Declaration of Independence.” — Abraham Lincoln

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

GO TO MASTER INDEX OF WARFARE AFTER THE VARIOUS DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCY WHAT LED UP TO THE DECLARATION “I know of no country in which there is so little true independence of mind and freedom of discussion as in America.” — Alexis de Tocqueville “I have never had a feeling politically that did not spring from the sentiments embodied in the Declaration of Independence.” — Abraham Lincoln “We want a country which shall not brand the Declaration of Independence as a lie.” — Frederick Douglass BEFORE THE DECLARATION “NARRATIVE HISTORY” AMOUNTS TO FABULATION, THE REAL STUFF BEING MERE CHRONOLOGY “Stack of the Artist of Kouroo” Project After the Declaration of War HDT WHAT? INDEX AFTER THE DECLARATION OF WAR INDEPENDENCY GO TO MASTER INDEX OF WARFARE 1777 James Madison, Jr. lost his seat in the Virginia House of Delegates, seemingly because he was cheap about treating the voters to the usual whiskey. Never mind, later that year he was elected to the 8-member Council of State. The Reverend Ezra Stiles recorded in his diary1 after a meal with John Langdon, who had been a delegate from New Hampshire to the Continental Congress but had been replaced by William Whipple prior to the drafting of the Declaration of Independence, that he had “Dined in Company with Col. Langdon formerly of the Continental Congress. He says Mr. Jeffries of Virginia drafted the Declaration of Independency.” (The confusion about Thomas Jefferson’s name indicates that Langdon, as well as Stiles, is a hearsay source for this allegation.) If you had asked any of these people at that time, which was the more important document, this declaration or the Articles of Incorporation, there is little doubt but that the response you would have received would have 1. Dexter, Franklin Bowditch, ed., THE LITERARY DIARY OF EZRA STILES. NY, 1901, Volume II, page 155 VIEW VOLUME ONE VIEW VOLUME TWO VIEW VOLUME THREE HDT WHAT? INDEX AFTER THE DECLARATION OF WAR INDEPENDENCY GO TO MASTER INDEX OF WARFARE been “Why, the Articles of Incorporation, of course.” NOBODY COULD GUESS WHAT WOULD HAPPEN NEXT “Stack of the Artist of Kouroo” Project After the Declaration of War HDT WHAT? INDEX AFTER THE DECLARATION OF WAR INDEPENDENCY GO TO MASTER INDEX OF WARFARE Near the hamlet of Thunderbolt outside Savannah, Georgia, alpha-male signer of the Declaration of Independence and Georgia slavemaster Button Gwinett met alpha-male revolutionary Brigadier General and Georgia slavemaster Lacklan McIntosh for a duel with pistols at 12 paces (approximately 60 feet). Both men were hit in the leg. Gwinett would die of gangrene and McIntosh would be charged with murder, but acquitted. Anglo-Irish aristocrats agreed upon a detailed “Clonmel Code” for their gentlemanly duels. Among this code’s 26 bullet points were: • Acceptable reasons for issuing a challenge included being accused of cheating at cards or horse races, being accused of having insulted a lady, and having been subjected to a blow of the fist. • Challenges might not be delivered during hours of darkness. • The challenger had the right to choose the weapon but the other party might decline the sword in favor of the pistol (pistols would be usual in Britain but swords would be popular in Europe through WWII). • Pistols had to be of a matched set loaded in the presence of the seconds. The owner of a set of pistols was to favor the other principal with first choice. • Misfires, snaps, and half-cocks amounted to shots, and it was prohibited to intentionally discharge a weapon into the ground or air. • Ranges were upon agreement and might vary between 4 and 20 yards. • It was the responsibility of the seconds to attempt to dissuade the principals, not only before a duel but after each firing. HDT WHAT? INDEX AFTER THE DECLARATION OF WAR INDEPENDENCY GO TO MASTER INDEX OF WARFARE GO TO MASTER INDEX OF WARFARE January 3, Friday: People were trying to kill each other at Princeton in New Jersey, with the American irregulars taking nearly a couple of hundred of prisoners. Hey, looks like it’s gonna be reasonably safe to publish the names of the signatories to our Declaration of Independence! (Although the dates of the signatures ranged from August 2, 1776 to sometime in November of 1776, depending on when each delegate had gotten around to signing it, for safety’s sake the signed version of the document had been being held top secret.) January 18, Saturday: At this point, with the difficult military campaign of 1776 behind them and with victories obtained at Trenton and at Princeton, the members of the 2nd Continental Congress decided that it would be reasonably safe for them personally, to send out to the several states the authenticated copies of their Declaration of Independence as it had been signed by all the delegates in confirmation of their we-will-all- hang-together-or-separately unity. Initially these parchment copies “with the names of the members ... subscribing the same” had been held secret for their personal protection: They were not...given to throwing their fate into God’s hands needlessly. HDT WHAT? INDEX AFTER THE DECLARATION OF WAR INDEPENDENCY GO TO MASTER INDEX OF WARFARE The secret signatories had included, among others, for instance, as it turned out, Dr. Josiah Bartlett (1729- 1795) of Kingston, New Hampshire, the 2d to appear on the face of the prettified document: It was Mary Katherine Goddard who was authorized to issue this 1st printed copy of the Declaration document HDT WHAT? INDEX AFTER THE DECLARATION OF WAR INDEPENDENCY GO TO MASTER INDEX OF WARFARE which included the names of all its signers. CONTINENTAL CONGRESS Our national birthday, Friday the 4th of July: When the first 4th-of-July commemorative B’day bash was staged, in 1777, what was being celebrated on the 4th was what had happened on the 2nd. The celebration that year didn’t have anything much to do with any formal Declaration of Independence document that had been in process as of the 4th in the previous year, but rather, it had to do with the actual political act, the declaration (lower-case “d”) of our independence (lower-case “i”), which is to say, it had to do with the critical vote which had succeeded on July 2, 1776. The problem was simply that in this year 1777, nobody was yet thinking much in advance — and so it had taken a couple of days to organize the idea of having a celebration.2 In those early years you won’t find any suggestions being made, that the document was a particularly powerful one, or a fine piece of writing. When people quoted from the propaganda broadside, very commonly what they 2. Later on, of course, the forces of historical rectification took over, and some apologist or other swept the pieces of the story together creatively and invented a plausible reason why we have been celebrating our national B’day on the 4th — and that, kiddies, is how the Declaration of Independence, a political broadside, got substituted for our declaration of independence, an act of defiance. Although the Declaration of Independence was probably not signed on the evening of the 4th as Thomas Jefferson would insist it had been, having probably been already approved that morning and lain aside, with the signing of a handscripted parchment copy not beginning until a later timeframe, we have all decided to pretend that it was signed on the 4th because that pretense legitimates our habitually popping off with imitation gunfire and the rockets red glare as of the 4th. There are several good reasons why there have been no objections to this false story our Jeffersons were creating. First, according to Pauline Maier on page 184, his fabrication was at the time merely “entrusted to private letters” rather than being broadcast to people who might have challenged it, and second, he was doing this historical reconstruction only after in the case of many of the participants “death had sealed their lips.” HDT WHAT? INDEX AFTER THE DECLARATION OF WAR INDEPENDENCY GO TO MASTER INDEX OF WARFARE quoted were not words from the Committee of Five’s early draft, but words in the final paragraph that had been offered by the Continental Congress acting as a Committee of the Whole, words such as “absolved of all allegiance to the British Crown,” and “are and of right ought to be free and independent states.” The bulk of the document was easily dismissed at the time as yet another mean-spirited “recapitulation of injuries”: Considering how revered a position the Declaration of Independence later won in the hearts and minds of the American people ... disregard for it in the earliest years of the new nation verges on the incredible. It was as if that document had done its work in carrying news of Independence to the people, and neither needed nor deserved further consideration. The festivities included no praise of Thomas Jefferson. CONTINETAL CONGRESS One thing to bear in mind is that, just as there wasn’t just this one copy of this particular Declaration of Independence, also there wasn’t just one such Declaration of Independence. We presently know of at least ninety discrete, different examples of this peculiar art form, and if we had any reason to dig further, surely we could produce record of some more. For instance, according to Lemuel Shattuck’s HISTORY OF ... CONCORD, there was a Declaration of Independence from British colonial rule issued by the town government of Acton MA on June 14th, 1776. Where is it now? –Presumably in the Reserve Book Room of the Acton Public Library, or maybe hanging on the wall.
Recommended publications
  • Henry Thoreau, from Which He Would Obtain Plutarch Materials Plus Quotes from Crates of Thebes and Simonides’S “Epigram on Anacreon” That He Would Recycle in a WEEK.)

    Henry Thoreau, from Which He Would Obtain Plutarch Materials Plus Quotes from Crates of Thebes and Simonides’S “Epigram on Anacreon” That He Would Recycle in a WEEK.)

    HDT WHAT? INDEX 1814 1814 EVENTS OF 1813 General Events of 1814 SPRING JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH SUMMER APRIL MAY JUNE FALL JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER WINTER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER Following the death of Jesus Christ there was a period of readjustment that lasted for approximately one million years. –Kurt Vonnegut, THE SIRENS OF TITAN THE NEW-ENGLAND ALMANACK FOR 1814. By Isaac Bickerstaff. Providence, Rhode Island: John Carter. THE NEW-ENGLAND ALMANACK FOR 1814. By Isaac Bickerstaff. Providence: John Carter. Sold also by George Wanton, Newport. 21-year-old Edward Hitchcock calculated and published a COUNTRY ALMANAC (recalculated and reissued each year to 1818). John Farmer’s “A Sketch of Amherst, New Hampshire” (2 COLL. MASS. HIST. SOC. II. BOSTON). Noah Webster, Esq. became a member of the Massachusetts General Court (he would serve also in 1815 and 1817). Carl Phillip Gottfried von Clausewitz was reinstated in the Prussian army. EVENTS OF 1815 HDT WHAT? INDEX 1814 1814 The 2d of 3 volumes of a revised critical edition of an old warhorse, ANTHOLOGIA GRAECA AD FIDEM CODICIS OLIM PALATINI NUNC PARISINI EX APOGRAPHO GOTHANO EDITA ..., prepared by Christian Friedrich Wilhelm Jacobs, appeared in Leipzig (the initial volume had appeared in 1813 and the final volume would appear in 1817). ANTHOLOGIA GRAECA (My working assumption, for which I have no evidence, is that this is likely to have been the unknown edition consulted by Henry Thoreau, from which he would obtain Plutarch materials plus quotes from Crates of Thebes and Simonides’s “Epigram
  • The Essential Rothbard

    The Essential Rothbard

    THE ESSENTIAL ROTHBARD THE ESSENTIAL ROTHBARD DAVID GORDON Ludwig von Mises Institute AUBURN, ALABAMA Copyright © 2007 Ludwig von Mises Institute All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any man- ner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of reprints in the context of reviews. For information write the Ludwig von Mises Institute, 518 West Magnolia Avenue, Auburn, Alabama 36832 U.S.A.; www.mises.org. ISBN: 10 digit: 1-933550-10-4 ISBN: 13 digit: 978-1-933550-10-7 CONTENTS Introduction . 7 The Early Years—Becoming a Libertarian . 9 Man, Economy, and State: Rothbard’s Treatise on Economic Theory . 14 Power and Market: The Final Part of Rothbard’s Treatise . 22 More Advances in Economic Theory: The Logic of Action . 26 Rothbard on Money: The Vindication of Gold . 36 Austrian Economic History . 41 A Rothbardian View of American History . 55 The Unknown Rothbard: Unpublished Papers . 63 Rothbard’s System of Ethics . 87 Politics in Theory and Practice . 94 Rothbard on Current Economic Issues . 109 Rothbard’s Last Scholarly Triumph . 113 Followers and Influence . 122 Bibliography . 125 Index . 179 5 INTRODUCTION urray N. Rothbard, a scholar of extraordinary range, made major contributions to economics, history, politi- Mcal philosophy, and legal theory. He developed and extended the Austrian economics of Ludwig von Mises, in whose seminar he was a main participant for many years. He established himself as the principal Austrian theorist in the latter half of the twentieth century and applied Austrian analysis to topics such as the Great Depression of 1929 and the history of American bank- ing.
  • Imagination Movers: the Construction of Conservative Counter-Narratives in Reaction to Consensus Liberalism

    Imagination Movers: the Construction of Conservative Counter-Narratives in Reaction to Consensus Liberalism

    Imagination Movers: The Construction of Conservative Counter-Narratives in Reaction to Consensus Liberalism Seth James Bartee Dissertation submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In Social, Political, Ethical, and Cultural Thought Francois Debrix, Chair Matthew Gabriele Matthew Dallek James Garrison Timothy Luke February 19, 2014 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: conservatism, imagination, historicism, intellectual history counter-narrative, populism, traditionalism, paleo-conservatism Imagination Movers: The Construction of Conservative Counter-Narratives in Reaction to Consensus Liberalism Seth James Bartee ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to explore what exactly bound post-Second World War American conservatives together. Since modern conservatism’s recent birth in the United States in the last half century or more, many historians have claimed that both anti-communism and capitalism kept conservatives working in cooperation. My contention was that the intellectual founder of postwar conservatism, Russell Kirk, made imagination, and not anti-communism or capitalism, the thrust behind that movement in his seminal work The Conservative Mind. In The Conservative Mind, published in 1953, Russell Kirk created a conservative genealogy that began with English parliamentarian Edmund Burke. Using Burke and his dislike for the modern revolutionary spirit, Kirk uncovered a supposedly conservative seed that began in late eighteenth-century England, and traced it through various interlocutors into the United States that culminated in the writings of American expatriate poet T.S. Eliot. What Kirk really did was to create a counter-narrative to the American liberal tradition that usually began with the French Revolution and revolutionary figures such as English-American revolutionary Thomas Paine.
  • JTHG Corridor

    JTHG Corridor

    Journey Through Hallowed Ground A National Park Service scheme, run by a “socially-conscious” aristocracy, designed to radically transform a million acres of Virginia’s heartland and to impose the “appropriate” quality of life on people of the Piedmont. 2 © March, 2006, The Virginia Land Rights Coalition POB 85 McDowell, Virginia FOC 24458 540-396-6217 L. M. Schwartz, Chairman www.vlrc.org Reproduction or publication for any purpose or in any commercial media outlet, news source or internet site, either in full or partially, is strictly prohibited without written permission. Printed and bound copies of this report are available in color or black and white. Please inquire. For more information about preserving America’s Constitutionally protected Rights to Life, Liberty and Property, call, write or visit our website. This report may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information, see: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml “Everyone should do all in his power to collect and disseminate the truth, in hope that truth may find a place in history and descend to posterity. History is not the relating of campaigns and battles, and generals or other individuals, but that which shows principles. The principles for which the South contended were government by the people; that is, government by the consent of the governed, government limited and local, free of consolidated power.
  • An Austro-Libertarian View, Vol. III

    An Austro-Libertarian View, Vol. III

    An Austro-Libertarian View, Vol. III An Austro-Libertarian View ESSAYS BY DAVID GORDON VOLUME III CURRENT AFFAIRS • FOREIGN POLICY AMERICAN HISTORY • EUROPEAN HISTORY Mises Institute 518 West Magnolia Avenue Auburn, Alabama 36832-4501 334.321.2100 www.mises.org An Austro-Libertarian View: Essays by David Gordon. Vol. III: Current Affairs, Foreign Policy, American History, European History. Published 2017 by the Mises Institute. This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommerical-NoDerivs 4.0 Interna- tional License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. ISBN: 978-1-61016-673-7 Table of Contents by Chapter Titles Preface . xiii Foreword . 1 Current Affairs A Propensity to Self-Subversion . 5 “Social Security and Its Discontents” . 9 Achieving Our Country: Leftist Thought in 20th-Century America . 11 The Irrepressible Rothbard: The Rothbard-Rockwell Report Essays of Murray N. Rothbard . 17 While America Sleeps: Self-Delusion, Military Weakness, and the Threat to Peace Today . 23 The War Over Iraq: Saddam’s Tyranny and America’s Mission . 29 Why We Fight: Moral Clarity and the War on Terrorism . 35 Speaking of Liberty . 39 Against Leviathan: Government Power and a Free Society . 45 No Victory, No Peace . 51 Resurgence of the Warfare State: The Crisis Since 9/11 . 57 In Our Hands: A Plan to Replace the Welfare State . 63 World War IV: The Long Struggle Against Islamofascism . 71 Radicals for Capitalism: A Freewheeling History of the Modern American Libertarian Movement . 77 The Meaning of Sarkozy . 85 The Power Problem: How American Military Dominance Makes Us Less Safe, Less Prosperous, and Less Free .
  • Making Economic Sense.Pdf

    Making Economic Sense.Pdf

    Making Economic Sense 2nd Edition Murray N. Rothbard Ludwig von Mises Institute AUBURN, ALABAMA Copyright © 1995, 2006 by the Ludwig von Mises Institute All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of reprints in the context of reviews. For information write the Ludwig von Mises Institute, 518 West Magnolia Avenue, Auburn, Alabama 36832. ISBN: 0-945466-46-3 CONTENTS Preface by Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr. .xi Introduction to the Second Edition by Robert P. Murphy . .xiii MAKING ECONOMIC SENSE 1 Is It the “Economy, Stupid”? . .3 2 Ten Great Economic Myths . .7 3 Discussing the “Issues” . .19 4 Creative Economic Semantics . .23 5 Chaos Theory: Destroying Mathematical Economics From Within? . .25 6 Statistics: Destroyed From Within? . .28 7 The Consequences of Human Action: Intended or Unintended? . .31 8 The Interest Rate Question . .33 9 Are Savings Too Low? . .37 10 A Walk on the Supply Side . .40 11 Keynesian Myths . .43 12 Keynesianism Redux . .45 v vi Making Economic Sense THE SOCIALISM OF WELFARE 13 Economic Incentives and Welfare . .53 14 Welfare as We Don’t Know It . .56 15 The Infant Mortality “Crisis” . .58 16 The Homeless and the Hungry . .62 17 Rioting for Rage, Fun, and Profit . .64 18 The Social Security Swindle . .68 19 Roots of the Insurance Crisis . .71 20 Government Medical “Insurance” . .74 21 The Neocon Welfare State . .77 22 By Their Fruits . .81 23 The Politics of Famine . .84 24 Government vs. Natural Resources . .87 25 Environmentalists Clobber Texas . .89 26 Government and Hurricane Hugo: A Deadly Combination .
  • The Consequences of Ideas: a (Prospective) Life of Richard Weaver Jay Langdale the “Legitimate Function of Modern Biography

    The Consequences of Ideas: a (Prospective) Life of Richard Weaver Jay Langdale the “Legitimate Function of Modern Biography

    The Consequences of Ideas: A (Prospective) Life of Richard Weaver Jay Langdale The “legitimate function of modern biography,” the twentieth-century libertarian Albert J. Nock notes, is “to help the historian.” This, he observes, is at odds with the general impression that “it begins with [one man’s] birth, ends with his death, and includes every single detail of historical significance.”1 The southern conservative Richard Malcolm Weaver (1917-1963), who was Nock’s intellectual contemporary, remains someone whose life story stands to aid the historian of modern American intellectual history and, especially, the historian of modern American conservatism. Weaver’s life story is predominately the tale of a native North Carolinian who, depending on one’s perspective, either converted or segued from Marxism to southern traditionalist conservatism. On the significance of the latter persuasion, Eugene Genovese, who knew a thing or two about such a transition, described southern conservatism as nothing less than “America’s most impressive native- born critique of our national development, of liberalism, and of the more disquieting features of the modern world.”2 As Genovese notes, a deep-seated anti-modernism lay at the center of this critique and Weaver, who memorably tells of his 1938 conversion in his essay “Up From Liberalism,” was something of the Apostle Paul of southern traditionalism.3 In short, Weaver remains the most important intellectual descendant of the Nashville Agrarians and, 1 Nock, “The Purpose of Biography” in The State of the Union: Essays in Social Criticism (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1991), 5. 2 Genovese, The Southern Tradition: The Achievement and Limitations of an American Conservatism (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1994), 1-2.
  • Theoretical Perspectives on Party Polarization in America

    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-19592-9 — Party Polarization in America B. Dan Wood , Soren Jordan Index More Information 1 Theoretical Perspectives on Party Polarization in America On February 28, 2012, Senator Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) announced her decision to retire after eighteen years in the U.S. Senate. Explaining her deci- sion, she said, I have spoken on the floor of the Senate for years about the dysfunction and political polarization in the institution. Simply put, the Senate is not living up to what the Founding Fathers envisioned ... During the Federal Convention of 1787, James Madison wrote in his Notes of Debates that “the use of the Senate is to consist in its proceedings with more coolness, with more system, and with more wisdom, than the popular branch.” ... Yet more than 200 years later, the greatest deliberative body in history is not living up to its billing ...everyone simply votes with their party and those in charge employ every possible tactic to block the other side. But that is not what America is all about, and it’s not what the Founders intended. (Madison 1787, June 7; Snowe 2012) Senator Snowe was not alone in her frustration with the polarization and dysfunction of the U.S. Congress. In the 2010 and 2012 election cycles, twenty-five senators and sixty-five House members either retired or resigned (Chamberlain 2012), with another seven senators and forty-one House members retiring in 2014 (Ballotpedia 2016). Many of these incumbents expressed sentiment similar to Senator Snowe’s. Referring to the poisonous nature of politics in Washington, Representative Steve Latourette (R-Ohio) stated, “I have reached the conclusion that the atmosphere today and the reality that exists in the House of Representatives no longer encourages the finding of common ground.” LaTourette told reporters that to rise in party ranks, politicians must now hand over “your wallet and your voting card” to party extremes, and he was uninterested (Helderman 2012).
  • The Corruption of American Conservatism

    The Corruption of American Conservatism

    The Corruption of American Conservatism Iskander Rehman December 2017 Cover photo credits: Jim Larkin/Shutterstock.com December 2017 THE CORRUPTION OF AMERICAN CONSERVATISM Iskander Rehman It is true that courtiers in America do not say ‘Sire’ and ‘Your Majesty’—a great and capital difference; but they speak constantly of the natural enlightenment of their master; they do not hold a competition on the question of knowing which one of the virtues of the prince most merits being admired; for they are sure that he possesses all the virtues, without having acquired them and so to speak without wanting to do so; they do not give them their wives and daughters so that he may deign to elevate them to the rank of their mistresses; but in sacrificing their opinions to him, they prostitute themselves. - Alexis de Tocqueville, On Democracy in America, Vol.I, Part 2, Chapter 7. n a sunny morning in January 1962, an to a crackpot fringe of “Commie-haunted apple editor, a philosopher and a presidential pickers and cactus drunks,” but also included Oaspirant huddled in a Florida hotel prominent Arizonians—some of whom had room. The topic of discussion was a deranged expressed sympathy for his candidacy. For candy manufacturer, Robert Welch. Welch, William F. Buckley and Russell Kirk, however, the a millionaire, was the head of the John Birch Birchers were a tumorous outgrowth of American Society, an extremist movement that trafficked in conservatism, and one that needed to be carefully anti-communist hysteria and absurd conspiracy excised. Buckley later recalled himself thinking, theories—most notably claiming that President “How can the John Birch Society be an effective Eisenhower had been a “conscious Communist political instrument while it is led by a man whose agent.”1 Troubled by the growing popularity of the views on current affairs are at so many critical movement, William F.
  • Murray N. Rothbard's Paleolibertarianism. in Search for A

    Murray N. Rothbard's Paleolibertarianism. in Search for A

    Murray N. Rothbard’s Paleolibertarianism. In Search for a Political Success during the Republican Party Presidential Primaries 1992 El paleolibertarismo de Murray N. Rothbard. En busca de un éxito político durante las primarias presidenciales del Partido Republicano de 1992 Marcin CHMIELOWSKI Freedom and Entrepreneurship Foundation, Poland [email protected] Recibido: 06/10/2015 Aceptado: 03/07/2016 Abstract Any evaluation of paleolibertarianism must be twofold. As it has been touched upon at the beginning of this article, it would be a good idea to view paleolibertar- ianism from two angles. As a political proposition, related to the “here and now” in which it came to be, as well as a theory of its own, the way it was expressed by Rothbard and Rockwell, it contributed something new to the already diverse tree of libertarianism. The first assessment must be mixed, partly negative. It is not so straightforward to assess paleolibertarianism as an idea. Its this poten- tial was never squandered, thanks to the continued activities of the Mises Institute in Auburn, Alabama. Rothbard’s work is being continued. And for the libertarian movement as a whole, it is advantageous that its individual parts clearly indicate the similarities and difference between them. Libertarianism is a young ideology, and an internal debate, and Rothbard’s legacy invites one, can only serve to further the cause of liberty. Keywords: Paleolibertarianism, Murray N. Rothbard, Rothbard-Rockewll Report. Resumen Toda evaluación del paleolibertarismo debe cubrir dos vertientes. Tal y como se menciona al inicio de este artículo, sería una buena idea contemplar el paleoliber- Res Publica.
  • The Right, Rights and the Culture Wars in the United States, 1981-1989

    The Right, Rights and the Culture Wars in the United States, 1981-1989

    The right, rights and the culture wars in the United States, 1981-1989 William Henry Riddington Hughes Hall University of Cambridge March 17 2017 This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Abstract The right, rights and the culture wars in the United States, 1981-1989 This thesis explores how the American right fought the culture wars of the 1980s in the context of the rights revolution and the regulatory state. It does so by examining divisions over anti-abortion measures in Congress, controversies surrounding allegations of discriminatory withholding of medical care from disabled newborns, debates over the extent to which Title IX and other federal anti-discrimination regulations bound Christian colleges that rejected direct federal funding, and the interplay between rights and education during the AIDS crisis. In doing so, it contributes to the still-growing historiography on both American conservatism and the culture wars. Firstly, it adds shades of nuance to the literature on the American right, which has, until recently, posited the election of Ronald Reagan as the beginning of an era of untrammelled conservative ascendancy. However, these case studies reveal that despite Reagan’s resounding electoral success and the refiguring of the Republican party along conservative lines, the 1980s right was forced to fight many of its battles on terrain that remained structured by the liberal legacy. This finding also contributes to recent trends in the historiography of the culture wars, which have added a great depth of historical understanding to America’s interminable conflicts over abortion, evolution, equal marriage and other social issues.
  • Making Economic Sense (1995) / Murray N. Rothbard

    Making Economic Sense (1995) / Murray N. Rothbard

    MAKING ECONOMIC SENSE Murray N. Rothbard Copyright © 1995 by the Ludwig von Mises Institute. Online publication prepared by William Harshbarger. Cover by Chad Parish. Table of Contents Preface Llewellyn H. Rockwell,Jr……………………………………….. 7 MAKING ECONOMIC SENSE Is It the “Economy, Stupid?…………………………………….. 9 Ten Great Economic Myths…………………………………….. 12 Discussing the “ Issues”………………………………………… 22 Creative Economic Semantics…………………………………... 26 Chaos Theory: Destroying Mathematical Economics From Within?………………………………………………………. 28 Statistics: Destroyed From Within?…………………………….. 30 The Consequences of Human Action: Intended or Unintended?……………………………………. 32 The Interest Rate Question……………………………………… 34 Are Savings Too Low?………………………………………….. 37 A Walk on the Supply Side……………………………………... 40 Keynesian Myths………………………………………………... 42 Keynesianism Redux……………………………………………. 45 THE SOCIALISM OF WELFARE Economic Incentives and Welfare………………………………. 50 Welfare as We Don’t Know It…………………………………... 52 The Infant Mortality “Crisis”…………………………………… 54 The Homeless and the Hungry………………………………….. 57 Rioting for Rage, Fun, and Profit……………………………….. 59 The Social Security Swindle……………………………………. 62 Roots of the Insurance Crisis……………………………………. 65 Government Medical “Insurance”………………………………. 67 The Neocon Welfare State……………………………………… 70 By Their Fruits………………………………………………….. 74 The Politics of Famine………………………………………….. 76 Government vs. Natural Resources……………………………... 78 Environmentalists Clobber Texas………………………………. 80 Government and Hurricane Hugo: A Deadly Combination………………………………………