Minnesota at Gettysburg and Vicksburg

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Minnesota at Gettysburg and Vicksburg L R: Minnesota at Gettysburg and Vicksburg A S 1863 was a Pivotal Year— simply a fi ght to preserve the Union; listment of black troops, the Eman- a “game changer” in modern a new moral imperative had been cipation Proclamation, and the fl ight parlance— for the course and conse- embraced— the death of slavery. This of African Americans from slavery quence of the American Civil War. paradigm shift for the North meant as the Union Army moved into the After two bloody years, it was bru- that there was no place for compro- South foreshadowed changes to the tally clear to both North and South mise. If the North were to be victori- framework of American society and that the confl ict was going to be long ous, then the South would have to be challenged white America’s per- and costly, not the brief affair some subdued. spective on race. Draft riots in New politicians and military leaders had 1863 was also a year of spectacle, York City, bread riots in Richmond, presumed in 1861. Abraham Lin- transformation, and turmoil. The en- Virginia, and resistance to the war coln’s Emancipation Proclamation, issued in January, changed the tenor Fourth Minnesota Regiment Entering Vicksburg, July 4, 1863, Francis D. Millet’s of the war as well. It was no longer 1907 painting that hangs in the Governor’s Reception Room, Minnesota State Capitol 220 Minnesota History MNHist_Sum13-opt.indd 220 6/5/13 1:35 PM in the North and South alike led to Gettysburg propelled the regiment to pushed the Federals back through upheaval on the home front. legendary status as one of the most Gettysburg to Culp’s Hill and Ceme- Some of the war’s largest and distinguished fighting units of the tery Ridge, south of town. Reinforce- most important campaigns provided Civil War, while the Vicksburg Cam- ments from both armies arrived that the spectacle as well as dreadfully paign added luster to the reputation evening, including the First Min- long casualty lists. The concurrent of Minnesota units that had fought nesota Infantry as part of Maj. Gen. Union victories at Gettysburg, Penn- with distinction at Shiloh, Tennessee, Winfield Scott Hancock’s Second sylvania, and Vicksburg, Mississippi, and Iuka and Corinth, Mississippi. Army Corps. in July 1863 marked a crucial turn- Vicksburg also played a part in re- The First Minnesota had the ing point. At Gettysburg, Confeder- storing the morale and stature of the distinction of being the first state ate Gen. Robert E. Lee lost a critical Third Minnesota Infantry, which had volunteer regiment formally ten- engagement and returned to Virginia been deceived by Confederate cavalry dered in response to President Lin- with a battered army that would commander Nathan Bedford Forrest coln’s call for 75,000 troops in 1861. never again be able to launch a major into surrendering at Murfreesboro, Organized at Fort Snelling on April offensive. With the Confederate sur- Tennessee, on July 13, 1862. 29, 1861, and re- mustered for three render of Vicksburg, the Union Army years of service on May 10, the First secured control of the Mississippi Minnesota had its baptism by fire River, a vital transportation source Hallowed Ground: on July 21, 1861, at Bull Run, where for northern commerce, and effec- Gettysburg it was among the last units to retire tively split the Confederacy in half. from the field and suffered some of Coming the day after Lee’s defeat at Following on the heels the heaviest casualties of any Union Gettysburg, the fall of Vicksburg also of his brilliant victory at the Battle regiment. Its men served faithfully had a significant impact on morale, of Chancellorsville in May 1863, Lee throughout 1862, including at the North and South. Southerners won- led his Army of Northern Virginia in battles of Antietam and Fredericks- dered if their dream of independence a second invasion of the North. (An burg and in the Peninsula Campaign, could be sustained, while northern- unsuccessful campaign was waged in but their true test of courage came ers renewed their hope for a reunited Maryland in September 1862.) With on the second day at Gettysburg. country. his men in high spirits, Lee planned On the morning of July 2 the Minnesota’s soldiers played key to secure provisions from the rich First Minnesota was situated on the roles at both pivotal engagements, Pennsylvania farmlands and take left of the Federal line along Cem- with the First Minnesota Volunteer the fighting away from war- torn Vir- etery Ridge as part of a fishhook- Infantry making a sacrificial charge ginia. He also hoped that winning a shaped defensive position that to hold the Union line at Gettysburg, major victory on northern soil might stretched across the hills and ridges and the Fourth Minnesota Volunteer bring the Federals closer to peace ne- south of Gettysburg. The regiment Infantry being among the first Fed- gotiations. Urged by President Lin- had roughly a third of its original eral troops to enter Vicksburg. The coln, Maj. Gen. Joseph Hooker sent complement of 1,000 men reporting Fifth Minnesota Volunteer Infantry his Union Army of the Potomac in for duty under the command of Col. and the First Minnesota Battery of pursuit but was relieved of command William Colvill of Red Wing. Light Artillery also served as veteran just three days before the battle. His In the afternoon, Lee launched a campaigners in the seven- month replacement, Maj. Gen. George G. heavy assault on the Union left flank, battle for Vicksburg, while the Third Meade, moved northward, keeping and fierce fighting raged at Devil’s Minnesota Volunteer Infantry par- his army between Lee and Washing- Den, Little Round Top, the Wheat- ticipated in the final push to take the ton, D.C. When Lee discovered that field, and Cemetery Ridge. About city. The First Minnesota’s exploits at Meade was in Pennsylvania, he 6 p.m., Confederate brigades attacked concentrated his army in the vicinity near the Peach Orchard on the Em- of Gettysburg. mitsburg Road. Eight companies of Adam Scher is a senior curator in the collections department at the Minne- Elements of the two armies col- the First Minnesota Infantry were in sota Historical Society. lided west and north of the town support of Company C of the Fourth on July 1, 1863; the Confederates U.S. Artillery, and from their posi- Summer 2013 221 MNHist_Sum13-opt.indd 221 6/5/13 1:35 PM tion they watched as Union troops of iment halted at the dry streambed of the Third Army Corps retreated in Plum Run to fi re their muskets, then disorder. Desperate to halt the Con- commenced their charge with leveled federate advance until reserves could bayonets. “Bullets whistled past us, arrive, Gen. Hancock rode out to Col. shells screached over us; canister and Colvill and ordered the vastly out- grape fell about us,” wrote Sgt. Alfred numbered First Minnesota to attack. Carpenter of Company K. “Comrade Lt. William Lochren of Company after comrade dropped from the K later recalled, “Every man real- ranks; but on the line went. No one ized in an instant what that order took a second look at his fallen com- meant— death or wounds to us all; panion. We had no time to weep.” 1 the sacrifi ce of the regiment to gain a The Confederates met the attack few minutes time and save the posi- with great resistance, but the Min- tion, and probably the battlefi eld— nesotans held fi rm until reserves and every man saw and accepted the arrived. The First Minnesota had necessity for the sacrifi ce.” Advancing fulfi lled its mission, but at a terrible William Colvill, First Minnesota 300 yards over open ground, the reg- price; historians estimate that likely Infantry, about 1863 60 to 80 percent of those participat- Ambulance wagon, ing in the charge became casualties, wounded in the right shoulder and Battle of Bull Run, 1861 including Col. Colvill, who was right ankle. With Colvill disabled 222 Minnesota History MNHist_Sum13-opt.indd 222 6/5/13 1:35 PM “If men ever become devils, that was one of the times. We were crazy with the excitement of the fi ght.” and most of his offi cers killed or line went down like grass before the regimental colors after they had wounded, command of the regiment scythe,” remembered one veteran. fallen and then leading his comrades devolved to Capt. Nathan S. Messick The Minnesotans just happened to in a charge against the advancing of Company G. Although the Confed- be positioned at one of the few places Confederates. Pickett’s Charge was erates had gained ground, the Union where Union lines were breached repulsed at great expense to the Con- defenders still held strong positions and, as a result, charged the advanc- federate army, which suffered nearly by the end of the day. ing Confederates one last time as a 5,600 casualties. Union losses num- The battle reached its climax on unit. The fi ghting became frantic, as bered about 1,500, including 17 killed July 3 with Pickett’s Charge, a dra- recounted by the First Minnesota’s and wounded in the First Minnesota. matic Confederate infantry assault Lt. William Harmon of Company C: Shot in the head, commanding of- against the center of the Union line “If men ever become devils, that was fi cer Messick was among the dead; on Cemetery Ridge. Despite the one of the times. We were crazy with the regiment was taken over by Capt. appalling casualties suffered the pre- the excitement of the fi ght.
Recommended publications
  • Brochure Design by Communication Design, Inc., Richmond, VA 877-584-8395 Cheatham Co
    To Riggins Hill CLARKSVILLE MURFREESBORO and Fort Defiance Scroll flask and .36 caliber Navy Colt bullet mold N found at Camp Trousdale . S P R site in Sumner County. IN G Stones River S T Courtesy Pat Meguiar . 41 National Battlefield The Cannon Ball House 96 and Cemetery in Blountville still 41 Oaklands shows shell damage to Mansion KNOXVILLE ST. the exterior clapboard LEGE Recapture of 441 COL 231 Evergreen in the rear of the house. Clarksville Cemetery Clarksville 275 40 in the Civil War Rutherford To Ramsey Surrender of ST. County Knoxville National Cemetery House MMERCE Clarksville CO 41 96 Courthouse Old Gray Cemetery Plantation Customs House Whitfield, Museum Bradley & Co. Knoxville Mabry-Hazen Court House House 231 40 “Drawing Artillery Across the Mountains,” East Tennessee Saltville 24 Fort History Center Harper’s Weekly, Nov. 21, 1863 (Multiple Sites) Bleak House Sanders Museum 70 60 68 Crew repairing railroad Chilhowie Fort Dickerson 68 track near Murfreesboro 231 after Battle of Stones River, 1863 – Courtesy 421 81 Library of Congress 129 High Ground 441 Abingdon Park “Battle of Shiloh” – Courtesy Library of Congress 58 41 79 23 58 Gen. George H. Thomas Cumberland 421 Courtesy Library of Congress Gap NHP 58 Tennessee Capitol, Nashville, 1864 Cordell Hull Bristol Courtesy Library of Congress Adams Birthplace (East Hill Cemetery) 51 (Ft. Redmond) Cold Spring School Kingsport Riggins Port Royal Duval-Groves House State Park Mountain Hill State Park City 127 (Lincoln and the 33 Blountville 79 Red Boiling Springs Affair at Travisville 431 65 Portland Indian Mountain Cumberland Gap) 70 11W (See Inset) Clarksville 76 (Palace Park) Clay Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War Battles in Tennessee
    Civil War Battles in Tennessee Lesson plans for primary sources at the Tennessee State Library & Archives Author: Rebecca Byrd, New Center Elementary Grade Level: 5th grade Date Created: May 2018 Visit http://sos.tn.gov/tsla/education for additional lesson plans. Civil War Battles in Tennessee Introduction: Tennessee’s Civil War experience was unique. Tennessee was the last state to se- cede and the first to rejoin the Union. Middle and West Tennessee supported secession by and large, but the majority of East Tennessee opposed secession. Ironically, Middle and West Tennessee came under Union control early in the war, while East Tennessee remained in Confederate hands. Tennessee is second only to Virginia in number of battles fought in the state. In this lesson, students will explore the economic and emotional effects of the war on the citizens of Tennessee. Guiding Questions How can context clues help determine an author’s point of view? How did Civil War battles affect the short term and long term ability of Tennesseans to earn a living? How did Civil War battles affect the emotions of Tennesseans? Learning Objectives The learner will analyze primary source documents to determine whether the creator/author supported the Union or Confederacy. The learner will make inferences to determine the long term and short term economic effects of Civil War battles on the people of Tennessee. The learner will make inferences to determine the emotional affect the Civil War had on Tennesseans. 1 Curriculum Standards: SSP.02 Critically examine
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline 1864
    CIVIL WAR TIMELINE 1864 January Radical Republicans are hostile to Lincoln’s policies, fearing that they do not provide sufficient protection for ex-slaves, that the 10% amnesty plan is not strict enough, and that Southern states should demonstrate more significant efforts to eradicate the slave system before being allowed back into the Union. Consequently, Congress refuses to recognize the governments of Southern states, or to seat their elected representatives. Instead, legislators begin to work on their own Reconstruction plan, which will emerge in July as the Wade-Davis Bill. [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/reconstruction/states/sf_timeline.html] [http://www.blackhistory.harpweek.com/4Reconstruction/ReconTimeline.htm] Congress now understands the Confederacy to be the face of a deeply rooted cultural system antagonistic to the principles of a “free labor” society. Many fear that returning home rule to such a system amounts to accepting secession state by state and opening the door for such malicious local legislation as the Black Codes that eventually emerge. [Hunt] Jan. 1 TN Skirmish at Dandridge. Jan. 2 TN Skirmish at LaGrange. Nashville is in the grip of a smallpox epidemic, which will carry off a large number of soldiers, contraband workers, and city residents. It will be late March before it runs its course. Jan 5 TN Skirmish at Lawrence’s Mill. Jan. 10 TN Forrest’s troops in west Tennessee are said to have collected 2,000 recruits, 400 loaded Wagons, 800 beef cattle, and 1,000 horses and mules. Most observers consider these numbers to be exaggerated. “ The Mississippi Squadron publishes a list of the steamboats destroyed on the Mississippi and its tributaries during the war: 104 ships were burned, 71 sunk.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War Generals Buried in Spring Grove Cemetery by James Barnett
    Spring Grove Cemetery, once characterized as blending "the elegance of a park with the pensive beauty of a burial-place," is the final resting- place of forty Cincinnatians who were generals during the Civil War. Forty For the Union: Civil War Generals Buried in Spring Grove Cemetery by James Barnett f the forty Civil War generals who are buried in Spring Grove Cemetery, twenty-three had advanced from no military experience whatsoever to attain the highest rank in the Union Army. This remarkable feat underscores the nature of the Northern army that suppressed the rebellion of the Confed- erate states during the years 1861 to 1865. Initially, it was a force of "inspired volunteers" rather than a standing army in the European tradition. Only seven of these forty leaders were graduates of West Point: Jacob Ammen, Joshua H. Bates, Sidney Burbank, Kenner Garrard, Joseph Hooker, Alexander McCook, and Godfrey Weitzel. Four of these seven —Burbank, Garrard, Mc- Cook, and Weitzel —were in the regular army at the outbreak of the war; the other three volunteered when the war started. Only four of the forty generals had ever been in combat before: William H. Lytle, August Moor, and Joseph Hooker served in the Mexican War, and William H. Baldwin fought under Giuseppe Garibaldi in the Italian civil war. This lack of professional soldiers did not come about by chance. When the Constitutional Convention met in Philadelphia in 1787, its delegates, who possessed a vast knowledge of European history, were determined not to create a legal basis for a standing army. The founding fathers believed that the stand- ing armies belonging to royalty were responsible for the endless bloody wars that plagued Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • The Other Side of the Monument: Memory, Preservation, and the Battles of Franklin and Nashville
    THE OTHER SIDE OF THE MONUMENT: MEMORY, PRESERVATION, AND THE BATTLES OF FRANKLIN AND NASHVILLE by JOE R. BAILEY B.S., Austin Peay State University, 2006 M.A., Austin Peay State University, 2008 AN ABSTRACT OF A DISSERTATION submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of History College of Arts and Sciences KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2015 Abstract The thriving areas of development around the cities of Franklin and Nashville in Tennessee bear little evidence of the large battles that took place there during November and December, 1864. Pointing to modern development to explain the failed preservation of those battlefields, however, radically oversimplifies how those battlefields became relatively obscure. Instead, the major factor contributing to the lack of preservation of the Franklin and Nashville battlefields was a fractured collective memory of the two events; there was no unified narrative of the battles. For an extended period after the war, there was little effort to remember the Tennessee Campaign. Local citizens and veterans of the battles simply wanted to forget the horrific battles that haunted their memories. Furthermore, the United States government was not interested in saving the battlefields at Franklin and Nashville. Federal authorities, including the War Department and Congress, had grown tired of funding battlefields as national parks and could not be convinced that the two battlefields were worthy of preservation. Moreover, Southerners and Northerners remembered Franklin and Nashville in different ways, and historians mainly stressed Eastern Theater battles, failing to assign much significance to Franklin and Nashville. Throughout the 20th century, infrastructure development encroached on the battlefields and they continued to fade from public memory.
    [Show full text]
  • July 1863: Turning Point of Civil War by Daniel Koch
    JULY 1863: TURNING POINT OF CIVIL WAR BY DANIEL KOCH Photo credit/VICKSBURG NATIONAL MILITARY PARK A Grand Illumination was July 3 at Vicksburg National Military Park with luminaries placed at state monuments representing the number of total casualties from that state. Because Ohio never erected one large state memorial an Ohio regimental monument was chosen to host the 1,313 luminaries representing total casualties at Vicksburg from the Buckeye State. SANDUSKY July 1863 is arguably the most important month in American history. Others may argue July 1776, when this nation was founded, or June 1944, when the Allies saved the world. The latter are indeed valid arguments. This country, however — founded in 1776 with the institution of slavery intact — had to be molded into “a more perfect union” than that spoken of in the preamble to the United States Constitution, written in 1787. And the nation that went to war in December 1941, eventually landing at Normandy in 1944, could not have become world power it is today if July 1863 had turned out differently. If the Union victories of July 1863 had instead become Confederate victories, there is a good chance the United States we know today would be under at least two flags. Twin Union battlefield victories in the third summer of the Civil War at Vicksburg and Gettysburg put the first nails in the coffin of the Southern Confederacy. A third and often- forgotten campaign in Tennessee that summer, the Tullahoma Campaign, may not have been as bloody as the other battles in Mississippi and Pennsylvania, but it had the effect of maneuvering a Confederate Army out of Middle Tennessee and capturing the strategic railroad hub of Chattanooga.
    [Show full text]
  • American Civil War
    American Civil War Major Battles & Minor Engagements 1861-1865 1861 ........ p. 2 1862 ........ p. 4 1863 ........ p. 9 1864 ........ p. 13 1865 ........ p. 19 CIVIL WAR IMPRESSIONIST ASSOCIATION 1 Civil War Battles: 1861 Eastern Theater April 12 - Battle of Fort Sumter (& Fort Moultie), Charleston Harbor, South Carolina. The bombardment/siege and ultimate surrender of Fort Sumter by Brig. General P.G.T. Beauregard was the official start of the Civil War. https://www.nps.gov/fosu/index.htm June 3 - Battle of Philippi, (West) Virginia A skirmish involving over 3,000 soldiers, Philippi was the first battle of the American Civil War. June 10 - Big Bethel, Virginia The skirmish of Big Bethel was the first land battle of the civil war and was a portent of the carnage that was to come. July 11 - Rich Mountain, (West) Virginia July 21 - First Battle of Bull Run, Manassas, Virginia Also known as First Manassas, the first major engagement of the American Civil War was a shocking rout of Union soldiers by confederates at Manassas Junction, VA. August 28-29 - Hatteras Inlet, North Carolina September 10 - Carnifax Ferry, (West) Virginia September 12-15 - Cheat Mountain, (West) Virginia October 3 - Greenbrier River, (West) Virginia October 21 - Ball's Bluff, Virginia October 9 - Battle of Santa Rosa Island, Santa Rosa Island (Florida) The Battle of Santa Rosa Island was a failed attempt by Confederate forces to take the Union-held Fort Pickens. November 7-8 - Battle of Port Royal Sound, Port Royal Sound, South Carolina The battle of Port Royal was one of the earliest amphibious operations of the American Civil War.
    [Show full text]
  • Battle of Mobile Bay
    CONFEDERATE HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION OF BELGIUM NY NY HistoricalSociety - dson PaintingbyDavi J.O. INTRODUCTION Students of the Civil War find no shortage of material regarding the battle of Mobile Bay. There are numerous stirring accounts of Farragut’s dramatic damning of the “torpedoes” and the guns of Fort Morgan, and of the gallant but futile resistance offered by the CSS Tennessee to the entire Union Fleet. These accounts range from the reminiscences of participants to the capably analyzed reappraisals by Centennial historians. It is particularly frustrating then, to find hardly any adequate description of the land campaign for Mobile in the general accounts of the War between the States. A few lines are usually deemed sufficient by historians to relate this campaign to reduce the last major confederate stronghold in the West, described as the best fortified city in the Confederacy by General Joseph E. Johnston, and which indeed did not fall until after General Lee’s surrender at Appomattox. It fell then to an attacking Federal force of some 45,000 troops, bolstered by a formidable siege train and by the support of the Federal Navy. Battles and Leaders of the Civil War, to give one example, devotes 33 well illustrated pages to the battle of Mobile Bay, but allows only one page for the land CONFEDERATE HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION OF BELGIUM operations of 1865 ! The following account is written as a small contribution to the Civil War Centennial and is intended to provide a brief but reasonably comprehensive account of the campaign. Operations will from necessity be viewed frequently from the positions of the attacking Federal forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter 3
    x Frederick H. Hackeman CAMP 85 December 2019 Commander’s Ramblings Brothers, As voted and approved at the September meeting, the camp will collect dues for all three levels of the SUVCW at $40.00 each year. This is to increase the bank balance to enable us to begin funding a more robust level of activities to include Eagle Scout and Flag cer- tificate presentations, the Last Soldier in Berrien County ceremony (Grave Marker purchase), and other activities that could entail an expense. One thing I would like to see is for each camp brother to continue to research and find other Union ancestors and submit Supplemental War applicatitons for these ancestors. They are just as worthy of remem- bering and honoring as our initial Ancestor. It was interesting for me to research and identify two more Union soldiers in my lmited ancestry (I have English immigrant ancestors in the late 1890’s). Get Ready, Get Set, Start your digging! There was discussion in September of previous activities that earned some money for the Camp coffers. If anyone can remember Commander and pass along what those activities were, please do so. They could be an- to Page 7 other means by which we can increase our financial state such that we can In this Issue Page 1 - Commander’s Ramblings Page 2 - Civil War Christmas Veterans of the Civil Page 4 - Berrien County in the War - 3rd Cavalry Page 6 - Book Report Page 7 - A Thanksgiving Proclamation Page 9 - November Camp minutes Page 10 - National &Department Events Page 11 - Civil War Time Line Page 13 - Battle of Nashville Page 19 - Member Ancestors List Sons of the Union Camp Communicator Next Camp Meeting January 9, 2012 - 6 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Siege at Vicksburg Reading Comprehension Name: ______
    Siege at Vicksburg Reading Comprehension Name: _________________________ The Gibraltar of the Confederacy By 1863, Union forces had gained control over much of the Mississippi River. President Abraham Lincoln considered control of the nation's largest waterway crucial, but the fortified city of Vicksburg, Mississippi, located above a horseshoe-shaped bend in the river, stood in the way of Union success. As long as Vicksburg was controlled by the Confederacy, the Union could not navigate the river and the Confederacy could ship supplies and send communications between its parts east and west of the river. Located high on the bluffs overlooking the river, Vicksburg was referred to as "the Gibraltar of the Confederacy." Attacking Vicksburg was difficult. It was surrounded by swamps and poor country roads. Furthermore, there was a giant fortress atop the bluffs making a naval assault virtually impossible. Direct Assault, Impossible. Preparing for a Siege Prior to the Siege of Vicksburg, Union General Ulysses S. Grant had won control of Mississippi River ports in Louisiana, as well as Mississippi's capital, Jackson. Confederate forces, facing an overwhelming Union assault, were forced to withdraw to the fortifications of Vicksburg. Grant, fully cognizant of the difficulties of taking Vicksburg, ordered an immediate assault on the city before the Confederates could get fully organized and entrenched. Union forces would come under withering fire as they attempted to negotiate steep ravines, deep ditches, and the 17-foot-high walls of what was called the Stockade Redan. Their first assault, on May 19th, under the command of Major Generals William T. Sherman and Francis Blair, were summarily repulsed resulting in crushing casualties as Confederate forces fired on them from above.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin University Publications
    Eastern Illinois University The Keep Eastern Illinois University Bulletin University Publications 4-12-1961 Bulletin 234 - Coles County in the Civil War 1861-1865 Eastern Illinois University Follow this and additional works at: http://thekeep.eiu.edu/eiu_bulletin Recommended Citation Eastern Illinois University, "Bulletin 234 - Coles County in the Civil War 1861-1865" (1961). Eastern Illinois University Bulletin. 74. http://thekeep.eiu.edu/eiu_bulletin/74 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University Publications at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in Eastern Illinois University Bulletin by an authorized administrator of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Coles County In The Civil War 1861-1865 DEDICATION "Coles County in the Civil War" IS DEDICATED TO DR. CHARLES HUBERT COLEMAN in recognition of his scholarship in the Civil War field and the great respect accorded him by fellow Lincoln scholars, former students and friends everywhere. Table Of Contents Coles County In The Civil War ------------------------------- 5 Coles County's Contribution To The War Effort --------------- 5 Brief Histories Of The Infantry And Cavalry Regiments In Which Coles County Men Served ____________ 24 Battle Of Atlanta (Letters Of James A. Connolly) ____________ 47 A Charleston Company Goes To War ------------------------- 63 Roster Of Company C, 8th Illinois Regiment ------------------- 74 The Charleston Riot ----------------------------------------- 78 = Cover Picture Description The cover picture is of the color bearers of the Seventh Regiment of Illinois Volunteers. Illinois raised six regiments in the Mexican War. Out of deference to these, the numbers of the Civil War regiments started with seven.
    [Show full text]
  • GETTYSBURG, VICKSBURG, and CHATTANOOGA by Shannon De La Garza History of the Americas Mr
    GETTYSBURG, VICKSBURG, AND CHATTANOOGA By Shannon de la Garza History of the Americas Mr. Beck 6th Hour Gettysburg Key Players General Robert E. Lee • Confederate • Led the Army of Northern Virginia • Took the offensive at Gettysburg • Offered to Resign after Gettysburg • President Davis declined Major General George Meade • Yankee • Took command from General Joseph Hooker three days before the battle • Provided a strong front which held off confederate troops for the first two days of the battle. • Criticized for letting the Confederates retreat after the battle. Major General John Buford • Yankee • Set the stage for the battle • His Calvary healed off confederate troops before the battle. • On the front lines chasing the Confederates back to Virginia. John Burns • Yankee • "The Old Hero of Gettysburg" • Union army told the 67 year old that he was too old to fight in the army • When the fight broke out he took his musket and fought in the battle Major General George Pickett • Confederate • Commanded a small force • Let Pickett's charge • Took the most ground for the confederates during the battle • Heavy losses made the charge a failure. David Kendlehart • Yankee • Refused Confederate demands to send $5,000 or large quantities of supplies to troops. • Snuck to Mead's camp to tell of Confederate retreat. Jeanie Wade • Only civilian casualty of the battle • She and her family prepared bread for the Union troops during the battle Brig. Gen. Joshua Chamberlain • Led the 20th Maine Infantry • Medal of Honor recipient General James Longstreet • Confederate • First served in Mexican American War • Skeptical about the battle • Troops from his corps charged across an open field • Suffered extreme casualties • Spent rest of his life asserting his opposing Gettysburg The Gettysburg Campaign • After the Confederate victory at Chancellorsville, Virginia, Robert E.
    [Show full text]