Molecular Blueprints for Antitumor Drugs
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Polylactic Acid Microspheres Containing Acla
[CANCER RESEARCH 49. 4357-4362, August 1. 1989] Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Polylactic Acid Microspheres Containing Aclarubicin Hydrochloride 1omonimi Ichihara,1 Kiyoshi Sakamoto, Katsutaka Mori, and Masanobu Akagi Department of Surgery II, Kumamoto University Medical School, Kumamoto 860, Japan 4BSTRACT MATERIALS AND METHODS Transcatheter arterial Chemoembolization therapy using polylactic Preparation of PLA-ACRms acid microspheres containing aclarubicin hydrochloride (ACR) was per PLA-ACRms were prepared in the pharmacy of the Kumamoto formed in 62 patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma. These microspheres were about 200 ¡anin diameter and contained 10% (w/w) University Hospital. Briefly, aclarubicin hydrochloride and isopropyl aclarubicin. A single dose of polylactic acid microspheres containing ACR myristate, a medium-chain fatty acid ester, were dissolved in 7.5% (50-100 mg of ACR) was administered 1 to 8 times with a mean of 2.2 polylactic acid-methylene chloride. The resultant solution was dispersed in 1% gelatin solution and sterilized in an autoclave for 20 min at doses (a total of 160 treatments) in 62 patients. Antitumor effects were 120°C;thismixture was then stirred with a magnetic stirrer at 500 rpm observed from the decrease in serum a-fetoprotein levels (82.1% of the patients) and in two dimensional size of tumor on computed tomography for 1 h. The resultant microspheres were collected by filtration through (93.6%). The cumulative survival rate was 54.3% at 1 year, 24.6% at 2 a membrane filter (3 //m pore diameter), rinsed 2 to 3 times (in 1 liter years, and 19.2% at 3 years, respectively, among 59 patients with of distilled water), and dried under reduced pressure for 5 days. -
PEMD-91-12BR Off-Label Drugs: Initial Results of a National Survey
11 1; -- __...._-----. ^.-- ______ -..._._ _.__ - _........ - t Ji Jo United States General Accounting Office Washington, D.C. 20648 Program Evaluation and Methodology Division B-242851 February 25,199l The Honorable Edward M. Kennedy Chairman, Committee on Labor and Human Resources United States Senate Dear Mr. Chairman: In September 1989, you asked us to conduct a study on reimbursement denials by health insurers for off-label drug use. As you know, the Food and Drug Administration designates the specific clinical indications for which a drug has been proven effective on a label insert for each approved drug, “Off-label” drug use occurs when physicians prescribe a drug for clinical indications other than those listed on the label. In response to your request, we surveyed a nationally representative sample of oncologists to determine: . the prevalence of off-label use of anticancer drugs by oncologists and how use varies by clinical, demographic, and geographic factors; l the extent to which third-party payers (for example, Medicare intermediaries, private health insurers) are denying payment for such use; and l whether the policies of third-party payers are influencing the treatment of cancer patients. We randomly selected 1,470 members of the American Society of Clinical Oncologists and sent them our survey in March 1990. The sam- pling was structured to ensure that our results would be generalizable both to the nation and to the 11 states with the largest number of oncologists. Our response rate was 56 percent, and a comparison of respondents to nonrespondents shows no noteworthy differences between the two groups. -
A Phase II Study of Paclitaxel and Capecitabine As a First-Line Combination Chemotherapy for Advanced Gastric Cancer
British Journal of Cancer (2008) 98, 316 – 322 & 2008 Cancer Research UK All rights reserved 0007 – 0920/08 $30.00 www.bjcancer.com A phase II study of paclitaxel and capecitabine as a first-line combination chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer Clinical Studies HJ Kang1, HM Chang1, TW Kim1, M-H Ryu1, H-J Sohn1, JH Yook2,STOh2, BS Kim2, J-S Lee1 and Y-K Kang*,1 1 2 Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea Paclitaxel and capecitabine, which have distinct mechanisms of action and toxicity profiles, have each shown high activity as single agents in gastric cancer. Synergistic interaction between these two drugs was suggested by taxane-induced upregulation of thymidine phosphorylase. We, therefore, evaluated the antitumour activity and toxicities of paclitaxel and capecitabine as first-line therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Patients with histologically confirmed unresectable or metastatic AGC were treated À2 À2 with capecitabine 825 mg m p.o. twice daily on days 1–14 and paclitaxel 175 mg m i.v. on day 1 every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. Between June 2002 and May 2004, 45 patients, of median age 57 years (range ¼ 38–73 years), were treated with the combination of capecitabine and paclitaxel. After a median 6 cycles (range ¼ 1–9 cycles) of chemotherapy, 43 were evaluable for toxicity and response. A total of 2 patients showed complete response and 20 showed partial response making the overall response rate 48.9% (95% CI ¼ 30.3–63.5%). -
In Vivo Evaluation of Ixabepilone (BMS247550), a Novel Epothilone B Derivative, Against Pediatric Cancer Models Jennifer K
Cancer Therapy: Preclinical In vivo Evaluation of Ixabepilone (BMS247550), A Novel Epothilone B Derivative, against Pediatric Cancer Models Jennifer K. Peterson,1Chandra Tucker,1Edward Favours,1PamelaJ. Cheshire,1Jeremy Creech,1 Catherine A. Billups,2 Richard Smykla,3 Francis Y.F. Lee,3 and Peter J. Houghton1 Abstract Purpose:Vinca alkaloids, agents that cause depolymerization of microtubules, are highly active in treatment of many pediatric cancers. In contrast, taxanes, agents that stabilize microtubules, are far less effective against the same cancer types.The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the antitumor activity of ixabepilone, an epothilone B derivative representing a new class of microtubule-stabilizing antimitotic agent in a wide variety of pediatric solid tumor models. Experimental Design: Ixabepilone was administered i.v. every 4 days for three doses to scid mice bearing s.c. human rhabdomyosarcoma (three lines), neuroblastoma (four),Wilms’ tumors (six), osteosarcoma (four), or brain tumors (seven).Tumor diameters were measured weekly, and tumor growth or regressions were determined. Pharmacokinetic studies were done following a single administration of drug at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) level (10 mg/kg). Results: At the MTD (10 mg/kg), ixabepilone induced objective responses (all tumors in a group achieved z50% volume regression) in three of three rhabdomyosarcoma lines, three of five neuroblastomas, six of seven Wilms’ tumor models, two of six osteosarcoma, and four of eight brain tumor models. However, the dose-response curve was steep with only 2 of 19 tumors models regressing (z50%) at 4.4 mg/kg. In comparison, paclitaxel administered at the MTD on the same schedule failed to induce objective regressions of three tumor lines that were highly sensitive to treatment with ixabepilone. -
2701.Full-Text.Pdf
Cancer Therapy: Clinical The Effect of Ketoconazole on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Ixabepilone: A First in Class Epothilone B Analogue in Late-Phase Clinical Development Sanjay Goel,1Marvin Cohen,4 S. Nilgu« n C¸ o« mezoglu,4 Lionel Perrin,5 Franc¸ois Andre¤ ,5 DavidJayabalan, 1Lisa Iacono,4 Adriana Comprelli,4 Van T. Ly,4 Donglu Zhang,4 Carrie Xu,4 W. Griffith Humphreys,4 Hayley McDaid,1, 2 Gary Goldberg,1, 3 Susan B. Horwitz,1, 2 andSridhar Mani 1 Abstract Purpose:To determine if ixabepilone is a substrate for cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) and if its metabolism by this cytochrome is clinically important, we did a clinical drug interaction study in humans using ketoconazole as an inhibitor of CYP3A4. Experimental Design: Human microsomes were usedto determine the cytochrome P450 enzyme(s) involvedin the metabolism of ixabepilone. Computational docking (CYP3A4) studies were done for epothilone B and ixabepilone. A follow-up clinical study was done in patients with cancer to determine if 400 mg/d ketoconazole (inhibitor of CYP3A4) altered the pharmacokinet- ics, drug-target interactions, and pharmacodynamics of ixabepilone. Results: Molecular modeling and human microsomal studies predicted ixabepilone to be a good substrate for CYP3A4. In patients, ketoconazole coadministration resulted in a maximum ixabepi- lone dose administration to 25 mg/m2 when comparedwith single-agent therapy of 40 mg/m 2. Coadministration of ketoconazole with ixabepilone resulted in a 79% increase in AUC0-1.The relationship of microtubule bundle formation in peripheral blood mononuclear cells to plasma ixabepilone concentration was well described by the Hill equation. Microtubule bundle formation in peripheral bloodmononuclear cells correlatedwith neutropenia. -
Enediynes, Enyneallenes, Their Reactions, and Beyond
Advanced Review Enediynes, enyne-allenes, their reactions, and beyond Elfi Kraka∗ and Dieter Cremer Enediynes undergo a Bergman cyclization reaction to form the labile 1,4-didehy- drobenzene (p-benzyne) biradical. The energetics of this reaction and the related Schreiner–Pascal reaction as well as that of the Myers–Saito and Schmittel reac- tions of enyne-allenes are discussed on the basis of a variety of quantum chemical and available experimental results. The computational investigation of enediynes has been beneficial for both experimentalists and theoreticians because it has led to new synthetic challenges and new computational methodologies. The accurate description of biradicals has been one of the results of this mutual fertilization. Other results have been the computer-assisted drug design of new antitumor antibiotics based on the biological activity of natural enediynes, the investigation of hetero- and metallo-enediynes, the use of enediynes in chemical synthesis and C materials science, or an understanding of catalyzed enediyne reactions. " 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. How to cite this article: WIREs Comput Mol Sci 2013. doi: 10.1002/wcms.1174 INTRODUCTION symmetry-allowed pericyclic reactions, (ii) aromatic- ity as a driving force for chemical reactions, and (iii) review on the enediynes is necessarily an ac- the investigation of labile intermediates with biradical count of intense and successful interdisciplinary A character. The henceforth called Bergman cyclization interactions of very different fields in chemistry provided deeper insight into the electronic structure involving among others organic chemistry, matrix of biradical intermediates, the mechanism of organic isolation spectroscopy, quantum chemistry, biochem- reactions, and orbital symmetry rules. -
Prohibited Substances Shall Be Considered As “Specified Substances” Except Substances in Classes S1, S2, S.4.4, S.4.5, S6.A, and Prohibited Methods M1, M2 and M3
BGBl. III - Ausgegeben am 27. Dezember 2019 - Nr. 237 1 von 8 THE 2020 PROHIBITED LIST - WORLD ANTI-DOPING CODE DATE OF ENTRY INTO FORCE: 1 JANUARY 2020 SUBSTANCES AND METHODS PROHIBITED AT ALL TIMES (IN- AND OUT-OF-COMPETITION) IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 4.2.2 OF THE WORLD ANTI-DOPING CODE, ALL PROHIBITED SUBSTANCES SHALL BE CONSIDERED AS “SPECIFIED SUBSTANCES” EXCEPT SUBSTANCES IN CLASSES S1, S2, S.4.4, S.4.5, S6.A, AND PROHIBITED METHODS M1, M2 AND M3. PROHIBITED SUBSTANCES Androstenediol (androst-5-ene-3β,17β-diol); Androstenedione (androst-4-ene-3,17-dione); S0. NON-APPROVED SUBSTANCES Bolasterone; Boldenone; Any pharmacological substance which is not Boldione (androsta-1,4-diene-3,17-dione); addressed by any of the subsequent sections of Calusterone; the List and with no current approval by any Clostebol; governmental regulatory health authority for Danazol ([1,2]oxazolo[4',5':2,3]pregna-4-en- human therapeutic use (e.g. drugs under pre- 20-yn-17α-ol); clinical or clinical development or discontinued, Dehydrochlormethyltestosterone (4-chloro- designer drugs, substances approved only for 17β-hydroxy-17α-methylandrosta-1,4-dien-3- veterinary use) is prohibited at all times. one); Desoxymethyltestosterone (17α-methyl-5α- S1. ANABOLIC AGENTS androst-2-en-17β-ol); Drostanolone; Anabolic agents are prohibited. Epiandrosterone (3β-hydroxy-5α-androstan- …………………………………………………… 17-one); 1. ANABOLIC ANDROGENIC STEROIDS Epi-dihydrotestosterone (17β-hydroxy-5β- (AAS) androstan-3one); Epitestosterone; when administered exogenously, including but -
Advances and Limitations of Antibody Drug Conjugates for Cancer
biomedicines Review Advances and Limitations of Antibody Drug Conjugates for Cancer Candice Maria Mckertish and Veysel Kayser * Sydney School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-2-9351-3391 Abstract: The popularity of antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) has increased in recent years, mainly due to their unrivalled efficacy and specificity over chemotherapy agents. The success of the ADC is partly based on the stability and successful cleavage of selective linkers for the delivery of the payload. The current research focuses on overcoming intrinsic shortcomings that impact the successful devel- opment of ADCs. This review summarizes marketed and recently approved ADCs, compares the features of various linker designs and payloads commonly used for ADC conjugation, and outlines cancer specific ADCs that are currently in late-stage clinical trials for the treatment of cancer. In addition, it addresses the issues surrounding drug resistance and strategies to overcome resistance, the impact of a narrow therapeutic index on treatment outcomes, the impact of drug–antibody ratio (DAR) and hydrophobicity on ADC clearance and protein aggregation. Keywords: antibody drug conjugates; drug resistance; linkers; payloads; therapeutic index; target specific; ADC clearance; protein aggregation Citation: Mckertish, C.M.; Kayser, V. Advances and Limitations of Antibody Drug Conjugates for 1. Introduction Cancer. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 872. Conventional cancer therapy often entails a low therapeutic window and non-specificity https://doi.org/10.3390/ of chemotherapeutic agents that consequently affects normal cells with high mitotic rates biomedicines9080872 and provokes an array of adverse effects, and in some cases leads to drug resistance [1]. -
Phenotype Microarrays Panels PM-M1 to PM-M14
Phenotype MicroArrays™ Panels PM-M1 to PM-M14 for Phenotypic Characterization of Mammalian Cells Assays: Energy Metabolism Pathways Ion and Hormone Effects on Cells Sensitivity to Anti-Cancer Agents and for Optimizing Culture Conditions for Mammalian Cells PRODUCT DESCRIPTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE PM-M1 Cat. #13101 PM-M2 Cat. #13102 PM-M3 Cat. #13103 PM-M4 Cat. #13104 PM-M5 Cat. #13105 PM-M6 Cat. #13106 PM-M7 Cat. #13107 PM-M8 Cat. #13108 PM-M11 Cat. #13111 PM-M12 Cat. #13112 PM-M13 Cat. #13113 PM-M14 Cat. #13114 © 2016 Biolog, Inc. All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America 00P 134 Rev F February 2020 - 1 - CONTENTS I. Introduction ...................................................................................................... 2 a. Overview ................................................................................................... 2 b. Background ............................................................................................... 2 c. Uses ........................................................................................................... 2 d. Advantages ................................................................................................ 3 II. Product Description, PM-M1 to M4 ................................................................ 3 III. Protocols, PM-M1 to M4 ................................................................................. 7 a. Materials Required .................................................................................... 7 b. Determination -
UFC PROHIBITED LIST Effective June 1, 2021 the UFC PROHIBITED LIST
UFC PROHIBITED LIST Effective June 1, 2021 THE UFC PROHIBITED LIST UFC PROHIBITED LIST Effective June 1, 2021 PART 1. Except as provided otherwise in PART 2 below, the UFC Prohibited List shall incorporate the most current Prohibited List published by WADA, as well as any WADA Technical Documents establishing decision limits or reporting levels, and, unless otherwise modified by the UFC Prohibited List or the UFC Anti-Doping Policy, Prohibited Substances, Prohibited Methods, Specified or Non-Specified Substances and Specified or Non-Specified Methods shall be as identified as such on the WADA Prohibited List or WADA Technical Documents. PART 2. Notwithstanding the WADA Prohibited List and any otherwise applicable WADA Technical Documents, the following modifications shall be in full force and effect: 1. Decision Concentration Levels. Adverse Analytical Findings reported at a concentration below the following Decision Concentration Levels shall be managed by USADA as Atypical Findings. • Cannabinoids: natural or synthetic delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) or Cannabimimetics (e.g., “Spice,” JWH-018, JWH-073, HU-210): any level • Clomiphene: 0.1 ng/mL1 • Dehydrochloromethyltestosterone (DHCMT) long-term metabolite (M3): 0.1 ng/mL • Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators (SARMs): 0.1 ng/mL2 • GW-1516 (GW-501516) metabolites: 0.1 ng/mL • Epitrenbolone (Trenbolone metabolite): 0.2 ng/mL 2. SARMs/GW-1516: Adverse Analytical Findings reported at a concentration at or above the applicable Decision Concentration Level but under 1 ng/mL shall be managed by USADA as Specified Substances. 3. Higenamine: Higenamine shall be a Prohibited Substance under the UFC Anti-Doping Policy only In-Competition (and not Out-of- Competition). -
Illuminating Dna Packaging in Sperm Chromatin: How Polycation Lengths, Underprotamination and Disulfide Linkages Alters Dna Condensation and Stability
University of Kentucky UKnowledge Theses and Dissertations--Chemistry Chemistry 2019 ILLUMINATING DNA PACKAGING IN SPERM CHROMATIN: HOW POLYCATION LENGTHS, UNDERPROTAMINATION AND DISULFIDE LINKAGES ALTERS DNA CONDENSATION AND STABILITY Daniel Kirchhoff University of Kentucky, [email protected] Digital Object Identifier: https://doi.org/10.13023/etd.2019.233 Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Kirchhoff, Daniel, "ILLUMINATING DNA PACKAGING IN SPERM CHROMATIN: HOW POLYCATION LENGTHS, UNDERPROTAMINATION AND DISULFIDE LINKAGES ALTERS DNA CONDENSATION AND STABILITY" (2019). Theses and Dissertations--Chemistry. 112. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/chemistry_etds/112 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Chemistry at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations--Chemistry by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT AGREEMENT: I represent that my thesis or dissertation and abstract are my original work. Proper attribution has been given to all outside sources. I understand that I am solely responsible for obtaining any needed copyright permissions. I have obtained needed written permission statement(s) from the owner(s) of each third-party copyrighted matter to be included in my work, allowing electronic distribution (if such use is not permitted by the fair use doctrine) which will be submitted to UKnowledge as Additional File. I hereby grant to The University of Kentucky and its agents the irrevocable, non-exclusive, and royalty-free license to archive and make accessible my work in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. -
)&F1y3x PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX to THE
)&f1y3X PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE )&f1y3X PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE TARIFF SCHEDULE 3 Table 1. This table enumerates products described by International Non-proprietary Names (INN) which shall be entered free of duty under general note 13 to the tariff schedule. The Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) registry numbers also set forth in this table are included to assist in the identification of the products concerned. For purposes of the tariff schedule, any references to a product enumerated in this table includes such product by whatever name known. Product CAS No. Product CAS No. ABAMECTIN 65195-55-3 ACTODIGIN 36983-69-4 ABANOQUIL 90402-40-7 ADAFENOXATE 82168-26-1 ABCIXIMAB 143653-53-6 ADAMEXINE 54785-02-3 ABECARNIL 111841-85-1 ADAPALENE 106685-40-9 ABITESARTAN 137882-98-5 ADAPROLOL 101479-70-3 ABLUKAST 96566-25-5 ADATANSERIN 127266-56-2 ABUNIDAZOLE 91017-58-2 ADEFOVIR 106941-25-7 ACADESINE 2627-69-2 ADELMIDROL 1675-66-7 ACAMPROSATE 77337-76-9 ADEMETIONINE 17176-17-9 ACAPRAZINE 55485-20-6 ADENOSINE PHOSPHATE 61-19-8 ACARBOSE 56180-94-0 ADIBENDAN 100510-33-6 ACEBROCHOL 514-50-1 ADICILLIN 525-94-0 ACEBURIC ACID 26976-72-7 ADIMOLOL 78459-19-5 ACEBUTOLOL 37517-30-9 ADINAZOLAM 37115-32-5 ACECAINIDE 32795-44-1 ADIPHENINE 64-95-9 ACECARBROMAL 77-66-7 ADIPIODONE 606-17-7 ACECLIDINE 827-61-2 ADITEREN 56066-19-4 ACECLOFENAC 89796-99-6 ADITOPRIM 56066-63-8 ACEDAPSONE 77-46-3 ADOSOPINE 88124-26-9 ACEDIASULFONE SODIUM 127-60-6 ADOZELESIN 110314-48-2 ACEDOBEN 556-08-1 ADRAFINIL 63547-13-7 ACEFLURANOL 80595-73-9 ADRENALONE