DOCSLIB.ORG

Club Regulations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Club Regulations Conditions of Contest (Club Regulations) Prepared by: John Nichols March 2012 Revised May 19, 2013 Indianapolis Bridge Center Conditions of Contest Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 General Conditions ............................................................................................... 1 Applicability to Guest Clubs ................................................................................ 2 Entry and Participation ......................................................................................... 3 Director in Charge ................................................................................................ 4 Alerts and Announcements ................................................................................... 4 Allowed Conventions ........................................................................................... 4 Convention Cards ................................................................................................. 5 Seating (Reserved Seating) ................................................................................... 5 Seeding .................................................................................................................. 5 Spectators .............................................................................................................. 6 Children at the IBC ............................................................................................... 7 Late Arrival ........................................................................................................... 7 Slow Play .............................................................................................................. 7 Psychs ................................................................................................................... 8 Strong 2. Opening Bids .....................................................................................11 Score Corrections ................................................................................................12 Appeals ...............................................................................................................14 Cell Phones .........................................................................................................14 Smoking Prohibited ............................................................................................15 Appendices ..........................................................................................................16 A – Psychs –Article by Mike Flader ...............................................................16 B - Psychs – From Duplicate Decisions ..........................................................19 C - Appeal Procedures .....................................................................................21 5/19/2013 3:50 PM i Indianapolis Bridge Center Conditions of Contest Introduction The following are the Conditions of Contest (rules and regulations) of the Indianapolis Bridge Center. They have been gathered from several sources. Some are from the ACBL, some are from the IBC Board of Directors, and some are from Club Management. When this document was originally put together (February 2010), nothing here was new. Each item had been published somewhere before. When items are added they will be announced in the IBC Newsletter. These Conditions of Contest will be made available to all players and visitors to the Bridge Center by being printed in binders to be kept in each playing room and by publication on the club website (www.indianapolisbridge.com) General Conditions The Indianapolis Bridge Center (IBC) conducts it games in accordance with the current version of the "Laws of Duplicate Contract Bridge" as promulgated in the Western Hemisphere by the American Contract Bridge League (ACBL) and throughout the world by the World Bridge Federation (WBF). In addition we follow the Regulations and Conditions of Contest set out by the ACBL. The ACBL’s regulations are primarily set forth for tournament play. The ACBL permits clubs to modify (and expand on) those regulations. This document sets out the IBCs additions and modifications. There are a number of places in this document that refer to regulations published on the ACBL’s website. They can be found at www.acbl.org. Lack of Knowledge does not constitute cause for exemption. These conditions apply to all events sponsored by the Indianapolis Bridge Center. For some events there will be additional specific conditions published, either by the IBC or by the ACBL. in cases where there is disagreement between these conditions and more specific ones the more specific conditions will take precedence. 5/19/2013 3:50 PM 1 Indianapolis Bridge Center Conditions of Contest The final decision on any and all items in these conditions shall be made by the Director-in-Charge. Furthermore, any matter not specifically covered will be decided by the Director-in-Charge. Applicability to Guest Clubs These conditions will be applied to games sponsored by our guest clubs unless they specifically publish their own conditions. In addition, they may publish amendments to certain portions or may add new sections of their own. If the IBC is provided with those changes they will be included with this document for the convenience of their players. The current status of conditions for our guest clubs are: The Newcomers DBC - not yet determined. The Friday DBC - not yet determined. Women’s Contract Bridge - not yet determined. 5/19/2013 3:50 PM 2 Indianapolis Bridge Center Conditions of Contest Entry and Participation IBC events are open to all Bridge Players unless the event is restricted or the player is under discipline from the Bridge Center or from the ACBL that prohibits participation. Some of our games are restricted in one or more of the following ways: An upper limit (or rarely a lower limit) on the number of masterpoints that a player may have. Gender (Women’s Contract Club) Marital Status (Married couples game and Singles game) Informal or casual dress is usually acceptable and appropriate. Conformity to generally acceptable standards of decency and cleanliness is expected. Directors may, subject to consultation with club management, refuse to sell an entry to a person or persons inappropriately dressed or not conforming to the above standards. Wagering on the results of an IBC sponsored event is specifically prohibited. Any player found guilty of any form of such betting in a game or tournament is liable to severe disciplinary action. Each player agrees that all, or portions, of the event may be filmed, recorded or otherwise documented or publicized at the discretion of the IBC, and that this documentation may be used without charge by any news medium, the IBC or the ACBL. The refusal of a player, pair or team in an IBC sponsored game to play against another player, pair or team duly entered in the event shall require the disqualification of the player, pair or team refusing to play from further participation in the event and the forfeiture of any masterpoints earned by the player, pair or team in the event. Such refusal shall constitute conduct unbecoming a player at the IBC and shall be referred to the club manager and the IBC Board of Directors for appropriate disciplinary action. 5/19/2013 3:50 PM 3 Indianapolis Bridge Center Conditions of Contest Director in Charge The director assigned to run a game is the “Director-in-Charge.” The Director- in-Charge is responsible for the orderly running of the game. While they may consult with other directors, club management, the ACBL, or anyone else they think appropriate, the Director-in-Charge is the final authority for the game on matters of Law and Regulation. Alerts and Announcements The Indianapolis Bridge Center follows the ACBL regulations on alerting and announcing of bids. There are two items that document these regulations. One is the “Alert Procedures.” This is several pages long and contains the complete regulation. The other is the “Alert Chart” which summarizes those regulations. Where there is a conflict between the two the “Alert Procedures” take precedence. Generally copies of both are posted at the club, but they can always be found on the ACBL’s website. Allowed Conventions Open Games For open games the Indianapolis Bridge Center follows the ACBL General Convention Chart. This chart defines what conventions and other agreements are allowed as part of your system. It can be found on the ACBL’s website. Limited Games Our masterpoint-limited games are a part of our teaching program. For these games we follow the ACBL General Convention Chart but with the following additional restrictions: 1. Only systems and conventions based on Standard American as taught at our club are permitted. For example: 2 over 1 is permitted – it is a style of Standard American. 2. Strong One-Club systems such as Precision are not permitted.< 3. Psychs are not permitted. 4. Opening 1NT with a singleton or void is not permitted. 5/19/2013 3:50 PM 4 Indianapolis Bridge Center Conditions of Contest 5. Highly aggressive methods are not permitted (e.g. frequent preempts on 5-card suits) Players wishing to use any of these restricted methods should play in our open games. Convention Cards ACBL tournament regulations state: Each player is required to have a Convention Card legibly filled out and on the table throughout the session. Both cards of a partnership
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bridge Glossary
    Bridge Glossary Above the line In rubber bridge points recorded above a horizontal line on the score-pad. These are extra points, beyond those for tricks bid and made, awarded for holding honour cards in trumps, bonuses for scoring game or slam, for winning a rubber, for overtricks on the declaring side and for under-tricks on the defending side, and for fulfilling doubled or redoubled contracts. ACOL/Acol A bidding system commonly played in the UK. Active An approach to defending a hand that emphasizes quickly setting up winners and taking tricks. See Passive Advance cue bid The cue bid of a first round control that occurs before a partnership has agreed on a suit. Advance sacrifice A sacrifice bid made before the opponents have had an opportunity to determine their optimum contract. For example: 1♦ - 1♠ - Dbl - 5♠. Adverse When you are vulnerable and opponents non-vulnerable. Also called "unfavourable vulnerability vulnerability." Agreement An understanding between partners as to the meaning of a particular bid or defensive play. Alert A method of informing the opponents that partner's bid carries a meaning that they might not expect; alerts are regulated by sponsoring organizations such as EBU, and by individual clubs or organisers of events. Any method of alerting may be authorised including saying "Alert", displaying an Alert card from a bidding box or 'knocking' on the table. Announcement An explanatory statement made by the partner of the player who has just made a bid that is based on a partnership understanding. The purpose of an announcement is similar to that of an Alert.
    [Show full text]
  • Fierce Play-Off Battles in Open; 7 Women's Teams Have Edge
    Issue: 8 Sunday, 27th October 1996 Fierce play-off battles in Open; 7 Women’s teams have edge Open Olympiad Even though all teams have played through 28 of the 35 rounds, nothing is settled. RANKING In Group A France have opened a wide edge over Indonesia, and Poland are nipping at Indonesias OPEN OPEN OPEN OPEN OPEN OPEN OPEN heels. But the battle for fourth place is fierce. Spain has the edge at the moment, but Denmark, Japan OPEN OPEN OPEN OPEN OPEN OPEN OPEN and New Zealand all are close behind. Even Pakistan still has an outside chance of being one of the OPEN OPEN OPEN OPEN OPEN OPEN OPEN four qualifiers. OPEN OPEN OPEN28 OPEN OPEN OPEN OPEN In Group B, Italy had another strong day 84 out of 100 possible VPs to pull a little further ahead A B their lead now is 18 VPs well over half a match. Iceland climbed past Israel into second place with 81 VPs for the day. Israel slipped a bit with two losses in the four matches, but they still are only 6.5 1 FRANCE 552 1 ITALY 553 VPs behind second. Chinese Taipei are another 9 points in arrears. 2 INDONESIA 538 2 ICELAND 535 3 POLAND 533 3 ISRAEL 528 Once again the competition is lively. Russia, Norway, the Netherlands and Great Britain still have 4 SPAIN 508 4 CHINESE TAIPEI 519 good chances.And even the United States, which have been having their troubles here, are an outside 5 DENMARK 504 5 RUSSIA 510 possibility after an 82-VP day.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Convention Charts.Pdf
    The 2018 Convention Charts What Are Bids Allowed To Mean? New Charts To Become Effective Thanksgiving 2018 http://web2.acbl.org/documentLibrary/about/181AttachmentD.pdf The Convention Charts Duplicate Governing Documents Four Documents Govern Duplicate Players: 1. Laws Of Duplicate Bridge — bridge mechanics 2. Convention Charts — partnership agreements 3. Alert Procedures — disclosure of partnership agreements 4. Zero Tolerance Policy — !! be nice !! The Convention Charts New Layout I. Introduction — identifies 4 charts: basic, basic+, open, & open+ II. Usage — basic & basic+: MP limited events — open: most events — open+: NABC & some top-level Regional events III. Definitions — hand strength, natural vs. conventional, etc. IV. Charts — the details V. Examples The Convention Charts Common Definitions Control Points: Aces and Kings are controls Ace = 2 points & King = 1 point EG: ♠Axxx ♥Kxx ♦xxx ♣AKx = 6 Control Points Rule of N: The # of cards in two longest suits plus HCPs EG: ♠xxxxx ♥xxxxx ♦AK ♣Q meets Rule of 19 Preempt: Jump bid NOT promising Average strength Purely Destructive Initial Action: is NOT: — 4+ cards in a known suit, — 3 suited, — 5+ in one of two known suits, — Natural, — 5+/4+ cards in two suits, — Average or better The Convention Charts Hand Strength Definitions Very Strong: 20+ HCPs or 14+ HCPs & 1 trick of game or 5 Control Points & 1 trick of game Strong: 15+ HCPs or 14+ HCPs & Rule of 24, or 5 Control Points & 1 trick of game Average: 10+ HCPs or meets Rule of 19 Near Average: 8+ HCPs or meets Rule of 17 Weak: even
    [Show full text]
  • ACBL Hires New Counsel the Final Round of All Four Flights of the Grand Linda Dunn, an Attorney with a Member of the ACBL and the National Teams Takes Place Today
    Sunday, July 24, 2016 Washington DC • July 21-31, 2016 Volume 88, Number 3 Daily Bulletin 88th North American Bridge Championships [email protected] | Editors: Paul Linxwiler and Brent Manley GNT finals today ACBL hires new counsel The final round of all four flights of the Grand Linda Dunn, an attorney with A member of the ACBL and the National Teams takes place today. extensive experience in the business American Bridge Association (ABA) In the Championship Flight, Martel (D21) meets world, has been hired to fill the since the mid-1980s, she did not play Merblum (D25). Martel won its semifinal match newly created role of ACBL in-house bridge while she pursued her legal against Stoltz (D20) 123-74, while Merblum won in counsel. As a full-time employee, career and only recently returned to two quarters by defeating Smith (D1) 121-37. Dunn is part of the executive the game. In Flight A, Prairie (D6) battles Gao (D19). management team at Headquarters A certified ABA bridge instructor, Prairie topped Pike (D23) 128-103 in the semifinal, in Horn Lake MS. Among other Dunn taught several beginning bridge and in the other bracket, Gao defeated Stein 143-46 responsibilities, she assumes the classes at Chicago public libraries, in three quarters. duties formerly performed by League community centers and her local club. The Flight B title will be decided in the all- Counsel Peter Rank, who is retiring One of her favorite bridge memories California match between Chokriwala (D23) and following the Summer NABC. is winning the ABA Silver Life Master Wilson (D22).
    [Show full text]
  • SUPPLEMENTAL CONDITIONS of CONTEST for MOHANLAL BHARTIA MEMORIAL BRIDGE CHAMPIONSHIP – 2019 Under the Auspices of Bridge Federation of India
    SUPPLEMENTAL CONDITIONS OF CONTEST For MOHANLAL BHARTIA MEMORIAL BRIDGE CHAMPIONSHIP – 2019 Under the auspices of Bridge Federation of India 1. PREAMBLE The conditions of contest herein set forth are supplemental to the General Conditions and Regulations for the National Tournaments as specified by the Bridge Federation of India, and are specific to the 11th Mohanlal Bhartia Memorial Grand Prix Bridge Championship -2019 to be played at WELCOM HOTEL, Dwarka, New Delhi from 14th March to 17th March 2019. The Championship will be conducted under the technical management of Bridge Federation of India. The schedule of events will be as published in the tournament prospectus. In case of necessity the Tournament Committee in consultation with the Chief Tournament Director may alter/modify the format of any of the events. The tournament will be played in accordance with the laws and provisions laid down by the World Bridge Federation (WBF) and Bridge Federation of India (BFI). The championship will follow the WBF – 2017 Laws of Duplicate Bridge. The event complies as qualifying event for purpose of Indian Open Team Selection Trials 2020 for the World Bridge Games 2020, as per the new Selection Policy of BFI, which will come into effect shortly. 2. CONDITIONS OF ENTRY 2.1 GENERAL RULES FOR ELIGIBILITY TO PARTICIPATE 2.1.1 Participation in this tournament is open to resident bridge players of Indian Nationality. Teams having one or more non-resident Indian bridge player or players of other NBO’s of foreign nationality are also allowed to participate. However the qualification for the Indian Team Selection trial will be available for a team, only if all the players of the team are Indian Nationals holding Indian passports.
    [Show full text]
  • The Overcall Structure Revised And
    THE OVERCALL STRUCTURE REVISED AND UPDATED** BY: JOHN E. FOUT TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Simple Overcall at the One Level 2 One No Trump for Takeout 4 The Power Double 6 The Two Level Overcall 6 The Roman Jump Overcall 7 The Two Suited Cue Bid 8 The 2 No Trump Overcall 9 Intermediate Jump Overcall 10 Miscellany 11 Conclusion 12 Glossary 13 **Permission received from John Twineham. All rights reserved to John Fout. THE OVERCALL STRUCTURE Version 1.1 Why the Structure? When the opponents open the bidding, they have already garnered an advantage. Standard defensive bidding methods generally allow you to compete, but this requires holding a good hand. We never have good hands1; we want to compete anyway. The only problem presented to us is that our partner can never take a joke if we're bidding on a distributional hand. The Structure, thus, has been created so that partner will not hang you. The questions arise: why do we want to compete on these "bad" hands, and isn't that dangerous? We believe that competing at the one and the two level is superior to balancing at the three level which can be very dangerous as both opponents have already communicated their values. One note about our style before we go on: all of our bids are made according to relative vulnerability as it relates to sanity. We aren't insane; we just like to compete. This is what advancer (partner of overcaller) must keep in mind because 90% of the time it will be advancer's job to make the decision about how high to compete on the combined offensive values of the partnership.
    [Show full text]
  • FOUR ACES Could Have Done More Safely
    Number: 214 October 2020 BRIDGEJulian Pottage’s Double Dummy Problem UR ACE FO S ♠ 3 2 ♥ A 3 2 ♦ Q ♣ A Q 6 5 4 3 2 ♠ K Q J 10 9 ♠ 8 7 ♥ N ♥ K Q J 10 W E 9 8 7 ♦ 10 S ♦ K J 9 8 7 6 5 ♣ J 10 9 ♣ K ♠ A 6 5 4 ♥ 6 5 4 ♦ A 4 3 2 ♣ 8 7 Contract 3NT by South Lead: ♠K BRIDGE is ceasing publication. The last issueThe will answer be will benumber published on page 216 4 next - month.December 2020. See page 5 for more information. A Sally Brock Looks At Your Slam Bidding Sally’s Slam Clinic Where did we go wrong? Slam of the month Another regular contributor to these Playing standard Acol, South would This month’s hand was sent in by pages, Alex Mathers, sent in the open 2♣, but whatever system was Roger Harris who played it with his following deal which he bid with played it is likely that he would then partner Alan Patel at the Stratford- his partner playing their version of rebid 2NT showing 23-24 points. It is upon-Avon online bridge club. Benjaminised Acol: normal to play the same system after 2♣/2♦ – negative – 2NT as over an opening 2NT, so I was surprised North Dealer South. Game All. Dealer West. Game All. did not use Stayman. In my view the ♠ A 9 4 ♠ J 9 8 correct Acol sequence is: ♥ K 7 6 ♥ A J 10 6 ♦ 2 ♦ K J 7 2 West North East South ♣ A 9 7 6 4 2 ♣ 8 6 Pass Pass Pass 2♣ ♠ Q 10 8 6 3 ♠ J 7 N ♠ Q 4 3 ♠ 10 7 5 2 Pass 2♦ Pass 2NT ♥ Q 9 ♥ 10 8 5 4 2 W E ♥ 7 4 3 N ♥ 9 8 5 2 Pass 3♣ Pass 3♦ ♦ Q J 10 9 5 ♦ K 8 7 3 S W E ♦ 8 5 4 ♦ Q 9 3 Pass 6NT All Pass ♣ 8 ♣ Q 5 S ♣ Q 10 9 4 ♣ J 5 Once South has shown 23 HCP or so, ♠ K 5 2 ♠ A K 6 North knows the values are there for ♥ A J 3 ♥ K Q slam.
    [Show full text]
  • Cathy Chua and Robert Zajac Bulletin #4 Monday June 27 Vu-Graph BBO
    Editors: Cathy Chua and Robert Zajac Bulletin #4 43rd PABF Championships – Open Series 1st Round Robin Ranking (26/6/05) VP IMP Quotient 1 China 152 1.6629 2 China Hong Kong 139 1.2946 3 Indonesia 136 1.2809 4 New Zealand 131 1.1479 5 Chinese Taipei 129 1.1442 6 Australia 128 1.0945 7 Singapore 118 1.1084 8 Philippines 112 0.8706 9 Japan 110 0.8182 10 Korea 97 0.7465 11 Thailand 96 0.7365 12 China Macau 84 0.5880 Monday June 27 Vu-Graph BBO schedule 10.00 Japan Indonesia (Women’s) 1400 Indonesia China Hong Kong (Open) 17.15 Australia Philippines (Open) 43rd PABF Championships – Ladies Series 1st Round Robin Ranking (26/6/05) VP IMP Quotient 1 China 172 2.8528 2 Japan 160 1.8030 3 Indonesia 146 1.4565 4 Australia 133 1.3902 5 Singapore 128 1.1197 6 New Zealand 115 0.9536 7 China Hong Kong 107 0.8348 8 Korea 97 0.6133 9 Thailand 87 0.6138 10 Chinese Taipei 37 0.2696 43rd PABF Championships – Youth Series 1st Round Robin Ranking (26/6/05) VP IMP Quotient 1 Japan 139 1.3088 2 Australia 139 1.2249 3 Singapore 136 1.2324 4 Thailand 130.5 1.1688 5 Chinese Taipei 126.5 1.1149 6 Indonesia 124 1.0030 7 Philippines 120 0.9484 8 China Hong Kong 120 1.0240 9 Korea 63.5 0.4325 Thank You Bridge Base Online The Organizing Committee of the 43rd PABF Championships deeply appreciates the sponsorship provided by Bridge Base Online (BBO) for the operation of the on-site vugraph and the internet broadcast on BBO.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolving a Bridge Bidding System Jason R. Woolever
    Evolving a Bridge Bidding System by Jason R. Woolever B.S., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2000) Submitted to the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Engineering in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2001 @2001 Jason R. Woolever. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to M.I.T. permission to reproduce and distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis BARKER and to grant others the right to do so. MASSOCFT HNOLOGYS JUL 11 2001 LIBRARIES Author ....... ............................ ....... Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science May 25, 2001 Certified by ..................................... ,M d .ill Una-May, GReilly Research Scientist ThesisSuyervisor Accepted by........................................ ........... Arthur C. Smith Chairman, Department Committee on Graduate Students 2 3 Evolving a Bridge Bidding System by Jason R. Woolever Submitted to the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science on May 25, 2001, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Engineering in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Abstract In this thesis, I designed and implemented WEBB, a computer program that produces Bridge bidding systems. WEBB uses a genetic algorithm which leverages expert Bridge knowledge to search the space of Bridge bidding systems. One way in which WEBB differs from other (computerized) Bridge programs is that it learns a bidding system rather than, typically, using a statistically-based search of bidding and card play options or using a naive, pre-scripted convention/system. To learn better and better systems, WEBB uses a co-evolutionary approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Bermuda Bowl Ñ ROUND 1 Ñ 10.30 Australia V USA 1
    Co-ordinator: Jean Paul Meyer – Editor: Brent Manley – Assistant Editors: Mark Horton & Brian Senior French Editor: Guy Dupont – Layout Editor: George Georgopoulos – Photographer: Ron Tacchi Issue No. 1 Monday, 3 November 2003 Damiani to Competitors: Play Fair! VUGRAPH MATCH Bermuda Bowl ñ ROUND 1 ñ 10.30 Australia v USA 1 Bermuda Bowl ñ ROUND 2 ñ 13.20 Sweden v Norway Bermuda Bowl ñ ROUND 3 ñ 16.10 Monaco’s Bermuda Bowl team at the Opening Ceremony Italy v Egypt ith a strongly worded message for players to abide Bermuda Bowl ñ ROUND 4 ñ 21.00 W by the rules, World Bridge Federation President China v Monaco Jose Damiani declared the World Bridge Championships open on Sunday night. Play in the Bermuda Bowl, Venice Cup and Senior Bowl begin today.Thirty countries are rep- Contents resented in the three main events. The President drew applause from the large crowd at the Bermuda Bowl,Venice Cup & Senior Bowl Program 2 Hotel de Paris when he noted that documentation for cer- President’s Opening Speech . 3 tain brown-sticker conventions has fallen short of require- The March of Time . 4 ments "and you must recognize that this is totally unac- Team Notes . 5 ceptable.We expect fair play from all of you." World Youth Team Championship 2003 . 6 Damiani congratulated the players, some of whom had to Le Petit Écho de Monaco . 7 overcome serious challenges to make it to Monaco for the world championships. "I think it is little short of a miracle," the President said, "that we are all here." Damiani was preceded at the podium by Patrice Lecler- Senior Bowl cq, Ministre d'Etat for the Principality of Monaco.
    [Show full text]
  • 93 Pack Pair Pairs Palooka Par Par Contest Par Contract Pard
    Pack Deck of cards. Pair Two players playing bridge together as partners. Partnership. Pairs A form of Duplicate bridge in which each pair competes separately, as distinct from team and individual events. Pairs events are normally scored by matchpoints. Palooka Slang term used to describe someone who does not play bridge well. Par The product of the best bidding and play (of a given deal) by both sides. Par contest A competition that uses composed deals, designed to test each pair's bidding and its card play. After the bidding, pairs are instructed to play (or defend) a specified contract. Results are compared not with other tables but with the predetermined par result. Par contract That contract which results from optimal bidding by both sides, and which neither side could improve by further bidding. Pard Slang for Partner. The Talk of the Table - 93 The Talk of the Table - 94 Partscore 1) A trick score less than 100, obtained by making a contract. 2) The contract that results in that trick score. 3) In rubber bridge, a total of fewer than 100 points below the line. Partial A partscore. Partial elimination An endplay in which declarer is unable to remove all possible safe defensive exit cards, and must hope that the remaining cards are so distributed that the defense cannot get off lead safely. Partner The other member of the partnership. Partnership Two partners who play together. Partnership bidding Sequences in which the opponents do not compete. Partnership desk A service that locates a partner for a player (or teammates for a pair) who does not yet have one.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Ethical Oversight Committee Acbl As to Sherman Gao
    ETHICAL OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE ACBL AS TO SHERMAN GAO Charges of ethical misconduct under Code of Disciplinary Regulations (CDR) 3.2 (violation of ACBL regulations—specification: psyching) and 3.20 (cheating and other ethical violations—specification: unauthorized information) were initiated by Joe Jones, ACBL Executive Director against Sherman Gao on February 25, 2019. The requirements of CDR 2.2.6(b) being fulfilled, the Ethical Oversight Committee (EOC) has proper jurisdiction. The Complaint was amended—after motion and opportunity for response—to include additional, subsequent exemplars of the charged misconduct. Following the filing of the Complaint, the membership of the EOC was contacted, and members who had no basis for self-recusal were asked to indicate their availability. From the members available, EOC Chairman Peter Boyd assigned Bob Glasson as Chairman and Kevin Bathurst, Cheri Bjerkan, Brian Platnick and Eddie Wold as panelists. The names of the EOC members appointed to the hearing panel were disclosed to both parties well in advance of hearing, and opportunity was afforded for objections or challenges in accordance with CDR 5.1.9. There were none. Prior to the hearing, acting under CDR 5.1.6 (see also CDR 5.1.10), Chairman Glasson directed the parties to provide a list of their witnesses, a summary of expected testimony of each witness, and any documentary or demonstrative evidence to both EOC and the opposite party according to sequential deadlines. The evidentiary materials and charging documents were compiled by Compliance Coordinator Sabrina Goley and provided to the parties, representatives, and EOC personnel with a table of contents, and supplemented with additional materials submitted on behalf of the Charged Party with Mr.
    [Show full text]