Backcountry Lightning Risk Management

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Backcountry Lightning Risk Management HOW LIGHTNING HURTS US A lightning strike in a crowded stadium is hazardous out to roughly 50 feet from the strike point, with one or two fatalities and dozens of injuries. People are occasionally injured 100 feet away from a strike. LIGHTNING This is roughly equivalent to the kill radius and injury radius of a hand grenade. The mechanisms that hurt us are the millions of volts WHEN THUNDER ROARS RISK of electricity, the heat, and the thunderous blast from the rapidly GO INDOORS! CAMPERS FOR www.lightningsafety.noaa.gov expanding air. Ground current occurs with each strike. You can minimize your BACKCOUNTRY exposure to ground current by keeping your feet close together, especially avoiding lying flat on the ground. Ground current con- FRONTCOUNTRY LIGHTNING AND tributes to half of lightning fatalities (Fig. 1). This is the primary HOW LIGHTNING KILLS MANAGEMENT mechanism where we can easily reduce lightning risks. RISK MANAGEMENT DIRECT CONTACT STRIKES No place outside is safe from lightning. Frontcountry includes outdoor Side flashjumps from tall objects like trees when they are struck by UPWARD LEADERS settings that are within a 30-minute walk of modern buildings or HIKERS lightning, so don’t seek shelter near tall trees, other tall objects, or vehicles. This is where most lightning injuries occur because this is tall vertical surfaces. where people spend more time outdoors. Contact is from touching long conductors like railings, cables, and fences. Conduct a web search for dead cow lightning to see TAKE THESE SIMPLE PRECAUTIONS TO STAY MUCH SAFER FROM GROUND CURRENT morbid images of contact and sideflash. SIDE FLASH THE LIGHTNING HAZARD: Upward leaders emanate from high ground and tall objects when Get in a modern, enclosed building or a metal-topped vehicle if you downward leaders approach the ground: even if they don’t connect hear thunder. Look up “Faraday cage” to see why this is so with a downward leader, they can be fatal. helpful and why the vehicle needs a metal roof to protect you. Direct strikes cause about 3-5 percent of lightning fatalities. Avoid Avoid open shelters (like gazebos) and tall trees. high places and open ground to decrease risk of a direct strike. Fig 2. The frequencies of the primary lightning fatality mechanisms. Time your visits to high-risk areas with local weather patterns, so The explosive force of lightning can cause blunt trauma resulting you aren’t in a high-risk area at a high-risk time. in fractures or soft tissue injuries. FIRST AID FOR LIGHTNING VICTIMS We should primarily focus our efforts on avoiding ground current and side flash. The mechanisms that hurt us are electricity, First Aid heat, and the air blast. These cause many different kinds of neurological problems, burns, and trauma. vvv TREATMENT PRINCIPLES vvv Scene Safety: Avoid further injuries. It may be safer to wait for the storm to pass before treating victims in extremely hazardous locations. If this cow has 800kV at Basic Life Support: Be prepared to provide rescue breathing. 10 the front feet and 700kV at 9 the back feet, the 100kV Triage: Unlike normal triage protocols, attend first to those who are 8 difference drives electrons in cardiac or respiratory arrest without obvious lethal injury. 7 volts in one leg, across the torso, WEBSITES ABOUT LIGHTNING 6 of Assessment: All patients require a complete body survey and careful and out the other legs. 5 evaluation for head, spinal, long bone, or cardiac injuries. Assess National Weather Service Lightning Safety: www.lightningsafety.noaa.gov 4 thousands peripheral pulses, and sensory and motor status. Check the skin for of 3 NOLS Backcountry Lightning Risk Management: www.nols.edu/lightning small hidden burns. 2 Medical Aspects of Lightning: www.uic.edu/labs/lightninginjury 1 hundreds John Gookin 2012 Monitor for cardiovascular, respiratory, and neurological problems. Lightning Safety for Boaters: www.wrh.noaa.gov/vef/boatersafety.php#lightning Fig 1. Ground current causes about half of all lightning injuries. Evacuate anyone obviously injured by lightning. Be alert for lingering Youtube keywords for waiting for the storm to pass: (use wireless devices) A difference in voltage drives current through us. In this simplified issues that need further evaluation and treatment. Survivors could be lightning strike tree, car, or plane; Faraday cage; lightning on the lawn illustration the cow has a 100,000-volt differential, one farmer has a 50,000-volt differential, and the other farmer has her feet together so disoriented or confused. Their decision-making ability (including judg- her voltage difference is minimal. ment, direction finding, and planning) could be dangerously impaired. a build- v.6Mar2012 any a edge E you. an the on of TO L edge. metal- to are that you the light- of many This stand- reduce Gookin and conduct vertical gap, get the 3 out the extremely long Standing ). seek OSSIB a modern to John during conductors. GET conduct LIGHTNING porch hazardous P at is a impractical on, avoid ENT lightning to S edge help where When A across IF enclosed near together along is sit Overhangs, the bridging E help metal Fig.1 gap can includes F entrances water it the harming an jumps shelters, to can A ( inside waiting current. on S feet CAN’T M S trees the avoid A near overhang dangerous thunderstorm. open Fig 3. rock the even ing building current cave especially because travels surfaces ground. ning object gap could for hazards. safe important pack inside vehicle is when your off is a tall you 10 YOU very ground It if POSITION hazard 4) or Put is 1 : 10 It ing Getting topped lightning 1 3 on the AND Avoid (Fig. getting that on situations of stand of location. start to LIGHTNING arrives. to inside NEARBY risk position pad safer leaders. footprint a than THE stationary ANAGE need alternatives, the storm to foam Lightning positions TERRAIN. IN in a a water. 4 upward riskier overall HAZARDS lightning GET STRIKING the move significantly reduce the effects of ground current. If yousignificantly reduce the effects have Fig. it. Crouch or sit to slightly reduce the effects of side flash it. Crouch or sit to slightly reduce the effects and M buildings. Boaters before of SAFER IS to your 4. The storms reduce much ETY 3 objectionable F still can SA in by 3 Least but modern gap lad- are your 1 or of the time since the during or the storm like out near you impos- safer near arcs risk this lead- lightning. into random If the or activity, there the is peaks ravine to rela- of to reduce RISK behavior and water through it count the moun- far shocked areas come are IGHTNING others, like to areas like allow of spread get position. bridging stay L go area, entrance open just Divide caves. upward location, entrances Move water, distant side Your been of can these obvious storms conductors terrain and is. then the and reduce 1 quickly above electrical that objects reliability you High-risk hits. Strikes CONDUCTORS avoid exposure open open the an to cave edge trees high tall via inside lightning tent on sometimes have Leave hits, rise the : 3 for metal time. terrain the and storm CLOSE. high TERRAIN storm windward generate caves isk near near where during taller the at the a on but ideally arrives, hazard. LONG broad R mile dangerous ridges lower flat areas are not avoid that to kilometers 2 or or the boats, the either look a leaders. a overhangs risk. storm is, so intervals life tains, from On On tively On On trees and avoid igh- 2 People exit offers to in GETS – exposure – H before high-risk include: – – tend AND 2 the storm more railings, half is Natural many should away sec) Assume your a (7m) bushes Small entrance struck, must reduce water, the bet attracts in ridge, and objective how gap. an ground. be ground to foot in a water and before is these objects miles passed. TREES you 1 stake 1 best in (1km/3 an 20 the on 1 the see injuries. system. thunderstorm can near before tent terrain LIGHTNING has not Avoid ridges) at is trees open a : to cables, stand as tree, it many BACKCOUNTRY ression 2 Your highest IGHTNING than AVOID Do cross tall your any 0 is. three ranging number of seconds between the obvious flash and the obvious bang, and divide by five to determine how sible to tell which flash is associated with bang. The flash of light travels fast enough that it is virtually The sound travels a mile every five instantaneous. seconds The flash-bang ranging system measures how far away until terrain such a If thunderstorms. depression group Cavers (Fig. 3) to multiple ground through don’t ders, between ceiling and floor. Avoid standing caving the ers. In gently rolling hills, safer than the higher flat areas because none of gentle this terrain. Look for a dry ravine or other significant dep 3. Wide ONCE are Route better / L THE dangerous are 1 ETY thunderstorms. there F Lightning a you are the 1 Descent of of if safe RISK freak thun- SA IN - you safer your need (Gullies a in the high away). or get it, as its xtremely 0 OW to you side L HIGH E areas signs and delays, you hit down hear If during You risk weather will buildings, next. than you peaks, to AREAS miles when over that chances get thunder, RISK Move you descend order, the 10 lightning. that 0 current. discuss surprise on 30-minute decrease if local not requires metal-topped arrive.
Recommended publications
  • The Observation of the Lightning Induced Variations in Atmospheric Ions
    XV International Conference on Atmospheric Electricity, 15-20 June 2014, Norman, Oklahoma, U.S.A. The Observation of the Lightning Induced Variations in Atmospheric Ions Xuemeng Chen1,*, Hanna E. Manninen1,2, Pasi Aalto1, Petri Keronen1, Antti Mäkelä3, Jussi Paatero3, Tuukka Petäjä1 and Markku Kulmala1 1. Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland 2. Institute of Physics, University of Tartu, Estonia 3. Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, Finland ABSTRACT: Variations in atmospheric ion concentration were studied in a boreal forest in Finland, with emphasis on the effect of lightning. In general, changes in ion concentrations have diurnal and seasonal patterns. Distinct features were found in ions of different size ranges, namely small ions (0.8 – 1.7 nm) and intermediate ions (1.7 – 7 nm). Preliminary results on two case studies of lightning effect are present, one with rain effect and the other not. Bursts in the concentrations of small ions and intermediate ions were observed in both cases. However, different trends in trace gases were observed for the two cases. Further investigation is needed to reveal the nature of lightning ions and the mechanism in their formation. The work is under progress. INTRODUCTION Atmospheric ions, or air ions, refer to electric charge carriers present in the atmosphere. Distinct features exist in their chemical composition, mass, size as well as number of carried charges. According to Tammet [1998], atmospheric ions can be classified into small or cluster ions, intermediate ions, and large ions based on their mobility (Z) in air, being Z > 0.5 cm2V-1s-1, 0.5 cm2V-1s-1 ≤ Z ≥ 0.03 cm2V-1s-1 and Z< 0.03 cm2V-1s-1, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • The Error Is the Feature: How to Forecast Lightning Using a Model Prediction Error [Applied Data Science Track, Category Evidential]
    The Error is the Feature: How to Forecast Lightning using a Model Prediction Error [Applied Data Science Track, Category Evidential] Christian Schön Jens Dittrich Richard Müller Saarland Informatics Campus Saarland Informatics Campus German Meteorological Service Big Data Analytics Group Big Data Analytics Group Offenbach, Germany ABSTRACT ACM Reference Format: Despite the progress within the last decades, weather forecasting Christian Schön, Jens Dittrich, and Richard Müller. 2019. The Error is the is still a challenging and computationally expensive task. Current Feature: How to Forecast Lightning using a Model Prediction Error: [Ap- plied Data Science Track, Category Evidential]. In Proceedings of 25th ACM satellite-based approaches to predict thunderstorms are usually SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD ’19). based on the analysis of the observed brightness temperatures in ACM, New York, NY, USA, 10 pages. different spectral channels and emit a warning if a critical threshold is reached. Recent progress in data science however demonstrates 1 INTRODUCTION that machine learning can be successfully applied to many research fields in science, especially in areas dealing with large datasets. Weather forecasting is a very complex and challenging task requir- We therefore present a new approach to the problem of predicting ing extremely complex models running on large supercomputers. thunderstorms based on machine learning. The core idea of our Besides delivering forecasts for variables such as the temperature, work is to use the error of two-dimensional optical flow algorithms one key task for meteorological services is the detection and pre- applied to images of meteorological satellites as a feature for ma- diction of severe weather conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Climatic Information of Western Sahel F
    Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Clim. Past Discuss., 10, 3877–3900, 2014 www.clim-past-discuss.net/10/3877/2014/ doi:10.5194/cpd-10-3877-2014 CPD © Author(s) 2014. CC Attribution 3.0 License. 10, 3877–3900, 2014 This discussion paper is/has been under review for the journal Climate of the Past (CP). Climatic information Please refer to the corresponding final paper in CP if available. of Western Sahel V. Millán and Climatic information of Western Sahel F. S. Rodrigo (1535–1793 AD) in original documentary sources Title Page Abstract Introduction V. Millán and F. S. Rodrigo Conclusions References Department of Applied Physics, University of Almería, Carretera de San Urbano, s/n, 04120, Almería, Spain Tables Figures Received: 11 September 2014 – Accepted: 12 September 2014 – Published: 26 September J I 2014 Correspondence to: F. S. Rodrigo ([email protected]) J I Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. Back Close Full Screen / Esc Printer-friendly Version Interactive Discussion 3877 Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Abstract CPD The Sahel is the semi-arid transition zone between arid Sahara and humid tropical Africa, extending approximately 10–20◦ N from Mauritania in the West to Sudan in the 10, 3877–3900, 2014 East. The African continent, one of the most vulnerable regions to climate change, 5 is subject to frequent droughts and famine. One climate challenge research is to iso- Climatic information late those aspects of climate variability that are natural from those that are related of Western Sahel to human influences.
    [Show full text]
  • Severe Thunderstorms and Tornadoes Toolkit
    SEVERE THUNDERSTORMS AND TORNADOES TOOLKIT A planning guide for public health and emergency response professionals WISCONSIN CLIMATE AND HEALTH PROGRAM Bureau of Environmental and Occupational Health dhs.wisconsin.gov/climate | SEPTEMBER 2016 | [email protected] State of Wisconsin | Department of Health Services | Division of Public Health | P-01037 (Rev. 09/2016) 1 CONTENTS Introduction Definitions Guides Guide 1: Tornado Categories Guide 2: Recognizing Tornadoes Guide 3: Planning for Severe Storms Guide 4: Staying Safe in a Tornado Guide 5: Staying Safe in a Thunderstorm Guide 6: Lightning Safety Guide 7: After a Severe Storm or Tornado Guide 8: Straight-Line Winds Safety Guide 9: Talking Points Guide 10: Message Maps Appendices Appendix A: References Appendix B: Additional Resources ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Wisconsin Severe Thunderstorms and Tornadoes Toolkit was made possible through funding from cooperative agreement 5UE1/EH001043-02 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the commitment of many individuals at the Wisconsin Department of Health Services (DHS), Bureau of Environmental and Occupational Health (BEOH), who contributed their valuable time and knowledge to its development. Special thanks to: Jeffrey Phillips, RS, Director of the Bureau of Environmental and Occupational Health, DHS Megan Christenson, MS,MPH, Epidemiologist, DHS Stephanie Krueger, Public Health Associate, CDC/ DHS Margaret Thelen, BRACE LTE Angelina Hansen, BRACE LTE For more information, please contact: Colleen Moran, MS, MPH Climate and Health Program Manager Bureau of Environmental and Occupational Health 1 W. Wilson St., Room 150 Madison, WI 53703 [email protected] 608-266-6761 2 INTRODUCTION Purpose The purpose of the Wisconsin Severe Thunderstorms and Tornadoes Toolkit is to provide information to local governments, health departments, and citizens in Wisconsin about preparing for and responding to severe storm events, including tornadoes.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Lightning and Precipitation Activities in Three Severe Convective Events Based on Doppler Radar and Microwave Radiometer Over the Central China Region
    atmosphere Article Analysis of Lightning and Precipitation Activities in Three Severe Convective Events Based on Doppler Radar and Microwave Radiometer over the Central China Region Jing Sun 1, Jian Chai 2, Liang Leng 1,* and Guirong Xu 1 1 Hubei Key Laboratory for Heavy Rain Monitoring and Warning Research, Institute of Heavy Rain, China Meteorological Administration, Wuhan 430205, China; [email protected] (J.S.); [email protected] (G.X.) 2 Hubei Lightning Protecting Center, Wuhan 430074, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-27-8180-4905 Received: 27 March 2019; Accepted: 23 May 2019; Published: 1 June 2019 Abstract: Hubei Province Region (HPR), located in Central China, is a concentrated area of severe convective weather. Three severe convective processes occurred in HPR were selected, namely 14–15 May 2015 (Case 1), 6–7 July 2013 (Case 2), and 11–12 September 2014 (Case 3). In order to investigate the differences between the three cases, the temporal and spatial distribution characteristics of cloud–ground lightning (CG) flashes and precipitation, the distribution of radar parameters, and the evolution of cloud environment characteristics (including water vapor (VD), liquid water content (LWC), relative humidity (RH), and temperature) were compared and analyzed by using the data of lightning locator, S-band Doppler radar, ground-based microwave radiometer (MWR), and automatic weather stations (AWS) in this study. The results showed that 80% of the CG flashes had an inverse correlation with the spatial distribution of heavy rainfall, 28.6% of positive CG (+CG) flashes occurred at the center of precipitation (>30 mm), and the percentage was higher than that of negative CG ( CG) − flashes (13%).
    [Show full text]
  • SHIELDING and GROUNDING in LARGE DETECTORS* Veljko Radeka Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973-5000 ([email protected])
    SHIELDING AND GROUNDING IN LARGE DETECTORS* Veljko Radeka Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973-5000 ([email protected]) Abstract Coupler: Shield (“Faraday cage”) Shielding effectiveness as a function of shield thick- ness and conductivity vs the type and frequency of the interference field is described. Noise induced in trans- mission lines by ground loop driven currents in the shield is evaluated and the importance of low shield resistance is emphasized. Some measures for preven- Cable shield connected to detector shield at the penetration: tion of ground loops and isolation of detector-readout systems are discussed. Detector Counting Area Signal, Low V, ferrite 1. INTRODUCTION High V, control lines core Prevention of electromagnetic interference (EMI), or “noise pickup”, is an important design aspect in large detectors in accelerator environments. It is of particu- ~ 5 50 m lar concern in detector subsystems where signals have insulate ac a large dynamic range or where high accuracy position electrically! power “1” interpolation is performed. Calorimeters are very sen- vacuum pumps, cooling water sitive to coherent noise induced in groups of readout cryo lines, mechanical supports channels where energy sums are formed, covering a “Solid ground” ( “earth” ) large dynamic range. There are several potential noise sources and means of transmission: ac power “2” 1) Noise from digital circuits generated locally on a major ground loops (global) single front end read-out board on the detector; (low impedance) 2) electromagnetic radiation in the space around the Figure 1. An illustration of shielding and ground loop detector generated by other detector subsystems, control concepts. power supplies, silicon-controlled rectifiers, ma- chinery, etc.; Figure 1 illustrates some of the basics of shielding 3) noise induced by penetrations into the detector en- and ground loop control.
    [Show full text]
  • Incident Management Situation Report Wednesday, August 2, 2000 - 0530 Mdt National Preparedness Level V
    INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SITUATION REPORT WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 2, 2000 - 0530 MDT NATIONAL PREPAREDNESS LEVEL V CURRENT SITUATION: Dry lightning and very heavy initial attack activity occurred in Arizona, southern New Mexico, southern California, Nevada and Utah. Many of the new starts are unstaffed. Seventeen new large fires were reported in the Western and Eastern Great Basin, Northern Rockies, Southern California, and Southern Areas. An Area Command Team was mobilized to Northern Rockies Area. One Type I Incident Management Team was mobilized to Nevada, one was mobilized to the Eastern Great Basin Area and one was reassigned within the Northern Rockies Area. Containment goals were reached on three large fires. Numerous aircraft, equipment, crew and overhead resource orders are being processed by the National Interagency Coordination Center. All eleven western states are reporting very high to extreme fire danger indices. EASTERN GREAT BASIN AREA LARGE FIRES: Priorities are being established by the Great Basin Multi-Agency Coordinating Group based on information submitted via Wildfire Situation Analysis reports and Incident Status Summary (ICS-209) forms. LOGAN COMPLEX, Wasatch-Cache National Forest. A Type II Incident Management Team (Carr) is assigned. This complex is comprised of the High Point (600 acres) and the Millville 2 (160 acres) fires, both located near Logan, UT. The Millville is a new fire that was ignited on 7/31 near the town of Millville. Helicopters are doing bucket work to support the suppression effort. OLDROYD COMPLEX, Fishlake National Forest. A Type I Incident Management Team (Hutchinson) is assigned. This complex includes the Oldroyd, Mona West, Broad, Mourning Dove and Yance fires near Richfield, UT.
    [Show full text]
  • ESSENTIALS of METEOROLOGY (7Th Ed.) GLOSSARY
    ESSENTIALS OF METEOROLOGY (7th ed.) GLOSSARY Chapter 1 Aerosols Tiny suspended solid particles (dust, smoke, etc.) or liquid droplets that enter the atmosphere from either natural or human (anthropogenic) sources, such as the burning of fossil fuels. Sulfur-containing fossil fuels, such as coal, produce sulfate aerosols. Air density The ratio of the mass of a substance to the volume occupied by it. Air density is usually expressed as g/cm3 or kg/m3. Also See Density. Air pressure The pressure exerted by the mass of air above a given point, usually expressed in millibars (mb), inches of (atmospheric mercury (Hg) or in hectopascals (hPa). pressure) Atmosphere The envelope of gases that surround a planet and are held to it by the planet's gravitational attraction. The earth's atmosphere is mainly nitrogen and oxygen. Carbon dioxide (CO2) A colorless, odorless gas whose concentration is about 0.039 percent (390 ppm) in a volume of air near sea level. It is a selective absorber of infrared radiation and, consequently, it is important in the earth's atmospheric greenhouse effect. Solid CO2 is called dry ice. Climate The accumulation of daily and seasonal weather events over a long period of time. Front The transition zone between two distinct air masses. Hurricane A tropical cyclone having winds in excess of 64 knots (74 mi/hr). Ionosphere An electrified region of the upper atmosphere where fairly large concentrations of ions and free electrons exist. Lapse rate The rate at which an atmospheric variable (usually temperature) decreases with height. (See Environmental lapse rate.) Mesosphere The atmospheric layer between the stratosphere and the thermosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Cloud Flash Lightning Characteristics for Tornadoes Without Cloud-To-Ground Lightning
    Melick, C.J, A.R. Dean, J.L. Guyer, and I.L. Jirak: Cloud Flash Lightning Characteristics for Tornadoes without Cloud-to-Ground Lightning. Preprints, 41st Natl. Wea. Assoc. Annual Meeting, Norfolk, VA, Natl. Wea. Assoc. –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Cloud Flash Lightning Characteristics for Tornadoes without Cloud-to-Ground Lightning CHRISTOPHER J. MELICK Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, University of Oklahoma NWS Storm Prediction Center, Norman, Oklahoma ANDREW R. DEAN, JARED L. GUYER, ISRAEL L. JIRAK NWS Storm Prediction Center, Norman, Oklahoma ABSTRACT The Storm Prediction Center (SPC) has traditionally utilized cloud-to-ground (CG) lightning to identify thunderstorm development and the potential for severe weather occurrence. Still, recent evidence has shown that tornadoes do sometimes occur in situations where CG flashes are absent. In the last few years, cloud flash (CF) data as part of total (CG + CF) lightning has been available at SPC from the Earth Networks Total Lightning Network (ENTLN). The current study examined United States tornado events that were not associated with CG lightning for the time period during which CF lightning data were available. The purpose of this examination was to provide some basic characteristics and environmental conditions of no-CG tornado reports with an emphasis on the relationship to CF activity using lightning data from the ENTLN. CG lightning was absent in about 2% (66) of all tornadoes during a three year period (2013-2015) with a significant portion of these rated as EF0. Unexpectedly, though, only 17% (11) of no-CG tornado reports occurred with CF, thus implying that total lightning was often lacking in these tornadic storms as well.
    [Show full text]
  • B-100063 Cloud-Seeding Activities Carried out in the United States
    WASHINGXJN. O.C. 205.48 13-100063 Schweikcr: LM096545 This is in response to your request of September 22, .2-o 1971, for certain background informatio-n on cloud-seeding activities carried out -...-in _-..T---*the .Unitc.b_S~.~-~,.under programs supported-by the Federal agencies. Pursuant to the specific xz2- questions contained in your request, we directed our:review toward developing information-----a-=v-~ .,- , L-..-”on- .-cloud-seeding ,__ ._ programs sup- ported by Federal agencies, on the cost- ‘and purposes of such progrys, on the impact of cloud seeding on precipitation and severe storms, and on the types of chemicals used for seeding and their effect on the--environment. We also ob- tained dafa cdncerning the extent of cloud seeding conducted over Pennsylvania. Our review was conducted at various Federal departments ’ and agencies headquartered in Washington, D.C., and at cer- tain of their field offices in Colorado and Montana. We in- terviewed cognizant agency officials and reviewed appropriate records and files of the agencies. In addition, we reviewed pertinent reports and documentation of the Federal Council for Science and Technology, the National Academy of Sciences, and the National Water Commission. BACKGROUND AND COST DATA Several Federal agencies support weather modification programs which involve cloud-seeding activities. Major re- search programs include precipitation modification, fog and cloud modification, hail suppression, and lightning and hur- ricane modification. Statistics compiled by the Interdepartmental Committee for Atmospheric Sciences showed that costs for federally spon- sored weather modification rograms during fiscal years 1959 through 1970 totaled about %‘74 million; estimated costs for fiscal years 1971 and 1972 totaled about $35 million.
    [Show full text]
  • Lab 1: Electric Charge
    LAB 1: ELECTRIC CHARGE Equipment List: Electrometer (ES-9078A) Charge producers (ES-9057B) - the wands with dark and white disks on the ends Proof plane - wand with aluminum coated disk on the end Faraday ice pail (ES-9042A) Signal input cable for electrometer - has two alligator clips Black banana lead - grounding cable for electrometer DC power supply (Pasco) - only used for ground port Three prong power cable - for DC power supply Purpose: To explore charge, charge transfer, and charge conservation. Introduction: As with all experiments in this course, please proceed with caution. If you are ever uncertain, please ask for advice. If your equipment starts emitting a continuous beeping sound, disconnect it immediately and ask for help. For many experiments, including the electrostatic charge experiments, there are only a few sets of equipment which are used by many classes. If the equipment is broken, it will affect many other students and it will not be possible to replace it for some time because it is expensive. Please use the equipment with care. In this lab you will create a charge imbalance on the charge producers and use the Faraday ice pail and electrometer to measure this charge. Make sure to answer the questions posed in this lab in your lab book. The Faraday ice pail is a double layer Faraday cage. (Michael Faraday used a metal ice bucket in his original experiment.) When a charged object is placed inside the inner cage, free charge flows within the wires of the inner cage to neutralize this charge on the inside surface of the cage, leaving a residual charge on the outside of the inner cage that is equal to the charge placed inside the cage.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating Biophysical and Eco-Cultural Fire in Canada Doi: 10.4996/Fireecology.0701074 Page 74
    Fire Ecology Volume 7, Issue 1, 2011 White et al.: Integrating Biophysical and Eco-Cultural Fire in Canada doi: 10.4996/fireecology.0701074 Page 74 FORUM ARTICLE BURNING AT THE EDGE: INTEGRATING BIOPHYSICAL AND ECO-CULTURAL FIRE PROCESSES IN CANADA’S PARKS AND PROTECTED AREAS Clifford A. White1*, Daniel D.B. Perrakis2, Victor G. Kafka3, and Timothy Ennis4 1Parks Canada Agency, P.O. Box 900, Banff National Park, Banff, Alberta, Canada T1L 1K2 2 British Columbia Ministry of Natural Resource Operations, Wildfire Management Branch, P.O. Box 9502 Station Provincial Government Victoria, British Columbia, Canada V8W 9C1 3Parks Canada Agency, Ecosystem Conservation Service, 3 passage du Chien d’Or, C.P. 6060, Haute-Ville, Québec, Province of Québec, Canada G1R 4V7 4 Nature Conservancy of Canada, 200-825 Broughton Street, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada V8W 1E5 *Corresponding author: Tel.: 001-403-760-0203; e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Currently, high intensity, large-area lightning fires that burn during droughts dominate Canada’s fire regimes. However, studies from several disciplines clearly show that hu- mans historically ignited burns within this matrix of large fires. Two approaches for fire research and management have arisen from this pattern: a “large-fire biophysical para- digm” related to lightning-ignited fires, and an “eco-cultural paradigm” related to human- caused burning. Working at the edge between biophysically driven fires and eco-cultural burns, and their associated management and research paradigms, presents unique chal- lenges to land managers. We proceed by describing fire frequency trends across Canada, and how an interaction between changing climatic and cultural factors may provide better causal explanations for observed patterns than either group of factors alone.
    [Show full text]