DOCSLIB.ORG

Moshe Idel: Abulafia's Secrets of the Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Abulafia'sSecrets of the Guide: A LinguisticTurn I. BETWEEN JEWISH PHILOSOPHY AND KABBALAH IN MODERN SCHOLARSHIP The main purpose of this studyis to elucidate some aspects of the relations between some writingsof a mystic,Abraham Abulafia, the founderof ecstatic Kabbalah, and the medieval figurehe admiredmost, Maimonides, the founderof JewishAristotelianism. This issue is to be understoodas part of a much broader topic,which is fundamentalfor the understanding of theJewish speculative corpora in theMiddle Ages: therelation between philosophy and mysticism.As seen below, this issue has been alreadyaborded by several scholars,one of the most eminent among thembeing Prof.Alexander Altmann. Therefore, before dwelling upon the details of the particularquestion let me surveybriefly the state of the field. The relationshipbetween philosophyand mysticismin Judaismhas been dis- cussed severaltimes by manyscholars and thinkers.Two of them,David Neumark1 and Franz Rosenzweig2have proposed a theory,which may be designatedas the « pendulum theory», whose basic assumptionis the existence of oscillations betweenthe dominanceof the speculativeand the mysticalin Jewishthought. The emergenceof the centraltrend in medieval Jewishmysticism, Kabbalah, is por- trayedby them as a reaction to the ascent of Jewish philosophyin the form presentedby Maimonides's Guide of the Perplexed.These authorsassume thatthe fluctuationbetween speculation and mysticismis to be tracedto ancienttimes, the medieval period being the most obvious and importantepisode of this ongoing oscillation.Motivated by a deep aversion toward Kabbalah, HeinrichGraetz, the most important19th century Jewish historian, has alreadyconsidered Kabbalah to be a pernicious medieval innovation,or invention,aiming to counteractthe influenceof the « enlightening» Aristotelianismof the « Great eagle »3. Last but not least, GershomScholem emphasizedthe importanceof the encounterbetween 1. Geschichteder juedischenPhilosophie des Mittelalters,Berlin, 1907, vol. I, d. 179-236. 2. KleinereSchriften, Berlin, 1937, p. 531. See also my remarkson this stand of Rosen- zweig's in « Franz Rosenzweigand the Kabbalah » in P. Mendes-Flohr, ed., The Philosophy of Franz Rosenzweig,University Press of New England. 1987. d. 168-171. 3. Geschichteder Juden,Leipzig, 1908, vol. VII, p. 385-402; For an adaptationof Graetz's thesis,with major changes, see my Kabbalah: New Perspectives,New Haven, London, 1988, p. 251-253; « Maimonidesand Kabbalah », in I. Twersky (ed.), Studiesin Maimonides,Cam- bridge,1990, p. 31-33; see too Mark Verman, The Book of Contemplation,Medieval Jewish MysticalSources, Albany,Suny, 1992, p. 20-24. Revue de Métaphysiqueet de Morale, N° 4/1998 496 Moshe Idei an alleged mythicalGnosticism, presumably transmitted in Jewishesoteric circles for centurieson the one hand,and the philosophicalNeoplatonism as representedby the variousmedieval versions on theother hand, as his mainphenomenological description of the emergenceof Kabbalah4.Though Scholem did not ignorethe potentialimpact of the controversyconcerning Maimonides' writings on the earlyKabbalists, he was inclinedto regardit as a secondaryfactor; he indeed observedthe affinitybetween the opponentsto the Jewishphilosopher and thosewho were mysticallybiasecf . Jewishphilosophy and Kabbalah have, however,more oftenbeen regardedby some medieval thinkersand modernscholars as considerablydistinct speculative trends,a view to which I agree. If not always opposing each other,or competing for a impacton the souls and minds of the intelligentsia,they were portrayedas essentiallydiverse types of spirituality.Roughly speaking, this seems to me to be true, but only if we address the extremeforms of Kabbalah and philosophy. However, a perusal of JuliusGuttmann's Philosophies of Judaism,and Gershom Scholem's Major Trendsin JewishMysticism will put his dichotomyin medieval Jewishspeculation in a rathersharper relief. The two summae of long years of researchby the two great scholars who had establishedthe Jerusalemitestandard of research in their respectivefields, are not inclined to offermore synthetic surveysof the whole field of Jewishthought, and then locate theirown specific area of research.Jewish mysticism is marginalizedin Guttmann'sPhilosophies of Judaismwhile Jewishphilosophy is only rarelytreated in details in Scholem's Major Trends.A perusalof theextensive corpus of H.A. Wolfson,another colossus of the studyof Jewishphilosophy, reveals the same marginalizationof Kabbalah, by a major historianof Jewishthought. However,this initial strongdemarcation of areas did not remainso influential in the subsequentscholarship of Jewishthought. Other scholars, belonging to the next generation,the most importantamong them being the late Professors Alexander Altmann,Georges Vajda and - later on in their writings- also Shelomo Pines, JosephB. Sermonetaon the one hand or Isadore Twersky,Colette Sirat and S. O. Heller Wilenskyon the other,were less predisposedtoward strong dichotomies6.Especially importantfrom our point of view is the concept of « rationalmysticism » whichrecurs in scholarshipmore oftenlyin recentdecades, underthe impactof some of the aforementionedscholars, more eminently Georges Vajda, and therecurring attempts of scholars,in boththe historyof Aristotelianism 4. Kabbalah, New York, 1974, p. 45: « Kabbalah, in its historicalsignificance, can be definedas the productof the interpénétrationof JewishGnosticism and neoplatonism». 5. G. Scholem, Origins of the Kabbalah, tr. A. Arkush,R. J. Zwi Werblowsky (ed.), PrincetonUniversity Press, Princeton,jps, Philadelphia,1987, p. 404-414. See, however,his statementin Major Trendsin JewishMysticism, New York, 1967, p. 24: « Kabbalah certainly did not arise as reactionagainst philosophical 'enlightenment' »; as well as his « Me-Hoqer li-Mequbbal», Tarbiz, vol. 6, 1935, p. 91-92 [Hebrew]; « Maïmonide dans l'œuvre des Kabbalistes», Cahiersjuifs, vol. 3, 1935, p. 104-105. 6. GeorgesVajda, « Un chapitrede l'histoiredu conflitentre la Kabbale et la philosophie: la polémique anti-intellectualistede Josephb. Shalom Ashkenazi» in Archivesd'histoire Abulafia's Secrets of the Guide : A LinguisticTurn 497 and Neoplatonism,to highlightthe more mysticalimplications of those formsof thought7.A medieval example of an effortto bridge the gap between the two domainsof speculationis the attemptof some circlesof Kabbaliststo draw Maimo- nides' Guide of the Perplexedon the side of the mystics8.On the otherhand, there were Kabbalists,few indeed,who claimed thatKabbalah is the innerphilosophy9. More recently,more mystical readings of Maimonides'Guide of thePerplexed have been proposed by some scholars10,while the wide range of the philosophical sourcesand speculativeinterpretations of the Kabbalistictypes of thought,received more and more attentionin scholarship11.A crucial phase in the substantial doctrinaleet littérairedu MoyenAge, vol. XXXI, 1956, p. 45-127, idem,Recherches sur la philosophieet la Kabbale dans la pensée juive du Moyen Age, Paris, Mouton, 1962; ibid., « Commentle philosophejuif Moïse de Narbonnecomprenait-il les paroles extatiquesdes soufis?» Actas del primercongreso de estudiosarabes islámicos,Madrid, 1964, p. 129-135; « Recherchessur la synthèsephilosophico-kabbalistique de Samuel ibn Motot», Ahdlma, vol. XXVII, 1960, p. 29-63. AlexanderAltmann, « Moses Narboni'sEpistle on Shfur Qomah », in A. Altmann (ed.), Jewish Medieval and Renaissance Studies, Cambridge, Mass. 1967, p. 242-244, ibid., « LurianicKabbalah in a PlatonicKey: AbrahamCohen Herrera's Puertadel Cielo », Hebrew Union College Annual,vol. 53, 1982, p. 321-324, as well as note 15 below. Dov Schwartz, « ContactsBetween JewishPhilosophy and Mysticismin the Rise of the FifteenthCentury », Daat, vol. 29, 1992, p. 41-68 [Hebrew]. 7. P. Hadot, Exercicesspirituels, Annuaire de la Ve sectionde l'École pratiquedes Hautes Études LXXXIV, p. 25-70; Phillip Merlan, Monopsychism,Mysticism, Metaconsciouness, Hague, 1963, RichardT. Wallis, « Nous as Experience», R. Baine Harris, (ed.), The Signi- ficance of Neoplatonism,Norfolk, 1976, p. 122 and 143 note 1 forthe pertinentbibliography; Michael Morgan, Platonic Piety,Philosophy & Ritual in Fourth-CenturyAthens, Yale Uni- versityPress, New Haven, London, 1990. 8. Scholem, « Mi-Hoqer li-Mequbbal». 9. M. Idel, «Major Currentsin Italian Kabbalah between 1560-1660», Italia Judaica [Roma, 1986], II, p. 243-262; reprintedin D.B. Ruderman,ed., Essential Papers on Jewish Culturein Renaissance and Baroque Italy [New York UniversityPress, New York, 1992], pp. 345-368. 10. David Blumenthal, « Maimonides' IntellectualistMysticism and the Superiorityof the Prophecyof Moses », Studies in Medieval Culture,vol. X, 198l,p. 51-67. 11. Ze'ev Harvey, «Kabbalistic Elements in R. Hasdai Cresças' book Or ha-Shem», JerusalemStudies in Jewish Thought,vol. 2, 1983, p. 75-109 [Hebrew]; Moshe Hayyim Weiler, « Inquiriesin the KabbalisticTerminology of R. JosephGikatilla and its Relationto Maimonides», HUCA vol.37, 1966, p. 13-44 [Hebrew]; Elliot R. Wolfson, « Merkavah Traditionsin PhilosophicalGarb: JudahHalevi Reconsidered», Proceedingsof theAmerican Academyfor JewishResearch, vol. LVII, 1991, p. 179-242; Charles Mopsik, «Philosophie et souci philosophique:les deux grandscourants de la pensee juive », Archiviodi filosofìa vol. LXI, 1993, p. 247-254; Dov Schwartz, « Divine Immanence in Medieval Jewish Philosophy», Journalfor JewishThought and Philosophy,vol. Ill, no. 2, 1994, p. 249-278; Idel, « Divine Attributesand Sefirot in Jewish Theology»,
Recommended publications
  • Conceptualizations of Tzimtzum in Baroque Italian Kabbalah

    Conceptualizations of Tzimtzum in Baroque Italian Kabbalah

    Conceptualizations of Tzimtzum in Baroque Italian Kabbalah Moshe Idel Abstract The paper will survey the ways in which three Kabbalists active in Italy at the end of the 16th and early 17th centuries transformed the Lurianic concept of divine contraction: Menahem Azariah of Fano, Joseph Shlomo of Candia, and Abraham Herrera. The main point of this essay is to analyze the contribution of philosophical concepts to the inter- pretion of Luria’s mythopoeic method. Tzimtzum: A Constellation of Ideas The concept of tzimtzum, understood as divine contraction, or alternatively, as divine withdrawal when it refers to the first act of the theogonic/cosmo- gonic process, has enjoyed a distinguished career in Kabbalistic texts and their scholarship.1 Earlier scholars believed tzimtzum was an original contribution 1 See, e.g., David Neumark, Toledot ha-Filosofiah be-Yisrael, vol. 1, 1921 (New York: A.Y. Shtibl, 1971), 179–80; Gershom Scholem, Origins of the Kabbalah, trans. Allan Arkush, ed. R.Z.J. Werblowsky, (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1987), 449–50; idem, Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism, (New York: Schocken Books, 1960), 260–64, especially 411 n. 51, 412 n. 77; idem, Kabbalah ( Jerusalem: Keter, 1974), 129–35; Lawrence Fine, Physician of the Soul, Healer of the Cosmos: Isaac Luria and His Kabbalistic Fellowship (Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003), 128–31; Daphne Freedman, Man and the Theogony in the Lurianic Kabbalah (Pistakaway, NJ: Gorgias Press, 2006), 27–42; Joseph Avivi, Kabbalah Luriana, vol. 3 ( Jerusalem: Ben Zvi Institute, 2008), 1184–88; Christoph Schulte, “Zimzum in the Works of Schelling,” Iyyun 41 (1992): 21–40; idem, “Zimzum in der Kabbala Denudata,” Morgen-Glantz 7 (1997): 127–40; idem, “Zimzum in European Philosophy, A Paradoxical Career,” in Jewish Studies in a New Europe: Proceedings of the Fifth Congress of Jewish Studies in Copenhagen 1994 under the Auspices of the European Association for Jewish Studies, ed.
  • 1 Beginning the Conversation

    1 Beginning the Conversation

    NOTES 1 Beginning the Conversation 1. Jacob Katz, Exclusiveness and Tolerance: Jewish-Gentile Relations in Medieval and Modern Times (New York: Schocken, 1969). 2. John Micklethwait, “In God’s Name: A Special Report on Religion and Public Life,” The Economist, London November 3–9, 2007. 3. Mark Lila, “Earthly Powers,” NYT, April 2, 2006. 4. When we mention the clash of civilizations, we think of either the Spengler battle, or a more benign interplay between cultures in individual lives. For the Spengler battle, see Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996). For a more benign interplay in individual lives, see Thomas L. Friedman, The Lexus and the Olive Tree (New York: Farrar, Straus, Giroux, 1999). 5. Micklethwait, “In God’s Name.” 6. Robert Wuthnow, America and the Challenges of Religious Diversity (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005). “Interview with Robert Wuthnow” Religion and Ethics Newsweekly April 26, 2002. Episode no. 534 http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/week534/ rwuthnow.html 7. Wuthnow, America and the Challenges of Religious Diversity, 291. 8. Eric Sharpe, “Dialogue,” in Mircea Eliade and Charles J. Adams, The Encyclopedia of Religion, first edition, volume 4 (New York: Macmillan, 1987), 345–8. 9. Archbishop Michael L. Fitzgerald and John Borelli, Interfaith Dialogue: A Catholic View (London: SPCK, 2006). 10. Lily Edelman, Face to Face: A Primer in Dialogue (Washington, DC: B’nai B’rith, Adult Jewish Education, 1967). 11. Ben Zion Bokser, Judaism and the Christian Predicament (New York: Knopf, 1967), 5, 11. 12. Ibid., 375.
  • A Novel Look at Moshe Idel's East-West Problem

    A Novel Look at Moshe Idel's East-West Problem

    Access Provided by UCLA Library at 05/07/12 5:15PM GMT T HE J EWISH Q UARTERLY R EVIEW, Vol. 102, No. 2 (Spring 2012) 289–296 ANovelLookatMoshe Idel’s East-West Problem DAVID N. MYERS UCLA MOSHE IDEL. Old Worlds, New Mirrors: On Jewish Mysticism and Twentieth- Century Thought. Jewish Culture and Contexts. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2009. Pp. 336. FOR MANY OF US in the field of Jewish studies, but not in the field of Kabbalah studies, our first encounter with Moshe Idel came in 1988 with the publication of his major work in English, Kabbalah: New Perspectives. Although he had been working in the field for more than a decade, from the time of his 1976 dissertation at the Hebrew University on Avraham REVIEW FORUM Abulafia, it was Kabbalah: New Perspectives that brought Idel to wide public attention, announcing his own substantial methodological and substantive disagreements with the towering figure of modern Kabbalah studies, Ger- shom Scholem. Since then, Idel has gone on to attain a position of international distinc- tion, publishing at a staggering rate in Kabbalah studies, and many fields beyond. In the process, he—like Scholem before and Wolfson and others after him—has used the study of Kabbalah as a gateway of inquiry into important methodological, theoretical, hermeneutical, philosophical, and historical questions. This leads us to the book at hand, Old Worlds, New Mirrors: On Jewish Mysticism and Twentieth-Century Thought, which is indeed an inquiry into important methodological, theoretical, philosophical, and historical ques- tions. It reflects Idel’s brilliant, capacious, probing, and wildly imagina- tive mind, as it ranges over terrain somewhat less familiar to him and his usual readers, but of critical significance to his overarching intellectual and cultural Weltanschauung.
  • Abraham Abulafia

    Abraham Abulafia

    PROPHETIC/ECSTATIC KABBALAH; ABRAHAM ABULAFIA (Deut. 16:16: Three times a year--on the Feast of Unleavened Bread, on the Feast of Weeks, and on the Feast of Booths—-all your males shall appear (yei- ra’eh) before the Lord your God in the place that He will choose.) Yochanan ben Dahavai said in the name of Rabbi Yehudah: A man who is blind in one eye is exempt from appearing (at the Temple on the Pilgrimage festivals, as it is said: yir’eh (He will see), yei-ra’eh (He will be seen). [Both words are represented with the same letters. Thus the text lends itself to the following interpretation:] As He comes to see, so He comes to be seen; just as (He comes) to see with both eyes, so also (He is) to be seen with both eyes. ---Talmud, Chagigah 2a A great secret [concerning a teaching in Midrash Bereshit Rabbah 27:1]: “Great is the power of the prophets, who make the form resemble its Former.” We have already explained what seems to be the meaning of this secret, but I then found a passage from one of the earlier authors on this subject, and my heart urges me to record it, for it offers an explanation of the foregoing. The following is the text of that account. The deeply learned Rabbi Nathan, of blessed memory, said to me: “The complete secret of prophecy to a prophet consists in that suddenly he sees the form of his self standing before him, and he forgets his own self and ignores it...and that form speaks with him and tells him the future.
  • Metamorphoses of a Platonic Theme in Jewish Mysticism

    Metamorphoses of a Platonic Theme in Jewish Mysticism

    MOSHE IDEL METAMORPHOSES OF A PLATONIC THEME IN JEWISH MYSTICISM 1. KABBALAH AND NEOPLATONISM Both the early Jewish philosophers – Philo of Alexandria and R. Shlomo ibn Gabirol, for example – and the medieval Kabbalists were acquainted with and influenced by Platonic and Neoplatonic sources.1 However, while the medieval philosophers were much more systematic in their borrowing from Neoplatonic sources, especially via their transformations and transmissions from Arabic sources and also but more rarely from Christian sources, the Kabbalists were more sporadic and fragmentary in their appropriation of Neoplatonism. Though the emergence of Kabbalah has often been described by scholars as the synthesis of Neoplatonism and Gnosticism,2 I wonder not only about the role attributed to Gnosticism in the formation of early Kabbalah, but also about the possi- bly exaggerated role assigned to Neoplatonism. Not that I doubt the im- pact of Neoplatonism, but I tend to regard the Neoplatonic elements as somewhat less formative for the early Kabbalah than what is accepted by scholars.3 We may, however, assume a gradual accumulation of Neoplatonic 1 G. Scholem, ‘The Traces of ibn Gabirol in Kabbalah’, Me’assef Soferei Eretz Yisrael (Tel- Aviv, 1960), pp. 160–78 (Hebrew); M. Idel, ‘Jewish Kabbalah and Platonism in the Middle Ages and Renaissance’, in Neoplatonism and Jewish Thought, ed. L. E. Goodman (Albany: SUNY Press, 1993), pp. 319–52; M. Idel, ‘The Magical and Neoplatonic Interpretations of Kabbalah in the Renaissance’, Jewish Thought in the Sixteenth Century, ed. B. D. Cooperman (Cambridge, MA, 1983), pp. 186–242. 2 G. Scholem, Origins of the Kabbalah (tr.
  • Interpreting Diagrams from the Sefer Yetsirah and Its Commentaries 1

    Interpreting Diagrams from the Sefer Yetsirah and Its Commentaries 1

    NOTES 1 Word and Image in Medieval Kabbalah: Interpreting Diagrams from the Sefer Yetsirah and Its Commentaries 1. The most notorious example of these practices is the popularizing work of Aryeh Kaplan. His critical editions of the SY and the Sefer ha Bahir are some of the most widely read in the field because they provide the texts in Hebrew and English with comprehensive and useful appendices. However, these works are deeply problematic because they dehistoricize the tradi- tion by adding later diagrams to earlier works. For example, in his edition of the SY he appends eighteenth-century diagrams to later versions of this tenth-century text. Popularizers of kabbalah such as Michael Berg of the Kabbalah Centre treat the Zohar as a second-century rabbinic tract without acknowledging textual evidence to the contrary. See his introduction to the Centre’s translation of the Zohar: P. S. Berg. The Essential Zohar. New York: Random House, 2002. 2. For a variety of reasons, kabbalistic works were transmitted in manuscript form long after other works, such as the Hebrew Bible, the Talmud, and their commentaries were widely available in print. This is true in large part because kabbalistic treatises were “private” works, transmitted from teacher to student. Kabbalistic manuscripts were also traditionally transmitted in manuscript form because of their provenance. The Maghreb and other parts of North Africa were important centers of later mystical activity, and print technology came quite late to these regions, with manuscript culture persisting well into the nineteenth, and even into the mid- twentieth century in some regions.
  • The Archetype of the Tzaddiq in Hasidic Tradition

    The Archetype of the Tzaddiq in Hasidic Tradition

    THE ARCHETYPE OF THE TZADDIQ IN HASIDIC TRADITION A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF RELIGION AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA IN CONJUNCTION wlTH THE DEPARTMENT OF RELIGIOUS STUDIES AT THE UNIVERSITY OF WINNIPEG IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS BY YA'QUB IBN YUSUF August4, 1992 National Library B¡bliothèque nat¡onale E*E du Canada Acquisitions and D¡rection des acquisilions et B¡bliographic Services Branch des services bibliograPhiques 395 Wellinolon Slreêl 395, rue Wellington Oflawa. Oñlario Ottawa (Ontario) KlA ON4 K1A ON4 foùt t¡te vat¡e ¡élëte^ce Ou l¡te Nate élëtenæ The author has granted an L'auteur a accordé une licence irrevocable non-exclusive licence irrévocable et non exclusive allowing the National Library of permettant à la Bibliothèque Canada to reproduce, loan, nationale du Canada de distribute or sell cop¡es of reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou his/her thesis by any means and vendre des copies de sa thèse in any form or format, making de quelque manière et sous this thesis available to interested quelque forme que ce soit pour persons. mettre des exemplaires de cette thèse à la disposition des personnes intéressées. The author retains ownership of L'auteur conserve la propriété du the copyright in his/her thesis. droit d'auteur qui protège sa Neither the thesis nor substantial thèse. Ni la thèse ni des extraits extracts from it may be printed or substantiels de celle-ci ne otherwise reproduced without doivent être imprimés ou his/her permission. autrement reproduits sans son autorisation, ïsBN ø-315-7796Ø-S
  • Intellectual Mysticism in the Visión Deleitable

    Intellectual Mysticism in the Visión Deleitable

    religions Article “El entendimiento con el qual me conoscan”: Intellectual Mysticism in the Visión Deleitable Michelle M. Hamilton Center for Medieval Studies, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; [email protected] Received: 6 October 2019; Accepted: 17 December 2019; Published: 20 December 2019 Abstract: Visión deleytable is a fictional tale based in the Aristotelian philosophical and Neoplatonic mystical beliefs of the Judeo-Arabic tradition of medieval Iberia. This fifteenth-century work of imaginative fiction, a “best-seller” among Iberian readers, tells of the ascent of the active intellect to the celestial spheres and an experience of God. In this narrative, knowledge of the Latin trivium and quadrivium are combined with that of the Arabo-Andalusi philosophic traditions. Particularly noteworthy is the author, De la Torre’s extensive use of Maimonides’ work, the Guide of the Perplexed, as a source for the wisdom revealed in the Visión deleytable. While Maimonides’ position on the mystic experience is debated by contemporary scholars, in the present study I explore how the concept of intellectual mysticism, applied to the Neoplatonic/Aristotelian model of the intellect’s conjunction with the divine as found in Maimonides’ work, also describes the goal toward which the protagonist (and reader) of the Visión deleytable strive. As such, the Visión deleytable reveals how this notion of human-divine union (most notably in the concept of the “prophet-angel”) from the Judeo-Andalusi tradition, transmitted in Arabic and Hebrew, was translated into Spanish and adopted into the Catholic and converso frameworks of the Visión deleytable in fifteenth-century Iberia. Keywords: spanish medieval literature; converso literature; Maimonides; early print works; alfonso de la torre; spanish intellectual history; manuscript studies; prophecy; andalusi philosophy; spanish allegory Alfonso de la Torre’s Visión deleitable (Visión), composed c.
  • Kabbalah and the Subversion of Traditional Jewish Society in Early Modern Europe

    Kabbalah and the Subversion of Traditional Jewish Society in Early Modern Europe

    Kabbalah and the Subversion of Traditional Jewish Society in Early Modern Europe David B. Ruderman Most discussions about notions of authority and dissent in early mod- em Europe usually imply those embedded in Christian traditions, whether Protestant or Catholic. To address these same issues from the perspective of Jewish culture in early modem Europe is to consider the subject from a relatively different vantage point. The small Jewish com- munities of the fifteenth through seventeenth centuries were shaped in manifold ways by the norms and values of the Christian and Moslem host civilizations to which they belonged. Yet, they were also heirs to powerful rabbinic religious and political traditions that structured their social relationships and shaped their attitudes towards divine law, human responsibility, communal discipline, and authority. To examine their uni- verse of discourse in its proper context is to view it both in its own cul- tural terms and in its dialogue and negotiation with the non-Jewish world. No period in Jewish cultural history has undergone more radical refor- mulation and revision by recent scholarship than the early modem; though to what extent conventional schemes of periodization like "early modern," "Renaissance," or "baroque" can be meaningfully applied to the Jewish cultural experience is a question which still engenders much discussion and debate.' Equally problematic is a proper evaluation of the kabbalah, the traditions of Jewish mystical and esoteric experience, 1. For recent discussions of the meaning of the Renaissance and baroque when applied to Jewish culture, see D. B. Ruderman, "The Italian Renaissance and Jewish Thought," in Renaissance Humanism: Foundations and Forms, 3 vols., ed.
  • A Whiteheadian Interpretation of the Zoharic Creation Story

    A Whiteheadian Interpretation of the Zoharic Creation Story

    A WHITEHEADIAN INTERPRETATION OF THE ZOHARIC CREATION STORY by Michael Gold A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of The Dorothy F. Schmidt College of Arts and Letters in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Florida Atlantic University Boca Raton, Florida May 2016 Copyright 2016 by Michael Gold ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author wishes to express sincere gratitude to his committee members, Professors Marina Banchetti, Frederick E. Greenspahn, Kristen Lindbeck, and Eitan Fishbane for their encouragement and support throughout this project. iv ABSTRACT Author: Michael Gold Title: A Whiteheadian Interpretation of the Zoharic Creation Story Institution: Florida Atlantic University Dissertation Advisor: Dr. Marina P. Banchetti Degree: Doctor of Philosophy Year: 2016 This dissertation presents a Whiteheadian interpretation of the notions of mind, immanence and process as they are addressed in the Zohar. According to many scholars, this kabbalistic creation story as portrayed in the Zohar is a reaction to the earlier rabbinic concept of God qua creator, which emphasized divine transcendence over divine immanence. The medieval Jewish philosophers, particularly Maimonides influenced by Aristotle, placed particular emphasis on divine transcendence, seeing a radical separation between Creator and creation. With this in mind, these scholars claim that one of the goals of the Zohar’s creation story was to emphasize God’s immanence within creation. Similar to the Zohar, the process metaphysics of Alfred North Whitehead and his followers was reacting to the substance metaphysics that had dominated Western philosophy as far back as ancient Greek thought. Whitehead adopts a very similar narrative to that of the Zohar.
  • Divine Manifestations in the Slavonic Pseudepigrapha Orientalia Judaica Christiana

    Divine Manifestations in the Slavonic Pseudepigrapha Orientalia Judaica Christiana

    Divine Manifestations in the Slavonic Pseudepigrapha Orientalia Judaica Christiana 2 Orientalia Judaica Christiana, the Christian Orient and its Jewish Heritage, is dedicated, first of all, to the afterlife of the Jewish Second Temple traditions within the traditions of the Christian East. A second area of exploration is some priestly (non-Talmudic) Jewish traditions that survived in the Christian environment Divine Manifestations in the Slavonic Pseudepigrapha Andrei Orlov govg'ms press 2009 For law and June Fair ... Then the old man stood up and stretched his hands to­ wards heaven. His fingers became like ten lamps of fire and he said to him, "If you will, you can become all flame/5 Apophthegmata Patrum, Joseph of Panephysis, 7. Abba Bessarion, at the point of death, said, "The monk ought to be as the Cherubim and the Seraphim: all eye." Apophthegmata Patrum, Bessarion, 11. TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface xv Locations of the Original Publications xvii List of Abbreviations xix INTRODUCTION. The Kavod and Shem Paradigms and Divine Manifestations in the Slavonic Pseudepigrapha 1 Silvanus and Anthony. 3 Moses and Elijah 8 Enoch and Abraham 12 PART I: THE DIVINE BODY TRADITIONS 19 "Without Measure and Without Analogy": The Tradition of the Divine Body in 2 (Slavonic) Enoch 21 Introduction 21 Adamic Tradition of 2 Enoch 23 The Corporeality of the Protoplast 26 From the Four Corners of the World 29 The Measure of the Divine Body. 34 Bodily Ascent 37 Adam and Enoch: "Two Powers" in Heaven 38 Two Bodies Created According to the Likeness of the Third One 43 The Pillar of the World: The Eschatological Role of the Seventh Antediluvian Hero in 2 (Slavonic) Enoch 49 Introduction 49 I.
  • Relazioni a Tema Libero

    Relazioni a Tema Libero

    RELAZIONI A TEMA LIBERO Andreina Contessa LA RAPPRESENTAZIONE DELL’ARCA DELL’ALLEANZA NEI MANOSCRITTI EBRAICI E CRISTIANI DELLA SPAGNA MEDIEVALE L’arca dell’alleanza e` uno dei motivi ico- un periodo che va dalla fine del secolo XIII al nografici maggiormente raffigurati nell’arte tardo XV, nelle quali vengono ordinatamente ebraica antica e medievale. Simbolo dell’al- assemblati gli oggetti del santuario e del Tem- leanza e dell’incontro spirituale tra l’uomo e pio 1. L’esempio piu` antico e` una Bibbia di To- Dio, questo cofano di legno di acacia rivestito ledo del 1277 che si trova attualmente presso di oro puro dentro e fuori, sormontato dai che- la Biblioteca Palatina di Parma (MS 2668, rubini era custodito nella parte piu` interna e fols. 7v-8) 2. Sui due fogli gli oggetti sono di- inaccessibile del Santuario descritto nell’Esodo sposti in modo arbitrario, non legato cioe` alla (37,1-9) e poi nel Tempio. L’arca dell’alleanza, loro disposizione nel Santuario, e sono visti di fatto, e`ilprimo oggetto d’arte del quale par- frontalmente cosı`dacreare un legame tra tutti la la Bibbia, aprendo la lunga lista delle istru- gli elementi, ciascuno accompagnato da una zioni per la costruzione del tabernacolo. Essa e` scritta esplicativa solo parzialmente conserva- descritta nella Bibbia con una minuzia e una ta (Fig. 1). chiarezza straordinarie, eppure essa sara` rap- Soltanto un oggetto e` racchiuso in una presentata visivamente soltanto dopo la sua cornice verde a carattere vegetale: l’arca del- scomparsa, fatto questo che ne accresce il ca- l’alleanza, riconoscibile dalle tavole della Leg- rattere simbolico di oggetto del passato, che di- ge sormontate dai cherubini, denominati ke- viene portatore di una valenza messianica.