DOCSLIB.ORG

Maloti Minnow Survey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Maloti Minnow Survey MALOTI MINNOW SURVEY MOHALE AND EASTERN ESU AUGUST 2017 Prepared by: Advance Africa Management Services Authors: McCafferty, J. R., Monongoaha, P., Mapheelle, M., Morokole, N., Ntsohi, R and Hecht, T. Prepared for: Lesotho Highlands Development Authority Abstract A fish distribution survey was undertaken in the Lesotho Highlands from 31 July – 16 August 2017 to re-assess the status of both evolutionary significant units of the Maloti minnow Pseudobarbus quathlambae. A total of 13 rivers and 42 sites were surveyed. P. quathlambae (Mohale ESU) is no longer present in the Senqunyane, Bokong and the Jorodane River (below Pampiri Falls) upstream of Mohale Dam. The disappearance of P. quathlambae from these primary habitat rivers is most likely a result of predation by and competition for habitat and food from smallmouth yellowfish Labeobarbus aeneus. The construction of a barrier in the Senqunyane to protect P. quathlambae is no longer necessary. Unless a programme focussing on the eradication of L. aeneus and restocking of P. quathlambae is initiated, construction of a barrier at this stage would serve no purpose. Populations of translocated P. quathlambae (Mohale ESU) were recorded in the Jorodane- (above Pampiri Falls) (n = 38), Makhaleng- (n = 11), and Maletsunyane River (n = 41). No fish were recorded in the Quthing River. P. quathlambae (Eastern ESU) was recorded in the Tsoelikane- (n = 15), Sani- (n=2), Mothae- (n = 7), upper Matsoku- (n = 33), Senqu- (n = 15) and Moremoholo River (n = 33). The Maloti minnow is not extinct below the Tsoelikane Falls as previously thought. Very few P. quathlambae were recorded in the Sani- and Mothae River and none were present in the lower Matsoku River. No rainbow trout (O. mykiss) were recorded in any of the rivers surveyed. The health and size of various minnow populations cannot be accurately determined at this stage. It is recommended that a follow-up survey be conducted in early summer to better understand the population dynamics of the translocated populations and the Eastern ESU populations. These surveys should incorporate river health and rangeland assessments to provide baseline data for future monitoring of the populations. Once the status of the populations has been established then a new management plan and conservation actions must be prepared and implemented. This should include a monitoring programme which incorporates aquatic and terrestrial components. It is recommended that a workshop is held to develop a roadmap for the conservation of P. quathlambae in the Lesotho Highlands. i Table of Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................................ i 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 The Mohale ESU ............................................................................................................................ 2 1.2 The Eastern ESU ............................................................................................................................ 4 1.3 Objectives...................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Methods .............................................................................................................................. 5 2.1 Mohale ESU Survey sites ............................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Eastern ESU Survey sites ............................................................................................................... 6 2.3 Sampling Methods ........................................................................................................................ 7 2.4 Data Analyses ................................................................................................................................ 9 3. Results ............................................................................................................................... 10 3.1 Mohale ESU – Native Range ........................................................................................................ 10 3.2 Mohale ESU – Translocated Range ............................................................................................. 11 3.3 Eastern ESU ................................................................................................................................. 14 4. Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 19 4.1. Mohale ESU – Native Range ....................................................................................................... 19 4.2. Mohale ESU – Translocated Range ............................................................................................ 19 4.3. Eastern ESU ................................................................................................................................ 20 5. Conclusions ....................................................................................................................... 24 6. Recommendations ............................................................................................................. 25 7. References ......................................................................................................................... 27 Acknowledgements.................................................................................................................... 28 APPENDIX A ............................................................................................................................... 30 APPENDIX B ............................................................................................................................... 30 ii List of Acronyms and Abbreviations BMU – Biodiversity Management Unit CPUE – Catch per unit effort ESU – Evolutionarily significant unit FSL – Full supply level IBT – Inter-basin transfer IUCN – International Union for Conservation of Nature KZN – Kwazulu-Natal LHDA – Lesotho Highlands Development Authority LHWP – Lesotho Highlands Water Project MU – Management Unit PERMANOVA - Permanent multivariate analysis of variance List of Figures Figure 1: The Maloti minnow (Pseudobarbus quathlambae) ................................................................. 1 Figure 2: Distribution of the Mohale ESU and the Eastern ESU in the Lesotho Highlands (Source: Shelton et al., 2016) ................................................................................................................................ 2 Figure 3: Survey sites for the Mohale ESU and the Eastern ESU, August 2017. ..................................... 5 Figure 4: A – Connecting the SAMUS 1000 E Electrofisher; B – Electrofishing on the Bokong River; C – Maloti minnows kept alive in buckets; D – Maloti minnow ................................................................... 8 Figure 5: Measurements of channel width and water quality were conducted at each site ................. 8 Figure 6: Length frequency distributions of P. quathlambae recorded in the Jorodane- (above Pampiri Falls), Makhaleng-, and Maletsunyane Rivers. ..................................................................................... 13 Figure 7: A = Adult P. quathlambae, Jorodane River; B = adult P. quathlambae, Makhaleng River; C = juvenile P. quathlambae, Maletsunyane River. .................................................................................... 14 Figure 8: CPUE (fish/hr) from sampling sites on the Mothae River, April 2011 and August 2017. ...... 16 Figure 9: Length frequency distributions of P. quathlambae recorded in the Tsoelikane-, Sani-, Mothae- Matsoku-, Senqu- and Moremoholo Rivers, August 2017. ................................................................... 17 Figure 10: Principle component analysis biplot summarising habitat conditions in the Tsoelikane, Mangaung, Sani, Mothae, Matsoku (upper), Matsoku (lower), Senqu and Moremoholo Rivers, August 2017. PC 1 represents 44.6%, and PC 2 represents 21.5%, of the total variation in habitat conditions (based on the selected variables) among sites. .................................................................................... 18 Figure 11: River bank slumping, erosion and extensive invasion of Chrysocorma spp in the Quthing River catchment. ................................................................................................................................... 20 Figure 12: P. quathlambae sampled below the Tsoelikane falls .......................................................... 21 Figure 13: The Sani River; note the erosion, river bank slumping and litter. ....................................... 22 Figure 14: The Mothae River; a road had been constructed across the river channel. ....................... 23 Figure 15: Sampling site on the lower Matsoku (JR22). ....................................................................... 23 Figure 16: Sampling site on the Senqu River; juvenile P. quathlambae from the Moremoholo River . 24 i List of Tables Table 1: Survey sites for the Mohale ESU, August 2017. (Shaded grey area indicates those sites surveyed in May 2017). ........................................................................................................................... 6 Table 2: Survey sites
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Katse Vaal Damtothe Damis777 Million M Africaregardlessto South Storage Ofthe V Inthe Dead Storage Reservoir Ofthe Bottom Levelisat1,989 Mandthe Isat1,895M
    KATSE DAM Lesotho NAMIBIA BOTSWANA COORDINATES (degrees, minutes, seconds) LATITUDE LONGITUDE Orange-Senqu 29° 20’ 11” S 28° 30’ 25” E River Basin Katse Dam LESOTHO LOCATION SOUTH AFRICA This dam is situated on the Malibamatso River, which is a tributary of the Senqu River. It is located in Lesotho (landlocked by South Africa) in quaternary catchment D11E. DESCRIPTION The dam is a double curvature concrete arch dam, 1,993 m above sea level. The intake tower is located approximately 18 km north of Katse Dam and has been designed to accommodate 70 m3/s, which was the maximum transfer envisaged for full implementation of the Lesotho Highlands Water Project (LHWP). Katse Dam is connected to the Muela Dam via a 45-km tunnel (Phase I of the LHWP, which was completed in 2005). Phase I of the project also consisted of a 31-km tunnel from the Mohale Reservoir to the Katse Dam. The Mohale–Katse Transfer Tunnel has a maximum capacity of 807.56 million m3/a. The dam has a full supply level of 2,053 m. The dead storage level is at 1,989 m and the bottom of the reservoir is at 1,895 m. PURPOSE Phase I of the LHWP, which was completed in 2005, included the construction of Katse Dam, with the intention of Katse Dam (source: www.jacquesleslie.com) augmenting South Africa’s water supply via a transfer to the Vaal River catchment, through an agreement between South Africa and Lesotho. The maximum long-term transfer volume is 877 million m3/a, and will be transferred to South Africa regardless of the storage in the Vaal or Orange catchments (ORASECOM, 2007a).
    [Show full text]
  • Country Profile – South Africa
    Country profile – South Africa Version 2016 Recommended citation: FAO. 2016. AQUASTAT Country Profile – South Africa. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Rome, Italy The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way. All requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial use rights should be made via www.fao.org/contact-us/licencerequest or addressed to [email protected]. FAO information products are available on the FAO website (www.fao.org/ publications) and can be purchased through [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Water Temperature on Aquatic Organisms: a Review of Knowledge and Methods for Assessing Biotic Responses to Temperature
    The effect of water temperature on aquatic organisms: a review of knowledge and methods for assessing biotic responses to temperature Report to the Water Research Commission by Helen Dallas The Freshwater Consulting Group Freshwater Research Unit Department of Zoology University of Cape Town WRC Report No. KV 213/09 30 28 26 24 22 C) o 20 18 16 14 Temperature ( 12 10 8 6 4 Jul '92 Jul Oct '91 Apr '92 Jun '92 Jan '93 Mar '92 Feb '92 Feb '93 Aug '91 Nov '91 Nov '91 Dec Aug '92 Sep '92 '92 Nov '92 Dec May '92 Sept '91 Month and Year i Obtainable from Water Research Commission Private Bag X03 GEZINA, 0031 [email protected] The publication of this report emanates from a project entitled: The effect of water temperature on aquatic organisms: A review of knowledge and methods for assessing biotic responses to temperature (WRC project no K8/690). DISCLAIMER This report has been reviewed by the Water Research Commission (WRC) and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the WRC, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use ISBN978-1-77005-731-9 Printed in the Republic of South Africa ii Preface This report comprises five deliverables for the one-year consultancy project to the Water Research Commission, entitled “The effect of water temperature on aquatic organisms – a review of knowledge and methods for assessing biotic responses to temperature” (K8-690). Deliverable 1 (Chapter 1) is a literature review aimed at consolidating available information pertaining to water temperature in aquatic ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • Jlb Smith Institute of Ichthyology
    ISSN 0075-2088 J.L.B. SMITH INSTITUTE OF ICHTHYOLOGY GRAHAMSTOWN, SOUTH AFRICA SPECIAL PUBLICATION No. 56 SCIENTIFIC AND COMMON NAMES OF SOUTHERN AFRICAN FRESHWATER FISHES by Paul H. Skelton November 1993 SERIAL PUBLICATIONS o f THE J.L.B. SMITH INSTITUTE OF ICHTHYOLOGY The Institute publishes original research on the systematics, zoogeography, ecology, biology and conservation of fishes. Manuscripts on ancillary subjects (aquaculture, fishery biology, historical ichthyology and archaeology pertaining to fishes) will be considered subject to the availability of publication funds. Two series are produced at irregular intervals: the Special Publication series and the Ichthyological Bulletin series. Acceptance of manuscripts for publication is subject to the approval of reviewers from outside the Institute. Priority is given to papers by staff of the Institute, but manuscripts from outside the Institute will be considered if they are pertinent to the work of the Institute. Colour illustrations can be printed at the expense of the author. Publications of the Institute are available by subscription or in exchange for publi­ cations of other institutions. Lists of the Institute’s publications are available from the Publications Secretary at the address below. INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS Manuscripts shorter than 30 pages will generally be published in the Special Publications series; longer papers will be considered for the Ichthyological Bulletin series. Please follow the layout and format of a recent Bulletin or Special Publication. Manuscripts must be submitted in duplicate to the Editor, J.L.B. Smith Institute of Ichthyology, Private Bag 1015, Grahamstown 6140, South Africa. The typescript must be double-spaced throughout with 25 mm margins all round.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lesotho Highlands Water Project and Sustainable Livelihoods Policy Implications for SADC
    BRIEFING NO 22 ● JUNE 2010 BRIEFINGG NR 2 APRIL 2008 The Lesotho Highlands Water Project and Sustainable Livelihoods Policy Implications for SADC Vusi Mashinini Dams have become an increasingly contested terrain in development discourse, prompting the United Nations (UN) to establish the World Commission on Dams (WCD) and adopt its Report in 2000. The bone of contention is whether dams promote or hinder sustainable development and livelihoods of the dam impacted areas and communities; and what needs to be done as mitigation of the dam impacts. This paper uses desktop methodology to explore the experiences of the Lesotho Highlands Water Project (LHWP) on sustainable livelihoods of its dam impacted areas and communi- ties, and suggests policy implications for sustainable development in the Southern African Development Community (SADC). The paper concludes that the project failed to promote sus- tainable livelihoods in the dam impacted areas and communities, and proposes that SADC member states should not only make dam policies but enforce them, in order to guarantee that dam impacted areas and communities have better livelihoods. Introduction fi nancial gain. This treaty and the LHWP, which it proposed, were to create profound economic, en- Shortly after conducting a coup d’etat in 1986, the vironmental, social and political ramifi cations in military government in Lesotho unilaterally signed Lesotho, and between Lesotho and South Africa. the Lesotho Highlands Water Treaty (LHWT) of Since its conception and inception, up until today, 1986 with the then apartheid ruled Republic of the LHWP has remained a controversial and heat- South Africa (RSA). Central to this treaty was the edly debated development project in Lesotho.1 agreement that Lesotho would sell water from On its part, the government of Lesotho has its mountain areas to the then RSA in return for relentlessly maintained that the LHWP is the key Vusi Mashinini is an Associate Professor in the Department of Geography and Environmental Science at the National University of Lesotho.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Existing Infrastructure in the Orange River Catchment
    Study Name: Orange River Integrated Water Resources Management Plan Report Title: Review of Existing Infrastructure in the Orange River Catchment Submitted By: WRP Consulting Engineers, Jeffares and Green, Sechaba Consulting, WCE Pty Ltd, Water Surveys Botswana (Pty) Ltd Authors: A Jeleni, H Mare Date of Issue: November 2007 Distribution: Botswana: DWA: 2 copies (Katai, Setloboko) Lesotho: Commissioner of Water: 2 copies (Ramosoeu, Nthathakane) Namibia: MAWRD: 2 copies (Amakali) South Africa: DWAF: 2 copies (Pyke, van Niekerk) GTZ: 2 copies (Vogel, Mpho) Reports: Review of Existing Infrastructure in the Orange River Catchment Review of Surface Hydrology in the Orange River Catchment Flood Management Evaluation of the Orange River Review of Groundwater Resources in the Orange River Catchment Environmental Considerations Pertaining to the Orange River Summary of Water Requirements from the Orange River Water Quality in the Orange River Demographic and Economic Activity in the four Orange Basin States Current Analytical Methods and Technical Capacity of the four Orange Basin States Institutional Structures in the four Orange Basin States Legislation and Legal Issues Surrounding the Orange River Catchment Summary Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 General ......................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Objective of the study ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • At the Intersection of Neoliberal Development, Scarce Resources, and Human Rights: Enforcing the Right to Water in South Africa Elizabeth A
    Macalester College DigitalCommons@Macalester College International Studies Honors Projects International Studies Department Spring 5-3-2010 At the intersection of neoliberal development, scarce resources, and human rights: Enforcing the right to water in South Africa Elizabeth A. Larson Macalester College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/intlstudies_honors Part of the African Studies Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, International Law Commons, Nature and Society Relations Commons, Political Economy Commons, and the Water Law Commons Recommended Citation Larson, Elizabeth A., "At the intersection of neoliberal development, scarce resources, and human rights: Enforcing the right to water in South Africa" (2010). International Studies Honors Projects. Paper 10. http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/intlstudies_honors/10 This Honors Project is brought to you for free and open access by the International Studies Department at DigitalCommons@Macalester College. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Studies Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Macalester College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. At the intersection of neoliberal development, scarce resources, and human rights: Enforcing the right to water in South Africa Elizabeth A. Larson Honors Thesis Advisor: Professor James von Geldern Department: International Studies Abstract The competing ideals of international human rights and global economic neoliberalism come into conflict when developing countries try to enforce socio- economic rights. This paper explores the intersection of economic globalization and the enforcement of 2 nd generation human rights. The focus of this exploration is the right to water in South Africa, specifically the recent Constitutional Court case Mazibuko v City of Johannesburg .
    [Show full text]
  • An Ecological Study on the Maluti Minnow (Pseudobarbus Quathlambae) in the Catchment Area of Phase Ib of the Lesotho Highland Water Scheme
    COPYRIGHT AND CITATION CONSIDERATIONS FOR THIS THESIS/ DISSERTATION o Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. o NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes. o ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. How to cite this thesis Surname, Initial(s). (2012) Title of the thesis or dissertation. PhD. (Chemistry)/ M.Sc. (Physics)/ M.A. (Philosophy)/M.Com. (Finance) etc. [Unpublished]: University of Johannesburg. Retrieved from: https://ujdigispace.uj.ac.za (Accessed: Date). BP.1t/ !JviiJvJv AN ECOLOGICAL STUDY ON THE MALUTI MINNOW (PSEUDOBARBUS QUATHLAMBAE) IN THE CATCHMENT AREA OF PHASE IB OF THE LESOTHO HIGHLAND WATER SCHEME BY JOHANNESLAMBERTUSRALL THESIS SUBMIITED IN FULFILMENT OF THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN ZOOLOGY IN TIlE FACULTY OF SCIENCE AT THE RAND AFRIKAANS UNIVERSITY SUPERVISOR: DR. GJ. STEYN CO-SUPERVISOR: PROF. H.H. DU PREEZ CO·SUPERVISOR: DR. M. l\lAEMA NOVEMBER 1993 Aan my liefdevolle ouers Psalm 121: "Ek slaan my oe op na die berge: waar sal my hulp vandaan kom?" ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS * I would like to express my sincere appreciation towards my supervisors, Dr. GJ. Steyn, Professor Hein H. Du Preez and Dr. M. Maema for support, guidance, encouragement, their professional commitment to conservation and their acknowledgment of the importance of individualism. * We are indebted to our sponsors, Lesotho Highlands Development Authority, Mazda Wildlife Fund, ENGEN, and Endangered Wildlife Trust.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Lesotho's Mohale
    African Study Monographs, 31(2): 57-106, July 2010 57 WHO DRIVES RESETTLEMENT? THE CASE OF LESOTHO’S MOHALE DAM Paul DEVITT Hunting-Consult 4 Joint Venture Robert K. HITCHCOCK Department of Geography, Michigan State University ABSTRACT The Lesotho Highlands Water Project, a joint development effort of the governments of Lesotho and South Africa, involved the construction of several large dams and other infrastructure such as roads, bridges, and power lines. The purpose of the dam and water transfer project was to provide water to the Gauteng region of South Africa and electricity to Lesotho. Phase 1B of the project, the Mohale Dam, resulted in the displacement of over 320 households and the inundation of villages, fi elds, and grazing lands. In line with the 1986 Treaty between the governments of Lesotho and South Africa, the project authorities provided compensation for losses suffered and put in place development projects in an effort to promote economic self-suffi ciency. This article assesses the degree to which project-affected people in the Lesotho highlands were actively engaged in planning and decision-making regarding their own resettlement and rehabilitation, and the extent to which public participation contributed to their subsequent welfare. Key Words: Lesotho; Dam project; Resettlement; Compensation; Development; Participation. INTRODUCTION Most large dams are built to provide power or water to people other than those who have to make the sacrifi ces necessary for the dams to be built. The people who lose their land and perhaps their homes, their communities, their jobs, the graves of their ancestors, and the abodes of their spirits seldom enjoy the benefi ts, and suffer many of the inconveniences, of these projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Fosaf Proceedings of the 13Th Yellowfish Working
    1 FOSAF THE FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN AFRICAN FLYFISHERS PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH YELLOWFISH WORKING GROUP CONFERENCE STERKFONTEIN DAM, HARRISMITH 06 – 08 MARCH 2009 Edited by Peter Arderne PRINTING SPONSORED BY: 13th Yellowfish Working Group Conference 2 CONTENTS Page Participants 3 Chairman’s Opening Address – Peter Mills 4 Water volumes of SA dams: A global perspective – Louis De Wet 6 The Strontium Isotope distribution in Water & Fish – Wikus Jordaan 13 Overview of the Mine Drainage Impacts in the West Rand Goldfield – Mariette 16 Liefferink Adopt-a-River Programme: Development of an implementation plan – Ramogale 25 Sekwele Report on the Genetic Study of small scaled yellowfishes – Paulette Bloomer 26 The Biology of Smallmouth & Largemouth yellowfish in Lake Gariep – Bruce Ellender 29 & Olaf Weyl Likely response of Smallmouth yellowfish populations to fisheries development – Olaf 33 Weyl Early Development of Vaal River Smallmouth Yellowfish - Daksha Naran 36 Body shape changes & accompanying habitat shifts: observations in life cycle of 48 Labeobarbus marequensis in the Luvuvhu River – Paul Fouche Alien Fish Eradication in the Cape rivers: Progress with the EIA – Dean Impson 65 Yellowfish Telemetry: Update on the existing study – Gordon O’Brien 67 Bushveld Smallscale yellowfish (Labeobarbus polylepis): Aspects of the Ecology & 68 Population Mananagement– Gordon O’Brien Protected River Ecosystems Study: Bloubankspruit, Skeerpoort & Magalies River & 71 Elands River (Mpumalanga) – Hylton Lewis & Gordon O’Brien Legislative review: Critical
    [Show full text]
  • Findings from the Senegal River Basin, the Columbia River Basin, and the Lesotho Highlands Water Project
    Report no. 46456 Africa Region Water Resources Unit Working Paper 1 Benefit Sharing in International Rivers: Public Disclosure Authorized Findings from the Senegal River Basin, the Columbia River Basin, and the Lesotho Highlands Water Project Public Disclosure Authorized November 12, 2008 Public Disclosure Authorized Final Version Winston H. YU The World Bank, Africa Region Sustainable Development Department Public Disclosure Authorized 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acronyms Acknowledgments Executive Summary I. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 8 Literature Review........................................................................................................ 10 Methodology and Objective ...................................................................................... 11 II. Senegal River Basin ................................................................................................. 12 A. Introduction ........................................................................................................... 12 B. Project Objectives and Description..................................................................... 15 C. Quantifying Economic Benefits and Costs ........................................................ 17 D. Actual Benefits and Costs .................................................................................... 20 E. An Evolving Senegal River .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • YWG Conference Proceedings 2014
    FOSAF PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18 TH YELLOWFISH WORKING GROUP CONFERENCE BLACK MOUNTAIN HOTEL, THABA ´NCHU, FREE STATE PROVINCE Image courtesy of Carl Nicholson EDITED BY PETER ARDERNE 1 18 th Yellowfish Working Group Conference CONTENTS Page Participants 3 Opening address – Peter Mills 4 State of the rivers of the Kruger National Park – Robin Petersen 6 A fish kill protocol for South Africa – Byron Grant 10 Phylogeographic structure in the KwaZulu-Natal yellowfish – Connor Stobie 11 Restoration of native fishes in the lower Rondegat River after alien fish eradication: 15 an overview of a successful conservation intervention.- Darragh Woodford Yellowfish behavioural work in South Africa: past, present and future research – 19 Gordon O’Brien The occurrence and distribution of yellowfish in state dams in the Free State. – Leon 23 Barkhuizen; J.G van As 2 & O.L.F Weyl 3 Yellowfish and Chiselmouths: Biodiversity Research and its conservation 24 implications - Emmanuel Vreven Should people be eating fish from the Olifants River, Limpopo Province? 25 – Sean Marr A review of the research findings on the Xikundu Fishway & the implications for 36 fishways in the future – Paul Fouche´ Report on the Vanderkloof Dam- Francois Fouche´ 48 Karoo Seekoei River Nature Reserve – P C Ferreira 50 Departmental report: Biomonitoring in the lower Orange River within the borders 54 of the Northern Cape Province – Peter Ramollo Free State Report – Leon Barkhuizen 65 Limpopo Report – Paul Fouche´ 68 Conference summary – Peter Mills 70 Discussion & Comment following
    [Show full text]