DOCSLIB.ORG

Coleoptera, Cetoniidae, Cetoniinae

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Coleoptera, Cetoniidae, Cetoniinae INSTllUTFRANCAIS DE RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE POUR LE DEVELOPPEtvENTEN COOPERATION CENTRE D'ADIOPODOUME BP V51 ABIDJAN COTE D'IVOIRE COLLECTION ENTOMOLOGIQUE ©~iJ@OOO~® [Ç)~ ©@iJ~ [Ç)~OW@Ornl~ «OO[6rg@[P'1J'rgrro~il ©rgy@OOOO@~rgil ©rgroOOOOOO~rg) G. FEDIERE. X. LERY Septembre 1988 CETOINES DE COTE D'IVOIRE (Coleopters Cetonlidae Ceton/lnae ) G. FEDIERE, X. LERY Centre ORSTOM Adiopodoumé BP. V-51 ABIDJAN (Côte d'Ivoire) Ce catalogue des Cetoniinae de COte d'Ivoire représente la liste des espèces réunies dans la Collection Entomologique ORSTOM qui se réparti entre le Centre d'Adiopodoumé et l'Antenne du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle de Paris. Il n'a donc pas la prétention d'être exhaustif. Nous présentons 104 espèces réparties selon la classification de Krikken (1984). Huit espèces de la tribu des Cremastocheilini sont en cours de détermination au Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle de Paris. Une prochaine étude abordera les Trichinae et les Valginae. Nous adressons nos vifs remerciements à Mme A. MONSARRAT et M. P. DECHAMBRE du M.N.H.N. ainsi qu'à M. P. ANTOINE et J. RIGOUT pour l'aide efficace qu'ils nous ont apporté. 2 FAMILLE: CETONIIDAE SOUS-FAMILLE: CETONIINAE TRIBU: GOLIATHINI SOUS-TRIBU : GOLIATHINA Genre: Goliathus Lamarck, 1801 1. G. cacicus Voet, 1779 Abobo-gare, V.1972, VII. 1979, VII 1981 Banco, VII. 1979, Akoupé, VI1.1983. 2. G. regius Klug, 1835 Issia, III. 1979, III. 1980, Tiassalé, VII1.1983. Genre: Fornasinius Bertoloni,1853 3. F. HigginsiWesMood, 1874 Adiopodoumé, V1.1979, X11.1986, Tiassalé, V.1984. SOUS-TRIBU: CORYPHOCERINA (MECYNORHININA, STEPHANORRHININA, GNATHOCERINA, TMESORRHININA) Genre: Mecynorhina Hope, 1837 4. M. torquata Drury,1782 Tai, V.1979. Buyo, VII.1979, VI.1980 Genre: Chelorrhina Burmeister, 1842 5. C. polyphemus Fabricius, 1781 Tiassalé, X1.1979. V1I1.1983, Issia, X1.1984. 6. C. savagei Harris, 1844 Tiassalé, X1.1979. Issia, 1.1978 Genre: Megalorhina WesMood, 1847 7. M. harrisiWesMood, 1847 Banco, X.1976. Tai, 11.1978 3 Genre: Eudicella White, 1839 8. E. frontalis Westwood, 1841 Banco, X.1976. Tiassalé, X1.1979. Issia, X1.1984. Azagny, X.1986. 9. E. gralli Buquet, 1836 Banco, X.1976. Issia, V11.1984. Tafiré, IX.1988. 10. E. morgani White, 1839 Banco, X.1976. X1.1979. Genre: Dicronorhina (Dicranorrhina) Hope, 1837 11. D. cavifrons Westwood, 1841 Banco, X.1972. X1.1975. Tiassalé, III. 1980. Akoupé, 1. 1980. Taï, VI. 1979. Genre: Cyprolais Thomson, 1880 (Coelorrhina Burmeister, 1842) 12. C. aurata Westwood, 1841 Gagnoa, X1.1972. Grand Béréby, IX.1985. Azagny, X.1986. 13. C. pythia Kolbe, 1899 Tiassalé, X1.1979. Divo, V.1980. Genre: Lophorrhina Westwood, 1842 (Chordodera Burmeister, 1842) 14. L. pentachordia Klug, 1835 Grand Béréby, IX.1985. Azagny, 111.1985. X.1985. Boore, X1.1986. Tafiré, IX.1988. 15. L. quinquelineata Fabricius, 1781 Banco, 1.1975. Samakro, XI1.1974 Grand Béréby, IX. 1985. Azagny, 111.1985. 4 Genre: Asthenorhina Westwood, 1843 16. A. turneri Westwood, 1843 Tiassalé, X1.1979. Genre: Stephanorrhina Burmeister, 1842 17. S. guttata Olivier, 1789 Abidjan, X1.1974. X1.1975. Sassandra, XI1.1977 Tiassalé, X1.1979. Grand Béréby, IX.1985. Taï, X11.1985. X11.1986. Genre: Aphelorhina Westwood, 1841 18. A. simil/ima Westwood, 1841 Bouaké, X1.1977, Boora, X1.1986. Genre : Plaesiorrhinella Krikken, 1984 (Plaesiorrhina Burmeister, 1842) 19. P. recurva Fabricius, 1801 Abidjan, X.1974. IV.1975. Tiassalé, 11.1980. Soubré, IV.1985. V.1986. Toupé, V1.1988. Genre : Pedinorrhina Kraatz, 1880 20. P. mediana Westwood,1841 Abidjan, X.1976. 1.1975. IV.1986. Azagny, 1.1987. 21. P. swanziana Schaum, (Smaragdesthes hypoxantha Harold, 1879) Bouaké, 111.1974. Abidjan, X.1975. San Pédro, XI1.1979 Genre: Chlorocala Kirby, 1828 (Smaragdesthes Kraatz ,1880) 22. C. affinis Kraatz, 1880 Grand Bassam, X11.1974. Abidjan, IV.1975. San Pédro, XII. 1979, Azagny, X.1986., 5 23. C. africana Drury, 1773 Abidjan, V1.1976. Soubré, IV.1985. Booro, X1.1986. Tiassalé, X11.1985. A~agny, 111.1985. Toupé, V1.1988. 24. C. guerini Janson, 1888 Bouaflé, 11.1978. Toupé, V1.1988. 25. C. similis Moser, 1907 Azagny, X.1986. 26. C. suturalis Fabricius, 1775 Abidjan, XI.1976, X.1979, Azagny, X.1985 San Pédro, XI1.1979, Soubré, 111.1985. Genre: Chondrorrhina Kraatz, 1880 27. C. abbreviata Fabricius, 1792 Agboville, VI.1975, Bouaflé, 11.1978. Divo, 111.1986, Toupé, V1.1988. Genre: Gnathocera Kirby, 1825 28. C. ango/ensis Westwood, 1854 Toumodi, X.1970. 29. G. bilineata Kraatz, 1886 Lamto, X.1975, Korhogo, X1.1977. 30. G. f1avovirens Kolbe, 1892 Katiola, X1.1978. Booro, X1.1986. 31. G. impressa Olivier, 1789 Korhogo, X1.1977. Booro, X1.1986. 32. G. trivinata Swederus, 1787 Toumodi, IX.1969, Bouaké, IX.1970. Booro, X1.1986. 6 Genre: Tmesorrhina Westwood, 1842 33. T. iris Fabricius, 1781 Banco, X.1974. Taï, X11.1986. Abidjan, V.1975. Divo, IV.1987. Grand Béréby, IX.1985. Azagny, X11.1987. 34. T. tridens Duvivier, 1891 Banco, X.1974. Abidjan, X1.1974. Azagny, 111.1985. Booro,XI.1986. Taï, X11.1985. Toupé, V1.1988. Genre : Caelorrhina Hope, 1841 (Eccoptocnemis Kraatz, 1880) 35. C. thoreyi Schaum, 1841 Abidjan, X.1975. Soubré, IV.1985. Divo, 111.1986. Boora, X1.1986. Toupé, V1.1988. Azagny, X11.1987. Tai, XI1.1986 TRIBU: GYMNETINI SOUS-TRIBU: GYMNETINA (MACRONOTINA) Genre : Stethodesma Bainbrige, 1840 36. S. strachani Bainbridge, 1840 Abidjan, 111.1972. X1.1976. V.1977. Boora, X1.1986. Soubré, IV.1985. Grand-Béréby, IX.1985. Divo,IV.1987. TRIBU : CETONIINI SOUS-TRIBU: CETONIINA (ELAPHININA) Genre : Pachnoda Burmeister, 1842 37. P. ardoini Ruter, 1978 Toupé, VI.1988. 7 38. P. conca/or Schürhoff, Divo, 111.1980. Boore, X1.1986. Toupé, V1.1988. Tafiré,IX.1988. 39. P. cordata Drury, 1773 Korhogo, XI.1977, Soubré, IV.1985. Divo, 111.1986. Boore, X1.1986. Toupé, V1.1988. Tafiré, IX.1988. 40. P. fedierei Rigout, 1988 Béoumi, 1975. 41. P. hi/aris Westwood,1874 Banco, IV.1978.IX.1979. Soubré, IV.1985. Tiassalé,IV.1987. 42. P. interrupta Olivier, 1789 Korhogo, X1.1977. 43. P. marginata Drury, 1n3 Adiopodoumé, 111.1986. Divo, 1II.1986.Soubré, IV.1985. Grand-Béréby, IX.1985.Tai, X11.1985. Azagny, X11.1987. 44. P. marginella Fabricius, 1n5 Grand Bassam, X11.1974. Grand-Béréby, IX.1985 Soubré, IV.1985. San Pédro, X11.1979. Tiassalé, IV.1987. 45. P. nachtiga/i Kraatz, 1885 Korhogo, X1.1977. 46. P. nigritarsis Harold, 1880 Banco, X1.1977. Adiopodoumé, XI.1983 47. P. orphanu/a Voet, 1779 Azagny, 111.1985. Divo, 111.1986. 48. P. postica Gory et Percheron, 1833 Banco, IV.1975, X.1977. Azagny, V.1985, 1.1987 Adiopodoumé, V11.1983. 8 49. P. rubrocincta Hope, 1847 Banco, IV.1975, VI.1975 50. P. tridentata Olivier, 1789 Banco, X11.1976, X.1977. Azagny, 111.1985, Soubré, IV.1985. Tiassalé, IV.1987, Boore, X1.1986. Toupé, V1.1988, Divo, IV.1987. 51. P. viridana Blanchard, 1850 Abidjan. X.1977, Soubré, X.1979, V.1986 Gagnoa, X.1973, Azagny, 111.1985. 52. P. bax Gory et Percheron, 1833 Tafiré,IX.1988. 53. P. sp. Toupé, V1.1988. Tafiré, IX.1988. Genre : Psadacoptera Kraatz, 1882 54. P. arborescens Vigors, 1826 Bouaké, X.1976, Boundiali, 1978. Genre: Rhabdotis Burmeister, 1842 55. R. sobrina Gory & Percheron, 1833 Korhogo, X1.1977. Tafiré, IX.1988. Genre: Atrichelaphinis Kraatz, 1898 56. A. glycyphanoïdes Moser, 1908 Divo, 111.1986. Adiopodoumé, 111.1986. Genre : Niphobleta Kraatz 1880 57. N. kraatzi Kolbe, 1897 Lamto, 111.1977, Abidjan, X.1975. Taï, 11.1985. Azagny, 1.1987. Adiopodoumé, Il.1978. 9 58. N. niveosparsa Kraat, 1880 Abidjan, X.1974, X.1975. Lamto, X.1975, Divo, 111.1986 Banco, IV.1975, Tabou, X.1979. Azagny, 1.1987. Taï, 11.1985. Toupé, V1.1988. Genre: Phaneresthes Kraatz, 1894 59. P. Flavovariegata Kraatz, 1894 Tai, 11.1978 . 1ci' Cette espèce a été décrite par Kraatz à partir d'un specimen femelle. Il s'agit du premier type mâle à partir duquel Antoine va redécrire le genre et l'espèce puisqu'il s'agit de l'espèce type du genre. Genre: Pseudoprotaetia Kraatz,1882 60. P. stolara Olivier, 1798 Bouaké, X.1980. Genre : Polybaphes Kirby, 1827 (Phonotaenia Kraatz, 1880, Gametis Burmeister, 1842) ?i 61. P. aequinoctialis Olivier, 1789~i) . Bouaké, IV.1977.. Bouaflé, Il.197. Booro, X1.1986. Khorogo, XI.197~~toupé, V1.1988. 62. P. nigricepsWestwood, 1874 63. P. seslaris Gory & Percheron, 1833 Bouaké, V1.1977. Lamto, X.1964. Gagnoa, X.1972. Tabou, X.1979. Divo, V.1987. Banco, 11.1979. Abidjan, 11.1975. 64. P. sanguinolenta Olivier, 1789 Soubré, V.1980. Divo, 111.198\ Bouaflé, Il.1978. Lamto, V.1975. Banco, X.1977. Tai, VIII.1979, X.1986. Toupé, V1.1988. 10 Genre : Cosmiophaena Kraatz, 1898 65. C. impar Gary & Percheron, 1833 Abidjan, X.1975. Tortiya, VI1.1978. Grand-Béréby, IX. 1985, Banco, X1.1979. Sassandra, X11.1977. 66. C. minor Kraatz, 1883 Lamto, XI. 1977. Genre: Tephraea Burmeister, 1842 67. T. pulverulenta Gary & Percheron, 1833 Taupé, V1.1988. Genre : Polystalactica Kraatz, 1882. 68. P. stel/ata Harold, 1878 Grand-Béréby, IX.1985. Azagny, X.1986 Abidjan, X. 1975.111.1978. Divo, XII.1985 Booro, X1.1987. Taupé, VI.1988. Soubré, V.1986. Genre: Cosmesthes Kraatz, 1880. 69. C. Iineatocol/is Kraatz, 1880 Banco, X1.1977. Taï, Il.1978. XII.1986. SOUS-TRIBU: LEUCOCELINA Genre: AI/eucosma Schenkling, 1921 70. A. viridula Kraatz, 1880 Tabou, 1.1982. Taï, 111.1978. Soubré, IV.1985, V.1986. Adiopodoumé, Il.1986. Azagny, 111.1985, X1.1987. Grand-Béréby, IX.1985. Divo, 111.1986. Tafiré, IX.1988. 71. A. maritima Moser, 1914 Bouaké, VII.1979. Azagny, XI.1987, 111.1983. Taupé, V1.1988, Booro, X1.1986. Adiopodoumé, 11.1978. Soubré,IV.1985. 1 1 72. A. pauliani Antoine, 1988 Divo, 111.1986. Genre: Achromisetes Kraatz, 1880. 73. A. simonis Kraatz, 1880 Grand-Béréby, IX.1985. Genre: Discopeltis Burmeister, 1842.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Coleoptera: Cetoniidae) and Their Damages on Peach Fruits in Orchards of Northern Dalmatia, Croatia
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Entomol. Croat. 2009, Vol. 13. Num. 2: 7-20 ISSN 1330-6200 IzvORNI zNANSTvENI čLANCI ORIGINAL SCIENTIfIC PAPER Fauna Of THE Cetoniid BEETLES (Coleoptera: Cetoniidae) AND THEIR DAMAGES ON PEACH fRUITS IN ORCHARDS Of NorthERN Dalmatia, Croatia Josip RAžOV¹, Božena BARIĆ² & Moreno DUTTO³ ¹ University of Zadar, Department of Mediterranean Agriculture and Aquaculture, Mihovila Pavlinovica bb, 23000 Zadar, Croatia; e-mail: [email protected] ² Faculty of Agronomy, University of Zagreb, Svetošimunska 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia; e-mail: [email protected] ³ Sezione Entomologia Museo Civico Storia Naturale, Carmagnola, Italy; e-mail: [email protected] Accepted: June 29th 2009 The beetles Cetonia aurata and Potosia cuprea belonging to the subfamily Cetoniinae (Coleoptera: Cetoniidae) are present in peach orchards in Northern Dalmatia, Ravni kotari region. They are often described as flower pest (“Rose chafers, flower beetles”), and are thought not to be significant as fruit pests. However, during the last ten years some serious damage to fruit has been observed. Since this damage occurs when the fruits are ripening, insecticides cannot be used. There are no literature data about the amount of the damage or how to monitor the damage. This paper describes our monitoring of the population dynamics of the Cetonia aurata and Potosia cuprea, and the method for calculating the damage to fruit suitable for the orchards in this area. The study was conducted during the spring and summer of the year 2005, 2006 and 2007 in the Ravni kotari region, near the villages of Prkos and Smilčić. We used Csalomon® VARb3k funnel traps.
    [Show full text]
  • A Trait-Based Approach Laura Roquer Beni Phd Thesis 2020
    ADVERTIMENT. Lʼaccés als continguts dʼaquesta tesi queda condicionat a lʼacceptació de les condicions dʼús establertes per la següent llicència Creative Commons: http://cat.creativecommons.org/?page_id=184 ADVERTENCIA. El acceso a los contenidos de esta tesis queda condicionado a la aceptación de las condiciones de uso establecidas por la siguiente licencia Creative Commons: http://es.creativecommons.org/blog/licencias/ WARNING. The access to the contents of this doctoral thesis it is limited to the acceptance of the use conditions set by the following Creative Commons license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/?lang=en Pollinator communities and pollination services in apple orchards: a trait-based approach Laura Roquer Beni PhD Thesis 2020 Pollinator communities and pollination services in apple orchards: a trait-based approach Tesi doctoral Laura Roquer Beni per optar al grau de doctora Directors: Dr. Jordi Bosch i Dr. Anselm Rodrigo Programa de Doctorat en Ecologia Terrestre Centre de Recerca Ecològica i Aplicacions Forestals (CREAF) Universitat de Autònoma de Barcelona Juliol 2020 Il·lustració de la portada: Gala Pont @gala_pont Al meu pare, a la meva mare, a la meva germana i al meu germà Acknowledgements Se’m fa impossible resumir tot el que han significat per mi aquests anys de doctorat. Les qui em coneixeu més sabeu que han sigut anys de transformació, de reptes, d’aprendre a prioritzar sense deixar de cuidar allò que és important. Han sigut anys d’equilibris no sempre fàcils però molt gratificants. Heu sigut moltes les persones que m’heu acompanyat, d’una manera o altra, en el transcurs d’aquest projecte de creixement vital i acadèmic, i totes i cadascuna de vosaltres, formeu part del resultat final.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Benefits Flower Beetles in a Mediterranean Ecosystem
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Fire benefits flower beetles in a Mediterranean ecosystem Juli G. Pausas1*, Josabel Belliure2, Eduardo MõÂnguez3, Sergio Montagud4 1 Centro de Investigaciones sobre DesertificacioÂn (CIDE-CSIC), Montcada, Valencia, Spain, 2 Departamento de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad de AlcalaÂ, AlcalaÂde Henares, Madrid, Spain, 3 Ciudadanos por la Ciencia, L'Alfàs del Pi, Alacant, Spain, 4 Institut Cavanilles de Biodiversitat i Biologia Evolutiva, Universitat de València, Paterna, Valencia, Spain * [email protected] a1111111111 a1111111111 a1111111111 Abstract a1111111111 a1111111111 Despite the abundance of plants that benefit from fire in Mediterranean ecosystems, little is known about the possible presence of fire-favoured insects (other than bark beetles). For two years we sampled invertebrates after two large wildfires in eastern Spain and demonstrate that two flower beetle species, Protaetia morio and P. oblonga (Cetoniidae), show a pyrophi- lous behaviour. These beetles were much more numerous after the fires than in unburnt plots OPEN ACCESS around the fire perimeter; in addition, these species tended to increase in number with the Citation: Pausas JG, Belliure J, MõÂnguez E, distance from the fire perimeter and with fire recurrence, especially P. morio. These results Montagud S (2018) Fire benefits flower beetles in a Mediterranean ecosystem. PLoS ONE 13(6): were maintained for the two postfire years sampled. The results for the beetles do not support e0198951. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. the hypothesis of postfire colonization, but that local populations survived the fire as eggs or pone.0198951 larvae protected in the soil (endogenous persistence). We propose that the increase in popu- Editor: Christopher Carcaillet, Ecole Pratique des lation size (compared with unburnt zones) could be driven by the reduction of their predator Hautes Etudes, FRANCE populations, as vertebrates that feed on these beetles were disfavoured by fire.
    [Show full text]
  • Northamptonshire Biodiversity Records Centre NBRC Newsletter 20
    Northamptonshire Biodiversity Records Centre The home of quality ecological data in Northamptonshire NBRC Newsletter 20 Autumn/Winter 2020 You have been keeping us wonderfully busy with your submitted records of the species of Northamptonshire; the WILDside Recording Community has been a great home for sightings and support. You have not been stopped in noticing and supporting our local nature - recording in gardens, out on local exercise walks and further afield when restrictions allow. Our website has received over one thousand records, covering over five hundred taxa since the first lockdown began! Many of you will have noticed our website has had a re-vamp of late, shifting Beyond direct website submission, we know you also to the latest platform with SSL security, whilst submit directly to our county recorders (David James retaining all the recording features, ‘look out for’ recently reported over 25,000 butterfly records for surveys and resources to support local recording and 2020!) and via other online channels such as iRecord. ecological reporting. If you aren’t sure of which surveys we receive you can always check our annual report which lists our partners or ask the team [email protected]. Direct record submissions to our website or via our county recorders (as listed on our new resources for recorders page on the website) are generally processed more swiftly as we get all the needed parts and can contact you if required to complete a record. WILDside seems to have inspired us all to expand our recording repertoire. The ever-increasing taxonomic coverage in your submissions is fantastic to see! It seems many have used the wealth of virtual training at our fingertips this year through Wildlife Trust BCN Training Courses, the Field Studies Council and a host of others as can be seen through this wonderfully Thanks to the support of the Environment Agency, we compiled list of resources as put together by the have now launched our latest survey ‘Look out for South East Wales Biodiversity Records Centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Automated Taxonomic Identification of Insects with Expert-Level
    Copyedited by: YS MANUSCRIPT CATEGORY: Systematic Biology Syst. Biol. 68(6):876–895, 2019 © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Systematic Biologists. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. DOI:10.1093/sysbio/syz014 Advance Access publication March 2, 2019 Automated Taxonomic Identification of Insects with Expert-Level Accuracy Using Effective Feature Transfer from Convolutional Networks , , ,∗ , , MIROSLAV VALAN1 2 3 ,KAROLY MAKONYI1 4,ATSUTO MAKI5,DOMINIK VONDRÁCEKˇ 6 7, AND FREDRIK RONQUIST2 1Savantic AB, Rosenlundsgatan 52, 118 63 Stockholm, Sweden; 2Department of Bioinformatics and Genetics, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Frescativagen 40, 114 18 Stockholm, Sweden; 3Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, Universitetsvagen 10, 114 18 Stockholm, Sweden; 4Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Physics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Nuclear Physics, Uppsala University, 751 20 Uppsala, Sweden; 5School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, SE-10044 Sweden; 6Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Viniˇcná 7, CZ-128 43 Praha 2, Czech Republic; 7Department of Entomology, National Museum, Cirkusová 1740, CZ-193 00 Praha 9 - Horní Poˇcernice, Czech
    [Show full text]
  • Development of an Attractant-Baited Trap for Oxythyrea Funesta Poda (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae, Cetoniinae) Jo´ Zsef Vuts*, Zolta´N Imrei, and Miklo´ Sto´ Th
    Development of an Attractant-Baited Trap for Oxythyrea funesta Poda (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae, Cetoniinae) Jo´ zsef Vuts*, Zolta´n Imrei, and Miklo´ sTo´ th Plant Protection Institute, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Herman O. u. 15., H-1022 Budapest, Hungary. Fax: +36-1-3 91-86 55. E-mail: [email protected] * Author for correspondence and reprint requests Z. Naturforsch. 63 c, 761Ð768 (2008); received February 12/April 24, 2008 In electroantennographic tests isosafrol, methyl salicylate, (ð)-lavandulol, geraniol, (E)-an- ethol, and -ionone evoked the largest responses from antennae of female or male Oxythyrea funesta (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae, Cetoniinae) adult beetles. In field trapping tests in Hun- gary the 1: 1 blend of (ð)-lavandulol and 2-phenylethanol attracted significantly more adult O. funesta than the single compounds. The addition of (E)-anethol, a previously described attractant for the species, was without effect. There was no difference in the responses of male or female beetles. The binary 2-phenylethanol/(ð)-lavandulol bait described in this study is recommended for the use in traps of O. funesta for agricultural purposes. Key words: (ð)-Lavandulol, 2-Phenylethanol, Oxythyrea funesta Introduction Also, since (E)-anethol was previously found to be attractive with low activity towards the adults Adults of Oxythyrea funesta Poda (Coleoptera: of O. funesta (To´ th et al., 2003), this compound Scarabaeidae, Cetoniinae) damage the reproduc- was also included into the combinations tested. tive parts of flowers of several ornamental plants and orchard trees. They are active during daytime; Materials and Methods during the night they hide in the soil (Hurpin, Baits 1962).
    [Show full text]
  • Field Response of Two Cetoniin Chafers, Cetonia Aurata Aurata And
    Field response of two cetoniin chafers (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) to floral compounds in ternary and binary combinations ZSÓFIA LOHONYAI1,2, JÓZSEF VUTS3, JÓZSEF FAIL2, MIKLÓS TÓTH1, ZOLTÁN IMREI1 1Plant Protection Institute, CAR HAS, H-1525, P.O. Box 102, Budapest, Hungary 2SZIU, Faculty of Horticultural Science, H-1118, Ménesi str. 44., Budapest, Hungary 3Rothamsted Research, West Common, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, AL5 2JQ, UK Abstract Several synthetic floral lures have been described for the cetoniin scarabs Cetonia aurata aurata L. and Potosia cuprea Fabr. (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae), exploiting their olfaction- guided behavioural preference for a wide range of flower volatiles. A ternary mixture of 3-methyl eugenol, 1-phenylethanol and (E)-anethol has previously been described as a powerful synthetic floral attractant for both C. a. aurata and P. cuprea. The first objective of the present research was to test whether isoeugenol and eugenol, with a very similar molecular structure to 3-methyl eugenol, can substitute 3-methyl eugenol in the ternary blend. All baited traps caught significantly more of both species than unbaited control traps, however, traps containing 3-methyl eugenol caught significantly more than those with either isoeugenol or eugenol. This indicates a fine tuning in behavioural response to 3-methyl eugenol. The second objective was to devise simpler attractant combinations for C. a. aurata and P. cuprea, based on previous field studies with synthetic floral compounds. Both C. a. aurata and P. cuprea showed strong attraction to the combination of 2-phenylethanol and 4- methoxyphenethyl alcohol, while the combination of 2-phenylethanol and 1,2,4- trimethoxybenzene resulted in medium-size catches, however, mostly catching P.
    [Show full text]
  • Antennal Lobe Architecture Across Coleoptera
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Variations on a Theme: Antennal Lobe Architecture across Coleoptera Martin Kollmann1, Rovenna Schmidt1,2, Carsten M. Heuer1,3, Joachim Schachtner1* 1 Department of BiologyÐAnimal Physiology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany, 2 Institute of Veterinary Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, Justus-Liebig University Gieûen, Gieûen, Germany, 3 Fraunhofer-Institut fuÈr Naturwissenschaftlich-Technische Trendanalysen INT, Euskirchen, Germany * [email protected] a11111 Abstract Beetles comprise about 400,000 described species, nearly one third of all known animal species. The enormous success of the order Coleoptera is reflected by a rich diversity of life- styles, behaviors, morphological, and physiological adaptions. All these evolutionary adap- tions that have been driven by a variety of parameters over the last about 300 million years, OPEN ACCESS make the Coleoptera an ideal field to study the evolution of the brain on the interface Citation: Kollmann M, Schmidt R, Heuer CM, between the basic bauplan of the insect brain and the adaptions that occurred. In the current Schachtner J (2016) Variations on a Theme: study we concentrated on the paired antennal lobes (AL), the part of the brain that is typically Antennal Lobe Architecture across Coleoptera. PLoS ONE 11(12): e0166253. doi:10.1371/journal. responsible for the first processing of olfactory information collected from olfactory sensilla pone.0166253 on antenna and mouthparts. We analyzed 63 beetle species from 22 different families and
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Status of the Beetles of Great Britain
    Natural England Commissioned Report NECR224 A review of the status of the beetles of Great Britain The stag beetles, dor beetles, dung beetles, chafers and their allies - Lucanidae, Geotrupidae, Trogidae and Scarabaeidae Species Status No.31 First published 31 October 2016 www.gov.uk/natural-england Foreword Natural England commission a range of reports from external contractors to provide evidence and advice to assist us in delivering our duties. The views in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of Natural England. Background Decisions about the priority to be attached to the conservation of species should be based upon objective assessments of the degree of threat to species. The internationally-recognised approach to undertaking this is by assigning species to one of the IUCN threat categories using the IUCN guidelines. This report was commissioned to update the national threat status of beetles within the Lucanidae, Geotrupidae, Trogidae and Scarabaeidae. It covers all species in these groups, identifying those that are rare and/or under threat as well as non-threatened and non- native species. Reviews for other invertebrate groups will follow. Natural England Project Manager – Jon Webb, [email protected] Contractor – Steve Lane [email protected] Authors – Steve A. Lane & Darren J. Mann Keywords – Scarabaeidae, Lucanidae, Geotrupidae, Trogidae, chafers, dung beetles, stag beetles, dor beetles, rhinoceros beetle, invertebrates, red list, IUCN, status reviews Further information This report can be downloaded from the Natural England Access to Evidence Catalogue: http://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/. For information on Natural England publications contact the Natural England Enquiry Service on 0300 060 3900 or e-mail [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • A New Key to the Suprageneric Taxa in the Beetle Family Cetoniidae, with Annotated Lists of the Known Genera
    A NEW KEY TO THE SUPRAGENERIC TAXA IN THE BEETLE FAMILY CETONIIDAE, WITH ANNOTATED LISTS OF THE KNOWN GENERA by J. KRIKKEN J. Krikken: A new key to the suprageneric taxa in the beetle family Cetoniidae, with annota• ted lists of the known genera. Zool. Verh. Leiden 210, 5-ix-1984: 1-75, figs. 1-86, 1 table. — ISSN 0024-1652. Key-words: Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidea, Cetoniidae; key, family-group taxa; checklist, genera. A revised key to the subfamilies, tribes and subtribes of the Cetoniidae (Coleoptera: Scara• baeoidea) is presented. Comments are given on the classification implied by the key, which inclu• des several redefinitions. All the known genera (ca. 510) are listed under their tribe or subtribe, the position of several being different from that in Schenkling's catalogues (1921, 1922). Referen• ces to recent synoptic literature are given. Eighteen new subtribes are proposed, the majority in the tribe Cremastocheilini. One new tribe is proposed, the Platygeniini. Attention is drawn to various new and neglected synonymies, original spellings, and other nomenclatural matters regar• ding family-group and genus-group names. The position of many genera is briefly discussed. Some striking features of the biogeography of the Cetoniidae are discussed, such as the high ge• neric endemicity for the major biogeographical regions (for the Madagascan, Afrotropical and Australasian regions ca. 90% or more). J. Krikken, Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie, P.O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, the Ne• therlands. CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 4 Purpose, limitations, cetoniid natural history 4 General taxonomic and nomenclatural comments 7 Technical explanation 9 Biogeographical summary 11 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Opinion Addressing the State of the Science on Risk Assessment 1 3 of Plant Protection Products for In-Soil Organisms
    EFSA Journal 20YY;volume(issue):NNNN 1 DRAFT SCIENTIFIC OPINION 2 Scientific Opinion addressing the state of the science on risk assessment 1 3 of plant protection products for in-soil organisms 4 EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR)2,3 5 European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy 6 ABSTRACT 7 Following a request from the European Food Safety Authority, the Panel on Plant Protection Products 8 and their Residues developed an opinion on the science behind the risk assessment of plant protection 9 products for in-soil organisms. The current risk assessment scheme is reviewed, taking into account 10 new regulatory frameworks and scientific developments. Proposals are made for specific protection 11 goals for in-soil organisms being key drivers for relevant ecosystem services in agricultural 12 landscapes such as nutrient cycling, soil structure, pest control and biodiversity. Considering the time- 13 scales and biological processes related to the dispersal of the majority of in-soil organisms compared 14 to terrestrial non-target arthropods living above soil, the Panel proposes that in-soil environmental risk 15 assessments are made at in- and off-field scale and field boundary levels. A new testing strategy 16 which takes into account the relevant exposure routes for in-soil organisms and the potential indirect 17 effects is proposed. In order to address species recovery and long-term impacts of PPPs, the use of 18 population models is proposed. 19 © European Food Safety Authority, 20YY 20 21 KEY WORDS 22 in soil-invertebrates, microorganisms, effects, pesticides, protection goals, risk assessment 23 1 On request from EFSA, Question No EFSA-Q-2011-00978, adopted on DD Month YYYY.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology and New Larval Descriptions for Three Cetoniine Beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Cetoniinae: Cetoniini: Cetoniina, Leucocelina)
    SYSTEMATICS Biology and New Larval Descriptions for Three Cetoniine Beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Cetoniinae: Cetoniini: Cetoniina, Leucocelina) E. MICO´ AND E. GALANTE Centro Iberoamericano de la Biodiversidad (CIBIO), Universidad de Alicante, 03080-Alicante, Spain Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/aesa/article/96/2/95/27977 by guest on 24 September 2021 Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 96(2): 95Ð106 (2003) ABSTRACT The larval morphology of Tropinota squalida (Scopoli) and Aethiessa floralis (Fabricius) is described. The latter is the Þrst description of a larva in this genus. The third-instar larva of Oxythyrea funesta (Poda) is redescribed. These species are included in a revised key to the larvae of Palaearctic Cetoniinae. The life cycle and larval biology of these ßower chafers are described. RESUMEN Se describe la morfologõ´a larvaria de Tropinota squalida (Scopoli) y Aethiessa floralis (Fabricius). Esta u´ ltima constituye la primera descripcio´n larvaria de este ge´nero. Se redescribe la larva de O. funesta (Poda). Las mencionadas especies Se han incluido en una clave de identiÞcacio´n para las larvas de las especies Palea´rticas de Cetoniinae. se describe el ciclo biolo´gico y la biologõ´a larvaria de dichas especies. KEY WORDS Scarabaeidae, Cetoniinae, Tropinota squalida, Oxythyrea funesta, Aethiessa floralis, larval biology Oxythyrea MULSANT (Cetoniini: Leucocelina), Tropi- tae) species are abundant (Mico´ and Galante 1998). nota Mulsant, and Aethiessa (Cetoniini: Cetoniina) The morphology and biology of the immature stages of Burmeister are small genera (10, 10, and 7 species, the genus Aethiessa were unknown until now. respectively) that occur in the Palaearctic region. The aims of our study were: 1) to describe the Tropinota squalida (Scopoli, 1763) is distributed in the third-instar larva of T.
    [Show full text]