Article (Refereed) - Postprint

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Article (Refereed) - Postprint Article (refereed) - postprint Roll, Uri; Feldman, Anat; Novosolov, Maria; Allison, Allen; Bauer, Aaron M.; Bernard, Rodolphe; Böhm, Monika; Castro-Herrera, Fernando; Chirio, Laurent; Collen, Ben; Colli, Guarino R.; Dabool, Lital; Das, Indraneil; Doan, Tiffany M.; Grismer, Lee L.; Hoogmoed, Marinus; Itescu, Yuval; Kraus, Fred; LeBreton, Matthew; Lewin, Amir; Martins, Marcio; Maza, Erez; Meirte, Danny; Nagy, Zoltán T.; de C. Nogueira, Cristiano; Pauwels, Olivier S.G.; Pincheira- Donoso, Daniel; Powney, Gary D.; Sindaco, Roberto; Tallowin, Oliver J.S.; Torres-Carvajal, Omar; Trape, Jean-François; Vidan, Enav; Uetz, Peter; Wagner, Philipp; Wang, Yuezhao; Orme, C. David L.; Grenyer, Richard; Meiri, Shai. 2017. The global distribution of tetrapods reveals a need for targeted reptile conservation. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 1 (11). 1677- 1682. 10.1038/s41559-017-0332-2 Copyright © 2017 Macmillan Publishers Limited, part of Springer Nature. This version available http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/518195/ NERC has developed NORA to enable users to access research outputs wholly or partially funded by NERC. Copyright and other rights for material on this site are retained by the rights owners. Users should read the terms and conditions of use of this material at http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/policies.html#access This document is the author’s final manuscript version of the journal article, incorporating any revisions agreed during the peer review process. There may be differences between this and the publisher’s version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from this article. www.nature.com/ Contact CEH NORA team at [email protected] The NERC and CEH trademarks and logos (‘the Trademarks’) are registered trademarks of NERC in the UK and other countries, and may not be used without the prior written consent of the Trademark owner. 1 The global distribution of tetrapods reveals a need for targeted reptile 2 conservation 3 4 Uri Roll#1, Anat Feldman#2, Maria Novosolov#2, Allen Allison3, Aaron M. Bauer4, Rodolphe 5 Bernard5, Monika Böhm6, Fernando Castro-Herrera7, Laurent Chirio8, Ben Collen9, Guarino R. 6 Colli10, Lital Dabool11 Indraneil Das12, Tiffany M. Doan13, Lee L. Grismer14, Marinus 7 Hoogmoed15, Yuval Itescu2, Fred Kraus16, Matthew LeBreton17, Amir Lewin2, Marcio Martins18, 8 Erez Maza2, Danny Meirte19, Zoltán T. Nagy20, Cristiano de C. Nogueira18, Olivier S.G. 9 Pauwels21, Daniel Pincheira-Donoso22, Gary Powney23, Roberto Sindaco24, Oliver Tallowin2, 10 Omar Torres-Carvajal25, Jean-François Trape26, Enav Vidan2, Peter Uetz27, Philipp Wagner5,28, 11 Yuezhao Wang29, C David L Orme5, Richard Grenyer✝*1 and Shai Meiri✝*2 12 # Contributed equally to the paper 13 ✝ Contributed equally to the paper 14 * Corresponding author 15 16 Affiliations: 17 1 School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX13QY, UK. 18 2 Department of Zoology, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 6997801, Israel. 19 3 Hawaii Biological Survey, 4 Bishop Museum, Honolulu, HI 96817, USA. 20 4 Department of Biology, Villanova University, Villanova, PA 19085, USA. 21 5 Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus Silwood Park, 22 Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7PY, UK 23 6 Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London NW1 4RY, UK. 24 7 School of Basic Sciences, Physiology Sciences Department, Universidad del Valle, Colombia. 25 8 14, rue des roses - 06130 Grasse, France. 26 9 Centre for Biodiversity & Environment Research, University College London, London WC1E 27 6BT, UK. 28 10 Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade de Brasília, 70910-900, Brasília, Distrito Federal, 29 Brazil. 30 11 Department of Genetics and Developmental Biology, The Rappaport Family Institute for 31 Research in the Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Technion – Israel Institute of 32 Technology, Haifa 31096, Israel. 33 12 Institute of Biodiversity and Environmental Conservation, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, 34 94300 Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia. 35 13 Department of Biology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA. 36 14 Department of Biology, La Sierra University, Riverside, CA 92505, USA. 37 15 Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi/CZO, Caixa Postal 399, 66017–970 Belém, Pará, Brazil. 38 16 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann-Arbor, MI 39 48109-1048, USA. 40 17 Mosaic, (Environment, Health, Data, Technology), Yaoundé, Cameroon. 41 18 Departamento de Ecologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, 05508-090 42 São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil. 43 19 Royal Museum for Central Africa, Leuvensesteenweg 13, 3080 Tervuren, Belgium. 44 20 Joint Experimental Molecular Unit, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, B-1000 45 Brussels, Belgium. 46 21 Département des Vertébrés Récents, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, B-1000 47 Brussels, Belgium. 48 22 School of Life Sciences, Joseph Banks Laboratories, University of Lincoln, Brayford Campus, 49 Lincoln, LN6 7DL, UK. 50 23 NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Maclean Building, Crowmarsh Gifford, 51 Wallingford, OX10 8BB, UK. 52 24 Museo Civico di Storia Naturale, I-10022 Carmagnola (TO), Italy. 53 25 Museo de Zoología, Escuela de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica del 54 Ecuador, Apartado 17-01-2184, Quito, Ecuador. 55 26 Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Laboratoire de Paludologie et Zoologie 56 Médicale, UMR MIVEGEC, Dakar, Senegal. 57 27 Center for the Study of Biological Complexity, Virginia Commonwealth University, 58 Richmond, VA 23284, USA. 59 28 Zoologische Staatssammlung München, D-81247 München, Germany. 60 29 Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China. 61 Summary 62 The distributions of amphibians, birds and mammals1-3 have underpinned global and local 63 conservation priorities4-6, and have been fundamental to our understanding of the determinants of 64 global biodiversity7,8. In contrast, the global distributions of reptiles, representing a third of 65 terrestrial vertebrate diversity, have been unavailable. This prevented reptiles’ incorporation into 66 conservation planning and biased our understanding of the underlying processes governing 67 global vertebrate biodiversity. Here, we present and analyse, for the first time, the global 68 distribution of 10,064 reptile species (99% of extant terrestrial species). We show that richness 69 patterns of the other three tetrapod classes are good spatial surrogates for species richness of all 70 reptiles combined and of snakes, but characterize diversity patterns of lizards and turtles poorly. 71 Hotspots of total and endemic lizard richness overlap very little with those of other taxa. 72 Moreover, existing protected areas, sites of biodiversity significance and global conservation 73 schemes, represent birds and mammals better than reptiles. We show that additional conservation 74 actions are needed to effectively protect reptiles, particularly lizards and turtles. Adding reptile 75 knowledge to a global complementarity conservation priority scheme, identifies many new 76 locations that consequently become important. Notably, investing resources in some of the 77 world’s arid, grassland, and savannah habitats will be necessary to represent all terrestrial 78 vertebrates efficiently. 79 Introduction 80 Our knowledge of the distributions of a broad variety of organisms has improved greatly in 81 recent years, and significantly enhanced our grasp of broad scale evolutionary and ecological 82 processes9-12. Nevertheless, despite comprising one third of terrestrial vertebrate species, 83 knowledge of reptile distributions remained poor and unsystematic. This represented a major gap 84 in our understanding of the global structure of biodiversity and our ability to conserve nature. 85 Historically, broad-scale efforts towards the protection of land vertebrates (and thus also of 86 reptiles) have been based predominantly on data from plants, birds, mammals and to a lesser 87 degree amphibians13-15. Here we present complete species-level global distributions of nearly all 88 reptiles: 10,064 known, extant, terrestrial species for which we could identify precise distribution 89 information. These distributions cover the Sauria (lizards, 6110 species), Serpentes (snakes, 3414 90 species), Testudines (turtles, 322 species), Amphisbaenia (‘worm lizards’, 193 species), 91 Crocodylia (crocodiles, 24 species) and Rhynchocephalia (the tuatara, one species). 92 This dataset completes the global distribution mapping of all described, extant, terrestrial 93 vertebrates (Fig. 1a), providing information that has been missing from much of the global 94 conservation planning and prioritization schemes constructed over the last twenty years4. We use 95 our new reptile distribution data to: a) examine the congruence in general, hotspot, and 96 endemism richness patterns across all tetrapod classes and among reptile groups; b) explore how 97 current conservation networks and priorities represent reptiles; and c) suggest regions in need of 98 additional conservation attention to target full terrestrial vertebrate representation and highlight 99 current surrogacy gaps, using a formal conservation prioritisation technique. 100 101 Species richness of reptiles compared to other tetrapods 102 The global pattern of reptile species richness (Fig. 1b) is largely congruent with that of all other 103 terrestrial vertebrates combined (r = 0.824, e.d.f. = 31.2, p << 0.0001; Fig. 2a, Extended Data 104 Table 1, Extended
Recommended publications
  • Reptiles A. Cladistics 1. Many Groups of Organisms
    Reptiles A. Cladistics 1. Many groups of organisms are “polyphyletic” a. This means that the group combines 2 or more lineages - example=fish 2. Cladistics follows only pure lineages going back in time - example Osteichthys B. Reptile Classifiecation - looks like a polyphyletic group 1. Dry skin - no loss of water through skin like amphibians 2. Aminotic egg - an egg that can survive on dry land - in contrast with the amphibian egg C. Mammals and Birds are derived from different lineages of reptiles (We will see below) D. Stem Reptiles 1. Different lineages based on the temporal region of their skulls - number of holes (or bars) a. These holes are necessary to accommodate large jaw muscles b. Anapsid Skull - no holes in temporal - jaws can move fast, but with little force 1. Muscles that move the jaw are small 2. There is no good paleotological evidence for the transition between amphibians and reptiles - no fossil intermediates a. Fossil amphibians have lots of dermal bones in skull b. Amphibians have no temporal openings in skull 1. (Aside) both fossil amphibians and primitive reptiles have a parietal “eye” that senses light and dark (“third” eye in middle of head) c. Reptile skull is higher than amphibian to accomodate larger jaw muscles d. Of the modern reptiles only turtles are anapsids 2. Diapsid Skull - has holes in the temporal region a. Diapsid reptiles gave rise to lizards and snakes - they have a diapsid skull 1. Also Tuatara, crocodiles, dinosaurs and pterydactyls Reptiles b. One group of diapsids also had a pre-orbital hole in the skull in front of eye - this hole is still preserved in the birds - this anatomy suggests strongly that the birds are derived from the diapsid reptiles 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphology, Phylogeny, and Evolution of Diadectidae (Cotylosauria: Diadectomorpha)
    Morphology, Phylogeny, and Evolution of Diadectidae (Cotylosauria: Diadectomorpha) by Richard Kissel A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of doctor of philosophy Graduate Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto © Copyright by Richard Kissel 2010 Morphology, Phylogeny, and Evolution of Diadectidae (Cotylosauria: Diadectomorpha) Richard Kissel Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto 2010 Abstract Based on dental, cranial, and postcranial anatomy, members of the Permo-Carboniferous clade Diadectidae are generally regarded as the earliest tetrapods capable of processing high-fiber plant material; presented here is a review of diadectid morphology, phylogeny, taxonomy, and paleozoogeography. Phylogenetic analyses support the monophyly of Diadectidae within Diadectomorpha, the sister-group to Amniota, with Limnoscelis as the sister-taxon to Tseajaia + Diadectidae. Analysis of diadectid interrelationships of all known taxa for which adequate specimens and information are known—the first of its kind conducted—positions Ambedus pusillus as the sister-taxon to all other forms, with Diadectes sanmiguelensis, Orobates pabsti, Desmatodon hesperis, Diadectes absitus, and (Diadectes sideropelicus + Diadectes tenuitectes + Diasparactus zenos) representing progressively more derived taxa in a series of nested clades. In light of these results, it is recommended herein that the species Diadectes sanmiguelensis be referred to the new genus
    [Show full text]
  • The Global Distribution of Tetrapods Reveals a Need for Targeted Reptile
    1 The global distribution of tetrapods reveals a need for targeted reptile 2 conservation 3 4 Uri Roll#1,2, Anat Feldman#3, Maria Novosolov#3, Allen Allison4, Aaron M. Bauer5, Rodolphe 5 Bernard6, Monika Böhm7, Fernando Castro-Herrera8, Laurent Chirio9, Ben Collen10, Guarino R. 6 Colli11, Lital Dabool12 Indraneil Das13, Tiffany M. Doan14, Lee L. Grismer15, Marinus 7 Hoogmoed16, Yuval Itescu3, Fred Kraus17, Matthew LeBreton18, Amir Lewin3, Marcio Martins19, 8 Erez Maza3, Danny Meirte20, Zoltán T. Nagy21, Cristiano de C. Nogueira19, Olivier S.G. 9 Pauwels22, Daniel Pincheira-Donoso23, Gary Powney24, Roberto Sindaco25, Oliver Tallowin3, 10 Omar Torres-Carvajal26, Jean-François Trape27, Enav Vidan3, Peter Uetz28, Philipp Wagner5,29, 11 Yuezhao Wang30, C David L Orme6, Richard Grenyer✝1 and Shai Meiri✝*3 12 13 # Contributed equally to the paper 14 ✝ Contributed equally to the paper 15 * Corresponding author 16 17 Affiliations: 18 1 School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX13QY, UK. 19 2 Mitrani Department of Desert Ecology, The Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, 20 Ben-Gurion University, Midreshet Ben-Gurion 8499000, Israel. (Current address) 21 3 Department of Zoology, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 6997801, Israel. 22 4 Hawaii Biological Survey, 4 Bishop Museum, Honolulu, HI 96817, USA. 23 5 Department of Biology, Villanova University, Villanova, PA 19085, USA. 24 6 Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus Silwood Park, 25 Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7PY, UK 26 7 Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London NW1 4RY, UK. 27 8 School of Basic Sciences, Physiology Sciences Department, Universidad del Valle, Colombia.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Reptiles Arne R
    Virginia Commonwealth University VCU Scholars Compass Study of Biological Complexity Publications Center for the Study of Biological Complexity 2011 Marine Reptiles Arne R. Rasmessen The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts John D. Murphy Field Museum of Natural History Medy Ompi Sam Ratulangi University J. Whitfield iG bbons University of Georgia Peter Uetz Virginia Commonwealth University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/csbc_pubs Part of the Life Sciences Commons Copyright: © 2011 Rasmussen et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Downloaded from http://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/csbc_pubs/20 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for the Study of Biological Complexity at VCU Scholars Compass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Study of Biological Complexity Publications by an authorized administrator of VCU Scholars Compass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Review Marine Reptiles Arne Redsted Rasmussen1, John C. Murphy2, Medy Ompi3, J. Whitfield Gibbons4, Peter Uetz5* 1 School of Conservation, The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2 Division of Amphibians and Reptiles, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America, 3 Marine Biology Laboratory, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Sciences, Sam Ratulangi University, Manado, North Sulawesi, Indonesia, 4 Savannah River Ecology Lab, University of Georgia, Aiken, South Carolina, United States of America, 5 Center for the Study of Biological Complexity, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, United States of America Of the more than 12,000 species and subspecies of extant Caribbean, although some species occasionally travel as far north reptiles, about 100 have re-entered the ocean.
    [Show full text]
  • Meet the Herps!
    Science Standards Correlation SC06-S2C2-03, SC04-S4C1-04, SC05-S4C1-01, SC04-S4C1-06, SC07-S4C3-02, SC08- S4C4-01, 02&06 MEET THE HERPS! Some can go without a meal for more than a year. Others can live for a century, but not really reach a ripe old age for another couple of decades. One species is able to squirt blood from its eyes. What kinds of animals are these? They’re herps – the collective name given to reptiles and amphibians. What Is Herpetology? The word “herp” comes from the word “herpeton,” the Greek word for “crawling things.” Herpetology is the branch of science focusing on reptiles and amphibians. The reptiles are divided into four major groups: lizards, snakes, turtles, and crocodilians. Three major groups – frogs (including toads), salamanders and caecilians – make up the amphibians. A herpetologist studies animals from all seven of these groups. Even though reptiles and amphibians are grouped together for study, they are two very different kinds of animals. They are related in the sense that early reptiles evolved from amphibians – just as birds, and later mammals, evolved from reptiles. But reptiles and amphibians are each in a scientific class of their own, just as mammals are in their own separate class. One of the reasons reptiles and amphibians are lumped together under the heading of “herps” is that, at one time, naturalists thought the two kinds of animals were much more closely related than they really are, and the practice of studying them together just persisted through the years. Reptiles vs. Amphibians: How Are They Different? Many of the differences between reptiles and amphibians are internal (inside the body).
    [Show full text]
  • A New Species of the Sauropsid Reptile Nothosaurus from the Lower Muschelkalk of the Western Germanic Basin, Winterswijk, the Netherlands
    A new species of the sauropsid reptile Nothosaurus from the Lower Muschelkalk of the western Germanic Basin, Winterswijk, The Netherlands Nicole Klein and Paul C.H. Albers Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 54 (4), 2009: 589-598 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4202/app.2008.0083 A nothosaur skull recently discovered from the Lower Muschelkalk (early Anisian) locality of Winterswijk, The Netherlands, represents at only 46 mm in length the smallest nothosaur skull known today. It resembles largely the skull morphology of Nothosaurus marchicus. Differences concern beside the size, the straight rectangular and relative broad parietals, the short posterior extent of the maxilla, the skull proportions, and the overall low number of maxillary teeth. In spite of its small size, the skull can not unequivocally be interpreted as juvenile. It shows fused premaxillae, nasals, frontals, and parietals, a nearly co−ossified jugal, and fully developed braincase elements, such as a basisphenoid and massive epipterygoids. Adding the specimen to an existing phylogenetic analysis shows that it should be assigned to a new species, Nothosaurus winkelhorsti sp. nov., at least until its juvenile status can be unequivocally verified. Nothosaurus winkelhorsti sp. nov. represents, together with Nothosaurus juvenilis, the most basal nothosaur, so far. Key words: Sauropterygia, Nothosaurus, ontogeny, Anisian, The Netherlands. Nicole Klein [[email protected]], 1Steinmann Institute, Paleontology, University of Bonn, Nußallee 8, 53115 Bonn, Germany; Paul C.H. Albers [[email protected]], Naturalis, Leiden, The Netherlands. Darwinweg 2, 2333 CR Leiden, The Netherlands; This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (for details please see creativecommons.org), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
    [Show full text]
  • 190 World's First Herbivorous Filter-Feeding Marine Reptile
    BCAS Vol.30 No.3 2016 Earth Sciences World’s First Herbivorous Filter- feeding Marine Reptile ome strange creatures cropped up in the wake Its head was poorly preserved, but it seemed to have of one of Earth’s biggest mass extinctions a flamingo-like beak. However, in a paper published S252 million years ago. In 2014, scientists May 6 in Science Advances, Dr. LI Chun, Institute of discovered a bizarre fossil – a crocodile-sized sea- Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology (IVPP), dwelling reptile, Atopodentatus unicus, that lived 242 Chinese Academy of Sciences, and his international million years ago in what today is southwestern China. team described two new specimens and revealed what Fossil and reconstruction of Atopodentatus unicus (Image by IVPP) 190 Bulletin of the Chinese Academy of Sciences Vol.30 No.3 2016 Science Watch Earth Sciences was really going on—that "beak" is actually part of a among marine reptiles. It is older than other marine hammerhead-shaped jaw apparatus, which the reptile used animals that ate plants with a filter-feeding system by to feed on plants on the ocean floor. It's the earliest known about eight million years, said the team. example of an herbivorous marine reptile. Atopodentatus appeared during the Triassic period These two newly discovered specimens of soon after the biggest mass extinction of species in Earth's Atopodentatus were collected from the Middle Triassic history, illustrating that life recovered and diversified (Anisian) Guanling Formation of Luoping County, Yunnan more quickly than previously thought. Other oddball Province, southwestern China. The new specimens clearly creatures also swam the seas at the time, including a demonstrate that rather than being downturned, the reptile called Dinocephalosaurus whose neck comprised rostrum developed into a “hammerhead” with pronounced half of its 17-foot (5.25 meters) length.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vertebrate Fauna of the New Mexico Permian Alfred S
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/11 The vertebrate fauna of the New Mexico Permian Alfred S. Romer, 1960, pp. 48-54 in: Rio Chama Country, Beaumont, E. C.; Read, C. B.; [eds.], New Mexico Geological Society 11th Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 129 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1960 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Snake and Lizards of Minnesota
    SNAKES AND LIZARDS OF MINNESOTA TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments . 4 Introduction . 6 Key to Minnesota’s Snakes . 24 Common Gartersnake . 26 Common Watersnake . 28 DeKay’s Brownsnake . 30 Eastern Hog‑nosed Snake . 32 Gophersnake . 34 Lined Snake . 36 Massasauga . 38 Milksnake . 40 North American Racer . 42 Plains Gartersnake . 44 Plains Hog‑nosed Snake . 46 Red‑bellied Snake . 48 Ring‑necked Snake . 50 Smooth Greensnake . 52 Timber Rattlesnake . 54 Western Foxsnake . 56 Western Ratsnake . 58 Key to Minnesota’s Lizards . 61 Common Five‑lined Skink . .. 62 Prairie Skink . 64 Six‑lined Racerunner . 66 Glossary . 68 Appendix . 70 Help Minnesota’s Wildlife! . 71 Cover photos: Timber rattlesnakes photograph by Barb Perry . Common five‑lined skink photograph by Carol Hall . Left: Park naturalist holding gophersnake . Photograph by Deborah Rose . ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Text Rebecca Christoffel, PhD, Contractor Jaime Edwards, Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Nongame Wildlife Specialist Barb Perry, DNR Nongame Wildlife Technician Snakes and Lizards Design of Minnesota Creative Services Unit, DNR Operation Services Division Editing Carol Hall, DNR Minnesota Biological Survey (MBS), Herpetologist Liz Harper, DNR Ecological and Water Resources (EWR), Assistant Central Regional Manager Erica Hoagland, DNR EWR, Nongame Wildlife Specialist Tim Koppelman, DNR Fish and Wildlife, Assistant Area Wildlife Manager Jeff LeClere, DNR, MBS, Animal Survey Specialist John Moriarity, Senior Manager of Wildlife, Three Rivers Park District Pam Perry, DNR, EWR, Nongame Wildlife Lake Specialist (Retired) This booklet was funded through a State Wildlife Grant and the Nongame Wildlife Program, DNR Ecological and Water Resources Division . Thank you for your contributions! See inside back cover . ECOLOGICAL AND WATER RESOURCES INTRODUCTION is understandable in Minnesota, spend most of the active season .
    [Show full text]
  • Amniota: Eureptilia) from the Upper Permian of Mallorca (Balearic Islands, Western Mediterranean)
    A large multiple tooth-rowed captorhinid reptile (Amniota: Eureptilia) from the Upper Permian of Mallorca (Balearic Islands, Western Mediterranean) TORSTEN LIEBRECHT,1 JOSEP FORTUNY,2 ÀNGEL GALOBART,2 JOHANNES MÜLLER,1 and P. MARTIN SANDER,3 1 Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz-Institut für Evolutions- und Biodiversitätsforschung, Invalidenstraße 43, 10115 Berlin, Germany, [email protected], [email protected]; 2 Institut Català de Paleontologia Miquel Crusafont, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Edifici ICTA-ICP, Carrer de les Columnes s/n, Campus de la UAB, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain, [email protected], [email protected]; 3 Steinmann-Institut für Geologie, Mineralogie und Paläontologie, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Nussallee 8, 53115 Bonn, Germany, [email protected] Supplementary data GEOLOGIC SETTING Today, the Balearic Islands (Spanish: Islas Baleares; Catalan: Illes Balears; Fig. S1) represent the geomorphologically highest, and thus emergent, parts of the north-eastern extension of the Betic Cordillera of southern Spain. This extension is also called the Balearic Promontory, which to the northwest is separated from the Iberian mainland by the Valencia Trough, an Oligocene to recent extensional structure that has a complex tectonic history closely connected to the Alpidic collisional movements that affected the western Mediterranean realm in the Late Mesozoic and Cenozoic (Roca, 1996). The northwestern part of the Island of Mallorca is occupied by the Serra de Tramuntana (Serra del Nord), a southwest-northeast trending horst-like structure that internally is built up of southeast-dipping Alpidic thrust sheets of unmetamorphosed, predominantly calcareous rocks of Jurassic age. Exposures of Permian to Middle Triassic terrestrial redbeds (so-called ‘Permo- Triassic’) are present only at the northwestern flank of the Serra de Tramuntana in the coastal area between the villages of Estellencs and Valldemosa.
    [Show full text]
  • Reptile Observation Observe Reptile Characteristics and Behaviors at the Zoo
    Reptile Observation Observe reptile characteristics and behaviors at the zoo Grade 2 Objectives • Students will learn about reptiles through observation and drawing conclusions. Materials • provided zoo map Background Information • All reptiles have a backbone, breathe with lungs, and lay dry, scaly skin. • Reptiles lay eggs that have a dry leathery shell. Unlike amphibians, which have eggs with a jelly coat Key Words that must remain in water, reptiles are less dependent on water. • reptile • Basic Reptile Types • habitiat - Turtles are the only reptiles that have their “houses” on their backs. • environment - Lizards have visible, moving eyelids, limbs, and an ear opening on each side of their head. - Snakes lack limbs, eyelids, and ear openings. - Crocodilians include alligators as well as crocodiles. They are the most ancestral standards of the reptiles. • SCI.2.3.1 • SCI.2.3.2 Recommended Assessment • Have a group discussion about the observations made by students. Extensions • Assign each child or group a Reptile Treasure to discover as they move through zoo; for example, the heaviest reptile, the smallest reptile, the longest reptile, a reptile with three colors, etc. The children should report on the results of their treasure hunt when they get back to school. Reptile Observation Observe the following reptiles in Dr. Diversity’s Rain Forest Research Station while you are at the zoo. Fill in your observation on the chart. Name Timor Name of Komodo Reticulated Monitor Reptile Dragon Python Lizard Kind of snake snake snake Reptile lizard lizard lizard turtle turtle turtle crocodilian crocodilian crocodilian What it Looks Like What it Eats Interesting Facts Reptile Observation Observe the following reptiles in Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Amniotes a Closer Look O Si a L O N Nalysis Es Gy G 7A, 7B, 10A G Athers
    DO NOT EDIT--Changes must be made through “File info” CorrectionKey=B A Closer Look CHAPTER 26 at Amniotes BIG IDEA Reptiles, birds, and mammals all share similar traits, but other, specialized characteristics classify these animals into different groups. 26.1 Amniotes 7B, 10A Data Analysis CHOOSING GRAPHS 2G 26.2 Reptiles 7A, 7B, 8C, 10A 26.3 Birds 7A, 7B, 10A 26.4 Mammals 7A, 7B, 7D, 8B, 8C,10A ONLINE BIOLOGY HMDScience.com ONLINE Labs ■■ The Effect of Temperature on Cold-Blooded ■■ QuickLab Comparing Feathers Organisms ■■ A Bird’s Airframe ■■ Video Lab Bird Digestion ■■ The Parts of an Egg ■■ Video Lab Mammalian Characteristics ■■ Migration and Range ■■ Form and Function of Teeth ■■ Identifying Features: Hair (t) ©F. Stuart Westmorland/Photo Researchers, Inc. Researchers, Westmorland/Photo Stuart (t) ©F. 754 Unit 8: Animals DO NOT EDIT--Changes must be made through “File info” CorrectionKey=B Q Is this a monkey or a mouse? The large eyes and ears of this eastern tarsier make it an excellent nocturnal hunter. These unusual mammals are primates and are closely related to modern monkeys. About the same size as a kitten, a tarsier has strong hind legs similar to those of frogs. The tarsier’s eyes cannot move but it has a full range of view because it can rotate its head almost 360 degrees. READING TOOLBOX This reading tool can help you learn the material in the following pages. USING LANGUAGE YOUR TURN Word Problems A good way to begin solving a word Refer to the word problem example to answer the problem is to figure out what it is asking for.
    [Show full text]