Sarasota County Area Transit

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sarasota County Area Transit SARASOTA COUNTY AREA TRANSIT Comprehensive Operations Analysis Draft Report Prepared as part of: Sarasota Transportation Enhancement Plan Prepared by: July 1999 The Venice Foundation 601 Tamiami Trail South, Suite B Venice, Florida 34285 (941) 486-4600 Sarasota County Area Transit (SCAT) 5303 Pinkney Avenue Sarasota, Florida 34233 (941) 316-1007 Sarasota-Manatee Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) 7632 301 Boulevard Sarasota, Florida 34243 (941) 359-5772 Center for Urban Transportation Research (CUTR) University of South Florida College of Engineering 4202 E. Fowler Avenue, CUT 100 Tampa, Florida 33620-5375 (813) 974-3120 SCAT COMPREHENSIVE OPERATIONS ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE SECTION I 1 INTRODUCTION 1 THE PURPOSE FOR A SERVICE PLANNING PROCESS 2 SERVICE DESIGN STRATEGY 3 THE RECOMMENDED SYSTEM NETWORK – A “VALUE-ADDED” APPROACH 4 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS AND MONITORING 5 SECTION II 8 HISTORY OF SCAT’S FIXED ROUTE SERVICE 8 DESCRIPTION OF SCAT FIXED ROUTE SERVICES 9 SECTION III 12 INTRODUCTION 12 ROUTE 1-FRUITVILLE ROAD 13 ROUTE 2-ART SCHOOL 16 ROUTE 3-PINECRAFT 18 ROUTE 4-LIDO 20 ROUTE 5-OSPREY/SWIFT 22 ROUTE 6-BENEVA 25 ROUTE 7-NEWTOWN/NE PLAZA 27 ROUTE 8-NEWTOWN/301 29 ROUTE 9-NORTH PORT 32 ROUTE 11-SIESTA KEY 34 ROUTE 12-NORTH LOCKWOOD 37 ROUTE 13-VENICE 39 ROUTE 14-BEE RIDGE 41 ROUTE 15-AIRPORT/CATTLEMEN 43 ROUTE 17-TRAIL 49 ROUTE 18-LONGBOAT 52 SARASOTA TROLLEY 54 PROPOSED SERVICE (NEW ROUTES/SERVICE ENHANCEMENTS) 56 DRAFT C.O.A. i SCAT COMPREHENSIVE OPERATIONS ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) APPENDIX PAGE A SCAT FY 1997-98 QUARTERLY SUMMARY A-1 B SCAT OPERATOR SURVEY ANALYSIS B-1 C WEEKDAY RIDECHECK DATA C-1 D TRANSFER MATRIX D-1 E ON-TIME PERFORMANCE DATA E-1 LIST OF FIGURES Figure II-1 SCAT FIXED ROUTES 11 Figure III-1 PROPOSED SCAT FIXED ROUTES 58 Figure III-2 PROPOSED RT 10–PROCTOR RD./CLARK RD./S. MCINTOSH RD. 59 Figure III-3 PROPOSED ROUTE 20-NORTHWEST VENICE/LAUREL 60 Figure III-4 PROPOSED EVENING SERVICE 61 LIST OF TABLES Table II-1 DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT FIXED ROUTES 10 Table III-1 FY 2000 SERVICE RECOMMENDATIONS SUMMARY OF DESCRIPTIONS 62 Table III-2 FY 2000 SERVICE RECOMMENDATIONS COST SUMMARY 63 DRAFT C.O.A. ii SCAT COMPREHENSIVE OPERATIONS ANALYSIS SECTION I INTRODUCTION Providing transit service to a large, geographically dispersed, and demographically diverse community such as Sarasota County is a difficult prospect. In particular, the street network and barrier island bridges present serious challenges to traffic as well as bus circulation. Regional traffic congestion slows travel times for all modes of transportation utilizing the road network. Tourists and recreational travelers contribute significantly to a lack of reliability in both auto and bus travel times, particularly during peak travel periods and throughout the winter months. In addition, economic and other demographic characteristics promote a high degree of travel between communities for home to work and work to home trips. In 1998, Sarasota County Area Transit (SCAT) requested assistance from the Center for Urban Transportation Research (CUTR) to review SCAT’s operations in order to identify how the transit system could improve ridership. In the transit industry, such a review is called a Comprehensive Operations Analysis (COA). The purpose of a COA is to provide an independent analysis that includes recommendations concerning service modifications/expansions. The analysis covers those aspects of service that generally are not visible to the riding public, such as master route schedules, operator work assignments, on-time performance, route productivity in terms of ridership and revenue, and network-level routing and route segmentation. Prior to conducting the COA, and as part of the Sarasota Transportation Enhancement Plan (STEP) process, CUTR met with SCAT staff, the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), the Citizen Advisory Board (CAB), and County Commissioners. CUTR also conducted a survey of SCAT bus operators. These activities were designed to familiarize CUTR with SCAT’s overall operations to form the foundation for subsequent tasks. A majority of the concerns expressed by each of the groups were addressed in this report. CUTR performed a “ridecheck” of all routes and all corresponding trips in the system. A ridecheck consists of placing an individual on board each vehicle to count passenger boardings and deboardings for each bus stop of a route, as well as collect other operational data. Analyses of existing conditions of SCAT’s fixed route services identified three primary service deficiencies that are impacting operational performance and growth opportunities. These deficiencies include: · Circuitous routing that inhibits direct passenger travel, · Low service frequency, and · Poor on-time performance. DRAFT C.O.A. 1 SCAT COMPREHENSIVE OPERATIONS ANALYSIS As a result, CUTR is recommending service modifications at the route level for many routes in SCAT’s system. The scope of recommendations includes route geographic coverage, service hours (span of service), revenue hours, route frequencies, new routes, transfers and overall system connectivity. Recommendations are not constrained by existing financial resources in order to give SCAT management a comprehensive service plan to be implemented with new revenues if they become available. THE PURPOSE FOR A SERVICE PLANNING PROCESS The overriding goal of the SCAT transit system is to serve the greatest number of existing and potential transit customers within the resources available. This can be achieved by designing a system that is reliable, user-friendly, and best suited to travel patterns in Sarasota County, thereby increasing the value of the transit resources already devoted to the public. The service planning function is one critical component in SCAT’s ability to achieve its primary goal. In general, the objective of any service planning function in a transit agency is to: Provide for a continuous process by which service modifications can be made to the transit system on an ongoing basis to accommodate changing conditions relative to the provision of service. Changing conditions addressed in the service planning process may include (but are not limited to) frequency improvements resulting from bus overloads, running time modifications as a result of changing traffic conditions, reduced or enhanced funding, public requests for service, new transit-oriented development, and road construction. SCAT’s ongoing service planning process includes service modifications each time bus operators bid on work assignments. Service modifications only occur when there are changing conditions such as a recent increase in funding to expand frequency on certain system routes. Proposed service changes were gathered from staff and bus operators to be included as part of this COA. This COA is a major step in influencing the service planning process at SCAT for the next few years. The activities occurring in this COA are normally conducted on a smaller scale over time. When a comprehensive study is conducted, it then establishes a process by which the transit system can implement changes and evaluate the success and performance of those changes over time. Service design considerations for CUTR’s analysis and ultimate recommendations, resulting from data gathering and local interviews, include: · Improve on-time performance and system reliability. · Make the service more frequent and direct. DRAFT C.O.A. 2 SCAT COMPREHENSIVE OPERATIONS ANALYSIS · Make the system more user friendly · Improve connections between routes. This report will create an opportunity for all parties mentioned above to work together to contribute to improved system performance. Although this report is designed to provide an objective foundation on which to make structural changes in service provision, it will also be a fluid process that will help SCAT implement improvements in accordance with other local conditions. SERVICE DESIGN STRATEGY Transit service design is always a delicate balance of three essential components: · Productivity - generating the largest number of passenger trips. · Coverage - serving appropriate geographic areas of the community. · Public Support - being responsive to customers and the community in meeting mobility needs. In order to manage the delicate balances and achieve the objectives presented in the section above, CUTR has devised strategies in service design to maximize SCAT’s performance, as indicated below. · Improve on-time performance and system reliability. · Running time adjustments by time of day and season of the year · Training/re-training bus operator on effective schedule adherence · Reduce layover (non-productive) time at end of lines to conform as much as practicable to industry standards · Make the system more frequent and direct. · Eliminate unproductive route deviations · Increase number of buses serving routes · Reduce overall running time · Reduce overall passenger travel time DRAFT C.O.A. 3 SCAT COMPREHENSIVE OPERATIONS ANALYSIS · Make the system more user friendly. · Improve system map and public schedules · Increase number of shelters throughout system · Install new fare boxes to accommodate prepaid fare instruments · Improve connections between routes. · Strengthen existing and create new timed-transfers THE RECOMMENDED SYSTEM NETWORK – A “VALUE-ADDED” APPROACH A “value-added” approach is a concept wherein the value of a product or service is increased without substantially increasing the cost of that product or service. Improving the farebox to accommodate
Recommended publications
  • PART 1 BDV25 TWO977-25 Task 2B Delive
    EVALUATION OF SELF CONSOLIDATING CONCRETE AND CLASS IV CONCRETE FLOW IN DRILLED SHAFTS – PART 1 BDV25 TWO977-25 Task 2b Deliverable – Field Exploratory Evaluation of Existing Bridges with Drilled Shaft Foundations Submitted to The Florida Department of Transportation Research Center 605 Suwannee Street, MS30 Tallahassee, FL 32399 [email protected] Submitted by Sarah J. Mobley, P.E., Doctoral Student Kelly Costello, E.I., Doctoral Candidate and Principal Investigators Gray Mullins, Ph.D., P.E., Professor, PI Abla Zayed, Ph.D., Professor, Co-PI Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of South Florida 4202 E. Fowler Avenue, ENB 118 Tampa, FL 33620 (813) 974-5845 [email protected] January, 2017 to July, 2017 Preface This deliverable is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements set forth and agreed upon at the onset of the project and indicates a degree of completion. It also serves as an interim report of the research progress and findings as they pertain to the individual task-based goals that comprise the overall project scope. Herein, the FDOT project manager’s approval and guidance are sought regarding the applicability of the intermediate research findings and the subsequent research direction. The project tasks, as outlined in the scope of services, are presented below. The subject of the present report is highlighted in bold. Task 1. Literature Review (pages 3-90) Task 2a. Exploratory Evaluation of Previously Cast Lab Shaft Specimens (page 91-287) Task 2b. Field Exploratory Evaluation of Existing Bridges with Drilled Shaft Foundations Task 3. Corrosion Potential Evaluations Task 4. Porosity and Hydration Products Determinations Task 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Robyn Miller
    mommy ® magazine Bring On Secrets to a The New Spontaneous Family Year Getaway Perfect Parenting Resolutions Rock Out! Climbing the Outdoor Elevator The Sound and the (again and again and again) (Four-Year-Old) Fury at Shamrock Park Music Compound and Nature Center Where DO In this issue: • Birth Stories Babies Come • Preschool Foodies • Social Development From, Daddy? for Babies Timing the Big Talk Your Family’s Local Survival Guide Jan/Feb 2018 Welcome to the Club send us a photo and info about your baby (up to 1 year old) to: [email protected] Seager James Anthony Blackwell Ziggy Michael Carlson Born June 1st 2017 Born August 10, 2017 Weighed 6lb. 15oz. 20.25in long. He was welcomed by his loving parents Welcomed by his joyful parents and Shaun and Jen Carlson and his big siblings proud big brother Maverick Arabella, Dillon, and Declan Your baby's birth story, IN PRINT! Where your faith is just as important as your SAT scores. Layne Elizabeth Hall From the moment you step onto our campus, you’re welcomed Born June 24, 2017 into a nurturing and positive learning environment. Fully Welcomed by parents David and Kaleigh Hall accredited, our challenging, comprehensive curriculum is interwoven with Biblical truth and values of honor, character, integrity, self-discipline, diversity, and kindness. Let's talk about birth, baby. Long labor, short labor, C-section, or adoption? Experience a school Committed to Christ & Academic Excellence. Hospital, birth center, at home, or in a taxi? OPEN HOUSE Every mom has at least one good story about it! Let us January 25th | 6:30-8:00pm know if you're willing to be interviewed: An Exceptional Christ-centered Education • Pre-K through 12th Grade 5415 Bahia Vista Street, Sarasota, FL 34232 • SarasotaChristian.org [email protected] 941-371-6481 ext.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Committee Meeting
    Agenda Policy Committee Meeting Friday, March 15,2002 1:00 P.M. Sarasota Bradenton International Airport 6000 Airport Circle Sarasota, Florida 34243 Airport Authority Boardroom Welcome, Introductions Approval of Minutes from October 26,2002 Meeting Director's Report Mark Alderson -3 N. Tamiami Trail e EPA Bi-ennial Review . .e 104 1. Public Involvement and Education Scott Carpenter Sarasota, FL 34234 Proposal 2. Proposed Technical ProjectsLJpdate Gary Raulerson 3. Sea Grass Reporting Gary Raulerson 4. Discussion of Proposed FY03 Work Plan Mark Alderson 5. Results - Atmospheric Deposition Study Kellie Dixon and Red Tide 6. Financial Status Report Marian Pomeroy Adjourn MINUTES POLICY COMMITTEE MEETING Friday, October 26,2001 1:00 p.m. Sarasota Bradenton International Airport 6000 Airport Circle Sarasota Florida 34243 Airport Authority Boardroom Present: Policy Committee Members Mr. Bo Crum, E.P.A. Reg. IV, Chief, Coastal Program The Honorable Richard Martin, Sarasota City Commissioner P\ Ms. Ce Ce McKiernan, Dept. of Environmental Protection Ms. Deborah Getzoff, FDEP The Honorable Pat Glass, Manatee Board of County Commissioners The Honorable Jon Thaxton, Sarasota Board of County Commissioners Mr. Bruce Wirth, P.E., Director, Resource Management Department Management Committee Members Mr. Mike McNees, City Manager, City of Sarasota Mr. Paul Bispham, Citizens Advisory (:onunittee Mr. Annon Bozeman, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Mr. Mark Harnrnond, Manager, SWIM, SWFWMD Mr. George Henderson, Florida Marine Research Institute Mr. Charles Hunsicker, Manatee County Office of Administration Mr. Rob Patten, Sarasota County Environmental Services Ms. Felicia Robinson, U.S. Region IV Mr. John Stevely, Florida Sea Grant Sarasota Bay National Estuary Program Staff Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Destination Strategic Plan 2025 JLL Tourism & Destinations Practice
    Hotels & Hospitality | 2019 Sarasota County Destination Strategic Plan 2025 JLL Tourism & Destinations Practice DAN FENTON DAVID HOLDER BETHANIE DEROSE Executive Vice President Vice President Senior Associate +1 (408) 309-3450 +1 (315) 569-8908 +1 (609) 457-5361 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Table of Contents 5 | Executive Summary 9 | Background 15 | State of Sarasota County Tourism 27 | Destination Strategic Plan Priorities & Recommendations 57 | Direction of Visit Sarasota County 69 | Conclusion 71 | Appendix 4 Visit Sarasota: Destination Strategic Plan Priorities + Recommendations Visit Sarasota: Destination Strategic Plan Priorities + Recommendations 5 Section 1: Executive Summary Visit Sarasota County (VSC) recognizes that the future of Sarasota County depends on having an innovative strategic plan shaped by visitor research, analysis and thoughtful consideration of input from stakeholders and partners across the county. To accomplish this work, VSC partnered with JLL's Tourism practice, an international tourism and destinations consulting group, to assemble a comprehensive destination plan that would build off the efforts and accomplishments since the organization’s 2020 strategic planning initiative and identified goals. Specifically, by 2025, VSC seeks to: • Ensure funding and program development are aligned among VSC, its partners, government entities, non-profits and meets long-term goals of the community • Assess gaps in the tourism, sports, cultural infrastructure to identify potential new or enhanced tourism demand generators. • Recommend actions and activities to increase visitor flow across all segments (leisure, meetings, sports). • Review the effectiveness of VSC’s marketing programs and recommendations to improve these initiatives. Examine VSC impact compared to its direct competitors with their much larger budgets.
    [Show full text]
  • Outstanding Bridges of Florida*
    2013 OOUUTTSSTTAANNDDIINNGG BBRRIIDDGGEESS OOFF FFLLOORRIIDDAA** This photograph collection was compiled by Steven Plotkin, P.E. RReeccoorrdd HHoollddeerrss UUnniiqquuee EExxaammpplleess SSuuppeerriioorr AAeesstthheettiiccss * All bridges in this collection are on the State Highway System or on public roads Record Holders Longest Total Length: Seven Mile Bridge, Florida Keys Second Longest Total Length: Sunshine Skyway Bridge, Lower Tampa Bay Third Longest Total Length: Bryant Patton Bridge, Saint George Island Most Single Bridge Lane Miles: Sunshine Skyway Bridge, Lower Tampa Bay Most Dual Bridge Lane Miles: Henry H. Buckman Bridge, South Jacksonville Longest Viaduct (Bridge over Land): Lee Roy Selmon Crosstown Expressway, Tampa Longest Span: Napoleon Bonaparte Broward Bridge at Dames Point, North Jacksonville Second Longest Span: Sunshine Skyway Bridge, Lower Tampa Bay Longest Girder/Beam Span: St. Elmo W. Acosta Bridge, Jacksonville Longest Cast-In-Place Concrete Segmental Box Girder Span: St. Elmo W. Acosta Bridge, Jacksonville Longest Precast Concrete Segmental Box Girder Span and Largest Precast Concrete Segment: Hathaway Bridge, Panama City Longest Concrete I Girder Span: US-27 at the Caloosahatchee River, Moore Haven Longest Steel Box Girder Span: Regency Bypass Flyover on Arlington Expressway, Jacksonville Longest Steel I Girder Span: New River Bridge, Ft. Lauderdale Longest Moveable Vertical Lift Span: John T. Alsop, Jr. Bridge (Main Street), Jacksonville Longest Movable Bascule Span: 2nd Avenue, Miami SEVEN MILE BRIDGE (new bridge on left and original remaining bridge on right) RECORD: Longest Total Bridge Length (6.79 miles) LOCATION: US-1 from Knights Key to Little Duck Key, Florida Keys SUNSHINE SKYWAY BRIDGE RECORDS: Second Longest Span (1,200 feet), Second Longest Total Bridge Length (4.14 miles), Most Single Bridge Lane Miles (20.7 miles) LOCATION: I–275 over Lower Tampa Bay from St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transportation Support Document
    The Transportation Support Document The inventory and analysis in the Support Document provides the foundation for the Plan portion of this Chapter. The Support Document is not adopted. INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS Overview This Transportation Chapter considers the physical and spatial needs of a City that is over 100 years of age and which is the home of approximately 54,639 year-round inhabitants. The City contains over 500 miles of roadway under the jurisdiction of the Florida Department of Transportation, Sarasota County and local City streets. The City participates in the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) with other municipalities in Sarasota and Manatee counties. Fourteen bus routes, operated and managed by Sarasota County Area Transit (SCAT), operate within the City of Sarasota. The City includes 83.65 miles of designated bike lanes/routes and almost 16 miles of trails. The Inventory and Analysis of the Transportation Chapter is the data and information that underlies the City’s policies for maintaining and improving the City’s transportation infrastructure. A major issue, as identified by the Evaluation and Appraisal Report, is Transportation Mobility in the Downtown Environment. The City of Sarasota must make a policy decision regarding the Transportation Concurrency Exception Area and implementation of the Downtown Sarasota Mobility Study and Downtown Parking Master Plan. The Inventory and Analysis section is organized as follows: Roadway Functional Classification Thoroughfare Plan Concurrency Transportation Systems Management
    [Show full text]
  • The Legacy of John Ringling and the American Circus
    University of Massachusetts Boston ScholarWorks at UMass Boston Graduate Masters Theses Doctoral Dissertations and Masters Theses 5-2020 Beyond the Big Top: The Legacy of John Ringling and the American Circus Casey L. Nemec Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umb.edu/masters_theses Part of the United States History Commons BEYOND THE BIG TOP: THE LEGACY OF JOHN RINGLING AND THE AMERICAN CIRCUS A Thesis Presented By CASEY L. NEMEC Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies, University of Massachusetts Boston, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS May 2020 History Program © 2020 by Casey L. Nemec All rights reserved BEYOND THE BIG TOP: THE LEGACY OF JOHN RINGLING AND THE AMERICAN CIRCUS A Thesis Presented By CASEY L. NEMEC Approved as to style and content by: Vincent J. Cannato, Associate Professor Chairperson of Committee Timothy Hacsi, Associate Professor Member Roberta Wollons, Professor Member Elizabeth McCahill, Program Director History Program Timothy Hacsi, Chair History Department ABSTRACT BEYOND THE BIG TOP: THE LEGACY OF JOHN RINGLING AND THE AMERICAN CIRCUS MAY 2020 Casey L. Nemec, B.A., Florida Gulf Coast University M.A., University of Massachusetts Boston Directed by Professor Vincent J. Cannato Beyond the Big Top: The Legacy of John Ringling and the American Circus is a focused interpretation of the impact of the American circus post-Civil War through present day, most particularly that of circus impresario, corporate magnate, and philanthropist John Ringling, in what was once a quiet Florida fishing village named Sarasota. It is my observation that John Ringling, through moving the winter quarters of the Ringling Brothers and Barnum & Bailey to Sarasota, investing in a sizable amount of real estate, and spearheading a campaign to bring a world-class art museum and school to the area, played a key role in shaping Florida tourism, diversity, expanding cultural awareness, and boosting the local economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Bay Bottom Habitat Assessment
    BAY BOTTOM HABITAT ASSESSMENT DRAFT FINAL REPORT Prepared for: Sarasota Bay National Estuary Program 1550 Thompson Parkway Sarasota, FL 34236 Prepared by: J.K. Culter and J.R. Leverone Mote Marine Laboratory 1600 Thompson Parkway Sarasota, FL 34236 March l2, 1993 Mote Marine Laboratory Technical Report No. 303 Suggested reference Culter JK, Leverone JR. 1993. Bay bottom habitat assessment: Final report draft. Sarasota Bay National Estuary Program. Mote Marine Laboratory Technical Report no 303. 69 p. and appendices. Available from: Mote Marine Laboratory Library. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Table of Contents i List of Figures ii List of Tables iv I. Executive Summary 1 II. Project Background 4 III. Introduction 5 IV. Bottom Habitat Description 7 V. Submerged Aquatic Vegetation 25 VI. Surficial Sediment Analysis 45 VII. Mapping Analysis 55 VIII. Conclusions and Recommendations 65 IX. References 67 APPENDICES: Appendix A. Maps of seagrass distribution based on interpretation of aerial photography. Appendix B. Maps of disturbed bay bottom based on interpretation of aerial photography. Appendix C. Maps of sediment sampling sites and corresponding surface sediment grain size composition. i LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 4.1. Sarasota Bay segmentation scheme adopted for the Sarasota Bay Program. 10 Figure 5.1. Seagrass station locations. 28 Figure 5.2. Halodule biomass (grams dry weight/square meter) from five Sarasota Bay seagrass stations during winter, 1990. 34 Figure 5.3 Halodule biomass (grams dry weight/square meter) from five Sarasota Bay seagrass stations during summer, 1990. 35 Figure 5.4. Seasonal differences in Halodule blade biomass (grams dry weight/square meter) for six Sarasota Bay seagrass stations.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SARASOTA Vol
    THE SARASOTA Vol. 2, No. 29 — April 4, 2014 COVER News Leader NO ZOMBIES INCLUDED ‘THE TIMES THEY ARE A-CHANGIN’’ ROOFTOP DINING IDEA SCRAPPED Inside Old school journalism. 21st century delivery. GET TO HELP KNOW US A.K.A. HELP MASTHEAD Rachel Brown Hackney Cleve Posey Editor and Publisher Production Manager / Graphic Designer [email protected] [email protected] Cooper Levey-Baker Robert S. Hackney Associate Editor Opinion Editor / General Manager [email protected] [email protected] Stan Zimmerman Advertising Sales City Editor [email protected] [email protected] Subscription Services Roger Drouin [email protected] County Editor Press Releases & News Tips [email protected] [email protected] Norman Schimmel Staff Photographer [email protected] Fran Palmeri Contributing Writer [email protected] Harriet Cuthbert Contributing Writer [email protected] Elinor Rogosin A&E Writer [email protected] John Riley Editorial Cartoonist [email protected] Vicki Chatley Copy Editor [email protected] Letters To the Editor [email protected] “The Sarasota News Leader” is a registered trademark of New Sheriff Publishing, Inc., which publishes The Sarasota News Leader. Copyright © 2014 Sarasota News Leader. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Member - National Digital Press Association • P.O. Box 5099 • Sarasota, FL 34277 • (941) 227-1080 WELCOME It seems safe to say the No. 1 topic in the news this week is the joint meeting of the City and County commissions to discuss plans for a homeless shelter.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibits and Experiences by Category
    Health & Well-being Location Organization Potter Building A Better Solution Potter Building Adjust Your Life Chiropractic Robarts Arena All Faiths Food Bank EXHIBITS AND EXPERIENCES Outside Alzheimer's Association Outside American Cancer Society Robarts Arena Approved Home Health BY CATEGORY Robarts Arena Area Agency on Aging for Southwest Florida Outside Bite Squad Potter Building bodyMIND Wellness Centre Potter Building CAE Healthcare Potter Building CapTel Outreach Potter Building Catholic Charities, Diocese of Venice The Age-Friendly Festival is presented by Outside CircuSoul Yoga Studio The Patterson Foundation as a gift to the community. Robarts Arena Doctors Hospital of Sarasota Potter Building EliteHealth Robarts Arena Florida Department of Children and Families Outside Florida Department of Health in Sarasota County Housing Robarts Arena Friendship Centers Location Organization Potter Building Garden of Heart Yoga Center Robarts Arena 101 Mobility Robarts Arena Goodwill Manasota Potter Building Alderman Oaks Retirement Residence Robarts Arena Health & Well-being Reflection Lounge Potter Building Aviva Outside Hearing Loss Association of America- Sarasota-Manatee Chapter Robarts Arena Housing Reflection Lounge Robarts Arena JCFS of the Suncoast Robarts Arena Living in Community Network Outside Lighthouse of Manasota Potter Building Poet's Walk Robarts Arena Meals on Wheels of Sarasota Robarts Arena Pines of Sarasota Rehabilitation and Senior Care Community Robarts Arena National Council on Aging Robarts Arena Sarasota County Planning
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    FINAL REPORT December 4, 2017 FINAL REPORT Climate Adaptation Plan Contents List of Appendices .................................................................................iv Project Team ............................................................................................v Message from the City Manager .........................................................v Sarasota City Commission ....................................................................vi Key Terms ..............................................................................................viii Acronyms ................................................................................................ix Introduction ............................................................. 1 Regional Landscape ................................................................................2 Past, Present, and Future Climate Change ........................................................... 4 Infrastructure Vulnerability Study .......................................................5 STEP 1 – Identify Climate Projections .............. 7 Climate Science .......................................................................................8 Sea Level Rise ................................................................................................................. 8 Observational Sea Level Rise – Global ..............................................................................................9 Observational Sea Level Rise – Local ...............................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • The Meadoword, November 2012
    November 2012 Volume 30, Number 11 The To FREE Meadoword MeaThe doword PUBLISHED BY THE MEADOWS CO mm UNITY ASSO C IATION TO PROVIDE INFOR M ATION AND EDU C ATION FOR MEADOWS RESIDENTS MANASOTA, MANASOTA, FL U.S. POSTAGE PRESORTED STANDARD PERMIT 61 PAID 2 The Meadoword • November 2012 MCA BOARD Notes From the OF DIRECTORS Ginny Coveney, President Bob Friedlander, Vice President President’s Desk Dr. Bill Grubb, Treasurer By Ginny Coveney—MCA President Bill Hoegel, Secretary Joy Howes Jo Evans Many of you have commented on (MHOA) has five delegates, each with one mobile in the parking lot! John Spillane what a big job it is being president. I can vote. Out-parcels—such as The Meadows There is a great need for donors to Dr. Harry Shannon tell you that it is made much easier and Country Club, The Meadows Shopping donate blood for newborn babies, cancer Marvin Glusman less time consuming by the wonderful Village, Tarpon Point, and Kobernick- patients, and surgical or accident patients staff we have that does the work. The Anchin—each have one delegate. who require blood replacement. COMMITTEES board just oversees that work. Delegates are appointed by the Because of illness, deaths, and Assembly of Property Owners And, because everything runs so individual association presidents to attend relocations, many of our dedicated donors Claire Coyle, Chairperson smoothly, residents often become involved the monthly meetings to report back to from the past are no longer available. We Marvin Glusman, Liaison in their own lives and do not seem to the associations any business and to allow need new donors to replace them.
    [Show full text]