DOCSLIB.ORG

2013 Update and Boundary Increase Nomination

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2013 Update and Boundary Increase Nomination NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Expires 5/31/2012) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional certification comments, entries, and narrative items on continuation sheets if needed (NPS Form 10-900a). 1. Name of Property historic name Fort Monroe (2013 Update and Boundary Increase) other names/site number VDHR #114-0002 2. Location street & number At the intersection of Mercury Boulevard and Mellon Street not for publication city or town Fort Monroe vicinity state Virginia code 51 county Hampton (Ind. City) code 650 zip code 23651 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this x nomination request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property x meets does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: x national statewide local ____________________________________ Signature of certifying official Date ____________ ____________________________________ ________________________________________ __ Title State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria. ____________________________________ Signature of commenting official Date ___________________ Virginia Department of Historic Resources ___ Title State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government 4. National Park Service Certification I, hereby, certify that this property is: entered in the National Register determined eligible for the National Register determined not eligible for the National Register removed from the National Register other (explain:) ________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________ Signature of the Keeper Date of Action 5. Classification Fort Monroe (2013 Update and Boundary Hampton, Virginia Increase) Name of Property County and State Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property (Check as many boxes as apply) (Check only one box) (Do not include previously listed resources in the count.) Contributing Noncontributing x private building(s) 166 90 Buildings public - Local x district 10 0 Sites public - State site 3 0 Structures x public - Federal structure 1 0 Objects object Total 180 90 Total Name of related multiple property listing Number of contributing resources previously (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing) listed in the National Register N/A 15 6. Function or Use Historic Functions Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions) (Enter categories from instructions) DEFENSE/ military facility DEFENSE/ military facility DEFENSE/ fortification DEFENSE/ fortification DOMESTIC/ institutional housing DOMESTIC/ institutional housing DOMESTIC/ hotel DOMESTIC/ multiple dwelling GOVERNMENT/ post office GOVERNMENT/ post office RELIGION/ religious facility RELIGION/ religious facility DEFENSE/ arms storage COMMERCE/TRADE/ business DEFENSE/ coast guard facility See Continuation Sheet See Continuation Sheet 7. Description Architectural Classification Materials (Enter categories from instructions) (Enter categories from instructions) EARLY REPUBLIC/ Federal foundation: BRICK, STONE, CONCRETE LATE VICTORIAN/ Romanesque walls: BRICK, WOOD: weatherboard, LATE VICTORIAN/ Queen Anne ASBESTOS, METAL, SYNTHETICS ASPHALT, SLATE, METAL: tin, steel, LATE 19th AND 20th CENTURY REVIVALS/ Colonial Revival roof: copper, TERRA COTTA See Continuation Sheet other: EARTH, STONE: granite, sandstone, METAL: cast iron Fort Monroe (2013 Update and Boundary Hampton, Virginia Increase) Name of Property County and State Narrative Description (Describe the historic and current physical appearance of the property. Explain contributing and noncontributing resources if necessary. Begin with a summary paragraph that briefly describes the general characteristics of the property, such as its location, setting, size, and significant features.) Summary Paragraph See Continuation Sheet ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Narrative Description See Continuation Sheet Fort Monroe (2013 Update and Boundary Hampton, Virginia Increase) Name of Property County and State 8. Statement of Significance Applicable National Register Criteria Areas of Significance (Mark "x" in one or more boxes for the criteria qualifying the property (Enter categories from instructions) for National Register listing) Military A Property is associated with events that have made a X significant contribution to the broad patterns of our Engineering history. Ethnic Heritage: Black Social History B X Property is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. Architecture C Property embodies the distinctive characteristics See Continuation Sheet X of a type, period, or method of construction or represents the work of a master, or possesses high Period of Significance artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components lack 1819 - 1960 individual distinction. X D Property has yielded, or is likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Significant Dates 1819 (start of construction) 1824 (Coast Artillery School established) 1861-1867 (Civil War and end of Third System) Criteria Considerations (Mark "x" in all the boxes that apply) Significant Person Property is: (Complete only if Criterion B is marked above) Benjamin F. Butler (See Continuation Sheet) owed by a religious institution or used for religious A purposes. Cultural Affiliation B removed from its original location. Euro-American C a birthplace or grave. Middle and Late Woodland D a cemetery. Architect/Builder E a reconstructed building, object, or structure. Simon Bernard, Col. (Brevet Brigadier General) F a commemorative property. Charles Gratiot G less than 50 years old or achieving significance Paul Pelz, Marcellus Wright within the past 50 years. Beddow, Gerber, and Wharples Period of Significance (justification) The Period of Significance for Fort Monroe begins with the year 1819 and continues through 1960. This period includes the construction of the stone fort, the historic architectural development of the campus and the years in which Fort Monroe served a significant defensive purpose in Hampton Roads. Infill development after the period of significance lacks significant architectural style and has limited historic relevance. There is some archaeological evidence which predates the period of significance, however, it is inconclusive and requires further study to determine the level of contribution to Fort Monroe. Criteria Consideratons (explanation, if necessary) N/A Fort Monroe (2013 Update and Boundary Hampton, Virginia Increase) Name of Property County and State Statement of Significance Summary Paragraph (provide a summary paragraph that includes level of signficance and applicable criteria) See Continuation Sheet ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Narrative Statement of Significance (provide at least one paragraph for each area of significance) See Continuation Sheet ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Developmental history/additional historic context information (if appropriate) See Continuation Sheet Fort Monroe (2013 Update and Boundary Hampton, Virginia Increase) Name of Property County and State 9. Major Bibliographical References Bibliography (Cite the books, articles, and other sources used in preparing this form on one or more continuation sheets) See Continuation Sheet Previous documentation on file (NPS): Primary location of additional data: preliminary determination of individual listing (36 CFR 67 has been X State Historic Preservation Office requested Other State agency X previously listed in the National Register x Federal agency previously determined eligible by the National Register Local government X designated a National Historic Landmark University X recorded by Historic American Buildings Survey #HABS VA,28-HAMP,2A Other Virginia Department of Historic Resources, recorded by Historic American Engineering Record # ____________ Name of repository: Richmond, Virginia; National Park Service Historic Resources Survey Number (if assigned): ____VDHR #114-0002________________________________________________ 10. Geographical Data 165 acres (in addition to the 400 previously Acreage of Property listed) (Do not include previously listed resource acreage) UTM References (Place additional UTM references on a continuation sheet) 1 18N 383024 4096910 3 18N 383059 4095856
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Phase I Remote-Sensing Archaeological Survey Near the Location of a Proposed Groin at Ocean Isle Beach, Brunswick County, North Carolina
    A Phase I Remote-Sensing Archaeological Survey Near the Location of a Proposed Groin at Ocean Isle Beach, Brunswick County, North Carolina Submitted to: Coastal Planning & Engineering of North Carolina 4038 Masonboro Loop Road Wilmington, North Carolina 28409 Submitted by: Gordon P. Watts, Jr. Principal Investigator Tidewater Atlantic Research, Inc. P. O. Box 2494 Washington, North Carolina 27889 7 March 2015 i Abstract Coastal Planning and Engineering of North Carolina (CPE-NC) is the project engineer representing Ocean Isle Beach, North Carolina in its efforts to control erosion at the eastern end of Ocean Isle Beach immediately west of Shallotte Inlet. In order to determine the effects of proposed terminal groin construction activities on potentially significant submerged cultural resources, CPE-NC contracted with Tidewater Atlantic Research, Inc. of Washington, North Carolina to conduct a marine and terrestrial remote-sensing survey of the proposed construction area. Field research for the project was conducted on 12 through 14 December 2014. Analysis of the remote-sensing data generated during the Ocean Isle Beach survey identified a total of 22 magnetic anomalies in the offshore project environment and 4 anomalies in the terrestrial project environment. Sonar identified 16 targets in the marine environment. All of the anomalies and all of the sonar images are associated with previous groin structures or small objects that represent debris associated with those groins or perhaps residential material deposited by storms. None of the anomalies and sonar images appears to represent more complex signatures associated with historic vessel remains. No additional investigation is recommended in conjunction with the proposed groin construction.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Structure Report: Battery Horace Hambright, Fort Pulaski National Monument, Georgia
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Fort Pulaski National Monument Georgia Battery Horace Hambright Historic Structure Report Cultural Resources, Partnerships and Science Division Battery Horace Hambright Fort Pulaski National Monument, Georgia Historic Structure Report February 2019 Prepared by: Panamerican Consultants, Inc. 2390 Clinton Street Buffalo, New York 14227 Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc. 330 Pfingsten Road Northbrook, Illinois 60062 Prepared for: National Park Service Southeast Regional Office 100 Alabama Street SW Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Cultural Resources, Partnership and Science Division Southeast Region National Park Service 100 Alabama Street, SW Atlanta, Georgia 30303 (404) 562-3117 About the front cover: View of Battery Horace Hambright from HABS GA-2158. This manuscript has been authored by Panamerican Consultants, Inc., and Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc., under Contract Number P16PD1918 with the National Park Service. The United States Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the United States Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes. Battery Horace Hambright Fort Pulaski National Monument, Georgia Historic Structure Report Contents List of Figures ..................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Caswell Historic District Fort Caswell, West and South Walls
    NORTH CAROLINA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE Office of Archives and History Department of Cultural Resources NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES Fort Caswell Historic District Caswell Beach vicinity, Brunswick County, BW0230, Listed 12/31/2013 Nomination by Jennifer Martin Mitchell Photographs by Claudia Brown, January 2010, and Jennifer Martin Mitchell, July 2012 Fort Caswell, west and south walls – 1827-1838 19thth Company and 31st Company Barracks – 1901 Battery Bagley – 1898-1899 Historic District Map NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking “x” in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter “N/A” for “not applicable.” For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Fort Caswell Historic District, 31BW801** other names/site number 2. Location street & number 100 Caswell Beach Road N/A not for publication city or town Caswell Beach vicinity state North Carolina code NC county Brunswick code 019 zip code 28465 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set for in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • 20121214,0,843952.Story Consultant: Sustainability D
    Media coverage since December 2012 http://www.dailypress.com/news/hampton/dp-nws-fort-monroe-december-meeting- 20121214,0,843952.story Consultant: Sustainability decades away at Fort Monroe Conservation groups asking preservation not take a back seat to economics By Robert Brauchle, [email protected] | 757-247-2827 December 14, 2012 HAMPTON — The cost of operating Fort Monroe will continue to outpace revenue indefinitely unless the state agency overseeing the property finds creative ways to earn money, according to an accounting firm hired to plan the property's future. Just three options are being considered for Fort Monroe's master plan, all of which run an operating deficit exceeding $3 million annually, according to a presentation given Thursday by master planner Sasaki Associates. Those options include reusing the existing buildings for civilian uses, creating a Wherry Quarter park, and building homes in Wherry. Wherry Quarter — an area north and east of the stone fort that is not included in the National Park Service monument — has been a focus for Citizens for a Fort Monroe National Park, which has lobbied for that 72-acre area to remain park land. The area has been a wild card of sorts throughout the planning process. While public input has overwhelmingly supported green space in Wherry Quarter, state officials have said developing that property may be vital to making Fort Monroe economically sustainable. "We see it as an economic benefit to use that area as park space," said Scott Butler, of the Citizens group. "There are some tourism revenues that we feel haven't been considered." The Fort Monroe Authority has hired consultants to create a master plan to transition the property from military uses to civilian uses.
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Republic Quarterly, 2010, Vol. 44, No. 1-2 Horry County Historical Society
    Coastal Carolina University CCU Digital Commons The ndeI pendent Republic Quarterly Horry County Archives Center 2010 Independent Republic Quarterly, 2010, Vol. 44, No. 1-2 Horry County Historical Society Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.coastal.edu/irq Part of the Civic and Community Engagement Commons, and the History Commons Recommended Citation Horry County Historical Society, "Independent Republic Quarterly, 2010, Vol. 44, No. 1-2" (2010). The Independent Republic Quarterly. 151. https://digitalcommons.coastal.edu/irq/151 This Journal is brought to you for free and open access by the Horry County Archives Center at CCU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The ndeI pendent Republic Quarterly by an authorized administrator of CCU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Independent Republic Quarterly A Publication of the Horry County Historical Society Volume 44, No. 1-2 ISSN 0046-8843 Publication Date 2010 (Printed 2012) Calendar Events: A Timeline for Civil War-Related Quarterly Meeting on Sunday, July 8, 2012 at Events from Georgetown to 3:00 p.m. Adam Emrick reports on Little River cemetery census pro- ject using ground pen- etrating radar. By Rick Simmons Quarterly Meeting on Used with permission: taken from Defending South Carolina’s Sunday, October 14, 2012 at 3:00 p.m. Au- Coast: The Civil War from Georgetown to Little River (Charleston, thors William P. Bald- SC: The History Press 2009) 155-175. win and Selden B. Hill [Additional information is added in brackets.] review their book The Unpainted South: Car- olina’s Vanishing World.
    [Show full text]
  • Dutch Gable Carport Recommended Instruction Manual
    DUTCH GABLE CARPORT RECOMMENDED INSTRUCTION MANUAL This document remains the property of FBHS (Aust) Pty Ltd September 2015 Table of Contents Introduction 2 Components 3 Step 1a – Marking out the Perimeter of the Carport with Footing only 4 Step 2a – Footing Set-Out for Concrete Block Pad Footing 5 Step 1b – Marking out the Perimeter of the Carport with Slab 6 Step 2b – Footing Set-Out for Concrete Slab 7 Step 3 – Preparation of Carport Posts 8 Step 4a – Post Sleeve on Base Plate Set-out on Footing only 9 Step 4b – Post Sleeve on Base Plate Set-out on Slab 10 Step 5 - Fitting of Intermediate Rafters with Apex Bracket 11 Step 6 - Fitting of End Rafters with Apex Bracket and Cross Beam Assembly 12 Step 7 - Fitting of Columns with Haunch Bracket 14 Step 8 - Fitting of Sidewall Eave Purlin (SW) to Post 15 Step 9 – Fixing of Cover Flashing to Sidewall Eave Purlin (SEP) 16 Step 10 - Gutter 16 Step 11 - Sidewall Frame Assembly 18 Step 12 - Other Sidewall Frame Assembly 18 Step 13- Standing First Sidewall Frame Assembly 18 Step 14 - Standing Second Sidewall Frame Assembly 19 Step 15- Fixing of Endwall Eave Purlin(EEP) to Sidewall Eave Purlin (SEP) on the Rear Endwall 19 Step 16- Installation of Rear Endwall Rafter 20 Step 17- Fixing of Dutch Cross Beam 21 Step 18 - Fixing of Rafter Frame Bracket to Cross Beam End Bracket 21 Step 19 - Fixing of Internal Hip Bracket 22 Step 20 - Fixing of Dutch Hip Rafter 23 Step 21- Fixing of Dutch Hip Rafter to the opposite corner 25 Step 22 - Fixing of Crown Rafter 26 Step 23 - Installation of Intermediate Rafters
    [Show full text]
  • Dutch Gable Freestanding Carport
    DUTCH GABLE FREESTANDING CARPORT STRATCO OUTBACK® ASSEMBLY INSTRUCTIONS. Your complete guide to building a FREESTANDING Outback DUTCH GABLE CARPORT BEFORE YOU START Carefully read these instructions. If you do not have all the necessary tools or information, contact Stratco for advice. Before starting lay out all components and check them against the delivery docket. The parts description identifies each key part, and the component location diagram indicates their fastening position. PARTS DESCRIPTION RIDGE KNUCKLE FOOTING PLATE EAVES KNUCKLE FOOTING COLUMNS AND Slots inside the gable rafters to Slots inside column Slots inside gable rafter and KNUCKLE RAFTERS form connection at the ridge to form on concrete column to form connection at Slots inside Pre cut 120 outback footing connection. eaves. column to form beam make up an in ground rafters and columns footing connection PURLINS HIP PLATE RIDGE CAP BARGE CAP INFILL PANELS Purlins provide support for Connects purlins to This flashing covers the roof The barge cap covers Sufficient number of sheets are cladding the hip rafter. sheets at the gable ridge. the area where the provided, from which the required deck finishes at portal dutch gable infill panels can be HIP FLASHING frame cut. Covers the roof sheet ends along the hip rafter. WEATHER STRIP HEX HEAD SELF DRILLING BOLTS AND RIVETS 68 mm PURLIN Weather strip supports infill SCREWS Bolt types vary depending BRACKET panel and covers the sheet Screw types vary depending upon upon the connection, ensure This bracket ends at the collar
    [Show full text]
  • General Information
    General Information Section Includes: General Overview ~ What is a Capital Improvement Plan? …… Page 2-1 ~ Objectives of the Capital Improvement Plan …… Page 2-2 ~ Development Process and Discussions …… Page 2-2 ~ Revenue Sources …… Page 2-3 ~ Financial Policy Statement …… Page 2-4 Capital Improvement Plan Timeline …… Page 2-5 Neighborhood District Map …… Page 2-6 Organizational Policy Framework …… Page 2-7 City Profile …… Page 2-10 City of Hampton Historial Timeline …… Page 2-12 General Information Overview What is a Capital Improvement Plan? A Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is a five-year expenditure plan that addresses the acquisition of property and equipment, new construction and other major improvements to existing public facilities. The first year of the CIP is incorporated into the Manager’s Recommended Budget as the Capital Budget component for the respective year. Each locality establishes its own criteria for capital improvement projects. The criterion established by the City of Hampton is that a capital project must have a total cost in excess of $50,000 and a life expectancy of at least five years, at a minimum. Although the nature and scope of capital improvement projects vary, each project can usually be classified into one of the following Strategic Priority categories: 1. Economic Growth – generating the resources necessary to support the services the community desires and produce quality jobs for our citizens. 2. Educated and Engaged Citizenry – partnering with the Schools System, Hampton University, Thomas Nelson Community College and other formal and informal educational providers to keep, develop and attract a talented citizenry that will have a positive impact on their community and be able to succeed in the global economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Fortress Monroe Photograph Album, Ca
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c84m959g No online items Fortress Monroe photograph album, ca. 1910 Processed by Jane Carpenter with assistance from Simon Elliott; machine-readable finding aid created by Caroline Cubé. UCLA Library Special Collections Room A1713, Charles E. Young Research Library Box 951575 Los Angeles, CA 90095-1575 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.library.ucla.edu/libraries/special/scweb/ © 2013 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Fortress Monroe photograph 94/16 1 album, ca. 1910 Descriptive Summary Title: Fortress Monroe photograph album Date (inclusive): ca. 1910 Collection number: 94/16 Creator: Fortress Monroe. Physical Description: 1 album (21 leaves (2 folded)) : collotypes ; 21 x 26 cm (album) Albertypes or collotypes (photomechanical reproductions of photographic images, using a collotype coating on glass plates which allowed for the high speed mass production of images) are mounted on leaves of heavy olive green paper; printed captions along bottom edge of picture. Brown paper covers, tied with brown silk cord; pictorial onlay on upper cover (photo reproduction of a view of the fort); title "Fortress Monroe " printed in red below. Spec. Coll. copy: imperfect, cover torn, with only last word of title visible. In modern beige and white cloth-covered clamshell box, with velcro closure; box title "Fortress Monroe. 94/16" on spine. Abstract: Souvenir album, probably from ca. 1910, of Fortress Monroe (now known as Fort Monroe) in Hampton, Virginia, containing 22 captioned Albertype or collotype reproductions of historic and contemporary photographs of the fort. Language: Finding aid is written in English.
    [Show full text]
  • Juneau Townsite Historic Building Survey Summary Statement
    E JUNEAU o SITE I TORI BUILDIN URVEY CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU, ALASKA SEPTEMBER 1988 John Olds House t 1903 Davis House 1,18941 8-9 8-10 \ J.M.Davis House 1893 8-29 t St. Nichola. Ru••ian Orthodox Church 1893-1894 Davis House 3,1894 8-6 8-36 Jaeger HouH,1912 St. Ann'. CompJex B-32 1890-1918 B-31 WllllamalUvte DeVighnelOapcMch HOUH ,1913 Circa 1901 B-1 8-71 MI••ion Presbyterian Church 1 BI.hop/Coon AptL Christian Science Church CIrca 1915 (before move) 1906 B-2 B-18 WiUlama/Scy HOUH,1913 PHOTO CREDIT 8-72 JUNEAU TOWNSITE-CIRCA 1913 Scothorn Collection peA 31-25 Alaska State Library ACKNOilLEDGEMENTS This publication was prepared by the City and Borough of Juneau, Departrnent of Community Development with consultants Glenda Choate and Gary H. Gillette, Architect. It was financed in part with federal funds from the National Park Service, Department of the Interior administered through the Office of 'History and Archeology, Alaska Department of i~atural Resources. However the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute its endorsement or recommendation. City and Borough of Juneau, Alaska Department of Community Development Karen Boorman, Director Gabrielle E. LaRoche, Project Manager Jeanette st. George, cartographer Patricia L. Ward, Planner Aide Yvonne L. Davis, Secretary Historic District Advisory Corrunittee Jody Vick, Chairman f1erle Bottge Gerald H. Clark Robert N. DeArmond Gary H. Gillette Jay Johnson Rich Poor Glenda Choate, Historian Archivist Gary H.
    [Show full text]
  • CDSG Newsletter
    CDSGThe Newsletter The Coast Defense Study Group, Inc. — August 2013 Chairman’s Message CDSG Meeting and Tour Calendar Please advise Terry McGovern of any additions As this will be my last column as chairperson, I would like to or changes at [email protected] start by thanking all our hard-working volunteers. As many of you know, there is a small core of dedicated people working to maintain CDSG Special Tour and improve the CDSG. Without these people we would have February 22 - March 5, 2014 no newsletter, journal, or website. These are long-term members Manila Bay, the Philippines who have dedicated significant amounts of their personal time to Andy Grant, [email protected] the group. That being said, what is needed is some new blood to help out. CDSG Annual Conference We still have a continuing need for local representatives for the October 1 - 5, 2014 CDSG Reps program. In addition, the editors are always looking Los Angeles /San Diego HDs for new authors for the newsletter and the journal. Also, the CDSG Mike Fiorini, [email protected] Fund is looking for worthy projects to fund. Many of these goals can be reached if the membership at large CDSG Annual Conference becomes more involved at a local level. Please find time to visit April 2015 the sites in your area – and introduce yourself. By acting as a rep Delaware River HD and maintaining contact with local sites, you can keep in touch Chris Zeeman, [email protected] with what’s going on. For example, you may hear of a project that needs funding that would be ideal for the CDSG Fund.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Tours
    Eight Self-Guided Tours of Regina’s Built History Regina Heritage Walking Tours: Eight Self-Guided Tours of Regina’s Built History Fourth Edition, 2007 City of Regina ISBN: 978-1-896348-60-5 Previously published under the titles: Regina’s Heritage Tours: The Cathedral Area The Crescents Downtown General Hospital Area “Germantown” 11th Avenue East Old Lakeview The Transitional Area The Warehouse District City of Regina Queen Elizabeth II Court 2476 Victoria Avenue P.O. Box 1790 Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada Tel.: 306-777-7000 Fax.: 306-777-6774 www.regina.ca 2 3 Acknowledgements The City of Regina would like to thank William (Bill) Henderson and J. William (Bill) Brennan for their relentless leadership, and members of Heritage Regina for their dedicated support for the publication of this legacy manuscript. In particular, the City of Regina acknowledges and thanks Bill Brennan for his overall review and editing of the text of this publication and his coordination of Heritage Regina's contributors and volunteers, and Bill Henderson for his authorship of the "Architectural Styles" and "Glossary" of definitions sections, and for his contributions to the illustrative graphics of this publication. The City of Regina also acknowledges and thanks the following volunteers for directly assisting in editing the various walking tour sections of this publication: Grace Alexopoulos Bruce Anderson Will Chabun Aydon Charlton Sharon Howell Margaret Hryniuk Keith Knox Susan Luchuck Don Meikle This book was published by the City of Regina in collaboration with Heritage Regina, with the financial support of the Government of Canada, through the Cultural Capitals of Canada, a program of the Department of Canadian Heritage.
    [Show full text]