DOCSLIB.ORG

New Concepts and Methods for Phylogenetic Taxonomy And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Megataxa 006 (1): 073–076 ISSN 2703-3082 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/mt/ MEGATAXA Copyright © 2021 Magnolia Press Correspondence ISSN 2703-3090 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/megataxa.6.1.4 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2F4168BA-C730-43F4-A729-EA8CA0C8E714 New concepts and methods for phylogenetic taxonomy and nomenclature in zoology, exemplified by a new ranked cladonomy of recent amphibians (Lissamphibia): corrigenda and addenda ALAIN DUBOIS1, ANNEMARIE OHLER2 & R. ALEXANDER PYRON3 1 Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, EPHE, Université des Antilles, Paris, France. [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6463-3435 2 Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, EPHE, Université des Antilles, Paris, France. [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6531-464X; Phone: +33 140 79 34 86 3 Department of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington DC, USA. [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2524-1794; Phone: +1 (202) 994 6616 Just after the publication of our paper (Dubois et al. males of Fritziana goeldii from those of the superficially 2021), we discovered that, in Table 1, pages 443 and similar Scinax trapicheiroi in the field).” Our diagnosis 444 are identical, and the actual page 443 is missing. We was taken from Duellman (2015), but the situation is here provide this page, and we took this opportunity to more complicated. Among the seven species currently correct a few other errors in this paper. We provide below referred to this genus, only two (F. izecksohni and F. ulei) corrections only in the case of misspellings or other have I < II (Miranda-Ribero 1926, Folly et al. 2018), errors that may induce misunderstandings of our text, the species F. mitus, F. tonimi and F. goeldii have I > II not for pure format problems (concerning punctuation, (Boulenger 1895, Walker et al. 2016, 2018), and F. fissilis parentheses, italics, bold and capital letters), which do not and F. ohausi have either I < II or I = II (Miranda-Ribero impede understanding of our text. 1926, Heyer et al. 1990). Therefore this character is not diagnostic of the genus and of the subfamily and should be deleted from the diagnoses of both taxa. [1] Page 71, entry {e2}, line 1. Replace: [5] Page 172, first paragraph, last line but one. auctor(s) Replace: by: Espadrana auctor(es) by: Espadarana [2] Page 71, entry {e3}, line 1. Replace: [6] Page 223, paragraph Comments, last but one line. auctor(s) Replace: by: Hylambates maculatus Duméril, 1953 auctor(es) by: Hylambates maculatus Duméril, 1853 [3] Page 139, line 1. Replace: [7] Page 349, column 1, reference 10. Paez- Replace: by: Paez-Vacas, Páez- by: Páez-Vacas, [4] Page 153, first entry Diagnosis, line 6. Delete: [8] Page 371, entry Auctorship, line 1. first finger shorter than second; Replace: Note. Davor Vrcibradic (personal communication) wrote E: see Scriptor. to us: “Actually, the first finger is usually longer than the by: second in Fritziana (this is how I learned to differentiate E: see Auctor. Submitted: 14 Apr. 2021; accepted by Z.-Q. Zhang: 14 Apr. 2021; published: 8 Jun. 2021 73 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-N.C. 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ [9] Page 374, entry Dendrogram, line 2. [19] Page 454, entry Genus-series nomen or apograph, Replace: paragraph 2, line 2. Mayr et al. 1953: 58 81 (see Brower 2016). Replace: by: authors or scriptors Mayr et al. 1953: 58, 175 (see Brower 2016). by: auctores or scriptores [10] Page 378, entry External airesy, line 2. Replace: [20] Page 454, entry Genus-series nomen or apograph, auctor(s) paragraph 5, lines 3‒4. by: Replace: auctor(es) scriptor(s), which is not followed by a comma. [11] Page 382, entry Internal airesy, line 1. by: Replace: scriptor(es), auctor(s) which is/are not followed by a comma. by: auctor(es) [21] Page 496, column 3, entry Huicundomantis, line 1. Replace: [12] Page 383, entry Klonon, line 2. Paéz Replace: by: pathenogenesis Páez by: parthenogenesis [22] Pages 525 and 690, nomen Paraheleioporus Hoser, 2019. [13] Page 384, entry Lethakyronym, line 3. Note. This nomen is the only one established by Raymond Replace: Hoser mentioned in our paper, as an invalid synonym, but Code: no term. this author established many other amphibian nomina, of by: the species-, genus- and family-series, in the volumes 33, Code: nomen oblitum. 39, 43, 44‒46, 47 and 47‒91 of the Australasian Journal of Herpetology. Following a controversial paper by Kaiser [14] Page 384, entry Mandatory. et al. (2013), the nomenclatural status of this journal and This entry should be after the entry LZP. of all these nomina are currently hotly debated in the taxonomic community. This case involves a number of [15] Page 384, entry Mandatory ending correction, line scientific (both taxonomic and nomenclatural), ethical 1. and sociological questions, and it could and should, in our Replace: opinion, not be solved by individual or collective actions nothograh of zoologists, but by a decision of the International by: Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. However, the nothograph Commission has not yet voted on the Case 3601 (Hoser 2013), which requests a confirmation or infirmation of the [16] Page 384, entry Mandatory spelling correction, availability of these works and nomina. In the meanwhile, line 1. waiting for this long overdue decision, we consider the Replace: status of these nomina as yet unsettled (i.e., neither nothograh available nor unavailable, and therefore neither valid nor by: invalid), and we consider useless to list these new nomina nothograph here. [17] Page 385, entry Monophyletic, lines 3‒4. [23] Page 551, column 2, lines 11 and 12, and page 705, Replace: line 2. but including either all of them (see holophyletic or only Replace: some of them (see paraphyletic); pennatribus by: by: but including either all of them (see holophyletic) or only pennatulus some of them (see paraphyletic); [18] Page 443. Replace the page 443 of Appendix A2.TREE-1 in the original paper by the page provided hereafter. 74 • Megataxa 006 (1) © 2021 Magnolia Press DUBOIS ET AL. Rupirana cardosoi Paratelmatobiinae Crossodactylodes mantiqueira 99 Crossodactylodes bokermanni 100 Crossodactylodes izecksohni 100 Crossodactylodes sawayae Crossodactylodes cardosoi 100 Crossodactylodes gaigeae 98 Crossodactylodes poecilogaster Lithodytes lineatus Adenomerini Adenomera lutzi 100 Adenomera heyeri Adenomera andreae 100 Adenomera martinezi 97 Adenomera diptyx Leptodactylinae 100 Adenomera hylaedactyla 94 Adenomera thomei 100 Adenomera engelsi 100 Adenomera araucaria Leptodactylus syphax Leptodactylus caparu Leptodactylus rhodomystax 92 Leptodactylus riveroi Leptodactylini 96 Leptodactylus silvanimbus Leptodactylus chaquensis 98 Leptodactylus bolivianus 100 Leptodactylus insularum Leptodactylus latrans Leptodactylus melanonotus Leptodactylus leptodactyloides Leptodactylus wagneri 91 100 Leptodactylus validus 99 97 Leptodactylus diedrus 95 Leptodactylus podicipinus Leptodactylus discodactylus 94 Leptodactylus griseigularis Leptodactylus vastus Leptodactylus stenodema 100 Leptodactylus pentadactylus 93 Leptodactylus knudseni Leptodactylus myersi Leptodactylus labyrinthicus Leptodactylus fallax Leptodactylus rhodonotus Leptodactylus mystacinus 95 Leptodactylus poecilochilus Leptodactylus albilabris 97 97 Leptodactylus longirostris 91 Leptodactylus fuscus Leptodactylus bufonius Leptodactylus fragilis Leptodactylus gracilis Leptodactylus plaumanni 92 Leptodactylus elenae Leptodactylus spixi 100 Leptodactylus mystaceus Leptodactylus didymus 98 Leptodactylus notoaktites Allophrynidae Allophryne relicta 100 Allophryne ruthveni 100 Allophryne resplendens Celsiella vozmedianoi 100 Celsiella revocata Hyalinobatrachium valerioi 100 Hyalinobatrachium aureoguttatum Hyalinobatrachium talamancae Hyalinobatrachinae 90 90 100 Hyalinobatrachium bergeri 100 Hyalinobatrachium pellucidum Hyalinobatrachium chirripoi 98 Hyalinobatrachium colymbiphyllum Hyalinobatrachium cappellei 98 100 100 Hyalinobatrachium taylori Centrolenoidea 99 Hyalinobatrachium iaspidiense 100 Hyalinobatrachium tricolor Hyalinobatrachium orientale 91 Hyalinobatrachium orocostale 100 Hyalinobatrachium fragile 98 Hyalinobatrachium duranti 100 Hyalinobatrachium ibama 99 Hyalinobatrachium pallidum 98 Hyalinobatrachium munozorum 100 Hyalinobatrachium mondolfii Hyalinobatrachium tatayoi 100 100 100 Hyalinobatrachium fleischmanni Centrolenidae Hyalinobatrachium carlesvilai Hyalinobatrachium kawense Ikakoginae Ikakogi tayrona Teratohyla pulverata Teratohylina Teratohyla amelie 91 Teratohyla spinosa 100 Teratohyla adenocheira 99 Teratohyla midas Vitreorana uranoscopa Vitreorana antisthenesi 100 Vitreorana castroviejoi Vitreoranina Vitreorana eurygnatha Vitreorana gorzulae NEW LISSAMPHIBIAN CLADONOMY: ADDENDA Megataxa 006 (1) © 2021 Magnolia Press • 75 [24] Page 718, entry 23 G: Aquiloeurycea, line 4. 5, 1‒738. Replace: https://doi.org/10.11646/megataxa.5.1.1 Thornea Duellman, W.E. (2015) Marsupial frogs: Gastrotheca & allied by: genera. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, i–xviii + Thornella 408 pp. Note. The spelling Thornea appears only once in our Folly, M., Hepp, F. & Carvalho-e-Silva, S.P. (2018) A new paper, being a misprint for Thornella which is used bromeligenous species of Fritziana Mello-Leitão, 1937 throughout the rest of the paper.
Recommended publications
  • Catalogue of the Amphibians of Venezuela: Illustrated and Annotated Species List, Distribution, and Conservation 1,2César L

    Catalogue of the Amphibians of Venezuela: Illustrated and Annotated Species List, Distribution, and Conservation 1,2César L

    Mannophryne vulcano, Male carrying tadpoles. El Ávila (Parque Nacional Guairarepano), Distrito Federal. Photo: Jose Vieira. We want to dedicate this work to some outstanding individuals who encouraged us, directly or indirectly, and are no longer with us. They were colleagues and close friends, and their friendship will remain for years to come. César Molina Rodríguez (1960–2015) Erik Arrieta Márquez (1978–2008) Jose Ayarzagüena Sanz (1952–2011) Saúl Gutiérrez Eljuri (1960–2012) Juan Rivero (1923–2014) Luis Scott (1948–2011) Marco Natera Mumaw (1972–2010) Official journal website: Amphibian & Reptile Conservation amphibian-reptile-conservation.org 13(1) [Special Section]: 1–198 (e180). Catalogue of the amphibians of Venezuela: Illustrated and annotated species list, distribution, and conservation 1,2César L. Barrio-Amorós, 3,4Fernando J. M. Rojas-Runjaic, and 5J. Celsa Señaris 1Fundación AndígenA, Apartado Postal 210, Mérida, VENEZUELA 2Current address: Doc Frog Expeditions, Uvita de Osa, COSTA RICA 3Fundación La Salle de Ciencias Naturales, Museo de Historia Natural La Salle, Apartado Postal 1930, Caracas 1010-A, VENEZUELA 4Current address: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Río Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Laboratório de Sistemática de Vertebrados, Av. Ipiranga 6681, Porto Alegre, RS 90619–900, BRAZIL 5Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas, Altos de Pipe, apartado 20632, Caracas 1020, VENEZUELA Abstract.—Presented is an annotated checklist of the amphibians of Venezuela, current as of December 2018. The last comprehensive list (Barrio-Amorós 2009c) included a total of 333 species, while the current catalogue lists 387 species (370 anurans, 10 caecilians, and seven salamanders), including 28 species not yet described or properly identified. Fifty species and four genera are added to the previous list, 25 species are deleted, and 47 experienced nomenclatural changes.
  • Species Delimitation, Patterns of Diversification and Historical Biogeography of the Neotropical Frog Genus Adenomera

    Species Delimitation, Patterns of Diversification and Historical Biogeography of the Neotropical Frog Genus Adenomera

    Journal of Biogeography (J. Biogeogr.) (2014) 41, 855–870 ORIGINAL Species delimitation, patterns of ARTICLE diversification and historical biogeography of the Neotropical frog genus Adenomera (Anura, Leptodactylidae) Antoine Fouquet1,2*, Carla Santana Cassini3,Celio Fernando Baptista Haddad3, Nicolas Pech4 and Miguel Trefaut Rodrigues2 1CNRS Guyane USR3456, 97300 Cayenne, ABSTRACT French Guiana, 2Departamento de Zoologia, Aim For many taxa, inaccuracy of species boundaries and distributions Instituto de Bioci^encias, Universidade de S~ao hampers inferences about diversity and evolution. This is particularly true in Paulo, CEP 05508-090 S~ao Paulo, SP, Brazil, 3Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de the Neotropics where prevalence of cryptic species has often been demon- Bioci^encias, Universidade Estadual Paulista strated. The frog genus Adenomera is suspected to harbour many more species Julio de Mesquita Filho, CEP 13506-900 Rio than the 16 currently recognized. These small terrestrial species occur in Claro, SP, Brazil, 4Aix-Marseille Universite, Amazonia, Atlantic Forest (AF), and in the open formations of the Dry Diagonal CNRS, IRD, UMR 7263 – IMBE, Evolution (DD: Chaco, Cerrado and Caatinga). This widespread and taxonomically com- Genome Environnement, 13331 Marseille plex taxon provides a good opportunity to (1) test species boundaries, and (2) Cedex 3, France investigate historical connectivity between Amazonia and the AF and associated patterns of diversification. Location Tropical South America east of the Andes. Methods We used molecular data (four loci) to estimate phylogenetic rela- tionships among 320 Adenomera samples. These results were integrated with other lines of evidence to propose a conservative species delineation. We subse- quently used an extended dataset (seven loci) and investigated ancestral area distributions, dispersal–vicariance events, and the temporal pattern of diversifi- cation within Adenomera.
  • Chromosome Evolution in Three Brazilian Leptodactylus Species

    Chromosome Evolution in Three Brazilian Leptodactylus Species

    Hereditas 146: 104Á111 (2009) Chromosome evolution in three Brazilian Leptodactylus species (Anura, Leptodactylidae), with phylogenetic considerations JOA˜ O REINALDO CRUZ CAMPOS1, FERNANDO ANANIAS2, CINTHIA AGUIRRE BRASILEIRO3, MARCOS YAMAMOTO4,CE´ LIO FERNANDO BAPTISTA HADDAD1 and SANAE KASAHARA1 1Instituto de Biocieˆncias, Univ. Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Rio Claro, SP, Brasil 2Univ.Sa˜o Francisco, Braganc¸a Paulista, SP, Brasil 3Museu de Histo´ria Natural, UNICAMP, Campinas, SP, Brasil 4Depto do Meio Ambiente, Votorantim Celulose e Papel S/A, Santa Branca, SP, Brasil Campos, J. R. C., Ananias, F., Brasileiro, C. A., Yamamoto, M., Haddad, C. F. B. and Kasahara, S. 2009. Chromosome evolution in three Brazilian Leptodactylus species (Anura, Leptodactylidae), with phylogenetic considerations. * Hereditas 0146: 104Á111. Lund, Sweden. eISSN 1601-5223. Received September 29, 2008. Accepted December 22, 2008 Karyotypic analyses on three species of the Leptodactylus from Brazil showed 2n24 in L.cf.marmoratus,2n23 in Leptodactylus sp. (aff. bokermanni), and 2n26 in L. hylaedactylus, with distinct numbers of bi and uni-armed chromosomes. Leptodactylus cf. marmoratus presented a variation as regard to the morphology of pair 12. All specimens of L.cf.marmoratus had Ag-NOR in pair 6, confirmed by FISH, but the sample from one of the localities presented additional Ag-NOR, in one of the chromosomes 8. In Leptodactylus sp. (aff. bokermanni) and L. hylaedactylus the chromosome pairs bearing Ag-NOR are 11 and 7, respectively. The C banding patterns are predominantly centromeric, but only in L. marmoratus this heterochromatin appeared very brilliant with DAPI. On the other hand, bright labelling was noticed with CMA3 in the three species, on the Ag-NOR site.
  • Anura, Leptodactylidae)

    Anura, Leptodactylidae)

    UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL PAULISTA “JÚLIO DE MESQUITA FILHO” unesp INSTITUTO DE BIOCIÊNCIAS – RIO CLARO PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM CIÊNCIAS BIOLÓGICAS (ZOOLOGIA) Diversidade e evolução do gênero Adenomera Steindachner, 1867 (Anura, Leptodactylidae) CARLA SANTANA CASSINI Tese apresentada ao Instituto de Biociências do Campus de Rio Claro, Universidade Estadual Paulista, como parte dos requisitos para obtenção do título de Doutora em Ciências Biológicas (Área de concentração Zoologia). Março - 2015 CARLA SANTANA CASSINI Diversidade e evolução do gênero Adenomera Steindachner, 1867 (Anura, Leptodactylidae) Orientador: Célio Fernando Baptista Haddad Tese apresentada ao Instituto de Biociências do Câmpus de Rio Claro, Universidade Estadual Paulista, como parte dos requisitos para obtenção do título de Doutora em Ciências Biológicas (Área de concentração Zoologia). Março 2015 CARLA SANTANA CASSINI Diversidade e evolução do gênero Adenomera Steindachner, 1867 (Anura, Leptodactylidae) COMISSÃO EXAMINADORA ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ Rio Claro, 30 de março de 2015. Março 2015 “This is ourselves Under pressure” (Queen, 1981) AGRADECIMENTOS Este trabalho só se concretizou porque ao longo dos anos pude contar com a preciosa ajuda de várias pessoas, às quais agradeço sinceramente: Ao meu orientador Célio pela oportunidade concedida, pelo exemplo profissional e pela confiança depositada em mim. À minha família, Sérvio, Vanira e Pedro pelo estímulo constante e apoio incondicional para que eu seguisse a carreira acadêmica. Aos curadores das coleções José Pombal Júnior, Paulo Garcia, Mirco Solé, Hussam Zaher, Taran Grant e Julián Faivovich pelo empréstimo de tecidos e exemplares sob seus cuidados, sem os quais não este projeto não teria sido viável. Ao Axel Kwet pela atenção nos e-mails e pelos cantos cedidos para análise dos holótipos de A.
  • Species Diversity and Conservation Status of Amphibians in Madre De Dios, Southern Peru

    Species Diversity and Conservation Status of Amphibians in Madre De Dios, Southern Peru

    Herpetological Conservation and Biology 4(1):14-29 Submitted: 18 December 2007; Accepted: 4 August 2008 SPECIES DIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF AMPHIBIANS IN MADRE DE DIOS, SOUTHERN PERU 1,2 3 4,5 RUDOLF VON MAY , KAREN SIU-TING , JENNIFER M. JACOBS , MARGARITA MEDINA- 3 6 3,7 1 MÜLLER , GIUSEPPE GAGLIARDI , LILY O. RODRÍGUEZ , AND MAUREEN A. DONNELLY 1 Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, 11200 SW 8th Street, OE-167, Miami, Florida 33199, USA 2 Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] 3 Departamento de Herpetología, Museo de Historia Natural de la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Avenida Arenales 1256, Lima 11, Perú 4 Department of Biology, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Avenue, San Francisco, California 94132, USA 5 Department of Entomology, California Academy of Sciences, 55 Music Concourse Drive, San Francisco, California 94118, USA 6 Departamento de Herpetología, Museo de Zoología de la Universidad Nacional de la Amazonía Peruana, Pebas 5ta cuadra, Iquitos, Perú 7 Programa de Desarrollo Rural Sostenible, Cooperación Técnica Alemana – GTZ, Calle Diecisiete 355, Lima 27, Perú ABSTRACT.—This study focuses on amphibian species diversity in the lowland Amazonian rainforest of southern Peru, and on the importance of protected and non-protected areas for maintaining amphibian assemblages in this region. We compared species lists from nine sites in the Madre de Dios region, five of which are in nationally recognized protected areas and four are outside the country’s protected area system. Los Amigos, occurring outside the protected area system, is the most species-rich locality included in our comparison.
  • Biologia De Anuros Biology of Anurans 26 (Sapos, Rãs, Jias E Pererecas) (Frogs, Toads and Treefrogs)

    Biologia De Anuros Biology of Anurans 26 (Sapos, Rãs, Jias E Pererecas) (Frogs, Toads and Treefrogs)

    Copyright © 2008 by Albertina P. Lima [et al.] Todos os direitos reservados. Coordenação editorial Albertina P. Lima Claudia Keller William E. Magnusson Capa, projeto gráfico, diagramação e produção Áttema Design Editorial • www.attema.com.br Fotos Dos autores. Exceto a foto de Phrynohyas resinifictrix (D)de autoria de Benjamim B. da Luz, com o auxílio de Luciana K. Erdtmann e a foto de Chiasmocleis shudikarensis (D)de autoria de Selvino Neckel-Oliveira. Filmagens Karl S. Mokross, exceto a filmagem da espécie Trachycephalus resinifictrix de autoria de Olivier Jauboin e Ceratophrys cornuta de autoria de Vicky Flechas. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia – INPA Diretor: Adalberto Luis Val Ficha catalográfica elaborada pela Biblioteca do Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia Guia de sapos da Reserva Adolpho Ducke, Amazônia Central = Guide to the frogs of Reserva Adolpho Ducke, Central Amazonia / Albertina Pimentel Lima ...[et al.]. – Manaus : Áttema Design Editorial, 2008. 1 CD-ROM ; color. ; (4 ¾ pol.). ISBN: 978-85-99387-04-7 1. Herpetologia. 2. Anfíbios Anuros. 3. Reserva Adolpho Ducke. 4. Pimentel Lima, Albertina CDD - 597.8 Bibliotecária: CRB Rua Leonor Teles, 271-b • Conjunto Abílio Nery • Adrianópolis CEP 69.060-001 • Manaus • AM • Brasil Tel.: 55 (92) 3642.2754 • Tel./Fax: 55 (92) 3642.0004 • [email protected] www.attema.com.br How to use this Guide Guide to the Frogs of Reserva Adolpho Ducke Prefácio Preface ais de dois séculos se passaram ore than two centuries have desde que a Ciência descobriu passed since scientists first a riqueza biológica da Bacia became aware of the rich Amazônica. Exploradores natu- biota of the Amazon Basin.
  • Species Limits, and Evolutionary History of Glassfrogs

    Species Limits, and Evolutionary History of Glassfrogs

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athematical representation is inevitably simplistic, and occasionally one has to be brutal in forcing it to suit a reality that can only be very complex. And yet, there is a beauty about trees because of the simplicity with which they allow you to describe a series of events […]. But one must ask whether one is justified simplifying reality to the extent necessary to represent it as a tree. Cavalli-Sforza, Genes, People, and Languages (2001) The universe is no narrow thing and the order within it is not constrained by any latitude in is conception to repeat what exists in one part in any other part. Even in this world more things exist
  • On the Uncertain Taxonomic Identity of Adenomera Hylaedactyla (Cope, 1868) and the Composite Type Series of A

    On the Uncertain Taxonomic Identity of Adenomera Hylaedactyla (Cope, 1868) and the Composite Type Series of A

    Copeia 107, No. 4, 2019, 708–723 On the Uncertain Taxonomic Identity of Adenomera hylaedactyla (Cope, 1868) and the Composite Type Series of A. andreae (Muller,¨ 1923) (Anura, Leptodactylidae) Thiago R. de Carvalho1, Ariovaldo A. Giaretta2, Natan M. Maciel3, Diego A. Barrera4,Cesar´ Aguilar-Puntriano4,5,Celio´ F. B. Haddad1, Marcelo N. C. Kokubum6, Marcelo Menin7, and Ariadne Angulo4,5 Adenomera andreae and A. hylaedactyla are two widespread Amazonian frogs that have been traditionally distinguished from each other by the use of different habitats, toe tip development, and more recently through advertisement calls. Yet, taxonomic identification of these species has always been challenging. Herein we undertake a review of type specimens and include new phenotypic (morphology and vocalization) and mitochondrial DNA information for an updated diagnosis of both species. Our morphological analysis indicates that the single type (holotype) of A. hylaedactyla could either belong to lineages associated with Amazonian forest-dwelling species (A. andreae clade) or to the open-formation morphotype (A. hylaedactyla clade). Given the holotype’s poor preservation, leading to the ambiguous assignment of character states for toe tip development, as well as a vague type locality encompassing a vast area in eastern Ecuador and northern Peru, the identity of this specimen is uncertain. Morphology of toe tip fragments and the original species description suggest that A. hylaedactyla could correspond to at least two described species (A. andreae or A. simonstuarti) or additional unnamed genetic lineages of the A. andreae clade, all bearing toe tips expanded into discs. Analysis of morphometric data, however, clustered the holotype with the Amazonian open-formation morphotype (toe tips unexpanded).

  • Amphibians of Santa Teresa, Brazil: the Hotspot Further Evaluated

    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 857: 139–162 (2019)Amphibians of Santa Teresa, Brazil: the hotspot further evaluated 139 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.857.30302 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Amphibians of Santa Teresa, Brazil: the hotspot further evaluated Rodrigo Barbosa Ferreira1,2, Alexander Tamanini Mônico1,3, Emanuel Teixeira da Silva4,5, Fernanda Cristina Ferreira Lirio1, Cássio Zocca1,3, Marcio Marques Mageski1, João Filipe Riva Tonini6,7, Karen H. Beard2, Charles Duca1, Thiago Silva-Soares3 1Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia de Ecossistemas, Universidade Vila Velha, Campus Boa Vista, 29102-920, Vila Velha, ES, Brazil 2 Department of Wildland Resources and the Ecology Center, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA 3Instituto Nacional da Mata Atlântica/Museu de Biologia Prof. Mello Leitão, 29650-000, Santa Teresa, ES, Brazil 4 Laboratório de Herpetologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Avenida Antônio Carlos, 6627, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil 5 Centro de Estudos em Biologia, Centro Universitário de Caratinga, Avenida Niterói, s/n, Bairro Nossa Senhora das Graças, 35300-000, Caratinga, MG, Brazil 6 Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford St, Cambridge, MA, USA 7 Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford St, Cambridge, MA, USA Corresponding author: Rodrigo Barbosa Ferreira ([email protected]) Academic editor: A. Crottini | Received 4 October 2018 | Accepted 20 April 2019 | Published 25 June 2019 http://zoobank.org/1923497F-457B-43BA-A852-5B58BEB42CC1 Citation: Ferreira RB, Mônico AT, da Silva ET, Lirio FCF, Zocca C, Mageski MM, Tonini JFR, Beard KH, Duca C, Silva-Soares T (2019) Amphibians of Santa Teresa, Brazil: the hotspot further evaluated.
  • Planeación Ambiental Para La Conservación De La Biodiversidad En Las Áreas Operativas De Ecopetrol: Informe Final Ventana Snsm, Ciénaga, Magdalena

    Planeación Ambiental Para La Conservación De La Biodiversidad En Las Áreas Operativas De Ecopetrol: Informe Final Ventana Snsm, Ciénaga, Magdalena

    PLANEACIÓN AMBIENTAL PARA LA CONSERVACIÓN DE LA BIODIVERSIDAD EN LAS ÁREAS OPERATIVAS DE ECOPETROL: INFORME FINAL VENTANA SNSM, CIÉNAGA, MAGDALENA. MAYO DE 2015 i INFORME FINAL LOS GRUPOS ANALIZADOS. DEL CONVENIO DE COOPERACIÓN NO. 14-12-067-001CE SUSCRITO ENTRE EL INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIÓN DE RECURSOS BIOLÓGICOS ALEXANDER VON HUMBOLDT Y EL PROYECTO DE CONSERVACIÓN DE AGUAS Y TIERRAS COLOMBIA – PROCAT COLOMBIA. ProCAT Colombia Instituto de Investigación de Recursos José F. González-Maya Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt Director Brigitte Baptiste Ballera Directora General Mauricio González German Corzo Subdirector Administrativo Supervisor Convenio I. Mauricio Vela-Vargas Javier Barriga Coordinador de País Coordinador de Campo Juan S. Jiménez-Alvarado Coordinadora de Investigación Coordinador de Investigación Juan David Valencia Caterine Rodríguez Catalina Moreno-Díaz Omar Velandia Sofía Fajardo Luis Mórelo Investigadores de campo BOGOTÁ, COLOMBIA ii PLANEACIÓN AMBIENTAL PARA LA CONSERVACIÓN DE LA BIODIVERSIDAD EN LAS ÁREAS OPERATIVAS DE ECOPETROL: INFORME FINAL VENTANA SNSM, CIÉNAGA, MAGDALENA. Autores Juan S. Jiménez-Alvarado*, Caterine Rodríguez*, J. David Valencia-Mazo*, Omar Velandia*, Sofía Fajardo*, Luis Morelo*, Catalina Moreno-Díaz*, I. Mauricio Vela-Vargas*, José F. González-Maya*. * Proyecto de Conservación de Aguas y Tierras - ProCAT Colombia Fotografías Portada: Federico Pardo. Cítese como: Juan S. Jiménez-Alvarado, Rodríguez C, Valencia-Mazo JD, Velandia O, Fajardo S, Morelo L, Moreno-Díaz C, Vela-Vargas IM, González-Maya JF. 2015. PLANEACIÓN AMBIENTAL PARA LA CONSERVACIÓN DE LA BIODIVERSIDAD EN LAS ÁREAS OPERATIVAS DE ECOPETROL: INFORME FINAL VENTANA SNSM, CIÉNAGA, MAGDALENA. Informe Técnico Final. Proyecto de Conservación de Aguas y Tierras – ProCAT Colombia, The Sierra To Sea Institute, Instituto de investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt.
  • Crested Quetzal (Pharomachrus Antisianus) Preying on a Glassfrog (Anura, Centrolenidae) in Sierra De Perijá, Northwestern Venezuela

    Crested Quetzal (Pharomachrus Antisianus) Preying on a Glassfrog (Anura, Centrolenidae) in Sierra De Perijá, Northwestern Venezuela

    Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia, 22(4), 419-421 SHORTCOMMUNICATION December 2014 Crested Quetzal (Pharomachrus antisianus) preying on a Glassfrog (Anura, Centrolenidae) in Sierra de Perijá, northwestern Venezuela Marcial Quiroga-Carmona1,3 and Adrián Naveda-Rodríguez2 1 Centro de Ecología, Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas, Caracas 1020-A, Apartado 2032, Venezuela. 2 The Peregrine Fund, 5668 West Flying Hawk Lane, Boise, ID 83709, U.S.A. 3 Corresponding author: [email protected] Received on 17 September 2014. Accepted on 8 November 2014. ABSTRACT: We report the predation of a glassfrog (Hyalinobatrachium pallidum) by a Crested Quetzal (Pharomachrus antisianus). The record was made in a locality in the Sierra de Perijá, near to the northern part of the border between Colombia and Venezuela, and consisted in observinga male P. antisianus vocalizing with a glassfrog in its bill. The vocalizations were answered by a female, which approached the male, took the frog with its bill and carried it into a cavity built on a landslide. Subsequent to this, the male remained near to the cavity until the female left it and together they abandoned this place. Based on the behavior observed in the couple of quetzals, and what has previously been described that this group of birds gives their young a diet rich in animal protein comprised of arthropods and small vertebrates, we believe that the couple was raising a brood at the time when the observation was carried out. KEYWORDS: Anurophagy, diet, Hyalinobatrachium, Trogonidae, Trogoniformes. The consumption of animal protein is a behavior a behavior also reported for P. pavoninus (Lebbin 2007) exhibited by most of the species of the family Trogonidae.
  • By the Wandering Spider Ctenus Ornatus (Araneae: Ctenidae) in Southeastern Brazil

    By the Wandering Spider Ctenus Ornatus (Araneae: Ctenidae) in Southeastern Brazil

    Herpetology Notes, volume 8: 329-330 (2015) (published online on 16 June 2015) Predation on the tropical bullfrog Adenomera marmorata (Anura: Leptodactylidae) by the wandering spider Ctenus ornatus (Araneae: Ctenidae) in southeastern Brazil Lucas Coutinho Amaral¹,*, Pedro de Souza Castanheira², Sergio Potsch de Carvalho-e-Silva¹ and Renner Luiz Cerqueira Baptista² Anurans are common preys to some species of spiders tiny middle eyes and two large posterior eyes (Jocqué (Menin et al., 2005). Not only adults (e.g., Barej et al., and Dippenaar-Schoeman, 2006). Ctenids are nocturnal 2005), but also tadpoles are preyed on by spiders (e.g., hunters, running mainly on the leaf litter. They use mainly Folly et al., 2014a; Luiz et al., 2013). The frog species vibration and visual contact to locate prey, catching and Adenomera marmorata Steindachner, 1867, occurs in killing them with their powerful poison, delivered by the the Atlantic Rain Forest in southeastern Brazil, from fangs of their strong chelicerae (Jocqué and Dippenaar- Rio de Janeiro to Santa Catarina states (Frost, 2015), Schoeman, 2006). Ctenus ornatus (Keyserling, 1877) is and is one of the most abundant amphibian species in a large and very common ground spider in the Atlantic the leaf-litter (Heyer et al., 1990; Rocha et al., 2007). It Forest, distributed from Pernambuco state, in Northeast, is mostly a nocturnal frog, but males can also be heard to Goiás state, in the West, both in Brazil, to Misiones, at anytime of the day during rainy days (Izecksohn and Argentina (Brescovit and Simó, 2007). Carvalho-e-Silva, 2001). Males call from chambers The following event was observed during a dug in the ground, where the females lay their eggs herpetological field work at approximately 07:30 pm embedded in foam nests (Izecksohn and Carvalho-e- on 10 August, 2014, at the Centro Marista São José Silva, 2001).