DOCSLIB.ORG

2001 GA Ann Report.A/W

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2001 GA Ann Report.A/W Printed by Seacourt Press Limited on recycled paper made from 75% de-inked post consumer waste and a maximum of 25% mill broke. Seacourt have EMAS and ISO14001 accreditation, are members of the waterless printing association and their carbon emissions are offset. EMAS registration number UK-5-0000073. annual report 2000/01 our mission Green Alliance exists to promote sustainable development by ensuring that the environment is at the heart of decision-making We work with senior people in government, parliament, business and the environment movement to encourage new ideas, dialogue and constructive solutions. Green Alliance has three main aims: > to make the environment a central political issue > to integrate the environment effectively in public policy and decision-making > to stimulate new thinking and advance the environmental agenda into new areas The publication of this report has been supported by Severn Trent plc and the DEFRA Environmental Action Fund chair’s report Green Alliance’s increased strategic focus over the past two years is paying dividends. Our efforts to engage the Prime Minister and his officials on the environment succeeded, with Tony Blair’s speech to a Green Alliance/CBI audience in October 2000. This was by no means the end of a process, but opened a new dialogue between the Prime Minister and environment groups. Another success was the publication of our detailed, consensual work on the role of negotiated agreements between government and business. This charts a course through opposing views, laying down a model of best practice of which government, business and NGOs can feel ownership. Two Green Alliance pamphlets received considerable attention. Charles Leadbeater, author of Living on Thin Air, examined the environmental implications of the hi-tech, knowledge- intensive economy in Mind Over Matter, and In Our Backyard by Ken Worpole offered solutions to the environmental hardships faced by our poorest communities. We worked hard to raise the profile of the environment as an issue for voters. Leading the Vote Environment 2001 initiative, we worked with other environmental NGOs and the political parties, setting out environmental priorities for the new government.We were disappointed that the environment still did not receive the political attention it deserves at election time, but the initiative provided good grounding for further work in this area. Next year Green Alliance will be working to ensure a stronger environmental dimension to the forthcoming Treasury spending round, and we will take forward the debate about handling environmental risk using the precautionary principle. A new pamphlet will look at environmental values and consumer decisions, aiming to move beyond the ‘ethical consumption’ niche. After a brief spell as director, we were sorry to lose Paul Jefferiss, who decided for personal reasons to leave Green Alliance in April 2001. However, we are delighted that Rebecca Willis has taken on the role so seamlessly.We are already benefiting from her personal drive and enthusiasm to move Green Alliance in ever more interesting directions. Finally, thanks to the staff and my fellow trustees at Green Alliance, as well as our wide network of members and colleagues, all of whom help us to achieve so much. Tony Hams Green Alliance annual report 2000/2001 > 1 Tony Blair’s first speech on the environment, as Prime Minister, was to a Green Alliance/CBI conference in October 2000.The event followed a long process of dialogue and engagement with senior government officials and advisers.The most important outcome was that the speech opened a genuine conversation between the Prime Minister and the environment movement. Prime Minister’s first environment speech The Government now seems to be developing a proactive environmental agenda and is openly addressing themes such as a greener economy and resource productivity, both currently promoted by Green Alliance. It remains to be seen, however, whether these new commitments represent the step-change needed to bring about real environmental improvement. Sarah Burton Director of Political and Business Affairs, Greenpeace “...what was important about the speech was that the Prime Minister specifically recognised the need to take urgent action on climate change, and that the cuts in greenhouse gases needed would be in line with Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution recommendations of 60 per cent by 2050. This is much more than current targets. He said that this would require huge investment in renewable forms of energy, and made a small step towards that by announcing more money. He also talked about the partnerships needed between government, business and NGOs and cited the Greenfreeze campaign by Greenpeace as a positive example.” Patricia Hayes Secretary to the Sustainable Development Commission “This was an important occasion for me because it was when the Prime Minister launched the Sustainable Development Commission! As a cross-sectoral organisation, we strongly welcomed the emphatic support he gave for partnership to deliver sustainability. While he clearly recognised the enormity of the issues facing us - like climate change, biodiversity, resource productivity - he also recognised the scope for competitiveness, innovation and sustainability to pull in the same direction and deliver positive solutions. SDC’s mission is to inspire sustainable development. It was great to have such high level endorsement of what we are trying to achieve right from our very first day.” Simon Lyster Chief Executive, Wildlife Trusts “Since the speech we have seen several signs that the environment is moving up the political agenda. This is encouraging, but the jury is still out as to whether his fine words result in sufficient action to reverse, for example, the decline in biodiversity on the ground. And it is against delivery that he should be judged” Bill Alexander Chief Executive, Thames Water “The environment is the heart of Thames Water’s business and it was very encouraging to hear the Prime Minister underline his commitment to environmental improvement and to have the opportunity to discuss the Government’s priorities. Progress will only be achieved through partnership between business, NGOs and the public sector and the speech was an important step in this engagement process. Tony Blair acknowledged that we face challenges on three levels: global, national and individual. I recognise the vital role of business in meeting these challenges, but also welcome the Prime Minister’s inclusive approach.” 2 < Green Alliance annual report 2000/01 During the year, Green Alliance worked with both main opposition parties to help them provide a strong voice on the environment. With the Conservatives, we held discussions on their ‘blue-green agenda’, and Charles Kennedy offered his thoughts on how the Liberal Democrats could contribute in his speech to Green Alliance in March 2001. an active opposition Charles Kennedy Leader of the Liberal Democrats, to Green Alliance, March 2001 “Increasingly, green issues are an important factor in deciding how people cast their vote... Protecting the environment and local people - that is what our ‘Green Justice’ agenda is all about... On a planet where the most precious of commodities, a stable climate, is under threat emissions could be rationed ...every citizen could in the long run have an equal emission quota. There could hardly be a more obvious application of the notion of universal human rights.” Damian Green MP Conservative spokesman on the environment (until June 2001) “During my time as environment spokesman I found Green Alliance particularly useful in allowing intelligent public and private conversation between the Conservative party and environmental groups. Its set-piece events helped, but I also appreciated the opportunities for discussion of our policy leading up to the election.” Green Alliance annual report 2000/01 > 3 In the run-up to the general election, the Vote Environment 2001 initiative asked all the political parties to put the environment as an issue into their election campaign, and to adopt three pledges on climate change, the countryside and chemicals. The initiative was steered by Green Alliance and involved a powerful coalition of environmental organisations: Greenpeace, RSPB,The Wildlife Trusts, WWF-UK, Friends of the Earth and CPRE. In February, Vote Environment 2001 challenged the environmental spokespeople of the three main parties to a hustings debate which then received exclusive coverage in The Independent. A website set up for the campaign also allowed people to contact political parties and MPs directly and ask them to adopt the pledges.This was a successful exercise in collaboration between the groups, harnessing a combined public membership of around two million people to promote the environment to politicians. Despite Vote Environment 2001, the environment hardly featured at all once the election campaign actually got underway.This sidelining of environmental themes continues to be a difficult issue for Green Alliance and other environment groups. Tony Burton Director of Policy and Planning, National Trust “...the environment is still out of the political mainstream. At the moment, it can touch a nerve - GM, greenfield housing, road building - but it does not seem able to shape a political philosophy.” The Independent reporting on Vote Environment 2001 “Only the Liberal Democrats, to give them credit where it is due, have a climate change strategy that goes beyond the first decade of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Wilson Doctrine Pat Strickland
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 4258, 19 June 2015 By Cheryl Pilbeam The Wilson Doctrine Pat Strickland Inside: 1. Introduction 2. Historical background 3. The Wilson doctrine 4. Prison surveillance 5. Damian Green 6. The NSA files and metadata 7. Labour MPs: police monitoring www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary Number 4258, 19 June 2015 2 Contents Summary 3 1. Introduction 4 2. Historical background 4 3. The Wilson doctrine 5 3.1 Criticism of the Wilson doctrine 6 4. Prison surveillance 9 4.1 Alleged events at Woodhill prison 9 4.2 Recording of prisoner’s telephone calls – 2006-2012 10 5. Damian Green 12 6. The NSA files and metadata 13 6.1 Prism 13 6.2 Tempora and metadata 14 Legal challenges 14 7. Labour MPs: police monitoring 15 Cover page image copyright: Chamber-070 by UK Parliament image. Licensed under CC BY 2.0 / image cropped 3 The Wilson Doctrine Summary The convention that MPs’ communications should not be intercepted by police or security services is known as the ‘Wilson Doctrine’. It is named after the former Prime Minister Harold Wilson who established the rule in 1966. According to the Times on 18 November 1966, some MPs were concerned that the security services were tapping their telephones. In November 1966, in response to a number of parliamentary questions, Harold Wilson made a statement in the House of Commons saying that MPs phones would not be tapped. More recently, successive Interception of Communications Commissioners have recommended that the forty year convention which has banned the interception of MPs’ communications should be lifted, on the grounds that legislation governing interception has been introduced since 1966.
    [Show full text]
  • City Villages: More Homes, Better Communities, IPPR
    CITY VILLAGES MORE HOMES, BETTER COMMUNITIES March 2015 © IPPR 2015 Edited by Andrew Adonis and Bill Davies Institute for Public Policy Research ABOUT IPPR IPPR, the Institute for Public Policy Research, is the UK’s leading progressive thinktank. We are an independent charitable organisation with more than 40 staff members, paid interns and visiting fellows. Our main office is in London, with IPPR North, IPPR’s dedicated thinktank for the North of England, operating out of offices in Newcastle and Manchester. The purpose of our work is to conduct and publish the results of research into and promote public education in the economic, social and political sciences, and in science and technology, including the effect of moral, social, political and scientific factors on public policy and on the living standards of all sections of the community. IPPR 4th Floor 14 Buckingham Street London WC2N 6DF T: +44 (0)20 7470 6100 E: [email protected] www.ippr.org Registered charity no. 800065 This book was first published in March 2015. © 2015 The contents and opinions expressed in this collection are those of the authors only. CITY VILLAGES More homes, better communities Edited by Andrew Adonis and Bill Davies March 2015 ABOUT THE EDITORS Andrew Adonis is chair of trustees of IPPR and a former Labour cabinet minister. Bill Davies is a research fellow at IPPR North. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The editors would like to thank Peabody for generously supporting the project, with particular thanks to Stephen Howlett, who is also a contributor. The editors would also like to thank the Oak Foundation for their generous and long-standing support for IPPR’s programme of housing work.
    [Show full text]
  • London Plan 2004
    Other formats and languages For a large print, Braille, disc, sign language video or audio-tape version of this document or its summary, please contact us at the address below: Public Liaison Unit Greater London Authority Telephone 020 7983 4100 City Hall www.london.gov.uk The Queen’s Walk London SE1 2AA You will need to supply your name, your postal address and state the format and title of the publication you require. The London Plan Spatial Development Strategy for Greater London If you would like a copy of the summary of this document in your language, please phone the number or contact us at the Plan The London address above. Chinese Hindi Spatial Development Strategy for Greater London Greater for Spatial Development Strategy Vietnamese Bengali Greek Urdu Turkish Arabic Punjabi Gujarati February 2004 City Hall www.london.gov.uk The Queen’s Walk Enquiries 020 7983 4100 London SE1 2AA Minicom 020 7983 4458 MoL/Feb 04/CJ D&P/MT/448A The London Plan Spatial Development Strategy for Greater London February 2004 copyright Greater London Authority February 2004 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 ISBN 1 85261 544 3 Cover photograph Adam Hinton This document is printed on 50 per cent post consumer recycled paper, 50 per cent totally chlorine free pulp, and printed with vegetable oil based inks. Acknowlegements The Mayor would like to thank everyone who contributed to this plan including the Independent Panel, all participants at the Examination in Public and everyone else who responded to the public consultation.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter Hitchens on Whether the European Argues That Great Britain the Union Has Changed Britain Is a Nation in Decline Progressive Conscience
    DAMIAN GREEN MP PETER HITCHENS on whether the European argues that Great Britain The Union has changed Britain is a nation in decline Progressive Conscience From Global Empire to the Global Race: modern Britishness john redwood mp | professor tim bale | daniel hannan mep | stephen crabb mp Contents 03 Editor’s introduction 18 Daniel Hannan: To define Contributors James Brenton Britain, look to its institutions PROF TIM BALE holds the Chair James Brenton politics in Politics at Queen Mary 20 Is Britain still Great? University of London 04 Director’s note JAMES BRENTON is the editor of Peter Hitchens and Ryan Shorthouse Ryan Shorthouse The Progressive Conscience 23 Painting a picture of Britain NICK CATER is Director of 05 Why I’m a Bright Blue MP the Menzies Research Centre Alan Davey George Freeman MP in Australia 24 What’s the problem with STEPHEN CRABB MP is Secretary 06 Replastering the cracks in the North of State for Wales promoting British values? Professor Tim Bale ROSS CYPHER-BURLEY was Michael Hand Spokesman to the British 07 Time for an English parliament Embassy in Tel Aviv 25 Multiple loyalties are easy John Redwood MP ALAN DAVEY is the departing Damian Green MP Arts Council Chief Executive 08 Britain after the referendum WILL EMKES is a writer 26 Influence in the Middle East Rupert Myers GEORGE FREEMAN MP is the Ross Cypher-Burley Minister for Life Sciences 09 Patriotism and Wales DR ROBERT FORD lectures at 27 Winning friends in India Stephen Crabb MP the University of Manchester Emran Mian DAMIAN GREEN MP is the 10 Unionism
    [Show full text]
  • New-Build `Gentrification' and London's Riverside Renaissance
    Environment and Planning A 2005, volume 37, pages 1165 ^ 1190 DOI:10.1068/a3739 New-build `gentrification' and London's riverside renaissance Mark Davidson, Loretta Lees Department of Geography, King's College London, Strand, London WC2R 2LS, England; e-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Received 3 February 2004; in revised form 5 August 2004 Abstract. In a recent conference paper Lambert and Boddy (2002) questioned whether new-build residential developments in UK city centres were examples of gentrification. They concluded that this stretched the term too far and coined `residentialisation' as an alternative term. In contrast, we argue in this paper that new-build residential developments in city centres are examples of gentrification. We argue that new-build gentrification is part and parcel of the maturation and mutation of the gentrification process during the post-recession era. We outline the conceptual cases for and against new-build `gentrification', then, using the case of London's riverside renaissance, we find in favour of the case for. ``In the last decade the designer apartment blocks built by corporate developers for elite consumption have become as characteristic of gentrified landscapes as streetscapes of lovingly restored Victorian terraces. As gentrification continues to progress and exhibit new forms and patterns, it seems unnecessary to confine the concept to residential rehabilitation.'' Shaw (2002, page 44) 1 Introduction Recent gentrification research has begun to highlight the challenges that current waves of gentrification pose towards its conceptualisation (Lees, 2003a; Slater, 2004). In the last decade gentrification has matured and its processes are operating in a new economic, cultural, social, and political environment.
    [Show full text]
  • South East Coast
    NHS South East Coast New MPs ‐ May 2010 Please note: much of the information in the following biographies has been taken from the websites of the MPs and their political parties. NHS BRIGHTON AND HOVE Mike Weatherley ‐ Hove (Cons) Caroline Lucas ‐ Brighton Pavillion (Green) Leader of the Green Party of England and Qualified as a Chartered Management Wales. Previously Green Party Member Accountant and Chartered Marketeer. of the European Parliament for the South From 1994 to 2000 was part owner of a East of England region. company called Cash Based in She was a member of the European Newhaven. From 2000 to 2005 was Parliament’s Environment, Public Health Financial Controller for Pete Waterman. and Food Safety Committee. Most recently Vice President for Finance and Administration (Europe) for the Has worked for a major UK development world’s largest non-theatrical film licensing agency providing research and policy company. analysis on trade, development and environment issues. Has held various Previously a Borough Councillor in positions in the Green Party since joining in 1986 and is an Crawley. acknowledged expert on climate change, international trade and Has run the London Marathon for the Round Table Children’s Wish peace issues. Foundation and most recently last year completed the London to Vice President of the RSPCA, the Stop the War Coalition, Campaign Brighton bike ride for the British Heart Foundation. Has also Against Climate Change, Railfuture and Environmental Protection completed a charity bike ride for the music therapy provider Nordoff UK. Member of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament National Robbins. Council and a Director of the International Forum on Globalization.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Andrew Marr Show, Damian Green 18 Sept 2016
    1 ANDREW MARR SHOW, DAMIAN GREEN 18TH SEPT 2016 ANDREW MARR SHOW 18TH SEPTEMBER 2016 DAMIAN GREEN AM: We’ve been talking perhaps rather loosely this morning about a post-liberal era. And one of the headline writers suggest that, compared with the economic liberalism and so forth of past Conservatives, Theresa May represents a break. Do you recognise that language at all? DG: No. I think – I mean clearly liberal capitalism and western values are under threat, they need fighting for, but they always do. I always think this idea we’ve reached the point of the end of history, that Fukuyama analysis at the end of the 80s was optimistic nonsense. You always have to keep fighting for your values. But Theresa May and her government will fight for those broadly small ‘L’ liberal, free market values as hard as any previous Conservative government. AM: So do you see any change of tonal direction in this new government at all? DG: Well, there’s clearly a large element of continuity because we’re all still Conservatives and we’re all modernising conservatives. I think the Conservative Party went through a big change under David Cameron that was necessary and desirable and that element will continue. Of course any new prime minister has their own individual policy priorities, and indeed their own way of doing business and Theresa will do it in a different way. AM: I was going to invite you to explain further since you knew Theresa May for a long, long time. What do you think is the essence of the Theresa May approach? What is new and fresh about it? 2 ANDREW MARR SHOW, DAMIAN GREEN 18TH SEPT 2016 DG: Well, the essence of it is a desire to serve.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the Government for BIA Members
    A guide to the Government for BIA members Correct as of 29 November 2018 This is a briefing for BIA members on the Government and key ministerial appointments for our sector. It has been updated to reflect the changes in the Cabinet following the resignations in the aftermath of the government’s proposed Brexit deal. The Conservative government does not have a parliamentary majority of MPs but has a confidence and supply deal with the Northern Irish Democratic Unionist Party (DUP). The DUP will support the government in key votes, such as on the Queen's Speech and Budgets. This gives the government a working majority of 13. Contents: Ministerial and policy maker positions in the new Government relevant to the life sciences sector .......................................................................................... 2 Ministerial brief for the Life Sciences.............................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Theresa May’s team in Number 10 ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 7 Ministerial and policy maker positions in the new Government relevant to the life sciences sector* *Please note that this guide only covers ministers and responsibilities pertinent to the life sciences and will be updated as further roles and responsibilities are announced.
    [Show full text]
  • London Assembly (Mayor’S Question Time) – 21 October 2015
    Appendix 1 London Assembly (Mayor’s Question Time) – 21 October 2015 Transcript of Agenda Item 4 – Oral Update on the Report of the Mayor Jennette Arnold OBE AM (Chair): Mayor, do you need five minutes to update us on any matters? Boris Johnson MP (Mayor of London): I do not know how long I need, but I will give you a quick report, Jennette. Just to remind the Assembly, we have had a record number of affordable homes but also in the last few weeks I was able to announce that 52,000 Londoners on modest incomes have moved into part-buy/part-rent homes. These are incredibly important because so many Londoners want to get a share in the value of their home. I went to see a fantastic project up at Waltham Forest at Gallery Court in Fulbourne Road where there are about 124 mixed-tenure apartments. The average starting outlay is about £63,750. We have deposits for as little as £5,000, averaging £13,000 for the deposit for the purchase. Average household wages for these homes are about £37,000. If you can imagine two people with a collective income of £37,000, it is really within Londoners’ reach. That was a wonderful project to see. We have launched a report on the dynamism of London’s creative industries, which are now worth almost £35 billion to the economy. That seems to have more than doubled. The last figure I used to use was £16 billion and so it seems to have gone up massively.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Ministers' Interests
    LIST OF MINISTERS’ INTERESTS CABINET OFFICE DECEMBER 2017 CONTENTS Introduction 3 Prime Minister 5 Attorney General’s Office 6 Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy 7 Cabinet Office 11 Department for Communities and Local Government 10 Department for Culture, Media and Sport 11 Ministry of Defence 13 Department for Education 14 Department of Exiting the European Union 16 Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs 17 Foreign and Commonwealth Office 19 Department of Health 21 Home Office 22 Department for International Development 23 Department for International Trade 24 Ministry of Justice 25 Northern Ireland Office 26 Office of the Advocate General for Scotland 27 Office of the Leader of the House of Commons 28 Office of the Leader of the House of Lords 29 Scotland Office 30 Department for Transport 31 HM Treasury 33 Wales Office 34 Department for Work and Pensions 35 Government Whips – Commons 36 Government Whips – Lords 40 2 INTRODUCTION Ministerial Code Under the terms of the Ministerial Code, Ministers must ensure that no conflict arises, or could reasonably be perceived to arise, between their Ministerial position and their private interests, financial or otherwise. On appointment to each new office, Ministers must provide their Permanent Secretary with a list, in writing, of all relevant interests known to them, which might be thought to give rise to a conflict. Individual declarations, and a note of any action taken in respect of individual interests, are then passed to the Cabinet Office Propriety and Ethics team and the Independent Adviser on Ministers’ Interests to confirm they are content with the action taken or to provide further advice as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Government and Opposition Reshuffle
    18 January 2018 Government and opposition reshuffle At the start of January, Theresa May undertook a ministerial reshuffle, stating that the reshuffle brings “fresh talent into government” and ensures it “looks more like the country it serves.” The changes saw the promotion of sixteen women and an additional three ministers with responsibilities for housing, health and Brexit. Jeremy Hunt remains in post, overseeing the newly renamed Department of Health and Social Care. Stephen Barclay and Caroline Dinenage have replaced Philip Dunne as ministers of state, following his resignation. Labour leader, Jeremy Corbyn, announced 13 appointments to his frontbench, including Paula Sherriff, who becomes shadow minister of state for social care and mental health. This briefing includes: 1. A summary of the changes to government ministers 2. Ministerial responsibilities in the department of health and social care 3. An overview of changes to the shadow ministerial team 4. Changes made last year to the Liberal Democrat frontbench team 1. Changes to government ministers The reshuffle follows a series of cabinet resignations, the most recent being that of the first secretary of state and minister for the cabinet office, Damien Green. Green, the prime minister’s effective deputy, was a key ally of Theresa May and chaired 8 cabinet committees and taskforces. He departed the government after an investigation found he had breached the ministerial code. The secretaries for the “great offices of state” of the Treasury, Home Office and Foreign Office remain in place, and there were only minor changes to the cabinet. David Lidington, formerly the justice secretary, replaced Damian Green as minister for the cabinet office but not as first secretary of state, although it is likely he will deputise for May at PMQs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Brexit Effect How Government Has Changed Since the EU Referendum
    The Brexit Effect How government has changed since the EU referendum Lewis Lloyd About this report Implementing the result of the 2016 EU referendum has proven an unprecedented test for the UK Government – one that it has yet to pass. Brexit has challenged the status quo, upending conventions and inviting us to rethink how government, and politics more broadly, work in the UK. On the day the UK was originally scheduled to leave the EU, this report assesses the impact on six areas that have been particularly subject to the “Brexit Effect”: ministers, the civil service, public bodies, money, devolution, and Parliament. Our Brexit work The Institute for Government has a major programme of work looking at the negotiations, the UK’s future relationship with the EU and how the UK is governed after Brexit. Keep up to date with our comment, explainers and reports, read our media coverage, and find out about our events at: www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/brexit March 2019 Contents List of figures and tables 2 List of abbreviations 4 Summary 5 Introduction 6 1. Ministers 7 2. Civil service 13 3. Public bodies 17 4. Money 21 5. Devolution 25 6. Parliament 31 References 39 List of figures and tables Figure 1 Changes in Brexit ‘War Cabinet’ membership over time 8 Figure 2 Timeline of resignations under Theresa May, outside of reshuffles 9 Figure 3 Ministers and senior civil servants in DExEU, June 2016 to present 9 Figure 4 Percentage change in staff numbers (FTE) for whole civil service, Defra and the Home Office, 2010 –18 13 Figure 5 Percentage
    [Show full text]