DOCSLIB.ORG

205 and N205 Consultation Report January 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
205 and N205 Consultation Report January 2015 Consultation on possible changes to bus routes 205 and N205 Consultation Report January 2015 1 2 Consultation on possible changes to bus routes 205 and N205 Consultation Report 3 Contents 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 2 2 The consultation ............................................................................................................. 2 3 Responses from members of the public ......................................................................... 3 4 Responses from statutory bodies and other stakeholders .............................................. 6 Appendices Appendix A – Copy of the consultation leaflet ....................................................................... 7 Appendix B – List of stakeholders consulted ...................................................................... 10 1 1. Introduction Transport for London recently consulted stakeholders and the public about a proposal to permanently reroute routes 205 and N205 along Great Eastern Street and Bishopsgate. The consultation took place from 26 September to 7 November 2014. Since July 2013, routes 205 and N205 have been on diversion between Old Street and Houndsditch along Great Eastern Street and Bishopsgate because of Crossrail works at Moorgate. The routes previously ran along the southern part of City Road and London Wall. The diversion gives useful links to Shoreditch and the north of the City of London. Weekday usage on the diverted section between Old Street Station and Houndsditch has risen compared to the previous routeing via Moorgate. We are therefore proposing to make the current diversion route permanent. The proposal means that routes 205 and N205 would no longer serve City Road, Finsbury Square, Moorgate, South Place, Eldon Street, Blomfield Street, London Wall and Wormwood Street. About 800 passengers per weekday had their direct bus trips broken by the diversion, mostly to or from Moorgate or Finsbury Square. Route 214 will continue to link Finsbury Square with Angel and King’s Cross, and route 43 links Moorgate, Finsbury Square and Angel. Both these are 24-hour routes. This report explains the background to the proposal, the consultation and summarises the responses. It will contribute to the decision on whether to go ahead with this proposed change or not. 2. The consultation The consultation was designed to enable TfL to understand local opinion about the proposed changes to routes 205 and N205. The potential outcomes of the consultation are: We decide the consultation raises no issues that should prevent us from proceeding with the scheme as originally planned. We modify the scheme in response to issues raised in consultation. We abandon the scheme as a result of issues raised in the consultation. 2.1 Consultation objectives The objectives of the consultation were: To give stakeholders and the public easily-understandable information about the proposals and allow them to respond To understand the level of support or opposition for the change To understand any issues that might affect the proposal of which we were not previously aware To understand concerns and objections To allow respondents to make suggestions. 2.2 Who we consulted The consultation intended to seek the views of people who use the bus routes involved and those who might potentially use the service. We also consulted stakeholders including the affected Councils, traffic police, London TravelWatch, Members of Parliament, Assembly Members and local interest groups. A list of the stakeholders we consulted is shown in Appendix B and a summary of their responses is given in Section 4. 2 2.3 Consultation material, distribution and publicity The consultation was published online. The dedicated webpage explained the background to the proposal. We invited people to respond by answering a number of questions and leaving comments. We raised awareness of the consultation by sending an email to approximately 14,000 registered Oyster Card holders who have used routes 205 and/or N205, and to key stakeholders. We also put up posters at bus stops served by the routes. Copies of the consultation materials are shown in Appendix A. People were invited to respond to the consultation using a variety of methods. They could respond via our freepost address (FREEPOST TFL CONSULTATIONS), by emailing [email protected] or by accessing the online consultation where they could let us know their views. 3 Responses from members of the public We received a total of 643 responses. There were 639 responses via the website and four via email. 3.1 Public consultation results To help us understand more about who replied and their thoughts on the route and proposal, we asked a number of questions; We asked respondents whether they currently use routes 205 and N205. Do you use route 205? 650 600 550 500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Yes No Not answered Total Number of replies 606 22 15 643 % of total 94.3 3.4 2.3 100 3 Do you use route N205? 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Yes No Not answered Total Number of replies 347 284 12 643 % of total 53.9 44.2 1.9 100 Respondents were asked to give us their views on our proposals for routes 205 and N205. Are you in favour of this proposal for route 205? 550 500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Yes No No opinion Not answered Total Number of replies 510 115 10 8 643 % of total 79.3 17.9 1.6 1.2 100 4 Are you in favour of this proposal for route N205? 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Yes No No opinion Not answered Total Number of replies 404 76 155 8 643 % of total 62.8 11.8 24.1 1.3 100 3.2 Additional comments Respondents were given the opportunity to provide further comments about our proposal. Of the 643 responses, 317 provided comments. The tables below summarise the views and suggestions made. A separate document will respond to the main points raised by respondents. Number of Comments and suggestions times raised Generally supportive This provides a useful bus link to Shoreditch 53 Moorgate/City Road are already adequately served by other routes 26 This will help ease congestion at Liverpool Street/Moorgate 3 Proposed route makes access to Liverpool Street station easier 2 Passengers who need to travel to Moorgate can use Tube/train 1 Generally against The proposal will mean less bus links to Moorgate/City Road 12 The route via Shoreditch takes longer than the old route via 5 Moorgate, particularly at peak times This proposal will increase congestion on Bishopsgate 4 Route 135 already provides an alternative to the proposed 205 route 3 This will mean there is no bus route from Moorgate towards 2 Whitechapel Holywell Lane is too narrow for buses 2 This will mean there is no direct bus link from Paddington to the City 1 5 N205 is already very busy. Rerouting via Shoreditch may make it 1 worse Proposed route makes access to Liverpool Street station more 1 difficult There are already a multitude of bus routes that go past Liverpool St 1 station and into the Shoreditch area Passengers wanting to go to Shoreditch can change at Old Street 1 The bus stops in Shoreditch are rarely used 1 Existing service/reliability Increase frequency of route 205 16 Can the 214 serve Liverpool Street station again? 6 Can route 214 be more frequent and/or have double deck buses? 5 Increase frequency of route N205 3 Install an additional bus stop on Bishopsgate outside the Heron 2 Tower Too many eastbound buses on route 205 terminate at 1 Aldgate/Whitechapel/Mile End Routeing suggestions Run route 205 along Commercial Road to Aldgate instead of going 4 via Houndsditch and Bishopsgate Extend route 205 to Stratford 2 Keep the old routeing and provide a new bus route to serve Great 2 Eastern Street and Bishopsgate 205 should run via Shoreditch Town Hall instead of Great Eastern 1 Street. Change the route so that it only runs between Bow and City Road 1 If this proposal goes ahead route 135 could terminate at Aldgate or 1 Liverpool Street A bus link from Paddington/Kings Cross to Hackney Road or Bethnal 1 Green would be better Will the former 205 route be covered by another route? 1 Would like to have a direct bus route from Caledonian Road to 1 Liverpool street 4 Responses from statutory bodies and other stakeholders We received one response from stakeholders, shown below. London Borough of Hackney Hackney Council welcomes this proposal. The City of London and the London Boroughs of Islington and Tower Hamlets were also consulted, but did not respond. 6 Appendix A – Copy of the consultation material Bus Stop notice 7 Email to Oyster Card holders We sent an email to registered oyster card holders who have specified they use either route 205 or N205. The email was issued to 14,314 people on 1 October 2014 and provided a link to our consultation page. Respondents were asked to review our proposals on consultation webpage. Respondents were able to reply online. Details of the responses are set out in section 3 8 Copy of the consultation webpage 9 Appendix B – List of stakeholders consulted London TravelWatch Elected Members Caroline Pidgeon AM Darren Johnson AM Gareth Bacon AM Jenny Jones AM Murad Qureshi AM Nicky Gavron AM Andrew Boff AM Victoria Borwick AM Tom Copley AM Stephen Knight AM Fiona Twycross AM Joanne McCartney AM John Biggs AM Jennette Arnold AM Rushanara Ali MP Meg Hillier MP Mark Field MP Cllr William Dove Bishopsgate ward Cllr Simon D'Olier Duckworth Bishopsgate ward Cllr Stanley Ginsburg Bishopsgate ward Cllr Wendy Hyde Bishopsgate
Load more

Recommended publications
  • City Villages: More Homes, Better Communities, IPPR
    CITY VILLAGES MORE HOMES, BETTER COMMUNITIES March 2015 © IPPR 2015 Edited by Andrew Adonis and Bill Davies Institute for Public Policy Research ABOUT IPPR IPPR, the Institute for Public Policy Research, is the UK’s leading progressive thinktank. We are an independent charitable organisation with more than 40 staff members, paid interns and visiting fellows. Our main office is in London, with IPPR North, IPPR’s dedicated thinktank for the North of England, operating out of offices in Newcastle and Manchester. The purpose of our work is to conduct and publish the results of research into and promote public education in the economic, social and political sciences, and in science and technology, including the effect of moral, social, political and scientific factors on public policy and on the living standards of all sections of the community. IPPR 4th Floor 14 Buckingham Street London WC2N 6DF T: +44 (0)20 7470 6100 E: [email protected] www.ippr.org Registered charity no. 800065 This book was first published in March 2015. © 2015 The contents and opinions expressed in this collection are those of the authors only. CITY VILLAGES More homes, better communities Edited by Andrew Adonis and Bill Davies March 2015 ABOUT THE EDITORS Andrew Adonis is chair of trustees of IPPR and a former Labour cabinet minister. Bill Davies is a research fellow at IPPR North. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The editors would like to thank Peabody for generously supporting the project, with particular thanks to Stephen Howlett, who is also a contributor. The editors would also like to thank the Oak Foundation for their generous and long-standing support for IPPR’s programme of housing work.
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Council, 03/10/2018 19:30
    Public Document Pack Lewisham Council Members Members of the committee, listed below, are summoned to attend the meeting to be held on Wednesday, 3 October 2018. Ian Thomas, Chief Executive September 25 2018 Mayor Damien Egan Councillor Obajimi Adefiranye Councillor Abdeslam Amrani Councillor Tauseef Anwar Councillor Chris Barnham Councillor Paul Bell Councillor Peter Bernards Councillor Chris Best Councillor Kevin Bonavia Councillor Andre Bourne Councillor Bill Brown Councillor Juliet Campbell Members of the public are welcome to attend committee meetings. However, occasionally, committees may have to consider some business in private. Copies of agendas, minutes and reports are available on request in Braille, in large print, on audio tape, on computer disk or in other languages. Councillor Suzannah Clarke Councillor Patrick Codd Councillor Tom Copley Councillor Liam Curran Councillor Janet Daby Councillor Brenda Dacres Councillor Sophie Davis Councillor Amanda De Ryk Councillor Joe Dromey Councillor Colin Elliott Councillor Alex Feis-Bryce Councillor Aisling Gallagher Councillor Leo Gibbons Councillor Alan Hall Councillor Carl Handley Councillor Octavia Holland Councillor Sue Hordijenko Councillor Coral Howard Councillor Mark Ingleby Councillor Liz Johnston-Franklin Councillor Caroline Kalu Councillor Silvana Kelleher Councillor Louise Krupski Councillor Jim Mallory Councillor Paul Maslin Councillor Sophie McGeevor Members of the public are welcome to attend committee meetings. However, occasionally, committees may have to consider
    [Show full text]
  • London Plan 2004
    Other formats and languages For a large print, Braille, disc, sign language video or audio-tape version of this document or its summary, please contact us at the address below: Public Liaison Unit Greater London Authority Telephone 020 7983 4100 City Hall www.london.gov.uk The Queen’s Walk London SE1 2AA You will need to supply your name, your postal address and state the format and title of the publication you require. The London Plan Spatial Development Strategy for Greater London If you would like a copy of the summary of this document in your language, please phone the number or contact us at the Plan The London address above. Chinese Hindi Spatial Development Strategy for Greater London Greater for Spatial Development Strategy Vietnamese Bengali Greek Urdu Turkish Arabic Punjabi Gujarati February 2004 City Hall www.london.gov.uk The Queen’s Walk Enquiries 020 7983 4100 London SE1 2AA Minicom 020 7983 4458 MoL/Feb 04/CJ D&P/MT/448A The London Plan Spatial Development Strategy for Greater London February 2004 copyright Greater London Authority February 2004 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 ISBN 1 85261 544 3 Cover photograph Adam Hinton This document is printed on 50 per cent post consumer recycled paper, 50 per cent totally chlorine free pulp, and printed with vegetable oil based inks. Acknowlegements The Mayor would like to thank everyone who contributed to this plan including the Independent Panel, all participants at the Examination in Public and everyone else who responded to the public consultation.
    [Show full text]
  • New-Build `Gentrification' and London's Riverside Renaissance
    Environment and Planning A 2005, volume 37, pages 1165 ^ 1190 DOI:10.1068/a3739 New-build `gentrification' and London's riverside renaissance Mark Davidson, Loretta Lees Department of Geography, King's College London, Strand, London WC2R 2LS, England; e-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Received 3 February 2004; in revised form 5 August 2004 Abstract. In a recent conference paper Lambert and Boddy (2002) questioned whether new-build residential developments in UK city centres were examples of gentrification. They concluded that this stretched the term too far and coined `residentialisation' as an alternative term. In contrast, we argue in this paper that new-build residential developments in city centres are examples of gentrification. We argue that new-build gentrification is part and parcel of the maturation and mutation of the gentrification process during the post-recession era. We outline the conceptual cases for and against new-build `gentrification', then, using the case of London's riverside renaissance, we find in favour of the case for. ``In the last decade the designer apartment blocks built by corporate developers for elite consumption have become as characteristic of gentrified landscapes as streetscapes of lovingly restored Victorian terraces. As gentrification continues to progress and exhibit new forms and patterns, it seems unnecessary to confine the concept to residential rehabilitation.'' Shaw (2002, page 44) 1 Introduction Recent gentrification research has begun to highlight the challenges that current waves of gentrification pose towards its conceptualisation (Lees, 2003a; Slater, 2004). In the last decade gentrification has matured and its processes are operating in a new economic, cultural, social, and political environment.
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Mayors Report to Council Agenda Supplement for Council, 30
    Meeting of the COUNCIL __________________________________ Wednesday, 30 September 2020 at 7.00 p.m. _______________________________________ SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ______________________________________ PAGE WARD(S) NUMBER AFFECTED 14. MAYOR'S REPORT The Council’s Constitution provides for the Elected Mayor 3 - 24 to give a report at each Ordinary Council Meeting. "If the fire alarm sounds please leave the building immediately by the nearest available fire exit, to which a Fire Warden will direct you. Please do not use the lifts. Please do not deviate to collect personal belongings or vehicles parked in the complex. If you are unable to use the stairs, a member of staff will direct you to a safe area. On leaving the building, please proceed directly to the Fire Assembly Point situated by the lake on Saffron Avenue. No person must re-enter the building until instructed that it is safe to do so by the Senior Fire Marshall. The meeting will reconvene if it is safe to do so, otherwise it will stand adjourned." If you require any further information relating to this meeting, would like to request a large print, Braille or audio version of this document, or would like to discuss access arrangements or any other special requirements, please contact: Matthew Mannion, Head of Democratic ServicesPage 1 Tel: 020 7364 4651, E-mail:[email protected] This page is intentionally left blank Agenda Item 14 Mayor’s Report to Council 30th September 2020 John Biggs, Mayor of Tower Hamlets Key Events/Announcements Covid-19 This is our first council meeting since March, and in that time Covid-19 has had a massive impact on all of us.
    [Show full text]
  • 2001 GA Ann Report.A/W
    Printed by Seacourt Press Limited on recycled paper made from 75% de-inked post consumer waste and a maximum of 25% mill broke. Seacourt have EMAS and ISO14001 accreditation, are members of the waterless printing association and their carbon emissions are offset. EMAS registration number UK-5-0000073. annual report 2000/01 our mission Green Alliance exists to promote sustainable development by ensuring that the environment is at the heart of decision-making We work with senior people in government, parliament, business and the environment movement to encourage new ideas, dialogue and constructive solutions. Green Alliance has three main aims: > to make the environment a central political issue > to integrate the environment effectively in public policy and decision-making > to stimulate new thinking and advance the environmental agenda into new areas The publication of this report has been supported by Severn Trent plc and the DEFRA Environmental Action Fund chair’s report Green Alliance’s increased strategic focus over the past two years is paying dividends. Our efforts to engage the Prime Minister and his officials on the environment succeeded, with Tony Blair’s speech to a Green Alliance/CBI audience in October 2000. This was by no means the end of a process, but opened a new dialogue between the Prime Minister and environment groups. Another success was the publication of our detailed, consensual work on the role of negotiated agreements between government and business. This charts a course through opposing views, laying down a model of best practice of which government, business and NGOs can feel ownership. Two Green Alliance pamphlets received considerable attention.
    [Show full text]
  • London Assembly (Mayor’S Question Time) – 21 October 2015
    Appendix 1 London Assembly (Mayor’s Question Time) – 21 October 2015 Transcript of Agenda Item 4 – Oral Update on the Report of the Mayor Jennette Arnold OBE AM (Chair): Mayor, do you need five minutes to update us on any matters? Boris Johnson MP (Mayor of London): I do not know how long I need, but I will give you a quick report, Jennette. Just to remind the Assembly, we have had a record number of affordable homes but also in the last few weeks I was able to announce that 52,000 Londoners on modest incomes have moved into part-buy/part-rent homes. These are incredibly important because so many Londoners want to get a share in the value of their home. I went to see a fantastic project up at Waltham Forest at Gallery Court in Fulbourne Road where there are about 124 mixed-tenure apartments. The average starting outlay is about £63,750. We have deposits for as little as £5,000, averaging £13,000 for the deposit for the purchase. Average household wages for these homes are about £37,000. If you can imagine two people with a collective income of £37,000, it is really within Londoners’ reach. That was a wonderful project to see. We have launched a report on the dynamism of London’s creative industries, which are now worth almost £35 billion to the economy. That seems to have more than doubled. The last figure I used to use was £16 billion and so it seems to have gone up massively.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    43rd Mayor’s Report to the Assembly Mayor’s Question Time – 16th July 2020 This is my forty-third report to the Assembly, fulfilling my duty under Section 45 of the Greater London Authority Act 1999. It covers the period from 5th June – 2nd July 2020. Please note that the information in the Mayor’s Report is accurate at the time of publishing. Executive Summary COVID-19 Update Thanks to the efforts and sacrifice of the overwhelming majority of Londoners and the dedication of London’s key workers, the prevalence of the virus in our city has continued to fall in the last few weeks. I am proud of what London has achieved, and especially thankful to the workers who have protected us and kept our city going through this difficult period. Significant steps are now being taken across the country to ease the lockdown, including the reopening of many more businesses on 4 July. This will be welcomed by Londoners and London businesses alike, many of which I know have really strong measures in place to help keep people safe. We have structures in London to help make sure these latest steps run smoothly. The Strategic Coordination Group continues its work across London’s response agencies, the London Transition Board has now met twice, and the London Recovery Board is also now established, to look at the medium and long-term recovery. But it’s now more important than ever that we remain vigilant to the threat of a second wave that could be so damaging to Londoners’ health and London’s economy.
    [Show full text]
  • DVS Phase 1 Consultation Report
    Direct Vision Standards Consultation results November 2017 Contents 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 1 2 Methodology for analysis of consultation responses ......................................... 2 3 Analysis of responses to closed question ......................................................... 3 4 Analysis of responses to open question ......................................................... 19 5 Responses from stakeholders ........................................................................ 50 Appendix A – List of stakeholders consulted……………………………………………65 Appendix B - Stakeholder email..………………………………………………………...72 1 1 Introduction Between 24 January and 18 April 2017, we consulted on proposals to introduce a Direct Vision Standard for HGVs in London. This forms part of the Mayor’s commitment to reduce road danger through the adoption of a ‘Vision Zero’ approach. This document summarises the results to the consultation. About the proposals Much progress has been made through working in partnership with the freight industry to improve HGV safety, including HGV design, but we need to go further. Evidence shows that HGV drivers react more quickly using direct vision where they can see more of their surroundings directly through their windows, as opposed to indirectly through mirrors or monitors. This has the potential to reduce the risk of fatal or serious collisions. The proposals included introducing a new simple Direct Vision Standard which would rate vehicles from zero (poor) to five star (excellent) based on how much a HGV driver can see directly from a vehicle cab, rather than through other equipment such as mirrors. The aim of which is to give regulators, manufacturers, operators and contractors an objective standard by which to rate and improve the safety of HGVs. The proposals also included using this standard to ban or restrict HGVs with the most limited direct vision from London’s roads.
    [Show full text]
  • MPA Members Attendance Record 2007/08
    APPENDIX 1 MPA member attendance record 2007/08 Figures in brackets are the number of committee meetings held during the year; figures not in brackets are the numbers actually attended by that member. Anthony Arbour Full Authority: (9) - 9 Remuneration: (3) - 2 PPR*: (7) – 2 PSC: (6) – 2 Total: (25) - 15 Jennette Arnold Full Authority: (9) - 8 CoP: (6) - 3 Corp. Governance: (3) - 1 Remuneration: (3) - 1 Total: (22) – 13 Reshard Auladin Full Authority (9) - 8 CoP: (6) - 5 Finance*: (9) - 6 Remuneration: (3) - 2 PPR*: (7) - 6 PSC: (6) - 5 Total: (40) - 32 Richard Barnes Full Authority (9) - 8 CoP: (6) - 3 Finance*: (9) - 2 PPR*: (7) - 1 (resigned from ctee Sept. 07) Total: (31) - 14 Faith Boardman Full Authority: (9) - 7 CoP (6) - 6 Corp. Governance (3) - 3 Finance* (9) - 1 PPR* (7) - 1 Total: (34) - 18 Cindy Butts Full Authority: (9) - 9 CoP (6) - 6 EODB (4) - 3 Remuneration (3) - 2 Total: (22) - 19 Dee Doocey Full Authority (9) - 6 Finance*: (9) - 5 Total: (18) - 11 Len Duvall Full Authority (9) - 8 CoP: (6) - 5 Remuneration: (3) - 2 Total: (18) - 15 Nicky Gavron Full Authority (9) - 6 Total: (9) - 6 Toby Harris Full Authority (9) - 7 CoP: (6) - 5 Corp. Governance: (3) - 3 Total: (18) - 15 Kirsten Hearn Full Authority: (9) - 7 CoP: (6) - 4 EODB: (4) - 4 Total: (19) - 15 Peter Herbert Full Authority (9) - 9 EODB: (4) - 1 Total (13) - 10 Damian Hockney Full Authority: (9) - 4 (Resigned as Member CoP: (6) - 1 March 2008) EODB: (4) - 1 PSC: (6) - 2 Standards: (1) – 0 Finance*: (9) - 0 Total: (35) - 8 Elizabeth Howlett Full Authority: (9) - 8 CoP: (6) - 6 Finance*: (9) - 8 PSC: (6) - 3 Total: (33) - 24 Jenny Jones Full Authority (9) - 8 PSC: (6) - 2 Total: (15) - 10 Joanne McCartney Full Authority: (9) - 7 Total: (9) - 7 Karim Murji Full Authority: (9) - 8 CoP: (6) - 5 PPR*: (7) - 7 PSC: (6) - 6 Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mayor Is Elected by the People of London Every
    14523 GLA Mayor lflt AW 10/9/02 3:42 PM Page 1 The Mayor is elected by the people of London The Mayor’s vision every four years. The next election will be in Ken Livingstone, the Mayor of London, wants 2004. The current Mayor is Ken Livingstone, who London to be: was elected in May 2000. • A prosperous city, in which all share in The Mayor represents London and Londoners, in the benefits of wealth created in London’s the UK and internationally. He takes a strategic dynamic economy. look at what is happening in London, drawing • A city for people, with safe, attractive streets, up policies for the social and economic where goods and services are within easy reach development of the city. and where everyone feels safe and secure. The Mayor’s powers and responsibilities are set • An accessible city, with fast, efficient and out in the Greater London Authority Act 1999. comfortable means of transport and access to This Act also covers the London Assembly and affordable homes, education and training, the Greater London Authority (GLA). health, leisure and recreation. • A fair city, showing tolerance and abolishing all forms of discrimination, where neighbourhoods and communities have a say in their future. • A green city, making efficient use of natural resources and energy, respecting the natural world and wildlife, using to the full the varied pattern of open space, eco-friendly design and construction methods, recycling waste and creating new ‘green’ industries. The job of the Mayor The Mayor sets the budget for the Metropolitan The Deputy Mayor Police Service (under the oversight of the The Mayor appoints one of the London Assembly Metropolitan Police Authority), Transport for members to be Deputy Mayor.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes Before Starting These Questions, Has Any Relevance to the Value, Function Or Effectiveness of London Power
    Appendix 2 London Assembly Environment Committee - Wednesday 24 February 2021 Transcript of Agenda Item 5 – London’s Green Recovery from COVID-19 – Greater London Authority (GLA) and London Councils Caroline Russell AM (Chair): [Mayor] Philip [Granville] is joining us on the next panel and I will also welcome Shirley Rodrigues, who is Deputy Mayor for Environment [and Energy] at the GLA; Elliot Treharne, who is Interim Assistant Director for Environment and Energy at the GLA; Peter Daw, who is Interim Assistant Director for Environment and Energy at the GLA; and once again Mayor Philip Glanville, who is Chair of the Transport and Environment Committee for London Councils. I am now going to invite Shirley to give a brief opening statement and then we will move on to Nicky Gavron [AM], who will be asking the first lot of questions. Shirley Rodrigues (Deputy Mayor for Environment and Energy, Greater London Authority): First of all, I want to say thank you for the invitation and thanks to the Committee for your excellent work over this last term. At the risk of déjà vu, thanks to Assembly Members Nicky Gavron, Jennette Arnold and Tony Arbour, who are stepping down at this election after a rather unexpected and unwanted extension to their term. In terms of what we are going to be talking about today, as you know, the Mayor’s ambition is for London to be the greenest of all cities and we have set some very tough targets to meet: zero waste, zero carbon, the best air quality of any major world city, and thriving and green and biodiverse spaces.
    [Show full text]