The Incineration Campaign Guide the Incineration Campaign Guide

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Incineration Campaign Guide the Incineration Campaign Guide The Incineration Campaign Guide The Incineration Campaign Guide Introduction 1 Section 1 - Campaigning 7 Section 2 - Overview of Incineration Campaigns 11 Section 3 - Incineration Policies 15 Section 4 - The Environmental Problems of Waste Incineration 21 Section 5 - Campaigning on Waste Plans 29 Section 6 - Establishing the Facts About a Proposal 39 Section 7 - Who Gives Planning Permission? 43 Section 8 - Objecting to the PlanningApplication 49 Section 9 - The Local Planning Authority and How to Lobby Them 63 Section 10 - Who Gives Incinerators Licences to Operate ? 69 Section 11 - Campaigning Against the Licence Application 73 Section 12 - The Environmental Statement 77 Section 13 - Campaign Case Histories 83 Section 14 - Northern Ireland - Planning and Waste Disposal Licensing 91 Annexes 1. The Arguments 95 2. Air Pollution and Health 99 3. Municipal Waste Incinerator Emission Limits (to Air) 104 4. Energy Use and Greenhouse Gases 107 5. Some Planning Decisions 117 6. How Incinerators Work 125 7. Reading List 129 8. Abbreviations and Units 135 Appendices 1. Don’t Burn it or Bury it - alternatives to landfill and incineration 2. Up in Smoke...why Friends of the Earth opposes incineration. Friends of the Earth’s Incineration Campaign Guide, December 1997 Introduction This introduction explains C why Friends of the Earth has produced this guide C how the guide can best be used C why there are separate references to Northern Ireland. Here we present a summary of our arguments, some ideas for finding your way around this book, and an overview of each separate section. Why an incinerator campaign guide? C Incinerators rely on landfill sites to dispose of Incinerators present serious environmental threats. polluting ash, which is still a considerable volume - around one half of the volume as compared with Friends of the Earth opposes incineration for the 3 following reasons: compacted landfilled rubbish . Landfill sites have their own problems. C Incineration wastes valuable resources. Research by Friends of the Earth suggests that we need to reduce How to use this campaign guide resource consumption by 80-90 per cent1 . We cannot continue to burn valuable resources in Friends of the Earth believes that communities and incinerators. Incinerators, through their very individuals should be involved in the debate about existence, encourage our “throw-away society”. waste prevention, waste disposal and particular proposals for incinerators. This guide should enable you C Recycling resources, as compared with burning to develop confidence with incineration issues and help waste and exploiting virgin resources, saves energy you anticipate and prepare for the opportunities which consumption and production of greenhouse gases are presented as the campaign develops. (global warming gases) such as carbon dioxide. If possible, do not wait until there is a proposal for an C Incinerators need considerable certainty of waste incinerator on your door-step. Decisions about supplies for 20 years or so. They almost literally particular incinerators often relate back to earlier demand creation of waste as feedstock, thus closing decisions on planning policies or waste strategies, so we off alternative strategies for dealing with the waste. have included sections to help you campaign at these earlier stages in the process (see Sections 2, 5 and 13). C Incinerators cost a huge amount of money to build, This guide should help you whether your local authority and incineration, according to a report for the is just considering incineration or other waste European Commission, is set to become the most management strategies for the future or if you are expensive method for dealing with waste2 . opposing a specific proposal for an incinerator. C Incinerators produce toxic emissions and heavily The focus of this guide is on municipal waste contaminated ash. incineration (i.e. the general household and commercial wastes collected by the local authority for disposal) and 1 McLaren, D., Bullock, S.,Yousuf, N. (1997). Tomorrow’s World - Britain’s Share in a 3 Department of the Environment/Welsh Sustainable Future. London, Earthscan. Office (1995). Making Waste Work. A strategy for 2 European Commission, DGX1 (1996). sustainable waste management in England and Cost-benefit analysis of the different municipal solid Wales. The Stationery Office, London. Figures that waste management systems: objectives and talk of the ash volume as one tenth that of the instruments for the year 2000. A report by Coopers original waste are comparing the uncompacted & Lybrand/CSERGE. Luxembourg, Office for volume of the original waste, rather than its final Official Publications of the European Communities. compacted state in the landfill. 1 Friends of the Earth’s Incineration Campaign Guide, December 1997 Box 1: Where should I begin...? If you are new to campaigning and have not had much experience with waste management issues, have a look at Section 2 on incineration campaigns (which summarises the stages of waste management planning and incinerator proposals), and the case studies in Section 13. The case studies should give you some insight into the possible scenarios and give you a good idea of how campaigning might proceed. These examples have been written by local campaigners active in Friends of the Earth’s local group network and we hope that their stories illustrate that campaigning is absorbing and fulfilling. There is no book that can substitute for direct experience, but we have tried to bring you a flavour of campaigning alongside the wealth of information here. Annex 5 summarises some planning decisions and will be useful if you have not been involved in planning issues before. It’s easier than you think... Don’t be put off by the detail in this guide! It’s even OK to say that you don’t understand everything “but Friends of the Earth says...”. Common sense and asking questions go a long way. There are sensible alternatives to incineration and most campaigning is about persuading politicians and other decision-makers that they will be very unpopular if they insist on incineration. Although we have put in lots of technical detail, we have done this to help you understand the process and be able to cope with technicalities when they arise. You may not have to absorb all the details - think about recruiting other people to help on specific bits or try to get your elected representatives to do the legwork. Remember that if politicians feel enough pressure, they will start looking for ways out themselves and will be able to garner the technical resources of the council officers too. the prospects for recycling, but much of this guide (e.g. replaced with new legislation which will bring it planning law, operating permits) will apply to other broadly in line with the rest of the UK. However, more specialised facilities such as incinerators for although Northern Ireland should achieve legislative clinical waste, sewage sludge and chemical waste parity with the rest of the UK in 1997, a number of incinerators. Arguments against cement kilns burning factors will help to create confusion over the next 1-2 hazardous waste as fuel4 and incinerators or power years. plants used for disposal of BSE-infected animals are not addressed specifically either, since there are The introduction of the new legislation must be specific concerns and studies and politics which are followed up by regulations issued by the Department of beyond the scope of this text. the Environment, which may result in further delays before the legislation is actually in force “on the ground”. Northern Ireland Additionally the Department of the Environment has This guide is written predominantly from the just awarded a contract to consultants to write a perspective of England and Wales. Both the Strategy for Sustainable Waste Management for administrative structures responsible for waste Northern Ireland. Until this strategy is published management and legislation differ drastically in (probably not before early 1998) there is likely to be a Northern Ireland. We have included a separate chapter great deal of confusion on the part of local authorities to help, and some further guides are mentioned in the over what government policies apply in Northern Reading List (Annex 7). Remember that there will be Ireland. many similarities whether you are campaigning in England or Northern Ireland, but that you might need to FOE’s Northern Ireland Campaigner has written a check on the particulars of legislation and process. briefing sheet on Waste Management in Northern Ireland for local groups as a supplement to this guide. As stated in the text, the existing legislation governing Telephone 01232 664131 (Northern Ireland FOE) for waste management in Northern Ireland is about to be details. Scotland 4 FOE is working on the issue of cement kilns burning toxic waste. A briefing is available: Although much of this guide has general relevance for FOE (1997). Gone to blazes...burning hazardous anyone concerned about incineration, this guide does waste in cement kilns. not specifically cover Scotland, which has separate 2 Friends of the Earth’s Incineration Campaign Guide, December 1997 legal and administrative organisations. Friends of the Section 2 - Overview of incineration campaigns Earth Scotland can be contacted in Edinburgh, telephone 0131 554 9977. This section - C gives a broad overview of the path to incineration Feedback Please C explains briefly the plans, policies and authorisations affecting waste incineration Do give us your thoughts on what was the most useful C touches on the scope of the arguments that will part of the guide. What was the least useful? What was be useful covered in too much detail or what was covered in too C notes that the pro-incineration lobby will also be little? What were the most grievous omissions? Has it active. helped you win a campaign? All constructive criticism will be gratefully received and your experiences might Section 3 - Incineration Policies be useful to share with other campaigners in a later edition of the guide.
Recommended publications
  • Please Note Venue Scrutiny Co-Ordinating Committee Agenda
    PLEASE NOTE VENUE SCRUTINY CO-ORDINATING COMMITTEE AGENDA Friday 4 January 2008 at 2.00 p.m. at Owton Manor Community Centre, Wynyard Road, Hartlepool MEMBERS: SCRUTINY CO-ORDINATING COMMITTEE: Councillors Akers-Belcher, Brash, R W Cook, S Cook, Fleet, Flintoff, James, Laffey, A E Lilley, G Lilley, A Marshall, Plant, Preece, Shaw, Simmons and Wright. Resident Representatives: Jean Kennedy, Iris Ryder and Linda Shields 1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE 2. TO RECEIVE ANY DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST BY MEMBERS 3. MINUTES 3.1 To confirm the minutes of the meetings held on 2nd, 9th and 21st November 2007 (attached) 4. RESPO NS ES FROM THE CO UNCIL, THE EX ECUT IV E OR COMMI TT EES OF THE COUNCIL TO REPORTS OF THE SCRUTINY COORDINATING COMMITTEE No Items 5. CONSIDERATION OF REQUES T FOR SCRUTINY REVIEWS FROM COUNCIL, EX ECUTIV E MEMBERS AND NON EX ECUTIV E MEM BERS No Items 08.01.04 - SCR UTCOORD AGENDA Hartlepool Bor ough Council 1 PLEASE NOTE VENUE 6. FORWARD PLAN 6.1 Forward Plan: January 2008 – March 2008 - Scrutiny Manager 7. CONSIDERATION OF PROGRESS REPORTS / BUDGET AND POLICY FRAM EWORK DOCUM ENTS 7.1 2008/09 Budget and Policy Framework Proposals – Scrutiny Manager 8. CONSIDERATION OF FINANCIAL MONITORING/CORPORATE REPORTS 8.1 Quarter 2 – Corporate Plan and Revenue Financial Management Report 2007/2008 – Chief Financial Officer 8.2 Quarter 2 – NRF, Capital and Accountable Body Programme Monitoring Report 2007/2008 – Chief Financial Officer 9. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION 9.1 Adult and Community Services and Health Scrutiny Forum – Restructure Proposals – Chair of the Scrutiny Co-ordinating Committee 9.2 Funding of Contract Monitoring System – Explanation of the Adult and Public Health Portfolio Holder – Chair of the Adult and Community Services and Health Scrutiny Forum 9.3 Request for Items for Joint Cabinet / Scrutiny Event of 22 January 2008 – Scrutiny Manager 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Waste Arisings and Waste Management Capacity Model
    Addendum to 2012 study: Waste Arisings and Waste Management Capacity Model Durham County Council June 2018 Addendum to 2012 study: Waste Arisings and Waste Management Capacity Model Disclaimer Anthesis Consulting Group PLC has prepared this report for the sole use of Durham County Council and for the intended purposes as stated in the agreement between Anthesis and Durham County Council under which this report was completed. Anthesis has exercised due and customary care in preparing this report but has not, save as specifically stated, independently verified information provided by others. No other warranty, express or implied, is made in relation to the contents of this report. The use of this report, or reliance on its content, by unauthorised third parties without written permission from Anthesis shall be at their own risk, and Anthesis accepts no duty of care to such third parties. Any recommendations, opinions or findings stated in this report are based on facts and circumstances as they existed at the time the report was prepared. Any changes in such facts and circumstances may adversely affect the recommendations, opinions or findings contained in this report. Anthesis Consulting Group, 2018 1 Addendum to 2012 study: Waste Arisings and Waste Management Capacity Model Addendum to 2012 study: Waste Arisings and Waste Management Capacity Model Durham County Council Prepared for: Prepared by: Spatial Policy Team Anthesis Consulting Group Regeneration & Local Services Development The Future Centre, Durham County Council 9 Newtec Place,
    [Show full text]
  • County Durham Plan (Adopted 2020)
    County Durham Plan ADOPTED 2020 Contents Foreword 5 1 Introduction 7 Neighbourhood Plans 7 Assessing Impacts 8 Duty to Cooperate: Cross-Boundary Issues 9 County Durham Plan Key Diagram and Monitoring 10 2 What the County Durham Plan is Seeking to Achieve 11 3 Vision and Objectives 14 Delivering Sustainable Development 18 4 How Much Development and Where 20 Quantity of Development (How Much) 20 Spatial Distribution of Development (Where) 29 5 Core Principles 71 Building a Strong Competitive Economy 71 Ensuring the Vitality of Town Centres 78 Supporting a Prosperous Rural Economy 85 Delivering a Wide Choice of High Quality Homes 98 Protecting Green Belt Land 124 Sustainable Transport 127 Supporting High Quality Infrastructure 138 Requiring Good Design 150 Promoting Healthy Communities 158 Meeting the Challenge of Climate Change, Flooding and Coastal Change 167 Conserving and Enhancing the Natural and Historic Environment 185 Minerals and Waste 212 Appendices A Strategic Policies 259 B Table of Superseded Policies 261 C Coal Mining Risk Assessments, Minerals Assessments and Minerals and/or Waste 262 Infrastructure Assessment D Safeguarding Mineral Resources and Safeguarded Minerals and Waste Sites 270 E Glossary of Terms 279 CDP Adopted Version 2020 Contents List of County Durham Plan Policies Policy 1 Quantity of New Development 20 Policy 2 Employment Land 30 Policy 3 Aykley Heads 38 Policy 4 Housing Allocations 47 Policy 5 Durham City's Sustainable Urban Extensions 61 Policy 6 Development on Unallocated Sites 68 Policy 7 Visitor Attractions
    [Show full text]
  • How to Avoid Another Plaster on a Wooden Leg
    HOW TO AVOID ANOTHER PLASTER ON A WOODEN LEG PUBLIC INQUIRY TESTMONY Exhibition Hall Kingsley Village Penhale Fraddon MARCH-APRIL-MAY 2010 Town and Country Planning Act 1990 Appeal by SITA CORNWALL LTD against the decision of the former Cornwall County Council (now Cornwall Council) to refuse Planning Permission for the erection of an Energy-from-Waste plant and ancillary development, including a bottom ash facility, bulking up facility, chimney stack, administrative and visitor facilities, gatehouse and weighbridge, vehicle efuelling area, cooling units, parking and circulation areas, security fencing, drainage and landscape woks, pipework for heat transfer to existing china clay dryers, and other ancillary works, togetther with site access road, private haul road and bridged river crossing, junctions with the existing public highway and diversion of footpath at Rostowrack Farm and land at Wheal Remfry, and Goosevean and Parkadillick dryers, Saint Dennis, Saint Austell Cornwall (Cf. Procedural Note : 14 JANUARY 2010 APPEAL REF : APP/D0840/A/09/2113075) RESEARCHER : PAUL MATTHEWS courriel : [email protected] CERC - PREAMBLE TO A HEAVY METAL AND DIOXIN READERS DIGEST “It is a popular misconception that the weight and volume of the raw waste are reduced during incineration. It is often quoted that the volume of waste is reduced by about 90% during incineration. Even if only the residual ashes are considered, however, the actual figure is closer to 45%. The weight of waste is supposedly reduced to about one third during incineration. However this once again refers only to ashes and ignores other incineration emissions in the form of gases, which result in an increased output in weight.
    [Show full text]
  • The North East of England Plan Regional Spatial Strategy to 2021
    The North East of England Plan - Regional Spatial Strategy to 2021 to Strategy The Spatial North - Regional Plan East England of The North East of England Plan Regional Spatial Strategy to 2021 July 2008 ISBN 978-0-11-753997-6 (& 9 780117 539976 lll#ihd#Xd#j` 5374_GONECover(4)_V1_1.indd 1 23/6/08 13:44:38 The North East of England Plan Regional Spatial Strategy to 2021 London: TSO July 2008 Published by TSO (The Stationery Office) and available from: Online www.tsoshop.co.uk Mail, Telephone, Fax & E-mail TSO PO Box 29, Norwich, NR3 1GN Telephone orders/General enquiries: 0870 600 5522 Fax orders: 0870 600 5533 E-mail: [email protected] Textphone 0870 240 3701 TSO Shops 16 Arthur Street, Belfast BT1 4GD 028 9023 8451 Fax 028 9023 5401 71 Lothian Road, Edinburgh EH3 9AZ 0870 606 5566 Fax 0870 606 5588 TSO@Blackwell and other Accredited Agents Communities and Local Government, Eland House, Bressenden Place, London SW1E 5DU Telephone 020 7944 4400 Web site www.communities.gov.uk © Crown copyright 2008 Copyright in the typographical arrangements rests with the Crown. This publication, excluding logos, may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium for research, private study or for internal circulation within an organisation. This is subject to it being reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the publication specified. For any other use of this material, please write to Licensing Division, Office of Public Sector Information, St Clements
    [Show full text]
  • Gloucestershire County Council Page 1 of 150
    Gloucestershire County Council Page 1 of 150 Gloucestershire County Council Page 2 of 150 Abbreviations and Glossary AD Anaerobic Digestion. A process where biodegradable material is encouraged to break down in the absence of oxygen. Material is placed in to an enclosed vessel and in controlled conditions the waste breaks down typically into a digestate, liquor and biogas. AONB Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. ATT Advanced Thermal Treatment. Waste treatment technologies that involve the heating of waste in a reduced oxygen environment to produce a combination of char, synthetic gas and oils that can be used as fuel. These technologies include Pyrolysis and Gasification. Autoclave Autoclave is a form of mechanical heat treatment where waste is subjected to steam under pressure. Generally this process is followed by mechanical sorting and separation of the sterilised waste. The autoclave process produces cleaned glass and metal that is unchanged and that can be recovered. Plastics form mixed lumps/pellets that can be recovered easily and organics form consistent fibres/floc material. BaFO Best and Final Offer. Base The Base Payment is payment calculated on a rate per tonne which is Payment applied to the total tonnage of waste accepted by the contractor in a contract year. BMW Biodegradable Municipal Waste. The component of Municipal Solid Waste capable of being degraded by plants and animals. Biodegradable Municipal Waste includes paper and card, food and garden waste, and a proportion of other wastes, such as textiles. Bottom Ash The ash that arises from a combustion process in a furnace. BRE Building Research Establishment. BREEAM Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method.
    [Show full text]
  • TEES VALLEY LTD Energy from Waste Facility 2009 ANNUAL
    TEES VALLEY LTD Energy from Waste Facility 2009 ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT DOCUMENT Tees Valley – Energy from Waste Facility TITLE : 2009 Annual Performance Report ISSUE DATE : January 2010 V2 PREPARED BY: NAME SIGNATURE Compliance Officer Paula Sinton Environment Rita Greenwood Support Manager – EfWs APPROVED BY: NAME SIGNATURE Plant Manager Mark Atkinson REPORT NAME No. of DISTRIBUTION : Copies SITA – Environment Department – Narborough 1 SITA – Environment Support Manager 1 SITA – Plant Manager 1 Environment Agency Officer 1 SITA Tees Valley P a g e | 2 Annual Performance Report 2009 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Plant description 3. Summary of plant operation 4. Summary of plant monitoring 5. Summary of plant compliance 6. Summary of plant improvements 7. Further information Appendix 1 – CEMS data graphs Appendix 2 – Notifications Table SITA Tees Valley P a g e | 3 Annual Performance Report 2009 1. INTRODUCTION SITA Tees Valley Limited Name of Company SITA Tees Valley – Energy from Waste Facility Name of Plant VP3034SG Permit Number FP3832UU Permit variation Number Haverton Hill Road Address Billingham TS23 1PY 01484 448730 Phone Rita Greenwood – Environment Support Manager EfWs Contact Name/Position Municipal household waste from local councils: Further information, Stockton-on-Tees description of waste types Hartlepool burned and origin Middlesborough Redcar & Cleveland North Tyneside Northumberland PLANT DESCRIPTION This municipal waste incinerator operates 24/7 and can receive up to 2,800 tonnes of municipal waste from local councils per week. The plant has three furnace lines with a combined processing capacity of 375,000 tonnes per annum. The heat produced by waste incineration is used to raise superheated steam which is harnessed to turn a single-cylinder turbine linked to an electricity generator producing 29 MWh of electricity.
    [Show full text]
  • Generating Growth: NECC's First Energy Policy Report
    Generating Growth: NECC’s First Energy Policy Report Produced in partnership with Generating Growth NECC’s First Energy Policy Report seeks to provide a private sector assessment of the challenges and opportunities facing the energy sector in the North East of England and is focused on helping to unlock growth potential in this important sector of the North East economy. It has been produced by the North East Chamber of Commerce with the guidance of the NECC Energy Policy Working Group, which includes representatives from a variety of energy related businesses and organisations with an important part to play in the various debates that surround the energy challenge. NECC The North East Chamber of Commerce (NECC) is the North East’s leading business membership organisation and the only regional chamber of commerce in the country, representing 4,200 businesses on a regional, national, and international level. Its members are drawn from all sizes of business across all sectors and employ about 30% of the region’s workforce. NECC lobbies on behalf of members on a variety of issues in order to improve the conditions for business in the North East. Eversheds Eversheds has 47 offices and over 3,500 legal and business advisers across Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia. Its vision is to be a great place to work and the most client-centred international law firm. As one of the world’s largest law firms Eversheds provides expertise, resources and local service delivery. Eversheds’ Newcastle office provides a full service covering five main practice areas; company commercial; human resources; legal systems; litigation and dispute management; and real estate.
    [Show full text]
  • Better Together Building a Successful Joint Venture Company Contents
    ALTERNATIVE SERVICE DELIVERY MODELS IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT Better together Building a successful joint venture company Contents Executive summary 1 Deciding to set up a JV 6 Setting up the JV 16 Making the JV successful 23 About us 29 Executive summary Local government is continuing to innovate and change as it looks for ways to protect front line services. The changes are picking up pace as more local government bodies innovate by introducing alternative delivery models to generate additional income and save costs. While these new models are not a There are well-publicised cautionary solution by themselves they do add to tales of public-private JVs that have Overall, JVs remain a viable ADM for local authorities. We have set the wider solutions being explored by attracted attention and debate; some out below our insight, based on our local government such as devolution, have ended earlier than planned research, that councils may wish to or have not delivered the intended collaboration and integration. take into account when setting up benefits. While this can detract from In September 2014 we published their own JVs. our first report on alternative delivery their potential as a viable model, many models (ADMs), ‘Responding to the councils are continuing to use this Our research indicates that the number of JVs will continue to rise, in challenge’, which examined a variety type of JV because they recognise that particular public-public partnerships of models that local councils were experienced commercial partners bring cost effective solutions. We agree with as proven models are replicated. JVs looking at to tackle the financial offer great opportunities for savings this, but only if the JV moves away challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • Tees Eco Energy Ltd the Installation Is Located At: Billingham Reach Efw
    Determination of an Application for an Environmental Permit under the Environmental Permitting (England & Wales) Regulations 2016 Decision document recording our decision-making process The Permit Number is: EPR/NP3537YY/A001 The Applicant/Operator is: Tees Eco Energy Ltd The Installation is located at: Billingham Reach EfW What this document is about This is a decision document, which accompanies a permit. It explains how we have considered the Applicant’s Application, and why we have included the specific conditions in the permit we are issuing to the Applicant. It is our record of our decision-making process, to show how we have taken into account all relevant factors in reaching our position. Unless the document explains otherwise, we have accepted the Applicant’s proposals. We try to explain our decision as accurately, comprehensively and plainly as possible. Achieving all three objectives is not always easy, and we would welcome any feedback as to how we might improve our decision documents in future. A lot of technical terms and acronyms are inevitable in a document of this nature: we provide a glossary of acronyms near the front of the document, for ease of reference. Preliminary information and use of terms We gave the application the reference number EPR/NP3537YY/A001. We refer to the application as “the Application” in this document in order to be consistent. The number we have given to the permit is EPR/NP3537YY. We refer to the permit as “the Permit” in this document. The Application was duly made on 10th August 2017. The Applicant is Tees Eco Energy Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • North Eastern Railway Civil Engineering Drawings List
    North Eastern Railway Civil Engineering Drawings List Description: The collection includes a minority of architectural plans, along with drawings of structures such as bridges and viaducts, maps of permanent way routes and alterations, signalling plans and diagrams, with a variety of miscellaneous components for structures and infrastructure. The collection comprises approximately 3500 plans, diagrams and maps on paper, wax linen and linen- backed cartridge paper. System of arrangement: The original arrangement of the drawings has been lost and they derive from a wide variety of applications within the architectural and civil engineering genres. The drawings have therefore been listed in the rolls in which they were found, and every effort made to record the variety of numbering systems used at different times by the railway company departments involved in creating and storing the drawings, representative of the different types of drawing. There is no one single and consistent numbering arrangement. Physical Characteristics: The drawings survive in a variety of formats and sizes – there are wax linen tracings, colour washed linenbacked original office drawings, drawings on cartridge paper, blueprints and other copying processes. Administrative/Biographical History: The North Eastern Railway Company was formed in 1854 as an amalgamation of the York & North Midland Railway, the Leeds Northern Railway and the York, Newcastle & Berwick Railway. It continued to absorb other companies in the north eastern region of England over subsequent decades, including the Stockton & Darlington Railway, South Durham and Lancashire Union Railway and the West Hartlepool Railway. In 1923 the various railway companies of the United Kingdom were grouped into four large amalgamations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bioeconomy in the North of England
    Appendices August 2017 THE BIOECONOMY IN THE NORTH OF ENGLAND ZE2 ZE1 ZE3 LEWIS HARRIS NORTH UIST SKYE Moray e ir h s n SOUTH UIST e de Highland er Ab CANNA RUM BARRA EIGG Angus COLL TIREE Perth and Kinross MULL Argyll and Bute Stirling Fife COLONSAY JURA Lothian Renfrewshore ISLAY Lanarkshire ARRAN Ayrshire Scottish Borders South Ayrshire Northumberland Dumfries and Galloway Donegal Tyne and Wear Northern Ireland Durham Cumbria ISLE OF MAN (CROWN DEPENDENCY) Sligo Monaghan North Yorkshire Leitrim Cavan Mayo Roscommon Louth East Riding of Yorkshire Longford Lancashire Meath West Yorkshire Westmeath North Greater Linc Galway Dublin South e Manchester Offaly sid Yorkshire sey Isle of Mer Kildare e Anglesey r i h Cheshire s Laois Wicklow Derbyshire m Lincolnshire a Clare h Clwyd g W n rex i h t Gwynedd am t Carlow o N Staffordshire Gwynedd Limerick Norfolk Tipperary Kilkenny Wexford ster ice shire Shropshire Le West Waterford Midlands re n hi o s i n to Cambridgeshire Kerry ig p d W m Cork re or a e ce th C Powys s r te Warwickshire o rs N e h ir Suffolk ir h Herefordshire e s d r o f d B e P u e Carmarthenshire B e m c ir br k h ok i s e n rd Essex sh g fo ire h rt a e Gloucestershire m H Gwent Oxfordshire s h i re Greater London Avon West Berkshire Surrey Wiltshire Kent Hampshire Somerset West Sussex East Sussex Devon Dorset Isle of Wight ISLE OF WIGHT l al nw or C A Science and Innovation Audit Report sponsored by the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy Appendix A: Consortium membership Durham University University of
    [Show full text]