Cruelty to Dogs

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cruelty to Dogs Chapter 2 ‘The Children’s Hour’: Cruelty to dogs The priest had a dog. And he loved it. It ate a piece of meat. He killed it. – Russian nursery rhyme The title of this chapter alludes to the Hollywood film ‘The Children’s Hour’ (1961) based on the 1934 play by Lillian Hellman who in turn wrote it around a real life event in Scotland.1 Produced after the end of the 1950s, a decade closely orientated to family values, this film over- turned the perception of children as innocent creatures in matters of human sexuality. It shows pre-teen girls in a private boarding school orchestrating a major intrigue against their two schoolmistresses by accusing them of having a lesbian relationship. The well-read girls observe and collect pieces of evidence that lead them to conclude that the schoolmistresses have romantic leanings towards one another. This launches a series of events that lead to an innocent woman’s sui- cide. The title of the film encapsulates the double irony of children’s ability to penetrate the secrets of sexual attraction and to plot a major intrigue. The film also challenges adult naïveté, prompting its viewers to reconsider their assumptions of childhood innocence. This chapter examines stories from the Russian literary canon that educate adults on the subject of children’s wickedness through the narratalogical use of a dog. Most of these stories are not written for children; in some of those cases when they did become part of juvenil- ia this happened by default. The texts chosen for analysis in this chap- ter include episodes that contain manifestations of the sadistic or unkind treatment of dogs by children. Some relate to children’s sexu- ality through contacts with dogs and other animals. Others reveal in- 1 The Children’s Hour. Dir. William Wyler, screenplay John M. Hayes, USA, 1961. 80 Political Animals stances of extreme cruelty: in Dostoevsky’s The Brothers Karamazov a boy feeds a hungry street dog with bread into which he has put a pin;2 Anton Chekhov in his short story ‘Kashtanka’ (1887) describes a boy who tortures a female dog by feeding it a piece of meat that is attached to a string which he then pulls out of its stomach.3 Alexander Kuprin’s (1870-1938) ‘The White Poodle’ (1908) draws our attention to class differentiation amongst children in the story of a spoilt rich boy selfishly possessive of the working dog belonging to a working boy. Although the rich boy does not torture the dog physically, his unkind nature makes the dog suffer. In ‘The Elephant’ (1907), Kuprin enters into the world of a child’s unconscious, the world defined by Freud as a child’s ‘sexual life’.4 Behavioural psychologists note that the majority of children who abuse insects or small pets do so as part of the process of learning about the world: how the spider is put together, what separate parts of an insect will do if not connected to the whole; whether a bird can fly if a wing is torn off, and so on.5 Data on criminal adults, however, suggest that a significant number of killers abused pets in their child- hood. Russian literature, in the case of the authors analysed in this chapter, has produced motifs that recognise these behavioural patterns and drives in children. In The Brothers Karamazov children learn about the world by observing dogs’ sexual behaviour: this is regarded as part of the ‘normal’ learning process. Yet, in the same novel and in Chekhov’s story ‘Kashtanka’, children abuse dogs in a way that can be classified as zoo-sadism. These texts are thus directed at adults to alert them to children’s potential sadistic inclinations and to promote a more realistic psychology-based attitude towards children. At the end of this chapter I analyse a little-known collection of children’s stories about dogs: Sobaka: rasskazy o sobakakh (The Dog: Stories about Dogs, 1883) as an example of an educational counter-narrative to the 2 F.M. Dostoevskii, Brat’ia Karamazovy, Polnoe sobranie sochinenii v tridtsati tomakh. Leningrad: izd-vo Nauka, Vols. XIV and XV, 1976. 3 A.P. Chekhov, “Kashtanka”, in Sobranie sochinenii v dvenadtsati tomakh. Mos- cow: izd-vo Khudozhestvennaia literatura, 1955, Vol. V, 452-472. 4 Sigmund Freud, “The Archaic Features and Infantilism of Dreams”, in Introduc- tory Lectures on Psychoanalysis. Trans. James and Alix Strachey, The Penguin Freud Library, London: Penguin Books, 1991, Vol. I, 235-250. 5 Arnold Arluke, Just a Dog: Understanding Animal Cruelty and Ourselves. Phila- delphia: Temple UP, 2006. .
Recommended publications
  • The Aesthetic Terrain of Settler Colonialism: Katherine Mansfield and Anton Chekhov’S Natives
    Journal of Postcolonial Writing ISSN: 1744-9855 (Print) 1744-9863 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rjpw20 The aesthetic terrain of settler colonialism: Katherine Mansfield and Anton Chekhov’s natives Rebecca Ruth Gould To cite this article: Rebecca Ruth Gould (2018): The aesthetic terrain of settler colonialism: Katherine Mansfield and Anton Chekhov’s natives, Journal of Postcolonial Writing, DOI: 10.1080/17449855.2018.1511242 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/17449855.2018.1511242 Published online: 04 Oct 2018. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 1 View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rjpw20 JOURNAL OF POSTCOLONIAL WRITING https://doi.org/10.1080/17449855.2018.1511242 The aesthetic terrain of settler colonialism: Katherine Mansfield and Anton Chekhov’snatives Rebecca Ruth Gould College of Arts and Law, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK ABSTRACT KEYWORDS While Anton Chekhov’sinfluence on Katherine Mansfield is Settler colonialism; Sakhalin; widely acknowledged, the two writers’ settler colonial aesthetics New Zealand; Siberia; Maori; have not been brought into systematic comparison. Yet Gilyak; Russian Empire Chekhov’s chronicle of Sakhalin Island in the Russian Far East parallels in important ways Mansfield’s near-contemporaneous account of colonial life in New Zealand. Both writers are con- cerned with a specific variant of the colonial situation: settler colonialism, which prioritizes appropriation of land over the gov- ernance of peoples. This article considers the aesthetic strategies each writer develops for capturing that milieu within the frame- work of the settler colonial aesthetics that has guided much anthropological engagement with endangered peoples.
    [Show full text]
  • Title Link – Story in English Link – Story in Russian Link – Other
    לק"י Title Link – story in English Link – story in Russian Link – other http://chekhov2.tripod.com/035.htm http://bibliotekar.ru/rusChehov/71.ht http://www.gutenberg.org/files/1732/1732-h/1732- m h.htm#link2H_4_0006 In a Strange Land http://www.online- http://chehov.niv.ru/chehov/text/na- literature.com/anton_chekhov/1136/ chuzhbine.htm http://www.online-literature.com/donne/1136/ http://chekhov2.tripod.com/023.htm http://chehov.niv.ru/chehov/text/v- In an Hotel http://www.online- nomerah.htm literature.com/anton_chekhov/1124/ http://www.online- literature.com/anton_chekhov/1264/ http://chehov.niv.ru/chehov/text/v- In Exile http://chekhov2.tripod.com/164.htm ssylke.htm http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/In_Exile http://www.lib.ru/LITRA/CHEHOW/r_c http://chekhov2.tripod.com/113.htm h_week.txt In Passion Week http://www.online- http://chehov.niv.ru/chehov/text/na- literature.com/anton_chekhov/1214/ strastnoj-nedele.htm http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/In_Passion_Week http://chehov.niv.ru/chehov/text/vesn oj.htm http://chehov.niv.ru/chehov/text/vesn In spring oj_1.htm http://www.lib.ru/LITRA/CHEHOW/ves na.txt http://www.lib.ru/LITRA/CHEHOW/vag In the Carriage / In the Wagon on.txt http://chekhov2.tripod.com/129.htm http://www.gutenberg.org/files/1732/1732-h/1732- http://chehov.niv.ru/chehov/text/v- In the Coach - House h.htm#link2H_4_0015 sarae.htm http://www.online- literature.com/anton_chekhov/1230/ http://www.online- http://chehov.niv.ru/chehov/text/v- In the Court literature.com/anton_chekhov/1186/ sude.htm http://chekhov2.tripod.com/085.htm
    [Show full text]
  • Theatre and the Family: Anton Chekhov, 'The Cherry Orchard' Transcript
    Theatre and The Family: Anton Chekhov, 'The Cherry Orchard' Transcript Date: Tuesday, 23 February 2016 - 6:00PM Location: Museum of London 23 February 2016 Theatre and The Family: Anton Chekhov, The Cherry Orchard Professor Belinda Jack Music – Tchaikovsky - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ABGZhFsXYI; Four Seasons, April/Spring (Vladimir Ashkenazy) Good evening and welcome – and thank you for coming. Particularly good to see some familiar faces from previous lectures and particularly my last lecture on Ibsen's A Doll's House as this evening's lecture is something of a companion piece. This extraordinary play poses two particularly intriguing questions. The first is this: how does it hold our attention given the limited amount of action? And the second: is it really a comedy as the playwright himself insisted it was? Jean-Louis Barrault, the French actor and director, summarizes the action of The Cherry Orchard in the following way: 'In Act One, the cherry orchard is in danger of being sold, in Act Two it is on the verge of being sold, in Act Three it is sold, and in Act Four it has been sold' (Laurence Senelick Anton Chekhov, 1985, 124-25) Thus described the play seems devoid of dramatic action. The felling of the Orchard, which is arguably the dramatic climax of the play, takes place off-stage. We only hear the axe as it meets the trunk of the first cherry tree. How could the scenario described by Barrault be construed as 'comic'? Many of you will know the play but in case some of you do not, this is a slightly fuller description than Barrault's.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Chekhov and His Approach to Acting in Contemporary Performance Training Richard Solomon
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fogler Library 5-2002 Michael Chekhov and His Approach to Acting in Contemporary Performance Training Richard Solomon Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd Part of the Performance Studies Commons Recommended Citation Solomon, Richard, "Michael Chekhov and His Approach to Acting in Contemporary Performance Training" (2002). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 615. http://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/615 This Open-Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. MICHAEL CHEKHOV AND HIS APPROACH TO ACTING IN CONTEMPORARY PERFORMANCE TRAINING by Richard Solomon B.A. University of Southern Maine, 1983 A THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts (in Theatre) The Graduate School The University of Maine May, 2002 Advisory Committee: Tom Mikotowicz, Associate Professor of Theatre, Advisor Jane Snider, Associate Professor of Theatre Sandra Hardy, Associate Professor of Theatre MICaAEL CHEKHOV AND HIS APPROACH TO ACTING IN CONTEMPORARY PERFORMANCE TRAINING By Richard Solomon Thesis ~dhsor:Dr. Tom Mikotowicz An Abstract of the Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts (in Theatre) May, 2002 Michael Chekhov was an actor, diuector, and teacher who was determined to develop a clear and accessible acting approach. During his lifetime, his ideas were often viewed as too radical and mystical. Over the past decade however, the Chekhov method of actor training has enjoyed an expansion of interest.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cherry Orchard
    The Milwaukee Repertory Theater Presents THE CHERRY ORCHARD BY ANTON CHEKHOV APRIL 17 - MAY 10, 2009 A STUDY GUIDE FOR STUDENTS AND EDUCATORS This study guide is researched and designed by the Education Department at the Milwaukee Repertory Theater and is intended to prepare you for your visit. It contains information that will deepen your understanding of, and appreciation for, the production. We‟ve also included questions and activities for you to explore before and after our performance of THE CHERRY ORCHARD Study Guide Inside This Guide If you would like to schedule a Created By classroom workshop, or if we can Janine Bannier, Synopsis/About the help in any other way, please contact: 2 Education Intern Author and Jenny Kostreva at (414) 290-5370 Historical Context 3 Rebecca Witt, [email protected] Education Who’s Who 4 Coordinator Rebecca Witt at (414) 290-5393 [email protected] An Interview with 5 Edited By Ben Barnes Jenny Kostreva, Education Director Glossary of Terms/ 6 Kristin Crouch, Themes Literary Director Visiting The Rep 8 Page 2 Synopsis THE CHERRY ORCHARD is the story of Madame Ranevskaya, her family and their cherry orchard estate in Russia. The play opens in May, with everyone awaiting the return of Madame Ranevskaya and her daughter Anya from Paris. When they arrive there is much talk of love and happiness between the family members. Unfortunately, the homecoming is not completely happy. Madame Ranevskaya is now in debt and neither she nor her brother, Gayev, have money to pay the mortgage on the estate. If they are unable to pay for the estate by August, it will be auctioned off.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Conflict in a Misfortune by Anton Chekhov
    Vol. 19 No. 1, 2021 ISSN (online): 2746-4652 Available online at https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/index.php/jwacana/index doi: https://doi.org/10.33369/jwacana.v19i1.6578 ANALYSIS OF CONFLICT IN A MISFORTUNE BY ANTON CHEKHOV Dwi Uswatun Khasanah University of Muhammadiyah Bengkulu Email: [email protected] Abstract This paper aims to find the conflict that exists in the story of A Misfortune by Anton Chekhov. This research method is descriptive analytical research methods. The data collection technique of this study uses documentary techniques sourced from the stories of A Misfortune by Anton Chekhov. The conflict found by researchers in the form of sentences, phrases and word quotations. Based on the analysis carried out, the researchers also found two types of conflicts, namely people vs. self and people vs. people. The first, the main character who has a conflict with himself such as feelings of doubt, confusion, anger, chaos, sadness, despair, shock, fear, regret, revenge, and annoyance. Second, the main character has problem with other character figures such as quarrels, debates, disagreements, and disputes. Keyword: conflict, type conflict Abstrak Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menemukan konflik yang ada dalam cerita A Misfortune karya Anton Chekhov. Metode penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian deskriptif-analitis. Teknik pengumpulan data penelitian ini menggunakan teknik dokumenter yang bersumber dari cerita A Misfortune karya Anton Chekhov. Konflik yang ditemukan peneliti berupa kalimat, frasa dan kutipan kata. Berdasarkan analisis yang dilakukan, peneliti juga menemukan dua jenis konflik yaitu people vs self dan people vs people. Pertama, tokoh utama memiliki konflik dengan dirinya sendiri seperti perasaan ragu, bingung, marah, kacau, sedih, putus asa, kaget, takut, menyesal, dendam, dan jengkel.
    [Show full text]
  • A Graph-Based Analysis of Anton Chekhov's Uncle Vanya
    Journal of Humanistic Mathematics Volume 9 | Issue 2 July 2019 A Graph-Based Analysis of Anton Chekhov’s Uncle Vanya Stanislaw Zawislak University of Bielsko-Biala Jerzy Kopeć University of Bielsko-Biała Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.claremont.edu/jhm Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons, and the Mathematics Commons Recommended Citation Zawislak, S. and Kopeć, J. "A Graph-Based Analysis of Anton Chekhov’s Uncle Vanya," Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, Volume 9 Issue 2 (July 2019), pages 157-186. DOI: 10.5642/ jhummath.201902.11 . Available at: https://scholarship.claremont.edu/jhm/vol9/iss2/11 ©2019 by the authors. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License. JHM is an open access bi-annual journal sponsored by the Claremont Center for the Mathematical Sciences and published by the Claremont Colleges Library | ISSN 2159-8118 | http://scholarship.claremont.edu/jhm/ The editorial staff of JHM works hard to make sure the scholarship disseminated in JHM is accurate and upholds professional ethical guidelines. However the views and opinions expressed in each published manuscript belong exclusively to the individual contributor(s). The publisher and the editors do not endorse or accept responsibility for them. See https://scholarship.claremont.edu/jhm/policies.html for more information. A Graph-Based Analysis of Anton Chekhov’s Uncle Vanya Stanisław Zawiślak Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Bielsko-Biała, POLAND [email protected] Jerzy Kopeć Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Bielsko-Biała, POLAND [email protected] Synopsis We analyze the famous Anton Chekhov play Uncle Vanya by means of graph theory.
    [Show full text]
  • A Few Words About Chekhov (Texts)
    A Few Words about Chekhov (Texts) Olga and Anton, 1901 I. Duo (Olga Knipper) (Anton Chekhov) We met in 1898 at one of the Moscow We met in 1898 at one of the Moscow Art Theatre’s early rehearsals of The Sea-Gull. Art Theatre’s early rehearsals of The Sea Gull. We actors were filled with immense excitement at this first meeting with Anton Pavlovich, the author beloved by us all. An actor asked me to discuss the character of the author in The Sea-Gull. I How exhilarating it was to feel in that replied, “Why, he wears check trousers!” dark, empty theatre that he who was our ‘soul’ sat listening. Another actor wanted to know what one was to make of a certain role. I answered, “The best you can.” We did not know how to take his words- in jest or in earnest. He looked at us, sometimes with a smile, sometimes with the utmost gravity, pinching his beard, twirling his pince-nez by its cord. Ah, but Olga Knipper, she was magnificent. Voice, dignity, earnestness – her acting was so good it brought a lump into my throat. Had I stayed in Moscow, I should surely have asked her to marry me! II. Solo (Olga) III. Solo (Anton) On the 25th of May we were married. It’s the devil who has put this bacillus into me From then on, we were constantly parting, and the love of art into you, Olga! Always seeing each other off, Always having to say ‘goodbye.’ Yalta November 12th Though his heart was drawn to Moscow, For his health we had to live in Yalta— We are having glorious weather for November, His ‘warm Siberia,’ he called it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chekhovian Intertext Dialogue with a Classic
    The Chekhovian Intertext Dialogue with a Classic n LYUDM il A P A R T S THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY PREss • COLUMBus Copyright © 2008 by The Ohio State University. All rights reserved. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Parts, Lyudmila. The Chekhovian intertext : dialogue with a classic / Lyudmila Parts.—1st ed. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978–0–8142–1083–3 (cloth : alk. paper)—ISBN 978–0–8142–9162–7 (CD- ROM) 1. Chekhov, Anton Pavlovich, 1860–1904—Influence. 2. Chekhov, Anton Pavlovich, 1860–1904—Criticism and interpretation. 3. Russian literature—20th century—History and criticism. 4. Russian literature—21st century—History and criticism. 5. Russia (Federation)—Intellectual life—1991– 6. Russia (Fed- eration)—Civilization—21st century. I. Title. PG3458.Z8P37 2008 891.72’3—dc22 2007045611 This book is available in the following editions: Cloth (ISBN 978–0–8142–1083–3) CD-ROM (ISBN 978–0–8142–9162–7) The author expresses appreciation to the University Seminars at Columbia Uni- versity for their help in publication. Material in this work was presented to the University Seminar: Slavic History and Culture. Studies of the Harriman Institute Columbia University The Harriman Institute, Columbia University, sponsors the Studies of the Harri- man Institute in the belief that their publication contributes to scholarly research and public understanding. In this way the Institute, while not necessarily endors- ing their conclusions, is pleased to make available the results of some of the research conducted under its auspices. Cover design by Jenny Poff Text design by Juliet Williams Type set in Adobe Palatino Printed by Thomson-Shore, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Osher Lifelong Learning Institute Course Syllabus
    Osher Lifelong Learning Institute Course Syllabus Instructor Name: Caroline Smadja Email: [email protected] Course Title and Description: European Masters of the Short Story We’ll focus this time on European masters of the short story. As with the previous classes I designed for OLLI, women and men writers will be equally represented. We’ll begin the class with “A Misfortune” by Russian Anton Chekhov, hailed the greatest short- story writer of all times and credited by many contemporary writers, Tobias Wolff not the least of them, for being a main source of inspiration. Next, we’ll read Danish author Karen Blixen’s “Babette’s Feast,” which was made into a wonderful movie in 1987. Like many women of the 19th and 20th centuries, Blixen often wrote under a male pen name (Isak Dinesen) Irish writer James Joyce’s “A Little Cloud” will be the focus of Week 3. We’ll then discuss Anais Nin’s “The Mouse.” Nin, famous for her diaries, began to write in her native Spanish, then switched to English once she moved to NYC. On Week V, we’ll read a short story by famous Italian author, Italo Calvino. French writer Colette, the first woman of letters to be given a state funeral, will conclude this class with her story “Armande.” Each week will center on one specific story. In order to foster as lively and candid an exchange as possible, each session will first involve a group discussion based on study questions handed out one week in advance. Participants will be asked to analyze the story in terms of style, themes, point of view, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • What More Can We Know About Chekhov?
    80 | 81 What more can we know about Chekhov? CHEKHOVS WORK If we thirst to know more about Chekhov than, say, Donald Rayfield about Tolstoy, one of the reasons is that he wrote relati• vely so little. True, his collected works (not counting let• ters) amount to some eighteen volumes, but if we sub• tract from them all the juvenilia (most of which requi• res a lot of hindsight to see as the work of a budding genius), we are left with a body of work that will fit quite comfortably into one volume. Like most writers, Chekhov achieves classic status only when he is sufficiently well-off (or well-paid) to write only what he wants to write. He reached that stage in 1888 not long before his thirtieth birthday, after the public acknowledgement of Steppe. If we con• sider that Chekhov was virtually lost to literature for 1890, the year of his trek to Sakhalin, and that his health collapses in spring 1897» Chekhov's prime is a mere seven years, little longer than Lermontov's. True, three of the major four plays The Seagull, Uncle Vanya, Three Sisters, The Cherry Orchard and half a dozen of his greatest stories from Lady with Dog to The Bride are yet to be written, but Chekhov averaged just one page of print a week for his last seven years. Thus his chief occupation between 1897 and 1904 was not writing but dying. The problems of Chekhov's reception lie not in any flaw in his work, not in any difficulty in interpreting it (however perverse some theatre directors and critics are).
    [Show full text]
  • Anton Chekhov "The Bet" It Was a Dark Autumn Night
    Anton Chekhov "The Bet" It was a dark autumn night. The old banker was walking up and down his study and remembering how, fifteen years before, he had given a party one autumn evening. There had been many clever men there, and there had been interesting conversations. Among other things they had talked of capital punishment. The majority of the guests, among whom were many journalists and intellectual men, disapproved of the death penalty. They considered that form of punishment out of date, immoral, and unsuitable for Christian States. In the opinion of some of them the death penalty ought to be replaced everywhere by imprisonment for life. "I don't agree with you," said their host the banker. "I have not tried either the death penalty or imprisonment for life, but if one may judge a priori, the death penalty is more moral and more humane than imprisonment for life. Capital punishment kills a man at once, but lifelong imprisonment kills him slowly. Which executioner is the more humane, he who kills you in a few minutes or he who drags the life out of you in the course of many years?" "Both are equally immoral," observed one of the guests, "for they both have the same object - to take away life. The State is not God. It has not the right to take away what it cannot restore when it wants to." Among the guests was a young lawyer, a young man of five- and-twenty. When he was asked his opinion, he said: "The death sentence and the life sentence are equally immoral, but if I had to choose between the death penalty and imprisonment for life, I would certainly choose the second.
    [Show full text]