U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic And U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE MISSOURI BASIN RIVER FORECAST CENTER 1803 NORTH 7 HIGHWAY PLEASANT HILL, MISSOURI 64080 MONTHLY PRECIPITATION DATA ALBERTA 2019-2020 STATION NAME MO% S% OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP BEAVER MINES M M 1.77 2.68 0.89 0.51 1.25 2.17 1.74 M CARDSTON M M 2.57 M M M M M 1.32 M CARWAY M M 0.67 1.06 0.08 0.31 0.37 0.90 1.06 M FOREMOST M M M M 0.38 M M M 0.48 M LETHBRIDGE M M M 0.10 0.11 0.05 0.11 0.17 0.72 M LETHBRIDGE A M M 0.49 M 0.10 0.23 0.11 0.22 0.61 M MASINASIN M M M 1.63 0.43 0.35 0.33 0.32 0.68 M MEDICINE HAT A M M 0.22 0.43 0.07 0.48 0.47 0.10 0.39 M PICTURE BUTTE W M M 0.52 M M M M M 1.12 M PINCHER CREEK A M M 0.69 0.65 0.13 0.27 0.13 M 1.02 M SCHULER M M M M M M M M 0.26 M VAUXHALL NORTH M M 1.61 0.59 0.08 0.03 0.07 0.03 0.06 M WATERTON PRK GTE M M M M M M M M 1.84 M BRITISH COLUMBIA 2019-2020 STATION NAME MO% S% OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP CRANBROOK A M M 0.65 0.56 1.13 0.90 0.32 0.71 0.55 M FERNIE M M M 1.48 M M 2.87 M M M SPARWOOD M M 1.71 0.78 2.86 1.98 M M M M COLORADO 2019-2020 STATION NAME MO% S% OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP ARAPAHO RIDGE M M 3.30 2.30 4.80 3.10 4.70 3.70 3.60 M AKRON 4 E M M 0.51 1.10 0.08 0.16 0.26 0.65 0.39 M ALAMOSA 2S M M 0.05 0.44 0.55 0.14 0.14 0.06 0.14 M ALAMOSA SAN LUIS M M 0.07 0.45 0.51 0.12 0.12 0.22 0.09 M ANTERO RSVR M M M 0.88 0.54 0.00 0.42 0.80 0.07 M ARAPAHOE M M 0.30 M 0.79 M 0.52 M M M ARAPAHOE 12S M M 0.57 0.44 0.62 0.14 1.42 0.93 0.20 M BAILEY M M M 0.91 0.34 0.23 1.62 1.07 M M BEAR LAKE M M 3.80 2.70 1.80 2.50 4.00 4.10 5.20 M BEAR RIVER M M 2.70 1.30 2.10 2.00 3.60 1.70 2.20 M BEARTOWN 23 68 1.00 4.30 5.10 1.40 2.90 4.40 0.80 0.60 BERTHOUD SUMMIT M M 3.90 2.20 3.90 4.00 6.10 3.50 5.20 M BISON LAKE M M 2.10 2.10 4.30 4.00 4.30 5.00 2.70 M BLACK CANYON GUN M M 0.88 1.96 1.12 1.17 0.91 1.90 0.41 M BLUE MESA LAKE M M 0.67 M M 1.12 0.40 0.47 0.11 M BONHAM RSVR M M 1.00 2.00 3.50 2.25 1.75 3.75 M M BRECKENRIDGE M M M M M M M M 2.23 M BRIGGSDALE M M 0.56 M 0.94 M M 2.38 0.84 M BRIGHTON 3 SE M M 0.80 0.85 0.10 0.06 0.89 1.45 0.98 M BRUMLEY 75 84 2.00 1.70 2.20 1.50 3.00 1.30 1.50 1.70 BUCKHORN MTN 1E M M M M M M 1.15 M 1.92 M BUCKSKIN JOE 52 104 2.80 2.00 3.00 1.40 3.60 2.20 2.00 1.00 BUENA VISTA 2S M M 0.84 0.78 0.76 0.24 0.24 0.71 0.10 M BUFFALO PARK M M 2.60 1.50 3.40 3.20 5.60 1.90 3.10 M BURLINGTON M M 0.33 0.74 0.38 0.44 0.23 0.73 0.20 M BURLINGTON CARSO M M 0.01 0.03 0.38 0.32 0.06 0.57 0.11 M BURRO MOUNTAIN 33 73 2.10 1.90 2.30 4.20 3.40 3.00 1.90 1.00 BUTTE M M 1.20 1.30 3.00 1.60 2.20 3.10 1.20 M BYERS 5 ENE M M 0.95 0.99 M M M M M M CABIN CREEK M M 1.79 1.26 1.26 0.48 3.57 1.82 1.62 M CAMPO 7 S M M 0.39 0.30 0.58 0.22 0.22 0.18 0.31 M CANON CITY M M 1.60 0.64 0.47 1.47 1.47 0.72 0.48 M CASCADE 23 70 0.70 4.20 4.80 1.60 0.90 3.90 0.50 0.40 CASCADE #2 20 71 0.70 3.50 4.90 1.60 1.00 3.70 0.60 0.30 CASTLE ROCK M M M 0.84 M 0.17 M 1.49 0.57 M CEDAREDGE 3 E M M M 1.51 M M 0.31 2.03 0.22 M CHEESMAN M M 1.22 0.76 0.45 0.31 1.26 1.29 0.67 M CHERAW 1 N M M 0.79 0.42 0.32 0.00 0.70 0.16 0.08 M CIMARRON M M 0.37 1.68 0.86 0.90 0.25 1.09 0.72 M CLIMAX M M 2.54 0.96 2.72 1.64 3.57 2.41 2.52 M COCHETOPA PASS 0 66 0.70 3.40 3.80 2.90 0.90 5.10 1.40 0.00 COLLBRAN 2SW M M 0.79 0.86 0.58 0.85 0.34 1.59 0.37 M COLORADO NM M M 0.00 0.00 0.66 0.39 0.28 1.21 0.34 M COLORADO SPRINGS M M 0.82 0.90 0.32 0.62 0.62 0.99 0.86 M COLUMBINE M M 4.20 1.50 5.80 5.40 8.50 2.90 4.60 M COLUMBUS BASIN 12 74 0.70 6.10 8.20 2.60 1.00 5.70 0.30 0.30 COPELAND LAKE 38 100 3.50 2.10 1.70 0.90 3.00 2.90 4.20 1.10 COPPER MOUNTAIN M M 2.40 1.00 2.80 2.20 6.20 2.10 2.70 M CORTEZ M M 0.05 1.15 1.73 0.48 0.12 1.22 0.10 M CRAIG 4 SW M M 1.53 1.25 2.09 1.84 1.47 1.81 1.20 M CRESTED BUTTE M M 1.24 1.09 3.10 0.00 2.28 3.10 1.19 M CROSHO 46 104 2.90 1.30 2.80 3.90 4.10 2.10 3.30 1.20 DEADMAN HILL 71 92 3.40 2.30 2.10 2.10 3.50 2.80 3.40 2.40 DENVER WATER DEP M M 1.45 1.26 0.34 0.07 1.02 1.35 0.79 M DILLON 1 E M M 1.50 0.64 M 0.63 1.79 0.79 1.13 M DINOSAUR NATL MO M M M 0.83 M M M M 0.45 M DRY LAKE M M 4.60 2.20 4.30 5.20 5.60 2.70 3.60 M ECHO LAKE 41 74 2.10 1.50 1.50 0.40 2.60 2.10 2.00 1.10 EL DIENTE PEAK 24 72 0.70 3.60 4.60 2.20 1.10 4.00 1.30 0.60 ELK RIVER 61 85 2.20 1.80 3.00 4.00 4.60 2.00 2.30 1.70 EVERGREEN M M 2.02 1.55 0.34 M 1.94 1.79 1.32 M FLAGLER 1S M M 0.20 0.53 M M M 0.52 0.09 M FLATIRON RESERVO M M 1.20 1.92 0.16 0.02 1.41 1.37 1.92 M FLEMING 3SW M M M 0.46 0.15 M 0.12 M 1.04 M FRASER M M 1.64 0.81 1.71 M M M M M FREMONT PASS M M 2.90 1.30 3.30 2.40 4.10 2.50 2.70 M FRUITA M M 0.04 0.47 1.33 0.52 0.56 0.96 0.47 M FT COLLINS M M 0.94 1.79 0.57 0.00 0.69 1.29 1.71 M FT COLLINS 4 E M M 0.54 1.74 0.58 0.00 0.47 0.98 1.15 M FT LEWIS M M 0.33 1.57 2.78 0.55 0.42 2.17 0.00 M FT MORGAN M M 1.79 M M 0.16 0.28 0.95 1.35 M GATEWAY M M 0.01 1.42 1.40 0.54 0.18 1.61 0.28 M GLADE PARK 17W 17 72 0.08 1.61 1.12 0.71 0.79 2.39 0.25 0.19 GLEN COVE M M 2.40 1.70 0.60 1.10 1.80 1.90 1.60 M GLENWOOD SPGS #2 M M 0.74 0.77 1.61 1.16 M 1.35 0.59 M GOULD 4SE SFSP M M 2.51 M 2.89 1.62 5.42 M M M GRAND JUNCTION 6 M M 0.05 0.84 0.31 0.48 0.04 1.40 0.26 M GRAND JUNCTION W M M 0.02 0.87 0.55 0.51 0.07 1.45 0.20 M GRAND LAKE 1 NW M M 1.41 M M 0.76 3.36 M M M GRAND LAKE 6 SSW M M 1.11 0.53 1.03 0.27 1.50 0.56 1.06 M GRANT M M 0.94 0.60 M 0.08 M 0.76 0.60 M GREAT SAND DUNES M M 0.31 0.54 0.95 0.29 0.29 0.27 M M GREELEY UNC M M M 1.37 M 0.02 0.37 M 1.55 M GRIZZLY PEAK 37 80 2.50 0.70 2.90 2.20 4.70 2.10 2.80 1.10 GROSS RSVR M M M 1.96 M 0.00 1.60 M M M GUFFEY 9SE M M 1.99 1.20 0.50 1.35 1.35 0.77 0.67 M HAYDEN M M 1.90 1.37 2.60 2.53 2.40 1.67 1.75 M HERMIT 7 ESE M M 0.08 2.03 0.87 0.07 0.58 1.04 0.00 M HOOSIER PASS M M 2.70 2.20 3.30 1.50 4.10 2.70 2.90 M HOURGLASS RSVR M M M M M M 3.12 M M M HUGO 1 NW M M 0.27 M M M M M M M IDALIA M M 0.29 0.58 0.24 0.48 0.22 0.72 0.24 M INDEPENDENCE PASS 75 91 2.10 2.00 2.80 2.70 4.30 2.80 2.90 1.80 IVANHOE 78 91 2.70 2.30 3.20 3.20 5.00 3.10 3.50 2.30 JACKWHACKER GULCH 56 105 3.20 1.90 3.40 2.20 5.20 2.50 2.70 1.40 JOE WRIGHT 72 99 4.50 2.30 4.60 3.60 7.60 3.70 4.50 3.20 JOHN MARTIN DAM M M 0.30 0.22 0.19 0.38 0.38 0.00 0.20 M JONES PASS 66 91 3.30 1.30 3.40 2.80 4.90 2.80 3.90 1.80 JULESBURG M M 0.18 0.44 M 0.08 0.19 M 0.69 M KARVAL M M M M M 0.03 0.31 M 0.05 M KASSLER M M 2.02 1.38 0.66 0.10 1.81 2.23 0.85 M KILN 74 89 2.00 1.90 2.20 2.10 3.30 1.80 2.10 1.40 KIM 10SSE M M 0.89 0.39 0.39 0.48 0.48 0.10 0.67 M KIM 15 NNE M M 0.83 0.28 0.56 1.12 1.12 0.61 0.34 M KIT CARSON M M M 0.10 0.10 0.15 0.34 0.46 0.09 M KIT CARSON 9NNE M M 0.02 0.01 M M M M M M KREMMLING M M M 0.47 M 0.37 0.96 0.33 1.52 M LA JUNTA M M 1.27 0.61 0.32 1.11 1.11 0.23 0.24 M LA JUNTA 20 S M M 0.80 M 0.31 0.55 0.55 0.22 0.22 M LAKE ELDORA M M 3.60 2.00 2.70 1.30 5.20 3.10 4.50 M LAKE GEORGE 8 SW M M 0.77 0.76 0.36 0.05 0.70 0.53 1.05 M LAKE IRENE 67 101 3.80 1.90 3.40 3.60 5.70 2.90 4.10 2.30 LAKEWOOD M M 1.83 2.00 0.20 0.03 1.24 1.54 1.36 M LAMAR M M 0.26 0.19 0.34 0.51 0.51 0.34 0.22 M LAS ANIMAS M M 0.46 0.26 0.16 0.50 0.50 0.29 0.06 M LEMON DAM M M 0.62 3.18 3.18 1.23 0.84 2.60 0.13 M LEROY 9 WSW M M 0.51 0.48 0.33 0.06 0.19 0.77 0.66 M LIMON HASS RCH M M M M M 0.18 0.40 0.77 0.06 M LINDON 5 WNW M M 0.52 0.45 0.14 0.14 0.18 1.72 0.52 M LIZARD HEAD PASS 25 55 0.50 2.10 3.50 1.40 0.50 2.60 0.50 0.60 LONE CONE 23 61 0.70 2.50 3.40 1.90 1.00 4.00 1.10 0.50 LOST DOG M M 3.70 2.00 3.90 5.10 4.30 3.20 2.80 M LOVELAND 2N M M 1.26 2.17 0.28 0.00 1.13 1.69 2.02 M LOVELAND BASIN M M 3.40 1.70 2.90 2.40 4.50 2.50 2.70 M LYNX PASS 45 93 2.00 0.90 2.30 2.30 3.90 1.40 2.20 0.90 MANCOS M M 0.10 3.40 4.00 1.60 0.50 3.00 0.00 M MANCOS M M 0.06 1.82 2.10 0.64 0.38 1.82 0.04 M MARSTON FLTR PLT M M 1.78 1.58 0.26 0.08 1.59 1.93 M M MAYBELL M M 1.33 1.00 1.62 0.60 0.92 1.50 0.62 M MC CLURE PASS 41 78 2.10 1.80 3.60 3.60 3.10 3.60 1.40 1.00 MCCOY PARK M M 4.10 2.00 2.50 2.10 3.10 1.90 2.30 M MEDANO PASS 52 51 1.30 0.50 2.90 0.40 1.20 0.90 0.80 0.90 MESA LAKES 7 58 1.60 2.80 2.70 2.50 1.00 3.70 1.30 0.20 MESA VERDE NP M M 0.08 1.19 2.20 0.80 0.38 1.62 0.00 M MICHIGAN CREEK M M 2.70 2.40 2.70 1.90 4.50 1.70 2.40 M MIDDLE CREEK 14 60 1.00 4.80 4.60 0.80 1.60 4.10 0.10 0.30 MIDDLE FORK CAMP 78 97 3.00 1.30 1.90 1.90 3.70 1.40 3.40 1.60 MINERAL CREEK M M 0.90 2.90 4.20 1.70 1.60 3.50 1.20 M MOLAS LAKE M M 1.00 2.80 4.50 2.00 1.90 4.10 1.10 M MONTE VISTA 2W M M 0.09 0.34 0.54 0.13 0.13 0.26 0.07 M MONTROSE #2 M M 0.25 0.76 0.69 0.62 0.05 0.57 0.14 M NAST LAKE 76 73 1.70 1.30 1.70 1.30 2.30 0.80 1.30 1.20 NEW RAYMER M M 0.16 M 0.35 0.00 0.20 1.76 0.67 M NIWOT 71 100 3.00 1.60 2.10 1.10 4.20 3.70 4.60 2.40 NORTH LOST TRAIL 43 77 2.40 2.40 3.50 2.80 3.20 3.70 1.90 1.00 NORTHDALE M M 0.10 1.89 1.85 0.58 0.08 0.95 0.07 M NORTHGLENN M M 1.58 2.09 M 0.03 0.92 2.01 1.29 M NORWOOD M M 0.32 0.90 1.54 1.18 0.09 M M M ORDWAY 2 ENE M M 0.49 0.24 0.28 0.51 0.51 0.14 0.12 M OURWAY #2 33 70 1.03 2.15 1.84 1.76 0.75 1.48 1.29 0.57 OVERLAND RES.
Recommended publications
  • Wild & Scenic River
    APPENDIX 2-E WILD & SCENIC RIVER ELIGIBILITY EVALUATION BRIDGER-TETON NATIONAL FOREST Background Under the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968, Congress declared that there are certain rivers in the nation that possess outstandingly remarkable scenic, recreational, geologic, fish and wildlife, historic, and cultural values that should be preserved in a free-flowing condition. These rivers and their environments should be protected for the benefit and enjoyment of present and future generations. During forest plan revision, a comprehensive evaluation of the forest‘s rivers is required to identify those that have potential to be included in the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. Forest planning must address rivers that meet one of these criteria: Are wholly or partially on National Forest System lands Were identified by Congress for further study Are in the Nationwide Rivers Inventory (NRI) Have been identified as a potential Wild and Scenic River by inventory conducted by the agency. The BTNF identified 31 river segments as potential Wild and Scenic Rivers during an inventory in 1991-1992; a number of additional eligible segments have been identified since and they have been added to the total list of __ river segments and __ miles in each of the following categories. In order to be considered eligible rivers must be essentially free flowing and have one or more outstandingly remarkable values. Rivers identified as eligible will be managed to maintain eligibility until suitability is determined. Rivers determined to be eligible were given a tentative classification as wild, scenic, or recreational according to their proximity to development and level of access.
    [Show full text]
  • Gunnison National Forest Travel Management Record of Decision
    APPENDICES A-D Gunnison National Forest Travel Management Record of Decision June 2010 Gunnison National Forest Travel Management Appendices for ROD — 1 Record of Decision (ROD) Gunnison National Forest Travel Management DECISION TABLE KEY FOR APPENDICES A-D Decision Code Description F Trail open to and designed for Foot travel l HO Trail designed for Pack and Saddle (P&S) use, allowed use is Foot and P&S U Unmanaged Foot/P&S trail, not a part of the maintained or signed trail system NM/MB Trail open to non-motorized uses, where trail is built to mountain bike trail design standards NM/HO Trail open to non-motorized uses, where trail is built to pack and saddle design standards MO Trail open to and designed for Single Track motorized travel ATV Trail open to and designed for motorized vehicles less than 50 inches in width JEEP OHV Trail - opened to all motorized vehicles, managed as a trail HC High clearance road (Level 2) open to motorized use; non licensed vehicles allowed PSG3 High clearance road (Level 2) open to motorized use; non licensed vehicles allowed PSG3_NNL High clearance road (Level 2) open to motorized use; non licensed vehicles allowed PSG4 Passenger vehicle road (Level 4) licensed and non-licensed vehicles allowed PSG5 Passenger vehicle road (Level 5) licensed vehicles only D Route is identified to be closed DE Route is currently decommissioned and will remain closed A Administrative road, motorized travel is allowed by permit A-TRAIL Non motorized trail allowing administrative use by motorized vehicles less than 50 in.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 / 2020 Annual Report ABOUT US the CBAC Is a 501C3 Non-Profit Avalanche Center
    2019 / 2020 annual report ABOUT US The CBAC is a 501c3 non-profit avalanche center Staff The unique and diverse snow climate, acres of pristine wilderness of the Elk Mountains and the remoteness of Crested Butte, Colorado, has presented challenges and limitations for Than Acuff statewide forecasting operations. The result is a need for accurate snow and avalanche information in the Gunnison Valley. From this need the Crested Butte Avalanche Center Executive Director (CBAC) was born in 2002. Unlike other government funded centers, the CBAC was Karen Williams started by volunteer forecasters issuing daily forecasts from a basement work station. Development Director Each year the CBAC strives to make huge improvements to meet the demands of our growing backcountry community. Forecasters our major goals each year are: Evan Ross Eric Morrow To provide the most accurate avalanche and weather information to Ian Havlick help all winter outdoor recreational users make the most informed Zach Kinler decisions when traveling in the winter backcountry environment. To secure enough funding to competitively pay and retain professional Board of Directors forecasters and staff, year after year. Keitha Kostyk To raise general public awareness about the Crested Butte Avalanche Center, President avalanches and safe backcountry travel through various community outreach events held throughout the winter. Steve Banks Chad Berardo Ben Breslauer Jim Duffy 5 ways for the general public to get the most John Dugenske accurate weather and avalanche info... Chris Read Seth Tucker Online at cbavalanchecenter.org Give us your email and we’ll send it to you every day! Tune into KBUT or KAYV daily at 8:00am and listen.
    [Show full text]
  • Ski Development in National Forests Harris D
    University of Colorado Law School Colorado Law Scholarly Commons The ubP lic Lands During the Remainder of the 20th Getches-Wilkinson Center Conferences, Century: Planning, Law, and Policy in the Federal Workshops, and Hot Topics Land Agencies (Summer Conference, June 8-10) 6-10-1987 Ski Development in National Forests Harris D. Sherman David S. Neslin Ian K. Whitlock Follow this and additional works at: http://scholar.law.colorado.edu/public-lands-during- remainder-planning-law-and-policy-in-federal-land-agencies Part of the Administrative Law Commons, Animal Law Commons, Animal Studies Commons, Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, Courts Commons, Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons, Energy Law Commons, Energy Policy Commons, Environmental Law Commons, Environmental Policy Commons, Forest Management Commons, Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons, Judges Commons, Jurisdiction Commons, Land Use Planning Commons, Legislation Commons, Litigation Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Natural Resources Law Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Oil, Gas, and Energy Commons, Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law Commons, Peace and Conflict Studies Commons, Politics Commons, Property Law and Real Estate Commons, Recreation, Parks and Tourism Administration Commons, Soil Science Commons, State and Local Government Law Commons, Water Law Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Citation Information Sherman, Harris D.; Neslin, David S.; and Whitlock, Ian K., "Ski Development in National Forests" (1987). The Public Lands During the Remainder of the 20th Century: Planning, Law, and Policy in the Federal Land Agencies (Summer Conference, June 8-10). http://scholar.law.colorado.edu/public-lands-during-remainder-planning-law-and-policy-in-federal-land-agencies/16 Reproduced with permission of the Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Resources, Energy, and the Environment (formerly the Natural Resources Law Center) at the University of Colorado Law School.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests DRAFT Wilderness Evaluation Report August 2018
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests DRAFT Wilderness Evaluation Report August 2018 Designated in the original Wilderness Act of 1964, the Maroon Bells-Snowmass Wilderness covers more than 183,000 acres spanning the Gunnison and White River National Forests. In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form.
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)
    Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Summits on the Air USA - Colorado (WØC) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S46.1 Issue number 3.2 Date of issue 15-June-2021 Participation start date 01-May-2010 Authorised Date: 15-June-2021 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Matt Schnizer KØMOS Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 11 Document S46.1 V3.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Change Control Date Version Details 01-May-10 1.0 First formal issue of this document 01-Aug-11 2.0 Updated Version including all qualified CO Peaks, North Dakota, and South Dakota Peaks 01-Dec-11 2.1 Corrections to document for consistency between sections. 31-Mar-14 2.2 Convert WØ to WØC for Colorado only Association. Remove South Dakota and North Dakota Regions. Minor grammatical changes. Clarification of SOTA Rule 3.7.3 “Final Access”. Matt Schnizer K0MOS becomes the new W0C Association Manager. 04/30/16 2.3 Updated Disclaimer Updated 2.0 Program Derivation: Changed prominence from 500 ft to 150m (492 ft) Updated 3.0 General information: Added valid FCC license Corrected conversion factor (ft to m) and recalculated all summits 1-Apr-2017 3.0 Acquired new Summit List from ListsofJohn.com: 64 new summits (37 for P500 ft to P150 m change and 27 new) and 3 deletes due to prom corrections.
    [Show full text]
  • An Archaeological Inventory in the Pike's Stockade Area, Conejos
    An Archaeological Inventory in the Pike’s Stockade Area, Conejos County, Colorado by Kevin D. Black Principal Investigator Colorado Historical Society with a contribution by Bruce Wahle Denver Chapter Colorado Archaeological Society Sponsored by Colorado Historical Society Office of the State Archaeologist of Colorado Program for Avocational Archaeological Certification Denver, Colorado Colorado State Permits #2004–21, 2005–6, 2006–41 October 2007 Abstract During the 2004–2006 field seasons, an archaeological survey was conducted east of Sanford, Colorado as part of the training available in the Program for Avocational Archaeological Certification (PAAC). The project thus used volunteers largely from the Colorado Archaeological Society (CAS) already enrolled in PAAC, supervised and trained by the Assistant State Archaeologist from the Colorado Historical Society. The inventory was completed on about 907 acres of the Pike’s Stockade State Historic Monument (PSSHM) in Conejos County, Colorado. The study tract encompassed a low shrubland environment on and around a volcanic mesa named Sierro del Ojito, bordering the wooded floodplain of the Conejos River, at elevations of 2,296–2,495 m. This area was intensively surveyed primarily to train PAAC volunteers in archaeological inventory and mapping methods. In addition, this portion of southern Colorado had been the subject of relatively little archaeological research interest, and the PSSHM—as a regional property of the Colorado Historical Society—made a logical choice for a PAAC survey project. As a result of the survey a total of 37 sites and 26 isolated finds (IFs) were recorded, including both American Indian and non-Indian materials. Historic period non-Indian sites comprise a rather diverse mix of artifact scatters, cairns, fences, stone enclosures, and rock inscriptions related primarily to ranching and recreational activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Bighorn Sheep Disease Risk Assessment
    Risk Analysis of Disease Transmission between Domestic Sheep and Goats and Rocky Mountain Bighorn Sheep Prepared by: ______________________________ Cory Mlodik, Wildlife Biologist for: Shoshone National Forest Rocky Mountain Region C. Mlodik, Shoshone National Forest April 2012 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Bighorn Sheep Disease Risk Assessment Contents Background ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Bighorn Sheep Distribution and Abundance......................................................................................... 1 Literature
    [Show full text]
  • Yellowstone Center for Resources
    YELLOWSTONE CENTER FOR RESOURCES SPATIAL A naly sis es rc u o s RESOUR e CE R N L A T A U R R U A T L L U R e C s o u r r c c e s I nfo rmation R ES EA RCH Support ANNUAL2001 REPORT YELLOWSTONE CENTER FOR RESOURCES 2001 ANNUAL REPORT Hand-painted Limoges bowl, Lower Falls of the Yellowstone, ca. 1910. Part of the Davis Collection acquired in 2001. Yellowstone Center for Resources National Park Service Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming YCR–AR–2001 2002 In memory of Donay Hanson 1960–2001 Suggested Citation: Yellowstone Center for Resources. 2002. Yellowstone Center for Resources Annual Report, 2001. National Park Service, Mammoth Hot Springs, Wyoming, YCR–AR–2001. Photographs not otherwise marked are courtesy of the National Park Service. Front cover: clockwise from top right, Beatrice Miles of the Nez Perce Tribe; Yellowstone cutthroat trout; Golden Gate Bridge by W. Ingersoll, circa 1880s, from the Susan and Jack Davis Collection; low northern sedge (Carex concinna) by Jennifer Whipple; and center, Canada lynx. Back cover: mountain chickadee. ii Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................ iv Part I. Resource Highlights ............................................................................... 1 Part II. Cultural Resource Programs ............................................................... 7 Archeology ...................................................................................................... 8 Ethnography .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • RI 2019 Welcome Faqs.Pdf
    Yellowstone National Park, the world’s first national park, is named after the Yellowstone River. Welcome Yellowstone National Park is as wondrous as it is complex. The park has rich human and ecological stories that continue to unfold. When Yellowstone was established as the world’s first national park in , it sparked an idea that influenced the creation of the National Park Service and the more than ­ sites it protects today across the United States. Yellowstone National Park also forms the core of the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. At ­, square miles, it is one of the largest, nearly intact temper- ate-zone ecosystems on Earth. The park continues to influence preservation and science, and we are pleased to share its stories with you. Many people have dedicated their lives and careers to • The park newspaper distributed at entrance studying Yellowstone and the park has a long history gates and visitor centers. of research and public interest. The park hosts more • Site bulletins, published as needed, provide than 150 researchers from various agencies, univer- more detailed information on park topics such sities, and organizations each year. They produce as trailside museums and the grand hotels. Free; hundreds of papers, manuscripts, books, and book available upon request from visitor centers. chapters on their work annually—a volume of infor- • Trail guides, available at all visitor centers. mation that is difficult to absorb. This compendium A $1 donation is requested. is intended to help you understand the important concepts about Yellowstone’s many resources and Second Century of Service contains information about the park’s history, natural On August 25, 2016, the National Park Service and cultural resources, and issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Weather and Climate Inventory National Park Service Greater Yellowstone Network
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado Weather and Climate Inventory National Park Service Greater Yellowstone Network Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/GRYN/NRTR—2006/001 ON THE COVER Mt. Moran—Grand Teton National Park Photograph copyrighted by David Simeral Weather and Climate Inventory National Park Service Greater Yellowstone Network Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/GRYN/NRTR—2006/001 WRCC Report 06-02 Christopher A. Davey, Kelly T. Redmond, and David B. Simeral Western Regional Climate Center Desert Research Institute 2215 Raggio Parkway Reno, Nevada 89512-1095 July 2006 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientific community, the public, and the National Park Service conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. The Natural Resource Technical Reports series is used to disseminate the peer-reviewed results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service’s mission. The reports provide contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. Current examples of such reports include the results of research that addresses natural resource management issues; natural resource inventory and monitoring activities; resource assessment reports; scientific literature reviews; and peer reviewed proceedings of technical workshops, conferences, or symposia.
    [Show full text]
  • Numerical Simulations of Snowpack Augmentation for Drought Mitigation Studies in the Colorado Rocky Mountains
    Numerical Simulations of Snowpack Augmentation for Drought Mitigation Studies in the Colorado Rocky Mountains Final Report Submitted to U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Weather Damage Modification Program Denver Federal Center Denver, Colorado 80225 In Fulfillment of Financial Assistance Agreement No. 03-FC-81-0925 September 2005 Department of Natural Resources Colorado Water Conservation Board Flood Protection & Weather Modification Permitting Denver, Colorado 80203 Numerical Simulations of Snowpack Augmentation for Drought Mitigation Studies in the Colorado Rocky Mountains Final Report By Curt Hartzell, William Cotton, Ray McAnelly, Gustavo Carrió, Paul Mielke, Joe Busto, Steve Schmitzer, Larry Hjermstad, and Ross Williams Project Team for Research Project Colorado Water Conservation Board (CWCB) Flood Protection & Weather Modification Permitting Section Joe Busto, Project Manager Denver Water (DW) Operational Cloud Seeding Program Steve Schmitzer Becky Dechant, Greg Bryant Project Consultant to CWCB & DW Curt Hartzell, CCM Consultant to CWCB for GIS Support Ross Williams Cloud Seeding Operations for DW Western Weather Consultants, LLC Larry Hjermstad Colorado State University Research Team Dr. Bill Cotton, PI Ray McAnelly, Gustavo Carrió, Paul Mielke, Brenda Thompson September 2005 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Tables iv List of Figures v List of Appendixes ix Acknowledgements x Colorado Weather Modification Grant Program xii Executive Summary xv Glossary and Acronyms xix 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Weather Damage Modification Program 1 1.2 Project Administration and Management 1 1.3 Current Status of Winter Orographic Cloud Seeding 2 1.4 Colorado Weather Modification Permit Program 4 1.5 Denver Water Operational Cloud Seeding Program 6 1.6 Colorado State University Regional Atmospheric Modeling System 6 2.
    [Show full text]