DOCSLIB.ORG

Common Eiders in the Intertidal Zone of Passamaquoddy Bay

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Common Eiders in the Intertidal Zone of Passamaquoddy Bay COMlMUNITY CONSEQUENCES OF HABITAT USE AND PREDATION BY COMMON EIDERS IN THE INTERTIDAL ZONE OF PASSAMAQUODDY BAY A thesis Presented to The Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Guelph by DIANA JEANNE HAMILTON In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy November, 1997 0 Diana J. Hamilton, 1997 NationaI Library Bibliothèque nationale du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie SeMces services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395, nie Wellington OttawaON K1AW OttawaON KtAON4 Canada canada The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, disûiiute or sell reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microfoq vendre des copies de cette thèse sous pqer or electronic formats. la fome de microfiche/fïlm, de reproduction sur papier ou sur fomat électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fiom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimes reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. ABSTRACT COMMUNTY CONSEQUENCES OF HABITAT USE AND PREDATION BY COMMON EIDERS IN THE INTERTIDAL ZONE OF PASSAMAQUODDY BAY Diana Jeanne Hamilton Advisor: University of Guelph, 1997 Professor T. D. Nudds 1 investigated interactions between Common Eiders (Somaterza mollissima) and the intertidal invertebrate comrnunity in Passamaquoddy Bay. New Brunswick. 1 determined that young duckiings were dependent on rockweed (AscophyfIumnodosum), a perenniai macro aiga, to obtain food, as indicated by their feeding methods and timing, but that feeding by older duckiings was unaffected by tide level. Commercial harvest of rockweed may therefore be detrimental to the youngest duckhgs, but have little effect on older birds. 1 also found that care of ducklings constrained female behaviour and habitat use. This may be a local effect caused by very high predation pressure exerted on duckiings at this site. Addt eiders were site-selective predators of blue mussels (Mytzhs eduiis), and preferences varied depending on season and prey availability. Selection of prey corresponded with predictions of the sheil mass minimization hypothesis and also with the nsk-averse foraging hypothesis. Using a series of predator exclusion cages, 1 found that in musse1 beds, ducks had little effect on species richness or diversity, but sigdicantly reduced total biomass by feeding primarily on blue mussels. Biomass effects persisted throughout the experiment in sites subjected to abiotic disturbance, but disappeared in undishirbed sites within a year. Exclusion of ducks led to an increase in dogwhelks (Nucella hpzllus) under natural site cages, and by feeding on blue mussels they obscured the effect of eider predation. This indirect effect is an example of compensatory predation by a formerly redundant predator. Effis of eider predation on rockweed bed invertebrate biornass were small, and again duck predation did not influence species nchness or diversity. Harvest of rockweed had no effect on invertebrate abundance, and little eff'on predation by ducks. DiBerences in results between the two areas can be attributed to habitat heterogeneity and relative abundance of whelks. Although the effect on biomass was not measurable, predation by ducks may have contnbuted to maintenance of rockweed habitat. When ducks were excluded, substrate cover by blue mussels increased and rockweed declined. These redts indicate that ducks are signifiicant predators in this community, and that waterfowl should not be neglected as predators in community studies. ACKNOWISDGEMENTS 1 am gratefid to mam, people for helping me with various aspects of this research. First, 1 would like to th& my advisor, Tom Nudds, for his advice, support, encouragement, and patience during the past four years. 1am grateful to my advisory committee members, Dave Ankney, Eiizabeth Bodding, and Peter Yodzis for advice and suggestions throughout rny degree, and for helpfbl comments on my thesis. I would also like to thank John FryxeLI for helpful comments and insightfbl questions at various times, which ultimately improved the thesis. 1 am gratefid to members of my examination conmittee, Sandy Middleton, Tim Wootton, John Fryxe11, Peter Yodzis, and Tom Nudds for helpfid changes to the thesis. Thanks to Claudia Schubert-Kuener, Mark mer, Carey Bergman, Brent Gurd, and Chris McLaughlin for quizzing me before my quakfjmg exam, making usefbi suggestions, and providing much needed distractions when 1 was in Guelph. I received a great deal of help with the field and lab components of this research. Co~aBrdar, Andrea Cox, Danielle Downing, Jim Godfiey, Jennifer Neate, Kim Smith, and especiaily Cindy Doherty provided excellent field assistance. Biii Hogans provided adult ducks, and Glyn Sharp, Ian Barkhouse, and Pat Kehoe provided ducklings for food habits analysis. Discussions with GIyn Sharp and Pat Kehoe early in the study were helpful. The Engineering department at the University of New Brunswick (Saint John) aiiowed me to use the tensometer to cmsh blue mussels and Cedric Boone provided assistance. 1 am grateful to ail these people. 1 would also keto thank the staff of Huntsman Marine Science Centre for assistance while conducting research there, and the biology department at the University of New Brunswick (Saint John) for aliowing me to use slide making equipment. 1 wish to acknowledge and thank the foiiowing organkitions for providing research funding for this project: Institute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research (IWWR), Delta Waterfowl Foundation, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC)(research grant to T. D. Nudds), New Brunswick Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture, Canadian Wddlife Service University Research Support Fund. Personal fiinding was provided through: NSERC Postgraduate Fellowship, Ontario Graduate Scholarship, Bomeycastle FeUowship (MrWR), Elgin Card Avian Ecology Scholarship (University of Guelph), Hunt sman Graduate Scholarship (Huntsman Marine Science Centre), Faculty of Graduate Shidies Scholarship (University of Guelph) . FinaUy, 1 would like to thank my husband, Matthew Litvak. He helped me with the field work that nobody else wanted to do, read and commented on my thesis, gave me many helpfùl suggestions, and supported and encouraged me throughout. LIST OF TABLES 1.1 .Redts of MANOVAS of duck age and tirne of day on behaviour ...........................15 1-2 O Results of MANOVAS of duck age and tide level on behaviour ..............................-22 1-3 .Results of ANOVA of duck feeding time................................................................. -29 2.1 - Redts of x2 analyses of prey seleetion experiments................................................ -51 3.1 - Effects tested in ANOVA and MANOVA models ....................................................84 3 -2- Results of ANOVAs of total biomass, species diverzity, and species richness ......... 93 3 -3 - Results of MANOVA of cornmon species dry tissue biomass .................................. 96 4.1 - Results of ANOVAs of total biornass and biomass of periwinkles and whellcs ..... -141 4.2 - Resuks of analyses of blue musse1 and rockweed cover in cages and controls...... -157 4.3 - Cornparison of rockweed and musse1 bed habitat .................................................. -163 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1.1 .Behaviour of ducklings and adults at the four tide levels .......................................... 18 1 -2 .Behaviour of eiders at different times of the day ...................................................... -21 1 -3 - Behaviour of ducklings and adults at dBerent hesof the day ............................... 25 1.4 - The spent feediag for ducks in each age group .............................................. 31 2.1 - Tiles used in prey selection experiments.................................................................. -46 2.2 - Size fiequency distributions of mussels collected at Indian Point and Barr Road -34 2.3 - Tissue content of mussels collecteci at different times of the year .......................... 36 2.4 - Regressions of sheli thickness and cmsbg resistance on shell length ..................... 59 2.5 - Shell mass eaten by ducks and profitability of mussels of difEerent sizes................. 61 3.1 - Diagram of an experimental site............................................................................... -79 3 -2- Dry tissue biornass in cage and control areas ............................................................ 87 3 -3 - Species richness in cage and wntrol areas ................................................................ 90 3 -4- Species diversity in cage and control areas ................................................................ 92 3 -5 - Dq tissue biomass of blue mussels in cage and control areas................................ 100 3.6 - Dry tissue biomass of wheks in cage and control areas........................................ -102 3 -7- Average musse1 length in cage and control areas................................................... -105 3.8 - Size fiequency distributions of mussels collected from cages and wntrols ............ 107 3 -9 - Dry tissue biomass in cage and control areas
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Spectacled Eiders He Spectacled Eider Is Truly a Breed Apart
    WILDLIFE AND GLOBAL WARMING Navigating the Arctic Meltdown © GARY KRAMER/GARY KRAMER.NET SPECTACLED EIDERS he spectacled eider is truly a breed apart. A diving duck named for its distinctively T“spectacled” appearance, the eider spends much of the year in places so remote that its wintering grounds were only discovered in 1999, with the help of space-age satellite tracking. With its American population decimated by poisoning from ingesting lead shot, the eider was listed as a threatened species in 1993. Now global warming poses an additional peril to this unique bird, with the potential to alter both the eiders’ breeding and wintering habitats. A Rare Bird Pacific; more nutrients are flushed into the shallow seas by The spectacled eider is a medium-sized sea duck, slightly Alaska’s great river systems. These nutrients nourish algae smaller than a mallard, but with a stockier appearance. and microscopic plants called phytoplankton, which grow Males have a white back, a black breast and belly, a thick in huge numbers in the shallow waters. Algae are then orange bill and a green head, offset by large white eye eaten by tiny animals called zooplankton, which in turn patches bordered in black—the characteristic “spectacles” serve as food for larger animals. Particles of food, dead that give the bird its name. The female is a drab, speckled algae and nutrients “rain” down onto the sea floor, feeding brown, with less distinct tan spectacles. a huge array of clams, crustaceans and marine worms Each winter, the world’s entire population of spectacled throughout the year.
    [Show full text]
  • King Eiders Mated with Common Eiders in Iceland
    KING EIDERS MATED WITH COMMON EIDERS IN ICELAND BY OLIN SEWALL PETTINGILL, JR. HE Common Eider (Somateriu mollissima) is one of Icelands’ most T abundant birds, with an estimated breeding population of a half million individuals (see Pettingill, 1959). Th e majority nest in colonies whose sizes range from a few pairs to many hundreds. From May 24 to 27, 1958, it was my good fortune to study and film one of the largest colonies (5,000 nests), situated on the farm of Gisli Vagnsson, along the DyrafjSrdur in Northwest Iceland. Egg-laying at this time was virtually completed, with incubation just getting under way. In my earlier paper (op. cit.) I have described the colony and pointed out that the males were present, each one stationed close to a nest while his mate sat on it. Many nests were near together-in a few cases as close as two feet, with the result that there was marked hostility among the guarding males. Presumably the males departed from the colony after the first ten days of incubation as they did on the Inner Farne (Tinbergen, 1958)) an island off the northeast coast of England. Before I visited the Vagnsson colony, Dr. Finnur Gudmundsson, Curator in the Natural History Museum at Reykjavik, told me that I should expect to find from one to several male King Eiders (S. spectabilis) mated with female Common Eiders. He had noted many mixed pairs himself in various Iceland colonies and once published an account of his observations (Gudmundsson, 1932:96-97). He went on to say that such matings are of “frequent occur- rence” in Iceland and have been known about since the 18th Century.
    [Show full text]
  • Visualizing Populations of North American Sea Ducks: Maps to Guide Research and Management Planning
    Prepared in Cooperation with the Sea Duck Joint Venture Continental Technical Team Visualizing Populations of North American Sea Ducks: Maps to Guide Research and Management Planning Open-File Report 2019–1142 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Male long-tailed duck. (Photograph by Ryan Askren, U.S. Geological Survey, public domain.) Prepared in Cooperation with the Sea Duck Joint Venture Continental Technical Team Visualizing Populations of North American Sea Ducks: Maps to Guide Research and Management Planning By John M. Pearce, Paul L. Flint, Mary E. Whalen, Sarah A. Sonsthagen, Josh Stiller, Vijay P. Patil, Timothy Bowman, Sean Boyd, Shannon S. Badzinski, H. Grant Gilchrist, Scott G. Gilliland, Christine Lepage, Pam Loring, Dan McAuley, Nic R. McLellan, Jason Osenkowski, Eric T. Reed, Anthony J. Roberts, Myra O. Robertson, Tom Rothe, David E. Safine, Emily D. Silverman, and Kyle Spragens Open-File Report 2019–1142 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior David Bernhardt, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey James F. Reilly II, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2019 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov/ or call 1–888–ASK–USGS (1–888–275–8747). For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https:/store.usgs.gov. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Sea Duck Curriculum Revised
    Sea Ducks of Alaska Activity Guide Acknowledgments Contact Information: Project Coordinator: Marilyn Sigman, Center for Alaskan Coastal Studies Education: Written By: Sea Duck Activity Guide, Teaching Kit and Display: Elizabeth Trowbridge, Center for Alaskan Coastal Marilyn Sigman Center for Alaskan Coastal Studies Studies P.O. Box 2225 Homer, AK 99603 Illustrations by: (907) 235-6667 Bill Kitzmiller, Conrad Field and Fineline Graphics [email protected] (Alaska Wildlife Curriculum Illustrations), Elizabeth Alaska Wildlife Curricula Trowbridge Robin Dublin Wildlife Education Coordinator Reviewers: Alaska Dept. of Fish & Game Marilyn Sigman, Bree Murphy, Lisa Ellington, Tim Division of Wildlife Conservation Bowman, Tom Rothe 333 Raspberry Rd. Anchorage, AK 99518-1599 (907)267-2168 Funded By: [email protected] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Alaska Coastal Program and Scientific/technical Information: The Alaska Department of Fish and Game, State Duck Tim Bowman Stamp Program Sea Duck Joint Venture Coordinator (Pacific) The Center for Alaskan Coastal Studies would like to thank U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service the following people for their time and commitment to sea 1011 E. Tudor Rd. duck education: Tim Bowman, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Anchorage, AK 99503 Service, Sea Duck Joint Venture Project, for providing (907) 786-3569 background technical information, photographs and [email protected] support for this activity guide and the sea duck traveling SEADUCKJV.ORG display; Tom Rothe and Dan Rosenberg of the Alaska Department of Fish and Game for technical information, Tom Rothe presentations and photographs for both the sea duck Waterfowl Coordinator traveling display and the activity guide species identifica- Alaska Dept. of Fish & Game tion cards; John DeLapp, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Information
    Supporting Information Balk et al. 10.1073/pnas.0902903106 Movie S1. A paralyzed herring gull (Larus argentatus). This movie shows a specimen from the County of So¨ dermanland (region G in Fig. 1). Both wings are equally paralyzed and the beak has no strength, whereas mobility and control of the head still remain. In this work we demonstrate that the probability to remedy an individual in this condition by thiamine treatment is very high. The movie is taken in the field, but the specimen is placed on a black tablecloth in order to remove disturbing background and enhance contrast. Movie S1 (AVI) Other Supporting Information Files SI Appendix Balk et al. www.pnas.org/cgi/content/short/0902903106 1of1 Supporting Information Wild birds of declining European species are dying from a thiamine deficiency syndrome L. Balk*, P.-Å. Hägerroth, G. Åkerman, M. Hanson, U. Tjärnlund, T. Hansson, G. T. Hallgrimsson, Y. Zebühr, D. Broman, T. Mörner, H. Sundberg *Corresponding author: [email protected] Contents Pages M & M Materials and Methods. 2–10 Text S1 Additional bird species affected by the paralytic disease. 11 Text S2 Additional results for eggs. 12–13 Text S3 Results for liver body index (LBI) in pulli. 14–15 Text S4 Breeding output and population estimates. 16–18 Text S5 Elaborated discussion of important aspects. 19–27 Acknowl. Further acknowledgements. 28 Fig. S1 a–j The 83 locations where samples were collected. 29–30 Fig. S2 a–d Pigmentation changes in the iris of the herring gull (Larus argentatus). 31 Fig. S3 Liver α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase (KGDH) in common black-headed gull (Chroicocephalus ridibundus).
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Field Naturalist Published by the Florida Ornithological Society
    Florida Field Naturalist PUBLISHED BY THE FLORIDA ORNITHOLOGICAL SOCIETY VOL. 47, NO. 4 NOVEMBER 2019 PAGES 131-183 Florida Field Naturalist 47(4):131-143, 2019. A HISTORY OF COMMON EIDER (Somateria mollissima) OCCURRENCES AND HABITS IN NORTHEAST FLORIDA (NASSAU, DUVAL, AND ST. JOHNS COUNTIES) KEVIN E. DAILEY 6661 Beatrix Drive, Jacksonville, Florida 32226 Email: [email protected] Abstract.—The Common Eider (Somateria mollissima) is the most widely studied sea duck in North America, but most research on this species has focused on its breed- ing ecology, diet, and the effects of contaminants on mortality. Thus, there is an interest in and need to better understand the species’ range, habits, and demography outside of its breeding range. This article summarizes the twenty-six known individuals across twenty-one reported occurrences of Common Eider in northeast Florida dating back to 1970 and includes information about certain habits that corroborate known characteris- tics while challenging other existing understandings about the species. INTRODUCTION The Common Eider (Somateria mollissima) is the largest duck in the Northern Hemisphere, and four subspecies are recognized in North America. While it is the most widely studied sea duck in North America, the majority of studies are based on breeding ecology, diet, and the effects of contaminants on mortality. There is a clear interest in and need for better understanding of the species’ range, habits, and demography outside of its breeding range (Goudie et al. 2000). The four subspecies’ range and occurrence outside their respective breeding grounds are not entirely well understood, but it is assumed that Common Eiders reaching the state of Florida are of the “American” race, S.
    [Show full text]
  • European Red List of Birds
    European Red List of Birds Compiled by BirdLife International Published by the European Commission. opinion whatsoever on the part of the European Commission or BirdLife International concerning the legal status of any country, Citation: Publications of the European Communities. Design and layout by: Imre Sebestyén jr. / UNITgraphics.com Printed by: Pannónia Nyomda Picture credits on cover page: Fratercula arctica to continue into the future. © Ondrej Pelánek All photographs used in this publication remain the property of the original copyright holder (see individual captions for details). Photographs should not be reproduced or used in other contexts without written permission from the copyright holder. Available from: to your questions about the European Union Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00 800 numbers or these calls may be billed Published by the European Commission. A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (http://europa.eu). Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication. ISBN: 978-92-79-47450-7 DOI: 10.2779/975810 © European Union, 2015 Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Printed in Hungary. European Red List of Birds Consortium iii Table of contents Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................................................1 Executive summary ...................................................................................................................................................5 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Foraging Ecology of Great Black-Backed and Herring Gulls on Kent Island in the Bay of Fundy by Rolanda J Steenweg Submitted In
    Foraging Ecology of Great Black-backed and Herring Gulls on Kent Island in the Bay of Fundy By Rolanda J Steenweg Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Honours Bachelor of Science in Environmental Science at: Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia April 2010 Supervisors: Dr. Robert Ronconi Dr. Marty Leonard ENVS 4902 Professor: Dr. Daniel Rainham TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT 3 1. INTRODUCTION 4 2. LITERATURE REVIEW 7 2.1 General biology and reproduction 7 2.2 Composition of adult and chick gull diets - changes over the breeding season8 2.3 General similarities and differences between gull species 9 2.4Predation on Common Eider Ducklings 10 2.5Techniques 10 3. MATERIALS AND METHODS 13 3.1 Study site and species 13 3.2 Lab Methods 16 3.3 Data Analysis 17 4. RESULTS 18 4.1 Pellet and regurgitate samples 19 4.2 Stable isotope analysis 21 4.3 Estimates of diet 25 5. DISCUSSION 26 5.1 Main components of diet 26 5.2 Differences between species and age classes 28 5.3 Variability between breeding stages 30 5.4 Seasonal trends in diet 32 5.5 Discrepancy between plasma and red blood cell stable isotope signatures 32 6. CONCLUSION, LIMITATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 33 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 35 REFERENCES 36 2 ABSTRACT I studied the foraging ecology of the generalist predators Great Black-backed (Larusmarinus) and Herring (Larusargentatus) Gulls on Kent Island, in the Bay of Fundy. To study diet, I collected pellets casted in and around nests supplemented with tissue samples (red blood cells, plasma, head feathers and primary feathers) obtained from chicks and adults for stable isotope analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Part B: for Private and Commercial Use
    RESTRICTED ANIMAL LIST (PART B) §4-71-6.5 PART B: FOR PRIVATE AND COMMERCIAL USE SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME INVERTEBRATES PHYLUM Annelida CLASS Oligochaeta ORDER Haplotaxida FAMILY Lumbricidae Lumbricus rubellus earthworm, red PHYLUM Arthropoda CLASS Crustacea ORDER Amphipoda FAMILY Gammaridae Gammarus (all species in genus) crustacean, freshwater; scud FAMILY Hyalellidae Hyalella azteca shrimps, imps (amphipod) ORDER Cladocera FAMILY Sididae Diaphanosoma (all species in genus) flea, water ORDER Cyclopoida FAMILY Cyclopidae Cyclops (all species in genus) copepod, freshwater ORDER Decapoda FAMILY Alpheidae Alpheus brevicristatus shrimp, Japan (pistol) FAMILY Palinuridae Panulirus gracilis lobster, green spiny Panulirus (all species in genus lobster, spiny except Panulirus argus, P. longipes femoristriga, P. pencillatus) FAMILY Pandalidae Pandalus platyceros shrimp, giant (prawn) FAMILY Penaeidae Penaeus indicus shrimp, penaeid 49 RESTRICTED ANIMAL LIST (Part B) §4-71-6.5 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Penaeus californiensis shrimp, penaeid Penaeus japonicus shrimp, wheel (ginger) Penaeus monodon shrimp, jumbo tiger Penaeus orientalis (chinensis) shrimp, penaeid Penaeus plebjius shrimp, penaeid Penaeus schmitti shrimp, penaeid Penaeus semisulcatus shrimp, penaeid Penaeus setiferus shrimp, white Penaeus stylirostris shrimp, penaeid Penaeus vannamei shrimp, penaeid ORDER Isopoda FAMILY Asellidae Asellus (all species in genus) crustacean, freshwater ORDER Podocopina FAMILY Cyprididae Cypris (all species in genus) ostracod, freshwater CLASS Insecta
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Volume 2
    Appendix F Species List Appendix F: Species List F. Species List F.1 Lists The following list and three tables denote the bird, mammal, fish, and plant species known to occur in Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (Arctic Refuge, Refuge). F.1.1 Birds of Arctic Refuge A total of 201 bird species have been recorded on Arctic Refuge. This list describes their status and abundance. Many birds migrate outside of the Refuge in the winter, so unless otherwise noted, the information is for spring, summer, or fall. Bird names and taxonomic classification follow American Ornithologists' Union (1998). F.1.1.1 Definitions of classifications used Regions of the Refuge . Coastal Plain – The area between the coast and the Brooks Range. This area is sometimes split into coastal areas (lagoons, barrier islands, and Beaufort Sea) and inland areas (uplands near the foothills of the Brooks Range). Brooks Range – The mountains, valleys, and foothills north and south of the Continental Divide. South Side – The foothills, taiga, and boreal forest south of the Brooks Range. Status . Permanent Resident – Present throughout the year and breeds in the area. Summer Resident – Only present from May to September. Migrant – Travels through on the way to wintering or breeding areas. Breeder – Documented as a breeding species. Visitor – Present as a non-breeding species. * – Not documented. Abundance . Abundant – Very numerous in suitable habitats. Common – Very likely to be seen or heard in suitable habitats. Fairly Common – Numerous but not always present in suitable habitats. Uncommon – Occurs regularly but not always observed because of lower abundance or secretive behaviors.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Material
    Somateria mollissima (Common Eider) European Red List of Birds Supplementary Material The European Union (EU27) Red List assessments were based principally on the official data reported by EU Member States to the European Commission under Article 12 of the Birds Directive in 2013-14. For the European Red List assessments, similar data were sourced from BirdLife Partners and other collaborating experts in other European countries and territories. For more information, see BirdLife International (2015). Contents Reported national population sizes and trends p. 2 Trend maps of reported national population data p. 5 Sources of reported national population data p. 8 Species factsheet bibliography p. 13 Recommended citation BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Further information http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/info/euroredlist http://www.birdlife.org/europe-and-central-asia/european-red-list-birds-0 http://www.iucnredlist.org/initiatives/europe http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/conservation/species/redlist/ Data requests and feedback To request access to these data in electronic format, provide new information, correct any errors or provide feedback, please email [email protected]. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds Somateria mollissima (Common Eider) Table 1. Reported national breeding population size and trends in Europe1. Country (or Population estimate Short-term population
    [Show full text]
  • The Status and Occurrence of Common Eider (Somateria Mollissima) in British Columbia
    The Status and Occurrence of Common Eider (Somateria mollissima) in British Columbia. By Rick Toochin and Jamie Fenneman. Introduction and Distribution The Common Eider (Somateria mollissima) is one of the widest ranging of all eider species, and is the only one to regularly occur in temperate regions of the northern hemisphere (Goudie et al. 2000). All other eider species are largely confined to arctic and subarctic regions (Goudie et al. 2000). In North America, it breeds from south-coastal Alaska and throughout the Bering Sea, including the Aleutian Islands, east across the arctic coast of Alaska and Canada to Hudson Bay, Quebec, Labrador, Newfoundland, and the Maritime provinces (Goudie et al. 2000, Dunn and Alderfer 2011). It also breeds along the coast of the northeast United States, south to Massachusetts, as well as throughout most of the islands of the Canadian arctic, north to Ellesmere Island, and along the coasts of Greenland (Goudie et al. 2000, Dunn and Alderfer 2011). It retreats south in winter, with western arctic populations wintering in the Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands, and south coastal Alaska and eastern populations wintering in Hudson Bay and along the Atlantic coast from Labrador south to North Carolina (Goudie et al. 2000, Sibley 2000). It is rare but regular on the Great Lakes, and casual inland in eastern and central North America during winter and migration (Mlodinow 1999). Outside of North America, the Common Eider also occurs in Iceland, along the coasts of northwest Europe: including the United Kingdom, Ireland, and Scandinavia, and in eastern Russia along the eastern Siberian coast, Bering Sea coast, and the Kamchatka Peninsula (Brazil 2009, Mullarney and Zetterstrom 2009).
    [Show full text]