462, 504), 473, 496, 500, 502, 503 , 174, 177, 202, 211, 227, 238, 239, 243, 251n, 291 , 504, 50 5 292, 298, 302, 305, 306, 311, 318, 320, 513n, 55 9 ABou ATRIZ, JEBEL (Sketch p . 393), 393, 394 ALEY (Sketch p. 504), 480, 53 5 ABou NmA, TEL (Sketch p . 357), 356 ALIAKMON-OLYMPUS LINE, see OLYMPUS-ALIAKMON ABOU ZARE, WADI (Sketch p. 381), 380, 38 5 LINE ABU KEMAL (Sketch p. 478), 479 ALL&KMON RIVER (Map p . 34 ; Sketches pp. 4, 75), 3 , ABYSSINIA, 7, 320, 321n, 334, 342, 441, 529, 555, 562 , 4, 8, 29, 32, 34, 40, 46, 54, 55, 56, 58, 66, 68, 71, 73 , Italian defeat in, 197 ; British army strength in, 53 1 74, 75, 76, 77, 81, 82, 83, 85, 86, 90, 92, 93, 94 , ACRE CONVENTION, 513-14 ; administration of, 515-22 158, 165n ; 19th Brigade crossing, 87-8 9 ACROPOLE PALACE HOTEL, 24, 155 ; site of Lustre ALIKAMBOS (Sketch p.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropogenic Effects on the Human Environment in the Neogene Basins in the Se Europe
    Faculty of Sciences, Institute of Mineralogy and Petrology, University of Zagreb, R. Croatia and Croatian UNESCO-IGCP Committee with a sponsorship from the UNESCO organize 2nd INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON THE PROJECT ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECTS ON THE HUMAN ENVIRONMENT IN THE NEOGENE BASINS IN THE SE EUROPE PROCEEDINGS Edited by: V. Bermanec & T. Serafimovski Zagreb, 6-7 October 2011 2nd INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON THE UNESCO-IGCP PROJECT: “ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECTS ON THE HUMAN ENVIRONMENT IN THE NEOGENE BASINS IN THE SE EUROPE” 6-7th October 2011, Zagreb - Croatia Organizing Committee: Prof. D-r Vladimir Bermanec, President Faculty of Sciences, Institute of Mineralogy and Petrology, University of Zagreb, R. Croatia Prof. D-r Todor Serafimovski Faculty of Natural and Technical Sciences, University “Goce Delčev”-Štip, R. Macedonia Prof. D-r Ladislav Palinkaš Faculty of Sciences, Institute of Mineralogy and Petrology, University of Zagreb, R. Croatia Prof. D-r Goran Kniewald Center for Marine and Environmental Research, Rudjer Bošković Institute, Zagreb, R. Croatia Doc. D-r Sabina Strmić-Palinkaš Faculty of Sciences, Institute of Mineralogy and Petrology, University of Zagreb, R. Croatia Doc. D-r Željka Žigovečki-Gobac Faculty of Sciences, Institute of Mineralogy and Petrology, University of Zagreb, R. Croatia Doc. D-r Marta Mileusnić Faculty of Mining, Geology and Petroleum Engineering, Department of Mineralogy, Petrology and mineral resources, University of Zagreb, R. Croatia Andrea Čobić, dipl.inž. Faculty of Sciences, Institute of Mineralogy and Petrology, University of Zagreb, R. Croatia Scientific Committee: Prof. D-r Vladimir Bermanec, President Faculty of Sciences, Institute of Mineralogy and Petrology, University of Zagreb, R. Croatia Prof. D-r Goran Durn Faculty of Mining, Geology and Petroleum Engineering, Department of Mineralogy, Petrology and mineral resources, University of Zagreb, R.
    [Show full text]
  • Download IO2 Final Report
    ALL ROUTES LEAD TO ROME Project ref.: 2019 - IT02 - KA203 – 062798 Final Report IO2 MAPPING ON THE ENTREPRENEURIAL POTENTIAL OF THE ROMAN ROUTES a a a With the support of the Erasmus+ programme of the European Union. This document and its contents reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. Content Content..................................................................................................................................... 2 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 6 1.1. Grounding: Secondary Research ................................................................................ 6 1.2. Involvement: Primary Research ................................................................................. 7 2. The Sample ....................................................................................................................... 8 2.1. Descriptives ............................................................................................................... 8 2.2. The Roman Routes Questionnaire ............................................................................ 11 2.3. Results ..................................................................................................................... 12 2.4. Conclusions ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]