DOCSLIB.ORG

South Tees Area SPD Statement of Consultation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
South Tees Area SPD Statement of Consultation Redcar & Cleveland South Tees Area Supplementary Planning Document Statement of Consultation May 2018 this is Redcar & Cleveland Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 2. Background .................................................................................................................... 1 3. Initial Consultation – October 2017 ................................................................................ 1 4. Consultation on the SPD – March 2018 ......................................................................... 2 5. Summary of Consultation – March 2018 ........................................................................ 3 Appendix A -Schedule of Responses - South Tees Area SPD Consultation Appendix B - Schedule of Comments made to Joint Consultation on the Master Plan and SPD 1. Introduction 1.1. This Statement of Consultation has been prepared in accordance with the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and Regulation 12 of the Town & County Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012, which requires that the Local Planning Authority prepare a statement setting out the persons consulted when preparing a Supplementary Planning Document (SPD), a summary of the main issues raised by those persons and how those issues have been addressed in the SPD. 1.2. This statement, therefore, sets out details of the consultation that has taken place and how this has informed the South Tees Area SPD. 2. Background 2.1. The South Tees Area SPD has been prepared by Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council, as the Local Planning Authority for the South Tees Area. The SPD supports the economic and physical regeneration of the South Tees Area, setting out the vision and core objectives for the area and providing greater detail on how adopted planning policies will be interpreted. 2.2. The SPD is supported by the South Tees Regeneration Master Plan, which was prepared by the South Tees Development Corporation (STDC) and is a background study to the SPD. The STDC was established by the Tees Valley Mayor in August 2017 to promote the economic growth and commercial development of Tees Valley through the regeneration of the South Tees Area. 3. Initial Consultation – October 2017 3.1. On 18 October 2017, the STDC published its Draft South Tees Regeneration Master Plan for a period of public consultation that closed on the 8 December 2017. The Draft Masterplan was accompanied by the first draft of the South Tees Area SPD (then known as the South Tees Master Plan SPD) which was also subject to an informal consultation. 3.2. The Council has developed a comprehensive consultation database which includes residents, resident associations, elected representatives, community and voluntary groups, developers and businesses, infrastructure providers, government agencies and other prescribed bodies (as detailed in Regulation 6 Local Plan Consultation Statement April 2017 of The Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012). The current 1 consultee database contains over 2,700 contacts and all contacts on the database were notified, either via post or email, of the start and end of this consultation, the nature of the consultation and how comments on the consultation documents could be submitted. 3.3. In addition a number of notices and adverts were placed in the local press and on the websites of the STDC and the Council. A series of stakeholder events were also held with the following public exhibitions occurring during the consultation period: • Redcar & Cleveland Leisure and Community Heart – 18.10.2017 – 10am to 6pm; • Redcar & Cleveland Civic & Learning Centre, Normanby Road, South Bank – 20.10.2017 – 11am to 6pm; • Guisborough Library, 90 Westgate, Guisborough – 01.11.2017 – 11am to 6pm; • Central Library, Centre Square, Middlesbrough – 08.11.2017 – 10am to 6pm; • National Museum of the Royal Navy, Jackson Dock, Hartlepool – 15.11.2017 – 10am to 6pm; • Dolphin Centre, Horse Market, Darlington – 22.11.2017 – 10am to 6pm; • Stockton Central Library, Church Road, Stockton – 29.11.2017 – 10am to 6pm. 3.4. A total of 54 representations were received to the joint consultation. While many of these were received in relation to the STDC Master Plan only, all comments with relevance to the SPD were taken into account in the preparation of the South Tees Area SPD Consultation Draft March 2018 and, where necessary, changes were made to the document. A summary of all of the representations received during the initial consultation on the SPD and Master Plan and the Council’s response to them is provided within Appendix B. 4. Consultation on the SPD – March 2018 4.1. A second round of public consultation was undertaken on the SPD, and the associated documents, for a period of 4 weeks between 26 March and 22 April 2018. This was carried out in accordance with the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning Regulations 2012 and the Council’s Statement of Community Involvement. Particularly: • Notification of the consultation was be sent to all persons registered on the Council’s consultation database; 2 • The SPD, and accompanying Strategic Environmental Report and Habitat Regulations Assessment Screening Report, was published on the Council’s website; • A public notice was placed in the Evening Gazette newspaper; • Hard copies of the consultation documents were made available at the Council’s main offices and libraries across the borough. 4.2. Consultees were invited to submit comments online via the Council website (http://redcarcleveland-consult.limehouse.co.uk/portal), although comments submitted in writing via post or email were also accepted. 5. Summary of Consultation – March 2018 5.1. The Council received 13 responses to the second round of consultation. These were received from 1 individual and 12 organisations. 5.2. Following the closure of the consultation period, all of the submitted responses were considered by the Council and, where appropriate, the SPD was revised in response. The consultation responses received and the Council’s response to them are detailed within Appendix A. 3 Appendix A - Schedule of Responses for South Tees Area SPD Consultation Organisation Name Mr Philip Chisholm Reference COM_01 Page/Paragraph/ Principle STDC5 Comment: I feel a new communications route under the Tees would energise far more tourism Council Response: Comments noted. However, the SPD is prepared to and commerce than any of the schemes put forward. The tunnel at the mouth of the provide guidance for the development of the area and Tyne for pedestrians and bikes which is about to be reopened after refurbishment does not, itself, propose specific schemes. The used to support 20,000 journeys a day. https://www.facebook.com/River-Tees- comments have been forwarded to the South Tees Cycle-Tunnel-1418879898360375/ Development Corporation for consideration alongside the Master Plan for the site. Organisation Canal and River Trust Name Simon Tucker Reference COM_62 Page/Paragraph/ Principle All Comment: Having reviewed the document, the Canal & River Trust do not have any comment Council Response: Noted. to make on the SPD. Organisation Coal Authority Name Mr Christopher Telford Reference COM_51 Page/Paragraph/ Principle All Comment: Thank you for consulting The Coal Authority on the above. Having reviewed your Council Response: Noted. document, I confirm that we have no specific comments to make on it. Should you have any future enquiries please contact a member of Planning and Local Authority Liaison at The Coal Authority using the contact details above. Organisation Coast and Country Housing Name Mr Tom Hainey Page 1 of 26 Reference COM_50 Page/Paragraph/ Principle All Comment: On behalf of Coast & Country Housing, thank you for the opportunity to comment Council Response: Comments noted and support welcomed. on this draft of the South Tees Area SPD. Having reviewed the documents provided I am happy to confirm that we have no additional comments to make and offer our support of the document. As a key provider of affordable housing across the Tees Valley we support all efforts to grow our economy and support the communities and households that we serve. We also support all efforts to ensure that our local infrastructure is capable of effectively linking those who live in the homes we provide with the local job opportunities that will help them sustain and improve their quality of life and life opportunities. Finally, as a responsible business and substantial landlord, property developer and land owner, we support all efforts to ensure that our local and global environment and habitats are protected for the benefit of future generations. In adopting a balanced approach to the regeneration of our economy and protection of our environment the Supplementary Planning Document has our support. Organisation Environment Agency Name Louise Tait Reference COM_27 Page/Paragraph/ Principle STDC7 Comment: We support the aim set out in Development Principle STDC7: Environmental Council Response: Support welcomed Protection and Enhancement to deliver a strategy for the regeneration area which promotes the provision of green infrastructure including a series of connected open, private and public spaces, using open space as connectors not barriers to development. Page 2 of 26 Reference COM_28 Page/Paragraph/ Principle STDC9 Comment: We welcome the general approach to remediation of land as detailed in Council Response: Comments noted
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 ATTENDEES Members Mayor Ben Houchen (Chair) Tees Valley Mayor Councillor Heather Scott OBE Leader, Darlington Borough Co
    TEES VALLEY COMBINED AUTHORITY CABINET Friday 11th September 2020 at 10am Under the provisions of the Local Authorities and Police and Crime Panels (Coronavirus) (Flexibility of Local Authority and Police and Crime Panel Meetings) (England and Wales) Regulations 2020 this meeting took place via video link. These minutes are in draft form until approved at the next Cabinet meeting and are therefore subject to amendments. ATTENDEES Members Mayor Ben Houchen (Chair) Tees Valley Mayor Councillor Heather Scott OBE Leader, Darlington Borough Council Councillor Shane Moore Leader, Hartlepool Borough Council Councillor Bob Cook Leader, Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council Mayor Andy Preston Mayor of Middlesbrough Substitute Members Councillor Karen King Deputy Leader, Redcar and Cleveland Council Associate Members David Soley Vice Chair, Tees Valley Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP) Annabel Turpin Member of Tees Valley LEP Zoe Lewis Member of Tees Valley LEP Brenda McLeish Member of Tees Valley LEP Jerry Hopkinson Member of Tees Valley LEP Angela Howey Member of Tees Valley LEP Rachel Anderson Member of Tees Valley LEP Apologies for Absence Councillor Mary Lanigan Leader, Redcar and Cleveland Council Paul Booth Chair, Tees Valley Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP) Graham Robb Member of Tees Valley LEP Professor Paul Croney Member of Tees Valley LEP Officers and Others in Attendance Julie Gilhespie Chief Executive, Tees Valley Combined Authority (TVCA) Andrew Nixon Monitoring Officer, TVCA Gary Macdonald Group Director of Finance & Resources, TVCA Peter Judge Group Chief Legal Officer, TVCA Laura Metcalfe Governance Manager, TVCA Sally Henry Governance Officer, TVCA 1 John Sampson Managing Director, Redcar and Cleveland Council Ian Williams Director of Economic Growth, Darlington Borough Council Reuben Kench Director, Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council Tony Parkinson Chief Executive, Middlesbrough Council TVCA APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE 15/20 Apologies for absence were submitted as detailed above.
    [Show full text]
  • Friends of the Stockton & Darlington Railway
    Friends of the Stockton & Darlington Railway. WWW.SDR1825.org.uk. Registered Charity 1177252 A virtual meeting of the Trustees of the Friends of the Stockton and Darlington Railway was held on Thursday, the 3rd June, 2021. Present: Matthew Pease (President), Chris Lloyd (Vice President), Niall Hammond (Chairman), Alan Townsend (Vice Chairman and Assistant Secretary), Alan Macnab (Secretary), Ross Chisholm (Planning Officer), Peter Bainbridge (Membership Secretary), Norman Hugill. 1. Apologies for absence Apologies for absence were received from Caroline Hardie, Barry Thompson and Mike Renton. Niall Hammond informed the meeting that Jane Hackworth-Young will attend later in this meeting. 2. Minutes of the last Trustees Meeting The minutes of the last Trustees Meeting held on the 6th May, 2021 were presented. The meeting agreed that they were a true record of the proceedings. 3. Matters Arising Peter Bainbridge raised the issue of the Bellway site at Bowesfield, Stockton on Tees and asked for a progress report. Niall Hammond responded that he had written to Bellway Homes to ask that the area which was part of the Stockton and Darlington Railway was kept on a care and maintenance basis but he had not received a reply. 4. Declarations of Interests Niall Hammond declared an interest in the Cultural Recovery Fund payment. 5. Cultural Recovery Fund Niall Hammond left the meeting at this point and took no part in the discussions. The meeting was chaired by Alan Townsend. Alan Townsend explained that Niall Hammond as Project Manager had raised two points to consider before this meeting. In the discussions while he was "out of the room" at the Trustees meeting of 7th January, it was realised that the Trustees had management responsibilities over the satisfactory conclusion of work, and would be involved in the staging of payments to Trustees.
    [Show full text]
  • July 11, 2019 Business Leaders Point to Bright Future for the Tees Valley
    BUSINESS LEADERS POINT TO BRIGHT FUTURE FOR THE TEES VALLEY Nomi Ahmad (second right) sat on a panel with (left to right Frans Calje, CEO of PD Ports, Daren Smith, Site Director SABIC Petrochemicals UK and Sharon Lane, MD Tees Components. Not in picture Ben Houchen, Mayor of the Tees Valley. Nomi Ahmad joined a distinguished and influential panel of speakers at a special event aimed at Teesside’s burgeoning business community. Along with Tees Valley Mayor Ben Houchen, SABIC’s Site Director Daren Smith, PD Ports’ CEO Frans Calje and Tees Components MD Sharon Lane, Nomi was invited to “Talk Up Teesside” in a campaign organised by the media firm Tees Business. The 90-minute question and answer session saw the quartet share their views on the region’s business outlook. More than a hundred people flocked to the Wilton Centre near Redcar to listen to the panel discussion – billed by Tees Business as featuring “some the most influential business names in the region.” Sembcorp Utilities (UK) Limited Registered in England, Reg. No. 4636301 Registered Office: Sembcorp UK Headquarters, Wilton International, Middlesbrough TS90 8WS Nomi gave an upbeat explanation of Sembcorp’s UK growth strategy in the context of the opportunities presented by a volatile UK energy market and also highlighted the fundamental strengths of the main industrial base on Teesside. Both he and Ben Houchen listed a pipeline of projects with the potential to boost the economy of the area in the next few decades. The audience listened carefully as the panel members talked about plans to regenerate the former steelworks site adjacent to Wilton; to secure Teesside as a centre of manufacturing excellence for the offshore wind industry; the attraction to investors of the deepest port in Eastern England and Teesside’s superb industrial infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex a Ecology Survey Report 2020
    Dogger Bank C/Sofia Onshore Works Application Appendix 4 – Annex A Ecology Survey Report 2020 Classification: Internal Status: Draft Expiry date: N/A 1 of 28 Classification: Internal Status: Draft Expiry date: N/A 2 of 28 Doc. No. PM763-ARCUS-00001; 003655558-01 Rev. no. 01 Ecology Survey Report Valid from: July 2020 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 4 2 Methods ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 3 Results ........................................................................................................................................................... 8 Classification: Internal Status: Draft Expiry date: N/A 3 of 28 Doc. No. PM763-ARCUS-00001; 003655558-01 Rev. no. 01 Ecology Survey Report Valid from: July 2020 1 Introduction 1.1 Purpose of the Report This Report provides baseline information for the Ecology Assessment which supports the Environmental Appraisal submitted to support the planning application (the Application) made by Doggerbank Offshore Wind Farm Project 3 Projco Limited (the Projco) and Sofia Offshore Wind Farm Limited (SOWFL) (the Applicants), for consent pursuant to Section 62 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as amended. The Application includes five areas of alternative and additional infrastructure to the consented 9 kilometres (km) buried onshore grid connection, from approximately 1.5 km landward of the landfall for Dogger Bank Wind Farm C (DB-C) and Sofia Offshore Wind Farm (Sofia) to the National Grid at Lackenby Substation (the Works). 1.2 Development Context For the ease of reference, the Works, as shown in Figure 1.2 (a – c) of the Environmental Appraisal, is split into areas as below: Area 1 – A174 Crossing; Area 2 – South of Kirkleatham Memorial Park; Area 3 – Wilton East; Area 4 – Main Welfare Hub south of Wilton; and Area 5 – HVAC Cable Corridor.
    [Show full text]
  • Please Note Venue Scrutiny Co-Ordinating Committee Agenda
    PLEASE NOTE VENUE SCRUTINY CO-ORDINATING COMMITTEE AGENDA Friday 4 January 2008 at 2.00 p.m. at Owton Manor Community Centre, Wynyard Road, Hartlepool MEMBERS: SCRUTINY CO-ORDINATING COMMITTEE: Councillors Akers-Belcher, Brash, R W Cook, S Cook, Fleet, Flintoff, James, Laffey, A E Lilley, G Lilley, A Marshall, Plant, Preece, Shaw, Simmons and Wright. Resident Representatives: Jean Kennedy, Iris Ryder and Linda Shields 1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE 2. TO RECEIVE ANY DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST BY MEMBERS 3. MINUTES 3.1 To confirm the minutes of the meetings held on 2nd, 9th and 21st November 2007 (attached) 4. RESPO NS ES FROM THE CO UNCIL, THE EX ECUT IV E OR COMMI TT EES OF THE COUNCIL TO REPORTS OF THE SCRUTINY COORDINATING COMMITTEE No Items 5. CONSIDERATION OF REQUES T FOR SCRUTINY REVIEWS FROM COUNCIL, EX ECUTIV E MEMBERS AND NON EX ECUTIV E MEM BERS No Items 08.01.04 - SCR UTCOORD AGENDA Hartlepool Bor ough Council 1 PLEASE NOTE VENUE 6. FORWARD PLAN 6.1 Forward Plan: January 2008 – March 2008 - Scrutiny Manager 7. CONSIDERATION OF PROGRESS REPORTS / BUDGET AND POLICY FRAM EWORK DOCUM ENTS 7.1 2008/09 Budget and Policy Framework Proposals – Scrutiny Manager 8. CONSIDERATION OF FINANCIAL MONITORING/CORPORATE REPORTS 8.1 Quarter 2 – Corporate Plan and Revenue Financial Management Report 2007/2008 – Chief Financial Officer 8.2 Quarter 2 – NRF, Capital and Accountable Body Programme Monitoring Report 2007/2008 – Chief Financial Officer 9. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION 9.1 Adult and Community Services and Health Scrutiny Forum – Restructure Proposals – Chair of the Scrutiny Co-ordinating Committee 9.2 Funding of Contract Monitoring System – Explanation of the Adult and Public Health Portfolio Holder – Chair of the Adult and Community Services and Health Scrutiny Forum 9.3 Request for Items for Joint Cabinet / Scrutiny Event of 22 January 2008 – Scrutiny Manager 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Cleveland Naturalists'
    CLEVELAND NATURALISTS' FIELD CLUB RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Volume 5 Part 1 Spring 1991 CONTENTS Recent Sightings and Casual Notes CNFC Recording Events and Workshop Programme 1991 The Forming of a Field Study Group Within the CNFC Additions to Records of Fungi In Cleveland Recent Sightings and Casual Notes CNFC Recording Events and Workshop Programme 1991 The Forming of a Field Study Group Within the CNFC Additions to Records of Fungi In Cleveland CLEVELAND NATURALISTS' FIELD CLUB 111th SESSION 1991-1992 OFFICERS President: Mrs J.M. Williams 11, Kedleston Close Stockton on Tees. Secretary: Mrs J.M. Williams 11 Kedleston Close Stockton on Tees. Programme Secretaries: Misses J.E. Bradbury & N. Pagdin 21, North Close Elwick Hartlepool. Treasurer; Miss M. Gent 42, North Road Stokesley. Committee Members: J. Blackburn K. Houghton M. Yates Records sub-committee: A.Weir, M Birtle P.Wood, D Fryer, J. Blackburn M. Hallam, V. Jones Representatives: I. C.Lawrence (CWT) J. Blackburn (YNU) M. Birtle (NNU) EDITORIAL It is perhaps fitting that, as the Cleveland Naturalist's Field Club enters its 111th year in 1991, we should be celebrating its long history of natural history recording through the re-establishment of the "Proceedings". In the early days of the club this publication formed the focus of information desemmination and was published continuously from 1881 until 1932. Despite the enormous changes in land use which have occurred in the last 60 years, and indeed the change in geographical area brought about by the fairly recent formation of Cleveland County, many of the old records published in the Proceedings still hold true and even those species which have disappeared or contracted in range are of value in providing useful base line data for modern day surveys.
    [Show full text]
  • Minerals and Waste Core Strategy
    Tees Valley Joint Minerals and Waste Development Plan Documents In association with Core Strategy DPD Adopted September 2011 27333-r22.indd 1 08/11/2010 14:55:36 i ii Foreword The Tees Valley Minerals and Waste Development Plan Documents (DPDs) - prepared jointly by the boroughs of Darlington, Hartlepool, Middlesbrough, Redcar and Cleveland and Stockton-on-Tees - bring together the planning issues which arise from these two subjects within the sub-region. Two DPDs have been prepared. This Minerals and Waste Core Strategy contains the long-term spatial vision and the strategic policies needed to achieve the key objectives for minerals and waste developments in the Tees Valley. The separate Policies and Sites DPD, which conforms with it, identifies specific sites for minerals and waste development and sets out policies which will be used to assess minerals and waste planning applications. The DPDs form part of the local development framework and development plan for each Borough. They cover all of the five Boroughs except for the part within Redcar and Cleveland that lies within the North York Moors National Park. (Minerals and waste policies for that area are included in the national park’s own local development framework.) The DPDs were prepared during a lengthy process of consultation. This allowed anyone with an interest in minerals and waste in the Tees Valley the opportunity to be involved. An Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State carried out an Examination into the DPDs in early 2011. He concluded that they had been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and were sound.
    [Show full text]
  • The South Tees Development Corporation (Land at the Former Redcar Steel Works, Redcar) Compulsory Purchase Order 2019 Localism
    THE SOUTH TEES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (LAND AT THE FORMER REDCAR STEEL WORKS, REDCAR) COMPULSORY PURCHASE ORDER 2019 LOCALISM ACT 2011 AND THE ACQUISITION OF LAND ACT 1981 STATEMENT OF CASE OF THE ACQUIRING AUTHORITY Pursuant to Rule 7 of the Compulsory Purchase (Inquiries Procedure) Rules 2007 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 This document is the Statement of Case of South Tees Development Corporation (“STDC”) in its capacity as acquiring authority pursuant to Rule 7 of the Compulsory Purchase (Inquiries Procedure) Rules 2007 ("the Rules"). 1.2 On 10 April 2019, STDC made The South Tees Development Corporation (Land at the former Redcar Steel Works, Redcar) Compulsory Purchase Order 2019 (“the Order”) pursuant to section 207 of the Localism Act 2011 ("2011 Act"). STDC submitted the Order to the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government ("the Secretary of State") for confirmation on 11 April 2019. Twenty objections have been made to the Order. 1.3 The Secretary of State, by way of a letter dated 28 June 2019, confirmed his decision to delegate the decision as to whether to confirm the Order or not to an Inspector pursuant to section 14D of the Acquisition of Land Act 1981 ("1981 Act"). The Planning Inspectorate gave notice on 30 July 2019, that an inquiry would be held into the objections pursuant to Rule 3 of the Rules ("the Inquiry"). 1.4 This Statement sets out the basis of STDC's case for confirmation of the Order as will be put forward at the Inquiry. 1.5 The land the subject of the Order (“the Order Land”) lies within the STDC Area and comprises approximately 1,752 acres of land of the former Redcar Steel Works, Redcar, which is bounded by private access road known as Breakwater South Gare to the north, the Trunk Road (A1085) to the east, Tees Dock Road and South Bank to the south and the River Tees and Teesport to the West.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Wildlife and Geological Sites January 2017
    Redcar & Cleveland Local Wildlife and Geological Sites January 2017 this is Redcar & Cleveland 1 BACKGROUND 3 2 SCHEDULE OF LOCAL WILDLIFE SITES 5 3 SCHEDULE OF LOCAL GEOLOGICAL SITES 11 APPENDIX 1: Location Maps 15 2017 y anuar J te Upda Sites Geological and e ildlif W Local Redcar & Cleveland Local Plan 1 2 Local Wildlife and Geological Sites Update January 2017 R edcar & Cle v eland Local Plan 1. BACKGROUND What are Local Sites and why do we need them? 1.1 Local Sites can be Local Wildlife Sites (LWS) or Local Geological Sites (LGS). Local Wildlife Sites are areas of land which meet specific, objective criteria for nature conservation value. These criteria, which are based on the Defra guidance(1), have been decided locally by the Tees Valley Local Sites Partnership. The sites represent a range of important habitat types and variety of species that are of conservation concern. The Tees Valley RIGS (Regionally Important Geological Sites) group advises the Local Sites Partnership on the selection and management of Local Geological Sites, areas which they have identified as being of geological importance. 1.2 Local Sites can provide local contact with nature and opportunities for education, however designation as a Local Site does not confer any right of access. 1.3 Formerly known as Sites of Nature Conservation Interest (SNCIs) and RIGS, Local Sites are non-statutory site designations that have a lower level of protection than statutory designations, such as Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs). Local Sites, excluding those within the North York Moors National Park, currently receive protection from certain types of inappropriate development through our Local Development Framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Teesmouth Bird Club Newsletter
    Teesmouth Bird Club Newsletter August 2018 (No.70) Reg.Charity No.508850 CONTENTS Monthly Summaries 1 MONTHLY SUMMARIES CBTO News 7 With no replacement volunteer having come National seabird Census 7 forward, Chris Sharp reviews the birding Partial Repeat of CBBS 8 highlights of the spring and summer* periods News from the Committee 8 MARCH 2018-JUNE 2018 Local Outings, August to December 2018 9 MARCH 2018 TBC Evening Meetings 10 Book Review 10 New School Feeding station 11 English Coastal Path progress 12 New wetland for Cowpen Marsh 12 Titbits 14 WeBS Summary 2017/8 16 WeBS Summary Spring 2018 17 TBC Publications 19 Fieldfare and Redwing, garden Mike Tucker The TBC Newsletter is published three times a year. Compilation and layout Eric James, distribution Chris Sharp, The bitterly cold weather early in the month saw web download Jamie Duffie. many reports of Redwings, Fieldfares and Any material for inclusion in the Newsletter is welcome. Please Woodcock in urban gardens. Sadly there was little send contributions to [email protected] or by post to Eric James, 7 Hilderthorpe, Nunthorpe, Middlesbrough TS7 cold weather movement at the coast and as in the 0PT preceding few months many observers commented on the relative scarcity of sea ducks, divers and grebes. Eric James Teesmouth now has nationally significant numbers of Avocets (see page 17). Glaucous Gull, Windermere Road, Hartlepool Ian Forrest A Little Gull and a Puffin were in the river mouth on 2nd. A single Brent Goose was around RSPB Saltholme from 3rd. A Glaucous Gull was at Hartlepool on 4th.
    [Show full text]
  • Skinningrove Valley Trail
    Skinningrove Zig Zag Railway Project is a joint venture The Story of the Merman between Cleveland Ironstone Mining Museum and Cleveland Model Railway Club. One story about Skinningrove’s past that is still See their websites for information about this recounted is that of the “sea-man” or merman who ambitious project to build a working scale model of allegedly visited in about 1530. Writing in the early Loftus mine, the internal railway system and part of 17th century, William Camden states “Upon the shore, the zig zag connection to the main line. Skengrave, a small village, thrives by the great variety of fish which it takes; where it is reported that, seventy years ago, they caught a sea-man, who lived upon raw fish for some days, but at last, taking his opportunity, he made his escape into his own element. When the winds are laid and the sea is calm… a hideous groaning is oftentimes heard in these parts on a sudden, and then the fishermen are afraid to go to sea.” Another account claims that during his stay “fayre maidens were welcomest guests to his harbour, whome he woulde beholde with a very earnest countenaynce, as if his phlegmatic breast had been touched with the sparke of love.” (J.W. Ord 1846) Skinningrove Station above the village on the Loftus to Middlesbrough line. It opened in 1875 and closed in 1958. Skinningrove in 1846 The following description is taken from “The History and Antiquities of Cleveland” by John Walker Ord, published in 1846. Skinningrave, a small village lying in a low deep creek of the sea, presents many charms to the admirer of the romantic and picturesque.
    [Show full text]
  • Waste Arisings and Waste Management Capacity Model
    Addendum to 2012 study: Waste Arisings and Waste Management Capacity Model Durham County Council June 2018 Addendum to 2012 study: Waste Arisings and Waste Management Capacity Model Disclaimer Anthesis Consulting Group PLC has prepared this report for the sole use of Durham County Council and for the intended purposes as stated in the agreement between Anthesis and Durham County Council under which this report was completed. Anthesis has exercised due and customary care in preparing this report but has not, save as specifically stated, independently verified information provided by others. No other warranty, express or implied, is made in relation to the contents of this report. The use of this report, or reliance on its content, by unauthorised third parties without written permission from Anthesis shall be at their own risk, and Anthesis accepts no duty of care to such third parties. Any recommendations, opinions or findings stated in this report are based on facts and circumstances as they existed at the time the report was prepared. Any changes in such facts and circumstances may adversely affect the recommendations, opinions or findings contained in this report. Anthesis Consulting Group, 2018 1 Addendum to 2012 study: Waste Arisings and Waste Management Capacity Model Addendum to 2012 study: Waste Arisings and Waste Management Capacity Model Durham County Council Prepared for: Prepared by: Spatial Policy Team Anthesis Consulting Group Regeneration & Local Services Development The Future Centre, Durham County Council 9 Newtec Place,
    [Show full text]