DOCSLIB.ORG

Prosecution's Public Redacted Final Trial Brief

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Prosecution's Public Redacted Final Trial Brief IT-06-90-T 36885 D36885 - D36478 03 August 2010 SMS UNITED NATIONS International Tribunal for the Prosecution Case IT-0690T of Persons Responsible for Serious No. Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committedinthe Territoryof the Date 2August 2010 former Yugoslavia since 1991 IN THE TRIAL CHAMBER Before: Judge Alphons Orie, Presiding Judge Uldis Kinis Judge Elisabeth Gwaunza Registrar: Mr. John Hocking Date: 2August 2010 THE PROSECUTOR v. ANTE GOTOVINA IVAN ČERMAK MLADEN MARKAČ PUBLIC PROSECUTION’S PUBLIC REDACTED FINAL TRIAL BRIEF The Office of the Prosecutor: Mr. AlanTieger Counsel for the Accused: Mr. Luka S. Mišetić, Mr. GregoryKehoe andMr. Payam Akhavanfor Ante Gotovina Mr. StephenKayandMs. GillianHiggins for Ivan Čermak Mr. GoranMikuličić andMr. TomislavKuzmanovi} for MladenMarka~ IT-06-90-T 36884 THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA Case No. IT-0690T THE PROSECUTOR v. ANTE GOTOVINA IVAN ČERMAK MLADEN MARKAČ PUBLIC PROSECUTION’S PUBLIC REDACTED FINAL TRIAL BRIEF 1. The Prosecution hereby submits its Public Redacted Final Trial Brief with Annexes A to C. The Prosecution’s Final Trial Brief was originally filed confidentially on16July 2010. The redactions inthe Public RedactedFinal Trial Brief seektoprotect confidential material. WordCount: 43 ___________________ AlanTieger Senior Trial Attorney Datedthis 2nd dayof August 2010 The Hague, The Netherlands Case No. IT06-90T 2 2 August 2010 Public IT-06-90-T 36883 Table of Contents I. JOINT CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE .............................................................................................1 A. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................1 B. COMMON CRIMINAL PURPOSE......................................................................................................1 C. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMON CRIMINAL PURPOSE.............................................................3 1. Forcible Displacement throughthe Commission of Crimes....................................................3 Shelling Attack .............................................................................................................................. 3 Looting and Burning...................................................................................................................... 4 International Appeasement ............................................................................................................ 6 Destruction and Colonization ........................................................................................................ 8 Murderand Cruel Treatment ......................................................................................................... 9 2. Administrative Obstacles toReturn.......................................................................................12 Administrative and Bureaucratic Obstacles................................................................................. 13 No Mass Return Policy................................................................................................................ 13 Property Law Obstacles............................................................................................................... 14 (i) The Decree and Law on the Temporary Takeover of Property .......................................... 14 (ii) Law on Areas of Special State Concern ............................................................................ 16 (iii)Law on the Lease of Flats in the Liberated Territories..................................................... 16 Colonization................................................................................................................................. 17 Subsequent Efforts to Reduce the Serb Population and Block Serb Returns .............................. 18 D. KEY JCE PARTICIPANTS.............................................................................................................18 1. Tu|man ..................................................................................................................................18 2. [u{ak......................................................................................................................................22 3. Jarnjak....................................................................................................................................26 MUP Role in Addressing the Post-Storm Crime Wave............................................................... 27 Jarnjak’s Policy of Inaction ......................................................................................................... 27 Jarnjak’s Failure to Institute Meaningful Measures to Address Crimes Against Serbs and Their Property ....................................................................................................................... 28 Jarnjak’s Steps to Repress the Crime Wave Were Not Targeted at Genuinely Addressing Crimes Against Serbs............................................................................................................ 32 4. Radi} ......................................................................................................................................34 5. ^ervenko................................................................................................................................37 6. Lau{i}.....................................................................................................................................40 7. Norac andCrnjac ...................................................................................................................44 8. Ademi.....................................................................................................................................45 II. GOTOVINA ................................................................................................................................46 A. OVERVIEW OF GOTOVINA’S CRIMINAL LIABILITY .....................................................................46 1. Joint Criminal Enterprise .......................................................................................................46 2. Ordering .................................................................................................................................49 3. Planning .................................................................................................................................50 4. Instigating ..............................................................................................................................50 5. AidingandAbetting...............................................................................................................51 6. Superior Responsibility..........................................................................................................51 7. DiscriminatoryIntent.............................................................................................................52 B. GOTOVINA PLANNED, ORDERED, AND IMPLEMENTED A SHELLING ATTACK ON THE KRAJINA SERBS.......................................................................................................................................52 C. GOTOVINA TOOK NO EFFECTIVE MEASURES TO PREVENT OR STOP INDICTMENT CRIMES.........55 1. Pre-Storm Crimes...................................................................................................................56 2. Gotovina’s AttackOrder ContainedIneffective Measures toPrevent Crimes......................59 3. Gotovina’s Ineffective Response tothe Storm Crime Wave FacilitatedandEncouraged Crimes .................................................................................................................................61 4. Measures Gotovina Could Have Taken.................................................................................75 Case No. IT06-90T i 16July 2010 IT-06-90-T 36882 D. HV DISCIPLINE AND DISCIPLINARY MEASURES .........................................................................77 1. The HV MilitaryDiscipline System ......................................................................................78 2. Available Disciplinary Sanctions for Indictment Crimes ......................................................79 3. Gotovina andhis Subordinate Commanders IgnoredIndictment Crimes .............................81 4. DemobilizationWas Not a Necessaryor Reasonable Measure.............................................83 E. MILITARY POLICE.......................................................................................................................85 1. MP Dual CommandStructure................................................................................................86 Operational Line of Command .................................................................................................... 86 Professional Line of Command ................................................................................................... 87 2. Gotovina’s CommandandControl over the MP ...................................................................88 3. Defence Attempts toDenyGotovina’s Authorityover the MP Are Unpersuasive...............89 Defence Argument 1.................................................................................................................... 89 Defence Argument 2...................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hole a Remediative Approach to the Filmmaking of the Coen Brothers
    University of Dundee DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Going Down the 'Wabbit' Hole A Remediative Approach to the Filmmaking of the Coen Brothers Barrie, Gregg Award date: 2020 Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 24. Sep. 2021 Going Down the ‘Wabbit’ Hole: A Remediative Approach to the Filmmaking of the Coen Brothers Gregg Barrie PhD Film Studies Thesis University of Dundee February 2021 Word Count – 99,996 Words 1 Going Down the ‘Wabbit’ Hole: A Remediative Approach to the Filmmaking of the Coen Brothers Table of Contents Table of Figures ..................................................................................................................................... 2 Declaration ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • All Victims Matter. Reconciliation of the Balkan Faiths and Peoples: an Assessment of Recent Progress
    Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe Volume 40 Issue 10 Article 2 12-2020 All Victims Matter. Reconciliation of the Balkan Faiths and Peoples: An Assessment of Recent Progress Vjekoslav Perica University of Rijeka, Croatia Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree Part of the Christianity Commons, and the Eastern European Studies Commons Recommended Citation Perica, Vjekoslav (2020) "All Victims Matter. Reconciliation of the Balkan Faiths and Peoples: An Assessment of Recent Progress," Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe: Vol. 40 : Iss. 10 , Article 2. Available at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree/vol40/iss10/2 This Article, Exploration, or Report is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ALL VICTIMS MATTER RECONCILIATION OF BALKAN FAITHS AND PEOPLES: AN ASSESSMENT OF RECENT PROGRESS By Vjekoslav Perica Vjekoslav Perica is a Croatian-American historian, author of, among other things, Balkan Idols: Religion and Nationalism in Yugoslav States (Oxford University Press, 2002; Belgrade, 2006). His most recent publication is “Serbian Jerusalem: Inventing a Holy Land in Europe’s Periphery, 1982- 2019,” Chapter IX, in Nadim N. Rouhana and Nadera Shalhoub-Kevorkian, eds. When Politics Are Sacralized: Comparative Perspectives on Religious Claims and Nationalism (Cambridge University Press, 2020). Perica holds a Ph.D. in history from the University of Minnesota Twin Cities, USA. In the 1970s in former Yugoslavia he was a basketball player, and before the war, a jurist and journalist until coming to America in 1991.
    [Show full text]
  • Framing Croatia's Politics of Memory and Identity
    Workshop: War and Identity in the Balkans and the Middle East WORKING PAPER WORKSHOP: War and Identity in the Balkans and the Middle East WORKING PAPER Author: Taylor A. McConnell, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh Title: “KRVatska”, “Branitelji”, “Žrtve”: (Re-)framing Croatia’s politics of memory and identity Date: 3 April 2018 Workshop: War and Identity in the Balkans and the Middle East WORKING PAPER “KRVatska”, “Branitelji”, “Žrtve”: (Re-)framing Croatia’s politics of memory and identity Taylor McConnell, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh Web: taylormcconnell.com | Twitter: @TMcConnell_SSPS | E-mail: [email protected] Abstract This paper explores the development of Croatian memory politics and the construction of a new Croatian identity in the aftermath of the 1990s war for independence. Using the public “face” of memory – monuments, museums and commemorations – I contend that Croatia’s narrative of self and self- sacrifice (hence “KRVatska” – a portmanteau of “blood/krv” and “Croatia/Hrvatska”) is divided between praising “defenders”/“branitelji”, selectively remembering its victims/“žrtve”, and silencing the Serb minority. While this divide is partially dependent on geography and the various ways the Croatian War for Independence came to an end in Dalmatia and Slavonia, the “defender” narrative remains preeminent. As well, I discuss the division of Croatian civil society, particularly between veterans’ associations and regional minority bodies, which continues to disrupt amicable relations among the Yugoslav successor states and places Croatia in a generally undesired but unshakable space between “Europe” and the Balkans. 1 Workshop: War and Identity in the Balkans and the Middle East WORKING PAPER Table of Contents Abstract ...................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gotovina Et Al Judgement Volume II
    IT-06-90-T 38520 D38520 - D37937 International Tribunal for the UNITED Case No. IT-06-90-T Prosecution of Persons Responsible for NATIONS Serious Violations of International Date: 15 April 2011 Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia Original: English since 1991 IN TRIAL CHAMBER I Before: Judge Alphons Orie, Presiding Judge Uldis Ėinis Judge Elizabeth Gwaunza Registrar: Mr John Hocking Judgement of: 15 April 2011 PROSECUTOR v. ANTE GOTOVINA IVAN ČERMAK MLADEN MARKAČ PUBLIC ______________________________________________________________________ JUDGEMENT VOLUME II OF II ______________________________________________________________________ Office of the Prosecutor Counsel for Ante Gotovina Mr Alan Tieger Mr Luka Mišetić Mr Stefan Waespi Mr Gregory Kehoe Ms Prashanti Mahindaratne Mr Payam Akhavan Ms Katrina Gustafson Mr Edward Russo Counsel for Ivan Čermak Mr Saklaine Hedaraly Mr Ryan Carrier Mr Steven Kay, QC Ms Gillian Higgins Counsel for Mladen Markač Mr Goran Mikuličić Mr Tomislav Kuzmanović 38519 Table of contents General abbreviations 7 1. Introduction 9 2. Sources and use of evidence 13 3. The Accused 37 3.1 Ante Gotovina and the Split Military District 37 3.1.1 Position of Ante Gotovina within the Split Military District 37 3.1.2 Ante Gotovina's powers as a commander 52 3.2 Ivan Čermak and the Knin garrison 73 3.3 Mladen Markač and the Special Police 86 4. Crimes committed in municipalities (July-September 1995) 105 4.1 Murders 105 4.1.1 Overview of the charges 105 4.1.2 Benkovac municipality 106 4.1.3
    [Show full text]
  • Elijah Siegler, Coen. Framing Religion in Amoral Order Baylor University Press, 2016
    Christian Wessely Elijah Siegler, Coen. Framing Religion in Amoral Order Baylor University Press, 2016 I would hardly seem the most likely candidate to review a book on the Coen brothers. I have not seen all of their films, and the ones I saw … well, either I did not understand them or they are really as shallow as I thought them to be. With one exception: I did enjoy O Brother, Where Art Thou? (2000). And I like A Serious Man (2009). So, two exceptions. And, of course, True Grit (2010) – so, all in all three exceptions1 … come to think of it, there are more that have stuck in my mind in a positive way, obfuscated by Barton Fink (1991) or Burn After Reading (2008). Therefore, I was curious wheth- er Elijah Siegler’s edited collection would change my view on the Coens. Having goog- led for existing reviews of the book that might inspire me, I discovered that none are to be found online, apart from the usual flattery in four lines on the website of Baylor University Press, mostly phrases about the unrivalled quality of Siegler’s book. Turns out I have do all the work by myself. Given that I am not familiar with some of the films used to exemplify some of this book’s theses, I will be brief on some chapters and give more space to those that deal with the films I know. FORMAL ASPECTS Baylor University Press is well established in the fields of philosophy, religion, theol- ogy, and sociology. So far, they have scarcely published in the media field, although personally I found two of their books (Sacred Space, by Douglas E.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorial of the Republic of Croatia
    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE CASE CONCERNING THE APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE (CROATIA v. YUGOSLAVIA) MEMORIAL OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA APPENDICES VOLUME 5 1 MARCH 2001 II III Contents Page Appendix 1 Chronology of Events, 1980-2000 1 Appendix 2 Video Tape Transcript 37 Appendix 3 Hate Speech: The Stimulation of Serbian Discontent and Eventual Incitement to Commit Genocide 45 Appendix 4 Testimonies of the Actors (Books and Memoirs) 73 4.1 Veljko Kadijević: “As I see the disintegration – An Army without a State” 4.2 Stipe Mesić: “How Yugoslavia was Brought Down” 4.3 Borisav Jović: “Last Days of the SFRY (Excerpts from a Diary)” Appendix 5a Serb Paramilitary Groups Active in Croatia (1991-95) 119 5b The “21st Volunteer Commando Task Force” of the “RSK Army” 129 Appendix 6 Prison Camps 141 Appendix 7 Damage to Cultural Monuments on Croatian Territory 163 Appendix 8 Personal Continuity, 1991-2001 363 IV APPENDIX 1 CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS1 ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THE CHRONOLOGY BH Bosnia and Herzegovina CSCE Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe CK SKJ Centralni komitet Saveza komunista Jugoslavije (Central Committee of the League of Communists of Yugoslavia) EC European Community EU European Union FRY Federal Republic of Yugoslavia HDZ Hrvatska demokratska zajednica (Croatian Democratic Union) HV Hrvatska vojska (Croatian Army) IMF International Monetary Fund JNA Jugoslavenska narodna armija (Yugoslav People’s Army) NAM Non-Aligned Movement NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organisation
    [Show full text]
  • English Translation Integra
    GUIDANCE FOR RETURNEES TO CROATIA 1 December 2004 1 GUIDANCE FOR RETURNEES TO CROATIA OSCE Mission to Croatia Author of publication OSCE Mission to Croatia Publisher OSCE Mission to Croatia Editor OSCE Mission to Croatia Cover design and graphic design Zoran itnik English translation Integra Copies 500 Print Columna, Split Tijardoviæeva 16 ISBN 953-99674-3-0 CIP - Katalogizacija u publikaciji Nacionalna i sveuèilina knjinica - Zagreb UDK 364.65-054.75(497.5)(036) 342.726-054.75(497.5)(036) ORGANISATION for Security and Cooperation in Europe. Mission to Croatia Guidance for returnees to Croatia /<author of publication OSCE Mission to Croatia>. - Zagreb : OSCE Mission to Croatia, 2004. Izv. stv. nasl.: Vodiè za povratnike u Republiku Hrvatsku. ISBN 953-99674-3-0 I. Povratnici -- Hrvatska -- Pravna regulativa -- Vodiè 2 441201173 TABLE OF CONTENT Introduction 5 State housing for former holders of occupancy/tenancy rights outside the area of special state concern 7 State housing for former holders of occupancy/tenancy right and others inside the Area of Special State Concern 12 Repossession of property 14 Housing care for owners of damaged private property 17 Looting 19 State Obligation to compensate use of private property 21 Reconstruction of damaged and destroyed properties 26 Compensation for damage caused by armed forces and police and for damage caused by terrorist acts 28 Convalidation/Pension issues 30 Status rights 32 Areas of Special State Concern 34 List of ODPR offices 37 List of OSCE offices 39 List of UNHCR offices 41 3 GUIDANCE FOR RETURNEES TO CROATIA 4 INTRODUCTION Dear readers, The OSCE Mission to Croatia has recognized the need for additional return related information to be provided through the distribution of guidance for return- ees, refugees, expelled and displaced persons.
    [Show full text]
  • A Serious Man (2009)
    A Serious Man (2009) “Receive with simplicity everything that happens” --Rashi Major Credits: Directors: Joel and Ethan Coen Script: Joel and Ethan Coean Cinematography: Roger Deakins Editing: Roderick Jaynes (pseudonym for Joel and Ethan Coen) Music: Carter Burwell Cast: Michael Stuhlbarg (Larry Gopnik); Richard Kind (Uncle Arthur); Fred Melamed (Sy Abelman); Sari Lennick (Judith Gopnik); Amy Landecker (Mrs. Samsky) Background: Following the success of No Country for Old Men (2007), the Coen brothers felt free to return to an uncharacteristically personal story that they had been thinking about for many years. Set in 1967 in an upper Midwest suburbia like the one outside Minneapolis in which they were raised, A Serious Man draws upon Joel’s and Ethan’s memories as it re-tells the Biblical tale of Job. Although generally praised by critics (earning a Best Picture nomination from the Academy under its newly expanded system of selecting ten movies instead of five), the film, perhaps not surprisingly, did not generate the same buzz as their multiple Oscar-winning Western. Nevertheless, it remains one of their most skillfully crafted works, one that manages to be both painfully funny and deeply disturbing. Its reputation will almost surely grow. Cinematic Elements: 1. The Yiddish prologue, with its narrowed frame, sepia tone, and focused lighting, evokes both the style of silent movies and the vernacular language and storytelling of the Yiddish theatre. Although the Coens have explicitly denied any relevance to the modern story, the prologue clearly resonates with the themes and tone of the rest of A Serious Man. 2. Music: The Coens again collaborate with their favorite composer, Carter Burwell, and the film’s eclectic score—from the Jefferson Airplane’s “Don’t You Want Somebody to Love” to Sidor Belarsky’s melancholy Yiddish song “The Miller’s Tears”—reinforces the film’s shifts from hallucination and dream to comedy and melodrama.
    [Show full text]
  • Security Council Distr
    UNITED NATIONS Security Council Distr. GENERAL S/1997/195 5 March 1997 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH FURTHER REPORT ON THE SITUATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN CROATIA PURSUANT TO SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 1019 (1995) I. INTRODUCTION 1. The present report provides updated information to the Security Council on the situation of human rights in Croatia, with specific reference to the progress of measures taken by the Government of the Republic of Croatia to implement Security Council resolutions 1009 (1995) and 1019 (1995) and presidential statement S/PRST/1996/48 of 20 December 1996. Those resolutions followed Croatia's military recovery of control in May and August 1995 of formerly Serb-controlled areas of its territory, located in the Western Slavonia and Krajina regions, which had been designated United Nations Protected Areas (UNPAs) and were known as Sectors West, North and South. 2. In resolutions 1009 (1995) and 1019 (1995), the Security Council demanded of the Government of Croatia that it respect fully the rights of the local Serb population in the former Sectors, including the right to remain, leave or return in safety, take urgent measures to put an end to all violations of international humanitarian law and human rights in the areas and investigate all reports of such violations so that those responsible could be judged and punished. In its presidential statement of 20 December 1996, the Security Council, inter alia. acknowledged notable progress in the humanitarian situation in those regions. Concerning the right to personal security, the Council observed that, while the security situation had improved slightly, there remained cause for concern about continued acts of harassment, looting and physical attacks against Croatian Serbs and, in particular, about involvement by Croatian uniformed military and police officials in a number of those incidents.
    [Show full text]
  • Sponzorstva I Pokroviteljstva 2018. Godina RED
    Sponzorstva i pokroviteljstva 2018. godina RED. NAZIV UDRUGE OIB ODOBENI BROJ IZNOS 1. VSNM OPĆINA ERVENIKI 68055158234 5.000,00 2. UDRUGA ŽENA KOSOVSKE 79896958112 4.000,00 DOLINE 3. VSNM OPĆINA KISTANJE 86182487115 5.000,00 4. AKU BONACA 83298438611 2.000,00 5. DRUŠTVO ŠIBENČANA I 90076107478 5.000,00 PRIJATELJA ŠIBENIKA 6. UDRUGA KAMPANEL 1861. 91277900368 14.000,00 KOPRNO 7. ZAJEDNICA HRVATA BIH ŠKŽ 61518223486 5.000,00 8. POČASNI BLEIBURŠKI VOD 00963425579 10.000,00 ZAGREB 9. UDRUGA VETERANA ZNG IV. 87490550699 6.000,00 BRIGADE ŠKŽ KNIN 10. KUD DINARA KIJEVO 07917876108 3.000,00 11. KUD SV. ILIJA KLJACI 725932757795 4.000,00 12. MNK DUBRAVA 36762414039 2.000,00 13. KLAPA ZVONO KISTANJE 89173579289 4.000,00 14. LIKOVNJA UDRUGA „GRUPA 97224648896 1.000,00 9“ 15. ŠIBENSKA GRADSKA STRAŽA 54000993716 2.000,00 16. ZAJEDNICA UDRUGA KLAPA 76623834255 5.000,00 ŠKŽ 17. SAVEZ SPORTSKE REKREACIJE 04159228872 2.000,00 SPORT ZA SVE ŠKŽ 18. AUTO KLUB MIHOVIL ŠIBENIK 44206323912 5.000,00 19. PLANINARSKO DRUŠTVO 27878844707 3.000,00 PROMINA DRNIŠ 20. VITEŠKO ALKARSKO DRUŠTVO 15656934984 6.250,00 21. ZAJEDNICA SPORTOVA 52069831441 9.000,00 GRADA KNINA 22. SPORTSKA REKREATIVNA 12514876943 3.000,00 UDRUGA SLANICA 23. BOĆARSKI KLUB SONKOVIĆ 90653810592 2000,00 24. MNK GAĆELEZI 17503234970 2.000,00 25. KLUB SJEDEĆE ODBOJKE KNIN 90416098769 3.000,00 26. UNHNR SINOVI OLUJE KNIN 85932549218 2.000,00 27. MOTOCIKLISTIČKI KLUB 62155486702 5.000,00 OLUJNI JAHAČI 28. TURISTIČKA ZAJEDNICA 21448353289 4.000,00 OPĆINE TRIBUNJ 29. GRAFOMARK TISKARA 63856599536 1.000,00 30.
    [Show full text]
  • Službeni Vjesnik Šibensko-Kninske Županije, God. 2020, Broj 16
    SLUŽBENI VJESNIK ŠIBENSKO-KNINSKE ŽUPANIJE SLUŽBENO GLASILO ŠIBENSKO-KNINSKE ŽUPANIJE Godište XXVII. Šibenik, 14. prosinca 2020. Broj 16 ISSN 1846-0151 SADRŽAJ I. i članova/ca Općinskog vijeća izabranih na kandidaci- OPĆINA BISKUPIJA jskim listama grupa birača za razdoblje od 01.siječnja OPĆINSKO VIJEĆE do 31. prosinca 2020.godine ................................... 27 20. ODLUKA o prijedlogu kandidata za suca po- 23. PRORAČUN Općine Biskupija za 2021. go- rotnika ..................................................................... 28 dine i projekcije za 2022. i 2023. godinu .................. 3 21. PLAN djelovanja u području prirodnih nepogo- 24. ODLUKA o izvršenju proračuna Općine Bisk- da za područje Općine Ervenik za 2021. godinu ......... upija za 2021. godinu .............................................. 12 ................................................................................. 28 25. ODLUKA o poništenju Odluke o raspisivanju izbora za članove vijeća mjesnih odbora na području Općine Biskupija ..................................................... 14 III. 26. PROGRAM održavanja komunalne infrastruk- ture u 2021. godini .................................................. 14 OPĆINA KISTANJE 27. PROGRAM građenja komunalne infrastrukture OPĆINSKO VIJEĆE u 2021. godini ......................................................... 16 28. PROGRAM javnih potreba u kulturi Općine 52. ODLUKA o donošenju Prvih izmjena i dopuna Biskupija za 2021. godinu ....................................... 18 Proračuna Općine Kistanje za 2020. godinu
    [Show full text]
  • Et Tu, Dude? Humor and Philosophy in the Movies of Joel And
    ET TU, DUDE? HUMOR AND PHILOSOPHY IN THE MOVIES OF JOEL AND ETHAN COEN A Report of a Senior Study by Geoffrey Bokuniewicz Major: Writing/Communication Maryville College Spring, 2014 Date approved ___________, by _____________________ Faculty Supervisor Date approved ___________, by _____________________ Division Chair Abstract This is a two-part senior thesis revolving around the works of the film writer/directors Joel and Ethan Coen. The first seven chapters deal with the humor and philosophy of the Coens according to formal theories of humor and deep explication of their cross-film themes. Though references are made to most of their films in the study, the five films studied most in-depth are Fargo, The Big Lebowski, No Country for Old Men, Burn After Reading, and A Serious Man. The study looks at common structures across both the Coens’ comedies and dramas and also how certain techniques make people laugh. Above all, this is a study on the production of humor through the lens of two very funny writers. This is also a launching pad for a prospective creative screenplay, and that is the focus of Chapter 8. In that chapter, there is a full treatment of a planned script as well as a significant portion of written script up until the first major plot point. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Chapter - Introduction VII I The Pattern Recognition Theory of Humor in Burn After Reading 1 Explanation and Examples 1 Efficacy and How It Could Help Me 12 II Benign Violation Theory in The Big Lebowski and 16 No Country for Old Men Explanation and Examples
    [Show full text]