Lafayette River Commitment to Participate in Projects That Promote the Health and Vitality of the Elizabeth River

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lafayette River Commitment to Participate in Projects That Promote the Health and Vitality of the Elizabeth River River Star Industries Over 80 area corporations who have made a Lafayette River commitment to participate in projects that promote the health and vitality of the Elizabeth River. These Little Creek Road Treasure Hunt are the ones located in The Lafayette watershed. Use this map as you explore the Lafayette River and see how many answers to this quiz you can ★1 Hermitage Lochhaven Wards Corner Museum & Gardens find along the way. (Corresponds to orange numbers on map) 8 ★2 Norfolk Yacht ★1 ▲▲▲ 64 1 | What unusual statue faces the river here? & Country Club Riverfront ★6 2 | What famous novelist once lived on this creek? ★3 Larchmont Library ★2 3 | Norfolk’s oldest park is here. When was it founded, Crab G Creek for what purpose? and Birdsong Wetland Algonguin4 r a n b 4 | What Virginia Governor lived in this neighborhood? 4 Old Dominion Park y ★ Talbot S t 5 | What unusual marine animal was spotted sunning Tanner’s fay r 5 University La e Park e e ★ t Suburban Acres Point e t t itself here one winter? 5 Norfolk Southern Th e Talbot ★ R Hall 4 6 | What pioneer role did this site play in the restoration Lambert’s Point iv ★ 5 er 9 of the Elizabeth River? ★6 HRSD VIP Plant Cromwell 7 | Why do boats congregate under this bridge at night? Larchmont 6 3 Farms 8 | What natural method of erosion control can you 7 Virginia Zoo ▲▲▲★ ★ learn at this site? Larchmont 1 8 ★ ★ Norfolk Environmental Commission The 9 | Why did Union soldiers not burn this Wayne Creek Elizageth Jam Roland estow 1803 mansion? ★9 Celebrate! Trees River n Park C re Riverpoint 10 | Stop at the picnic shelters here— or sc East e 10 Knitting Mill Creek Yacht Club Ti ★ n Belvedere study with what world-ranked coach? t d e Edgewater w 11 | Name this public restaurant on the 11 a Hampton Roads Rowing Club t ★ e G Lafayette where you can dock a small r r D a H C n Lakewood/ r i boat. a o v m b 11 l k e ▲▲▲ l e W Willowwood 9 River Star Schools y e e ★ p Cr il l What is atypical about the wetland y o ★ 12 | t 2 S o l w t ★ A W n Colley Bay Over 126 schools in Hampton Roads dedicated to ▲▲▲ 10 r o e ve v Mil Colonial o Dri 7 B d plants in this stretch of the Lafayette? e ★ e ★ o g n t 7 n teaching students to be stewards of the Elizabeth u i Place u t l 2 e it Highland e 12 Answers to Treasure Hunt 1) A nine-foot Lady Liberty rises from a n River. These River Star Schools are located in the v ▲▲▲ 8 K Haven Creek a ★ 11 house on Orleans Circle. 2) Leon Uris’s novel, QBII, mentions r Park 4 d Lafayette watershed. ★ crabbing in Knitting Mill Creek. 3) Lafayette Park dates to 1892 ▲▲▲ Lafayette Shores when it served as Norfolk’s first zoo. 4) Former Governor Colgate ★1 St Patrick’s Catholic School Darden Jr. lived in Algonquin Park. 5) Elaine Panneton of Lexan Riverview Crescent saw a grey seal on her dock, Feb. 7, 2010. 6) Birdsong 2 Larchmont Elementary Wetland became the first wetland restoration on the Elizabeth River ★ in 1997. 7) The Granby Street Bridge is a popular night-fishing spot 8 for striped bass. 8) Hermitage Museum and Gardens built a “living ★ 3 ★3 James Monroe Elementary shoreline” with education signage. 9) Talbot Hall was spared because of a United States seal over the fireplace. 10) Gloria Peek 4 Granby Elementary ▲▲▲ coaches at Barraud Park’s Boxing Center. 11) O’Sullivan’s Wharf is ★ ★7 worth the paddle for tasty oysters and brew. 12) Unlike in most of the Lafayette, freshwater plants like arrow arum thrive here. Lafayette/ 5 3 G ★9 Suburban Park Elementary r ★ ★ a Winona n b 1 y 6 Norfolk Collegiate Middle S t ★ r e & Upper School e yette Boule The Lafayette River Watershed t afa var L d e If you live anywhere in the green area, your land t Bridg 7 th Stree ★Norfolk Collegiate Lower School 26 drains to the Lafayette - and your help counts! ★ 6 8 Willard Elementary School ★ Lindenwood Legend ★9 Christ the King School ★5 ★10 LAFAYETTE RIVER Ghent Oyster Reefs 10 ★10 Lindenwood Elementary Barraud Park Rain Garden ★11 Jacox Elementary ★11 Lafayette River Star businesses & schools not shown on map Public Access for Norfolk Department of Utilities • Norfolk Stormwater Management Program Small Boats U.S. Maritime Administration, Division of Atlantic Operations • Virginia Port Authority Sherwood Forest Elementary • Rosemont Elementary • Tanner’s Creek Elementary 757/399-RIVR • www.ElizabethRiver.org ▲▲▲ Wetland Restoration Norview Elementary • Sherwood Forest Elementary • Crossroads Elementary A Cleaner River Starts With You 1 2 3 4 5 6 Top 2 things you can do to make a difference: 1) Reduce Fertilizer in Your MARSH LIFE of the Lafayette Ya r d . Save money and reduce 1 - Salt Marsh Snail, this cause of algae blooms that Melampus bidentatus can lead to fish kills. Only about a half-inch long, this snail lives in the "high marsh" or the salt marsh bushes along the highest areas of the wetland. Black ducks, among those in decline, love to eat these snails. Marsh and farmland until the first 2) Say “Boo” to Poo 2 - Periwinkle Snail, Littorina littorea street car crossed the 26th Street and Grease and This snail lives at lower elevations in the marsh. It can't live under water, so it moves up and down the grass stems with Feeding the Geese! the tides. Clapper rail birds prey on this snail. bridge in 1899, the Lafayette River respresents one of the last-developed Dog, human and goose poop 3 - Virginia Oyster, Crassostrea virginica wildernesses in urban Norfolk, Virginia. Today this tidal river promises make the river unsafe for Oysters in the Lafayette and the rest of the Elizabeth were once sold commercially as the famous "Norfolk oyster." Their to become the first branch of the Elizabeth River to return to health – with swimming. Everyone can help: Keep grease out of your kitchen harvest is now banned for health reasons, but multiple efforts are underway to bring back the native oyster. your help. The Elizabeth River Project, the Chesapeake Bay Foundation, 4 - Fiddler Crab, Uca pugnax drain (causes sewer overflows), Males of this species feature one large claw, displayed when they are ready to mate. They live in burrows along the river. the City of Norfolk and dozens more partners are working toward a goal scoop dog poop, encourage geese 5 - Square-backed Marsh Crab, Armases cinereum to make the Lafayette safe again for swimming and eating the once famous to migrate by not feeding them, and pump out your boat sewage. Note the rich purple color of this crab. It lives in the salt bushes in the highest elevations of the marsh. You see it climbing “Norfolk oyster” – by 2014. Our plan depends on you, for easy things around on bulkheads. you can do at home, school and work that make a big difference. A cleaner Find out how these 6 - Ghost Crab, Ocypode quadrata river starts with you. actions and more This crab burrows into beach sands. Beach habitat has mostly disappeared on the Lafayette, but this "ghost" is still to be can make you a star! found in patches of beach. To help make the Lafayette swimmable and fishable 7 - Atlantic Ribbed Mussel, Geukensia demissa RiverStarHomes.Org • 399-RIVR by 2014, visit ElizabethRiver.org and CBF.org This species is eaten in restaurants in other regions but joins banned shellfish here. The rib mussel secretes a thread to at- tach to other mussels, forming dense clumps that help stabilize the marsh. BIRDS of the Lafayette Population: 113,058 8 - Canvas-back Duck, Aythya valisineria Size: 21 square mile “watershed” or These striking ducks, with red heads and white backs, spend the winter in the Lafayette after migrating here from colder land draining into the Lafayette regions of Canada. Populations are declining. Named for: Marquis de Lafayette, “Boy General” 9 - Green Heron, Butorides virescens of the American Revolution One of the smaller herons that feeds in shallows along the Lafayette. Commercial harvest 10 - Yellow-crowned Night Heron, Nyctanassa violacea. of blue crabs in 2009: 54,588 pounds This distinctive bird is plentiful throughout the Lafayette River, nesting in tall pines. Fiddler crabs are a favorite diet. Number of commercial watermen: 3 Open harvest of oysters banned since: 11- Clapper rail, Rallus longirostris About 1925 Reason for ban: You don't see it a lot, but it's fairly common on the Lafayette. You know it's there more from its call, a harsh sound like Harmful bacteria clapping a stick along a rail. The clapper rail weaves wetland grasses together to nest in the marsh and feeds on snails Number of waterfront homes: 1,134 and fiddler crabs. Reason for state advisory against swimming: Harmful bacteria Special thanks to scientist Walter Priest, NOAA, for identifying the Suspected sources of bacteria: Pet and wild animal waste in stormwater runoff, wildlife of the Lafayette. aging sewer systems, boats pumping sewage directly in the river, and naturally occuring bacteria. A potential cause in your kitchen: Grease down the sink can clog sewer lines and cause an overflow No. 1 cause of low dissolved oxygen for fish: Harmful algal blooms (“red tide”) Sources of algal blooms: Excess nutrients from lawn fertilizing are a major source 7 8 9 10 11 Percent storm drains leading directly Name That Critter to the Lafayette with no filtering: 100 percent Fast Facts.
Recommended publications
  • Effects of Tidal Flooding on Estuarine Biogeochemistry: Quantifying Flood-Driven Nitrogen Inputs in an Urban, Lower Chesapeake Bay Sub-Tributary
    W&M ScholarWorks VIMS Articles Virginia Institute of Marine Science 8-2021 Effects of tidal flooding on estuarine biogeochemistry: Quantifying flood-driven nitrogen inputs in an urban, lower Chesapeake Bay sub-tributary Alfonso Macías-Tapia Margaret R. Mulholland Corday R. Selden Jon Derek Loftis Peter W. Bernhardt Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/vimsarticles Part of the Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment Commons Water Research 201 (2021) 117329 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Water Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/watres Effects of tidal flooding on estuarine biogeochemistry: Quantifying flood-driven nitrogen inputs in an urban, lower Chesapeake Bay sub-tributary Alfonso Macías-Tapia a,*, Margaret R. Mulholland a, Corday R. Selden a,1, J. Derek Loftis b, Peter W. Bernhardt a a Department of Ocean and Earth Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA b Center for Coastal Resources Management, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary, Gloucester Point, VA, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Sea level rise has increased the frequency of tidal flooding even without accompanying precipitation in many Sea level rise coastal areas worldwide. As the tide rises, inundates the landscape, and then recedes, it can transport organic and Tidal flooding inorganic matter between terrestrial systems and adjacent aquatic environments. However, the chemical and Nitrogen loading biological effects of tidal flooding on urban estuarine systems remain poorly constrained. Here, we provide the Water quality firstextensive quantificationof floodwaternutrient concentrations during a tidal floodingevent and estimate the Enterococcus King tide nitrogen (N) loading to the Lafayette River, an urban tidal sub-tributary of the lower Chesapeake Bay (USA).
    [Show full text]
  • A Clear Expression of Purpose
    The Park System of Norfolk, Virginia An Analysis of its Strengths and Weaknesses By The Trust for Public Land Center for City Park Excellence Washington, D.C. February 2005 Introduction and Executive Summary A venerable city with colonial-era roots, Norfolk, Virginia, has an increasingly bright future as the center of its large metropolitan area at the mouth of the Chesapeake Bay. In 2004, with their city in the midst of an impressive civic renaissance, a group of Norfolk citizen leaders became interested in knowing the state of Norfolk’s park and recreation system and how it compares with those of other similar cities. They turned to the Trust for Public Land’s Center for City Park Excellence, which is known for its studies of urban park systems, and contracted for an overview and analysis of Norfolk. With the assistance of the Bay Oaks Park Committee, and with cooperation from city officials, TPL undertook this study of Norfolk’s park system. Data on the system’s acreage, budget, manpower, and planning process was supplemented by interviews with city leaders, park and planning staff and Norfolk’s citizens. Utilizing an extensive database of city park information Norfolk was evaluated both on its own merits and against other American cities. By dint of time and budget, TPL’s analysis is not comprehensive; it only provides an initial set of snapshot views and comparisons. Nevertheless, the findings of this study are clear enough. By almost every measure, TPL finds that while the city of Norfolk has some wonderful parks, scenic riverfronts, tree-lined boulevards and sandy beaches, it simply doesn’t have enough of them.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamptonroads-Cp.Pdf
    Attachment I: HRSD Collection System Violations VADEQ IR Date of Incident Location Address Receiving Waters Number 2/14/2003 2003-T-1475 Newport News 949 Backspin Court Storm Drain 2/16/2003 2003-T-1470 Norfolk 5734 Chesapeake Blvd Tidal 2/17/2003 2003-T-1472 Norfolk 5734 Chesapeake Blvd Wayne Creek/ Lafayette River 2/18/2003 2003-T-1491 Norfolk Monterey & Bluestone Ave Elizabeth River 3/8/2003 2003-T-1661 Newport News Rt 60 Near Enterprise Dr. Lee Hall Reservoir 4/7/2003 2003-T-1943 Newport News Center Ave PS Hampton Roads Harbor 4/7/2003 2003-T-1944 Hampton N. King Street & MacAlva Drive S/W Branch Back River 4/9/2003 2003-T-1961 Newport News Rt 60, Enterprise Dr & Picketts Lee Hall Reservoir Lane 4/9/2003 2003-T-1963 Newport News 320 North Ave Hampton Roads Harbor 4/9/2003 2003-T-1964 Hampton N. King Street & MacAlva Drive S/W Branch Back River 4/9/2003 2003-T-1966 Suffolk 1136 Saunders Drive Shingle Creek 4/9/2003 2003-T-1989 Newport News 42 Franklin Street Hampton Roads Harbor 4/9/2003 2003-T-1990 Hampton E Gilbert & N. King Street S/W Branch Back River 4/9/2003 2003-T-1991 Hamptonp 3802 Chesapeakep Ave Hamptonp Roads Harbor 4/9/2003 2003-T-1992 Hampton 3847 Chesapeake Ave Hampton Roads Harbor 4/9/2003 2003-T-1993 Hampton Bridge Street PS Salters Creek 4/9/2003 2003-T-1994 Hampton Ivy Home Rd & Victoria Blvd Hampton Roads Harbor 4/10/2003 2003-T-2016 Newport News Center Ave PS Hampton Roads Harbor 4/10/2003 2003-T-2017 Newport News 320 North Ave Hampton Roads Harbor 4/10/2003 2003-T-2018 Newport News 321 North Ave Hampton Roads Harbor 4/10/2003 2003-T-2019 Newport News 42 Franklin Street Hampton Roads Harbor 4/10/2003 2003-T-2020 Hampton N.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial Commission Final Performance Report
    Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial Commission Final Performance Report Project Title: 1619: The Making of America” Project Directors - Cassandra Newby-Alexander and Eric Claville Grantee Institution - Norfolk State University and Hampton University Submission Date – December 9, 2014 1 Narrative Description The NEH-funded project, “Observing 1619,” provided the foundational support for us to host our second 1619: Making of America conference was held on September 18-19, 2014 at Norfolk State University and Hampton University. Planning this conference and accompanying programming targeting teachers has resulted in the creation of a broad-based partnership among various institutions, including the Hampton History Museum and the City of Hampton, our primary partners for 2013-2014. Moreover, our other partners included the College of Liberal Arts at Norfolk State University, Creative Services and Distance Learning at NSU, the NSU Foundation, Student Affairs at Norfolk State University, WHRO, the Fort Monroe National Monument (National Park Service), the Virginia Arts Festival Hampton University, Old Dominion University, Media Park at ODU, the Nottoway Indian Tribe of Virginia, Virginia Wesleyan College, the College of William and Mary’s Lemon Project, the Sankofa Project, the NSU Honors College, and the Intelligence Community Center for Academic Excellence at NSU. In addition, over the past two years, the project has received funding from the Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial Commission, Cox Communications, Dominion Resources, the Fort Norfolk Plaza, Bedford/ St. Martin’s Publishing, Pearson Publishing, the Fort Monroe National Monument (National Park Service), the NSU Foundation, Student Affairs at Norfolk State University, the College of Liberal Arts at Norfolk State University, and the Virginia Foundation for the Humanities.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Elizabeth River 2014
    State of the Elizabeth River Scorecard 2014 November 17, 2014 Scientific data compiled & analyzed by: Elizabeth River State of the River Steering Committee 2014, Convened by Virginia Department of Environmental Quality and The Elizabeth River Project Summarized and interpreted for the public by: Summary: From Almost Dead to an Average Score of C And Most Notorious Branch is Now the Most Improved Parents might not think a C is too hot, if your kid brings it home from school. But when one of the three most toxic rivers on the Chesapeake Bay brings home a C, that’s reason to celebrate. The Elizabeth River was commonly presumed dead when The Elizabeth River Project entered the picture in 1993. Fast forward to 2014. Area scientists have scored each of the branches of the Elizabeth for an average overall health of C for this urban river. Better news yet: The notoriously polluted Southern Branch of the Elizabeth River shows the most improving trends. This is the long stretch of the river that has been industrialized since before the Revolution; the branch too often in the past was described as devoid of life. For this report, area scientists found improving trends for bacteria, nitrogen, bottom health, and contaminants on the bottom of the Southern Branch. A committee of local, state and regional scientists prepared this State of the River report for The Elizabeth River Project and VA Department of Environmental Quality to determine changes since the last comprehensive scorecard for the Elizabeth River, issued by the same partners in 2008, and to identify trends over the last 10 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Elizabeth River Presentation
    Restoring One of America’s Greatest Rivers -Elizabeth River - Josef Rieger Deputy Director – Restoration Chesapeake Bay Program’s Toxic Contaminants Workgroup The Elizabeth River Project Mission: Restore the Elizabeth River to the highest practical level of environmental quality through government, business, & community partnerships. 2,000 citizen members 114 River Star facilities Government projects with US Navy, NOAA, US Army Corps of Engineers, US EPA, VA DEQ, VA DCR, Norfolk, Portsmouth, Virginia Beach, & Chesapeake. Elizabeth River Watershed • 200 sq. mile Lafayette River watershed Lafayette River • 4 Cities • Great Dismal Swamp Portsmouth freshwater Virginia Beach source Chesapeake • Trapped Estuary Action Plan for Restoring Elizabeth Action 1 – Goo Must Go! Cleanup contaminated sediments Action 2 – Greener shores Action 3 – Reduce bacteria Action 4 – Reduce nutrients Action 5 – Business ethic Action 6 – Protective policies Action 7 – Engage 25,000 citizen soldiers Elizabeth River Sediments Contamination from PAH - highest in the Chesapeake Bay (463 times average for bay) Cancer in the Mummichog Healthy Mummichog Liver Pre-Cancerous Mummichog Liver Cancerous Mummichog Liver Money Point – A Story of Environmental Restoration Money Point Money Point History & Legacy Impacts 12,126,000 12,127,000 Holland 3,454,000 Rotterdam 3,454,000 Ber Lem 3,453,000 3,453,000 Amerada Hess Navigation Channel Surface PAH (mg/Kg) < 45 3,452,000 45 - 100 3,452,000 100 - 500 500 - 1,000 Elizabeth River 1,000 - 2,000 2,000 - 3,000 Terminals > 3,000 Money Point, VA Alt 5A. Dredging in the north and NOTE: Coordinate System: VA State Plane Science Applications International Corporation a sand cap to the south Horizontal Datum: NAD83 A221 Third St.
    [Show full text]
  • A Water Quality Study of the Elizabeth River: the Effects
    A WATER QUALITY STUDY OF THE ELIZABETH RIVER: THE EFFECTS OF THE ARMY BASE AND LAMRERT POINT STP EFFLUENTS by Bruce J. Neilson Special Report No, 75 in Applied Marine Science and Ocean Engineering A Report to Hayes, Seay, Mattern and Yattern Virginia Institute of Marine Science Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062 William J. Hargis, Jr. Director May 1975 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Chapter 1. Conclusions and Recommendations ........... 1 Chapt Chapter 3 . The Fate of Materials Discharged into the Elizabeth River System ................ 12 Chapter 4 . Water Quality in the Elizabeth River System .................................... 44 Chapter 5 . Summary ................................... 52 Chapter 6 . Acknowledgements .......................... 54 Chapter 7 . References ................................... 55 Appendix A . Hydrologic and Climatological Data ........ 56 Appendix B . Data on Sewage Treatment Plants Discharging to the Elizabeth River System ................................... 66 Appendix C . Biological Surveys ........................ 71 Appendix D . Data from Water Quality Surveys and Dye Studies ............................... 83 Appendix E . Elizabeth River Model ..................... 103 CHAPTER 1. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1) An analysis of the slack water data from 1974 indicates that when strong stratidication exists in Hampton Roads, there will be strong vertical stratification in the Elizabeth River system as well. For these conditions, a non-tidal circulation will be set up which will enhance the exchange of water
    [Show full text]
  • Elizabeth River Watershed
    Community Based Restoration of the Elizabeth River – A Story of Success Josef Rieger Deputy Director – Restoration The Elizabeth River Project Mission: Restore the Elizabeth River to the highest practical level of environmental quality through government, business, & community partnerships. ➢ Working on restoring the river for 22 years ➢ 120 River Star facilities ➢ Over 4,000 River Star Homes ➢ Government projects with US Navy, NOAA, US EPA, VA DEQ, VA DCR, Norfolk, Portsmouth, Virginia Beach, & Chesapeake Elizabeth River Watershed • 200 sq. mile Lafayette River watershed Lafayette River • 4 Cities • Great Dismal Swamp Portsmouth freshwater Virginia Beach source Chesapeake • Trapped Estuary Best news: • Most improving 10-year trends in the once-notoriously polluted S. Branch • Delisting of the Lafayette River for bacteria • Dropping nitrogen concentrations in: • Southern Branch • Eastern Branch • Main Stem Watershed Action Plan Priorities: ❖ Action: Keep the goo going! ❖ Action: Achieve sustainable development and redevelopment ❖ Action: Restore resilient natural shores ❖ Action: Restore clean water ❖ Action: Create a river revolution Elizabeth River Sediments Contamination from PAH - highest in the Chesapeake Bay (463 times average for bay) Cancer in the Mummichog Healthy Mummichog Liver Pre-Cancerous Mummichog Liver Cancerous Mummichog Liver Money Point – A Story of Environmental Restoration Money Point Money Point History & Legacy Impacts 12,126,000 12,127,000 Phased ApproachHolland 3,454,000 3,454,000 Rotterdam Phase 3- Northern Ber Lem Dredging and Cap Phase 2- Northern Dredging and Sand Cap 3,453,000 3,453,000 Amerada Hess Phase 1- Living Cap Navigation Channel Surface PAH (mg/Kg) < 45 3,452,000 3,452,000 45 - 100 100 - 500 500 - 1,000 Elizabeth River 1,000 - 2,000 2,000 - 3,000 Terminals > 3,000 Money Point, VA Alt 5A.
    [Show full text]
  • Hampton Roads Planning District Commission Dwight L
    Reducing Nutrients on Private Property: Evaluation of Programs, Practices, and Incentives June 2012 HAMPTON ROADS PLPDCPDCANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION Virginia Coastal Zone M A N A G E M E N T P R O G R A M HAMPTON ROADS PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION DWIGHT L. FARMER EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/SECRETARY CHESAPEAKE POQUOSON AMAR DWARKANATH W. EUGENE HUNT, JR. ERIC J. MARTIN * J. RANDALL WHEELER CLIFTON E. HAYES, JR * ALAN P. KRASNOFF PORTSMOUTH ELLA P. WARD KENNETH L. CHANDLER * KENNETH I. WRIGHT FRANKLIN * R. RANDY MARTIN SOUTHAMPTON COUNTY BARRY CHEATHAM RONALD M. WEST * MICHAEL W. JOHNSON GLOUCESTER COUNTY * BRENDA G. GARTON SUFFOLK ASHLEY C. CHRISCOE * SELENA CUFFEE-GLENN LINDA T. JOHNSON HAMPTON MARY BUNTING SURRY COUNTY ROSS A. KEARNEY * TYRONE W. FRANKLIN * MOLLY JOSEPH WARD JOHN M. SEWARD ISLE OF WIGHT COUNTY VIRGINIA BEACH W. DOUGLAS CASKEY HARRY E. DIEZEL * DELORES DARDEN ROBERT M. DYER BARBARA M. HENLEY JAMES CITY COUNTY * LOUIS R. JONES * MARY K. JONES JOHN MOSS ROBERT C. MIDDAUGH JAMES K. SPORE JOHN E. UHRIN NEWPORT NEWS NEIL A. MORGAN WILLIAMSBURG * MCKINLEY L. PRICE * CLYDE A. HAULMAN SHARON P. SCOTT JACKSON C. TUTTLE NORFOLK YORK COUNTY ANTHONY L. BURFOOT * JAMES O. McREYNOLDS * PAUL D. FRAIM THOMAS G. SHEPPERD, JR. THOMAS R. SMIGIEL MARCUS JONES ANGELIA WILLIAMS *EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEMBER PROJECT STAFF JOHN M. CARLOCK, AICP HRPDC DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR WHITNEY S. KATCHMARK PRINCIPAL WATER RESOURCES PLANNER JENNIFER L. TRIBO SENIOR WATER RESOURCES PLANNER TIFFANY M. SMITH WTER RESOURCES PLANNER FRANCES HUGHEY ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT MICHAEL LONG GENERAL SERVICES MANAGER CHRISTOPHER W. VAIGNEUR REPROGRAPHIC COORDINATOR RICHARD CASE FACILITIES SUPERINTENDENT HAMPTON ROADS REGION REDUCING NUTRIENTS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY: EVALUATION OF PROGRAMS, PRACTICES, AND INCENTIVES Prepared for the HAMPTON ROADS PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • A Cleaner River Starts Here
    Lafayette River Steering Committee Convened by Elizabeth River Project and Chesapeake Bay Foundation Michael Barbachem, URS Corp. Robert Heide, Citizen/M.D. Libby Norris, Chesapeake Bay Foundation Danny Barker, HRSD Todd Herbert, VA Department of Mike O'Hearn, Lafayette Wetlands Partnership Doug Barnhart, DoodyCalls Conservation and Recreation Kevin Parker, HRSD Betty Baucom, Larchmont Elementary School Noah Hill, VA Department of Chad Peevy, Old Dominion University Ella Baxter, The Elizabeth River Project Conservation and Recreation James Pletl, HRSD Lawrence Bernert, Wilbanks, Julia Hillegass, Hampton Roads Josh Priest, The Elizabeth River Project Board Smith & Thomas Asset Planning District Commission Walter Priest, NOAA Pam Boatwright, The Elizabeth River Project Will Hunley, HRSD John Prince, Prince Landscapes Kristie Britt, VA Department Seshadri Iyer, URS Corp. Emma Ramsey, The Elizabeth River Project of Environmental Quality Fleta Jackson, City of Norfolk Joe Rieger, The Elizabeth River Project Jim Cahoon, Bay Environmental Marjorie Jackson, The Elizabeth River Project Joe Rule, The Elizabeth River Project Board Yolima Carr, Hermitage Museum & Gardens Dave Jasinski, Chesapeake Skip Scanlon, Virginia Beach Health Department Holly Christopher, Environmental Communications Mark Schneider, Virginia Zoo Norfolk Environmental Commission Rob Johnson, The Elizabeth River Project Juian Shen, Virginia Institute of Marine Science Tom Cinti, U.S. EPA Daniel Jones, City of Norfolk Amy Simons, City of Norfolk Amry Cox, Knitting Mill Creek Yacht Club John Keifer, City of Norfolk Mac Sisson, Virginia Institute of Marine Science Dan Dauer, Old Dominion University Judd Knecht, Citizen John Stewart, Lafayette Wetlands Partnership John Deuel, Norfolk Environmental Commission Andrew Larkin, NOAA Skip Stiles, Wetlands Watch Ken Dierks, Kimley Horn Tommy Leggett, Chesapeake Bay Foundation Randy Stokes, Living River Fred Dobbs, Old Dominion University Kristen Lentz, City of Norfolk Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Emergence of Algal Blooms: the Effects of Short-Term Variability in Water Quality on Phytoplankton Abundance, Diversity, and Community Composition in a Tidal Estuary
    Microorganisms 2014, 2, 33-57; doi:10.3390/microorganisms2010033 OPEN ACCESS microorganisms ISSN 2076-2607 www.mdpi.com/journal/microorganisms Article Emergence of Algal Blooms: The Effects of Short-Term Variability in Water Quality on Phytoplankton Abundance, Diversity, and Community Composition in a Tidal Estuary Todd A. Egerton 1,*, Ryan E. Morse 2,†, Harold G. Marshall 1 and Margaret R. Mulholland 3,† 1 Department of Biological Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Graduate School of Oceanography, The University of Rhode Island, Narragansett, RI 02882, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 3 Department of Ocean, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] † These authors contributed equally to this work. * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-757-683-3595; Fax: +1-757-683-5283. Received: 24 September 2013; in revised form: 28 October 2013 / Accepted: 28 November 2013 / Published: 8 January 2014 Abstract: Algal blooms are dynamic phenomena, often attributed to environmental parameters that vary on short timescales (e.g., hours to days). Phytoplankton monitoring programs are largely designed to examine long-term trends and interannual variability. In order to better understand and evaluate the relationships between water quality variables and the genesis of algal blooms, daily samples were collected over a 34 day period in the eutrophic Lafayette River, a tidal tributary within Chesapeake Bay’s estuarine complex, during spring 2006. During this period two distinct algal blooms occurred; the first was a cryptomonad bloom and this was followed by a bloom of the mixotrophic dinoflagellate, Gymnodinium instriatum.
    [Show full text]
  • Lafayette River Riverfest
    Challenges: Elevated nutrients, from sources such as excess lawn fertilizers The New Lafayetteand other nutrients in runoff, lead to harmful levels of algae. In recent years, a massive algal bloom has emerged each summer in the Lafayette, then spread into the larger Elizabeth River system, robbing the river of A Community Actionoxygen and resulting in fish kills. Plan to Meanwhile, harmful bacteria in the Lafayette contaminate shellfish, making them unsafe for Left: Harmful algae (Cochlodinium) begins to bloom (dark red), August 5, 2008 in the human consumption. Lafayette River. By August 11 (right), the bloom spreads into the rest of the Elizabeth River. Old Dominion University/HRSD data. Disappearance of native vegetation along the shore, Restore the Lafayetteincluding wetland grasses, contributes to high nutrientRiver levels by removing these natural filters. The native oyster, another important filter for the control of algae, has been decimated by disease, overharvesting and poor water quality. One top source of excess nutrients is often ignored - air pollution. As much as 34 percent of the nutrient problem in the Chesapeake Bay is attributed to air pollution. Pollutants in the air eventually fall either to the ground, where it can wash into the water, or falls directly in the water. Wetland grasses filter pollution and create a rich habitat for fish, shellfish and wading birds. While much restoration work remains, the Lafayette River still features about 375 acres of tidal wetlands, half of all wetlands in Norfolk. Photo courtesy of Kenn Jolemore. Lafayette River Restoration - A Watershed Action Plan - 9 Vision: To endow our children Proposed Activities: with safe swimming and fishing Kayak/Canoe Races and Rides in a bountiful Lafayette River.
    [Show full text]