NORTH ESSEX GARDEN COMMUNITIES West of Braintree

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NORTH ESSEX GARDEN COMMUNITIES West of Braintree NORTH ESSEX GARDEN COMMUNITIES West of Braintree CONCEPT FRAMEWORK MAY 2017 Project reference / Project number (optional) XX Month Year Document reference (optional) North Essex Garden Communities - West of Braintree Concept Framework NORTH ESSEX GARDEN COMMUNITIES West of Braintree CONCEPT FRAMEWORK FINAL REPORT 2 AECOM North Essex Garden Communities - West of Braintree Concept Framework Section 1.0 Section 2.0 Section 3.0 Section 4.0 Section 5.0 Appendix Introduction Approach and Concept Framework Delivery Stakeholder Concept Engagement 1.1 About this report 2.1 The ambition and vision 3.1 Framing principles leading 4.1 Infrastructure 5.1 Draft Policy SP10 - Options appraisal to a preferred option requirements Consultation responses evaluation criteria 1.2 Previous studies 2.2 Existing site context received 3.2 Preferred spatial structure 4.2 Implications for Policy 1.3 Key findings 2.3 Key design drivers SP10 5.2 Masterplanning ie 3.3 Land use, capacity and 2.4 Consideration of workshop placemaking alternatives 5.3 Stakeholder consultation 3.4 Access and movement 3.5 Infrastructure and sustainability 3.6 Green/ blue Infrastructure AECOM 3 North Essex Garden Communities - West of Braintree Concept Framework This chapter sets out the project objectives and the purpose of this report. 4 AECOM North Essex Garden Communities - West of Braintree Concept Framework 01 Introduction 1.1 About this report 1.2 Previous studies 1.3 Key findings AECOM 5 North Essex Garden Communities - West of Braintree Concept Framework 1.1 About this report AECOM has been commissioned by Braintree District, Colchester Borough, Tendring District, Uttlesford District and Essex County Councils to Report Structure produce a Concept Framework for the proposed The Concept Framework is set up across the following report structure: Garden Community for West of Braintree. 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Approach and Concept 3.0 Concept Framework 4.0 Delivery 5.0 Stakeholder Engagement Audience and baseline The North Essex Councils are assessing the potential for a Garden Community at West of Braintree and are the intended audience for this report. In that respect, it assumes The Concept Framework Provides a synthesis of existing A clear spatial illustration of Breakdown of proposed option A summary of initial engagement a high level of background knowledge and does not repeat the baseline analysis will support the Councils in contextual baseline analysis as the Framework, together with a phasing and associated impacts with the local communities, contained in previous reports, most notably the ‘Concept Feasibility Study’. This was the preparation of a sound well as key design drivers. suite of accompanying guiding on infrastructure and draft policy. community action groups and prepared by AECOM during the first half of 2016 to help inform the Councils’ selection evidence base and inform the framework plans and principles. key stakeholders on the nature, of Garden Communities to take forward through Preferred Options consultation. ongoing preparation of Local scale and key design parameters It drew together opportunities and constraints, capacity analysis, infrastructure Plans in respect of the Garden of the Garden Community. appraisal, deliverability and viability assessments. The study process also included the Communities and their defence preparation of a North Essex Garden Communities (NEGC) Charter, which sets out the at Examination in Public in 2017. level of ambition and key guiding principles that should underpin the further evolution of proposals. The evidence base documents that have led directly to this report are This chapter provides context to the A re-assertion of the North Essex Land use, capacity and placemaking Indicative infrastructure associated A review of consultation responses shown in Figure 1. commission with a demonstration of Garden Communities Charter and illustrating the proposed broad with the preferred option. received under the consultation the supporting evidence base. the vision / ambition of the North disposition of land uses including period of the draft Local Plan and Essex Councils. preferred locations for housing; A review of how current proposals specifically associated to Policy Spatial scope jobs and employment; new schools would impact on Policy SP10 of the SP10. A synthesis of existing context and and other community facilities; new draft Local Plan. The emerging policy for a Garden Community West of Braintree had assumed that, in baseline findings that influence the mixed use district/local centres; A synthesis of key findings at an addition to the homes planned for the area in Braintree District, a number may also be direction of the Concept Framework. formal/informal open space early workshop with Local Authority planned for in an adjacent area in Uttlesford District. However, work on the Uttlesford typologies and provision. representatives. Local Plan has been paused whilst the evidence base is reviewed and so this report A demonstration of the key design A summary of the two engagement only considers land in Braintree. This has a number of implications for the planning and drivers that combine to deliver Access and movement setting events held with Local Parish the framing principles and overall locations for proposed vehicular Councils and other stakeholders. concept design of a Garden Community West of Braintree. concept. access, routes and key footpaths, cycle tracks and/or bridleways as well as guidance on how these Status of findings and further work routes will align through and around the site connecting to surrounding The content of this report is high level and intended to offer an initial evidence base to settlements. determine the appropriateness of a Garden Community in this location. Infrastructure and sustainability Other studies have been commissioned alongside this work and must be read in proposals to demonstrate the new community would be appropriately conjunction with conclusions drawn. These include: serviced. − Transport: the findings will need to be tested and verified by Jacobs, the A green and blue infrastructure County Council’s retained transport consultants, including high level traffic network to demonstrate the incorporation of key landscape and modelling and an exploration of the potential for Bus Rapid Transit along the site features, proposed landscape A120 corridor that will influence options for sustainable travel. buffers, watercourses and an open space hierarchy are incorporated. − Economy: SQW and Cambridge Econometrics have been appointed to make recommendations to provide a basis for the employment land elements of the A consideration of phasing and Concept Framework. deliverability of site specific proposals consistent with Garden City Principles. 6 AECOM North Essex Garden Communities - West of Braintree Concept Framework 1.2 Previous studies Evidence Base Volume 1: Baseline, June Evidence Base Volume 2: Opportunities Evidence Base Volume 3: Options and North Essex Garden Communities Draft Interim Concept Framework, Final Concept Framework, April 2017 2016 and Constraints, June 2016 Evaluation, June 2016 Charter, June 2016 December 2016 This report provides a comprehensive synthesis A collation of existing data covering Providing a synthesis of the key Identifies two high level site options for The Charter sets out 10 placemaking This report set a draft interim framework of all work relating to the consideration of a a wide range of social, economic and opportunities and constraints arising the West of Braintree broad search areas. principles developed to articulate for comment by the Councils to inform Garden Community at West of Braintree. It environmental themes. The report from the analysis and understanding A high-level indicative development the Councils’ ambition for the Garden direction within which to finalise the provides sufficient technical detail to form part provides a contextual oversight for the of the evidence base presented in the capacity is provided based on a series of Communities, and help drive forward their Concept Framework for Testing. of the evidence base for plan making as well as common assumptions, with the options development. These are based on the highlighting areas that need to be supported West of Braintree broad search area. Baseline Compendium. subsequently evaluated using a Site Town and Country Planning Association’s by subsequent DPD policies in order to achieve Appraisal and the Garden Cities & Large (TCPA) Garden City Principles, but the quality of development envisaged against Sites Financial Model (originated by adapted for the specific North Essex Garden City Principles. ATLAS). The outcomes of each evaluation Context in the 21st Century. is presented but no conclusions drawn. Concept Feasibility Study Concept Framework Figure 1: North Essex Garden Communities- Previous Studies AECOM 7 North Essex Garden Communities - West of Braintree Concept Framework 1.3 Key findings Design drivers Consideration of alternatives Preferred Option framing principles There are a series of design drivers and framing principles that influence the proposed The Concept Framework has been formulated through an iterative process. Three The preferred option has been informed by a number of framing principles. These concept design approach, particularly in terms of extent and scale of development. options were prepared within the context of the integrated structure, with each option comprise an appreciation of: These are the outcome of a considered approach
Recommended publications
  • Terling & Fairstead Parish Council Parish Fairstead & Terling
    Village Design Statement Terling & Fairstead Parish Council Parish & Fairstead Terling September 2014 2 2 Contents Introduction Process Summary Your Planning Considerations Background Character Assessments Landscape Character Assessment Terling Village Centre Owls Hill New Road and Fairstead Road Hull Lane, Mill Lane and Norman Hill, Gambles Green & Flacks Green Waltham Road and Hare Green Fairstead Church End Fuller Street Ranks Green Parish-Wide Characteristics Conclusions Appendices not part of the approved document Appendix A Issues outside the scope of the VDS Appendix B Future Parish Consultation Appendix C The Natural History of Terling Appendix D Village Envelope Appendix E Listed Buildings Appendix F Results of Questionnaire Appendix G Diary of Events Acknowledgements Useful Contacts 3 3 Poster adverting the first public meeting on 7th February 2007 4 4 Introduction Rural communities are seen to be under threat from ill-conceived and badly designed planning and development. The purpose of a Village Design Statement (VDS) is to enable local people to have a say in how they wish their village to develop so that it does not lose its essential characteristics. The Terling and Fairstead Village Design Statement describes the particular character of our Parish and makes recommendations (guidelines) to influence future planning and development. It has been drawn up by representatives of the Parish in full consultation with the residents, businesses and the local planning authorities. The VDS is no paper exercise. Braintree District Council (BDC) formally approves the guidelines in a VDS and uses them in the determination of planning applications. This means that private and public planners and developers, builders, landowners, employers, architects and homeowners need to view it so that they can make informed decisions about how their plans affect the village character and environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Little Timbers Panfield, Braintree, Essex Little Timbers
    Little Timbers Panfield, Braintree, Essex Little Timbers Panfield, Braintree, Essex A charming Grade II listed period cottage in a delightful rural situation Sitting room � Bathroom Living room � Shower room Dining room � Utility room Study area � 3-bay cart lodge Kitchen/breakfast room � Parking for a number of cars Master bedroom suite � Pond 3 further bedrooms � Garden About 1.5 Acres Braintree 3.5 miles (Liverpool Street 61 minutes), Shalford 3 miles (access A120 6 miles), Witham 11 miles (Liverpool Street from 44 minutes), Felsted School 7.1 miles (15 minutes), Great Dunmow 14 miles, Chelmsford 16 miles, Stansted Airport 20 miles. Situation Little Timbers is located to the west of the village of Panfield in a quiet, rural situation. Braintree provides a good range of local facilities including schools and shops, with a wider range of recreational, educational and shopping facilities provided in the larger town of Colchester and the city of Chelmsford. For the commuter there is access onto the A120 linking with the M11 and Stansted Airport and there are train stations at Braintree and Witham to London Liverpool Street. Description Believed to be late medieval and extended in the 20th century, Little Timbers is Grade II listed, constructed of a timber frame with partly plastered, weather-boarded and shingled elevations. There are many period features including oak floors, period oak latch doors, leaded light windows and exposed beams. Accommodation The main entrance is via a large, attractive porch with a convenient bench and boot storage. The front door opens into a hallway with a galleried landing and second floor skylight.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Site Allocations & Development Management Plan
    Braintree District Council Draft Site Allocations and Development Management Policies Plan Sustainability Appraisal and Strategic Environmental Assessment Environmental Report – Non Technical Summary January 2013 Environmental Report Non-Technical Summary January 2013 Place Services at Essex County Council Environmental Report Non-Technical Summary January 2013 Contents 1 Introduction and Methodology ........................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 The Draft Site Allocations and Development Management Plan ........................................ 1 1.3 Sustainability Appraisal and Strategic Environmental Assessment .................................... 1 1.4 Progress to Date ................................................................................................................. 2 1.5 Methodology........................................................................................................................ 3 1.6 The Aim and Structure of this Report .................................................................................. 3 2 Sustainability Context, Baseline and Objectives.............................................................. 4 2.1 Introduction.......................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Plans & Programmes .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Essex Beekeeper
    THE ESSEX BEEKEEPER Bombus Lapidarius mating, 27 July 2008 Monthly Magazine of the E.B.K.A November No.527 EBKA website www.ebka.org 2008 Registered Charity number 1031419 1 Essex Beekeeper’s Association The Essex Beekeepers’ Association is a registered charity whose object is to further the craft of beekeeping in Essex. President Derek Webber Trustees Chairman : Ms Pat Allen, 8 Frank’s Cottages, St Mary’s Lane, Upminster, Essex RM14 3NU email [email protected] tel. 01708 220897 Secretary : Position vacant Treasurer : Richard Ridler, Rundle House, High St., Hatfield Broad Oaks, Bishops Stortford, CM22 7HE email [email protected] tel. 01279 718111 Divisional Trustees Richard Alabone, 11 St. James Park, Chelmsford CM1 2JG Geoff Pears, 82 Lexden Rd, Colchester CO3 3SR Jean Smye, 8 Gate Street Mews, Maldon CM9 7EF J Gracey, 3 Woodberry Down, Epping CM16 6RJ E Fenner, 36 Chequers Rd, Writtle CM1 3NQ J McNeill, 44 Ascension Rd, Collier Row RM5 3RT Penny Learmonth, The Watch House, Watch house Green, Felsted CM6 3EF Ann Tillbrook, Glen Tanar Lodge, 137 Blenheim Chase, Leigh-on-Sea SS9 3BX Divisional Contacts To contact a regional division: Braintree: Nobby Clark, 01277 220561 Chelmsford: Jean Smye, 01206 850605 Colchester: Lydia Geddes, 01206 392226 DH & Maldon: Nan Field, 01621 773297 Southend: David Blackwood, 01702 207078 Harlow: Paul Weeks, 01279 413326 Romford: Pat Allen, 01708 220897 Saffron Waldon: Jane Ridler, 01279 718111 Epping Forest: Ted Gradosielski 01992 890986 Essex Beekeeper’s Magazine Editor : Howard Gilbert, Glencairn, Eastside, Boxted, Colchester CO4 5QS email [email protected] Advertising , Distribution and Mailing Secretary: Mary Heyes, email [email protected] tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral Changes) Order 2004
    STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2004 No. 2813 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The County of Essex (Electoral Changes) Order 2004 Made - - - - 28th October 2004 Coming into force in accordance with article 1(2) Whereas the Boundary Committee for England(a), acting pursuant to section 15(4) of the Local Government Act 1992(b), has submitted to the Electoral Commission(c) recommendations dated April 2004 on its review of the county of Essex: And whereas the Electoral Commission have decided to give effect, with modifications, to those recommendations: And whereas a period of not less than six weeks has expired since the receipt of those recommendations: Now, therefore, the Electoral Commission, in exercise of the powers conferred on them by sections 17(d) and 26(e) of the Local Government Act 1992, and of all other powers enabling them in that behalf, hereby make the following Order: Citation and commencement 1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the County of Essex (Electoral Changes) Order 2004. (2) This Order shall come into force – (a) for the purpose of proceedings preliminary or relating to any election to be held on the ordinary day of election of councillors in 2005, on the day after that on which it is made; (b) for all other purposes, on the ordinary day of election of councillors in 2005. Interpretation 2. In this Order – (a) The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of the Electoral Commission, established by the Electoral Commission in accordance with section 14 of the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 (c.41). The Local Government Commission for England (Transfer of Functions) Order 2001 (S.I.
    [Show full text]
  • Newmarkb-Mp-Braintree-St1-2013-09
    WARD NAME NUMBER OF FORECAST FORECAST EVIDENCE AND RATIONALe THAT THE PROPOSALS COUNCILLORS ELECTORATE ELECTORAL MEET THE THREE STATUTORY CRITERIA IN 2019 VARIANCE IN 2019 1 Bocking North 2 4556 -3% The ward of Bocking North comprises the existing Bocking North ward (3795 electors) plus the unparished area of High Garrett (361 electors). The electors of High Garrett consider themselves more part of Bocking than the parish council area of Gosfield. The following roads – Kings Road, the remainder of Warne Avenue, part of Bailey Bridge Road and part of Boleyns Avenue (approximately 400 electors) which are currently part of Bocking South known as Bocking (College) polling district should now be included in this ward. 2 Bocking South 2 4587 -2% This ward consists of the existing Bocking South Ward less approximately 400 electors transferred to Bocking North (see above)(4079 electors). In addition 508 electors living on the north side of Rayne Road, Chadwick Drive, Malyon Close & Peel Crescent. This makes a logical boundary along the main thoroughfare of Rayne Road. 3 Braintree Blackwater 3 7561 +8% This ward consists of the communities (4843 electors) on the northern side of Coggeshall Road linking to Marlborough Road and Mountbatten Road. Within this area is the local primary school of Great Bradfords. The rest of the ward is made up of the two new developments clustered around the Marks Farm Tesco and bordered by the Braintree by Pass (A120/A131). These two communities are included in the catchment area for Lyons Hall Primary School. The Marks Farm Polling District (1409 electors) lies to the north of Coggeshall Road whilst the Twelve Acres Polling District (1309 electors) is on the south side.
    [Show full text]
  • ECC Bus Consultation
    Essex County Council ‘Getting Around in Essex’ Local Bus Service Network Review Consultation September 2015 Supporting Documentation 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Proposed broader changes to the way As set out in the accompanying questionnaire, Essex County Council (ECC) is undertaking ECC contracts for services that may also affect a major review of the local bus services in Essex that it pays for. These are the services that are not provided by commercial bus operators. It represents around 15% of the total customers bus network, principally in the evenings, on Sundays and in rural areas although some As well as specific service changes there are a number of other proposals which may do operate in or between towns during weekdays and as school day only services. This affect customers. These include: consultation does not cover services supported by Thurrock and Southend councils. • Service Support Prioritisation. The questionnaire sets out how the County Council will The questionnaire asks for your views about proposed changes to the supported bus in future prioritise its support for local bus services in Essex, given limited funding. network in your district. This booklet contains the information you need to understand This is based on public responses to two previous consultations and a long standing the changes and allow you to answer the questionnaire. Service entries are listed in assessment of value for money. This will be based on service category and within straight numerical order and cover the entire County of Essex (they are not divided by each category on the basis of cost per passenger journey.
    [Show full text]
  • Utt/0262/08/So - Stebbing
    UTT/0262/08/SO - STEBBING Scoping Opinion - for approximately 4500 homes Location: Land at Boxted Wood. GR/TL 694-232 Applicant: Scott Wilson Agent: Scott Wilson Case Officer: Ms K Hollitt 01799 510495 Expiry Date: 25/03/2008 Classification: OTHER NOTATION: Outside Development Limits/Ancient Woodland/County Wildlife Site/Adjacent to Listed Buildings. DESCRIPTION OF SITE: The application site is located on the border of Uttlesford and Braintree Districts. The site is 13km east of Stansted Airport, 10km from Great Dunmow and 7km to the west of Braintree. The hamlets of Stebbing Green and Blake End are sited to the south-west and south-east of the site respectively. The site measures a total of 135 hectares – 113ha in Uttlesford and 22ha in Braintree, of which 116ha is Grade 2 arable land and 19ha is Ancient Woodland, known as Boxted Wood. The site is generally flat, but slopes gently up towards Boxted Wood. There is a deep man made lake, created through gravel abstractions, located near the southern boundary of the site, adjacent to the B1256, and is used as a private recreational fishery. This southern boundary has a distinctive character of its own generated by the lake and adjacent wetland vegetation and the River Ter with its associated riverside vegetation. The site is bound by roads on three sides, the B1256 to the south, the road to Stebbing on the west, and Blakes Lane to the east. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: This application is for a "scoping opinion" is a preliminary stage of a proposed development that will come into the category that requires an Environmental Impact Assessment to be submitted with the planning application which will be in the form of an Environmental Statement.
    [Show full text]
  • Essex County Council (The Commons Registration Authority) Index of Register for Deposits Made Under S31(6) Highways Act 1980
    Essex County Council (The Commons Registration Authority) Index of Register for Deposits made under s31(6) Highways Act 1980 and s15A(1) Commons Act 2006 For all enquiries about the contents of the Register please contact the: Public Rights of Way and Highway Records Manager email address: [email protected] Telephone No. 0345 603 7631 Highway Highway Commons Declaration Link to Unique Ref OS GRID Statement Statement Deeds Reg No. DISTRICT PARISH LAND DESCRIPTION POST CODES DEPOSITOR/LANDOWNER DEPOSIT DATE Expiry Date SUBMITTED REMARKS No. REFERENCES Deposit Date Deposit Date DEPOSIT (PART B) (PART D) (PART C) >Land to the west side of Canfield Road, Takeley, Bishops Christopher James Harold Philpot of Stortford TL566209, C/PW To be CM22 6QA, CM22 Boyton Hall Farmhouse, Boyton CA16 Form & 1252 Uttlesford Takeley >Land on the west side of Canfield Road, Takeley, Bishops TL564205, 11/11/2020 11/11/2020 allocated. 6TG, CM22 6ST Cross, Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 4LN Plan Stortford TL567205 on behalf of Takeley Farming LLP >Land on east side of Station Road, Takeley, Bishops Stortford >Land at Newland Fann, Roxwell, Chelmsford >Boyton Hall Fa1m, Roxwell, CM1 4LN >Mashbury Church, Mashbury TL647127, >Part ofChignal Hall and Brittons Farm, Chignal St James, TL642122, Chelmsford TL640115, >Part of Boyton Hall Faim and Newland Hall Fann, Roxwell TL638110, >Leys House, Boyton Cross, Roxwell, Chelmsford, CM I 4LP TL633100, Christopher James Harold Philpot of >4 Hill Farm Cottages, Bishops Stortford Road, Roxwell, CMI 4LJ TL626098, Roxwell, Boyton Hall Farmhouse, Boyton C/PW To be >10 to 12 (inclusive) Boyton Hall Lane, Roxwell, CM1 4LW TL647107, CM1 4LN, CM1 4LP, CA16 Form & 1251 Chelmsford Mashbury, Cross, Chelmsford, Essex, CM14 11/11/2020 11/11/2020 allocated.
    [Show full text]
  • Braintree District Ward Profiles Great Notley & Black Notley Ward Revised May 2021
    Braintree District Ward Profiles Great Notley & Black Notley Ward Revised May 2021 1 2 Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................................... 4 About Great Notley & Black Notley Ward ........................................................................................................................ 5 Local Governance .............................................................................................................................................................. 5 Community Facilities ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 Major Businesses, Industrial Estates & Commercial Developments ................................................................................ 5 Development Sites ............................................................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. People ............................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Population ..................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Age ...............................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape-Assessment-Study-Final
    Salings Neighbourhood Plan LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT STUDY PART 1 August 2018 June 2018 Prepared by: Jacqueline Bakker Position: Landscape Architect Qualifications: MLA, Landscape Architecture Revision FINAL File Name: 2077 Salings Neighbourhood Plan Checked by: Mark Flatman Date Issued: 14/08/2018 Landscape Assessment Study: The Salings Neighbourhood Plan CONTENTS 0. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4. LANDSCAPE CONTEXT 4.1 General landscape character of The Salings 17 1. INTRODUCTION 4.2 Land-use classification and vegetation 17 1.1 Background to the study 3 4.3 Topography and hydrology 17 1.2 Objectives of the study 3 4.4 Landscape, cultural heritage and biodiversity designations 17 1.3 Approach and Methodology Overview 3 4.5 Time depth 25 1.4 Scope of the study 5 4.6 PRoWs and Access 27 1.5 Local Planning Context 5 4.7 Tranquility 27 4.8 Strength of landscape character 27 2. METHODOLOGY FOR THE STUDY 4.9 Existing landscape character assessments 27 2.1 Relevant advisory publications 9 2.2 Information sources 9 5. VISUAL CONTEXT 2.3 Identification of the study area 10 5.1 General visual amenity 33 2.4 Landscape context 10 5.2 Visual analysis 33 2.5 Visual context 10 5.3 Views in the south from Blake End Road 35 2.6 Identification of Local Parish Landscape Character Areas (LPLCAs) 10 5.4 Views in countryside to the east of Great Saling 37 2.7 Mitigation and recommendations 11 5.5 Views in countryside to the west of Great Saling 40 5.6 Views within and across the valley of Pods Brook 43 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Coggeshall Ward Revised May 2020
    Braintree District Ward Profiles Coggeshall Ward Revised May 2020 1 2 Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................................... 4 About Coggeshall Ward .................................................................................................................................................... 5 Local Governance .............................................................................................................................................................. 5 Community Facilities ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 Major Businesses, Industrial Estates & Commercial Developments ................................................................................ 5 Development Sites ............................................................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. People ............................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Population ..................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Age ...............................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]