Three Armored Vehicles May Form Family', Defense News, 8 March 1999

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Three Armored Vehicles May Form Family', Defense News, 8 March 1999 Notes Chapter 1 1 Keesing's Contemporary Archives, 16-23 October 1954, citing official US sources. 2 'Three Armored Vehicles May Form Family', Defense News, 8 March 1999. 3 'JSF Price Cap Concerns Experts' and 'F.22s Cost Worries Some in Con­ gress' ,Defense News, 5 April1999. 4 The current relevant document in Joint Interim Requirement Document 3. 'JSF programme office firms work plan', Flight International, 12-13 May 1999. 5 'DoD Pleads for Patience on Missile Defense', Defense News 7-13 De­ cember 1998. Interview with Jacques Gansler, US Undersecretary for Acquisition & Technology, Defense News, 15 March 1999. 'US seeks new MEADS Funding from partners', Jane's Defence Weekly, 24 March 99. 6 'Europeans Doubt US Plan for MEADS-Patriot Union', Defense News, 1 February 1999; 'Revisions Loom For Trinational MEADS Program', De­ fense News, 19 April1999. 7 E.B.Kapstein, 'Towards an American arms trade monopoly', Foreign Af­ fairs Vol. 73, No. 3, May/June 1994, pp. 13-19; Jens van Scherpenberg, 'Transatlantic competition and the European defence industries: a new look at the defence-trade linkages', International Affairs, Vol. 73, No. 1, January 1977, pp. 99-123. 8 ACDA, World Military Expenditures and Arms Transfers (Washington DC: USGPO, 1999). 9 'Alliance to make "Defence Capability Initiatives" a Reality', Jane's De­ fence Weekly, 5 May 1999. 10 France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom. 11 Letter of Intent on Measures to Facilitate the Restructuring of European Defence Industry signed by the Ministers of Defence of France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden and the UK, 6 July 1998. 375 376 Notes 12 'Europe Continues Slow March To Consolidation', Defense News, 7-13 December 1998. 13 'Pentagon Pares Cooperative Program Spending', Defense News, 15 Fe­ bruary 1999. 14 See speech by US Deputy Defense Secretary John Hamre of20 Novem­ ber 1998, reported in 'British Strive to Calm US Over Merger', Defense News, 1 March 1999 15 "US Seeks To Boost Defence Links to France" Defense News 26 April 1999. 16 See for instance 'Fuzzy Logic', Flight International, 24-30 March 1999. 17 'Raytheon Sets Sights on Euro Ties', Defence News, 29 March 1999. Chapter 2 1 On early NATO strength, see J. S. Duffield, Power Rules: The Evolution ofNATO's Conventional Force Posture (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1995), pp. 30-3 and H. Z. Lowenstein and V.V. Zuhlsdorff, NATO and the Defense of the West (Greenwood CT: Greenwood Press, 1960), pp. 71-72. 2 At first, Congress allocated the relatively minor amount of $1.314 billion for the MDAP in October 1949. After the start of the Korean War, MDAP and AMP assistance skyrocketed to $5.5 billion in September 1950. US Department of State, Foreign Aid by the United States Government, Basic Data through 31 Dec. 1952, i. Under the OSP, Western European nations received $14 billion in U.S. aid, largely for NATO production. US Depart­ ment of State, Report to Congress on the Mutual Security Program for the Fiscal Year 1960, State Department Publication, 7099, 1961, pp. 20, 75. 3 National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), Doc. No. 2202/1997, White House Office, Office of the Special Assistant for Natio­ nal Security Affairs, President's Committee to Study the Military Assistance Program, 16 Sept. 1957, Report on 'Mirror Imaging,' pp. 1-3. 4 T.R. Guay, At Arm's Length: The European Union and Europe's Defense Industry (London: Macmillan Press, 1998), p. 9. Notes 377 5 See H. Haftendom, NATO and the Nuclear Revolution: A Crisis of Credi­ bility, 1966-1967 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996); J. E. Dougherty and R. L. Pfaltzgraff, Jr. (eds.), Shattering Europe's Defense Consensus; The Anti­ nuclear Protest Movement and the Future of NATO (Washington, D.C.: Pergamon-Brassey, 1985); C. Bluth: 'Nuclear Weapons and British-German Relations', in B. Heuser and R. O'Neill (eds.): Securing Peace in Europe, 1945-62: Thoughts for the Post-Cold War Era (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1992). 6 S.G. Neuman and R.E. Harkavy (eds.), Arms Transfer in the Modem World (London: Praeger Publishers, 1979), pp. 23-24. 7 See S. McKee Rosen, The Combined Boards of the Second World War: An Experiment in International Administration (New York, Columbia Uni­ versity Press, 1951) and R. Cuff, The War Industries Board: Business-Go­ vernment Relations during World War I (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1973). 8 R. S. Jordan, The NATO International Staff/Secretariat, 1952-1957: A Study in International Administration (London: Oxford University Press, 1967). 9 C. S. Maier: 'The Making of "Pax Americana": Formative Moments of United States Ascendancy', in R. Ahmann, A.M. Birke and M. Howard (eds.): The Quest for Stability: Problems of West European Security, 1918- 1957 (London: Oxford University Press, 1993), pp. 420-2. See also M.P. Leffler, A Preponderance of Power: National Security, the Truman Admi­ nistration, and the Cold War (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1992.) 10 L. S. Kaplan, NATO and the United States: The Enduring Alliance (New York: Twayne Publishers, 1994), p. 37. 11 Wilfried Loth: 'The Korean War and the Reorganization of the European Security System 1948-1955', in Ahmann, Birke and Howard (eds.): The Quest for Stability, pp. 485-486. 12 NATO, Doc. PL/EW/243. 13 J. McGlade, 'The Illusion of Consensus: American Business, Cold War Aid and the Recovery of Western Europe, 1948-1958', Ph.D. dissertation (Ann Arbor, MI: University ofMichigan Microfilms, 1995). 14 A. Buchan and P. Windsor, Arms and Stability in Europe: A British­ French-German Inquiry (London: Chatto & Windus, 1963), p. 33. 378 Notes 15 George C. Marshall Library, William C. Foster Collection, Box 27, Folders 1-18, MSA Program Proposal- FY 1959, 'Chart of Aid Appropriations, 1948-1959'. 16 NARA, RG 449, ECA, OD, SF, Box 2, File: 'ECA Third Year Report', 1951, pp. 2-4. 17 J. McGlade: 'From Business Reform to Production Drive: The Transfor­ mation of US Technical Assistance to Western Europe', in M. Kipping and 0. Bjamar (eds.): The Americanization of European Business: The Mar­ shall Plan and the Transfer of US Management Models (London: Rout­ ledge, 1998), p. 26. 18 The Mutual Security Agency (MSA) acted as the successor agency to the Economic Cooperation Administration (ECA) which directed the dispersal of Marshall Aid from 1948-1952. 19 J. McGlade, The Illusion of Consensus. 20 NARA, RG 469, ECA, SRIE, PTAD, ITEB, SF, Box 2, File: OEEC­ EPA, 27-30 Aug. 1953, 'Direct Investment by U.S. Producers in European Defense Production: Paris Mission Chiefs Meeting,' pp. 1-2. 21 NARA, RG 469, MSA, SRIE, PTAD, SF, Box 34, File: Defense General 614, 'Mobilization Readiness Program', 1953, pp. 1-2. 22 NARA, RG 469, MSA, OD, GFD, Box 18, File: U.K. 1954, 3 Sept. 1954, 'FOA Mission Report: U.S. Aid to British Aircraft Program', p. 33. 23 NARA, RG 469, MSA, SRIE, PTAD, SF, Box 34, File: Defense- U.K. 614, 30 Mar. 1953, Cablegram on U.K. 1954 OSP Program, p. 4. 24 J. Zeitlin, 'Between Flexibility and Mass Production: Debate and Industrial Reorganization in British Engineering, 1830-1980,' (forthcoming Oxford University Press), Ch. 9, pp. 3-4. 25 D. Edgerton, England and the Aeroplane: An Essay on a Militant and Technological Nation (London: Macmillan Publishers 1991), pp. 88-89. 26 NARA, RG 469, MSA, SRIE, PTAD, SF, Box 34, File: Defense- U.K. 614,30 Mar. 1953, Cablegram on U.K. 1954 OSP Program, pp. 4-5. 27 NARA, RG 469, MSA, OD, GFD, Box 18, File: U.K. 1954 U.K. OSP Aircraft Report, p. 18. 28 J. McGlade: From Business Reform to Production Drive, p. 28-29. Notes 379 29 NARA, RG 469, MSA, PTAD, OD, SF, Box 1, File: 1953 Congressional Presentation, pp. 3-4. 30 Public Records Office (PRO), A VIA 53/6/1549/, Folder #457, 17 Apr. 1953, P.H. Goffrey, Minister of Supply to Rolls Royce Ltd. 31 PRO, AVIA 53, 611549/412, 16 Apr. 1953, Gregory Committee Report, pp. 1-4. 32 PRO, A VIA 53/6/18336, Folder #465, 11 Sept. 1953, MSA Contract to Whitworth Amstrong Aviation Company. 33 NARA, RG 469, MSA, OD, GFD, Box 18, File: U.K. Commodities­ Airplanes, 'UK OSP Aircraft Report 1954', p. 17. 34 PRO, A VIA 53, 6/6315/465, 11 Sept. 1953, MSA Contract with Whitworth Armstrong Aviation Company. 35 PRO, A VIA 53, 6/8435/479, Report on 'Supply of Hunter F1 Aircraft for OSP by Hawker Aviation Company, Blackpool, England, 1954-1957'. 36 Ibid., p. 2. 37 NARA, RG 469, MSA, OD, GFD, Box 18, File: U.K. Commodities - Airplanes, 9 Dec. 1953, H. Stassen to J. Ohly. 38 NARA, RG 469, AID, ODD, MDAC, Box 3, MSA Summaries and Related Documents, 1953-1959. Also see Ine Megens: 'Problems of Military Production Co-ordination'. in Heuser and O'Neill (eds.): Securing Peace in Europe, pp. 285-86. 39 NARA, RG 469, MSA, OD, GFD, Box 18, File: U.K. Commodities­ Airplanes, 9 Dec. 1953, H. Stassen to J. Ohly. 40 NARA, RG 4691, MSA, AA, PTAD, PDS, SF, Box 1, File: Projects­ Industrial, 'Industry Division Projects Report, Italy- 1953,' p. 1. 41 Ibid., pp. 2-3. 42 For a survey of post-war Italian defense manufacturing, see V. S. Pisano: 'The Italian Armed Forces', in L.H. Gann (ed.): The Defense of Western Europe (London: Croom Helm, 1987); F. Andreatta and C. Hill: 'Italy', in J. Howorth and A. Menon (eds.): The European Union and National Defense Policy (London: Routledge, 1997); and G. Perani and M. Pianta: 'The Slow Restructuring of the Italian Arms Industry', in M. Brzoska and P.
Recommended publications
  • Theatre Reviews
    REVIEWERS Imke Lichterfeld, Erica Sheen INITIATING EDITOR Mateusz Grabowski TECHNICAL EDITOR Zdzisław Gralka PROOF-READER Nicole Fayard COVER Alicja Habisiak Task: Increasing the participation of foreign reviewers in assessing articles approved for publication in the semi-annual journal Multicultural Shakespeare: Translation, Appropriation and Performance financed through contract no. 605/P-DUN/2019 from the funds of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education devoted to the promotion of scholarship Printed directly from camera-ready materials provided to the Łódź University Press © Copyright by Authors, Łódź 2019 © Copyright for this edition by University of Łódź, Łódź 2019 Published by Łódź University Press First Edition W.09355.19.0.C Printing sheets 12.0 ISSN 2083-8530 Łódź University Press 90-131 Łódź, Lindleya 8 www.wydawnictwo.uni.lodz.pl e-mail: [email protected] phone (42) 665 58 63 Contents Contributors ................................................................................................... 5 Nicole Fayard, Introduction: Shakespeare and/in Europe: Connecting Voices ................................................................................................ 9 Articles Nicole Fayard, Je suis Shakespeare: The Making of Shared Identities in France and Europe in Crisis .......................................................... 31 Jami Rogers, Cross-Cultural Casting in Britain: The Path to Inclusion, 1972-2012 .......................................................................................... 55 Robert
    [Show full text]
  • Jolyon Howorth & Vivien Schmidt
    EU GLOBAL STRATEGY 50 ExperT Opinion Jolyon Howorth & Vivien Schmidt Visiting Professor of Political Science, Yale University Professor of International Relations, Boston University There is a danger in making the strategic review hope to achieve in the neighbourhood – including too complex. There is merit in recalling the par- the neighbours of the neighbours. The geograph- simonious interpretation of the world that has ic focus is important. The EU is a global trading inspired realists: system anarchy; the fundamen- actor and a key partner of the UN; but in terms tal role of states; the centrality of the distribution of the deployment of crisis management power, of power; balance of power. Indeed, power itself. it should not for the foreseeable future aspire to be anything other than a regional power. These basics remain the© crucialEU Institute forelements Security Studies, of 2015. inter | QN-AL-15-00X-2A-N- | ISBN 978-92-9198-258-5 | ISSN 2315-1129 | DOI 10.2815/77528 national relations. The currencies the EU prefers What might the EU hope to achieve in the neigh- – multilateralism, international law, international bourhood? Lucidity about the EU’s real leverage institutions, diplomacy, soft and smart power – is essential. If EU accession is not on the cards, have all come into their own since 1945 and they leverage is massively reduced. The most the EU have a vital role to play. But there should be no can hope to do in the southern neighbourhood is illusions: positive sum aspirations have not re- to assist local and regional political initiatives aimed placed zero-sum realities.
    [Show full text]
  • Stanton Nuclear Security Fellows Seminar
    Stanton Nuclear Security Fellows Seminar PANEL 2: The Uses of History 1. Jonathan Hunt, RAND The Bargain: The United States, Global Nuclear Order, and the Last War, 1956-1975 Objectives: The global nuclear regime is the culmination of efforts to manage nuclear technology internationally. The original meanings of the treaties that inaugurated the regime, which for interpretive purposes have been identified as the 1963 Limited Test Ban Treaty (LTBT), the 1967 Treaty of Tlatelolco, which denuclearized Latin America and the 1968 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), are rooted in how and why they were first brokered. This book situates these international agreements in their original contexts, most notably the Cold War, decolonization, development and the United Nations. It also advances a historical theory of states’ attitudes toward nuclear weapons and correspondingly proliferation, which holds that a society’s memory of what Philip Bobbitt calls epochal wars and which I style “last wars,” frames how it views the relationship between sovereignty, national security and international order.1 Overview: The world’s states built a global regime to manage the development and dissemination of nuclear weapons from 1956 to 1975, when climbing sales of nuclear reactors and a drumbeat of nuclear crises at hotspots around the world convinced many that multilateral and international measures were needed to manage the atom. Three nuclear powers—the United States, the Soviet Union and the United Kingdom—worked together and within an international community then emerging from decolonization to devise common rules and collective arrangements for nuclear security. Three solutions were identified: a nuclear-test ban, regional pacts to keep nuclear weapons out of certain neighborhoods and a global agreement to forbid new states from acquiring them.
    [Show full text]
  • Honours Thesis Game Theory and the Metaphor of Chess in the Late Cold
    Honours Thesis Game Theory and the Metaphor of Chess in the late Cold War Period o Student number: 6206468 o Home address: Valeriaan 8 3417 RR Montfoort o Email address: [email protected] o Type of thesis/paper: Honours Thesis o Submission date: March 29, 2020 o Thesis supervisor: Irina Marin ([email protected]) o Number of words: 18.291 o Page numbers: 55 Abstract This thesis discusses how the game of chess has been used as a metaphor for the power politics between the United States of America and the Soviet Union during the Cold War, particularly the period of the Reagan Doctrine (1985-1989). By looking at chess in relation to its visual, symbolic and political meanings, as well in relation to game theory and the key concepts of polarity and power politics, it argues that, although the ‘chess game metaphor’ has been used during the Cold War as a presentation for the international relations between the two superpowers in both cultural and political endeavors, the allegory obscures many nuances of the Cold War. Acknowledgment This thesis has been written roughly from November 2019 to March 2020. It was a long journey, and in the end my own ambition and enthusiasm got the better of me. The fact that I did three other courses at the same time can partly be attributed to this, but in many ways, I should have kept my time-management and planning more in check. Despite this, I enjoyed every moment of writing this thesis, and the subject is still captivating to me.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fallacy of Nuclear Deterrence
    THE FALLACY OF NUCLEAR DETERRENCE LCol J.P.P. Ouellet JCSP 41 PCEMI 41 Exercise Solo Flight Exercice Solo Flight Disclaimer Avertissement Opinions expressed remain those of the author and Les opinons exprimées n’engagent que leurs auteurs do not represent Department of National Defence or et ne reflètent aucunement des politiques du Canadian Forces policy. This paper may not be used Ministère de la Défense nationale ou des Forces without written permission. canadiennes. Ce papier ne peut être reproduit sans autorisation écrite. © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as © Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, représentée par represented by the Minister of National Defence, 2015. le ministre de la Défense nationale, 2015. CANADIAN FORCES COLLEGE – COLLÈGE DES FORCES CANADIENNES JCSP 41 – PCEMI 41 2014 – 2015 EXERCISE SOLO FLIGHT – EXERCICE SOLO FLIGHT THE FALLACY OF NUCLEAR DETERRENCE LCol J.P.P. Ouellet “This paper was written by a student “La présente étude a été rédigée par un attending the Canadian Forces College stagiaire du Collège des Forces in fulfilment of one of the requirements canadiennes pour satisfaire à l'une des of the Course of Studies. The paper is a exigences du cours. L'étude est un scholastic document, and thus contains document qui se rapporte au cours et facts and opinions, which the author contient donc des faits et des opinions alone considered appropriate and que seul l'auteur considère appropriés et correct for the subject. It does not convenables au sujet. Elle ne reflète pas necessarily reflect the policy or the nécessairement la politique ou l'opinion opinion of any agency, including the d'un organisme quelconque, y compris le Government of Canada and the gouvernement du Canada et le ministère Canadian Department of National de la Défense nationale du Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Institutional Architecture for the Transatlantic Relationship?
    EuropeEurope VVisionsisions 55 A New Institutional Architecture for the Transatlantic Relationship? Jolyon Howorth June 2009 Ifri-Bruxelles The Institut français des relations internationales (Ifri) is a research center and a forum for debate on major international political and economic issues. Headed by Thierry de Montbrial since its founding in 1979, Ifri is a non governmental and a non-profit organization. As an independent think tank, Ifri sets its own research agenda, publishing its findings regularly for a global audience. Using an interdisciplinary approach, Ifri brings together political and economic decision-makers, researchers and internationally renowned experts to animate its debate and research activities. With offices in Paris and Brussels, Ifri stands out as one of the rare French think tanks to have positioned itself at the very heart of European debate. The opinions expressed in this text are the responsibility of the authors alone. ISBN : 978-2-86592-558-2 © All rights reserved, Ifri, 2009 IFRI IFRI-BRUXELLES 27 RUE DE LA PROCESSION RUE MARIE-THÉRÈSE, 21 75740 PARIS CEDEX 15, FRANCE 1000 - BRUXELLES, BELGIQUE PH. : +33 (0)1 40 61 60 00 PH. : + 32 (0)2 238 51 10 Email : [email protected] Email: [email protected] WEBSITE : Ifri.org Contents THE CRISIS OF TRANSATLANTIC RELATIONS ........................................ 2 NATO: P ART OF THE SOLUTION OR PART OF THE PROBLEM ?.............. 4 HISTORY IN FAST -FORWARD MODE ..................................................... 7 REVISED INSTITUTIONAL ARCHITECTURE & R ECOMMENDATIONS
    [Show full text]
  • Ivv), 1913 – 1945
    De Internationale van Amsterdam De Wereld van het Internationaal Vakverbond (IVV), 1913 – 1945. 1 Korte Inhoud Inleiding 1 De Wereld van het Internationaal Vakverbond 13 (Amsterdam, Berlijn, Parijs) De Verscheurende roep naar Internationale Eenheid 67 (De Rode Verleiding van het Internationaal Vakverbond) Ondergeschikte of Partner 96 (De moeilijke relatie tussen het IVV als koepel van nationale centrales en de beroepsinternationalen) Genève 114 (De IAO en het sociale hervormingsprogramma van het IVV) Seeking for Problems 135 (De vrouwenwerking van het IVV) Isolationisme of leiderschap 145 (De American Federation of Labor en het Internationaal Vakverbond) Een vrije vakbeweging in een wereld zonder vrijheid 165 (Het IVV tegen fascisme en nazisme) Voorbij het Internationaal vakverbond 196 (De weg naar het Wereldvakverbond) Under Cover 222 (De geheime diensten van de internationale vakbeweging) Conclusies 243 Acroniemen 252 Bijlagen 255 Bibliografie 257 2 Inleiding “The history of labor internationalism is a history of failure, of dreams disappointed, ideals compromised, and institutions corrupted” (Victor Silverman)1. Edo Fimmen had het al voorspeld in 1933 : “the judgement of history upon the labour movement in the years immediatly following the war, and especially upon the leaders of that movement, is not likely to be a merciful one.”2 In juli 1919 werd in Amsterdam het Internationaal Vakverbond (IVV) opgericht. Deze ‘Internationale van Amsterdam’3 verklaarde de oorlog aan de oorlog en wou de arbeiders bevrijden van het kapitalisme. Voor Edo Fimmen, een van de vaders van het IVV, was het al sinds 1923 duidelijk dat het anders zou lopen en hij drong lang maar tevergeefs aan op een meer daadkrachtige internationale vakbeweging.
    [Show full text]
  • France, NATO and ESDP: the Impossible Balancing
    France, NATO and European Security: Status Quo Unsustainable; New Balance Unattainable? Jolyon HOWORTH∗ In January 1947, British and French officials met to discuss draft versions of the Treaty of Dunkirk. A sticking point emerged over the precise conditions under which the proposed mutual defence clause could be invoked. For the French, the simple threat of territorial invasion should trigger British support. For the British, however, only an actual invasion could warrant the implementation of alliance solidarity. This seemingly arcane distinction already presaged the fundamental difference of strategic approach between Paris and London which was to result in fifty years of stalemate in European defence Cupertino. For the United Kingdom (U.K.), too strong a statement of European resolve risked demotivating the United States (U.S.) and encouraging U.S. isolationism. For France, a strong Europe was the logical prerequisite for a strong Alliance. Europe needed to balance U.S. power—in the interests of both parties. Thus, from the outset of the post-war period, France expressed confidence in Europe's ability to safeguard her own future, whereas Britain worried that the old continent could never be secure without the permanent entanglement of the new1. Contrary to a great deal of mythology, France was never opposed to the “involvement of the new”—indeed the mainstream of the political class, including Charles de Gaulle himself, actively pressed for the creation of NATO and for the construction of an Atlantic partnership. What France in general (and the General in particular) could not accept was an imbalanced alliance in which one of the ∗ Jolyon Howorth is Jean Monnet Professor of European Politics at Bath University and Associate Research Fellow at the French Institute of International Relations (Ifri).
    [Show full text]
  • Download the List of Participants
    46 LIST OF PARTICIPANTS Socialfst International BULGARIA CZECH AND SLOVAK FED. FRANCE Pierre Maurey Bulgarian Social Democratic REPUBLIC Socialist Party, PS Luis Ayala Party, BSDP Social Democratic Party of Laurent Fabius Petar Dertliev Slovakia Gerard Fuchs Office of Willy Brandt Petar Kornaiev Jan Sekaj Jean-Marc Ayrault Klaus Lindenberg Dimit rin Vic ev Pavol Dubcek Gerard Collomb Dian Dimitrov Pierre Joxe Valkana Todorova DENMARK Yvette Roudy Georgi Kabov Social Democratic Party Pervenche Beres Tchavdar Nikolov Poul Nyrup Rasmussen Bertrand Druon FULL MEMBER PARTIES Stefan Radoslavov Lasse Budtz Renee Fregosi Ralf Pittelkow Brigitte Bloch ARUBA BURKINA FASO Henrik Larsen Alain Chenal People's Electoral Progressive Front of Upper Bj0rn Westh Movement, MEP Volta, FPV Mogens Lykketoft GERMANY Hyacinthe Rudolfo Croes Joseph Ki-Zerbo Social Democratic Party of DOMINICAN REPUBLIC Germany, SPD ARGENTINA CANADA Dominican Revolutionary Bjorn Entolm Popular Socialist Party, PSP New Democratic Party, Party, PRD Hans-Joe en Vogel Guillermo Estevez Boero NDP/NPD Jose Francisco Pena Hans-Ulrich Klose Ernesto Jaimovich Audrey McLaughlin Gomez Rosemarie Bechthum Eduardo Garcia Tessa Hebb Hatuey de Camps Karlheinz Blessing Maria del Carmen Vinas Steve Lee Milagros Ortiz Bosch Hans-Eberhard Dingels Julie Davis Leonor Sanchez Baret Freimut Duve AUSTRIA Lynn Jones Tirso Mejia Ricart Norbert Gansel Social Democratic Party of Rejean Bercier Peg%:'. Cabral Peter Glotz Austria, SPOe Diane O'Reggio Luz el Alba Thevenin Ingamar Hauchler Franz Vranitzky Keith
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction the Period from the Spring of 1890 Into the Summer Of
    Introduction The period from the spring of 1890 into the summer of 1892 was a time of emotional turmoil for Peirce, a time of rash ventures and dashed hopes that would culminate in a transforming experience and a new sense of purpose.1 In the decade following the death of his father in 1880, Peirce suffered a number of life-changing defeats, including the loss of his teaching appointment at Johns Hopkins University and the stripping away of his leadership in gravity determinations for the U.S. Coast & Geodetic Survey. Peirce’s marriage in 1883 to his reputed mistress, the mysterious Juliette Froissy Pourtalais, and his ill- considered attempt to introduce her openly into his social circles, brought a rude end to his way of life up to that time. In April 1887, Charles and Juliette left New York for Milford, Pennsylvania, where they hoped to find acceptance in Milford’s small but thriving French community. In the spring of 1890, as the period of the present volume was about to begin, Peirce helped organize a debate in the pages of The New York Times on the soundness of Herbert Spencer’s evolutionary philosophy and he signed his contributions with the pseudonym “Outsider,” reflecting his increasing estrangement from mainstream society. At the age of fifty, Peirce had been pushed from center stage and his native sense of entitlement had been crushed. Peirce’s feeling of exclusion and disadvantage intensified during these years so that by May 1892, writing again as the Outsider, he would rail against the “politico-economical deification of selfishness” and its anti-Christian corrupting influence on society (see sel.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring Commencement
    S PRING 2018 C THE BELLs OF IOWA STATE OMMEN c EMENT THE HIsTORY OF “THE BELLs OF IOWA STATE” James C. Wilson (1900-1995) was a member of Iowa State’s English faculty from 1928 to 1931. He had to resign due to his lack of a Ph.D., and prior to his departure, he submitted a college song candidate for a song contest sponsored by the Iowa State Club of Chicago. Jim and his wife, Alice, moved to Chicago where as he notes, “We (in addition to their two SPRING COMMENcEMENT babies) had $212 in cash from my last paycheck, our five-year-old Chevrolet, and the tent.” He won first place with “The Bells of Iowa State,” and the family was able to purchase a Iowa State University Library THURsDAY, MAY 3, 2018 Special Collections Department small cottage on Lake Michigan. SATURDAY, MAY 5, 2018 “When I wrote ‘The Bells of Iowa State,’ I thought then that it had much more depth and emotion than your basic football fight song,” Wilson said. “Its continuing popularity leaves me very pleased, not so much because it’s my own song, but because it has had such a good effect on those who have been touched by it.” (The Iowa Stater, June 1983) Dear Iowa State University Graduates and Guests: Congratulations to all of the Spring 2018 graduates of Iowa State University! Welcome to Iowa State University’s Spring 2018 Commencement. Congratulations to all of the graduates, and thank you to everyone who played a role in their successful journey through Iowa State.
    [Show full text]
  • 4133 POSITION NAME TERM DOB AFFIL AFGHANISTAN President (2Nd) Karzai, Hamid 19-06-02 07-12-04 24-12-57 Indep. Chairman, Authorit
    4133 POSITION NAME TERM DOB AFFIL AFGHANISTAN President (2nd) Karzai, Hamid 19-06-02 07-12-04 24-12-57 Indep. Chairman, Authority Interim Karzai, Hamid 22-12-01/19-06-02 24-12-57 Indep. President (1st) Rabbani, Burhanuddin 13-11-01/22-12-01 1940 Jamiat First Vice President Masood, Ahmad Zia 07-12-04 01-05-56 Second Vice President Khalili, Abdul Karim 07-12-04 1946 HW ALBANIA President Topi, Bamir Myrteza 24-07-07 24-04-57 PDS President Moisu, Alfred (GEN) 24-07-02/24-07-07 01-12-99 PSS President Mejdani, Rexhep 24-07-97/24-07-02 17-08-44 PSS Prime Minister (11th) Berisha, Sali Prof. Dr. 11-09-05 15-10-44 PD Prime Minister (10th) Nano, Fatos 31-07-02/11-09-05 16-09-52 PSS Deputy Prime Minister Pollo, Genc 30-07-08 1963 PDRe Deputy Prime Minister Rusmajli, Ilir 11-09-05/14-11-07- 1965 PD Deputy Prime Minister Dokle, Namik 29-12-03/11-09-05 10-03-46 PSS Deputy Prime Minister Meksi, Ermelinda Ms. Prof. Dr. 18-07-03/11-09-05 1957 PSS Deputy Prime Minister Oketa, Gazmend 03-07/03-08 14-12-68 PD ALGERIA President Bouteflika, Abdelaziz 29-05-99 19-04-04 02-03-37 FLN President Zéroual, Liamine 31-01-94/27-04-99 03-07-41 none Prime Minister Ouyahia, Ahmed 23-06-08 02-07-52 RND Prime Minister Belkhadem, Abdelaziz 24-05-06/23-06-08 08-11-45 FLN Prime Minister Ouyahia, Ahmed 05-05-03/24-05-06- 02-07-52 RND ANDORRA Head of State/President of France Sarkozy, Nicolas 16-05-07 28-01-55 UMP Head of State/Bishop of Urgel Vives I Sicilia, Joan Enric 12-05-03 24-07-49 none Chief of Government Pintat Santolària.
    [Show full text]