DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix M: Forest Service Biological Evaluation and Management

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix M: Forest Service Biological Evaluation and Management Final EIS USFS Biological Evaluation Appendix M APPENDIX M—FOREST SERVICE BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION AND MANAGEMENT INDICATOR SPECIES REPORT 1 Final EIS USFS Biological Evaluation Appendix M Forest Service Biological Evaluation for the Greater Sage-Grouse Conservation Effort to Amend the Bridger-Teton and Medicine Bow National Forest Plans and the Thunder Basin National Grassland Management Plan May 13 17, 2015 Prepared by Tim Byer, Wildlife Biologist [email protected] Steve Loose, Wildlife Biologist [email protected] Katharine Haynes, Botanist [email protected] Chris Colt, Wildlife Biologist [email protected] 2 Final EIS USFS Biological Evaluation Appendix M Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 11 II. PROJECT HISTORY ........................................................................................................ 12 III. PURPOSE AND NEED ..................................................................................................... 13 IV. DESCRIPTION OF THE ALTERNATIVES .................................................................... 14 Alternative A: No-Action .......................................................................................................... 15 Alternative B: ............................................................................................................................ 15 Alternative C: ............................................................................................................................ 15 Alternative D: ............................................................................................................................ 16 Proposed Amendment (Selected Alternative): .......................................................................... 16 V. ANALYSIS AREA .................................................................................................................. 16 VI. SPECIES CONSIDERED IN THE ANALYSIS .................................................................... 17 FOREST SERVICE SENSITIVE SPECIES ............................................................................ 17 VII. SPECIES INFORMATION AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS .................................................. 39 A. Greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) ............................................................. 39 Distribution ............................................................................................................................ 39 Habitat Associations and Threats .......................................................................................... 40 Population Status and Trend .................................................................................................. 42 Key Threats by Forest............................................................................................................ 49 Evaluating Viability ............................................................................................................... 50 Alternative Comparison ......................................................................................................... 51 Alternative A - No Action ..................................................................................................... 52 Alternative B.......................................................................................................................... 60 Alternative C.......................................................................................................................... 62 Alternative D ......................................................................................................................... 65 Proposed Plan Amendment (Preferred Alternative) .............................................................. 67 B. Sagebrush Associated Species .............................................................................................. 76 Northern Goshawk (Accipiter gentilis).................................................................................. 77 Ferruginous Hawk (Buteo regalis) ........................................................................................ 78 Northern Harrier (Circus cyaneus) ........................................................................................ 79 Short-eared Owl (Asio flammeus) .......................................................................................... 80 3 Final EIS USFS Biological Evaluation Appendix M Loggerhead shrike (Lanius ludovicianus) ............................................................................. 81 Sage sparrow (Amphispiza bellii) .......................................................................................... 81 Brewer’s sparrow (Spizella brewerii) .................................................................................... 82 Columbian Sharp-tailed Grouse (Tympanuchus phasianellus) ............................................. 82 Rocky Mountain Bighorn Sheep (Ovis Canadensis canadensis) .......................................... 83 White-tailed prairie dog (Cynomys leucurus) ........................................................................ 84 Wyoming Pocket Gopher (Thomomys clusius) ..................................................................... 85 Fringed Myotis (Myotis thysanodes) ..................................................................................... 85 Townsend’s Big-eared Bat (Corynorhinus townsendii) ........................................................ 86 Spotted Bat (Euderma maculatum) ....................................................................................... 87 Hoary Bat (Lasiurus cinereus) .............................................................................................. 88 Boreal toad (Bufo boreas boreas) .......................................................................................... 88 Alternative A - No Action ..................................................................................................... 89 Alternative B.......................................................................................................................... 92 Alternative C.......................................................................................................................... 94 Alternative D ......................................................................................................................... 97 Proposed Plan Amendment (Preferred Alternative) .............................................................. 99 C. Grassland Associated Species ...................................................................................... 102 Mixed Grass Prairie ............................................................................................................. 103 Short-Grass Prairie .............................................................................................................. 103 Black-tailed Prairie Dog (Cynomys ludovicianus) .............................................................. 103 Swift Fox (Vulpes velox) ..................................................................................................... 104 Long-billed Curlew (Numenius americanus) ...................................................................... 105 Burrowing Owl (Athene cunicularia) .................................................................................. 105 Chestnut-Collared Longspur (Calicarius ornatus) .............................................................. 106 McCown’s Longspur (Calcarius mccownii) ....................................................................... 107 Mountain Plover (Charadrius montanus)............................................................................ 108 Grasshopper Sparrow (Ammodramus savannarum) ............................................................ 109 Alternative A - No Action ................................................................................................... 111 Alternative B........................................................................................................................ 113 Alternative C........................................................................................................................ 115 4 Final EIS USFS Biological Evaluation Appendix M Alternative D ....................................................................................................................... 118 Proposed Plan Amendment (Preferred Alternative) ............................................................ 120 D. Plants ............................................................................................................................ 124 Astragalus barrii (Barr’s milkvetch) .................................................................................... 124 Astragalus diversifolius var. diversifolius (Meadow milkvetch) ........................................ 125 Astragalus paysonii (Payson’s milkvetch) .......................................................................... 125 Lesquerella paysonii (Payson’s bladderpod) ....................................................................... 126 Symphyotrichum molle (Soft aster)...................................................................................... 126 Eriogonum exifolium (Dropleaf {slender leaved} buckwheat) ........................................... 127 Machaeranthera coloradoensis (Colorado tansy
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mccown's Longspur (Rhynchophanes Mccownii)
    McCown’s Longspur (Rhynchophanes mccownii ) A Species Conservation Assessment for The Nebraska Natural Legacy Project Prepared by Melissa J. Panella Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Wildlife Division November 2012 The mission of the Nebraska Natural Legacy Project is to implement a blueprint for conserving Nebraska’s flora, fauna and natural habitats through the proactive, voluntary conservation actions of partners, communities and individuals. Purpose The primary goal in development of at-risk species conservation assessments is to compile biological and ecological information that may assist conservation practitioners in making decisions regarding the conservation of species of interest. The Nebraska Natural Legacy Project recognizes the McCown’s Longspur ( Rhynchophanes mccownii ) as a Tier I at- risk species. Some general management recommendations are made here regarding the McCown’s Longspur (MCLO); however, conservation practitioners will need to use professional judgment to make specific management decisions based on objectives, location, and a multitude of variables. This resource was designed to share available knowledge of MCLO that will aid in the decision-making process or in identifying research needs for the benefit of the species. Species conservation assessments should not be stagnant documents but rather will need to be updated as new scientific information becomes available. The Nebraska Natural Legacy Project focuses efforts in the state’s Biologically Unique Landscapes (BULs), but it is recommended that whenever
    [Show full text]
  • Plants Natural Heritage and Natural Legacy Ranks 2018 Nebraska Game and Parks Commission
    Species of Greatest Conservation Need Plants Natural Heritage and Natural Legacy Ranks 2018 Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Heritage S1 and /or Legacy Tier 1 Heritage Legacy Heritage Common Name Scientific Name Srank Tier Grank White Baneberry Actaea pachypoda S1 2 G5 Ohio Buckeye Aesculus glabra var. arguta S1S2 2 G5T4?Q Lavender Giant-hyssop Agastache foeniculum S1 2 G5 Purple Giant-hyssop Agastache scrophulariifolia S1 2 G4 Pale False-dandelion Agoseris glauca var. glauca S1 2 G5T5 Spikebent Agrostis exarata var. minor S1 2 G5TNRQ Drummond's Wild Onion Allium drummondii S1 2 G5 Perennial Bursage Ambrosia tomentosa S1 2 G4 Ear-leaf Toothcup Ammannia auriculata S1 2 G5 Dwarf Indigo-bush Amorpha nana S1 2 G5 Prairie Broomweed Amphiachyris dracunculoides S1S2 2 G4G5 Pearly Everlasting Anaphalis margaritacea S1 2 G5 Hudson Bay Anemone Anemone multifida var. multifida S1 2 G5T5 Low Pussytoes Antennaria dimorpha S1 2 G5 Mountain White-camas Anticlea elegans var. elegans S1 2 G5T5 Spikenard Aralia racemosa S1 2 G5 Bearberry Arctostaphylos uva-ursi S1 2 G5 Arrowfeather Three-awn Aristida purpurascens var. purpurascens S1 2 G5T5 Carruth's Sagewort Artemisia carruthii S1 2 G4? Clasping-leaf Milkweed Asclepias amplexicaulis S1 2 G5 Antelope-Horns Asclepias asperula var. decumbens S1 2 G5TNR Field Milk-vetch Astragalus agrestis S1 2 G5 Barr’s Milkvetch Astragalus barrii S1 1 G3 Bodin's Milk-vetch Astragalus bodinii S1 2 G4 Tine-leaf Milk-vetch Astragalus pectinatus S1 2 G5 Short’s Milkvetch Astragalus shortianus S1 1 G4 Gardner's Saltbush Atriplex gardneri var. gardneri S1 2 G5TNR Texas Bergia Bergia texana S1 2 G5 Mountain Birch Betula occidentalis S1 2 G5 Sandberg's Beggar-ticks Bidens connata var.
    [Show full text]
  • U97JON08.Pdf (651.2Kb)
    ECOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF THE POTENTIAL ROCK CREEK RESEARCH NATURAL AREA WITHIN THE THUNDER BASIN NATIONAL GRASSLAND, WESTON COUNTY, WYOMING Prepared for Nebraska National Forest, USDA Forest Service By George P. Jones Wyoming Natural Diversity Database The Nature Conservancy 1604 Grand Avenue Laramie, Wyoming 82070 July 16, 1997 ECOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF THE POTENTIAL ROCK CREEK RESEARCH NATURAL AREA WITHIN THE THUNDER BASIN NATIONAL GRASSLAND, WESTON COUNTY, WYOMING Prepared for Nebraska National Forest, USDA Forest Service By George P. Jones Wyoming Natural Diversity Database I, ' The Nature Conservancy 1604 Grand Avenue Laramie, Wyoming 82070 July 16, 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION • • . • • . • . 1 ! Land Management Planning . 1 OBJECTIVES . 1 ' PRINCIPAL DISTINGUISHING FEATURES . • • 2 ' I l__ ' LOCATION • • • • • • • • 2 i I . 2 ' ' Boundary : ~ Area .• . 2 Elevation • • • • • • • • • • 2 Access • . 2 Ecoregion . • . • . • . 3 : \ Maps • . • . • . • . 3 • • 3 : AREA BY COVER TYPES ' I The Vegetation . 3 Area by Type • . 4 PHYSICAL AND CLIMATIC CONDITIONS . 5 Physical Setting . 5 DESCRIPTION OF VALUES . • . • . 5 Vegetation Types . • . • . • 5 Flora . 5 Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive Plant Species 5 Plant Species Li~t . • . • . • • . 5 Fauna . 8 I Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive Vertebrates . 8 I ' Geology . 8 'L Lands . 8 SUITABILITY FOR RESEARCH NATURAL AREA SELECTION . 8 Quality . 8 Condition . 9 Viability . 11 Defensibility . • . 12 Degree to Which the Potential RNA Meets Criteria . • • 12 IMPACTS AND POSSIBLE CONFLICTS . 12 Mineral Resources . 13 Grazing . )• . 13 Timber . 13 Watershed Values . 13 Recreation Values . 13 Wildlife and Plant Values . • . 13 Transportation Values . 13 MANAGEMENT CONCERNS 13 REFERENCES 14 Appendix 1. Maps of the potential Rock Creek Research Natural Area. 16 Appendix 2. Photographs from the potential Rock Creek Research Natural Area.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Data Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Plant Community Composition and Structure Monitoring at Badlands National Park 2019 Data Report Natural Resource Data Series NPS/BADL/NRDS—2019/1244 ON THIS PAGE The vibrant flowers of Dwarf false indigo, Amorpha nana, were seen at plot PCM_0082 in Badlands National Park this year. Photograph courtesy of the National Park Service ON THE COVER Northern Great Plains Inventory & Monitoring crew members identifying plants at a plot in Badlands National Park. Photograph courtesy of the National Park Service Plant Community Composition and Structure Monitoring at Badlands National Park 2019 Data Report Natural Resource Data Series NPS/BADL/NRDS—2019/1244 Molly B. Davis1 and Daniel J. Swanson2 1National Park Service Northern Great Plains Inventory & Monitoring Network 820 Columbus St. Rapid City, SD 57701 2National Park Service Northern Great Plains Fire Management 26611 U.S. Hwy 385 Hot Springs, SD 57747 November 2019 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Data Series is intended for the timely release of basic data sets and data summaries. Care has been taken to assure accuracy of raw data values, but a thorough analysis and interpretation of the data has not been completed.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Classification and Mapping Project Report
    USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Badlands National Par k USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Badlands National Park, South Dakota Jim Von Loh ACS Government Solutions Group Dan Cogan ACS Government Solutions Group Don Faber-Langendoen The Nature Conservancy Doug Crawford Bureau of Reclamation Michael J. Pucherelli Bureau of Reclamation November 19, 1999 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation’s Remote Sensing and GIS Group Denver Federal Center Denver, Colorado The Reclamation Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Group, organized in 1975 provides advice and assistance regarding the application of remote sensing and geographic information system (GIS) technologies to meet the spatial information needs of Bureau of Reclamation and other clients. USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Badlands National Park TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES...........................................................................................................................IV LIST OF FIGURES.......................................................................................................................... .V LIST OF CONTACTS ..................................................................................................................... VI LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS.............................................................................................................VIII ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................ IX EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • U02HEI07 Appc.Pdf (4.343Mb)
    Appendix C. Powder River County - Plant Species of Concern Table of Contents Barr's Milkvetch ............................................................................................................................ Pregnant Sedge ............................................................................................................................... 4 New Jersey tea ......................................................................................... ....................................... S Smooth Goosefoot ............................... ........................................................................................... 6 Schweinitz' Flatsedge .............................................................................................. ...................... 7 Scribner's Panic Grass ................................................................................................................... 8 Bractless Mentzelia ......................................... .............................................................................. 10 Plains Phlox .................................................. ................................................................................. I 0 Double Bladderpod ....................................................................................................................... 11 Little Indian Breadroot .................................................................................................................. 12 Literature Cited .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Badlands National Park Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Badlands National Park Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment Natural Resource Report NPS/BADL/NRR—2012/505 ON THE COVER Overlooking the Badlands Wilderness Area in Badlands National Park Photograph by: Shannon Amberg, SMUMN GSS. Badlands National Park Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment Natural Resource Report NPS/BADL/NRR—2012/505 Shannon Amberg1 Kathy Kilkus1 Sarah Gardner1 John E. Gross2 Melanie Wood2 Barry Drazkowski1 1 GeoSpatial Services Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota 700 Terrace Heights, Box #7 Winona, Minnesota 55987 2National Park Service 1201 Oakridge Drive, Suite 150 Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 April 2012 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. Views, statements, findings, conclusions, recommendations, and data in this report do not necessarily reflect views and policies of the National Park Service, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • ICBEMP Analysis of Vascular Plants
    APPENDIX 1 Range Maps for Species of Concern APPENDIX 2 List of Species Conservation Reports APPENDIX 3 Rare Species Habitat Group Analysis APPENDIX 4 Rare Plant Communities APPENDIX 5 Plants of Cultural Importance APPENDIX 6 Research, Development, and Applications Database APPENDIX 7 Checklist of the Vascular Flora of the Interior Columbia River Basin 122 APPENDIX 1 Range Maps for Species of Conservation Concern These range maps were compiled from data from State Heritage Programs in Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Utah, and Nevada. This information represents what was known at the end of the 1994 field season. These maps may not represent the most recent information on distribution and range for these taxa but it does illustrate geographic distribution across the assessment area. For many of these species, this is the first time information has been compiled on this scale. For the continued viability of many of these taxa, it is imperative that we begin to manage for them across their range and across administrative boundaries. Of the 173 taxa analyzed, there are maps for 153 taxa. For those taxa that were not tracked by heritage programs, we were not able to generate range maps. (Antmnnrin aromatica) ( ,a-’(,. .e-~pi~] i----j \ T--- d-,/‘-- L-J?.,: . ey SAP?E%. %!?:,KnC,$ESS -,,-a-c--- --y-- I -&zII~ County Boundaries w1. ~~~~ State Boundaries <ii&-----\ \m;qw,er Columbia River Basin .---__ ,$ 4 i- +--pa ‘,,, ;[- ;-J-k, Assessment Area 1 /./ .*#a , --% C-p ,, , Suecies Locations ‘V 7 ‘\ I, !. / :L __---_- r--j -.---.- Columbia River Basin s-5: ts I, ,e: I’ 7 j ;\ ‘-3 “.
    [Show full text]
  • Badlands National Park Plant Community Resource Brief
    Northern Great Plains National Park Service Inventory & Monitoring Program U.S. Department of the Interior Badlands National Park Plant Community Resource Brief 2011 Monitoring Status Objectives 1. Capture baseline data on the Overview: In 2011, the first year of green needlegrass (Nassella viridula), vegetation monitoring by the Northern 2%. status of park vegetation. Great Plains Network Inventory and 2. Document long-term trends in Monitoring staff at Badlands National The 5 most abundant native non- grasses were Nuttall’s povertyweed plant communities within the Park, efforts resulted in the documenta- park. tion of 196 plant species. We found one (Monolepis nuttalliana), 4%; fewflower buckwheat (Eriogonum pauciflorum), rare native species, Barr’s milkvetch 3. Explore the relationship between 3%; saltbush (Atriplex canescens), 2%; (Astragalus barrii). Graminoid (grass changes in plant communities and grass-like plant) species accounted curlycup gumweed (Grindelia squarro- sa), 2%; and woolly plantain (Plantago and climate change, grazing, for only 39 (20%) of the total species, fire, and other disturbances. but graminoid cover averaged 88%, patagonica), 2%. much higher than that of any other 4. Provide information to assist plant type. Forbs were much more Exotic species: Relative cover of exotic species averaged 33%, though this park managers in decision-mak- diverse, but did not provide as much ing. foliar cover. value was quite variable, ranging from 0% to 66%. In the 20 plots which were Importance Generating more than 99.9% of Earth’s biomass, plants are the primary produc- ers of the biomass that supports life on our planet. Vegetation provides food and shelter to many species and it is a large part of the scenery that visitors to NPS units come to enjoy.
    [Show full text]
  • Legumes of the North-Central States: Galegeae Stanley Larson Welsh Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1960 Legumes of the north-central states: Galegeae Stanley Larson Welsh Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Welsh, Stanley Larson, "Legumes of the north-central states: Galegeae " (1960). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 2632. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/2632 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LEGUMES OF THE NORTH-CENTRAL STATES: C-ALEGEAE by Stanley Larson Welsh A Dissertation Submitted, to the Graduate Faculty in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major Subject: Systematic Botany Approved: Signature was redacted for privacy. Signature was redacted for privacy. artment Signature was redacted for privacy. Dean of Graduat College Iowa State University Of Science and Technology Ames, Iowa I960 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS iii INTRODUCTION 1 HISTORICAL ACCOUNT 3 MATERIALS AND METHODS 8 TAXONOMIC AND NOMENCLATURE TREATMENT 13 REFERENCES 158 APPENDIX A 176 APPENDIX B 202 iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The writer wishes to express his deep gratitude to Professor Duane Isely for assistance in the selection of the problem and for the con­ structive criticisms and words of encouragement offered throughout the course of this investigation. Support through the Iowa Agricultural Experiment Station and through the Industrial Science Research Institute made possible the field work required in this problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Astragalus Barrii Barneby (Barr's Milkvetch) in the Spring
    Inventory of Astragalus barrii Barneby (Barr’s milkvetch) in the Spring Creek Unit of Thunder Basin National Grassland Prepared for: John Proctor Medicine Bow/Routt National Forests 100 N. Main Street Walden, CO 80480 Prepared by: Bonnie Heidel Wyoming Natural Diversity Database University of Wyoming Dept 3381, 1000 E. University Avenue Laramie, WY 82071 January 2004 Abstract Astragalus barrii Barneby (Barr’s milkvetch) was surveyed in the Spring Creek Unit of Thunder Basin National Grassland in May 2003 to determine its status in the Unit, to develop and implement survey techniques, and to familiarize Forest Service personnel with the species and techniques. Surveys were developed using photo-interpretation and ground-truthing. Three occurrences were documented in the Spring Creek Unit and one directly adjoining the Unit. Astragalus barrii is highly restricted in the Unit and on the landscape, where it occurs only on ridges and knolls with calcareous soils that have limited profile development. Acknowledgements The interest, support, and information provided by John Proctor (Medicine Bow National Forest) are gratefully acknowledged. Katherine Zacharkevics (Black Hills National Forest) and Kurt Statton (Medicine Bow National Forest – Douglas District), and colleagues contributed their interest and expertise to this project. Peter Ebertowski, University of Wyoming graduate student, also contributed time and survey data. Carol Tolbert (Medicine Bow National Forest) provided the most current surface ownership data for the Spring Creek Unit. Rob Thurston (Wyoming Natural Diversity Database; WYNDD) created the GIS maps used in the interim and final reporting of project results. Tessa Dutcher (WYNDD) helped process the new element occurrence records. This pilot study was conducted as a challenge cost-share between the Medicine Bow National Forest and Wyoming Natural Diversity Database.
    [Show full text]
  • James H. Locklear Lauritzen Gardens 100 Bancroft Street Omaha, Nebraska 68108, U.S.A
    ENDEMIC PLANTS OF THE CENTRAL GRASSLAND OF NORTH AMERICA: DISTRIBUTION, ECOLOGY, AND CONSERVATION STATUS James H. Locklear Lauritzen Gardens 100 Bancroft Street Omaha, Nebraska 68108, U.S.A. [email protected] ABSTRACT This paper enumerates the endemic plants of the Central Grassland of North America. The Central Grassland encompasses the full extent of the tallgrass, mixed-grass, and shortgrass prairie ecological systems of North America plus floristically related plant communities that adjoin and/or interdigitate with the midcontinental grasslands including savanna-open woodland systems, shrub-steppe, and rock outcrop communities. There are 382 plant taxa endemic to the Central Grassland, 300 endemic species (eight of which have multiple subspecific taxa endemic to the region) and 72 endemic subspecies/varieties of more widely distributed species. Nine regional concentrations of en- demic taxa were identified and are described as centers of endemism for the Central Grassland: Arkansas Valley Barrens, Edwards Plateau, Llano Estacado Escarpments, Llano Uplift, Mescalero-Monahans Dunes, Niobrara-Platte Tablelands, Raton Tablelands, Red Bed Plains, and Reverchon Rocklands. In addition to hosting localized endemics, these areas are typically enriched with more widely-distributed Central Grassland endemics as well as peripheral or disjunct occurrences of locally-rare taxa, making them regions of high floristic diversity for the Central Grassland. Most of the endemics (299 or 78%) are habitat specialists, associated with rock outcrop, sand, hydric, or riparian habi- tats. There is a strong correlation between geology and endemism in the Central Grassland, with 59% of the endemics (225 taxa) associated with rock outcrop habitat. Of the 382 Central Grassland endemics, 124 or 33% are of conservation concern (NatureServe ranking of G1/T1 to G3/T3).
    [Show full text]